Don't know why I ever expected more from Clarence... very disappointed.

​@@oldrrocrWhy because he believes people not convicted of a crime still have rights?

Remove Thomas from the court!

I’d like to agree, but Sam Alito has earned his place in the annals of abject disgrace, right next to Uncle Clarence!

@@ks9610 You are right. He sure does. 👎😡

that requires a supermajority, so not going to happen anytime soon

Are the following allegations?🤣🤣 Clarence "Affirmative Action" "Money Bags" "Money Train" "Kept Man" Thomas is rich. He does not officially own much. His assets are not in his name! Presidents cannot keep gifts. Why should this SCOTUS keep gifts from Harlan Crow, the Koch brothers or any other GOP (4 known) buyers that: --Paid for his wedding and honeymoon --Dallas Cowboys super bowl ring --Mothers house and properties --Nephews University tuition paid in full --Leo Lenard payments to Ginny's law firm --Horatio Alger Association of the wealthy that he is now an idolized member. Yes, he receives gifts from this association --David Sokol is a helping hand --Free flights on private jets, free super yacht trips and free stays at resorts. HE NEVER PAID FROM HIS SCOTUS salary --Millions in gifts!!! Why? --Ginger Holdings LLC? --Thomas never repaid a “substantial portion” of a $267,230 loan he received from his "wealthy friend", Anthony Welters to pay off Thomas's luxury RV --As of 2024-6-9; "money bags" Thomas has accepted and kept over $4.5M in gifts. --Only tip of iceberg. There is more to come The previous comments are allegations. 🙈🙊

And, whomever is the highest bidder!!!

To be fair, most American wives run the checking and savings accounts in a marriage! And to be clear, I think CT shouldn’t be anywhere near the SCOTUS!

Your comment has absolutely no merit.

​@@ClarityDeterminationsomeone's triggered 😂

The Republicans put him on the court for just this kind of reason.

And what did Joe Biden do about it back then HMMM HMMMMMMM

@@lillianmatthew3880 are you a Trump supporter? Res iipsa loquitor.

@@hollyweir7537 I'm asking do you remember what Joe did during the Anita Hill Trials Do YOU

@@hollyweir7537 You support her but only until Biden is involved is that how it is. Just like Democrat using the Black woman

@@lillianmatthew3880 Anita Hill was one of the reasons Biden was #4 on my top three list during the primaries.

Not everyone with a restraining order is a criminal. Some are victims of someone else lying to get a bogus TRO. So now they get a double whammy and have their rights taken too.

Money

Money and population control.

The ones pushing for no regulations are not generally in the places where mass shootings occur. Their kids go to private schools.

And, the nation & world!!!

Just like your mother😂

@@jessepatterson1909 SOUNDS LIKE YOURS---THTS WAT MY DAD SAID.....................

Well said.

​@@jessepatterson1909i can sense the confusion in you 😅😂 " a loser you are" said yoda

Do you know what is?

​@@ericklaus3972 what's it like being a troll? Knowing you will never be anything else....ever.

And to His loved ones I guess. Take Justice Thomas's guns away, please.

​@@ericklaus3972He's not part of the deep state

I wonder why my D e e p. S t a t e Comment got deleted .

More "yassa massa" nonsense from Uncle Tom's Cabin.

I thought I was the only one that was looking at that factor.

I doubt it. This decision alone must have come in at several millions.

Or tuition for his nephew or a house for his mother

He'd sell his own mother for a buck

Is it because he believes people not convicted of a crime still have rights?

@@Moose_King_05 You're saying he has 'a right' to sell the Constitution if he wants?

Thomas is a monster!!🤮🤮🤮

Well you can't stand up if all you know is lying!

He's well owned.

@@denarisnoctem4562 Trump's #1 Uncle Tom

Absolutely ANYTHING, including ruling against Blacks, his own ppl, although I think his problem is he sooo wishes he’s been born in another skin. A disgrace to his own ppl and to our country. 😡👎🏼👎🏼👎🏼💪

How much?

I'm betting he is just a conduit for the other billionaires. Ten per cent for the big guy Harlan Crow?

@b.t.2795 yea that's it I'm sure.

Stupid comment, but you're in good company.

At last count, it was around 4 million. ​@@jimmyjames6487

It won't happen. For sum FREAK reason we talk about "accountability" but WHEN has that ever really happened? We're hypocrites unto ourselves as a nation ergo: this is what happens to us CLARENCE THOMAS

@@aimeethomas1688 everyone pounds their chest and says that things like this can't happen in America. Yet, here we are. And the next time this happens, the same people will say the same things, as if America is immune to massive corruption, or at least it gets investigated and stopped, when in reality, the reporting gets quiet and nothing happens.

Worry more about Europe and let United States citizens worry about the United States.

only 2 foreign misinformation bots disagree😂

​@@muddywater4505 I still don't see your legitimate 3 pieces of American ID grandma.

@@WeAreGoingBack76 Is he? What does the bill of rights tell us about domestic abusers' rights to carry a gun?

@@b.t.2795 Go get a hug from your Grandma Little One

Why? Because he doesn't agree with you? 😂

Clarence Thomas stood for all of us here in these forums, recently in Moody v Netchoice. He was BRILLIANT. Check out the oral argument. Guess which side Brandon was on...

@@babadook-qr6pvbecause he stand for nothing, troll.

@@JonathanSterlingUSAthe ignorance on the right is astounding.

"Clarence THOMAS stands for nothing ..." Except HIMSELF

How is being the only dissent doing anybody a favor? Not holding my breath for that answer...

Funny how so many people upvote nonsense like that. That post makes ZERO sense, but it's calling him a "bad man" and that's what they like.

His owners.

​@JonathanSterlingUSA It's patently obvious that his voting record on guns and the second ammendment is in lock step with the policies of the NRA and disregards the obvious need to protect people from others with a history of violence. No one in their right mind would agree with his decision.

Yeah sure he will. He's no different than Trump, he's exempt, privileged, entitled, sacrosanct etc., according to Clarence Thomas. 😮

I am not wondering, calling him horrible is a compliment: HE is disgraceful, disgusting, abhorrent, and worthless.

but consistent. he does what he is paid to do by the highest bidder.

THOMAS NEEDS TO BE IMPEACHED. N CHARGED CRIMINALLY N JAILED FOR LIFE.

You are racist.

@@MrWhiskybreath MrWhiskybreath, the other one was @saltyshaker5069, who or what these bots/trolls expect gaining by saying people are racist? Some serious disturb and sick people. Whats the goal in these comments? Really sick.

what corruption el stoop ed

How far we have come from a well regulated militia.

Any ideas to curb govt corruption?

⁠​⁠@@MegaLaidback. Same rules as the rest of us, for a start. Large bank deposits don’t go unnoticed. Sneeze and our credit report feels it. How’d it escape anyone noticing…ProPublica saw it eight years before. My neighbors would notice if I sent postcards from Bali. Rules for Thee, Not For Me. What was the second clue?

Yes but the term cannot be too short because law would change rapidly, causing instability.

Traditional women matter, but you Leftist women are insufferable narcissists.

Service animals have more rights than women, the way the christian right thinks it should be.

PS - NONE of us matter to them. Hello

When u say them. Who u talking about, blacks ? The only one who voted no is a black guy

If you're putting your faith in PFA's instead of your own ability and right to protect yourself, then you truly don't have the power and equality that you seek.

Why because he's doing his job and won't lock up trump?

@@babadook-qr6pv Because he's accepting bribes and hiding it.

He's a disgrace to his color.😭

​@@babadook-qr6pvyr the enemy now..and a traitor..just like yr Putin fluffer, the orange who would be king..go sit down a play with yr little thing

@@babadook-qr6pv - *Your CULT sucks!!!*

Yes it was.

​@@keegan449 No, it literally wasn't. As soon as the regular Army was created, 2A should have been aboIished.

Well regulated.

@@Canard712 means individuals who are well trained, the people are the militia, and are expected to provide their own arms. you love taking just a portion to make it mean what you want .

​@@markburton5292uh, huh, that's why, before the NRA, so many cities kept their own Armories, stocked with arms in case of another 1812 invasion...... history-ignorant '0000'

They understand. They don't care.

They wouldn't care.

Exactly, totally agree.

Any attorney is allowed to petition the Supreme Court if they lose in the Appeals Court. Doesn’t mean the Supreme Court has to take up his case.

people still have rights even people in prison. you have the right to appeal, also attorneys do exist for this reason.

If there is a constutional issue that needs to be addressed maybe. But almost few cases get that far.

Why bc he follows the constitution 🤷‍♀️

The whole system does.

Most likely not

for what? can you even list any law that would qualify for him to be impeached? you can't just impeach because you don't agree with them.

For what knowing how to read the 2nd Amendment lol all the other judges should be impeach for infringing on the 2nd Amendment no matter what their BS excuse is.

@@markburton5292 Incorrect, again.

@@jessesmith2922 You love all the gun crime, typical MAGA.

Get used to it the Bidens have been for sale for over 50 years.

So is Biden

Awe! Because your views aren't being upheld. News flash your opinion is like a fart in the wind.

I'd love a private jet at my disposal and a 40' luxury Prevost for good measure. 😎

🤣

I just basically said the same!

Not the same thing at all.

if you are talking about someone who has been convicted yes, that would be the same as someone who has been non-voluntarily committed to a mental institution. but it is not the same as someone who has just been accused and not convicted.

As far as we know he hasn't flown the flags at his properties upside down.

@@b.t.2795 suggesting Samuel Alito should be telling his wife what to do is a really great idea, please keep it up...

@@JonathanSterlingUSA He's a weak beta then, eh?

@@gregc.5684 What country are you from, talking nobody?

@@JonathanSterlingUSA What, Ivan?

Joe Biden reminds me of C-3PO.

putin reminds me of gollum

@@swimminginthoughts you won't be saying that after trumps big loss in the debate next week.

trump reminds me of bobafet

​@@swimminginthoughts CPO's brain didn't freeze in 35 second increments grandma. Hannibal Lecter and Joan Rivers agree.

Is it because he believes people not convicted of a crime still have rights?

In addition, in my opinion,it's time to draft a new amendment to enshrine public safety in the Constitution. They say that gun safety is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, okay, let's put it in the Constitution. 38 states required for ratification, not easy but not impossible. 🗽 The framers intended the Constitution would grow with the nation. A new public safety amendment would protect against an overreaching SCOTUS trying to tumble over as much gun safety legislation as possible. Remember that Breun was an attempt to toss a law that had been in place in NYS for 100+ years. The bump stock mess attempts to damage the 100+ year prohibition on machine guns. Enough. 🗽

@@girlfromthebronxbywayofelb7288 - Well the last amendment attempt still hasn't passed. The ERA.

So, you are standing on the side of it’s OK for people to die because you want to argue semantics.

In some ways, the ERA is an unfinished story. The problem with the ERA is that they placed an expiration date on the ratification. Don't know if that's a typical move. Enough states did ratify, but not within the time frame. A legal challenge to the time frame could resolve the problem. Given the current challenge to safe reproductive healthcare, in addition to contraception, marriage equality, etc an equal rights amendment seems more necessary than ever. Challenging the time frame, or reintroducing a similar amendment draft with the additional information for contraception, IVF, reproductive healthcare, marriage equality could be an excellent way to enshrine all of the rights covered by the right to privacy. Ratification might be accomplished more quickly this time, especially if they/we do our homework on checking in with the states that already ratified the ERA.

The reality is that it has been too long since we last amended the Constitution. Perhaps we were lulled into a false sense of security by SCOTUS that were responsible and respected precedent. Now we seem to be in a brave new world. A new amendment to enshrine public safety in the Constitution is overdue. Guns cannot have more rights than innocent people, school children, or abused women. Enough. Ratification is not impossible, just difficult. Given that ten states already ban AR 15, given that many states already have strong gun safety legislation, we might be closer to 38 than we think. We are the USA. We do difficult things all the time. We are afraid of ratification? Really? Constant gun carnage is the problem. Time to solve it.

Samuel Alito does the laundry for his wife. 😜

The person in question isn’t a member of a well-regulated militia, so abuser or not, his right to bear arms can be abridged.

That sounds like Joe Biden's America.

​@@nuplanner5345the People are the militia, it says it right there why are you dems so stupid and illiterate?

@@nuplanner5345 That's an incorrect reading of our Constitution. That preface made no such suggestion. The right is the right of THE PEOPLE.

​@@thebilboshow168you keep spelling Don the con Trump wrong

👍👍👍👎🙌

go say that to someone who has been wrongfully accused. Emotion should not play into this. due process should be required before you remove anyone's rights

An armed woman whos been victimised by domestic abuse.

​@@markburton5292because gun violence never evokes any emotion ....

@@TypeOneg bad argument and you know it.

So, if the Constitution doesn't say we should have speed limits for how fast Dobbin can run down the road pulling the hay wagon, we can't have them for semi's either?

It's time to draft a new amendment to enshrine public safety in the Constitution. The Constitution was meant to grow with the nation. This new amendment should even be written as more than one sentence, so that it is not so frequently misinterpreted. Let's be clear about what is needed to improve gun safety in 2024 and moving forward. Ratification requires 38 states. Not easy, but not impossible. Doing nothing about continuing gun carnage , that's impossible. 🗽

RIGHT. ON.!!

🗽💙🌊💙🌊🗽 Up and down the ballot.

You forgot we the people. You are taking one half out of context.

Stop crying

Crying? He was on the losing side 9-1.

Exactly. He is so stupid that he does not comprehend how stupid he truly is.

Joe Biden

​@@commonsense3632give an example

99./. Of all the republicans

Clarence Thomas but he's had more experience. Eileen Cannon will sell out the Constitution every chance she gets.

Plus 99% of dems - they are all one don’t kid yourself

and Uncle "TOM"

Says an illiterate. No constitutional right is unlimited and can be reasonably regulated by government.

An abuser is an abuser, whether he is convicted or not.

​@@EducatedBlackManWrong, you're a traitor to this nation.

@@thebilboshow168 Is that what fox news told you? Are you an abuser?

correct but at time he wasn't convicted. that is what the dissent was about.

He was "bought and paid for"? How racist of you!

Kind of like the Bidens and Ukraine!!! 10% for the big guy!!!

Who’s bidding ? Sotomeyer didn’t recuse herself when her publisher’s case was before the court, why should I care about this???

Plenty, a good porttion of them are/were police.

More than half of female homicide victims are killed by a current or former male intimate partner,1 and 96% of murder-suicide victims are female.2 Firearms are used in more than 50% of these IPV-related homicides.3 It's like ALOT

none

@@Bruce-kx5ku Sorry. Wrong answer Thousands.

Complicated answer: not all states have laws requiring the surrender of firearms or adequate record keeping...so here are a few stats from what we do know: 4.5 million women per year are threatened by an intimate partner with a firearm. Nearly all those guns were bought and registered legally. One in eight people who try to legally purchase and register a firearm are turned down due to record of domestic violence. 1 in 8. Due to loopholes you can drive a truck through, the numbers may be much higher. And here is another fun data point people don't think.of...if a gun has been used to threaten a victim, those victims if not shot, incur more severe injuries from beatings .

and deranged & damaged.

I agree I am a centrist Republican and i have no problem with point counter point bring both sides together.

Anita Hill told the true,

For LIFE Cope Harder

🤘🏻

I believe two women are killed everyday by their former or current partners. Check out the case of Dominique Dunne. Killed in 1982 by strangulation. Her former boyfriend got 6 years & was out in 2.5 years. That was not justice.

Thank you for speaking up about your personal knowledge. Also very sorry that you have experienced the result of gun violence towards women in your circle of friends.

I like how racist this comment is!

I thought lefties were against racism? Guess y'all's Jim crow roots are coming back

@@swimminginthoughts I like how accurate and correct it is. I don't care about whines about "racism" when reality is...reality.

Then you would know that Uncle Tom was the hero in that book, right?

When did due process become a bad thing?

Doesnt matter. They do not need them.

@@grahamgreenfield3765

Try reading the opinion. The court said an individual who poses a threat can be denied access to weapons. “Our tradition of firearm regulation allows the government to disarm individuals who present a credible threat to the physical safety of others,”

​@@EducatedBlackManwell then every single Democrat needs to be banned from owning a firearm.

​​@@EducatedBlackMan"Our tradition of firearm regulation allows the government to disarm..." Treason, right there. Plain and simple.

So, like Thomas, you don’t care who gets killed as long as you get to argue semantics.

@@Ewok751 ?? Semantics?? You are arguing about words . Our freedoms are God given. If you don't like that ,feal free to move😉

@@BigRichfrank no, legal rights are what society decides they are on their own. Divine intervention is the intellectual irresponsibility of the magical thinker.

@@Ewok751 no you've unconstitutionally put stuff on the books. You understand not that long ago California used to give $50gold and a firearms to people that got out of prison??😉 Cope with your unconstitutional laws anyhow you want

@@Ewok751 and it's even better that"" God given ""rights bugs u .. jajajaja