Safar Cinema those are not only internet arguments mate

@@lemon420 don't call him mate, bro

sometimes quotes can make jokes and give good analogies but yes sometimes people do it too much

@@loganzellman7030 dont call him bro, guy

“No” - Abraham Lincoln

hahaaha, yebbbb

King Henry Wow Abraham Lincoln was so ahead of his time.

'' i never said that'' abraham lincoln

"Best comment"- Abraham Lincoln

"questioning my entire existence" - Abraham Link-on

Lmao this is when you get sent to the gulag

😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂

🤓

"Best one" - Me

​@@blueskybluesky4014yes

funny

Karl Marx NOOOOO

@@sooryan_1018 😂😂😂

@Akash Jacob i did not see that coming😂😂😂

@Akash Jacob SAD

@Akash Jacob WAP aint that bad..

i don't understand how you can be dumb enough to contradict yourself...

Brenton Volkert Can you even read? He did not contradict himself. Here let me put it in simpler terms for you: "In a free society people are unequal, in an equal society people aren't free."

I can't understand how you could be dumb enough not to grasp this statement and the fact that it does not contradict itself.

In other words, there is no freedom if everyone is equal because in order to make everyone equal, freedom must be taken away. Under socialist dictatorships, everyone is equally miserable.

Brenton Volkert I don't see how stupid you could be to write this comment

Because capitalism is an obsolete system that is making our worlds equlity worse

But Communism in its true form actually abolishes government. No Class No Money No Government

Well... BUT people cannot be trusted "to contribute what they can and take only what they need". Until people stop being people, Socialism and Communism will never happen. When the children grow up, they will see this more clearly.

It doesn’t even matter if things are distributed equally….can you imagine every time someone took a test at school and the class was graded on a curve where everyone got the same score? What’s the point in trying?

@@FIyingDumpling BINGO! That's a great analogy! You hit the nail on the head in ONE SENTENCE! Bravo!

"Because you look smart" -Random person of the interwebs

"Things written in quotes look more serious" -Abraham Lincon

“If you treat her like a celebrity, she’ll treat you like a fan” -Gandhi

"lol" -Chandan

"I'm not sure." - my friend's brother

WAP CARDI B FT MEGAN THE STALLION

Marxi B

We Are the Proletarians

@@bagel3707 yes! 😂

Karl Baddie Marx

Besides massive government corruption at all levels the USSR had difficulty with production. To each according to his ability resulted in a less productive society. Always the end result of Socialism.

@@adventuresnorthwest3643 The problems of the USSR had to do with its competition with the United States. Their influence globally was drastically smaller than that of the US and was not founded on exploitation, so they simply couldn't compete. But they weren't left much choice as the US saw the success of the anti-bourgeoisie principle as an existential threat to its own credibility, hence needed to make the USSR fail by any means necessary. Ignoring the embargo's, propaganda and other aggressive anti-communist campaigns of the US, the USSR had to juggle its resources in both military and public welfare, all while rebuilding its economy from the globally unprecedented devastation WW2 had caused due to being the main theater of war unlike the rather uninvolved US. To do this most of its income had to come from the state capitalism, which created a dependency on the very system and corruption it paradoxically sought to abolish. It was the confounding public discontent after Afghanistan sunk it into an economic depression that the USSR collapsed. So ironically(not really), the downfall of the USSR had to do with its capitalist remnants that the US ensured to stay in place. It was not socialism, but the lack thereof that condemned it to economic collapse. In fact in every area were the USSR was socialized, which is to say public facilities(transport, healthcare, education), housing and essential needs, it was far superior to the United States.

I love when people start a comment with "I love ..."

@@FernandoVazquez-ro1nw I love you too ❤

@@onionrangerduck7024 I love you too

😂

Lol

Life in plastic, it's fantastic.

When the joke is funny but the delivery is stupid

I want to like this but it's already at the perfect number..

Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. H. L. Mencken

All truth. Presidents are already decided

Yes of course it doesn't. All systems are just hoax to fool society. World is controlled by a handful of people's decisions irrespective of region or country

So we should just get rid of the voting process?

@L Denke So what's your solution then?

🥳🥳🥳

Lol

You mom is like Soviet union , every man gets his share

@@drunkenmmamaster419 Plot twist they ran out of food in *two days*

Now ,lets learn history.

@@drunkenmmamaster419 mom is a complex social concept that can be even harder to understand than the concept of god People don't get the concepts, too stupid for that.

@Looter Shooter lemon flag?

@@sooryan_1018 yes ofc because lemons are the modern day epitome of evil lmfao

Uncle joe was a savage

@@personifiedtoast4869 every villain is lemons

I can't. I am laughing so hard and my grandma doesn't understand. 🤣🤣

Socialism in one country was his ideology

Debatable, Stalin's specific plans for modernising the USSR could be called Stalinism, although it's very silly for anyone who isn't living in 20th century Russia to claim to be a 'Stalinist'

Can you please point out where Marx prescribed dictatorship? If you can't, then you can't call Stalin a "marxist" - spoileralert: You can't. Two giant propaganda-machines have upheld the notion that the USSR was a communistic endeavour: The sovjets - in order to gain legitimacy within, and the US - to scare the world. Neither of them were right.

​@@benjaminwilliams2264 it's Lenin idea

also when no iphone

@@shush__plz5172 what you mean?

What? 🤣

i hate this quote, because its only if the government does it for the well-being of the Working Class

@@hopseshopsidis its a joke

Maybe it’s the naïveté. Maybe it’s the childish music in the background. Communism will never exist just like the Easter Bunny will never exist. Despots will always rise.

People are scared of both of these words.

chinese did

The Left who gets 'offended' by these facts and wish they can have their socialists utopia.

I V D 💯

Kim Jung Un 😂😂😂😂😂

It changed very long ago. I leaded a party which was against communism and called himself a Socialist, in 1969 similar to Bernie Sanders!

Kim Jung Un Vladimir Putin is not a socialism tirade or believe in communism he went to the American system of democracy what does that tell you you moron

Kim Jung Un give nobody private ownership of property or businesses which leaves THE GOVERNMENT TO COME AND THAT YO $HIT! NO THANKS! NOTICE HOW THEY DON'T EXPLAIN A TAX SYSTEM OR NOTHING? IT'S A PURE SCAM! THE SOCIALISM GIVES MORE POWER TO THE GOVERNMENT. THE COMMUNISM TAKES POWER AWAY FROM THE POWERFUL BILLION DOLLAR COMPANIES IN CORPORATIONS. THEN THE GOVERNMENT SWOOPS IN AND TAKES IT. CORPORATIONS AND RICH COMPANIES ARE BAD BUT YOU DON'T WANT TO BE RULED BY A GOVERNMENT THEY ARE HORRIBLE. THESE CORPORATIONS DON'T OWN YOU, WHEN GOVERNMENTS TAKE OVER THEY OWN YOU. IN AMERICA IT'S PRETTY BAD FOR THE POOR AND LOWER CLASSES, BUT THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T JUST COME AND TAKE EVERYTHING YOU WANT UNLESS YOU BORROWED MONEY AND DIDN'T PAY BACK. A CAPITALIST DEMOCRACY + SOCIALISM, AND A PROPERLY FUNCTIONING REPUBLIC, WITH NO CORRUPTION IS THE ULTIMATE SYSTEM.

true democracy is anarchy.. the US founders knew democracy is just as bad as communism.. that's why we have a democratic republic

Mm I want chicken

🤣

Tell me why SOBER me read this as "I'm too chicken to taste this drunk"

Colonel Sanders - Bernie's predecessor.

“You can’t go into a 711 without hearing a guy with an Indian accent” -Biden You tell me which is worse

"Two men say they're Jesus, one of them MUST be wrong"...... Industrial Disease M Knoffler

@@Tom-js3iz Trumps isn't sexist, he could be talking about males or females or a combination.

@@Tom-js3iz it’s a joke that’s going around, chill lol

I mean he aint wrong. Some girls intentionally hang around ugly girls to make themselves look better

I’m a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world. -Santa’s helper

everything control Big Brother in Israel and USA

Not a real quote

BeeTee Inc no it is real. I said it myself

@@lukeskywalker1557 Ah really? Whats the source?

BeeTee Inc marxism

Well technically WE said it so the quote is OURS (including Lenin)

Who?who?who?who?who?

Lol!

no worries, the chinese knows what to do

wait ? Kangurou ?

The Bourgeoisie.

Anarchy doesn't work

@@Moodboard39 not the answer I'm looking for.

🤣🤣😆😆

@@synchronicity1470 what's so funny?

Get out.

Yo so corny.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

I appreciate this

Go to gulag western spy

Well, sharing is caring as I always say...

Hahahhaha

Ussr athem equal funny hahah😐😐😐

And you will also get supplies from your classmates too... So students in the classroom shares what they have with other classmates and so the whole classroom will never be short of anything and live equally, satisfactorily. That's the power of cummunism/socialism. You want poor students to watch rich students eating potato chips??? Then, it's called Bloody capitalism.

@@mythoclast142 ik, totally not an overused meme format

saying that wanting equality is being envious is extremely shallow. Capitalism wants to sell the idea that anybody can be crazy rich if they work hard enough, but these are all fairy tales. To climb the social ladder is nearly impossible for many and most of the time is based on luck. of course elon musk had it easier, his father was rich ti begin with, so his son could study and invest on the empire he has today. but what if he was born in a poor village of Ethiopia? we would have never heard of him. or what if he worked in a sweatshop? do you think that "with enough hard work" he would be where he is today? Plus it is very simplistic to think that poor people are poor because they put themselves in that situation, that is just not true. "work harder and maybe you will have it better" do you think that those kids digging for gold and silicon 14h a day for maybe 2 dollars a day is not working hard? and the ceo who is making them work is probably working harder, right? I am not a communist, but statements like yours fuel me with anger, ignorance is rampant

i agree, these comment wars are gold.

You gonna share the popcorn?

@@trevorvallo5841 no I'm not some filthy commie. I might for the right price...

Ain't it fun?

Yep

Brandon he said that because he didn't agree with the Frankfurt school of thought that espoused cultural marxism and personally called himself a scientific socialist, not a marxist. You my friend are deliberately miss quoting him to further your agenda.

+A Revolutionary Fox Forgive me, I did not mean to imply that. I just think it’s funny that he said that at all.

Brandon oh sorry, nah it's fine. I thought you were a right wing shill trying to straw man marxism.

A Revolutionary Fox : As a communist I also think we should abandon the terms "marxist" or "marxian". To me, Marx was as useful to the communist movement as Gracchus Babeuf or Peter Kropotkin... And it makes us look like a sect^^

A Revolutionary Fox lmao the Frankfurt school didn't even exist in Marx's time. In 1880 Marx was assisting French socialists in writing the program for the Worker's party of France. Marx did help the party in writing the program but had some serious disagreements with them. Marx had issues with demanding better work conditions and wages from the bourgeoisie. This is where the quote comes into proper context. Marx wanted to destroy the idea that if demanding such reforms from the capitalists is believed to be mainstream Marxism, then he is not a Marxist. "Cultural Marxism" academically speaking, is defined by 3 groups of neo-marxist theorists (labelled The Frankfurt School's 'Cultural Marxism', The Birmingham School's 'British Cultural Marxism', and E.P. Thompson's 'Thompsonian Cultural Marxism') - all of whom critiqued aspects of "mass culture". The Frankfurt School started it all by describing The Culture Industry. Adorno writes things like this in his critique of The Culture Industry: "The dependence of the most powerful broadcasting company on the electrical industry, or of the motion picture industry on the banks, is characteristic of the whole sphere, whose individual branches are themselves economically interwoven." They were the first thinkers to realize there was a 'corporate media' which pushed it's own corporate values and agenda. Adorno says things like: "The Culture Industry not so much adapts to the reactions of its customers as it counterfeits them." The Frankfurt School didn't like pop-culture at all, the Culture Industry Wikipedia page says "Adorno and Horkheimer especially perceived mass-produced culture as dangerous to the more technically and intellectually difficult high arts" - so they believed pop-culture was a risk to Western Civilization. The Birmingham School came after The Frankfurt School and quite liked British Working Class culture. The founders of The Birmingham School were WW2 vets, and their complaints focused on the 'cultural drift' away from the strong, local, community based cultures which they loved, and towards a more bland globalized culture (a process they called "massification"). Other theorists such as Max Horkheimer (of The Frankfurt School) rallied against the application of science without morality. He called this "instrumental reason" and took the Kantian moral position that reason without morality could cause nightmares (such as the application of science during the Holocaust). The Frankfurt School were big against the Holocaust, and contributed to the Nuremberg Trial - which later led to the creation of modern medical ethics boards. This has all somehow been misconstrued as their attack on Western Civilization - even though The Frankfurt School were specifically trying to protect the arts from pop-culture. Later Frankfurt School theorists such as Jurgen Habermas, and Nancy Fraser have specifically critiqued things like Post-Modern relativism and even Identity Politics. The term "Cultural Marxism" has since become a right wing misrepresentation of the (left wing) Frankfurt School. It's now tied into the theory they were "International Jewish Communists" trying to "Destroy American Academia and Hollywood". You can judge whether that's true for yourself.

I"m so weak! LOL

So a non-socialist country wouldn't have a government then?

@@istvanglock7445 whooosh

no government in communism, bad joke

@@kirill3032 it's a quote from richard wolff quote. He was making a parody of right wing arguments. The joke isn't bad you just don't get it.

Happiness.

The Russian kid: sharing is scaring

@Gunma4412 *Latvian

Just as I finished reading this, the anthem started playing in my head.

“Exactly” -Russian kid

Thomas was assassinated by the government (CIAl

There's also Leon Trotsky, who was said to be assassinated by the Soviets during his exile.

Nah it sucks

That's the problem with Marxism, it does not consider any selfishness in the "working class".

Also "work as much and contribute as much as they can".

He isn't advocating for or against either one of these he is just describing the definition of both

P B that’s why communism specifically takes away currency to further incentives through necessity, passion, ambition, etc.

@@dontfrybaconnaked yeah. Maybe he never met a lazy person before who doesnt want to work and only wants to eat and sleep.

There is a Natural law, popularly known as the 80/20 principle. It's a natural law because till now it has always manifested itself in all fields of Reality. And one of the fields is Economics. The minority of the population will always hold the Majority of wealth and the Majority will always own the minority of wealth. Carl Marx observed this in all Capitalistic economies and created a system he thought would avoid this major flaw. And Marxism did just that. No longer did the 20%(or less) own 80% of wealth. Now, only 1% owned almost everything. In short, a state will always be divided into a small number of rich and a large number of poor. Why? It's a natural law. How? I don't know.

@@rajatsinghbhandari9549 How? The possible answer is that the human intelligence varies and the range of this variation is quite large. Also there are different types of intelligence. Not all of them are equally effective to pruduce goods and services. For example a man with higher interpersonal intelligence is good at understanding and interacting with people. So he has a better potential to create an industry than a man with higher philosopical intelligence. Now it will be very stupid and unjust to forcefully bring them at a similar economic class. The person who can produce more for the society will earn more that's the right thing to do. And many brilliant person will remain poor just because their intelligence is not able to generate that much for others. And wealth is nothing but cumulative income of multiple generations. Wealth didn’t come from sky. One valid arguement is that why people should inherit the total property of their parents. Its true that incompetent people get lucky this way without having any real ability. This is the thing i don’t understand. Should a person have wealth which he could not earn otherwise?

@@Gangakinartheke Yeah, I agree that inequalities are natural and equality is impossible and that explains why the 80/20 rule applies to Humans. But that doesn't explain why it works elsewhere, like space or nature. And why inheritance? Because most parents love their children and want them to live an easy life and money helps with that.

Communism works that way

@i get it what decision? And the tyranny starts when government takes the wealth of your ancestors from you and give it to the people who never earned it at the first place. I will never work hard in a socialist country so that the gov can take my money from my children and others get benefited with it.

"that's why I love beer 🍺" - Friedrich Nietzsche

I don’t get this Vladimir putin:

he didnt work either

He was a parasite which mutated into a virus called Communism Varients being Bolshevik Party, CCP, CPMI etc...

you forgot the part where he say he don't work

@@souravchakraborty8861 you know what they say , every political side has it own origin , and the origin of communism is a trash can

Agree.

what moron is an expert in economics and thinks communism is a good idea

@@joebidenisapedophile moron identified^^ oh, the irony

Milith Dheerasekara um no i dont think communism is a good idea

@@milithdheerasekara6957 he's literally right

loloololol you're right he does kinda look like him lmao

F

Tsarism > Socialism > Communism

😂😂😂😂

bruh you're right

In all fairness, before the Taliban kerfuffle, Afghanistan was a "communist" country at one point.

For me too

@@VV_PaVria They were not true communism though. No communist country has correctly applied the Utopian and impossible goal of communism.

Lol I'm literally reading the comments trying to solve this puzzle haha

VieViaPaVria They weren’t communist. It was never established. The people rebelled and won.

@renhyuckwrld They are both bad, "The goal of socialism is communism" - Lenin

@@philipvaray6520 how are they both bad?

@@mochees if they're not bad then name one country which developed well after communists started ruling it.

@@philipvaray6520 lol lenin is a single theorist and plenty of marxists disagree with lenin.

@@antrikshdixit8568 also, you do realize that's a terrible argument given how relatively few socialist/communist countries there's been right? socialism has only been around for about a century. all the major socialist (no country has actually been communist) countries have also only been one ideology - Marxism-Leninism (or Marxism-Leninism-Maoism)

not in all families

Families are not Communist, if they have Parents who support their children and bring them up to be strong ambitious Individuals who strive for Achievement. What you were describing is a bunch of people living under the same roof, like a crack house. Oh wait, you are right about Communism ! 😆

@David Anewman Exactly, only those who don't love their families, would choose Communism.

@David Anewman This is America. I'm Cuban American, escaped Castro in 1961. Learn not only English, but to love this Country with all of my heart. Graduated with Honors, served 10 years in the Military. Retired with 30 years as a Law Enforcement Officer. Got my Teaching Degree while working with the Patrol. Everyone can make it in this Country. If they want to... "I don't pity the poor, nor envy the rich. I live my own life". 🙂

@David Anewman Only the Socialists. Then they started building rafts.

HCM ruled Vietnam from 1945 until he died of a heart attack in 1969. He _was_ a dictator.

@@ancap_rem Many world leaders have died in office. Is Kennedy a dictator too?

i dunno about HCM himself but if he were alive when Vietnam unified, the communists wouldve kicked him out anyways. they kicked out the true revolutionaries, sent them running to France and USA

Stalin wasn't dictator, read some his books

Communism is Marx's version of socialism. It's worth reading "Essential Works of Marx" if you are interested. Outside of Marx's tradition (Lenin, Stalin, Mao), socialism gets dark and antisemitic. Inside of Marx's tradition, it's pretty dark and antisemitic, too.

@@soulcapitalist6204 Thanks! I'll check that out sometime.

@@GentleeDuckie Try the video 'Socialism for Absolute Beginners' by 'Second Thought'. The Name says it all, but you shouldnt stop there and watch a Non-Socialis named 'Some More News' talk a lot about Socialism

​@@GentleeDuckie leaving a comment so I can get back.

Democracy at work, anark, and vaush are good places to start. This video was trash, regret ending up here, second thought has some good stuff but I don't like some of his views regarding authoritarian states like china.

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others" - George Orwell

@@msosa9735 Actually if you research the Incan Empire and its M'ita labour system you'll see that this proto-socialist system was ever-expanding and created fantastically efficient transportation and agricultural systems. The problem with it though was that it required the empire to continually expand, but I guess you could say that about GDPs today.

👏👏👏👏💚

🌟༻🅹🅰🆈🅵🅰༺ ✓ • 5 years ago marx was an egalitarian. he called egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies a type of primitive communism because everyone worked together.

@@MGuyGadbois ah yes those word Im bout to say at Hitler

Yup. Liberty if always the first to fall

I would say that there has never been a country where the state has not been influenced and even owned by the financial system and big corporations. The free market that most so called libertarians advocate for is already a reality and that's is why we live in a economical Darwinist jungle where who has the most money can do whatever they want.

Somalia is free market capitalism

ultimately society needs some form of coercion to function. The difference between socialism in all its forms & capitalism is that in the latter you may voice your opinon without fear of assasination, poisoning or imprisonment, as in Putin's Russia

@@guyvert49 - you have authoritarianism mixed up with socialism. Putin's Russia is an authoritarian, capitalist oligarchy.

Wait, this is true but the soviets is communist so what?

@@martin_xv dude, do not ever doubt the red baron

@@martin_xv this is where the stalinism and marxism mixes up... because in terms of marxism ussr was still in the middle step of socialism (for more than 50 years) while in terms of stalinism and stalin ideas, he was already pretty happy with the ussr so there was no reason for him to abdicate the power

@@martin_xv they are not communist they are socialists

Is this from a book? If so what’s it called i would be interested in reading it

If only I understood whatever this meant

@@thegoofiekilla it is a reference to the terme ideology defined by Marx. It means that the poor want to survive, but due to ideology they refuse to understand the cause of their suffering: capitalist exploitation. (see marx for the definition of capitalist exploitation and the surplus theory)

@@MsMattmatt24 THIS. So many people say things that are about dismantling capitalism or have communist ideals, but when you say 'communism' they freeze. My mum and her generation and the generation before had widespread communist beliefs in Thailand but when I said her favourite band was communist she looked shocked and didn't understand.

@@fairy5668 true. I think that if people would know what communism is really about, the vast majority would agree with that school of thoughts. Because at the end of the day, it is about freedom, justice and fraternity.

@@MsMattmatt24 Freedom and fraternity? Hardly. Communism enslaves people through the subjugation and ownership of their labor. The only groups of people who stand to benefit from communism are the ultra poor, the lazy, and current communists. Everyone else stands to gain nothing and lose everything. Communism is akin to slavery in pre-Civil War America, but expanded to include everyone.

I'd say selfishness is the true evil. :(

I would say that selflessness is the root of all evil. All Authoritarian regimes on the left or the right advocated the repression of the "self" for the greater good of the collective. Sacrifice yourself for others. Let ants be our model. 🤔😎

The success of socialism is still worst than the mistakes of capitalism

Equality is the goal of most human beings. Your above statement regarding corruption is the reason why complete equality is never obtained.

@@adventuresnorthwest3643 Then there is equity to consider.

Well u gotta serve to get served back

Yes, comrade, it should

@@thegod2291 username checks out.

@deadshot So

Samething.

Hehehe.

Devote your life to susej read susej backwards

@Hello there, how are you doing this blessed day?

“Dictatorship of the proletariat” because dictatorship under the bourgeois is beyond awful, i’ve seen this argument before, i think its important to point out every political part that isn’t a people’s party serves to establish or maintain capitalism so its important for the dictatorship of the proletariat to have one representative party

All of the answer,you've got a very correct and brilliant answer!you are correct,dictatorship of proletariat,not only proletariat''it's also communism and socialism,is a single communist party system DICTATORSHIP...

​@@lcdream4213Dictatorship actually recreates a set of social hierarchies which Marxism originally aimed at destroying. You can't want a classless society but wanting a class of it to rule everything.

Dictatorship of the proletariat means that the state is controlled by the working class instead of a capitalist oligarchy.

Philosophy left the chat

@@Shivamg415 …and logged out, then deleted the account and destroyed the linked devices

Yes

"one inspirational quote spoke by a famous historical figure" -omar salem

Well said

Tear in my eyes

ok Omar, I felt ENLIGHTED!

@@nemoh1649 me too😜💪😂

Lol good point

I also think that there are times where one system works better than the others. I think in time of war socialism works better.

I do not agree, according to Marx himself that systems fails because of the contradictions that creates (historical materialism) , so if we had a system that doesn't create contradictions (communism) it would not fail, but socialism does tho because it has classes still.

That, and people are flawed and corrupt and power hungry and evil. So no system created by man will ever work. Thus, the smaller system the better

@@liberalizzzm4908 Principally because Socialism is really a precursor to Communism.

i have a feeling marx explained that somewhere in his 1000 page book

Quite the visionary.

Well, probably that's the proof that communism would have fit better to the situation

Not sure if you’re saying that’s what they would use as proof, or if you believe that’s proof and you believe that communism would have helped us.

@@Betweentheraindrops8 I think that communism would have dealt with the situation in a different way, eventually better

I didnt get it

Charolastra Could it be a joke about Ad hominem?

@@cambridge5770 It's a statement about how neither Marx not Engles practiced what they preached.

Nissan GTR better than M3

@@MaskHysteria I thought it was about him getting the peanut shells stuck in his beard. Thank you for explaining this.

Actually he is not comparing…….he is actually lying through his teeth. This is what Socialists do…..lie, deceive and kill by the millions. Sweden is an “Open Market Economy.” That was lie number one…..need I go on?

@GiaHuy Nguyen Van there’s no hope trying to convince people that are brainwashed by century long propaganda about communism

@GiaHuy Nguyen Van no

@GiaHuy Nguyen Van The other guy my friend is the most stereotypical conservative capitalist American ever.

@@AlexGuzman-ff1ud To be fair I watched this video with an open mind and capitalism still sounds like the best option. Giving that much power to the government through socialism and communism is never good. Look at how corrupt they already are. Giving them more authority wouldn't help anyone. And when they describe communism in the video they say "people work together to be happy, healthy and free and only take what they need". In a utopian world where people actually act like this and the Dictator wouldn't abuse his powers, sure I would support communism. But in reality people are greedy, they will always take more and work less and the dictator will abuse his powers.

Oof

5 seconds later he would be shot in the head

Nek minute

Gobble Corral made me the GREAT man I am today.

what if one needs everything?...my precious...

Lol 😂

Golden corrals doesnt exist in socialist countries only the U S A I think imma go make a completely over the top scooby doo type sandwich just cuz i can

I need more than the next guy. So either get out my way, or fight me for it

Jacob Wood Jacob wood got no wood

@@nathangg8429 people have right to kill another people to survive. Because i can kill you than you can also kill me so since both of us is afraid of death we give our 'right' to kill others to the state of law so we can safe and survive this live. As long as people in society is still give up their right to the law of society there are no free society and because the societies is not free society therefore there are no free country. US is not the close to what free country look like since the hierarchical law still chain up the society to abide it so US is just the same as another countries in this planet not more free than the others, since the different is just what law should enacted and dont, it not make one country more free tha others because that country is still have that law that individual give their right for it.

what do you even mean by "Free country" ? As long as there is law & order its not free. there has never been and there will never be.

@@nathangg8429 that is a lie, one of the most free countries in the world in probably new Zealand

@@nathangg8429 new Zealand is also ranked 3rd in the world for economic freedom

Well they were elected, but not by the people but by the main party and some block parties. The problem was: These poeple basically controlled the party that elected them. So once again, humanity destroyed what could've been a great thing