“A Gen Z British woman has a gun… but does not have a phone.” “And like that you’ve lost me.” LMAO!!! 🤣

This was a film so damn awful that Jim Cummings (the voice of Tigger and Pooh) said that this was the biggest piece of crap he's ever seen and wants nothing to do with it.

The all important question: Christopher Robin meets the animals in the woods during his childhood . . . But when he leaves they don’t know how to survive? How did they survive before that?! Did he teach them to talk and act like humans as a kid?

Tbh a better plot would have been if Christopher Robin's home was in the wood and went missing as a child. Then the animals either hunt whoever took him or can't leave so stay in the woods becoming angry local cryptids that attack anyone who enters the wood at random. It's not super original but at least it's more to work with than 'becomes doctor and bails so angry.'

10:46: "Tommy Wiseau is a better director than you." Burn!

*Tigger makes a Kramer-esque entrance *: “Say! Where’s Eeyore? Now, I’ve known heffalumps and woozles to be homicidal, but you guys?! I’m bouncin’ outta here. TTFE! Ta-ta for…ever!”

Had the real Christopher Robin saw this film, he would've hated it, but then again, he never liked the original books as a kid to begin with.

I actually sat down and watched this out of morbid curiosity and watching it, something seemed familiar about it and I couldn’t figure out why but then it hit me. There was a Winnie the Pooh creepy pasta. I read eight years ago and The movie is literally 98% identical to that creepy pasta and I guarantee that’s where he got the idea from or maybe he’s the one that wrote the creepy pasta in the first place

It's a good thing that the Winnie the Pooh characters didn't talk because Jim Cummings said that if they used his voice without his permission for the film that the filmmakers would be in "really big trouble".

And just to be clear, it’s bizarre and nonsensical for Christopher Robin Milne to be walking around in the modern day as just a regular old middle-aged doctor considering he was a child in the 1920s and 1930s and lived peacefully till the age of seventy-five before dying in 1996.

I grew up on Winnie the Pooh. So I have no interest seeing a movie or a movie series where he and his friends are turned into horror movie slasher monsters.

"Tommy Wiseau is a better director than you." 😮😮😮 Shots freakin' FIRED!

I don't think they could use the voices as they are still owned by Disney. The copyright is only expired on the books anything developed by Disney is still under copyright.

"Blood and Honey 2", because of its larger $1 million budget, features the killer creatures speaking, unlike the first film, but only grossed $730,160 at the box office.

First: don’t disrespect the Heffalumps and Woozles like that. Second: “Ever have one of those days where you just can’t win, Eeyore?”

I’m glad you mentioned Christopher Robin. That movie really shows how to use clichés correctly. Plus, I liked how the writers came up with a clever explanation to help Christopher’s business while also allowing him to take time off work.

A movie where they are relying on the novelty of being the first adult themed winnie the pooh movie to sell tickets.

I was wondering if you'd cover this. Yes, it's cool that Winnie the Pooh has entered the public domain, but just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.

This movie is evidence why some things shouldn't be in the public domain.

Mcfarlane Toys did the concept of scary public domain characters way better with their twisted land of oz figures.

The cross-breeds stuff in the prologue sounds like a really half-arsed version of that 'League of Extraordinary Gentlemen' comic where Rupert Bear was created by Dr Moreau.

"Just because you *can* do something doesn't mean you *should* do something!"

I think this movie might've been at least watchable had it just taken advantage of its premise's absurdity and gone the dark comedy route. However, the fact that it plays itself as a straightforward horror film with no self awareness is what really hurts it.

4:50 If they’d done that, Jim Cummings would have brought the hammer down on them.

Fuck yeah, Episode 150 is Morbin time

I know I heard the synopsis for this movie before but I think I blocked it out because now I have so many questions: 1. Why didn’t they play on the theory that Winnie the Pooh and everyone in the Hundred Acre Woods were figments of Christopher Robins’ imagination? In fact, that’s what started the series in the first place. The author basing the characters on the games his little son used to play. 2. If they went feral (that’s what the idiot director meant. He meant feral.) because Christopher Robin stopped bringing them food… why didn’t they go feral before? It’s obvious they lived in the woods before he even found them. Are they trying to play on the fact that humans feeding wild animals will cause them to forget how to hunt or scavenge? They said he left to go to college but did they ever state *when* he met them? Was he a child? Where the heck were his parents where they had no idea what their CHILD was doing? 3. If they wanted to keep the idea of Pooh and Piglet kidnapping Christopher Robin to exact their revenge… why wait until after he graduated college? If they went feral, I’d imagine that they would have stalked him down that very night. 4. Why Eeyore? One would think they’d go after the most annoying character in Tigger or could they not get the clearance to use him? Again, they could have done so much more with Eeyore because he would be the most likely to go feral first and destroy the others. Heck, Piglet should have been the sacrifice because he was such a darn fraidy cat. 5. What was the point of the young people who stumbled upon the woods and the animals? They could have easily kept them out of the script and focused only on Christopher Robins survival. All in all, I really think the story would have been better if it was Christopher Robin who was the antagonist. Perhaps he could have been abusing the animals? I did mention that it would have been better if he suffered from a mental illness but perhaps that would have been a bad idea. Still… they actually could have done something… something other than this load of crap. Shame we are getting a sequel.

When something is under public domain, no one wants to do something wholesome or creative: It always has to be a horror movie Like, if Winnie Pooh becomes public, i would do a stop motion movie about it.

6:05 I actually heard that it was because those characters weren't set to be in the public domain until two years later so those characters couldn't be used or referred to directly until the sequel.

Honestly, when this movie was first announced, I was a little excited. I too was obsessed with Winnie the Pooh from an early age and feel protective of his image, but I firmly believe that a good movie can be made out of any idea. If nothing else, this is a cautionary tale about making sure an idea doesn't end up in the wrong hands.

Can't we all just agree that turning beloved childhood characters and innocent and cute things into monsters, villains, murderers, perverts etc. is stupid, lazy, and should stop? Because it needs to, it probably needed to stop yesterday!

First Spooky Rice's review and now this! Honestly, the Razzies giving this Worst Picture honors is cosmic justice... although that the filmmaker wants to attempt a Cinematic Universe is just totally insane!

This is something some edgy teen makes to show how they're an adult and not a kid anymore and they regret making in a few years

The biggest problem with this movie is that it seems like a generic thriller with little to no reason to use the IP. Pooh and Piglet could be replaced by any other slashers and nothing would really change.

Seems like they did Eeyore a favor tbh, so he didn't have to be in this...

The one bit of credit, and this is a massive stretch because I hate the very concept of this thing, that I will give the team is they filmed in the real forest that became the Hundred Acre Wood, Ashdown Forest. Doesn't make it any less likely for Jim Cummings threatening to sue if they use the Sterling Holloway voice, though. And that man was on Splatterhouse and GTA.

The funniest thing about this movie is the fact that a school classroom actually showed this movie and scared the children.

“I just… uhh… what?” Was my first thought when they announced it. I’d hate to see what they do to Oswald the Lucky Rabbit since that and Steamboat Willie are both next in the “10-Minute Horror Movie” genre. Oof. Anyway, I’m glad to see that you got to tear this piece of work a new one. Well done!

So instead of taking the character of Winnie the Pooh (or Edward Bear) and creating a whole new array of adventures in the Hundred Acre Wood, they went for this abomination. Lovely [and yes, I was being sarcastic.]

Not only is there the sequel (and planning a third one), but they're doing movies based on Bambi, Peter Pan, and Pinocchio, along with a massive crossover movie. Also, the best new Winnie the Pooh movie is Goodbye Christopher Robin, which is about A.A. Milne creating the series and the effects it had on his son, the real Christopher Robin Milne.

The movie Deliverance meets the Hundred Acre Woods.

This makes Plan 9 from Outer Space and Manos: The Hands of Fate look like good Movies. YES, I WENT THERE!!

3AM. About to sleep. Here I am. Let's do this. And I will always state they missed the opportunity to have this as their tagline: Someone stole his honey! Now they're all gonna pay! Also Winnie's face looks like Xi Jingping

Every single Friday the 13th movie ever made is better than this thing.

10:46 “Tommy Wiseau is a better director than you.” Clip from Friday: DAAAAAAAAMN!!

"Next time: It's Morbin time!" My god, Sean's finally going to review Madame Web!

Excellent review as ever but, being a pedant , I have to point out that AA Milne’s surname rhymes with “Kiln” and not ….er …. Something that has an “nay” sound at the end. 😉

0:00- Sterling Holloway/Hal Smith/Jim Cummings/Leon Chen as Winnie the Pooh Bear and as well as Rotten Tomatoes: Oh, bother.

Oh bother.... silly ol director

Commenting for engagement. Its always good to see content from our favorite Smeghead

The People who made this are a Bunch of Woozles!

I feel so bad for a group of kids as their teacher showed them this movie thinking that it was going to be a regular Winnie the Pooh movie, to say they'll need therapy is an understatement.

At long last a British Film finally winning the Razzie for Worst Picture. Given a lot of terrible British Films not shown in America, it’s nice to see one win.

Piglet actually survived and returned in the sequel where we see Owl and Tigger help Pooh with his killings. As for Rabbit they said he’ll be in the crossover movie they have planned with Bambi, Peter Pan and Pinocchio

8:43 that's insulting Spirit Halloween!!!

I will concede that Blood and Honey 2 is actually pretty good. It treats this first movie as a movie within the movie, the storyline revolves around Chris this time and not on a bunch of random girls, it has better acting, direction, makeup design, its better.

And every year, more and more of these classic IPs become available. God Help Us.......

I use my Peacock subscription to keep up with Chucky the TV series.

I've been watching your channel for years now and I really wish you had more subscribers because everything you do is so well written. I'm so glad you're keeping it up, may a million subscribers find you someday!

Gonna play devil's advocate for a second: the music was apparently done on a violin *actually used by bees as a hive* and still had the honeycomb inside. And the music is... pretty good! It's a cool attention to detail! Unfortunately everything else blows.

Mostly because of my childhood and me still loving the Winnie the Pooh characters into adulthood, I think this is absolutely atrocious and definitely one of the worst Worst Picture winners of all time.

Oh, bother!

I don't blame the director of Blood and Honey for making a movie just because he could: Tammy and the T-Rex, for instance, was also made for the same reason. But Tammy and the T-Rex at least had a bonkers premise and some cheeky humour that made it so bad it's good; Blood and Honey, on the other hand, is just a generic slasher movie with bad animal masks, and it doesn't even do anything fun with the ip it got access to

I must admit... part of my inner child is dying knowing this exists. But then again, they don't do what College Humor and others have not done already. EDIT: Plus, I wouldn't be surprised if they just stole from some old Pooh-creepypasta, or the FNAF-games...

"Back to their animal origins..." Of walking on two feet? A bear and pig? Still wish you would have ignored this one being the winner and done the Exorcist Believer.

And I thought the Banana Splits Horror Film was probably the weirdest thing ever (depepnding on what People think of that Film). In fact, that might be something he would end up talking about very soon.

Rhys actually seems like a good dude in interviews I've seen with him.

This movie was all over the place that i couldn't enjoy it not even in a 'So Bad it's Hilarious' way.

Oh boy 3 AM!

Rhys Frake-Waterfield is the modern-day Roger Corman. However, the late producer/ director still managed to make a entertaining film.

apparently Rhys Frake-Waterfield also wants to do a TMNT movie.

I died laughing at the ending joke stinger. That was perfect! XD

Oh bother!

I was wondering when you'd be reviewing this trash fire, and you didn't disappoint. The sequel seems to have been better received, so who knows if it will eventually end up in this show? A third installment is in development.

I live in the UK, Last year I was at a Convention in Nottingham and saw someone cosplaying as Pooh from this film, what was funnier to me was that kids were wanting selfies with him because they thought it was Pooh from the cartoons 😂

2:45 Don't say that! - You might wanna at least re-think that statement - Consider: Someone who issues those kind of threats because someone else made a horror movie, is bound to show up at you house and ask for said whatchamacallit and a spoon while wearing a maid outfit, combat boots and a clown mask.

What makes peacock worth it? Well Ironically another bear! The ted series!

I can't believe that bear was driving!

12:19 NOT a reference I remotely expected, but bravo!

A Winnie the Pooh slasher is the laziest edgelord idea that you could come up with.

"Pooh!" said Piglet, "someone has made a no-budget horror film about us where we eat Eeyore and terrorize Christopher Robin!" "Oh, bother," said Pooh.

This movie is a disgrace to the A.A. Milne Books and the Disney Shorts / 1977 Film. We adore the Disney Winnie the Pooh movies and shows a lot.

I think this is the first time I've seen you review one of the same movies as Decker Shadow, Sean. You probably don't know about him, but if you do, I suggest checking him out. The Summer of Steven Segal in particular is recommended. Decker's review of Blood and Honey was also both entertaining, and more sympathetic than yours; but to be fair to you, Decker reviews a lot of Asylum movies as well. He doesn't just review "so bad it's good," stuff; he actually covers movies which are considered literally too bad for mainstream consumption. Still, I love his channel, and his videos have got me through some difficult medical situations as well, so I definitely suggest giving him a watch.

15:50 YESSSSSSSS! (Insert Matt Smith dancing)

4:36 At least Winne the Pooh Blood and Honey's creators didn't use AI voices. Yet

8:20 "Why are you doing this? I did not want to leave you! It's not true, it's heffalump poo! Why are you doing this? I did not want to leave you! I did not! Oh hi Owl."

An overall problem with this film is that it doesn't even try to be something memorable, for better or worse. If you took out the animated intro, replaced Pooh and Piglet with generic slasher villains, gave Christopher Robin a different name and didn't refer to the forest as the Hundred Acre Wood, this would be the most generic slasher film ever. The filmmakers don't even try to do anything to make the Winnie the Pooh properties stand out here; they simply rely on the gimmick alone. And the victims are plain and even look similar at times. Also, apart from the kill sequence with the car being kind of tough to watch (intentionally so), every other kill's just generic as well, like what happened with See No Evil 2.

These horror retellings of childrens material are done purely out of spite.

of all the things that can turn into a horror movie and it’s Winnie the Pooh????

I've really missed this series!

One of my big takeaways from this movie was that if they just made it like a 15-20 min short horror film, it could’ve been fine. The director wanted to make it feature length though, so somehow an 80 min movie is mostly PADDING! Shots either linger waaaay too long, or sequences themselves just keep cutting back and forth so many times and nothing is progressing between said cuts. Remember the scene from Austin Powers where the guy is run over by the steamroller? That’s basically how them killing the girl with car is like, but it’s neither funny nor exciting

My wife is begging to me to watch this and I don't want to! 😭 We're a 300+ horror films a year house, so she wants to see it and I know it will be bad. Ugh. Help me lol

10:53 so is David A. Prior🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

That this movie exists in the first place is an insult to our childhood. And there's a bloody SEQUEL!! [Yes I said that. I am not ashamed.] I never saw this. I don't WANT to see this!!

Not seen the movie - but due to the work i do i am a guest at a con signing in June - and the cast are there... they have top billing and I am there as a Sound designer for DW - this is not gonna go well lol.

Great review. When I heard this movie was coming out I was sure it would be bad and I was right. Next time: A movie that makes me question if Sony can make a good comic book movie without spider man without making it a meme.

Hey now Peacock has Poker Face and Killin’ It; that’s about it but still!

The reason the other characters aren't in the movie is because they were not copywritten until a few years later

The only good thing i can appreciate about this movie is the score, which is way better than it has any right to be. The composer even went as far to use a violin that was used as a beehive, full of honey combs bee larva....legit, there was more effort put into the score than there was the entire film.

Oh no

Blood and Honey honestly reminds me of The Blair Witch Project They were both super low budget movies but internet talk rose it up to more theaters than imagined, made a ton of box office from their low budgets and spawned numerous of sequels alongside pioneering a new genre of horror with Found Footage/Public Domain Horror for copycat makers to take on Not to mention both were nom for Worst Picture, although Blair Witch didn't deserve it while Blood and Honey did deserve the crown