Only thing i know about over watched ....they butchered tracer and removed her ass

Thanks! I was actually going to comment on this but I saw your comment.

They also are doing open queue which is what overwatch should have stuck with, I love role queue as it makes games more consistent but it's a queue time nightmare and has caused them to need to fix the game in so many other ways that it's gotten to the point they removed a tank and have made countless bad decisions, so while open queue has its flaws, it's just clearly the optimal way to go as long as you dont create characters like brig that specifically counter a whole strategy, rather than just a hero, If a single hero can stop the hardest to play strat (dive) without any effort, ofc its gonna ruin the game but instead of fixing that hero, they just ruined the game further sadly. It's just now brigs world and were all suffering in it as they legitimately made holistic gameplay changes based off one hero and if you're in that situation you should probably look at the one hero not the entire game 😂

Yes this. Overwatch has become Counterwatch. It’s an ever growing annoyance. I am really intrigued how concord handles their system.

Great insight

It's on PC too.

Luke has no idea what he's complaining about he just likes to be negative for views

@noodles9345 counter switching is literally the gimmick of overwatch, though

@@THawkMedia not really

thats a real smart human mentality , we're at times were ppl score a game 3/10 2 mounths before its release XD

The o ly smart thought in this moment section and video....u must be older than 25

Same here. I really don't know why everyone is bitching. Beta is around the corner, just try playing the game before you write it off.

@@aaronclay4665you must be younger than 20 then cause this game looks like shit lol

Because your beta

yeah, I literally see no reason to buy this as FULL game when there is Destiny 2 WITH campaign and PvP modes.

Total Control in Halo Infinite is basically Control in Destiny Crucible without playing Destiny

@@Disconnis that might be helpful if PS ever gets Halo lol I'll keep that in mind

@@itsyorpal_bish😂😂bro doesn’t know the struggle for pvp players in Destiny especially PS

Because if they do some how make a hit it makes more money than all those losses combined

​@@TheStickz6 exactly

Its alot like the music industry.

Lol they clearly chasing trend but they are late

Chasing a trend is easy and relatively safe. The problem is, when the market is saturated with it,it ironically turns unsafe, because you have to compete with everyone else+the top dogs. It's like selling,let's say, a pencil. If you just sell the most generic pencil,it gets lost in a sea of generic pencils. Meanwhile a colorful pencil with, idk, infinite eraser, that gets more attention even if it is riskier

The design is typical 80s like Flash Gordon, the problem with todays gamer they hate just everything 😂 and ex devs from bungie work on this game so it means movement is addicted and feels great.

​@@deathloop935Nope, it just looks meh. Get off the high horse.

@@deathloop935the game looks like shit lol

@@deathloop935You can’t talk to these new PS fans bro,all they want is 3rdperson over the shoulder cinematic games and act like they’re “real gamers” because they don’t play multiplayer

and then they got a good one in Titanfall 2 and no one bought it.

I don't

@@ryuhayabusa3540 booooo

@@vincevirtua I still believe the campaign in TF2 is overrated. Loved the multiplayer but the single player was so booooring.

@@vincevirtua didn’t titanfall 2 sell pretty decently? But yeah, sandwiching it between cod and battlefield… what are we doing bruh

People are used to free to play. I agree though that I prefer a $40 price to tamper the microtransactions, though Helldivers still has a lot of them.

@@bjf9304 I agree, people are used to free to play. I play a lot of free to play games and the microtransactions for some of those games are nuts. The first time I actually spent money on microtransactions was helldivers 2 for two reasons. 1, the game was so amazing that I wanted to support the devs. 2, I didn't feel like I was being ripped off by paying $15 for skins. $10 for actual weapons and stuff I use is good.

​@professormilly2021 plus armor actually has different Perks

$40 for a pve co-op game and $40 for pvp game are two different things these days

@@singmysin I agree but if the system holds true you won't get a free PVP game up front with $40 skins or content updates later.

@@massterwushu9699 saaaaame

This.... concord might be great. But first descendant looks the best. But crying about 40 bucks for a game ...... gamers are fucked if they cry over 40 buck games, I just think it's a loud moronic minority

same

@@massterwushu9699 same

I think it will have moderate success.

While I can see your point, I think it is more that there is a huge influx of hero shooters are coming up suddenly. At the moment we have Overwatch 2, Team Fortress, Paladins, and Star Wars Hunters which just released. Then coming up we have Marvel Rivals, an upcoming Valve hero shooter, and Fragpunks. This isn't counting for all the other live service FPS we have and are getting. Yes, we did have WoW, ESO, and FF14 but how many MMO's quickly died all trying to hop on the hot trends. It is nice to have options, but those games also should try to stand out from each other. I don't really know what Concord is doing differently other than being a highly polished game with some ongoing cinematics. Marvel Rivals has the cool destruction going for it while Fragpunks has an interesting card system (which seems similar to another game). With Concord you have the extra barrier of having to pay $40 on top of needing PSN which is a monthly fee not available to every country. I worry more about the longevity of the game when it has other similar games to pull it away from with a bigger barrier to entry. And for every Civilization like game we do get, we have about 20 similar FPS GaaS games. It isn't exactly comparable. Ara also seems to be doing something a bit different as well than Civ 7 to stand out.

that is how it is when you the game Seems to similar to something else. no one will buy a cod copy if they already have cod. you have to be different and be very clear HOW you are different with your messaging. so everyone thinking its another OW when they already HAVE OW is a big issue. you want to make a game? be different that you arent comparable.

@@Drstrange3000 Maybe but I say let Concord do its things and see if people like it but acting like this game's a 3/10 when we're 2 months out from launch is a stretch. even if its a crowded genre, at least let the game prove itself

The Hero Shooter audience normally sticks to a handful of games. And there is a graveyard of MMOs firvtgecsame reason. WOW and FF14 are exceptions to the rule. Concord will be competing with Overwatch, Aprx Lrgends, Valorant, Marvel Rivals, Destiny, and Valves Upcoming Deadlock. As well as other live services like Fortnite, Hell Divers, and PUBG. Then there are extraction shooters, though those might have a different audience.

Overwatch is free, destiny PvP is free... Also on every platform. It will be an uphill battle for Concord. Trust me.

It's not limited. It's literally 16 characters. That's a lot for base roster.

@@CrystalMang0 Limited as in during a set of matches one team could only pick from 8 possibly randomly chosen set of characters and the other team picks from the other 8 as opposed to getting the option of the full roster every game. Maybe that's not what they're doing but that's what I gathered from this video.

​​@@MusingsMusesit's probably to help with the staleness that overwatch metas can hit, if sojourn is op, shes played on both teams every match and than you nerf her and Cassidy is now on both teams, than you nerf him and widow is the hitscan pick, and it just cycles and while I think balance would solve this, overwatch cant balance but also this is now an incentive for them to balance these heros well, since if ones just objectively better, they arent gonna abandon their balance philosophies the second the going gets hard like ow and just tell you to bascially hard lock sojourn like the enemy every game if you wanna win. Because the way ow has it just barely works although its boring and stale but if they have a sojourn in this game than the games unplayable and you cant leave it in that state the way overwatch can just leave sojourn op because both parties have access to it, this is actually how paladins fuctions in ranked and it's always forced them to balance their heros well, until they merged pc and console which completely screwed that games balance but until that change I always marveled at how well paladins balanced their game compared to their much more successful brother overwatch lol

It's definitely been that way.

Warframe, lerhaps a good safe zone?

The only non scam live service games are the free ones. A good example would be xdefiant or Fortnite. They’re free, and still better than most of there competitors.

@@Zynet_Eseled warframe is one of the worst examples of live service games and the (relatively few) fans of it suffer from stockholm syndrome

​@@clankfishyup

It's not free to play, so the "modern audience" is already priced out.

god i hope not. I hope Sony loses big money with this game

​@@Cryptic0013true.... the worst thing g to happen to gameing is " free to play" Sad

@@aaronclay4665free to play is good. Look at a game like Fortnite. There’s thousands of modes, maps, and things to do. There’s basically infinite content because the community keeps making more. Not to mention the regular modes, which get massive updates every few months.

​@@HahahMamamanfortnite isnt f2p anymore, it's a platform in if itself. And what it's done is cool and all but not every game can di that even if they wanted too and only had the players best interests at heart because you need to be as big as fortnite to pull it off so I would rather fortnite not have been made and the gaming industry gets to remain healthy than fortnite succeeding at the expense of the entire gaming industry

Bingo....

But helldivers was genuinly unique and felt really good to play, whereas here you have this game that just looks like a standard team shooter with some (imo) unappealing designs and nothing really going for it from what we've seen Yeah it is prob receiving more hate than it should because of that, but at the same time it's understandable

Plus hd2 is a sequel to a game that a lot of people liked and didn't really expect to see a sequel of. The change from a top down shooter to third person on its own was big enough of a change to Garner some interest. Concord just feels bland all around.

@@SpardasTechReviews Weak argument. You’re saying HD1 that sold 2 million copies warrants evidence HD2 would sell 12 million copies in weeks? There was barely any hype or hate when they revealed HD2. What I’m saying is our intial reactions doesn’t quantify any hint of success in a live service game because that’s how volatile live service is. In only takes a few thousand players to love the gameplay and spread it word of mouth until it snowballs into the millions ala HD2

People new that it would hit not this big but still. A lot were really hyped after first trailer. Plus it's the second part, so they already had a small, but a fanbase. I don't think I've seen any negativity after announcement. Here on the other hand. I don't think I've seen anything actually positive. Maybe open beta will change the tides

Man I was thinking the same thing! A $40 investment into a video game isn’t worth it? But then these same ppl will go and spend a bag on MTXs and cosmetics. Gamers can be so finicky sometimes and will complain about any and everything.

Eh, it's more like spending $40 just to get into a casino. Calling money spent on a competitive online multiplayer game with crates and skins an "investment" is really stretching the definition of that term beyond all recognition.

​@@meek6119What? What you talking about? A videogame is not an "investment" wtf

That's not the issue ... the problem is that the competition is free to play with mtx this game is Pay to play with mtx

I hope its optimised mate its a basic pvp, not gta 6

​@@MxrkJJok and?

Are you basing this on anything? Or are you just talking?

Unless they're going destructible environments and object physics, there's not really a huge amount (or need) to optimize. Their focus should be more on game and server stability, and minimizing bugs. Having things not work when and how they're meant to will irritate players far more than fps dips.

​@Thorn_416 Sony always produce non buggy optimized games for the most part....that's what it's based on. Much like you can count on blizzard to launch shit games or Bethesda to launch trash buggy shit. Sony launches quality games......from there studios. This is not up for debate, u can not like the games but u can't question the quality

Game Is for weebs and furries.

We have too much singleplayer games

hold up... its not even FTP?!

@@Thepvpguy128 What is that suppose to mean? If anything we don't have enough. Or heck we don't have enough offline single player and optional offline multiplayer modes incase the multiplayer doesn't pan out so we rely on bot matches.

@Deliveredmean42 "we don't have enough" do you guys ever pay attention? If you watched the Playstation and xbox showcases it was 98% of singleplayer and coop games. What you guys even complaining about?

@@Thepvpguy128 Not complaining here. Tho I did suggest some offline multiplayer mode if those games don't pan out. You know the problem when multiplayer games that had fun concepts or little nuggets of brilliance every once in a while? It be too bad if you can't play those in the future given the always online nature of live service games. I am just kind of worried more than complaining. I did heard that the multiplayer games I am certain some people want to be revived by Sony aren't being made. Altho its probably for the best those remain gone given the current landscape. Unless the community revive them themselves on PC.

Okay?

Smart

Super weird thing to say

Yeah… Take notes from the dying PvP community in that game.

yeah, I guess Luke doesn't play destiny too much and he has said before he has motion sickness with some games so I guess that's a factor too while switching between 1st and 3rd person

@@saberzer094 luke is a baby honestly . The motion sickness thing is fine and legitimate, but a lot times he’s being baby

Once Luke has an opinion on something, he’s going to stick to it. Like he literally found the most negative article to read and talk about when everyone else who played the game said it was a fun game with cool mechanics

"Hrrrmmm, well actually..." I get that nerds tend to lack social skills, but it's honestly like some of ya'll aint even trying. No one likes that person who is constantly correcting people even when they're joking around and aren't meant to be taken seriously. So stop being that person.

I don't understand it either. I can't say that though or I will be called a hater. Having spent my time giving these games an honest try, they are exhausting and not worth it in the end. I'm tired of comments saying, "give it a try." I don't need to. I am currently playing Star Wars Hunters and don't see me playing long term. I'm ready for the Live service formula to change. I really don't like battle passes and I want more new content than just cosmetics.

They're like 60-90 seconds each, so around maybe 60-70 minutes of cut scenes over the course of a year. In comparison, Baldur's Gate 3 has more than 174 hours of (fully voiced) cinematics in the game. If this game fails, it won't be because of the costs of making cutscenes.

Targeting ❌ Baiting ⭕

man , ppl already have prejudice to hate , no matter if the game is good or not , they're gonna hate it ( and they are not to blame after all its companies fault for making lot of shit live service games ) its like with ubisoft , whaatever the fuck they make , ppl gonna hate it , i see even ppl hating AC shadow and starwars outlaws been hated when they game isn't even released , and thats really hard to outcome , personally i never judge a game before trying it myself ( after all i can always pirate it or just refund it if i bought it )

@@alaa341g personally I think Star Wars outlaws looks pretty good

@@BigmanBrando yeah me too , but just goo see the dislikes on its videos if you have the chrome extension

@@BigmanBrandoyou are in the minority but if you think it looks good then im glad at least someone will buy that game lol

@@BibFortunasBarber never said I was gonna buy it. I’m 100% waiting until I watch a review. It may look good but it’s still Ubisoft 😂

Every game genre is chasing trends after the first successful game. Look at souls games the only reason those are getting the type of scrutiny as this is because it’s a live service and gamers have a hard wire hate for those types of games no matter the number of successes.

Sounds like the only media source u trust is the one that shares your " I hate Sony " agenda...... Do better kid

Bingo

What? 95% of games don't have diverse casts like that.

You're online way too much if that's your concern. You also have bigger problems in your head and life if that is your biggest concern for a game

@@aliquidgaming1068 You have bigger problems in your head if you defend this soulless slop.

@@yarikistaken The concern will be that you think he is defending it.

@@Stryker-K 95% of games are Steam trash made by two guys on zero budget. Try refining the sample to AAA games that get significant media coverage, aka the ones anybody cares about, and that percentage flips.

This is how I'm feeling with Star Wars Hunters. It is a fun game, but the grind gets old.

It's a different world. Overwatch, for all the issues it has, offered a lot that was new and interesting in 2016. This isn't nearly as novel, and there are a lot more options for this kind of game today than there were games directly competitive with Overwatch in 2016.

back when games were games instead of storefronts

​@@EllieP.-hi5fxA lot of new & interesting do tell. What was so new about overwatch?

@@PerfectFitGE8 goty

I don't think it is, people were shocked when it released like that. And the higher ups were trying to chill the crowd with tons of promises of long lasting support, and! They promised to never lock any gameplay content behind the paywall, that was the part that actually ruined Ow in the long term. But this game is releasing now, not 8 years ago. Now we have free ow2 and other free to play games in close gameplay paradigmas.

Its probably still gonna flop. I mean game requires PSN. So they are pretty much declining the money for the game from almost 200 countries. And in general its pretty nothing new in the gaming.

@@henrikaskavaliauskas6639 most multiplayer games require some sort of account fortnite requires epic ubisoft has it for xdefiant it's not outlandish

@@henrikaskavaliauskas6639 the fuck ? the game is playstaion , of course you need PSN ? like wtf are you talking , it like saying that you want to watch netflix but without the account , netflix also didn't exist back in the day in lot of country and sportify also , the entire playstation money came from PSN , they are even selling consoles at a loss

​he snowflake it's been like that for a long time

It's gonna gonna fail. Helldivers 2 had a good run but now it's slowly losing ppl

That PC gamer article is the little positive buzz I've seen. And access media previews tend to be positive in general. Most people aren't talking about the game one way or the other.

I don't think he was completely shitting on it, but I understand some skepticism considering there's alot of hero shooters on the market. I think the game will find a niche but don't see it being super popular

exactly , like they always say , haters gonna always hate , nomatter what

I'm doing my part

People need to understand that 'exceptions dont make the rule'

They release psvr2 :D thats enough reason to not trust anything that was done by crying ryan.