Learn more in our free online course, “Contract Law: From Trust to Promise to Contract”: harvardx.link/ua5i8

I love this guys voice

May Prof. Charles Fried, and all the faithful departed, rest in peace.

Serious question: Is this the kind of stuff they teach at Harvard?

Thanks for it

FASCINATING!!!!!!!

I love it

That's a lot of money

Seems a bit steep for a desk...

A contract should be Something formally Binding (Something Like through pattern use or firm handshaking so that the PROMISE is seriously taken) say the offer ist accepted as both Parties agreed on that Type of specific Exchange in Common Sense say both Parties understand what they buy Into and agreed on the specific price for that Type of PROMISE in Common otherwise IT IS not a bargain or legally Binding promise and IT would rather be considered AS a favour instead. ITS all about understanding the very Nature of the MUTUAL PROMISE EXCHANGE on your Part. If you dont know what you are buying into at all so IT IS nonsense. IT must be Something specific, in Common and also formally Binding between the Parties in Order for Them to enter into a legally Binding contract. For example, no contract is created If you Just View a porno Site on the Internet with unknown characters in play and have No understanding of what you are into and havent paid for It. ITS rather a favour or No bargain at all.

Are marriages contracts?