One of the guests made a good example of what the entire debate was about. Climate change is newspeak, whether or not you believe in it or not and beliefs are irrelevant in a scientific context. Obviously the climate changes: ever second, hour, day, year, decade and millenia. No one would oppose such a statement, which gives it political power. Whether from human incentives or from its own evolution the word is undeniable in itself and broad enough to contain any political motive. Just like terror. No one wants terror and since it is an emotion it can be found anywhere (in middle eastern caves for instance) and fought anywhere by anyone for its existence alone. And anyone who questions this can easily fit under its category as a terrorist or idiot.

Is it just me or it gets harder and harder to understand Patrick's english accent?