The same process here. One more E C4 ordered.

Dito

after test-driving a kona 64kwh and being initially very impressed, I drove the e-C4 and was even more impressed. Not acceleration-wise, but the whole chassis and suspension feels much better and more composed. Will pick up a polar-white e-C4 (feel pack) next week as my daily driver. :)

Bought EC4 because best power(accessory)/price ratio. Amazing car. Tesla would be better of course but not affordable for me and also who will pay high cost insurance due to high kW?

Thank you very much, that’s very kind of you. Thank you also for watching and taking the time to comment too, because that is very much appreciated.

Thank you for your comment, and continued support. Its really appreciated.

Had the same thougts🤔, Drove it in the rain, no problem with rear view.🙂

I've driven cars with this fastback-like shape all my life. Some of them had wipers, some didn't. The rear window usually stays completely dry, unless you are stuck in traffic. So, unless if you are looking for a city runabout, it's not going to be a problem.

Thanks Leo. Looking forward to driving the new Ioniq 5 myself! Looks fantastic!

If you need the range and space, go for the Niro. Don’t bother with the Leaf. Old hat and outdated in comparison with the other two.

Niro's got short seats, not for long sitting

Yeah true the leaf is crap because it has bad battery degradation because it has no active cooling like tesla or other evs

Not quite one pedal. Not in the way of Nissan's e-Pedal, but fine for low speed around town.

@Whole_Ammo83 just because the Leaf offers one pedal driving doesn’t mean it isn’t outdated. Plenty of other new EVs offer aggressive regen that can do that. Nissan are well aware that the Leaf is way behind class best and I am sure that the next car they bring out will be a vast leap forward on that car, especially given how good the Ariya is.

ID.3 has a better range (just) and performance, but the Citroen trumps it significantly for comfort. Better ride quality and better seats.

@@AutoEV many thanks, that’s very helpful.

It was a bit of a half-way model the BX. It replaced the GS/GSA which was a C-sector car. Citroen tried to fill two markets (C and D-sectors) with the BX, but became a bit mainstream when it came to replacing it as the did it with two cars - the ZX sat in eth C-Sector competing with Escorts, Golfs and Astras, whilst the Xantia went after the D-Sector with Mondeos, Passats and Cavaliers. Good cars though. I had an AX Debut as my demonstrator back in 1993!

You are comparing two different numbers. Net capacity for C4 is 45kWh (and 38kWh for ioniq) and gross capacity is 50 kWh (and bit over 40 for ioniq). It is fair to compare net capacity when we are talking about range and while there is a difference, it's not as wide as your numbers would suggest.

It was spelt Xantia. And technically, both the ZX and Xantia replaced the BX. I know this as I was working at Citroen as the BX was being phased out.

We have now. Check out our Skoda Enyaq video. Thanks for the comment. Bryan.

I am quite "old-fashioned" in some ways, and I felt that the car was more akin to the more normal cars in the sector, such as the Ioniq, Leaf and ID.3. That isn't to say that you shouldn't compare it to the Kona, as it is a very good car, and can be had at a price similar to the Citroen, but I just wanted to segment it a bit more in-line with the other C-segment cars available. No other reason than that. Thank you for watching and taking the time to comment. Bryan.

@@AutoEV that is my point exactly. Isnt C4 more similar to Kona, then it is to Ioniq? Ioniq is a sedan, and Kona, C4 are suv with more clerance. C4, kona, Niro, P2008 are more suv. Just my 2 cents.

@@RomanRoman-xi3dv No, I don't think the C4 is a crossover like the Kona. The 2008 is a bit more like it, but the Niro is bigger than them all. I look at the C4 like the Polestar 2. Not a full crossover in terms of height, just a bit "jacked-up" over the usual ride height. But happy to hear a different point of view and opinion. Either way, the Kona is a good car and we are looking forward to driving the facelifted car soon.

Nah, he's much better looking.......😉

Would add built ice car's and electric as batteries have second use and can be made sustainably. Do look at BMW I net zero I program . Electric cars can be made badly but also easy to be built sustainably future biofabrication 🌍👍

The HUD is adjustable. I have also tested the car and I liked it so much that I am now waiting for the delivery. It is not a sporty car, there I agree, but it is comfortable which is what counts in every day use. When I first test drove I flogged it, then it was a bit wallowy and disappointing (but still good road grip), but then I drove it as I usually drive on my usual commuter route and then it was really good and comfortable. The Infotainment system: you can always bypass it with Apple Carplay or Android Auto, so not an issue for me. The ID.3 looks like a toy car to me both inside and out, not an alternative. The E- niro and Kona are boxy SUVs with poor design, not an alternative either IMO.

the kona looks awful

I drove the same 3 cars as test drive. The Citroen won for me. The Kona as an ugly silver plastic interior and a lot of noise whilst driving. The ID3 is a nice car to drive but doesn't has the comfort like the Citroen. It's all about taste!

@Whole_Ammo83 stick with the C4 then👍🏻

I have a EV but know they are no less toxic than ice technologies, you should really get your facts straight! 🙃

@@Sherukka your so wrong so wrong electric is more efficient simple long life and when we build a global renewable future for our children electric. The ban of toxic is coming the con men selling toxic fossil fuel and crap ice, cars will end, if in time before mass extinction is a real problem 😱. EV'S best of all do not burn toxic fossil locked in carbon dirty oil. Me I am on the engineering winning side. Only problem electric renewable future will not fit in to wastefully capitalism🙄🙄🙄🤔. Time for global change nonprofit green leadership #buzzofftoxic

It isn't that the handling is "poor" Tom, just that it isn't the car's forte. The steering is set up to be light and easy to manoeuvre, so it's more comfortable. I'd just like to have had a bit more communication from the front, but don't think of it as a bad-handling car. As I said, as a family car, it its beautifully comfortable inside. The issue with the wind noise is only noticeable on something like an EV when you have less of the usual ambient noises to to drown it out, such as engine and transmission noise. Trust me, the Hyundai Kona Electric has a similar issue where there is a wind resonance from the wheel arches, and that is much more noticeable than the mirrors on the C4. Anyway, thank you for watching and taking the time to comment. It is very much appreciated. Bryan.

@@AutoEV A long and considered reply. deserves a response. your reviews are good even though you effervesce over the Honda. My view is what are we expecting from cars? Why do we need them at all. Clearly as human progress has been made by industrialization we need to get from affordable housing to a place of income generation. Public transport helps. However pandemics seem to be the new reality of homeworking for the educated class. So individual transport is a luxury for many and a necessary for some. As a luxury item manufacturers try to bring the latest fashion in the hope of sales. For the the real needy of transport cheap and reliable is the highest priority. personally I arranged my live to fit my needs, I can walk to the shops, use my ebike for the luxury days out and my car stays in the garage 98% of the time. Will I buy an EV in the future, Maybe for the tech and play.

@@tomquimby8669 Really interesting viewpoint, and I think you might enjoy our next video when we looked at urban mobility!

Rolls-Royce style cars are us who like to have a very comfortable and glorious life! Soft and comfy, aaaaah! 🤗

Keep pumping money into diesel then