+Heywood Yabloome Theres a difference between rude and blunt. He just doesnt sugar coat his words in fear of offending people. But he doesnt do it with the purpose of offending, its just the truth.

.. sometimes people get stabbed and the perpetrator will get a solicitor to plead mitigating circumstances (diminished responsibility) to get a lesser charge of 'manslaughter' rather than 'murder' - to the victim and their families it makes no difference whatsoever. Rude = blunt, the purpose is to offend - the other approach is tact and there is a difference. As for 'truth', that is the issue being debated from people's differing perspectives. Take this up to political and national levels - that's were conflicts and wars start.

Indeed! The mindset of murderers, rapists, serial killers .. only the sick and weakminded admire such debased attitudes.

Jazzkeyboardist1 go get a life, Old man. Your days are numbered.

@Jazzkeyboardist1 Your desperate hypothesizing is really quite something. It makes you look pathetic, infantile and ridiculous, just in case you weren't aware...

We sure could use his intellect and courage today. An amazing individual.

Intellect lol. The bar is so low if you are a white man with posh accent.

Thank you for listing these timestamps!

Nice job, thanks

You did great on these timestamps, I only wanted to hear Hitchens. No one else. You took care of this guesswork for me.

Thank you for doing the lord's work

@@Intelligence130 I know what you mean. It's almost painful to watch the priests and their followers, ESPECIALLY the Christians. The Catholics have enough money and power to provide and produce better intellectuals, so this debate was decent enough to watch.

If you don't see the greatness of God then all the things that money can buy become very exciting. If you can't see the sun you will be impressed with a street light. If you've never felt thunder and lightning you'll be impressed with fireworks. And if you turn your back on the greatness and majesty of God you'll fall in love with a world of shadows and short-lived pleasures.

Sir, your “best” years CAN BE at this time or in your future. The years that you lived under a celestial dictatorship are valuable, in that you have direct evidence not of deity but of the evils conjured up by the devotion to unquestioning belief without evidence, without rationality, and with the embrace of unquestioning obedience. Now that you are free of the arrogance of ignorance, live as though you are living with a free mind, a liberated mind, a mind able to confess, without shame or fear of punishment, that you do not know what you do not know. Now, go on and spread the words. Not the Word.

An honest man, good for you sir.

@@johnstewart4350 Which god?

@@LucaFox The one with a capital G.

why do people refer to him as 'hitch'? i cant help thinking he would have hated this nickname, although i may be wrong

@@RS-zp6hb I don't think it bothers him at this point.

Hitches has passed - stick together J with thoughts of Hitchens

I think Hitchens must be the best non fiction writer of our time. We must celebrate his life and works. He lives on in that way.

@@husseinpatel8238 Don't create a religion around him...

J Marici I think the religious people missed him the most, because they have no one push them to study their believe deeper so they can find answers to Christopher criticism.

A remarkable man. I found him too late in life.

The 3 most problematic religions today... well said.

You losers sure love your loser Hitch. Hitch who pretends to know the bible as he screws up on it over and over again including what faith means biblically. --"Faith is the surrender of the mind, it's the surrender of reason, it's the surrender of the only thing that makes us different from other animals. It's our need to believe and to surrender our skepticism and our reason, our yearning to discard that and put all our trust or faith in someone or something, that is the sinister thing to me. ... Out of all the virtues, all the supposed virtues, faith must be the most overrated”-- Christopher Hitchens Now, look at what biblical faith really means that Hitch the liar didn't even look at: Biblically, faith means trust. It's a trust by evidence seen. God asks that we prove things. To reason. To get knowledge. To study. God has nothing to hide. We develop trust from what is seen, and that which is not seen yet is trusted also because of the trust built up from what is seen. It's much like a human relationship. We don't trust much until a person has gained that trust from what is observed. The difference is though, God is not limited to human powers. He created us. Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. crossexamined.org/biblical-faith-vs-blind-faith/ www.truthortradition.com/articles/what-does-the-bible-say-about-faith www.revisedenglishversion.com/Appendix/16/Faith_is_Trust www.truthortradition.com/articles/faith-a-confident-expectation-of-gods-promises-coming-to-pass www.truthortradition.com/articles/hebrews-1-11-and-faith Hitchens always went into evasive word antics to avoid key questions like how we got the creation of the universe. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gM99pN1_xL-3iIk.html The odds are NOT there. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jZePfqiHxqndkXU.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r71pmsSo38Cwo58.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/msqRpLam2dqZkas.html

@@thecrimsondragon9744 isn't it odd that they don't seem to see that they worship a demon if nothing else

Religion only divides people. It doesn’t know anything about unification and/or tolerance. Clearly man made.

Especially when they say it to invoke some moral superiority. "As a Christian..."

Any audio books in particular?

​@@Mrdoom26 God Is Not Great and Hitch-22. also Four Horsemen, but that's not only Hitch

I agree , an incredible loss to humanity -losing Hitchens. Please recommend all the audio books he narrated ?

Welcome Lokesh - I was born into a Catholic family. One arrives at atheism not through brainwashing, but via rational, logical thought. It's a form of enlightenment.

I was brought up Christian but I can’t remember ever believing. I think we can hold onto the compassion, values and wisdom at the root of religion, and look at the world with humility and understand we really don’t know anything. That can scare some people, but not me

​@@gyros69420I was born into a catholic family and by the age of 9 y/o I remember thinking.... this is all B.S.

Buddhists are atheists anyway aren’t they?

Good. You’re seeing the light. Rid yourself of the shackles of religion and start living your life in the freedom secularism gives you. I congratulate you and encourage you to continue thinking freely and on the basis of evidence and reason rather than dogma. Good luck to you.

True. I lucky to have just stumbled upon Christopher Hitchens about 2 years ago. And he just said it like it is? He honest, educated and spot on! I'm truly grateful and enlightened by his knowledge and wisdom.. ;)

VikkiMinaj1

VikkiMinaj1 _

I am sorry your god is dead. Perhaps he was just a foolish man? You are just one of those "intellectual" genius I presume. Hell is full of your kind......Get out of here, you bum!

@@eher1240370 lmao. Its not our god who is dead. We don't have one. Yours however is dead. And was tortured before he did. 😂. I have seen people projecting their insecurities but this is some next level shit

A genius, indeed!

Yes!

Many of us mourn. Then there are others who anticipate with excitement being able to watch from on high as he roasts (literally?) for all of eternity. Though I don't find evidence for a heaven or hell, I can think of worse ways to spend eternity listening to and chatting with Hitch. Even if it's hot.

@@migbham1 you still prove him right even in his death. He said that all the fanatical followers of religion yearn for the end of all life an all civilisation. By spewing this nonsense you’ve just prove him right. And you’re damn right that there’s no evidence for the existence of hell. That’s because it doesn’t exist. There’s no evidence for the existence of Tartarus or Valhalla either, that’s because they don’t exist either.

@@realfrog.9669 What the fuck are you on about? The thing you've proved is that you can't read.

Assuming he exists - the third parameter is that he is all knowing. But there in lies the problem - as I've been saying since I was a child... he CAN'T be all 3 - it's illogical - if he's all knowing and CHOSE to create man KNOWING that the different races would forever try and kill each other / KNOWING that there would be different branches of religions who believed in him which would try and kill each other - let's start with the Protestants and the Catholics and move on from there / KNOWING that there would be genocides and babies would die of starvation / KNOWING that his apparently chosen people would suffer and die by the millions / KNOWING his creation would in turn create weapons which would annihilate not only whole cities filled with men, women and children, but also his other creations. KNOWING all this and being ALL LOVING .... he went ahead anyway and created till his little heart was content - then sat back and although ALL POWERFUL and could have changed or improved his creation... he just shrugged his shoulders because he gave man free will.... HMMM....pity so many babies die of starvation or at the hands of nutters before they are old enough to understand about free will and how much they are loved by their creator

@Mel Dummar And hopefully it would be done with more panache and professionalism than the average state of the union address....OR maybe not... I can see it now....god speaks and instead of two clowns behind him - there would be a whole chorus of angels who, every time god pauses, they would stand / raise their arms to the sky and sing in full voice Hallelujah!!

She could come down at Christmas, appearing at the North Pole so that nobody gets nationalistic about it. She will need to create herself a decent agent and media consultant. She could also create a new animal every year, to replace the ones we are inexorably making extinct.

Stacy Caruso There's very little to comprehend when it comes to the arguments and information put forward by Dinesh so I doubt anyone watching has had any issues in that regard. I struggle to see the pied piper reference too, I'm not shooting it down but it's seems a little strained in its application here. You seem to be under the impression the drinking was a problem? Certainly not for Hitch. He functioned to such a high level even when heavily intoxicated. There is often a positive correlation where genius and drugs are concerned - Also I'm sure Winston Churchill once noted that people like a leader who can handle his drink... Hitch was certainly leading the fight against the idiocy of religion.

@Steve I actually thought D'Souza came up with some (at first glance) pretty good points, but that were ultimately specious and easily refuted. After all, there aren't really any new arguments for the existence of the supernatural and all of them have already been falsified, which is why believers still have to fall back on blind faith as their "reason" to believe.

@Stacy Caruso Said Stacy Caruso thumbing through the passages of a primitive, immoral book written by savages centuries ago that didn't know the earth is orbiting the sun. Fuck off you and your ilk.

@Stacy Caruso Dineshie, is that YOU?

@Stacy Caruso You reek of vodka and fish eggs, comrade.

But if you want to see someone _truly pathetic_ in the face of Hitchens, you have to watch Frank Turek. I smirk at most 'Hitchslap' type situations, but Hitchens Vs Turek... I actually pity Turek.

Harmony Jones It is a classic. I blogged about it at the time and received a torrent of abuse just for pointing out the areas where Turek either didn't seem to understand the question, or actively avoided giving direct answers. His repeated attempts to pivot back to the areas he felt more comfortable were truly cringeworthy.

+Jim - It's to be expected. Simply pointing out the fallacies and/or outright lies that inevitably come spewing out of the religious when they're forced to explain their position logically, will attract the wrath of morons like ants to honey. I always find it funny that the ignorant, barely literate religious cretins that skulk around the internet feel they have to come to the defense of their own "experts" when they get hitchslapped and you point it out.. This is usually done by calling you names, telling you that you will burn in hell, and spouting praise of their deities, and almost never an actual argument worth hearing.

Harmony Jones: Me too! Turek's head almost explodes!! LOL!

Turek, Knechtle, Hovind, Comfort, Boteach, what is this? Crazy names...crazy guys...?!

As a Christian I agree he is immortal. We all live forever in the presence of that which created us.

@@ianalan4367 He didn't mean that literally, you opportunistic nut.

@@neosapien247 Yea, I caught on to the sarcasm. It would appear then, that you are correct, that I was being opportunistic. Whether I’m a nut or not could be questionable. Peace!

Ian Alan depends entirely on whether you believe in the afterlife!

@@neosapien247 Agreed. To go a step further I would actually say it depends entirely on whether there is an afterlife regardless whether we believe in it or not.

As regards zooming past...speak for yourself, I don't like being outed.

He got paid well to tolerate their religious waffle.

@@irielion3748 Of course but I didn't - hence I zoomed! 😂

Sorry - god said you may not covet rock 🤘🏻 - because its a devils symbol. he also said the worlds 2000 yearssssssssss - yeh" your fine.

Lmao

Don’t forget to pay tithe to the rock

Clearly!

LOL

He is dead, end of the show!!!

@@abrahammulder you worship a genocidal demon that demands virgin girls be taken into sex slavery.. if there is a place for the wicked you and your demon will be locked away in hell for all time :) you're a pitiful psychopath.

@@abrahammulder dinesh is a fascist. End of show.

I'd like to get a oijia board and track him down to see if he's changed his mind about anything.

@@rexrambo7686 Warm up hopefully not in hell.

All Saint's are virgins

Amazing!! 😂😂😂 👏

That would only sadly reinforce any kind of religious beliefs

😂

💯💯💯💯💯😂🤣😂🤣

And Pat Robertson is still alive, and he’s at least 20 years older than hitchens

Ya what can first the Bible or agriculture?

@@canadianatheist3578 well they 'can' or "canned' agriculture first... like jars of food... the Bible is on paper...

Yea, he talks like he has no idea an ice age happened and wiped out what ever was on the northern half of this planet.... and flooded the areas that were inhabited... The guy is educated to be stupid...

@z man Thank you for saying "you are sorry". So the Bible, is accurate historically and scientifically?.... 6 days to make the Earth? 6000 years old? Not a single mention of the dinosaurs.... Virgin birth?.... a boat large enough to hold 2 of every animal? Yeah thank God we didn't go to the same school... MY GOD you are wise...

@z man scientifically accurate? Lol

😂

Hitchens is an oldfashioned farty dogmatic, who doesn't believe in his own stuff. Only OK for the vulgar, intellectually naive masses. No loss for humanity.

@@theconnoisseur2346 could you elaborate?

@@theconnoisseur2346 then I love my naivety, Mr C. Pity though that you seem unable to give o n e argument that might be worth debating. weak.

@@user-hq1uf7ud1f he certainly can not. Thats why he didnt bring any argument that could be debated.

@@theconnoisseur2346 saying words doesn’t make it true. Your feelings aren’t fact

? what--arguing with GOD ?

Hey, if "god" ever shows up, I'll gladly argue with it...

@@MrDaiseymay hed sooner pimp slap any being claiming to be god than argue with it and hed be right to do so

Dear Dancers, I couldn't have put it better m'self ... well done and shine on.

Keyboard Dancers. Indeed. I was saddened by the breaking of his friendship with Gore Vidal, whom I find to be another outstanding orator, writer and intellectual.

Maria Callous. I do care. That's exactly why I find that Anglican Bishops, though they may be kind (for now) men, are dutifully dismissed by those that find words without merely resorting to a singular, debunked text.

And he was not having a good day. If you look up his debate with Tony Blair, he shines even brighter.

Gosh, that was put as perfectly and eloquently as the Hitch would have himself.

and who was smarter 41 years ago ?

A true word smith

One of the greatest minds in human history

@@danielsmith1202 But he only got a third at Oxford. I just don't get that. I guess he smoking / drinking a lot. Oh Hitch!

How many People know him?? A few atheists?.🤣🤣

To losers like you, yeah. Hitch who pretends to know the bible as he screws up on it over and over again including what faith means biblically. --"Faith is the surrender of the mind, it's the surrender of reason, it's the surrender of the only thing that makes us different from other animals. It's our need to believe and to surrender our skepticism and our reason, our yearning to discard that and put all our trust or faith in someone or something, that is the sinister thing to me. ... Out of all the virtues, all the supposed virtues, faith must be the most overrated”-- Christopher Hitchens Now, look at what biblical faith really means that Hitch the liar didn't even look at: Biblically, faith means trust. It's a trust by evidence seen. God asks that we prove things. To reason. To get knowledge. To study. God has nothing to hide. We develop trust from what is seen, and that which is not seen yet is trusted also because of the trust built up from what is seen. It's much like a human relationship. We don't trust much until a person has gained that trust from what is observed. The difference is though, God is not limited to human powers. He created us. Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. crossexamined.org/biblical-faith-vs-blind-faith/ www.truthortradition.com/articles/what-does-the-bible-say-about-faith www.revisedenglishversion.com/Appendix/16/Faith_is_Trust www.truthortradition.com/articles/faith-a-confident-expectation-of-gods-promises-coming-to-pass www.truthortradition.com/articles/hebrews-1-11-and-faith Hitchens always went into evasive word antics to avoid key questions like how we got the creation of the universe. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gM99pN1_xL-3iIk.html The odds are NOT there. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jZePfqiHxqndkXU.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r71pmsSo38Cwo58.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/msqRpLam2dqZkas.html

Are you saying that random mutations don't exist? If random mutations exists wouldn't some form outside of natural support? Why don't horns sprout out of our skulls?

His brain was special.

It's a brilliant qoute "...trouble death heaven with my bootless cries..." And then summing it up with the heavens are empty...

@@itstrbo It's "trouble DEAF heaven" Death heaven doesn't make the slightest bit of sense and I don't want to know what you thought it meant.

Hitch can never discuss creation. Because Hitch is a moron. Dumb. Left with no intelligence.

@@demontooth0428 his brain was in alcohol. Only. A pure dumb ass.

Well said.

lol, exactly what I thought, i had a mega eye roll

Spongebob0911 Thank "gawd" for youtube, I'm sure myself and and many others would have never discovered him without it.

Google Douglas Murray

Much as I like Douglas Murray, he's no Hitch. Not Murray's fault, nobody is Hitch. Thank fuck for youtube. I'm still finding "new" Hitchens videos ("new" as in new to me, I haven't seen them before) all these years after his death, and I was a big fan when he was alive and before the cancer. Alas, though, I've seen this particular video before.

i will Hitchlap all of you

I am sorry your god is dead. Perhaps he was just a foolish man? You are just one of those "intellectual" genius I presume. Hell is full of your kind......Get out of here, you bum!

Indoctrination is everywhere in education - all schools have their teachers who are zealous in one cause or another. However `camouflaged` it will come out in their teaching. Our younger generations are now rolling through `snowflakes`, political correctness, and Woke. How they will be shaped in the future is anyone's guess!

The religious indoctrination of children should be classed as child abuse.

According to Christian doctrine, you do have a choice, of course. You can choose to believe in Jesus, or you can choose to go to hell. Some choice, eh?

Dinesh is so obviously childish and emotionally needy it is almost painful to watch. Almost -- because he has done this to himself.

dinesh is brain washed, he comes from india yet he's following the western religion CLEARLY he was brain washed by white people at some point. You can tell he came to USA early as a child/teen and his brain got washed. He could've easily been a muslim/hindu if he stayed back home

I rewatched that bit a few times just because it was so hilarious

@@lefantomer Almost also let me lick your tears Dinesh.

How long have you two been in love

He had truth honesty and reality in his arsenal he was always well armed.

Clever! Bravo!

That was an exceptionally articulate diss.

Haha love it....

😂😂😂

Who in their right mind would have subjected themselves to debating Christopher Hitchens ? Suicide

Love?

Hey, don't blame the sound guys for the sync drift... that's usually the video editor's error !

Does that mean we need a German scientist to debate Ben Stien?

my god that was perfect

yes, i accept things that are true and evident, rather than fantasies made up by people to make themselves feel good no matter how completely ridiculous they are

***** Thus far, I don't think anyone has ever posited a viable solution to hard Solipsism. It seems a question right up there with the existence of God, though in Bayesian terms, I think it's far more likely we're the proverbial Brain in a vat than the creations of any of the posited Gods.

It's more they are trying to change the mind or influence the audience rather than try the same on their opponent. And disouza makes his whole career from spouting nonsense, wether he believes what he is saying or not he's gonna keep spouting shit

Right! The alternative was to be murdered.

and, I admire some of these like Newton... and in my heart, he was an atheist. He wasn't stupid and played politics just to survive in his times. I believe if these scientists were transported into today... they would easily claim atheist. Peace ☮💜

The Jews can boast 20 times more Nobel Laureats than any other race. And their numbers are small. Religion didn't do THEM any harm. Quite the opposite.

One could just as well have listed the mathematicians and scientists of ancient Greece, Arabia, China who obviously would not have been Christian merely because they lived in regions virtually devoid of Christianity. Or Muslim poets such as Hafiz or Rumi whose delightful poetry still touches our hearts today. All of which says absolutely nothing about which religion they may or may not have followed.

It proves that Christianity is in harmony with science. Answer that.

michael. "There is a creator..." Let`s hear it - the sound of blubbing that is.

@@kevincoshner310 Crap name and a crap actor.

@@kevincoshner310 It never ceases to amaze me how sure the stupid are in their ignorance, whilst those people who really think about things are always open to new perspectives.

@@michaeldyas769 I am happy to be called `stupid` or any other name given by a complete stranger who has no idea of my background and abilities in life. The stupidity perhaps rests upon those who look at this amazing `one off` world in the whole universe and say this all happened by `chance`. `Chance` does not produce complexity and order as we have in a `one off` world that is suited to human sustenance. The `Goldilocks effect` only seems to apply to our planet. Our knowledge of all the other worlds in our systems is `rocks, dust and dearth, intense heat etc. If you are scientific in your approach you cannot quote `maybe` or `lucky`, or `waffle` about a parallel universe and other worlds we know nothing of. True and `hard core` Science deals with FACT, the `here and now` and what can be proven, not conjecture! Strange that, in nit!

@@kevincoshner310 I may have misunderstood your comment but are you suggesting that if we found evidence of life on other planets it may change your position? If we had a way to travel to every planet that is in a habitual zone related to its star in the universe and found anything growing or evidence that it at one point did, would you feel the same as you do now? Also, do you believe that Earth has alway had conditions that make it habital for humans since it’s beginning and will continue to eternally?

yes right he is indian buffoon

maybe some payment for the ordeal sweetened the torture...or at least, i'd hope so!

You are just one of those "intellectual" genius I presume. Hell is full of your kind......Get out of here, you bum!

Ciprian Popa ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

@Jazzkeyboardist1 please provide evidence or a point of reference...why a failure? because you disagree with what he says?

Hitch-slapped we call it.

Haha! I was hoping there was a comment about this! I was like "uh oh, You just gave hitch an excuse to start quoting Shakespeare..."

Yeah - hahaha as he goes on to quote Shakespeare within context!!

@@SandraLovesRoses So great!! And after Dinesh fumbles with his defeated double talk, his next sentence is " and now it's your turn to ask me a question ". That's obvious defeat. I love this shit!!🤓💕

Fucking rekt.

Exactly considering almost everything that comes out of Christopher's mouth is a direct quote from 14th-19th century authors. I'm surprised he was never acused of being a plagiarist. Just goes to show how little read modern society is. I don't know who the little boy is but he's the only one I've ever seen give Christopher a challenge. I was pretty surprised to say the least. Needless to say, I don't agree with the little Indian boy, but I give credit where credit is due.

Generally true. I like the stronger rational arguments of Dillahunty and Harris (who focus on whether we actually have a sound justification for belief), but I think there's value in atheists presenting a variety of arguments. Hitchens' strongest argument to me was the moral grounds for opposing certain characters regardless of whether they exist: If a god is said to have drowned everyone without warning over a disagreement, we should oppose that as blatant tyranny, and Hitchens did. His weaker arguments relied on ridicule, but I think those arguments are perhaps even more convincing to theists than the purely rational ones. (Which is a bit sad, really, as I'd love if theists listened and were convinced by rational arguments, but I suppose if they were _there wouldn't be any more theists_ and we wouldn't even be talking about this.)

​@@majmageVery true lol. He had a way of trolling the trolls of you will.

​@@majmage I love Matt too he's fantastic but nobody could shake Hitch. He kept that necessary cool a debate required even when he was being an assh*le .

I have cancer. I had beat it away with a stick before and I thanked god for that.. But then I got butt and mouth cancer so now im athiest

I don't think he's heard of anything that disproves his fantasies. If he has, his addled mind just phase it out like so much white noise. Seriously, he even argued that "if we were around more than 3000 years ago, how come we acomplished nothing?" We accomplished plenty, in fact. And we even recorded it as best we could. In my own land alone there are drawings on cave-walls and on the bleak faces of smooth sections of stones and the very earth we walk, telling of great hunters and their prey, their societies, their beliefs and much more. Oh sorry Dinesh, you wanted a 6K year old library full of English texted scrolls or something that explains everything? Yeah kind of sucks we did not have that 6K years ago, then we would be out in space now, bitching about punks in rag-tag ships writing graffiti on asteroids to show how cool they are. Kids man, what can you do, eh? Bit more serious though, his position is absurd. But then again, he's trying to defend something there is no proof of. We may not be able to disprove that Jesus was real, but he, like any Christian has no evidence for the supposed existence of God. His standard-fare Christian arguments that morality comes from God - in other words that *it is enforced upon pain of eternal torture* - is bullshit too. Any and all Atheisst who are not debased immoral pricks prove this every single day.

Terenin Well said

SiriusMined Actually he's more deluded than I originally thought - I made my above reply half-way though. At the end he makes the absurd claim that Islam don't accept conversion at gun-point, using violence. He did this in a pathetic attempt to prove some point and failed utterly at it. Shows what he knows. For the first 23 years of Islam's life Mohammed was supposedly alive. He essentially wrote two Quran's - one 23 years before his death and one 10 years before his death. Now, in his first 13 years he preached his message and made a little cult-following of 150 people, preaching peacefully, I remind you. 150 people in 13 years is not much at all, I'm sure you will agree. So he re-wrote the Quran entirely. The concept of Jihad, of fighting the unbeliever and so on an so forth did not exist in the first Quran. Not mentioned by a single word. After that for the last decade of Mohammed's life it was violent conversion by the sword using his little army of 150 followers as his basis. When he finally died 10 years later? Over 100,000 followers, all converts to his "faith" upon pain of death. *THAT* is how Islam started. A failed cult that grew into an ideology for conquest and totalitarian rule. Conversion at sword-point was bread and butter for Islam for over 1400 years and still happens today in some areas of the world if some reports are to be believed. In time ofc enough people were born into the faith that you got a steady following, and more and more people started converting peacefully as Islam became more and more established by claiming dominion over the conquered lands of the Jews, Christians and others that they invaded and assimilated. There is also the Dimmie status to consider, the 3rd grade citizens, (Women are the 2nd grade) a notch over the slaves, these Dimmies were reminded on a daily basis in a variety of ways that they were inferior and most eventually convert to Islam to be spared the sub-human humiliation and mistreatment they would get. To claim that Islam don't preach conversion at sword-point is about as ignorant a claim as you can make, and it just goes to show how far down Dinish is willing to slip to hope to prove a point.

And lets not forget the many people even to this day not touched by successful cultures/societies for whom something other than a sharp stick would be a technological marvel. He makes the assumption that if a 30 year old wooden shack in the woods suddenly burns down from a lightning strike, then that means the wood was never flammable until just seconds before the lightning hit... Lightning strikes such as bronze, crops for agriculture (leading to the end of hunter/gather societies solely focused on day to day living) or domesticated beasts of burden.

SiriusMined "Oh come on..." ~Hitchens

Just curious as to why you seem to feel turning people away from Hod is a good admirable thing?

@@ianalan4367 ..Which of the 1,000+ hods are you referring to?

@@andreadiamond7115 Thanks for getting back to me Andrea. Considering the day and age we live in I would start with the Judao-Christian God.

She never answered but I would have been content with why she feels the need to turn people away from Islam. Reality is Christians, Jews, and Muslims believe in the same God. We just have very different depictions of Him.

BOOM!!!! AND DONT GET THE COVID JABS. You would have then undone your own position.

@@thegroove2000 that makes no sense whatsoever,,,,,nice try godboy!

@@woodytheduke Have you had the covid jabs?.

@@thegroove2000 yuuuup,,,,,,yes I have! What is your point?

@@woodytheduke Just asking a question. Have you had the covid jabs?.

U8

He cannot argue scientifically unless he studies the sciences, Hitch has studied various religions, that is why he can argue against a theist so successfully

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

osiris Blanche Anyone can join the dark side for cookies. Some join with others to be wholesome and wise, patience and kindness. When we miss he mark... well, some of us speak of our experience on youtube. We learn from what we've been told by parents, teachers, friends and heads of seminars. My personal experience is perhaps the point to a trust in God, and perhaps that's the point. Personal experience.

osiris Blanche My moral code has always been simple: Thou shalt not be a dick, lest thou be treated as one. A quick look through the Bible says that God is a dick. So, don't aspire to be godly. Problem solved. Further, I would rather believe an inconvenient truth than a comforting lie.

BlackEpyon I'm with you. I even find a virtue in my own interpretation of the first two Commandments. They boil down to Thou Shalt Not Worship Any False God. There are plenty available, from Wealth and Fame, .. to Golf , Cricket, Tennis, and American Football. and of course, the fictitious God of that not very praiseworthy trio, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and later of Moses, Solomon, and of the high priests Annas and Caiaphas.

osiris Blanche, Which "belief" is more rational and logical??? Two people, one Christian the other Atheist, are walking through an apple orchard coming upon 300 apples "perfectly" in a row and "evenly" spaced apart. The atheist concludes "nice accident" and continues walking. Obviously, not thinking anything more about it - as that is how he/she is brainwashed by "secular" society and his/her education to believe. On the other hand, the Christian sees the exact same 300 apples "perfectly" in a row and "evenly" spaced apart, and concludes "WHO IN THE WORLD DID THAT?" Which has a more rational and logical conclusion??? Logically, every building has a "builder" you cannot "see". Behind "order" is an "orderer". Behind an intelligent "design" is a intelligent "designer". Behind something that is "moving" there is a "mover" - that caused it to move. Now, let’s raise the "accident" odds. For me to write this post I have 3 Billion DNA "perfectly" in a row and "evenly" spaced apart and for you to read this post you have 3 Billion DNA "perfectly" in a row and "evenly" spaced apart, so over 6 Billion DNA working. Now, is that just a random "chance" and "accident" to have 6 Billion DNA in a "row" to carry on this conversation??? Is that really a logical and rational conclusion??? Please get to KNOW the supreme "orderer" of this universe, and what He expects out of your life to find "TRUE LIFE" ITSELF. Now, I recommend you watch former atheist Lee Strobel's "Case for the Creator", then read Josh McDowell's "Evidence Demands a Verdict". Follow the "Evidence", facts and "TRUTH" right into the ONE and ONLY established Church of Jesus Christ being the ONE HOLY CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH. May GOD open your eyes and heart guiding you to TRUTH HIMSELF Jesus Christ (John 14:6).

@@onetruefaith2091 its not that simple. There doesn't need to be a "designer" for there to be life. There is overwhelming evidence that life has evolved. If a human species can start from a speck, then it is possible for a speck to start from something less, eventually going to the beginning which could very well be a "big bang." In this universe. Your logic used here doesn't really work. Our bodies are not perfect, nor are our brains. You imply "our bodies were made functional so logically someone made it to function". That shouldn't be the assumption. Life simply adapts and evolves and the dominant genes throughout our species lead to our current forms. Nice try though.

Here, here!! *raises pint*

I echo your words. I “ found “ Christopher much too late in my life and even more so in his. Christopher had died before I had listed to him. The first speech I listened too was at the iq debate “ is the Catholic Church a force for good in the world “alongside Stephen Fry I was hooked there and then. I have listed to that debate many times. I find it , for reasons I cannot explain fully uplifting Positive , which I can understand will be somewhat confusing to some considering some of the subject matter discussed , anyway I’ve slightly digressed

He didn't die. He continues to nourish the world as a worm feast. Oh. He was cremated. (Polluter!) Never mind.

Yes! What a loss to humanity when Hitchens left

He isn’t dead. He has his afterlife in KZfaq.

Obviously that fear is not stopping anyone is it. in fact it may be encouraging them because they know they can just ask for forgiveness and commit all the sins that they want, I mean Jesus will have died for nothing if you do not sin.

@@dr.rickmarshall6697 it justifies monsters to be monsters.

@@dr.rickmarshall6697 that is not how that works lol. If one is doing as you say, "in fact it may be encouraging them because they know they can just ask for forgiveness and commit all the sins that they want, I mean Jesus will have died for nothing if you do not sin." then they are not or ever a true Christian. It is clear you lack any intelligence on the matter except by which your professor told you believe.

@@seanpermann5570 oh and you can say who is or is not a "true" Christian you think you have the power to do this? but I lack any intelligence lol 😂 name one, just one instance where a religious "explanation" has replaced a scientific one. In fact, it is exactly the other way around: For hundreds of years humankind is pedaling away from mythic storytelling in ancient books. You however are living proof that some idiots rather declare reality for manipulated to satisfy their stupendous arrogance when obvious facts collide with their superstitions.

@@seanpermann5570 you would think a true Christian could come up with an answer to the question I proposed .

You love easy

Hitchens is an oldfashioned farty dogmatic, who doesn't believe in his own stuff. Only OK for the vulgar, intellectually naive masses. No loss for humanity.

Impressive how he never seems to exert himself while crushing others who are clearly at (if not beyond) their intellectual limit.

lovely way to put it catweasel.

+Boo tech He is a fool.

+Boo jtech And uses his superior Christian morality to repeatedly step out on his wife.

Most delusional religitards argue like this. They never concede points they just move from one bad argument to a lie to fallacies followed by more nonsense and wishful thinking.

Boo jtech A lot of religious folks do that when I argue when them. They never respond back. They go back to "Jesus loves you, and that's truth".

a freshman, by the way!

Indeed he should have stuck to defending his religion

What happened ? He switched sides ?

Greg Ruth Cause faith is proof...don’t you know?

Dinesh is a fool, lol. I sometimes feel that he doesn't even believe the stuff he's pushing.

@@ericlind6581 jo fan

@@ericlind6581 Faith is Superstition and the mark of an inadequate, inferior mind.

@James Bell That's one hell of a claim you just made. So now prove it.

Kris Wilhelm that’s hillarious

That's right!

As an atheist I have empathy I feel embarrassed on behalf of the unfortunate Mr De Souza

It is saddening to hear Mr D'SOUZA mis-representing Indian ethics and teachings.

Piyush Singh Does conventional Indian wisdom really say ‘a strangers tears are just water’, (I may have misquoted, but I think that was the gist of Desouza’s comment)? That is truly cold 🥶. 🌈

Perhaps people should give up atheism then.

Jon Ellingsen there’s nothing to give up

The moment I heard him say it, I made a note for a song to be written about that metaphor :D God, I miss this guy...

@@stephans.8971 A making of endless notes. Won't do you any good.

@@jonellingsen1250 It's produced a whole bunch of albums so far, so it's working out quite nicely, thanks ;)