Same, I miss him 😢

Ally Barrett Clearly, me too. That’s why I’m watching my fifth Pete video of the evening. I hope we’ll see him lots more once Biden is sworn in!

Same

You said that 11 months ago. I'm saying that today. I see President Pete in my eyes for the future!

You are all for WAR? Ties to the corporation that brought you bread price fixing. WOOHOO!!!

He's milking the while minority thing for everything it's got. He's such a phony. Yang Gang all the way.

NOMO FOMO Who are your gay friends are voting for?

Same. When will we get representation AND substance? #Bernie2020

You have gay friends???😂

I’m gay, my husbands gay, and many of my gay friends are voting for him.

Uhhhh are we living in the same reality?

He's not the only person who does this, but he's definitely the only one that you're paying attention to... For you information, Yang answered questions more directly than probably any other candidate.

He's not the only person who does this, but he's definitely the only one that you're paying attention to... For you information, Yang answered questions more directly than probably any other candidate.

When has Pete Buttihieg EVER given a straight answer on anything politically related? This comment is steeped in pure fantasy

Facts.

Well said but if trump runs against Buttigieg, you better vote for Buttigieg. We can be picky about policy as soon as we're out of the trump era.

He has no policy

Donald is hetero? I just thought that the kids were artificially inseminated as a cover... ;-P

So you really want to have a first man and not a first lady huh. America's gone down the toilet

While being gay does not disqualify you it also does not qualify you for the job. Same as being black, or being a woman btw. And Pete sounds good at first glance , I was charmed first time I saw him,but the more I learned the more I disliked him. He is just another politicain that is going to take care of the fossil fuel and the drug industry,because they are the main donators to his campaign. NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE UNDER PETE PRESIDENCY. Of course I would vote for a sock and not the criminal in the white house but lets not pretend that Pete really has something to offer to this country. He does not support medicare for all and that is the only thing that should interest the American people. BERNIE 2020

@@MosesPlays 4 years of trump vs 8 years of status with mayo pete? I'd rather not vote at all.

@@y3ee3e That's literally how Trump got elected.

In a documentary I watched it said that, surprisingly, Abe Lincoln was either secretly gay or bi-sexual.

@@MosesPlays Exactly. As soon as I saw this headline, I came for the ratio, lol. I wasn't disappointed, 88k views? 3.9k likes to 3.2k dislikes! 2.9k comments. I felt the same way that you did. I also liked Yang, but after being "botted" to no end, I had to go with Bernie, too. And that's something that I NEVER saw myself able to do, but, the charm is gone for --Romney-- Mayor Pete & his wine caves.

Kiwihame Good comparison ! I'm in AZ...early voting just started...I voted Pete and going in the mail on Monday! But, who ever runs against Trump has my vote!

@@caroleehubbard8380 Nice one Carolee. Get all your friends out to vote too. Best of luck.

@@caroleehubbard8380 Aww it does not work that way kid! #TRUMP2020 #HatersVoteNotMatter

Mickey Jodpatar What doesn't work? I vote for who I want! That's how it works!

“Religious” 😂

Bernie would be the first Jewish President in US History, you don't see him flaunting it as the first thing he talks about on the tonight show. Instead, he talks about policy 100% and his strategy to beat Trump. Pete would get demolished by Trump period.

@@thehumanity0 Colbert brought up Pete being gay you moron. Jews don't face the severe level of victimiztion from bigotry that gays do. Though given that there's enough anti-Semitism among segments of the country added on to him being a democratic socialist, it makes Bernie vulnerabe to be "demolished" by Trump.

He can't even handle being mayor, you're welcome.

@@archraskal Oh give me a break. Pete brings it up nonstop and wholly embraces it in this interview as if it's the most important thing about this election.

London59 Yup. And he is not the right person. No man whose balls in the firm grab of the elite establishment can or will change the dynamic of the current US economic and political system.

@@RedSoloCupx That's exactly his point.

Very misleading when you're talking about a caucus but sure

Sanders did not only win the popular vote, he also is now projected to be the most likely winner in the state delegate count. Now the DNC wants a recount.... you cant make this shit up.

Bernie !

@@ldjcool1 Okay. He won by 6000 votes in the first count, and then by 2500 votes in the final count. Still misleading? Edit: corrected my typos. Damn smartphones.

please remember and vote for the intellect who coined that phrase. yang2020.com/policies

And will continue.........maybe not this year but 2024.

Ultimately meaningless history.

Yeah he became History and will be forgotten completely in another month

Elizabeth McIrvin how? By eating his hubby’s face on national tv and the photo in the papers?

He is history and encouraged many LGBTQ people to feel proud

Natalie DeLorenzo who gives a crap what sex hes attracted to? I care about his policies and him taking billionaire donations, hes not the candidate thats gonna change our corrupt system because hes playing right into it

Brendan Lake yup that ... and he has ties to the app ... Shadow.. that was used at the Iowa caucus for polling. He announced victory before the results were announced. Coincidence? I think not... I don’t trust this guy at all!

well american media certainly acts like it was a minor mistake

Natalie DeLorenzo. Why forget about? It's like someone saying to you that I forget that you're a woman and of Italian descent all the time. Or, better yet, if you're straight, lesbians frequently asking you out on a date because they forget you're heterosexual all the time. Got It?

Natalie DeLorenzo and the very sad part of this is, the Democrats are doing it, they to only care about democracy when is convenient

Ok. But can you be happy for the people who never thought they would see a candidacy like his?

Danny Yankou I’m a 65 y/o gay man, and his ambition to be the next president don’t do anything for the country, Bernie is wast we need for a better future and it does not have any thing to do with sex preferences

@@shavaunjohnson2662 James Buchanan was gay, and he was president, albeit closeted. But gay nonetheless

@@shortstuff780 Since I can't confirm that with him, I'm going to go ahead and be happy for the living people I currently share the planet with.

@@shavaunjohnson2662 fair enough haha, I mean I'm glad the LGBT community is getting noticed, and that Pete is able to run successfully. I just vote based on policies not characteristics. Like for Bernie, sure he's an old White man, but his politics are that of social equality, and social welfare to help those minorities and poor. Pete policies is that if status quo, and continuing the corruption of politics, via rich donors and scamming the poor

How is he going to win without the black vote? Trump is going to win 2020 😂

thisguy We do know how caucuses and primaries work. That’s why we’re so angry. We’re also angry that these goons keep pushing corporate sellouts on us. Pete is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. How about YOU go and educate yourself about what happened in the Iowa caucus. About how Pete’s campaign donated 40 thousand dollars to the app’s development. About how it was made by former Hilary staffers. About how Tom Perez is calling for a Recanvas right as they’re about to do the satellite caucuses in which Bernie carried. About how there are a lot of discrepancies in the results the party is putting out vs what caucus goers and volunteers saw and recorded on the ground. About how Tom Perez has stacked the DNC full of people that openly hate Bernie Sanders. About how Tom Perez has had it out for the Sanders campaign since 2015. About how Pete literally declared victory before any results were out. About how the party’s allies in the media are all uniformally pushing the exact same narrative. About how the DNC just took 1.2 million dollars from Michael Bloomberg and are subsequently changing their rules to favor his campaign. About how they’re also planning on reversing the super delegate rule and the concerted effort of the establishment and their allies in the media to malign this movement. Educate yourself about how this process is actually meant to work, why the Iowa caucus is such a critical point in the race and why what they did is so egregious. Whether through intention or sheer incompetence the will of the people is once again being undermined by the powers that be.

Wow such qualifications.

Yeah that guy in the White House won

First sentence - spot on. Second sentence up to the comma - spot on. After the comma, unfortunately not true. There's an awful lot of petty human beings in this world who can't get over some stigma they perceive.

The viral video of the woman who wanted to take back her vote after she found out he was gay proves that is just flat out wrong. I do however agree that it should be irrelevant, but sadly it still influences people. If he ran in a republican election he probably wouldn’t stand a chance, and in a race where it necessary to convert Trump voters, it could effect it quite a bit.

There was a woman in Iowa that asked for her vote back when she found out he had a same-sex partner.

@@GastonsExpectorate The people who won't vote for him, wouldn't vote for him if he were straight

@@GastonsExpectorate Pretty sure he, as the politician who does lie so blatantly on television, will hurt the public's perception of your sexuality. Shouldn't you go with what's best for the LGBTQ community forward is not symbolism, but policy (as in governance)?

great pens. The roller ball is far more sophisticated than a Sharpie marker. Also comes in large and gel :)

Brian McElwain agreed

The pen is mightier

I didn't know there were other fans of the G2. They actually improve my handwriting, it's a fact.

I'm also a big fan of the G-2, but if you like that you should try a Pilot Precise V7 RT, or they also have a thinner V5. Similar body style and size, but a little more professional and refined looking. They all have the great Pilot balls, but I find the Precise has tighter cleaner lines from better regulated ink flow. Also the V5 is of course amazing in how sharp a line it can really make.

Why Bernie?

Finally, someone sane

@@thequietlion3553 I never understood why anybody would prefer Bernie over Pete. And nobody has yet cared to explain.

Honestly, I’d be ok with any of those people getting elected, because in all likelihood, once they got into office, the policies that any of them ultimately would be able to get passed through Congress and implemented wouldn’t differ much.

People prefer Bernie over Pete because Bernie has been on the right side of history for over 40 years. There is video of him defending gay rights in the 1993 when it was extremely unpopular to do that even in the democrat party. He was arrested for protecting civil rights in the 1960s. He voted against the iraq war when most democrats voted for it. Also, his policies are better and he isn’t bought out by corporations. On the other hand, Pete is funded by billionaires which gives the illusion that he won’t fight for the 99% and will continue the status quo. His campaign donated money to fund the app named “shadow” that screwed up the whole Iowa caucus. It creates the illusion of cheating at the very least.

Grow up

@@Laroushe935 wake up

Andrew how about, Bernie won Iowa. Full stop?

thisguy To be honest, we don’t know who won and because of the appalling way it was run we may never know for sure. If this farce of an election happened in a “shit whole country” we wouldn’t be surprised, but we should expect and demand a higher standard in the US. If the figures they released before the dubiously motivated recount can be believed 🤷🏽‍♂️ (who knows) Bernie got thousands more votes than Pete and as you’re probably aware Pete wants the removal of the electoral college, and believes that in elections the person that gets the most votes is the winner. He can’t have it both ways. They are doing a recount now as there are so many irregularities, with second votes going to the wrong candidate, bizarre coin toss and some cynics are saying that Bernie was winning the last few results to be declared. The DNC screwed Bernie last time, they won’t get away with it this time. Ps You missed the point of my first comment. Substituting full stop for period was a joke, albeit not a good one.

Daniel Ribble , Bernie has been on the show plenty of times. Since Stephen took over the show, no politician has been on the show as often as Bernie Sanders.

You would think Bernie walks on water and is currently being crucified with the way people are talking.

@@PsychCaptain Bern heads are maniacal

@@PsychCaptain with the way corporate hack media portray bernie, he IS being crucified, to the gods of "we secretly love trumps tax cuts but keep acting like we hate them"

Let's get yang on so we can get actual ideas

The whole American election system makes no sense. In the past 20 years there were 2 candidates who had more votes, but lost the election. All because of the electoral college. The USA isn't a direct democracy where it comes to the presidency. You vote for the people that vote for the president. Another weird aspect of the American system: a senators from California represents 930.000 people, while a North Dakota senator represents just 14.000 constituents. The small states have an advantage in the current political system.

It's the way most democracies work. You want to have someone from your riding to champion your causes in the house. It would also be unfair if you win your riding in a landslide victory, but the opposition gets that seat. What are we supposed to do? Go by popular vote and let the parties pick the candidates that they feel should be in the house? I can see the argument that these caucuses should be a popular vote, but I don't see an easy workaround for the actual election to have local representation. It's a flaw in democracy, but a necessary one. Improvements should certainly be made to the election system, but I don't see a move to a popular vote being the answer.

Because america is not a single country at the time it began. It is a collection of separate states and if direct democracy was applied the small states would rather ally with a european country than join the us. Thats why they inflate their importance. Now its not that important to give priority but this is the basis of republicans power that would be gone with direct democracy

@@rvdb7363 That is the basis of the Senate. Every state has two senators, no matter the size or population. The number of congresspeople in the house is dependent on population. The reason for the two senators is because small states like Rhode Island refused to ratify the Constitution without giving provisions to protect smaller states from being bulldozed by larger ones. This compromise works pretty well in Congress because you have the two branches. It doesn't work very well when voting for a president.

I appreciate you lifting this from Seth Meyers. And I tend to agree that the Democratic Party, which has championed the popular vote for a long time, should probably not use the same political system that we use nationally if they want to get serious about the popular vote.

@Lumen Stella wrong

Maybe his sexual orientation means nothing to you but believe me,this light in the loafers man boy will never be taken seriously by other leaders.with the exception of France Germany or the uk.he wouldn’t get nothing but belly laughs from Putin,Kim jong or other Mideast leaders.

Well he has no morals, if you take corporate money, you're a sell out

he has no morals.

@parrotprodigy productions Damn..... Well said.

Yup. Never forget Bernie lost twice in IOWA. In 2015 and in 2020.

@@--Adam Bernie got cheated and you fucking know it!

@@JesusPrice How? Bernie won as many delegates as Buttigieg, so Bernie did very well right

@@JesusPrice Dont engage with them. Everyone knows what happened.

@@seank5515 I think that you may be right.

Yeah but being black isn’t abnormal or a perversion of nature so quit equating the two. It’s an insult to black people.

Ivy Leone hahaha good point

He’s so much more than your silly title.

Pete made that same point in a bunch of interviews...

oh boy, you might a republican or just a bigot.

Like Lincoln for example

😆🤣😂

You can skip all you want but Buttigieg clearly won by the Caucus rules...just get over it, Bernie Bro.

thisguy bend the knee to the movement and support Bernie or vote for Trump. Those are your options. Shut up and pick one.

Trippy Raspo you’re a liar.

@@trippyraspo542, do some research that hasn't been put out by the DNC or buttigieg.

Why Pete and not Jimmy Dore v_v

@@pawsonhips check out the discrepancies going around twitter and then stop caring about SDEs because they're dumb regardless and we know the popular vote totals.

@@pawsonhips unconfirmed, there were many inconsistencies in the SDE calculations.

why is anyone in their right mind not backing yang?

@@makesmefeellikeatalltree8250 Because he can't win. He's campaigning almost exclusively through social media, which means most of the voting population doesn't know who he is. If he tried a more conventional campaign rather than ignoring the majority of the electorate in favor of the kids, things would be different.

Mayor Cheat.

Eddy, don't call Attack of the Eye Creatures a sore loser because Bernie actually won Iowa. Besides that's mean.

@@EdwardHeavrin I think we're all losers if our votes don't count.

@@EdwardHeavrin Maybe go back to CNN?

This is the comments section for the Late Show. Hardly representative of humanity.

@@NeverRubARhubarb I didn't say it was =)

For those who support Pete, this is because when he has a milquetoast Healthcare plan, receives donations from a bunch of billionaires, gave money to the developers of the app that *surprise surprise* crashed during the Iowa Caucus (a group called "SHADOW" of all things) and a record of institutionalized racism within his own town when he was the Mayor (that keep in mind, everyone refers to him as Major Pete), it doesn't take a genius to realize that him being gay has absolutely Zero Bearing on anything anymore. There's a reason why there are only 2 candidates that really matter in this race. Unfortunately Andrew Yang doesn't have enough support but his ideas are worth looking into and adopting when the world moves closer to automation. Bernie seems like the only candidate worth voting for. It's that simple.

Hes dusgusting

Colbert was lost when he left the Report to do this asinine general entertainment show.

I’m European, so obviously Bernie was my favorite in the last election and this one. However, many of his supporters are so obnoxious on the internet, with comments like these, that I’m starting to think it might be better if another candidate gets the nomination.

I remember when Bernie Bros didn't act like rabid Trumpsters. (Seriously, all the supposed bashing of Bernie from the MSM and DNC has done nothing to convince me not to vote for Bernie. But his supporters? *They're* the ones making me second guess myself.)

The Bernie folks are becoming a light version of the Trump folks which is really scary

biostarkick7 You can’t blame people for feeling lied to, when Bernie won Iowa but everyone acts like Pete is the big winner. It is a farce. It sounds like Trumpers because they, like Bernie supporters have the same misgivings about how fair the news and media covers politics. We are sick of 4 networks deciding who runs the country. Trump’s election was a (misguided) reaction to how these corporations and others like them try to keep power by shunting how much info the middle class has access to. They also are attempting to cow us in to being good little Democrats by saying things like the AM Joy line you just dropped on this thread.

“Openly”

Darth Milk. I love it. That’s the funniest I ever heard. I actually got to see Harvey Milk speak when I was a kid growing up in the Bay Area in the 70s. I think he would have appreciated that joke. (He was killed the year after the very first Star Wars movie came out...)

@@jdj830 And when that "Twinkie defense" verdict came out, the city erupted in violence. Lots of injuries, whole line of cop cars up in flames! IT WAS GLORIOUS!! This county is over due for a gay riot.

Exactly, one, thank for saying it . I am leading towards him, and I will probably vote for him,the way he said "What the hell, I am the winner" in Ohio, wow! , whoever goes against trump will mean jack what he offers if can not become a smart eye with him, I realize now Pete can, I underestimated the boy from Indiana. And by now Trump knows you people, you are sexist and homophobics and yet you complain about racism. it was a little harder to put you totally against a woman, but against a gay guy?, of course. That doesn't sound like a nice adjective of you though. Progressive should become synonym of something else.I mean too many "progressive" people wanting to vote for grampa moses, so say it, is the marihuana isn't it?

@@rajasmasala You mean Darth Gaydar!

you need to get out more. he's more milquetoast than Romney.

You do realise that too become president in America you have too have money

@Gerda Buyst because it shows who he will be in favor of. Rich people instead of working class people.

@Gerda Buyst It's relevant because he spent 3 years working for a corporate consulting firm that did some shady shit, and what he was doing there is still a secret. It matters because it seems likely he'll side with corporations over citizens interests.

Mayo Pete Buttplug has lost the election. He just does not know it.

@Gerda Buyst Your word salad sounds like a Russian Bot. Trump has nothing to do with objections to Buttigieg, that's just BS whatabaoutism.

Yawn

@thisguy maybe the left needs to support candidates who aren't garbage. If the DNC props up another corporate shill then Trump gets my vote. Either the left learns to actually be left, or the right starts getting more supporters.

@thisguy I would rather watch this country burn to the ground than watch corporations slowly bleed us dry for 300 more years.

I wouldn't mind a Bernie/buttigieg ticket.

@@amykruse6887 why should Bernie pick a fraud as his VP? There are plenty of good people out there.

@@amykruse6887 But Bernie wants to win. Why would he do that?

If only people were more like you

At least the first few questions you can get the answers to all over youtube and the media. Not saying you should agree with it but there's enough out there. And I have to say the only times him being gay has been the center of attention is when the interviewers mentioned it.

behshad mohebali And you can find answers to all of that on his websites or his countless lengthy, serious interviews on Cable, on the internet, on Podcasts. Stop acting like you care when you don’t even bother to inform and educate yourself as a voter.

@@the_bottomfragger honestly, the interviewers mention it a fucking lot man! And I don't think they don't coordinate the questions with him usually.

@@Qacc6 you won't get the massive support of billionaires by chance that I can tell you.

itachi1958 Trump idiots are out in force today

There's no difference between Donny's supporters and Bernie diehards. A cult is a cult.

​@@crazyforcoffee5950 ​ Cool Story indeed Bro, Buttigieg is the responsible for the Iowa clusterfuck, and guess what? he got a boost out of it! coincidence?

itachi1958 let’s Agree to disagree

@@blt4life112 And you worship the democratic establishment.

David Ortiz Right on. Bernie/Nina 2020

Not true.

Yes he did, he won the popular vote and that is all that’s counted toward the national primary. Bernie had lots of votes changed after the fact so as time goes on he’ll get more delegates and pass Mayor Pete.

Not including the 15% they threw in the trash.

Yes. But that’s not how these caucuses work. Your problem then is not with Buttigieg but with Iowa. It’s not a vendetta against Sanders. It’s a failing of the process.

@@chancock4222 It is and I have lots of problems with Buttigieg.

@@chancock4222 archive.is/kmlZK

Some Guy I’m sure you do and I doubt anything anyone tells you would change that just like how those who like Trump are going to like him no matter what. But this link proves what exactly?

What did come to light? All I hear are unproven conspiracy theories ...

Is this Bernie bro conspiracies! Bernie is not saying there has been any fraud. So it’s basically a draw

@@KillerZeli He helped with the development of the App that caused all the Chaos. Also massive voting irregularities

@@KillerZeli lol unproven conspiracy theories, like Pete made payments of $41 200 to the Shadow company that made the app who's co-founder was a Hillary campaign manager. OR that the Acronym who owns Shadow was involved in the Hillary ads and bot debacle of 2016. Those conspiracy theories??? The fact that Pete had 3 DAYS to have a victory lap while NO ONE knew who won???? Or that Bernie had 6000 more votes yet Pete who has been in 4 place suddenly ties with Bernie or even won?????? LOL, yeah BIG conspiracy when the facts are showing the reality.

@@KillerZeli Unproven??? It´s a FACT that Bernie got more votes. It´s a FACT that Pete contributed 42,00.00 to the App in question. It is a FACT that he claimed victory before any real vote count could be verified. Go online and inform yourself before you make comments like that.

True, but re-read the title "to win delegates in any presidential contest" and he did win delegates, even Biden got some delegates and he was the biggest loser.

Yep unfortunately Colbert shows his weakness for the Democratic party elite. For years now he has peddled junk like others without being critical. This entire Iowa thing is a mess.

He won

@@unitedwestand5205 No, he didn't. Perez called for the recount to stop the massively pro-bernie satellite caucuses from being announced. When even the clinton news network calls into question the pro-party results, something is up.

Benjamin Rudman, Oops!

......but he won with 26.2%

@@Courtesyflush52 Huh that's weird because Bernie got more votes and there are still a ton of discrepancies in the other candidates' favor

Courtesyflush52 that number will change once more of the vote comes in.

There is plenty, do your research, he did a lot of dodgy shit when he was Mayor, he is deeply linked to campaign donations and multiple racism claims.

LOL. Funny. Why do people allege that he "rigged" the Caucus in such a cucked up way? Y'all sound like the Trumpeters who shout about Hillary "rigged the election, but Trump won anyway"

@@LordFraggle I don't actually care enough to research Mayor Pete. He's not the one I'm voting for. Lol

LOL...

Xander Jones 40

And their donation limit is $2800, same as anyone else. These "billionaire donations" comprise a meager 0.2% of his total donations.

mmix86 is that the IDC’s numbers?... why on earth would you trust those numbers after the fiasco that just played out. I personally trust the Sanders campaign numbers over the DNC. The same DNC that rigged the democratic primary in favor of Hillary. Not to mention Bernie Sanders won the popular vote.

mmix86 popular vote, not bs SDE

He won a number of delegates. That's what it's about. It doesn't matter who came first or second or third. What matters is the number of delegates. But I guess Americans aren't used to that due to their first past the post system.

He did win. Not the popular vote maybe, but welcome to how USA is designed and has been run since the very beginning. He did win by the rules, you can call it unfair, that's ok and i agree. But he did win.

mmix86 if 2016 taught us anything it’s that Bernie Sanders has to win by an overwhelming majority in order to account for the DNC’s inevitably “clerical error” / miscounting/ switching Bernie votes to Steyer and deval Patrick “Polk county”/ rigging of the election. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that mayor Pete’s campaign paid 40,000 to the election vote counting app “shadow” that was created by former Hillary people. All just a coincidence.

Are you familiar with the Electoral College?

You're obviously not from the US lol

Paul shrivel Are you familiar with the DNCs tactics against Bernie. Namely the way they released the results in a way that would benefit cheating Pete and finally as they got to the last votes from counties that favored Bernie, DNC corrupt Chair Tom Perez wants to recanvass the votes. The DNC wants to delay Bernie right to claiming a win. This clown and the mainstream media are playing you for a fool. Even if he is your favorite candidate do you think this is democratic? Pete claiming victory before the results were in? Is he serious? Pete having ties to the developer of the app that failed the Iowa caucus, matter of fact a donor to his campaign.

@@nejolo9563 I'm no fan of Pete. But the idea that here in America the candidate with the most votes always wins is, well, foreign.

Paul Shriver Foreign like Democracy. If you don’t believe in it that’s fine but you will eventually be swept by the majority. I presume all Bernie had to do is claim victory with 0% votes in and that should work fine. I suppose that all sports should be played on the election of delegates who can take suggestions on who wins yet the delegates can make whatever decision they choose. Let’s not start on the superdelegates.

sorry, but blacks won't vote for him

Yes a lot of experience being Racist. Google "black police offers and Major Pete."

@JAMES BOND FAN 007 Eh. According to Jesus all you have to do is be really really sorry about your sinful ways and ask for forgiveness before you die. Then you go to heaven. Everyone is a sinner and it doesn't matter to Jesus. So yes, homosexual Christians are going to heaven.

he won by only 2,000 pretty close considering pete is new on the scene and not a national figure like bernie. also looks quite bad for bernie who's support got cut in half from 2016

Sure Will, I guess if you ignore the obscene amount of money he spent in Iowa to do well there because our stupid electoral system puts way to much weight into what a bunch of corn farmers think. then yeah.

@@ThisChangeIsAwful Bernie spent roughly as much on ads in Iowa as Buttigieg did, so what's your point, exactly?

Bernie had 6,000 more votes than Pete. Pete only “won” by 2 delegates due to realignment from non viable candidates like Joe Biden, and the weird caucus setup.

@@Will-cb4wb Pretty close since Pete is accepting as much corporation money as possible and being shady at times, while Bernie has accepted ZERO dollars from corporations, PACS, or any other dark money and has been open and honest for over 50 years. Bernie's entire campaign is funded entirely by only working class Americans desperate for real change. Unfortunately former mayor Pete is just more of the same, and we're tired of the broken system that "more of the same" would perpetuate. #Bernie2020 And here's a link for anyone thinking about voting for Pete, you owe it to yourself to watch this first: m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/erOdoqVjvLOxnKM.html It is long, but it is riddled with facts, exhaustively researched and provides an overwhelming list of sources.

@DrgnFlys The NYT (who also reported the errors) wrote that the errors weren't clearly favouring any candidate. Also I don't think there is any proof of voter fraud against Bernie (yes the rules are certainly not in favour of him but that's absolutely not the same of voter fraud). If you want to share your evidences I would like to see them. (As a disclaimer, between Pete and Bernie I would absolutely vote for Bernie)

Alessandro Fusari I believe Politico explained that YES votes did go to others that belonged to Bernie. I’ll have to go and find it, but it’s definitely true

@@wellnessconnect3368 www.nytimes.com/2020/02/06/upshot/iowa-caucuses-errors-results.html Fyi, this is the article I was referring to. (It does not exclude that the errors could have helped Buttigieg but it says that there is no significant trend, as opposed to @DrgnFlys comment who said "Every single error made in the voting benefitted ... Pete"

@DrgnFlys not sure if angry democrat or republican bot trying to seed disharmony

Politicians have been using a jacketless look for 80 years to convey the idea that they're one of the people and they're not afraid to get their shirtsleeves dirty.

He's kinda 50/50. I do generally believe that he is quite left but it's hard to discern how many positions he'd stick to since he's changed so many.

At times i was wondering if Colbert was trying to trip buttigieg up.

He wasn't the only one who declared victory - and so what, it WAS a victory for him no matter how you look at it, but he's the one being slammed by Bernie supporters because he's competition. They've been ignoring him and concentrating on picking on Biden - Buttigieg knew that would happen so why throw all your cards on the table the first day. Bernie supporters just don't like he didn't do as well as they thought he should - I didn't think he would, he's too far left and Americans don't like change. I knew Buttigieg would be competition as soon as I heard he was leading in Iowa polls - that changed to Sanders, then Bernie - doesn't mean he would or should win

@@jaygray7102 I don't remember hearing anyone else declared victory before the results came in. Compared to what he was projected to get it is a huge victory but he should answer the question of why he donated 50K to the company who made the app. He donated 50K and all the glitches benefited him and some how gave some of the Bernie vote to candidates that no one even knows.

@@Vinnimaniac I heard what he said. He didn't declare a victory - he said "counting isn't complete yet but it looks like..." That's not claiming a victory.

@@jaygray7102 you just said he did on your first comment and now your saying he didn't. Also you just completely ignored the fact that he funded the app itself like he ignored the questions

@UC2J4WrcdAZvlpLNA6NZm6Yw There always is. More people voted for Bernie. There is a 0.1 percent difference between the delegates win and the DNC are calling for a recount. Also Pete Buttigieg gave money to Shadow Inc, the company who made the app for counting votes. Corrupt corrupt corrupt.

Bernie won the most delegates too, but the caucus leaders missed the 2nd grade when they were supposed to be taught how to round numbers.

That is something that i will never understand about US elections.

They didn't count all the precincts. There were still a couple that weren't done, they rounded up to 100%. There are gigantic discrepancies that were NOT fixed. Votes moved to other candidates. This is disgusting.

@@JamesKellyjjk Exactly. For delegates in a primary, it is literally not possible for the winner of the most delegates to not also receive the popular vote. The delegates are allocated proportionally, unkind the electoral college. Bernie won in every category, they just fudged the numbers to make it look like he didn't

He answers way more question than Sanders.

It's not.

@@chadtarver3301 that doesnt mean that he actually answers them.

It is a satirical show, so perhaps it is a joke, but we are taking it literally because of the serious tone.

Jimmy Dore. The useful-idiot of Russian propaganda? Not thanks!

MyDefendor Q what does that have to do with the coin flipping video? don’t look at his political analysis if you don’t want but you’re an idiot if you won’t watch the coin flip just because it’s on his channel

@@MyDefendor Yeah, no, seriously, go watch the video. It's not even a coin toss, looks more like a poor magic trick. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Zt6YgbZ5mrbSo2g.html

MyDefendor Q If you can’t abide Dore you’ll find plenty of other vicious of it. It’s worth watching, even if you don’t stay to watch the accompanying political analysis.

It's called weighted voting. The DNC put it in place in Iowa back a few years ago. It was intended (though they never admit it) to ensure that encumbants (more conservative candidates) always win. It weights rural (more conservative) counties' votes higher than urban ones. They say it's to make it "fairer" but it has the opposite effect. So, if you want to win, you have to get ALL the rural counties, or... nothing. Nothing you do outside of that is going to be good enough. You could have a million more votes, but if they aren't in the right counties, you still lose delegates. And this is the same reason the stupid electoral college is still in use, and similarly is unfair.

2012 Republican Candidate Fred Karger was openly gay but ultimately dropped out

But it hasn’t happened

@@hudsonmcconnell4404 James Buchanan was 100% homosexual.

Homosexuals should stay in the closet.

Remember when everyone thought Lance Armstrong was the coolest? Same thing is happening here.

He never cheated. Good lord people need to stop 😒

@@TheHaileyWhite Even Andrew Yang knows the victory should have went to Bernie. Pete the cheat is a fraud.

@@TheHaileyWhite Pete the Cheat has over 30 billionaire donors. Bernie has zero! Pete the Cheat has sold out to corporations and the pharmaceutical companies. Good luck to Pete the Cheat in the south.

Hillary 2: The DNC doesn't understand shit

It’s disgusting that even Stephen announced him as the winner of Iowa whereas we all know now Bernie won both the delegate count and the popular vote. The MSM keeps pushing this nobody gay dude and for what? He has no substance, no policies to speak of, just empty rhetoric.

@@cachi-7878 They're pushing Pete because they know Biden is a bust and Pete is just a gay millennial version of Hillary.

Invalide_Account there had to be a first time. It should be celebrated too as how things are changing and how people have all grown

If you're an idiot it's irrelevant.

Right but some people are so incredibly dumb that they think it does matter. Specifically talking about people who otherwise would vote for him but change their mind when they find out.

As a straight, white male, I couldn’t agree more. One day the world will only judge a person on the simple fact of whether or not they are a decent and kind person. Anything else is irrelevant.

How old are you? It matters! An openly gay person wouldn’t stand a chance 10 years ago. First black president, first openly gay candidate with a fighting chance, all this things matter. They matter so much that now you can come to youtube and completely dismissed them. That’s a great accomplishment. Please note that I’m not saying he should win because he’s gay. I’m just glad he can try on a level playing field.

Bernie gets credit. Stop it.

I've never been so angry & disappointed at Stephen.!

Idiot

AnusAtTheGate 🍩

Idiot, the shirt shows the sweat. Look at your's.

@@David-ll8bt hey.....SHHHHHHH! Grown ups are laughing.

Clear corruption.

das rite, it should be Jimmy Dore in this episode not this guy kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otqFa9pnrK3Uc5c.html

The End Begins he did #sneakypete

Yes. Do not trust this rat. He has zero POC support and *NO* path to victory.

I think this maybe the tipping point for your country's patience toward the establishment pushing their candidate's onto the uneducated masses, it's not working anymore. The comments here show that.

Do some research. Pete Buttigieg is a crook.

steve crawford so your name is “ Ivan ivanovich “ ? 😅 ok mr.russian troll

extensionsorbit yesss!! After an absolutely disgraceful week. #TURNNOVEMBERBLUE 💙

Final number say bernie wins. Shit has been rigged so he wouldn't be credited by the media.

@steve crawford and even braindead he's more intelligent than you

Bernie has been on this show more often than any other politician. Stop being ridiculous.

@@naylas3908 How am I being ridiculous? The Iowa Caucus results had him tied with Pete.

@@naylas3908 people aren't pissed about how often people are brought on. we're pissed that Stephen would support pete, pete lost to bernie by 6,000 votes, yet because our rigged system pete "won" people are fed up with the system, the fact that some people(whites/rural) count more than other people(blacks/urban) it needs to change!

Same.

WOO

When Bernie loses again, are you going to blame everyone else and be toxic on the internet again? Just wanting to know how long you people are going to keep this up.

@@melbatoast667 IF he loses, I'll vote for who ever is the nominee like most Sanders supporters. Stop listening to the damn media. Just because there's a hand full of psychos doesn't mean we all are. CNN makes it sound like we're out to destroy the country.

@@jessicablacklock5865 I'm listening to you people, the toxic Bernie clan who do everything they can to make the internet borderline unusable. Except it's gone beyond the internet, and at every opportunity, Bernie's toxic constituents boo and heckle everyone who's not him in person. No other candidate's base or surrogates behave this way.

I was just thinking that. Stewart would be running a piece about how fucked up the Iowa caucus was. He wouldn't be propping up Buttigieg with soft ball questions. Sad to see how spineless johns proteges became.

John Marshall to late for that, he’s already in the White House

Adam Tompkins I higher than a 4 year old, not lower than a 4 year old.

Look I found another Ill informed, identify voter. Please stay home.

Boykins lied about being investigated by the FBI sooooo...

Ooop

@@willevans77 here is the actual FBI investigation in regards to the case obtained by AP news through Freedom of Information request www.documentcloud.org/documents/6656989-FBI-Nov-2012-document.html Sooooo... The long and short of it is that the former communications director for the South Bend Police Departmen discovered racial remarks from certain officers and detectives on recordings of 911 and front desk calls and brought this information to Chief Boykins. Boykins asked the communications director to back up some of these recordings as potential evidence and confronted some of the officers in question. As a result, the officers decided to make a federal complaint about Chief Boykins. Soon after the complaint, Buttigieg fired both the communications director and the Chief without listening to any of the recorded evidence. Despite calls for Buttigieg to publically release the recordings, the recordings were never released.

Gayle Lynch they are all blowing by it

@Gayle Lynch Jon Stewart left just when we needed him the most. He was really the only widely watched individual that kept corrupt media in check.

Because he has no polices#repeatpete #petecheats #wallstreetpete

Exactly. He has none.

Well no one asked him so far they all just wanna focus on his gender

@@dannaleehenderson Exactly. A gay shill is still a shill. Only with better taste in clothing and shoes.

online betting favorite to beat trump is yang

It doesn't matter who won most votes. He got the same number of delegates as Buttigieg, and those are the ones that count. Apparently Americans aren't used to not declaring a winner due to their first past the post system.

Royo2013 That what i'm thinking...Pete & Bernie are tied.... both say it's not a tie. Ugh

Bernie is a joke. Yeah let's elect a socialist millionaire who has never held a steady job his entire life. Made his millions off of hard working tax payers like myself. He preaches like he knows what's best for the American people trying to tell us how to spend our hard earned money. The Muppet Bernie and Ball Bag Biden have a combined 80 plus years in office and have nothing to show for it. The whole Dem party is a joke😁😁💩💩.

The problem is that a "win" in Iowa is not important because of the delegate count. It's a tiny number. It's important because it's the first "win" and it often boosts the winner's numbers in New Hampshire. By Buttigieg and the media spreading the lie of a Buttigieg "win" in Iowa, he got a 12-point bump in one poll--bigger than Sanders, Warren, Biden, Yang--anyone. And it was based on a lie. Again, Bernie Sanders won the popular vote by thousands of votes. It's dishonest to state anything else.

but homophobia is still rampant in murica, land of the dumb lol

It sure seems to bother you and tons of other liberals.

It may mean nothing to you, but I bet it means a lot to other people.

@@shavaunjohnson2662 yeah, we should vote for someone on their 3rd marriage, who bangs porn stars. oooohhh....

@@wking8 What?