Even though you are 5'6 back in you're day you were taller then average and the reason why we think that is because British propaganda,

vive la France ! vive l'empereur !

Classic bonaparte...

Atticus Badicus no, it was a measurement mix up not propaganda please do research

I swear the average person knows more about his height than his military strategic genius Big F

Archives of Fantasy I know but some others not that high

Michael Christidis yeah fair enough plus some statistics are very wrong. Subutai should be much higher he really shouldn’t be outside anyone’s top five. this video has some big flaws. Some questionable statistics and ranking on just win counts, not more needed context.

Well yes. Alexander Suvorov must be higher. He didn't lost any fight.

Дмитрий Майборода true but he couldn’t secure an allied win in the second coalition against the French Republic

Nosey all the way then. Beats Bonie at Waterloo. The Duke was a badass.

No funny but plain interesting particularly good to tell people who always claim that the French are military losers and overall cowards

That's what happens when you look for talent rather than loyalty, and hell, they we're both, Napoleonic Wars was a rollercoaster of emotions

That's why I'm proud to be French 🇨🇵

​@@scandalou6508You shouldn't be proud of war and killing people bro

@@furkanozdemir6754 Wtf ?

I just came from Oversimplified's video and I confirm this.

Yes people are underrating them and comparing them to the modern world. In the ancient world Hannibal was just a super genius general

Hanibal should be in top 5

@@muwsa1 After Alexander

Let’s compare history the 2 biggest nightmare of Rome in all history 2 very big ruler in history of war titans of war King Shapur I The Emperor Hunter vs Hannibal Barca both all time best generals in history let’s compare the 3 best victory of King Shapur I The Emperor Hunter vs Rome vs the 3 best victory of Hannibal vs Rome just 3 battle vs 3 battle and only against Rome King Shapur victory vs Kushan Empire , Parthian Empire and others don’t count and by the way almost 100 % of Hannibal victory were vs Rome any way so let’s compare the Battle of Barbalissos , Battle of Edessa and Battle of Misiche of King Shapur vs the Battle of the Trebia , Battle of Lake Trasimene and Battle of Cannae of Hannibal Barca more than 150,000 Roman warriors were killed by King Shapur I in those 3 battle he captured one Roman king alive and killed another one he also captured Roman generals like Successianus force the new Roman emperor Philip the Arab (r. 244-249) to sign a favorable peace treaty that was regarded by the Romans as "a most shameful treaty more than 100,000 Roman warriors were killed by Hannibal in those 3 battle Hannibal never captured no king or generals alive but he killed some Roman generals like Lucius Aemilius Paullus so which 3 battle were better without question King Shapur victory were better he killed more Romans but he also killed or captured more Roman kings and generals compare to Hannibal and also the greatest psychological blow in history of Rome was when King Shapur capture of Emperor Valerian alive King Shapur is Rome worst nightmare not Hannibal the winner is King Shapur I of Sassanian Empire

Aha , from Oversimplified I guess .

@@sknajibulhaque3595 aha yes

Happy Bicentenary my Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte ! Best Conquerer of Europe and Best General in History with 56 battles won. (Rumors say it's 70) 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜🦅⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜🦅⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜🦅⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜🦅⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜🦅⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 Battle of Austerlitz 1805 was his Greatest Victory

I get very happy whenever I see another Oversimplified fan online!

What comes after Emperor

😂

Lol

Ironic. I am studying Rome in school xD

23 STAB WOUNDS *slaps file on table*

Sad lol

why did he die?

Another honorable mention: Trajan

Baldwin IV was not a general, though he did take part in a few battles. It's a great movie quote, but Baldwin wasn't really a general.

@@fernhausluv44 yea ik I just the qoute so good (and sound like what a general would say) so I mentined it.

That is not the face of the Prophet Muhammad, this channel contains misleading and harassment!

fangeltim ,he found wrong data, for example: Suvorov participated in more than 60 battles and did not lose once. I think that the author also missed many others good commanders.

Lmao, General Vo Nguyen Giap had deafeated France army and America army but i couldn't see him in the video? :)

not really cause there would be a lot of generals left out

@@user-rz8mw7mm7c Suvorov won 93 battles and lose zero. So much lie in this video

Yes this video is stupid. Hum about the General Nguyen giap, I don't know for the Americans but didn't the French won the very most of the battles and accept Indochina independence because of the French people opinion and the international pressure ?

Big facts. Greatest strategist ever.

That's why he lost 7 battles...

Woah,its a stumpy little manlet

"What did you say you little prick?" Napoleon

Haha oversimplified

lol oversimplified

man of culture i see

Yes and some of his ennemies as well.. Crazy times.

What a war he waged!

Yes sir

Same

It's funny to see that the n°2 is the one that have actually beat Napoleon who is n°1 haha And they are both born the same year coincidences

Lee sun shin 27/27

Alexander the Great never lost a battle and fought alongside his men. Sometimes leading the charge. And sustained many wounds from battle. Whilst also conquering virtually all of the known world and battling many new foes he had never faced before and being able to adapt almost instantly to their tactics like he did in India with the war elephants. Definitely the winner in terms of a true warrior commander. And is definitely up there in terms of best general as well. Let’s not forget he was tutored by one of the greatest minds of antiquity, Aristotle. In terms of shear perfection and overwhelming amounts of success, Napoleon is likely the best general.

​@@darthjoshua6663 There is no confirmation that Alexander the Great or Napoleon participated in the battles. They only led the army, while Khaled led the army and participated in the battles. Leave your emotions behind and tell the truth

@@user-db2qx8ki8c I didn’t say napoleon participated in his battles. And if their is anything we know about Alexander the Great, we know he participated in his battles. There are many many stories of him fighting side by side along his men. You’re just saying we can’t be sure because it was over 2000 years ago. Bro, that’s stupid. By that logic, we might as well say he didn’t even exist. Alexander the Great is better, deal with it. Not to mention he treated those he conquered far better than Khaled treated his vanquished opponents. War crimes galore

@@darthjoshua6663why you so stupid

Scipio africanus "THE AFRICAN"

​@@RicegumNeverBrokeAgain this is a scipion's dynasty

And Suvorov too. 61 win, 0 foll.

Im mad Nadir shah is not here

Wow yet no huge film on him Though Napoleon and Alexander the Great just seem more iconic ​@@user-yz9ko1yj2e

The Russian Generals won one more battle than given credit for: Surviving Stalin's army purges of the 1930s.

The best Army is Russian Winter

What about november and march?

the real video name is 100 Greatest Generals in europa

@@kavehshirazi105 Rússia has a great territory in Europe, and it's in Europe that Moscow is located

Imagine the largest, most experienced and professional great army the world has ever seen, which conquered almost all of Europe and which remained forever ingloriously forgotten in the frozen lands of Russia. Such a tragic fate for such strong soldiers. Those recruits with whom he fought against Wellington were not the true Napoleonic army.

@@swe1733 thanks thanks bro 🥲

@@swe1733 I mean neither were they i literally recruited them for the conquest of Russia

I’m pretty sure Sun Tzu said that first

@@napoleonbonaparte1729 OMG ITS HIM OMG CAN I GET A PHOTO?????

@@Pardisc13895 You are ignorant and hateful. You do not know history. You speak without knowledge. You must provide evidence. How can an army consisting of 200,000 Romans get tired of fighting 20,000?!!! Use your idle mind, you are just a racist who hates anything related to Islam... You are just nothing talking about people who have been immortalized in history.

​@@Pardisc13895You are ignorant and hateful. You do not know history. You speak without knowledge. You must provide evidence. How can an army consisting of 200,000 Romans get tired of fighting 20,000?!!! Use your idle mind, you are just a racist who hates anything related to Islam... You are just nothing talking about people who have been immortalized in history.

​@@Pardisc13895You are ignorant and hateful. You do not know history. You speak without knowledge. You must provide evidence. How can an army consisting of 200,000 Romans get tired of fighting 20,000?!!! Use your idle mind, you are just a racist who hates anything related to Islam... You are just nothing talking about people who have been immortalized in history.

⁠@@Pardisc13895what? This is war you need to exploit enemy weakness, Khalid was genius as he always been in disadvantage and used his strategic planning to win battles.btw coward won’t be involved in war that deemed to lose

@@Pardisc13895 I agree, god (Allah) set the ground for khalid bin walid to conquer them, Indeed he is the most powerful and capable of doing anything.

Wow amazing

As a French interested in history, I'm always amazed by the Netherlands. Province of a kingdom then another, then another... Then became a true master of the seas and became even richer, small but powerfull army, big navy with colonies and the "VOC", a true Empire. I think we don't give enough attention in teaching and learning history in my country to Netherlands like we do with Spain, England, Portugal, Italy and Germany.

​@@widadboy벨기에 네덜란드는 한국가 통일

​@@user-fd8eh5sl1tWTH

​@@widadboySweden , Japan , Russia, Australia matters too For good education and sports

@@klif4755 Nazi Germany left the chat. French, British, Soviet, American zones joined the chat.

@@klif4755 Zionists left the chat Peace and brotherhood joined the chat

Cezzar Ahmet Pasha joined cheat!

🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷tu connais mon frère

This only proves that the best way to have the most victorious generals is internal revolution (hundreds of small battles).

general make the strategic for the soldier to win

But this is not the case with Khalid ibn Al Walid.. In almost all of his battles he first fought the best fighter of the enemies in a 1v1 and always won..

Büyük İskender ,Hanibal, Ervin rommel Halid bin Velid Alexander suvarov gibiler öyle değiller ama

Say that to Alexander the great or Khalid ibn Walid

@@befa5322 lmao no

651

10k in Hearts of Iron 4

@@aupra9010 USA is OP now, cause of the oil mechanic...

@@zethicc7557 didn't play the US since 1.6

That is a game you can think better in there

General kenobi

YOU ARE A BOLD ONE

im better than napey lol

Also Robert E. Lee was there from american civil war oversimplified😅

Napoleon has 20 assassination attempted

It the battle between the 3 top military commander that time, blucher, Wellington, Napoleon The battle that changed the history forever

​@@BekhtiRabehWhy does everyone give Blucher all the credit? Wellington created the plan for the victory.

@@thisguy976 If blucher didn't flank napoleon succesfully, Wellington would lost the battle

@@thisguy976If Blucher wasn’t there Napoleon would’ve won without any problem

​@BekhtiRabeh blucher top 3 commander of that era what are you smoking. Top 20 and i am being generous lmao

맞습니다

Indeed the timeline, size of army matters

That doesn’t change Napoléons status

​@tables8709 I'll put Alexander, Khalid and Caesar as better commander then Napoleon

@@darthvader4338 nice joke. Im from Russia and Napoleon is really the greatest military commander in history

You really must be uncomfortable if your standing on your head.

Lool your drunk

@@coolthefool1 well i was just... commenting i guess 😶

throwing some ham Lool it's calm

@林 that's...racist?

My boy alexander the great taking the w

well khalid ibn waleed 0 losses i mean he is undefeated Conqueror

If that was the case Napoleon would still be #1 due to the sheer number of wins.

Khalid .. 28 .. ratio

#4 is the only one undefeated in the top 20

I believe it’s called Victory by two steps from hell

unknowingly true right there!

Wise

I think Sun Tzu said that

@@kanestalin7246 seemingly they both said it lol

Why ?

Give me an army of Turks and I'll take the world hostage. 🇹🇷 ~Napoléon Bonaparte

Genghis Khan begs to differ :P still the man who conquered the biggest empire in all of history (yeah yeah the British Empire was bigger but not conquered by one man!)

@@DiscusvissenRocken he wasn’t one man he had a huge army do it

In the shade of olive trees, they said Italy could never be conquered.

@@australium7374 same can be said for Napoleon.

He deserves a film , but it's impossible as nobody that strong exists today

ico what general said that?

@@danielcunningham648 The french general Marie-Pierre Koenig during the battle of Bir Hakeim in 1942.

@@danielcunningham648 Zivojin Misic

@valoxy it was actually Colonel Chesty Puller (USMC)

And you realized you are fucked in every possible holes!

oof

By the conspirators 7 of them including his trusted Brutus stabbed him :(

Caesar protecc Caesar atacc But most importantly... Caesar got stabbed in the bacc

That's fate. Obviously fate.

Bro Khalid ibn Walid didn't lost any single war in his life tym

hello there

@@oghuzEarendil GENERAL KENOBI!!!

FRISHR *TOP COMMENT GOD*

Lord of the Patates general kenobi

How many battles won though?

Won every battle. Too bad the Military genius general Kenobi killed him in the battle of Utapau.

@@rookield8077 in a very uncivilized way

Obi-Wan : Hello There

what about general kenobi?

I hope the Gengus Kan dies cause 喝 killed 65 million people

His defeat in Russia was 600.000 vs. 500.000 and he lost 550.000 of them - so he can't be best! At Waterloo it was 78000 French against 72.000 Prussians and British - again, not good for him! For me he is a good top-ten-general - in the last years he lost all of his instincts!

@@miaundnemo Well Russia actually lost but then retreated then burned down Moscow which is what defeated napoleon. They didn't have a full fair 1v1 fight because Russia knew they would've lost.

@@JosephLopez-jq7fk Of course, you're right, but you also have to admit that it's a bit ridiculous that a campaign that marked the end of his career and cost him 500,000 men is listed here with two victorious battles! And of course the greatest general of all time would have had to react to the Russian strategies. In Moscow he simply waited too long and then didn't even have the horses' hooves shod "sharply"! Later, in Leipzig, horses were what he missed most!

@@miaundnemo It is very ridiculous how two victories cost him 500,000 men but honestly Russia definitely deserved to win considering that they strategically bested one of the greatest generals in history. It seems Napoleon also underestimated them seeing how many mistakes he made trying to invade Russia. Napoleon definitely had the stronger army but at that moment Russian generals had better strategy.

​@@JosephLopez-jq7fkif he attacks we RUN away!

Michel ney

@@TiestoCalvinHarris Louis Gabriel Suchet , Jean de Dieu Soult , Jean Lannes , Saint Cyr

@@hermann5485Jean Lannes neden listede yok acaba?

Napoleon, although of low Corsican nobility, was a soldier of the French Revolution who made a career in the French Republican Army who fought against the French royalists during a civil war in France, French royalists being supported by foreign monarchies hostile to the French revolution. Thus, he made himself noticed for the first time by contributing by his action to take back the port of Toulon that the French royalists had opened to the English fleet. Napoleon could thus be compared to the English Cromwell who led the armies of the parliament defeated the royal armies of the Stuart dynasty.But once he came to power, Napoleon while seeking to preserve the French revolutionary achievements as the principle of"equality among citizens, promulgated a broad amnesty for exiled aristocrats of France and contributed to the religious peace France between republicans and Catholics by signing in 1802 a concordat with the pope. If it is criticized in France for its multiple wars and the resulting conscription, it has always been considered as a peacemaker inside the country so much that a very large number of its multiple administrative reforms, Schools, legal as the Civil Code, survived in the following regimes some of which were initially hostile to it as royalty restored until our present time. The best example of Napoleon’s spirit of national concord was on 22 June 1815 when he had been outvoted by the parliamentary chambers elected in the parliamentary elections of April 1815 where his political opponents were in the majority (because he had had the imprudence of not suspending or dissolving parliament before his departure for the military campaign) and while his brother Lucien and the minister Carnot asked him to arrest the parliamentarians and to establish the military dictatorship with the support of the arrest which was favorable to him in order to face the invasion of the territory,Napoleon preferred to abdicate to avoid a civil war between his numerous supporters and his royalist political opponents who supported the return of King Bourbon Louis XVIII.

​@@kingdarwin8953hes here

He looks fine ask Charles V

He is suffering

He looks like he just layed a giant turd.

He's just scared of General Sherman right next to him, because Sherman implemented the scorched-earth strategy in the American Civil War, and Scipio remembers Carthaginians doing the same thing when they invaded the Roman Empire.

4:07 That's nothing in comparison with Takeda Shingen

I feel sorry for Hannibal, he broke the legions of Rome and he could have actually won, which would have made history very different, but Carthage did not send enough support for him (they were not overstretched, Carthage did indeed have enough resources to overcome Rome at this point if they had actually committed to it). Hannibal's political rivals led by Hanno II repeatedly denied Hannibal's requests for reinforcements because Hanno thought Rome was unbeatable and wanted to instead focus Carthage's military on conquering territory in Africa and making peace with Rome, because Hanno had personal investments in Africa. Hanno was so convinced that fighting Rome was futile that he demoralized and delayed his own navy in the 1st Punic War and then left Hannibal's armies without backup in the 2nd Punic War. After ensuring that his own country lost both wars, Hanno then hoped to negotiate peace with Rome, but (big shocker) Rome took advantage of Carthage's weakness and took nearly everything, including all that precious African territory Hanno had claimed. Hannibal: Help me, we can win if you just help me! I only need enough for one more decisive strike before they recover! Hanno: No, we must sabotage our own armies and render ourselves defenseless. Only then will Rome leave us alone! Rome: *Destroys Carthage* Hanno: *Surprised Pikachu*

A lot of myth and few facts about Hannibal. E.g. it is unlikely he lost 65% of his army when crossing the Alpes. It is more likely the numbers from Spain were subtracted by the numbers he arrived in in Italy, ignoring that he left troops in Northern Spain (which was not under Carthaginian influence) and only crossed with his crack troops knowing the situation in Italy was unstable for Rome (with freshly conquered Gauls and Greeks being very, very unhappy and ready to rebel). Also the fact he did not receive much support is also something one must see in the wider strategic context. Rome controlled the seas and thus the inner lines of transport. In return Carthage had to split its attention between defending Spain and Africa given Rome's first reaction before Hannibal's move was to go straight for those targets with two consular armies. Both those regions were essential for Carthage to continue the war. They could not easily reinforce Hannibal and those regions needed armies, too. Just like the Romans were split on what strategy to adopt so were the Carthaginians. The idea that Hanno was a hand wringing fool is just based on the outcome, not based on the necessities as seen at the time. The war also dragged on for 17 years which is many times more any other Roman enemy held out so it is also false to think Carthage was a pushover that did not know how to mobilize armies. Most Hellenic kingdoms surrendered major territory inside one or two battles. So given Carthage gave Rome nearly 40 years worth of war all over the Eastern Mediterran we have the only other power that managed to keep up with Rome for nearly two generations worth of carnage. I find it particularly fascinating in how they apparently were able to rally a multitude of people to their banner continuously and train them to fight in a disciplined fashion.

@@tristanfaulkner6003 Well said.

Ok boomer

Hanibal ante Portas!!!!!!!!

Victory by two steps from hell

You mean battles

*Battles| but yeah it should be depends on the difficulties of that battles and how they lead their troops to victories and that's what i look for

I could take on a 500 kids with my 50 fully armoured men 100 times and would be crowned the fucking idiot who has the racord on winning battles

If you start a world war and actually win, well that'll be something new.

Absolutely bro

He not god war only he is father modern Law that we still use till now it called "Napolean CODEX"

Haiti defeated Napoleon 😂😂🇭🇹🇭🇹

That's what the Russian did and in Road to Leipzig

@You Fat dont cry pls, we arent kids

@You Fat are u crying more? Take it, for u🧻

You exaggerating the number, at Yarmouk. He only have 30000 against 150000 Byzantinians forces

What? Napoleon was never executed. What are you talking about?

What? He was never executed he exiled to st. Helena where he died of an illness or old age. yes it is true that Khalid won every single one of his 28 battles. But Napoleon won 56 he won, 2× than khalid but im not saying Khalids a bad general. Im just saying that your too overexaggerating Khalids feats just to say hes better. I admit both of them are absolute G.O.A.Ts and very cool nicknames (sword of Allah and Nightmare of Europe), but dont exaggerate the person your supporting

@@bananasaging1423 Also, everything about Napoleon is very well documented, while Khalid's records are much less clear.

@@VRichardsn yea thats tru but their still are the G.O.A.Ts

If fighting is sure to result in victory then you must fight! Sun Tzu said that!

@@user-bh7xc6lv7h And I'd say he knows a little more about fighting than you do pal because he invented it

@@user-bh7xc6lv7h and i think he knows a little more about fighting than you doo paaal Coz he invented it...and then he perfected it so that no living man can best him in the ring of honor

"When he approaches, we run, away" -Sun Tzu

@@oneofakindconner7224 *warcry* "to the left" MAGGOTS

Frank Castle yes

didnt realize that

That got to be hurts!!!

they probably did it on purpose

@@ilsey4733 I doubt it. Not all the planned assassins stabbed him so if the plan was carried out perfectly and all the assassins stabbed him, he would have had more than 23.

victory

Yes

Napoleon lost his pp lol

Napoleon was bisquits and tree lava over a hill on a plane and into the woods foraging for mountains under a river full of cats raining how powerful army.

@@yangfire7349 it was small anyways

Peoples have no idea how powerful Cyrus the Great and Darius the Great were in there time they control like 40 % of the world population in there time

Until he remembered he had artillery, and the guy he's talking about didn't. 😁

And he was beaten in his last battle by the second place Duke Wellington.

@@belisarius727 Yes. Napoleon's army was inexperienced, outnumbered and other factors I forgot, but yes he was beaten, there's no denying that. But you still have to remember it took... A don't remember the how many coalitions made by the English, but this time Napoléon lost.

He was being humble, if napoleon and fredrick Were in the same age napoleon will smash Frederick the great

Military battles won doesn’t mean how good of a genera you were. In Napoleon’s time, battles were more common and he had more enemies and war time. Fredrick the great only participated in the seven years war where he held out against Russia, Austria, and France for the entire first part of the war.

Well with basically all of Europeagainst Napoleon,he had more than one chance to extend his list of victories !

@Hornyshark for real? Ma cack big

@mr marq Christianism was already spread at that time... And we could say the same for other religions

@mr marq Man u sound stupid, christians has been around the world even before muslim. It was spread by the roman empire.

That's a shocker

As a muslim, I place Khalid ibn al walid first and place Alexander of Macedon 2nd, and then Napoleon, and then Baibars. These men changed the world we live in drastically by their wins in battles. Edit: for those of you who think I placed him first because he is a better General, no! I placed him first because he changed the world drastically through his conquests ultimately commanded by prophet Muhammad (upon him be peace) sure, Napoleon changed the world we live in so much, But Napoleon lived only 200 years ago while Khalid lived 1400 years ago, so in terms of hiatory he changed that more.

@@user-yk4ji True bro

@@user-yk4ji Nah. Napoleon literally destroyed 5 great powers of the world while france's government was still in shambles. Napoleon was so strong that the only way to defeat him was running away

@@user-yk4ji don’t be biased

It's not true. He said, "The eyes of cowards never sleep."

Lol

usa mc donals

jordan gilles ?

@@H_man.. Really have internet in Mongolia?

@@planenjoyer ho DAMN lmao 😂😂

Heard about polish victories?

Sorry but nobody likes the french

@@propolacy2137 yes, about 20 of them in this vid (sorry actually 29 piłsudski exists)

@@bartekmostek4850 right.

@m n Turkish on blood , Dutch on paper but i hate both countries! soon in the future i will be an American citizen 🤡 i love America

So thats what rush B stands for, rush Blitzkrieg

@@trollardo9720 in Caesar's case, rush Britain

You clearly have no clue what blitzkrieg means.

@@MaFd0n Blitzkrieg=Ligthing War lol

interesting, you have sent me on a quest..

H .H Napoleon may have won more battles but it was the Duke who won in the end

Bardo Napoleon is the undisputed greatest artillery commander of all time but the French’s tactics of marching columns into British lines was madness

@@georgebardsley7129 It's a fallacious reasoning. Napoleon 1. didn't lose because of Wellington alone far from it, which btw wasn't there during the most decisive and the biggest battles of the conflicts (Borodino, Leipzig...) 2. changed military warfare forever, and had most of his military innovations copied by his ennemies, over time. Napoleon was just in a very difficult, unfavorable situation (a bit like Hannibal), though he could still have "won" (before Leipzig though, after that it was too late and futile) but well, it's easy to say that now.

The great people are born together in order to balance eachother

@Rays How was he a coward he took the fight to France in Spain against some of Napoleons most distinguished marshalls? A coward would've stayed in Britain doing nothing, Wellington was not a coward, also a coward would not put his life on the line like he did at waterloo being exposed to 500+ French cannon bombardments of which could've killed him. Wellington fought a long side his men like a warrior.

Obiwan Kenobi

Don't forget general griveous too

We ain’t gonna talk about general lando calrisen

Lmao

But what about General Organa?

+ поражение от России

@@mahmoudobaid9773 Actually there were many more Generals who never lost a battle

@@user-gs4kw6bn7t and the Byzantines probably had 15.000 to 150.000 troops. Not 300.000 It's probably propaganda or the numbers just aren't clear

@@faisalnehal372 give me a name of a commander who never lost a battle?! you said probably the number was 150000 so your never sure. where do you get your info from?!

@@mahmoudobaid9773 well, Alexander never lost a battle and I'm pretty sure there are others out there. Also you can do research on the real estimates of the Roman and Persian armies that Khaled fought. 300000 is simply unrealistic considering the context of the time period.

Yeah😮

I was wondering about that too

He's in another video, though batu Khan of Mongolia empire is there with fifteen battles

Me too

So , Duke of Wellington (A great one indeed) is higher that Khalid ? Really ? If we measure greatness , we should look at how simple , what difficulties they faced , and how it affected history !! Khalid in my unbiased opinion is the greatest , far greater than Napoleon. He was never defeated , the greatest user of calvaries ever , a great tactician , a strong warrior himself , and most importantly ; the one who shaped the current world map of the middle east To sum up , it is never easy to expand your effect 1400 years ahead Strange how people don't know about him , but media effect I think . Cheers

@@ahmedazeem1642 this video is about battles won my guy

@Celuta provided that the records are right , so we agree , friend. This is not about who is the greatest or the most genius , it is about who won more ✨ . We agree , like in tennis , Connors won the most but the 3 goats are still playing

Also some people should not be included like prophet Muhammad , because he was not a general , if we measure greatness in all aspects of human life including conquest , he is the greatest ever by very very far (unbiased)

@@ahmedazeem1642 ok the video was 3 years ago its not that deep

And Hercules envied Jhonny sins, and that man DID exist.

Alexander envied/looked up to Cyrus

​@@jordanplays-transitandgame1690no he didnt. He just respected him But it was no where near as having a barbarian as his idol. His idol was achilles

- Bertrand Russell

Barbarian? ​@@Thomas.Nikolaidis10

Manstein should be the best German general in WW2

True

@@rastellikk oh no...do your research

@@rastellikk is correct, Paulus created his own plan, Operation Donnerschlag or Thunderclap to meet up with Manstein relieving force. But Manstein either believing the Luftwaffe's claim to supply Stalingrad from the air or not understanding the situation told his Subordinate, Paulus, to stand his ground in the city.

@@rastellikk like you say...their progress to free them. This shows that he wasnt the cause of its destruction because the 6st army already was in trouble or encircled.

Oversimplified

Ah, I see you're a man of culture as well

@@idotso6057 Woah,its a stumpy little manlet

Marshall Barack Obama

@@jamesandersonmuega9137 HEY. IM ACTUALY AVERAGE HEIGHT FOR THE TIME. HUHUHU

Sorry, but he failed "the invade Russia test", so no, he was not.

@@user-uk5qe1xn8h against winter, no one can win

hayır değildir çok fazla propagandası yapıyordur benim sıralama büyük iskender hanibal barca jül ceaserdır

​@@cagatayerdenet3327Barca?

And then France surrenders in 1940

@@pucior4445 because of Pétain who was rulling France and who thought it would be a good idea

DudaThePlayer maybe cause english abandoned us

Aegon Targaryen pffft.

Aegon Targaryen English had a couple thousand men there.

He should be ranked #1 THE SWORD OF GOD

Assalamu'alaikum

Alternative name for Khalid: Murderer

@@ahmadhussein2366 he shouldnt've even been ranked. This video is about generals not thugs.

@@aliazarmehralparslan6067 alternative name for you:stupid

victory by two steps from hell

Spotify

In this list I’ve seen Ney, Davout, Murat, Massena, Soult, Moreau, Lannes, Suchet, Saint Cyr, Kleber and of course Napoleon at first

I knew he would be #1 and also that a bunch of his marshals would be in there too. The First French Empire really steamrolled every other nation for a while there.

@@praetoriandorn3154 he was great but had need defeated by Russian

Well but all he did was a war crime.

@@karim4life72 firstly the term war crime didn't exist back then, Geneva convention was held much later after the end of Napoleonic wars.... Secondly whatever he did wasn't unique, everyone used to do that, it was common for that time

great man

@@waruiseishin953 he was a man of culture and loyalty😌

Wow! Sir a movie should be made of his gallantry and loyalty to France..

@@conradmanove8749 yes it should be!

The bravest of the brave.

U should read some books on napoleon, you will discover all his genius and how he won with even half of enemy army !

Napoléon was so good that general enemy have to flee when they know that napoleon was leading army . They have orders to fight only against Marshall of napoleon !

cmon bro give him another way how to show how great generals were, this isn't that bad

@@el_gabron Still not as accurate

@@el_gabron overall effect on the war maybe? I mean you can win 10 more battles than the other side and still lose the war like Vietnam

the overall effect on war doesn't necessarily indicate commanders' abilities. It might be casualties inflicted due to war with consideration of world's population at battles timeframe but still, this is better than what you have suggested.

@@thegreatnest3308 a battle can simply be 3 soldiers against an armada lol, that doesn’t always measure ability. How about tactics and strategy.

@Putra NF ngomong ap sw

@Adecodoo yea sure but Zhukov won all his medal during the war fighting nazi, he earned them buy fighting not polishing shoes

Have you seen a North Korean General? They have more medals in their uniforms than Kardashians have shoes in their closets. Reality is often unrealistic.

Most of the Soviet medals are anniversary medals, 5-10-20-25 years of whatever. The ones that count are on the top. In case of Zhukov he received the highest award possible at the time, Hero of The Soviet Union 4 times (only one on the image). 3 (well deserved) for World War 2 and the fourth for political manoeuvring after Stalin's death.

Yea

Hey no cross teaming

Mostly against each others scrubby teammates.

quit feeding kills bro

Well, they only actually fought each other once. If that is your logic, might as well give Napoleon all of the victories of his Marshals as well.

Allah bless him biggest leader

SubhanAllah brother

Халид. № 1

Hi