Churchill and King George VI

Рет қаралды 251,915

2 жыл бұрын

Пікірлер: 207

@Chris-ji4iu Жыл бұрын

I love how Clementine Churchill picks him up, dusts him off and sets him up to deal with the greatest crisis facing the world.

@decibellone696 Жыл бұрын

yes, she is wonderful.

@64MDW 10 ай бұрын

That's what a good and true wife does.

@Swissswoosher 10 ай бұрын

“You have my support”- the 4 strongest words of King George in this movie

@stevenpilling5318 10 ай бұрын

Few people today appreciate the greatness of King George VI.

@kdmdlo 10 ай бұрын

The late Queen would have absolutely agreed with that sentiment.

@danivarius 10 ай бұрын

@@kdmdloI think that I probably would have, too.

@TheSaltydog07 10 ай бұрын

I can. He refused to leave London during the Blitz.

@tarynwatson8971 10 ай бұрын

And that shows greatness? @@TheSaltydog07

@steffenb.jrgensen2014 10 ай бұрын

Is that all you can see?@@tarynwatson8971

@polybiuschampion7225 Жыл бұрын

Nations who go down fighting, rise again. Truer words.

@TexanIndependence 11 ай бұрын

Not necessarily true. Carthage went down fighting, and never rose again. Gaul, specifically under Vercingetorix and the Arverni tribe leading them, never truly rose again after their defeat. Additionally, many peoples who violently resisted an occupier were then genocided and ceased to exist, while some collaborators, survived and thrived (i.e. the Kipchaks who submitted to Genghis Khan then ruled the Golden Horde later). The idea that Britain would have ceased to exist if it surrendered, isn't accurate. If it was nuked and genocided, THEN it would cease to exist. The British Empire is what would have ceased to exist, the colonial empire that the great Winston Churchill wanted to preserve. The irony there, is that the very same British Empire was betrayed by it's American allies who during the war, bullied Britain to give up world currency reserve status from the British Pound to the American Dollar (Petrodollar made from British protectorates like Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, and even the Saudis were allies of the British in WW2, severing ties with the Germans 10 days after the invasion of Poland and exclusively selling oil to the British, which was critically important for the war effort and often unmentioned, the US then stole that relationship, from the Petropound to the Petrodollar), and the US even opposed Britain in the Suez Crisis, a final nail in the coffin of the British Empire (if you can't guarantee trade and transport thru the Suez, maintaining colonies in the Pacific becomes untenable).

@JxH 10 ай бұрын

@@TexanIndependence I vehemently disagree with your incorrect spelling of the word "its" ("...betrayed by it's [=it is?] American allies..."). The rest is excellent. 🙂

@Briselance 10 ай бұрын

@@TexanIndependence It isn't accurate to think that the UK would have ceased had it been invaded and vanquished by the 3rd Reich, you say. Such a change of regime would have been of no consequence for the UK, you say. You are far too optimistic. Given what they had in store for occupied Europe, how they dismantled France (and that had only been partially done, mind you), the UK would not have fared much better had it been invaded and conquered, and even moreso had the 3rd Reich won the war. The UK simply could not afford to falter and fail.

@kybernetic8 Жыл бұрын

The King here realized finally what Chuchill felt all along--you cannot reason with a tiger, and peace would be a mistake. There is no peace with Germany, not with that man leading. You cannot reason with a psychopath hell belt on dominating all that's in its view, they can only be stopped, by greater force.

@007ndc Жыл бұрын

They were both great men who each played a part in literally saving our world from an unimaginable darkness. God bless them

@susansurles3776 Жыл бұрын

Surely a lesson for our times.

@ds1868 Жыл бұрын

@@007ndc At huge cost though. The war finally destroyed the British Empire and reduced the United Kingdom to the rank of the lesser powers. A problem that it's still dealing with today.

@007ndc Жыл бұрын

@@ds1868 true but the British Empire had it's time in the sun and it was time for it to go away and have independence for all those colonies. Now the American empire.......

@007ndc Жыл бұрын

@@susansurles3776 both men with physical handicaps and foibles they both managed to overcome. Along with FDR in a wheelchair they saved the world from global fascism. We would do well to remember that

@TileGuyJesse 11 ай бұрын

I love how they shot this scene with the one stark light bulb and zero fill lighting. It really served to equalize the two characters and showed the raw desparation of the moment historically.

@blagger42 10 ай бұрын

Outstanding acting

@danceyrselfkleen 10 ай бұрын

You're reading too much into it. Also, your hair is ridiculous and borderline offensive. Just let it go man.

@playlist4637 9 ай бұрын

@@danceyrselfkleen At least he has hair! XD

@Kevin-fj5oe 6 ай бұрын

Trust me, they have way more lightning than you realized.

@duowithng1969 3 ай бұрын

It's the darkest hour, ofc

@Canigoback-ve7xp 5 күн бұрын

A phenomenal scene. Dripping with good acting and good writing and good directing..

@bilsonsimamora9297 Жыл бұрын

Although he was not my king, I feel his voice full of charisma and can strengthen your mind dramatically.

@garymaxwellian9085 Жыл бұрын

He's an actor..😁

@caesar_06 Жыл бұрын

@@garymaxwellian9085 is he really, i thought they dug up george vi for this film

@mattyboy4579 Жыл бұрын

Famously king george vi was a stutterer watch kings speech, his real name was albert but s new king can choose his name and it was decided albert was too germanic!

@mateuszmattias 11 ай бұрын

@@mattyboy4579 From what I've heard the main reason for him picking the name George (which he already had, only not as his first name) was that his great grandfather Prince Albert never could become king (he was married to Queen Victoria, but he wasn't in line for the throne) and that it was seen in the family to be inappropriate for anyone to ever become "Albert the first" since technically in the family he wouldn't be "the first", and so that name although "in the family" was avoided. Same thing with Edward VII who was christened "Albert Edward" but the same thing was done with him, no king Albert, but Edward instead.

@mattyboy4579 10 ай бұрын

@@mateuszmattias i didnt know that mate thats interesting

@jamesterminiello8763 10 ай бұрын

Two men wallowing at the bottom of despair. Great and subtle performances so rare these days.

@SCOTT-ki3ve 6 ай бұрын

King George saved the world in this moment. There were many other moments, but this was the darkest moment of the darkest hr of the darkest day, and he had the leadership, kindness, vision and guts to rouse Mr Churchill back to his magic level

@vikinghex Жыл бұрын

im 80, not a royalist im English by touch by feel by sole my very being is engraved on the George cross I love this scene integrity love of country

@Outnumbered001 Жыл бұрын

Nice!

@johnlansing2902 Жыл бұрын

Truly a man who was required to make bricks without straw , he did as he was required to do and balanced freedom against the darkness .

@rbu2136 Жыл бұрын

Hellof a comment.

@mateuszmattias 11 ай бұрын

"Well if it isn't him it is a marvellous impersonation". Knowing what sense of humour this couple both had, it would be so nice if that were an actual line. (Although it most likely is just artistic licence, but still.)

@pacmanzz 10 ай бұрын

the likeness to the king and the PM is incredible

@Johnston212 11 ай бұрын

As someone who struggles with his own "inner demons", the power of her words at the beginning of the clip cannot be under valued

@Dapryor 11 ай бұрын

I hear ya, brother.

@operation1968 10 ай бұрын

I know what you mean

@EricCole69 Жыл бұрын

He had such a good wife

@kybernetic8 Жыл бұрын

I really enjoyed their relationship in this film, it was very sweet. They had wonderful humor together.

@misterwhipple2870 Жыл бұрын

And she was HOT, too!

@boosuedon 11 ай бұрын

This is an excellent film! Excellent!

@malcolmabram2957 10 ай бұрын

Excellent film. Excellent portrayal of a very difficult time in British history. The appeasement movement did have a lot of support, Britain was alone, and Churchill is only proven right in the hindsight of history. No one had a crystal ball at the time.

@Briselance 10 ай бұрын

Truly, this man had a saint as a wife. If she wholeheartedly supports you like so, gentlemen... you have done unbelievably well.

@DanBeech-ht7sw 9 ай бұрын

I don't think I would want to be married to Mrs Churchill. Notwithstanding the kind words

@stephenflanagan8518 Жыл бұрын

I wasn't born then. My father was in WWII. The King had support of the Commonwealth Nations.

@akiramasashi9317 Жыл бұрын

But there was no Commonwealth of Nations back then. The Commonwealth wasn't established until 1949. Britain was still an empire at the time of WW2.

@stephenflanagan8518 Жыл бұрын

Ok. Thank you for the correction.

@WTFiamabanana Жыл бұрын

@@akiramasashi9317 Why are you being a dickhead? You know he was referring to the empire.

@nicktecky55 10 ай бұрын

@@stephenflanagan8518 Stand fast there. The Commonwealth was established in 1926, when it was known as the British Commonwealth of Nations. In 1949 it became the Commonwealth of Nations and is so today. The change of name had no structural significance, other than that being a republic was no barrier to membership.

@molnya2 2 ай бұрын

@@nicktecky55 My father was in the Merchant Navy (Canadian) during WW2. His passport from that time indicated he was born in Canada, but was still considered a British subject.

@stevemuldoon9451 10 ай бұрын

God sent some very great souls to earth in that century. They stood up to so much.

@michelmendoza1769 9 күн бұрын

The memory of the Somme and Paschendale were fresh in the memory of the British people and their aversion to war was quite understandable no one knew that WW2 would be a war of fire and manuver. Everyone dreaded a nightmare in trenches

@fredgraffam7628 11 ай бұрын

I love this scene… without the resolve of a few leaders, and the majority of the brave English people, buying time for my people (US) to find our resolve (with a not so subtle nudge from the Japanese), things may have come too late…

@UpatoiCreekRifles Жыл бұрын

Great moment

@Stuff8522 Жыл бұрын

The Prime minister of England and the King of England sit down for a little chat. Both are horribly antisocial in their own particularities, but somehow come to the same predilection. "We must join together you and and I to defeat this monstrosity." It's a fantastic scene, and I do not doubt it was shot this way for some obtuse reason.

@ramoncastanos1674 10 ай бұрын

Stop the England stuff, they were the King and the Prime Minister of the UNITED KINGDOM (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), stop cutting those 3 other nations by saying England...

@jamesgale2147 11 ай бұрын

magic, pure magic

@BjrnOttoVasbottenbjovas 9 ай бұрын

Lovely scene

@Cloofinder 8 ай бұрын

King George had served in the military, and Churchill had fought in war before as well. So George would be thr closest ally that could relate to what Churchill was going thru in this time.

@rangedlime 10 ай бұрын

Gary Oldmans performance in this film may be the best ever. You just don’t see him at all, of course prosthetics are phenomenal as well

@doronstauber7285 11 ай бұрын

Sir Winston Churchill is a Titan of the Human Race.

@freebird6591 10 ай бұрын

We'll just look past his genocides in africa i guess.

@TankR Ай бұрын

@@freebird6591 "Every man ever had a statue made of him has been one kind of son of a bitch or another" - Malcom Reynolds This is a feel goody bio-flick. A lot of the scenes didnt even happen, much less happen in the way depicted. Just like The Kings Speech. The point is not to be an absolute faithful representation of events, that would be boring as shit and also.....lets face it, people are assholes, if you saw them in their most candid states every idol you hold dear would loose their shine real quick. The point is to tell a story in the spirit of the times to shed light on a specific figure or point in history, and you are welcome to further research the reality of it on your own (I mean, we live in the era of star trek data pads.....you can look up more than just cat videos and AI generated pseudo-fact shorts.....and I encourage everyone to do so....) Spoiler: There are no saints. Even Hitler thought he was right, had worries, doubts, triumphs.... Oh, and since we're poopooing history, reality check: one of the largest exporters of africans to the slave markets was african. And female. So....exactly how far do you want to go down this path? Thats the truth of the human experience that are tinted in shades of rose, and glorified to easy digestion on the screen. Deal with it ;p

@ChrisGrande 10 ай бұрын

The 1 then 2 lights comment someone else made was spot on

@thomaslongshore1295 Жыл бұрын

Churchill got G.B. through the war and as soon as WWII was over, the Brits to show their gratitude, turned him out of office. Sad.

@Alvan81 11 ай бұрын

Wartime Consilgiére?🤷‍♂️ Maybe we rise only for that moment when we are most needed. FDR, Churchill, Eisenhower, Washington, Elizabeth, Lincoln.

@Parkhill57 11 ай бұрын

Churchill was no leader for a collapsed economy.

@jamesg9468 10 ай бұрын

I despise the Labour party as much as any man with red blood in his veins, but Churchill was a wartime leader and the country then was tired of war. With hindsight, we can say that Labour should never be elevated to office, but at the time you cannot blame the public for wanting something different.

@vangroover1903 10 ай бұрын

@@Alvan81 Ahh, Fredo........Fredo. He neva shoulda goned against da Family.

@vangroover1903 10 ай бұрын

@@jamesg9468 Labour is the worst possible choice, until you look at the alternative the dunces and putzes chose in its stead.

@vangroover1903 10 ай бұрын

It's nice to see Norman Stansfield doing some good for a change.

@petephone9353 10 ай бұрын

Was this by a prescient camera operator or is it from a movie ?

@robertparsons5295 Жыл бұрын

Courage like this is certainly a thing of the past, I believe.

@hmspain52 Жыл бұрын

But may be a thing of the future. Look for courage in the people you vote for. Look for those with the courage to disagree with the majority. Most politicians today are cowards unfortunately.

@robertparsons5295 Жыл бұрын

@@hmspain52 well said, with the annoying caveat that disagreement by itself doesn’t amount to courage.

@vangroover1903 10 ай бұрын

You certainly sound lacking

@64MDW 10 ай бұрын

No...no...it's not. Look around you and you'll see it every day. You just have to recognize and acknowledge it.

@vangroover1903 10 ай бұрын

@@64MDW With the cost of living crises all around I would say it's back in spades.

@fyivid Жыл бұрын

Pro tip: Might mention which film it is taken from (the Darkest Hour).

@TileGuyJesse 11 ай бұрын

It's listed right under the video description. Movie Darkest Hour

@fyivid 11 ай бұрын

@@TileGuyJesse Still nothing in or under the video description on my page, at least.

@anyonymswede 9 ай бұрын

From which film is this?

@thelastjohnwayne 11 ай бұрын

WW2 Took some of the greatest men that the world had ever known to defeat Hitler, Mussolini, and Hirohito.

@meganoob12 11 ай бұрын

Hirohito was only nominally in power. Most decisions were made by the high command of the imperial army who later even oficially took over the government. Showa Tenno for the nost part was only a figure head. The entire lead up into the war (invading Manchuria, Marco Polo bridge…) was instigated by the imperial army without orders from the Emperor

@VersusARCH 9 ай бұрын

Or rather a lack of fuel

@Bazerk101 Жыл бұрын

Sacrifice no iSick force and victory

@jimreilly917 11 ай бұрын

Huh?

@rebimpskitzo8489 Жыл бұрын

This is a beautiful scene.

@onrwy Жыл бұрын

beat the buggers

@danasills7917 Жыл бұрын

And I no longer scare you...?

@tripsando5059 11 ай бұрын

Pax Britanica.

@markokassenaar4387 Жыл бұрын

Amazingly, Churchill is played by the same actor who is Sirius Black in the Harry Potter series...😳

@threalMrT76 Жыл бұрын

and he was Also Jean-Baptise Emmanuel Zorg in The Fifth Element :O

@jimreilly917 11 ай бұрын

He was Dracula in Bram Stokers Dracula. Oldman is a master of his art.

@sairechrysbelleparcon8950 11 ай бұрын

And then US Pres. Harry S. Truman in the film Oppenheimer

@kuveshannaidoo1222 10 ай бұрын

And he was Commissioner Gordon in Batman :D

@ninjaviking4073 5 ай бұрын

mr prime minister, what are you waiting for? DEPLOY THE GARRISON

@ianmarsden6276 8 ай бұрын

George IV might have been the greatest king Britain ever had.

@studinthemaking 11 ай бұрын

Why are they meeting in such a crappy room?

@michaelwgrover 11 ай бұрын

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blitz

@michelmendoza1769 10 ай бұрын

Alcoholic, sarcastic, caustic and irascible at times yet this very flawed man probably helped save civilization. He was dead wrong on both Ireland and India as well as Gallipoli knowingly put munitions on the Lusitania complex great Man I admire him greatly he is the only man alive that save Britain in that time

@aussiejinjo 9 ай бұрын

saved civilisation from what and how

@ktkat1949 10 ай бұрын

Halifax was almost as big a traitor as Edward was. This is a wonderful film. It shows the strengths and flaws of the characters. It is so sad we do not have leaders who have courage, ethics and honesty as they did then. Our world is poised on a cusp of complete annihilation due to the fascist once again and there really is no one to lead us in any country.

@muhammadrashid6699 Жыл бұрын

😅😅😅 which king 😂😂😂😂???

@engineeringoyster6243 Жыл бұрын

George the 6th.

@drsolo7 Жыл бұрын

There was king edward before king george vi

@kuveshannaidoo1222 10 ай бұрын

Not during this period, his older brother abdicated before @@drsolo7

@trevortrevortsr2 2 ай бұрын

History repeats itself - Zelensky faces the same evil

@molnya2 2 ай бұрын

Please do not compare that joker to Churchill. Zelenskiyy is a CIA puppet at best.

@SunofYork Ай бұрын

It is Ah-dolf hitler, not Ay-dolf hitler. We aren't americans

@paulkvothe9847 10 ай бұрын

you can reason with a tiger. It has been done. educate yourself, never stop, its what we are here for. not ment as an insult. but as a friendly. tap on the shoulder

@patrickradcliffe3837 10 ай бұрын

This is not Churchill.

@JMac-fj1rg 11 ай бұрын

Note: the reason for the King's siding with Churchill to fight on was due to the following: 3 days earlier to this , a cable was sent to the Canadian government asking if the King and the royal family could be evacuated to Ottawa. The answer back from the Canadian government was immediate: " Hard NO. He can't come here '!! So the King, sitting in the room with Churchill, knows that they have to fight on , and has become a Churchill supporter, something he wasn't until then !!

@Jakob_DK 10 ай бұрын

Amazing I must look it up. The King not allowed in part of the kingdom.

@JMac-fj1rg 10 ай бұрын

@@Jakob_DK In 1940, Canada was no longer part of the Kingdom (Wiki Statutes of Westminster) Canada was an independent country and a member of the British Commonwealth

@paulhicks6667 10 ай бұрын

Haha what’s this, fake history week? Canada did not refuse entry to its own head of state. Absolute rubbish.

@Jakob_DK 10 ай бұрын

@@JMac-fj1rg king charles is head of state in Canada now.

@glynth 10 ай бұрын

This smells like BS, how can you deny the King of Canada entry yet allow a foreign monarch ( Netherlands ) to reside there. The King chose to stay and share the struggle and plight of his people.

@theAEDan 9 ай бұрын

A traitor and a usurper.

@reecedutfield9305 9 ай бұрын

If only our Grandparents knew what they were fighting for back then to see what this ONCE GREAT Country had become now day's! they would have SURELY joint Hitler!!!!! R.I.P Olde England xxx