One of Iran's kings said this too

​@@LichKing-zj8obCyrus?

Emperor Suleman:- We conquer both😎 we are unstoppable 🇹🇷 ☪️

He said after slaughtering thousands of civilians.

mehmed the conquerer was kind + even if that happened there is no war without blood@@Ibidesgsindl

nope it was a fall the fall of the Roman empire

​@@Vincent_Sallownah... more like a new beginning 😎

This marked the rise of Third Rome ❤

​@@tasnimsaadbinrafiul5220ottoman is not rome

@@SacredWarrior999 sorry to disappoint u 😅 Sultan Mehmed ll is also know as Kaiser e Rome ..... he conquered constantinople ..... the former capital of second rome and made it his capital ...... also due to geographical location the third rome simply replaced second rome ..... that's the reason Ottoman Empire is also known as third Rome ..... just like byzantine empire is known as second rome ...... What's more Sultan Mehmed ll is also descendents of a Roman princess that was married off to second Sultan of Ottoman Empire .. making him more legitimate to claim the rome See ... this is how Ottoman Empire aka third Rome became famous

Not just the Ottomans, The WORLD will!

I am not an Ottoman nor Turkish but I believe his greatness should never be forgotten 🙏🏻

Sufi he was

@@active23ra Not exactly. But yes he did believe in fortune which is haram.

@@imran98T he was a Sufi, he himself said his teacher was shaykh shamsuddin,and shaykh shamsuddin was the spiritual Khalifa of Hazrat Haji bayrami wali ,he was a Sufi ,just as all the ottoman sultans were Sufis and all had spiritual guides

Babur would still smash him in everything though…

Mehmet 2:nice joke😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@theredmask3525 He has more than 70 poems and He creator of mortar weapon, the cannons that he made was used until the 1750s

@@theredmask3525 avg grek

@@timurjoro1995 Who is this Babur? How old are you kid😂😂?

Yes, one city could have destroyed the ottoman empire...... sound logic.

​@@Ibidesgsindlyoure so so uneducated

​@@Ibidesgsindlit wasn't only a city, the Peloponnes were still roman and they also tried to ally itself with italian city states.

@@mirfallteinnameein6343 Wooooooow that could have definitely defeated the numerically and technologically superior ottomans. A few city's and villages that hated each other more than their actual enemy.

@@IbidesgsindlCry dude who stopped you

Onun dünyayı istemek diye bir derdi varmıydı sence?

​@@konulyHe's just comparing the normal person vs the great conqueror

​@@konuly Allah wanted us to conquer and expand for we are supposed to be the strongest of all

People at 21 in 1453: I want a loaf of bread People at 21 in 2024: unlimited potential and opportunities, if they choose it

Filistini siktim​@@konuly

Mohammed *

@@GhGh-sj4wb Turkish side of me slipped in xd

⁠@@konuralpsansalyasar8982 im not Turkish but yeah😅👍🏼

sources please

The most precious words

I suspect priorities have changed💀💀

@@mrcazzovic7960why dont we change it back

But you can do things that can benefit you and your family@@mrcazzovic7960

​@@Yousiftabrawe live in a modern world 💀

​@@LambdaMaleLiberalism made us weak

Bladwin was 16, That is incredible

@@clemensa5770 He was incredible too...But destiny was with Salahuddin...

@@user-ov5ji2pr6h Baldwin beaten him tho

@@clemensa5770And he retook Jerusalem though...

@@user-ov5ji2pr6h But he waited for Baldwin to die of cancer

Comparing kings to common people?

Cmon bro. The common folks back then qere prwtty tough too​ thoughi wouldnt like to die because of a paper cut @@CocaineBear25

@@CocaineBear25 hes comparing what 21 years were able to do back then.

😂😂😂

@@a.bygoner21 years old wwrent able to do thay back then. They would either spend rest of their lives working as a farmer until they die at 30. Or die at war or diesese. If you are really using mehmed as example you must be not very smart. Considering he was born as crown prince. Unlimited resources, and nations greatest minds teaching him how to be a ruler.

Also Imam shamil of Dagestan. As well as abul rehman

insh Allah bro

InshaAllah ❤

A thief that’s what he was

@@MrJonnyl123 nah youre just jealous at how powerful muslims are. You are the real thief. The Byzantines were thieves, and so were the Romans

@@MrJonnyl123 Bro, some 6 yr olds jealous

AMEEN🤲

🇹🇷

🇹🇷❤️🇭🇷

Well the ottomans were trying to destroy Croatia for 400 years and killed and enslaved thousands of Croatians. Nothing to love there.

W

Thats like a chicken saying he loves KFC lol

Onlar da bizim atalarımızdı 🥺🇵🇰

Thank you for your comtribution and and take care of muslim worlds for 700 years

Thanks for serving muslims from Arab to India to central Asia to Africa for 500 years. Now we all became weak cowards because of Liberalism and west worshipping 😢.... inshallah on day we will must rise !! And then imam Mahdi (a.s) will arrive to lead us🤫😎

@@NAZionist666 Insha Allah brother ❤️🇵🇰❤️🇹🇷

​@@ishratbinteshams2445🤍🤍

Actually, fatih (fetih) means conqueror, so it makes more sense to say Mehmet the conqueror.

Where did you studied about him? Any books

@@KamilTanweerKhan book name : the grand turk by john freely

@@talhashaikh3733 jazzakallah

nice name bro

Banned 🚫 secularism

Love Malaysia from Turkey 🇲🇾🇹🇷💖

​@@Rn_Qwxlove your Turkish Ottoman legacy from Algeria 🇩🇿🇹🇷🤍

​@@user-mm8ei9nx4o❤

So were the arabs back in 700s

@@FS-me8mj indeed

Every nation was at that place sometime when right decisions were taken at right time

Khalid bin walid entered the chat 😂❤

​@@thatsawesome5498Both great but khalid just built more different with the roman and sassanid

Constantinople was not renamed into istanbul until the formation of the Turkish state after ww1. The Ottomans called it Constantinople throughout their whole history.

No, it wasn't "Liberation". Was it a fairly peaceful conquest for the time? yeah. But, you need to understand what "Liberation" means, lol.

@@S.P.Q.Rrespublicas war is war. but did he KILLED anyone like the crusaders did not just once in Jerusalem but also in Al Andalus Spain. In the name of Jesus. And woe to you when Isa ibn Maryam 2nd coming for he will shot you down and claim he NEVER claims Divinity. And he will be a witness to himself in front of ALLAH saying he never proclaims divinity, againts who, against you Christians. you never embraced the gospel of Jesus, you embraced the gospel of Saul. Jesus never utter the word Christians.

@@relaxationwithmaru8859 I said it was a pretty peaceful conquest.... But peaceful conquest doesn't mean "Liberation".

@@S.P.Q.Rrespublicas yes there are fighting IN the war but when he enter , he did not butcher civilians like the crusaders.. what do you expect them to kiss cheeks in a war.. its a liberation because after the war even the jews and the Christians lives peacefully unlike when the previous empire they were oppressed.. they were happy living under muslim govern even in Andalus spain , even in Jerusalem. yes my friend every muslim army were loved when they liberated Syam/Syria from rome, jerusalem, egypt, the Coptic Christians loved and even helped muslim to liberate them from the TYRANNICAL BYZANTINES AND PERSIA.. This is Facts

@@relaxationwithmaru8859 i am not arguing with you on what the Ottomans did. It was very peaceful, ESPECIALLY compared to crusaders. BUT “Liberation” is NOT peaceful conquest. The DEFINITION of Liberation is to set someone free. IE, in 537, Belisarius liberated Roma from the Ostrogoths. THAT is liberation. I have huge respect for the ottomans and Islam. But “liberation” is not “peaceful conquest”

Yet they doubt his prophethood, even when everything he has foretold has come to be. SubhanaAllah

الله اكبر

It could also be this Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: The Last Hour would not come until the Romans would land at al-A'maq or in Dabiq. An army consisting of the best (soldiers) of the people of the earth at that time will come from Medina (to counteract them). When they will arrange themselves in ranks, the Romans would say: Do not stand between us and those (Muslims) who took prisoners from amongst us. Let us fight with them; and the Muslims would say: Nay, by Allah, we would never get aside from you and from our brethren that you may fight them. They will then fight and a third (part) of the army would run away, whom Allah will never forgive. A third (part of the army) which would be constituted of excellent martyrs in Allah's eye, would be killed and the third who would never be put to trial would win and they would be conquerors of Constantinople. And as they would be busy in distributing the spoils of war (amongst themselves) after hanging their swords by the olive trees, the Satan would cry: The Dajjal has taken your place among your family. They would then come out, but it would be of no avail. And when they would come to Syria, he would come out while they would be still preparing themselves for battle drawing up the ranks. Certainly, the time of prayer shall come and then Jesus (peace be upon him) son of Mary would descend and would lead them. When the enemy of Allah would see him, it would (disappear) just as the salt dissolves itself in water and if he (Jesus) were not to confront them at all, even then it would dissolve completely, but Allah would kill them by his hand and he would show them their blood on his lance (the lance of Jesus Christ). -Sahih Muslim 2897

Mohammad**

​Both are right (I am a native ​@@GhGh-sj4wb

Did he marry a 6 year old as well?

How come? Mehmed came years after muhammad saw

@@87minutesago1secondago8he has a hadith about the conqueror of the constantinople, which is mehmet the conqueror❤

The great ottoman empire🗿💯💯

🗿

*Ottoman Khilafa

🇹🇷

​@@Ya39oub_G Ottoman Empire*

And before all that he had such a unique personality and such a faithful heart, may Allah forgive his sins

You dare, you indespicable animal, you dare say the greatest city in the world, the greatest city ever known to man, Rome, your state, he, a barbarian, a infidel, a nomad, the one and true ending, the real Roman Empire, and didn't even follow Roman traditions, or even Greek traditions, they made that land into a Muslim, even more than that, a Turkish land, and you guys had the audacity to call him Caesar of Rome, but he didn't even conquer Rome, yes, I know he conquered Constantinople, but what was Constantinople worth at that time? Nothing, absolute garbage, it had been sacked in the 4th Crusade, it was a shadow of its former self, the Roman Empire was a very big shadow of its former self, and your barbarian sultan, he didn't even conquer Rome, the real prize, he couldn't conquer it, he died, that *BITCH* died. 🤣🤣🤣

The land is Constantinople win cold turkey is the foll like the Arabic pinnacle turn to Saudi mi Allah grunt us another khlipha

​@@wiliamAlltime What?

I am not sure he is the best Turkic ever but i am sure that he is one of the best Turkic Leaders.

@@sirius1460 NOPE, HE IS THE GREATEST TÜRK EVER. 🇹🇷

@@Alexander753. Maybe, because there is more Turkish leaders like him.

Mohammad*

@@GhGh-sj4wb I wrote in my own language bro

@@sekillisukullukanal6314 i know you Turkish bro but i mean Mohammad the correct name of our HZ Mohammad prophet SAW thats what i mean it

His path is of struggle and Islamic Shariah

vlad is a murder

Mohammad*

​@@GhGh-sj4wbprobhat Mohammad (PBUH) is the kindest and mercy ful leader of all time ❤

TURKS*

@@xooos00 The Prophet Mohammad said that there is a Muslim prince who will invade Constantinople. (What a prince and what a blessing in that army)What is clearly meant in this hadith is that he is mehmet the Conquer and his army and prophet call him a Muslim and you said no his not he is turk🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️ no one talk about his race man

Ultimate BRAINROT 💀

Alhamdullilah

No turk ❤️🇹🇷

@@Granzeboma if Mehmet Fatih saw today's Turkey launching a holy war against you, he is acting in the name of Islam and Allah

​​@@Granzebomabut according to muhammad el Fatih , he was a muslim caliphate and done the conquest because he and his followers believed in martyrdom for the sake of Allah and his prophet Muhammad (his name is the living proof ) and religion of islam, wether you like it or not Ottomans were the third Islamic caliphate which had continued the wars between islamic world against christendom for the centuries to come

​@@Granzebomathats the reason we cant have a caliphate in todays age. Nationality is one of the muslims biggest enemy

not emporer but a conqueror or opener and a great caliph of the third islamic caliphate

And great sultan

@@Cudeks Agreed ❤️

​@@Ya39oub_GLoL 😂😂 oThe Ottomans seized the caliphate in 1517. Mehmed was already dead. Arabs own happinies. He is Turkic rulers not khalifat.

​@@YksnakavtlamacaMehmet never called himself an Turkic despite being one. His name was Muhammad, Mehmet is what Europeans called him

Subhanallah

He was planning on it but he died before he was able to.

He got poisoned by italians

France and the Spanish kingdoms would've kicked him out of Italy fairly easily. He couldn't even take Belgrade

Mohammed*

@@GhGh-sj4wb Are you Shia?

​@@GhGh-sj4wb ?

this is a weak hadith

😂😂 shias are muslims we belive in god and the prophet and his family we dont worship omar and abu bakr and yazid​@@konjahoi_24

And he was Māturīdī in Aqeeda 🗿

the hadith is about end times, the man mentioned this hadith is Imam mehdi @@zulfiii01

It could also be this Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: The Last Hour would not come until the Romans would land at al-A'maq or in Dabiq. An army consisting of the best (soldiers) of the people of the earth at that time will come from Medina (to counteract them). When they will arrange themselves in ranks, the Romans would say: Do not stand between us and those (Muslims) who took prisoners from amongst us. Let us fight with them; and the Muslims would say: Nay, by Allah, we would never get aside from you and from our brethren that you may fight them. They will then fight and a third (part) of the army would run away, whom Allah will never forgive. A third (part of the army) which would be constituted of excellent martyrs in Allah's eye, would be killed and the third who would never be put to trial would win and they would be conquerors of Constantinople. And as they would be busy in distributing the spoils of war (amongst themselves) after hanging their swords by the olive trees, the Satan would cry: The Dajjal has taken your place among your family. They would then come out, but it would be of no avail. And when they would come to Syria, he would come out while they would be still preparing themselves for battle drawing up the ranks. Certainly, the time of prayer shall come and then Jesus (peace be upon him) son of Mary would descend and would lead them. When the enemy of Allah would see him, it would (disappear) just as the salt dissolves itself in water and if he (Jesus) were not to confront them at all, even then it would dissolve completely, but Allah would kill them by his hand and he would show them their blood on his lance (the lance of Jesus Christ). -Sahih Muslim 2897

@@sweetieali245How peaceful.

cause we didnt practice Islam

No impassable we don’t the Gaza lions said noo

To be stronger we have to unite and fix ourselves first before facing an enemy And I will start by myself May Allah guide every lost Muslim

​@@Belomoh6amin

Israel is just doing to Gaza what he did to Constantinople

Seljuk emperors could have conquered the Istambul way earlier if not for Cuman/Kipchak Khans intervening in Seljuk-Byzantium affair 300 years earlier the actual Ottoman siege of Istambul.

Hardly. The latins conquered Constantinople during its peak in 1204. Mehmed conquered a small city state and his achievements were the result of the great power his ancestors gave him. His father defeated the crusade of Varna which is why he didn't need to worry about a crusade. Despite having the ephetet the conqueror he never actually made a strong kingdom submit to him. The Romans were a city state, the Serbians long fractured, the Bosnians weak, and the Greeks long sense shattered in the 4th crusade. He completely failed to take Belgrade, and was constantly outdone by Stephen the great.

Those walls would have been untouched if it weren't for the basilica cannon. Constantine XI couldn't afford it, so it fell into Mehmed's hands.

What do you mean?

@@adammakhlouk5770 ty I spelt it wrong

Alexander's men disrespected him on several occasions Sultan's men will never

If you know even just a little bit of history, then you wouldn't have said that. Alexander the greats military tactics are still studied TIL THIS DAY. He is also one of the most influential people who EVER LIVED, along with Julius Ceasar, Napoleon, Aristoteles, Platon, Konfucius and even Jesus and the prophet Muhammed. Mehmet is certainly in the top 25-30, which still is VERY GOOD. DON'T let your emotions or your bias decide who is greater or not. Also Alexander conquered alot more land than Mehmet, he won more battles and he never lost like Mehmet. Yet again, Mehmet II is still a legend and one of my favourite military commanders.❤

Alexander took over almost All of west Asia and took Many cities. This guy took one.....

@@billrerikson6378have you ever heard named Umar in khattab and Khalid his general.

He put an end to 2 empires and 7 kingdoms. You should Search about his campaigns ​@@jakedominie3654

yeah

suuuuuuuure, there's probably no bias there.

​@@Ibidesgsindlimagine having no job, replying everyone in comment section 🤡

@@averagebangladeshiislamenj7399 I just don't have work on weekends.

@@averagebangladeshiislamenj7399 also, how did you come to the conclusion that I have no job? Are you talking from your own experience? Also, I'd prefer to simply debate. If you are too dumb to do that then leave.

and who told you that Mehmet was a turk?

@@Zafar.Khan.Pashtun go learn how to wash your hands first before talking maybe I can take your words seriously. Lower culture

​@@Zafar.Khan.Pashtun are u smoking weed? He was an ottoman turkish muslim u idiot

@@Zafar.Khan.Pashtunthe ottomans was turkic

@@Zafar.Khan.Pashtunevery ottoman sultan was turkic

exactly brother.

*prophecy

Dream? Watch your words . And That hadith, prophecy about conquest of Constantinople is not authentic.

​@@Brokenhearted894pedomad said don't fight the tulkis and manguls the hammer hit flat face 800 later the tulks are the one conquered constania what a joke of propecy 😂

​@@leokaboom7747Calipahtes dominated Europe 🗿 Don't forget that

@@WanJax8 what ? Stop drinking camle uline abdol 😂

He not prince He is Sultan

FR, They now becoming Gays , Shame !

maturity is when you realise Ataturk was a experiment of the Western countries to make Turkey a non-Islamic country by pushing secularism and unfortunately, They succeeded

No Ataturk and Sultan Mehmet defended the same idea . Ataturk himself said one of the his idol is Sultan Mehmet . Ataturk and Sultan Mehmet are diffirent from other Ottoman Sultans . You should learn history

@@denizc889 Ataturk was an anti Muslim simple as that

​@@denizc889 😂that's why ataturk abolished the state?

That's nonsense