Could 10 X B-1b Lancers Or Nukes Beat A Rogue Imperial Star Destroyer? (WarGames 61)

Could 10 X B-1b Lancers Or Nukes Beat A Rogue Imperial Star Destroyer? (WarGames 61) | DCS

Рет қаралды 444,598

Күн бұрын

0:00 Intro
0:38 Details
4:01 Take Off
10:52 Attack Run 1 (bones)
16:43 Attack Run 2 (bones)
22:52 Attack Run 3 (nukes)
SPONSORS
Winwing Store: wwsimstore.com/STORE
Sponsor Reviews: • Sponsor Reviews
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (KZfaq): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2 (KZfaq): / @grimreapers2
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
OTHER
CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#WarGames #GRWarGames #B1b #Lancer #Bone #Nuke #StarDestroyer #StarWars #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military

Пікірлер: 1 100

@christopherhanton6611 Жыл бұрын

LOL WELLL DONE FINALLY YOU DID SOMETHING WITH STAR WARS 🤣

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/abl2l6p52rLaaKc.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oZlgZrSf0bzTnmQ.html

@goawayihavecommentstomake1488 Жыл бұрын

“Turbolaser” is the capital ship weapon from Star Wars you are thinking of ;)

@druunderwood5602 Жыл бұрын

So you're to blame for the UXB JDAM in my back garden

@Defender78 7 ай бұрын

would love to see all thse B-1 bombers and F-35s and B-21s destroy the alien invaders from the movie Skyline (2010) also what if the B1 bombers could lunch cruise missiles like they did in ID4, and if the Tomcats fired Pheonix and sidewinders from BVR?

@mrhedgebull1658 Жыл бұрын

Finally, the serious tactical military simulations we needed.

@jvee4072 Жыл бұрын

thank you! i didnt wanna be that guy to say it.....

@mrhedgebull1658 Жыл бұрын

@@jvee4072 I always seem to be that guy!

@Jedi.Toby.M Жыл бұрын

This type of situation occupies too much of my "hypothetical situation" part of my brain than it should...and I'm sure I'm fine with that

@Wonderwhoopin Жыл бұрын

They are in a f1422351516

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

Tactical science is important for all.

@Maeyanie Жыл бұрын

The Empire: "Give us money or we will destroy London." GR: "Not on our watch. You can't destroy London if we destroy it first!"

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

lols

@jimmyphantom5572 Жыл бұрын

Lol

@youngthaiarfssoldier8732 Жыл бұрын

lol

@aaronmclaughlin3624 Жыл бұрын

ROFL

@LAV-III Жыл бұрын

Ironically that was the empire’s way of thinking with operation cinder “you can’t defeat the empire if we destroy it first rebel scum”

@ecbst6 Жыл бұрын

I think they call the big mounted guns 'turbolasers', in spite of the blaster standard.

@MarkoDash Жыл бұрын

Star War's main energy weapons, ignoring the more esoteric stuff, tend to have 3 different categories despite all 3 having the same functionality. despite the various names all of them seem to shoot small packets of tightly contained plasma. Blasters: Small arms-light autocannon range, from tiny derringer-like pistols to Ma Deuce equivalents like the E-web, some light vehicles mount blasters (AT-ST, etc) Laser Cannon: Main armament of ground vehicles and Starfighters, range from autocannon to tank cannon equivalents. tend to come in two flavors, light and heavy. the turrets on the Millennium Falcon and the guns of the TIE fighters are light laser cannons, the long guns on the end of the X-wing's wings and the main guns of the AT-ATs are heavy laser cannons. Turbolaser: main starship and heavy vehicle armament, range from heavy AAA equivalents to battleship main guns. are separated into light-medium-heavy-superheavy categories. The ISD is covered in hundreds of light and medium turbolasers, but the main armaments are the 64 heavy turbolasers in the eight octuple-mount turrets on the sides of the superstructure.

@Kevin-hb7yq Жыл бұрын

@@MarkoDash Yes, the phazers.

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

thx

@jasperkalen7571 Жыл бұрын

@@grimreapers The way I always had it in my head cannon from reading the “Legacy” era novels were that the “turbolasers” on the capital ships were analogous to a 76mm or 57mm modem turret. Mainly used for bombardment or attacking other ships, but not really meant for anti-star fighter defense (although if you got lucky, you could certainly take a star fighter down with one shot). But point defense were done with laser cannons, like the dual quad laser cannon turrets on the Millennium Falcon or on the Lancer-class cruisers. The laser cannons weren’t as powerful as the turbolasers, but were faster at tracking and more agile; more akin to 20mm point defense weapons from the WW2 era. And of course, none of them are lasers in the traditional sense; but more a charged plasma emission amplified by tibana gas.

@Jedisherm Жыл бұрын

@@jasperkalen7571 Correct, The TBLs had a hard time trying to follow the smaller starfighters which is why the Ties were needed for CAP/screen. But very little is mentioned about the quad laser sets for anti-starfigher role. IIRC, in the Xwing Series The Bacta War, they talk about the armament of an Imperial MKII and what would need to be stripped for Booster Terrik to have the ship privately. They mostly addressed the TBLs, Ions, and tractor beams.

@jyralnadreth4442 Жыл бұрын

Thinking about it...the Imperials will be intercepting comms talking about B-1s coming their way, the Imps are probably on the floor laughing thinking you are sending B1 Battle droids to kill them 😂

@captaincactus1414 Жыл бұрын

Heheh

@SoshoKozadokaGojiraChargedUp Жыл бұрын

And then they start to hear the booms erupting all over their ship

@colmanaburn Жыл бұрын

Roger Roger

@alicorn3924 Жыл бұрын

@@SoshoKozadokaGojiraChargedUp and then experience the PTSD under a WW1 artillery barrage, without dying of course

@SoshoKozadokaGojiraChargedUp Жыл бұрын

@@alicorn3924 yep

@randlebrowne2048 Жыл бұрын

Don't forget that, despite the name, Star Destroyers are actually carriers as well. Imagine trying to get through a screen of Ties, before even getting in range of the turbolasers!

@carrisasteveinnes1596 Жыл бұрын

And they have layered force fields or defence screens, and I read the turbo lasers have range up to 1600km. Plus they have forward velocity of up to 900 km/hour under antigravity atmosphere flight.

@LordRyn Жыл бұрын

@@carrisasteveinnes1596 That's overkill by modern standards, I'm sure even the rebels had their hands full

@CreeperDude-cm1wv Жыл бұрын

Imagine all the ace combat protags, plus maverick and monarch taking that on.

@Riken Жыл бұрын

And the layers of force fields being created by the shield generators

@b-chroniumproductions3177 Жыл бұрын

@@LordRyn early Rebellion had to fear small frigates let alone Star Destroyers, late-war Rebellion had some of their own comparable capital ships (the Mon Calamari cruisers)

@osuna3525 Жыл бұрын

I always liked how the B-1R they were considering years ago also spells B-ONE-R *_BONER_*

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

lols

@05councilmember Жыл бұрын

Lol

@KroMagnum4 Жыл бұрын

Was a crew chief on the B1B at McConnell AFB back in the 80's. I think AGM-69 SRAM's would have been better. Thanks for the memories.

@justfun287 Жыл бұрын

Nice

@Gunni1972 Жыл бұрын

You beat a Star destroyer? LOL

@KroMagnum4 Жыл бұрын

@@Gunni1972 Yup 1985 over the Mojave desert, but that's classified.😎

@hoghogwild Жыл бұрын

24 SRAMs internal on 3 rotary launchers. The BONE is awesome, B-52 payload at 2% the RCS with 600 knots capability at 200 feet. Didn't have its nuclear mission long.

@KroMagnum4 Жыл бұрын

@@hoghogwild Yup.

@rodrigonunez9451 Жыл бұрын

Imerial Star Destroyers vs B-1s, F-14 and argentinian MiG 21 with nukes over London? Man this is what i call Quality Content.

@alicorn3924 Жыл бұрын

when the Falklands war goes wrong

@alexander1485 Жыл бұрын

Imerial?

@ladsvideos Жыл бұрын

"Sir, for the first time ever the Rebels AREN'T evading our turbo lasers!"

@dankuchar6821 Жыл бұрын

This type of accurate scientific research is so important! Thank you for your service!

@Kevin-hb7yq Жыл бұрын

Vital information to be sure.

@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze Жыл бұрын

Good guys: “WE DID IT, WE SAVED THE CITY!” The city in question:

@cmotdibbler4454 Жыл бұрын

The east end of London now looks like a scene from fallout 4... which is a mild improvement.

@Patrician9000 Жыл бұрын

My good friends dad flew the B1 when we were kids, I didn't realize how cool that was until I got older. He once told me that dropping a bomb at that speed was like throwing a golf ball into a solo cup from a speeding car. RIP Sir.

@uhohmemebiggestboy212 Жыл бұрын

Your best bet for attacking a star destroyer that we're gonna say doesn't have any tie fighters and non operational shields since you weren't intercepted and you the bombs hit the surface of the star destroyer, is to attack from the back, no guns can see you, just don't be level with the engines as they will vaporise anything that gets close, but the star destroyer is perfectly designed for frontal assault and flanking, so you need to attack from behind it to not get shot down immediately

@justsomejackmarstonwithint7248 Жыл бұрын

I doubt the engines would vaporize immediately but they would certainly obliterate any chance of the fighters using missiles that are in any sense using heat

@edwardnigma2216 Жыл бұрын

The bridge tower has a few turrets on it for defending the rear of the ship, but admittedly far fewer than the rest of the ship. Attacking from the rear would pretty much be the ONLY option seeing as the ISD has a distinct targeting/firing range advantage.

@uhohmemebiggestboy212 Жыл бұрын

@@justsomejackmarstonwithint7248 in the games if you get close to engines in a star fighter or what not it will do a lot of damage true not literal vaporisation but I wouldn't bet that jets and bombers from earth would have any chance

@TheRandomshite123 Жыл бұрын

Even with TIE's there is still a chance, they suck in atmosphere and the basic model doesn't have standoff weapons, shields or point defence so sidewinders or CWIS could probably take them down

@Kelnx Жыл бұрын

@@TheRandomshite123 Well yeah, but no half-intelligent captain of a Star Destroyer, or any Sci-Fi battleship would even enter the atmosphere. Just stay in orbit, deliver your demands, and be untouchable. A single Star Destroyer could basically control the entire earth from space with just threats. You can't fight what you can't reach, and they can bombard infinitely from orbit.

@BlokeOnAMotorbike Жыл бұрын

4x F101-GE-102 engines on the Lancer. Total thrust in excess of 120,000lb with afterburner.

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

Wowser!

@Chironex_Fleckeri Жыл бұрын

They were used in COIN for this earthshaking effect. Flying low and fast, they can cause the ground to shake with the sheer noise of those engines with afterburner on. Was a good way to get insurgents to disengage and flee, revealing their hiding locations to circling UAVS .

@DavidBrown-yd9le Жыл бұрын

I’m not sure what engines are on the bone but one night I was driving a truck across i94 and two of these took off over me. I can’t put into words how LOUD they are

@jasonbiggums Жыл бұрын

Was visiting my family at one of the airbases the B1s fly out of. From more than a mile away from the flight line it shook the windows of the building I was in and the lightposts outside. It's a crazy plane, I hope to be able to fly one of them when I join the air force

@razorfett147 Жыл бұрын

120,000 lbs of thrust moves a SH1T-ton of air 😳😆

@Rikard_Nilsson 9 ай бұрын

Back in 2008 I was sitting in the drivers seat of an M113 in a vehicle column in Helmand province Afghanistan. We had been sitting there waiting for the better part of a day when EW says taliban has eyes on us and our TACP calls in a show of force with a B-1 on afterburners over our column, only problem is they didn't seem to care about any minimum altitude flight restrictions because as they passed overhead It felt like if I stood up and stretched I could have touched their underside, it was loud as hell.

@TzeentchLord412 Жыл бұрын

An ISD carries turbolasers. Blasters in Star Wars are infantry weapons.

@jvee4072 Жыл бұрын

they are hangin out the port holes man....

@5Andysalive Жыл бұрын

What is a "turbolaser"? Does the light of the laser move faster than light then? Given that almost all fights in Star Wars (and Star Trek) happen at ludicrously tiny distances, that doesn't even seem necessary.

@jyralnadreth4442 Жыл бұрын

@@5Andysalive Turbolasers and Laser cannons as GAS Plasma Laser weapons....the Laser is a transmission beam that Plasma basically sticks too (Its a real scientific possibility) and rides the beam to the end. The Laser is a component rather than the whole weapon just like Star Treks phasers have lasers involved. Blasters are different in that they are pretty much just plasma weapons with very short range just like Star Trek Enterprise started with in 2151

@mrcontroversy222 Жыл бұрын

@@jyralnadreth4442 you are a FUCKING nerd. AND I LOVE IT

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

thx

@Psychobolic77 Жыл бұрын

I think your -bombers- bones got shot down by the destroyer as they passed overhead on your second run. They must have just got into range of the guns after they dropped their bombs. Looking on the bright side, the Thames now has a lovely, only slightly radioactive, pond connected to it by a blast crater. Just call it landscaping.

@5Andysalive Жыл бұрын

interesting philosophical question: If they demand less ransom than a bomb/missile would cost (or London houses) to shoot them, would we try or just give in? how much is not negotiating with terrorists worth? Not to mention the fact that that MASSIVE thing would drop straight at the place we just "saved". I guess it doesn't matetr because nobody down there survived the bombs anyway. So after much evaluation: It probably makes sense.

@timesthree5757 Жыл бұрын

That and it's london. Like new york, Chicago, and LA not gonna cry any.

@Canthus13 Жыл бұрын

So one of my friends in high school flies/flew the Bone. (Not sure if he's back in them now, or if he's still commanding a transport wing on an Army base) He turned down the opportunity to be an astronaut to stay in the B-!B. Mighty fine plane.

@lordsqueak Жыл бұрын

Wow, that was Cinematic af !!! But,, to be fair,, your bombs on east end, is nothing compared to the damage of that thing falling out of the sky. Infact, it is probably a very bad idea to shoot it down at all, until it's outside the city. Actually, if the Independance day aliens had figured that out, and just landed their ships on the city, instead of wasting all that energy on special effects, it would have been a very short movie.

@joshm1660 Жыл бұрын

So, really the Empire covertly trained you as a stormtrooper without your knowledge to ensure your fateful marksmanship.

@user-mc3nt6sg9d Жыл бұрын

I think you did more damage to the city than the stare destroyer could have hoped to do.

@raymondhurley44 Жыл бұрын

My back garden backs onto Fairfield airfield. We are having a bbq and watching the airshow in my own garden with my own toilet facilities.

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

nice...

@t.sorvig3540 Жыл бұрын

Star Wars has both Lasers and Blasters, but what you are referring to are called Turbolasers. They are the main anti-ship armament in the Star Wars universe. You'll see these most prominently on Capital ships, whether they be the Republic Venator Class, the CIS Lucrehulk, the Imperial Star Destroyer, etc. Blasters are generally handheld weapons (guns) carried by individuals and troops, though iirc some ground vehicles have scaled up blasters as armament. I am an enthusiast, not a nerd, thank you.

@vernonkuhns3561 Жыл бұрын

Why didn't you eject and parachute onto the starcruiser and save London by hand to hand??

@mfreed40k Жыл бұрын

Just ride space horses, that apparently is a thing now.

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

YES!

@brittgardner2923 Жыл бұрын

Realistically, this would halt an Imperial attack just on the grounds of, "Holy shit! They just dropped over half a million pounds of conventional explosives and six tactical nukes on one of their own most historic and important economic and cultural centers to kill ONE Star Destroyer! These people are savages! We're leaving!"

@Geolaminar Жыл бұрын

Tarkin doctrine: "we shall make the population fear us" Londoners: "the only thing I'm afraid of is leaving a thermonuclear carpet bombing half-finished"

@alicorn3924 Жыл бұрын

when we are the Tarkin Doctrine: **Doom Music intensifies**

@Creationeer Жыл бұрын

Some crazy bastard wanted to replace the B-1b's engines with the same ones from the F22 with thrust vectoring to make a super fast, "Heavy Fighter" for rapid response anti-air for US air space defence. Please do it :) I love the Lancer, great looking planes.

@frankbarnwell____ Жыл бұрын

Another silly thought. 4x F-22 vs a Klingon bird of prey. With AI Spock driving wearing the Trek 4 headband, of course.

@FlightDreamz Жыл бұрын

I was going to suggest a Star Trek vs. modern planes matchup (glad I'm not the only one thinking of that)

@vanguard9067 Жыл бұрын

For the love of god, not the headband please. Please!

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

COOL

@Flojer0 Жыл бұрын

The super sonic formation sounds like a sparrow brought some coconuts

@SuperSpud69 Жыл бұрын

This was super cool, I just wish the star destroyer was to scale. It looked so small at an altitude of 20k feet, but a star destroyer is about a mile in length, or only a quarter of that distance.

@Demonslayer20111 Жыл бұрын

Kinda depends what class of star deatroyer you are talking about. There are multuple classes and thus multiple sizes

@SuperSpud69 Жыл бұрын

@@Demonslayer20111 I'm referring to the Imperial class star destroyer, which in this video is shown.

@Sansarii_Minecraft Жыл бұрын

Imperial I or Imperial II class?

@SuperSpud69 Жыл бұрын

@@Sansarii_Minecraft It doesn't really matter, they're both about the same size

@OllamhDrab Жыл бұрын

Heehee, when attacking an ISD it's probably best not to come in head-on, that's where they have the most gunnery coverage, hence the wedge shape. Best to catch em from behind if possible, jus t break off best you can and probably head for the deck. :) Dunno how faithful that game mod is, though. :)

@rebelgaming1.5.14 Жыл бұрын

Somehow coming from below would be even more effective due to the fact the ISD has only light turbolasers below.

@OllamhDrab Жыл бұрын

@@rebelgaming1.5.14 Somewhat, indeed, though it's hard to do that with gravity bombs. :)

@rebelgaming1.5.14 Жыл бұрын

@@OllamhDrab cruise missiles or even ASMs might do the trick

@discofountain Жыл бұрын

I've loved B-1's since I was a kid, every great once in a while I can hear a B-1 flying over head.

@Nails077 Жыл бұрын

Someone missed an opportunity to make a B-1D variant.

@Foxiol Жыл бұрын

It would be awesome to reproduce the Independence Day movie scene when they deactivate the shields from the massive ship. And then all those ships flying all around in a massive battle.

@therealdebater Жыл бұрын

Incidentally, I've actually landed (in a Chipmunk) on that runway, and I can testify that it is huge. Even the sides of the runway were over the horizon, in that tiny aircraft. It was like a gnat landing on an elephant's (censored).

@walkerhartge9177 Жыл бұрын

The Heavy Laser Cannons which are like 100mm CIWS have a range of 5 kilometers and an ISD has 8 quad heavy Laser cannons for anti-fighter

@_Yep_Yep_ Жыл бұрын

Gotta hit the shield generators first bros.

@jrsmiff6590 Жыл бұрын

In the old xwing game an ISD went into hyperspace with my poor xwing directly in front of her bridge , I'm sure I got a posthumous Rebel Alliance medal of honor for that

@fernandorosati9450 Жыл бұрын

No, the Argentine never had a MIG-21 or non estern block military equipment, only it was a posibility by the J-7 to the Chines, but in 1969, the Argentinian Air Force by the Mirage IIIEA/DA, and in 1972/79 too packs of 25 each of the IAI M5 "Nesher" which here (in Arg.) we call "Dagger", all were in the Malvinas (Falkland) war.

@fourthdrawerdown6297 Жыл бұрын

This is what’s missing from the Kenobi tv series.

@KOS762 Жыл бұрын

I think they used mig-21 in the movie "Iron Eagle".. it was a cheesy movie, but still fun to watch.

@paulharrison2325 Жыл бұрын

I hope you feel better soon, thank you for the video, always entertaining.

@waterrr356 Ай бұрын

This is the funniest thing ever 😂, as a huge Star Wars fan I see this as an absolute win

@bigbore4498 Жыл бұрын

Well let’s see…. You missed the first time and bombed London, doing the Empire’s bidding for them. And destroyed all the B-1’s. Then you bombed London again but hit the star destroyer, losing all but one B-1. Then you nuked London 6(?) times. And finally you blew up the star destroyer sending it crashing into London. You guys are most definitely not AllState Insurance (“You’re in good hands with AllState”) for London. You should name your planes the Enola Gay Bockscar.

@panachevitz Жыл бұрын

You need to protect yourself from chaos...like me.

@alicorn3924 Жыл бұрын

that's one ISD as well, the Empire has thousands more at their disposal, and with enough "motivation", they could reach half a million ISDs

@kellywalker9268 Жыл бұрын

"Imperial Star Destroyer is a real bitch!!" Best one liner ever!!

@atoriusv5070 3 ай бұрын

If I remember right, the B-1b can go mach 2.5? Fast as hell for a bomber. Might've done better (lower casualties) with an ultra high altitude dive bombing run to put more bombs into the same spot instead of super long bomb lines. They're built for the upper atmosphere missions, so using them that way would've helped keep out of range yet get a solid bombing strafe.

@kellerweskier7214 Жыл бұрын

as a bit of a starwars nerd. this is kinda fun. The Star Destroyer has shields, but only phase-array, for protecting from energy weapons like laz0rs and stuff. It also has a atmospheric stabilization shield to hold atmosphere if the hull is breached It has no way of protecting from PHYSICAL attacks. so, bombs, bullets, battery. ect. will damage its hull.

@zevynozevyn4102 Жыл бұрын

The Rockwell is so beautiful 😍 love that byrd. So I did a little checking watched a video or two or three or four and came to the conclusion that on takeoff a Rockwell b1b lancer when it engages its afterburners it's simultaneous all four light at the same time.

@C0mmanderX Жыл бұрын

i dont think the B1's missed the star destroyer. theyre dropping bombs so the AI is thinking its on the ground. its not really designed to drop bombs on a thing thats 7000ft high

@mrhedgebull1658 Жыл бұрын

This.

@Kevin-hb7yq Жыл бұрын

This is exactly why these sorts of things need to be simulated.

@s87343jim Жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same thing as well.

@jeronb787 Жыл бұрын

Can’t tell if someone already answered B-one Motors are F101-GE-102s almost identical to the motor in the F-16. I was TDY @ RAF Fairford in 2018 with 2 bones from Dyess AFB. Miss working on her!

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

thx

@therussianbias3703 Жыл бұрын

there's also the problem that star destroyers have an engagement range of at least 75km and possibly up to 135km, it can reach speeds of over 900kmh so if they were to drop bombs within firing range they'd prob get shot down and if outside it it could move out of the way

@guitrplayr47pl0x60 Жыл бұрын

The most unrealistic part of this is being able to get that many B-1's in the air at the same time. Those jets are broke as fuuuuuuck

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

yip

@hueyiroquois3839 Жыл бұрын

10:05 If the afterburners don't light simultaneously, I think there might be a problem with yaw moment.

@Debbiebabe69 Жыл бұрын

You destroyed the ISD = win. You also destroyed the cesspit that is London = double win.

@PrinceWesterburg Жыл бұрын

I’m glad that you chose the option that was waaaay cheaper than paying them £1m! XD

@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын

PLEASE🙏 Stealth Squadron's VS Star Destroyer Fleet!👍👍 Stealth Squadron's Center Front Formation-- Flying in Two Formations of Five-- Ten F-22 Raptors! Few miles behind and above-- Two formations of Four YF-12A's! Flying underneath-- Five F-117's! Flying a few miles behind-- Eight B-2 Spirits formations of Two! Right Flank-- Fifteen F-35's in Three formations of Five! Few miles behind-- Ten F-117's in Two formations of Five! In the back-- Four B-2 Spirits in formations of Two! Left Flank Mirrors The Right Flank with one exception-- The Millennium Falcon with Four X-Wing's and Two Y-Wing's! Please have a Stealth way in back with a Nuke if all else fails! ;) Star Destroyer Fleet-- LOTS of Tie-Fighters, Good amount of Tie-Interceptors, Eight Tie-Hunters, and Four Corvette Raiders!! Corvettes start airborne, it'd be cool if YF-12's target Corvettes!👍

@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын

When your feeling better of course, hope your well soon🙏

@thomasthurman7840 Жыл бұрын

Just gonna say, that’s a LOT of models and calculating for their computers

@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын

@@thomasthurman7840 they've done similar things in the past, should be no problem, I've seen them use more aircraft than this before ;)

@Anarchy_420 Жыл бұрын

@@thomasthurman7840 its right around 100 aircraft for the Stealth Squadron's... much less for The Star Destroyer Fleet, shouldn't be a problem

@tylerkim1103 Жыл бұрын

Yo new video lets go

@bigmikegaming1583 Жыл бұрын

great video guys. keep it up. love these videos.

@adamvaliant2949 Жыл бұрын

i like the unguided bombs over residential areas! It's a nice touch 👍

@profo4544 Жыл бұрын

This is probably what would happen lol, it would just use its point defense lasery batterys to just shoot at the incoming bombers like a hundred phalanyx's shooting at you only they have much further range.

@russkatherealoriginal6904 Жыл бұрын

You do realize how fast modern aircraft are?

@profo4544 Жыл бұрын

@@russkatherealoriginal6904 Those batterys are meant to track fighters in space moving much faster than atmospheric fighters so, they wouldnt have a issue shooting or leading them, theyre targetting systems are advanced.

@supremecaffeine2633 Жыл бұрын

@@profo4544 Star War vehicles and weapons are actually pretty slow and short ranged compares to modern weapons. A normal person can literally see and dodge blaster bolts.

@profo4544 Жыл бұрын

@@supremecaffeine2633 Yeah people could see the deathstars laser to before they died, ur point? The deathstar was 140-160 km long lol, with class 4 hyperdrives to. So a Moon, going lightspeed isnt fast to you idk what to say lol idk, have u read any expanded universe book? the stuff that lucas approved, long before disney came around, theyll get into some of what the weapons are capable of. On the movie screen it might look like they can dodge this and that, you have to realize its a movie. A proton torpedo might not be as atompsherically as fast as some missiles we have, but a proton torpedo locked on isnt going to miss.. Heres a small quote "Proton torpedoes were capable of incredible maneuverability, such as making a 90-degree turn within a turning circle of one meter.[4] They could also ignore ray shields but were stopped by particle shields."

@profo4544 Жыл бұрын

@@supremecaffeine2633 By the way i have a playlist on my channel with unabridged audiobook versions of new jedi order series, almost impossible to find audiobooks, Rare stuff, only made for specific librarys for blind people. The njo book series is like 19 books, not including short storys, so getting them all uploaded nobody has even fully done yet, unabridged. Abridged you can find them, but itll take a 10 hour book and turn it into 3 hours. If ur a real starwars fan, not some fake new fan, or some fan whose just only watched the movies, check these out. This has the best material, the authors who wrote the expanded universe collabed with george lucas, so there much more legit then disney crap.

@MarkMeadows90 Жыл бұрын

Silly mission, but hopefully nothing like that happens in real life lol

@VulcanM61 Жыл бұрын

I heard shit is going down in 2025, have your bomber B1 lancer ready just in case

@MarkMeadows90 Жыл бұрын

@@VulcanM61 sure, if I can afford one lol

@jamesscalzo3033 Жыл бұрын

Loved the video @Grim Reapers! Can't wait for the next video man! From what I can tell each B-1 Lancer is $317 Million American Dollars, and you've lost about 20. So you've cost the U.S. Military about $6,340,000,000 USD. This isn't taking into account the 2 F-14D Tomcats that you've lost as well as all the Bombs that you've loaded and lost on this mission as well. All in all, quite the "Smashing" hit.

@mphelps7919 Жыл бұрын

14:53 - Cap channelling Emperor Palpatine.

@opencirclefleet Жыл бұрын

I believe that the point defense cannons on the Star Destroyer would be able to reach the bombers even at 20,000 feet and would probably shoot all the bombers down before they could release their bombs. I also am skeptical that the amount of bombs used would be enough to take it down (even if they all hit) as you would first have to take down the shields, and there is a good chance the shield systems on the ship could take most if not all of those bombs before going down. The ship would probably escape relatively unscathed even if all the bombs hit. There is also a chance that the MiGs would have been shot down before they could release their bombs. However, I think one or two direct hits from a nuke could probably one-shot a star destroyer even with shields up.

@theoneneo5024 Жыл бұрын

What if the shields are only designed to stop energy weapons. Remember the fighters routinely fly below shield level on Star Destroyers.

@opencirclefleet Жыл бұрын

@@theoneneo5024 Ships in Star Wars have three types of shields. Ray shields to stop energy weapons, particle shields to stop physical projectiles, and navigational shields to stop radiation and asteroids. The reason starfighters can fly below shields is that they are moving slow enough that the particle shields can't stop them. The bombs were moving at supersonic speeds, which is most likely too fast to go through the particle shields.

@sunny-sq6ci Жыл бұрын

what about b2s? wonder if stealth would actually work against it.

@Akrilloth Жыл бұрын

I seem to recon they use strange quantum-tech to pinpoint the miniature gravity wells of enemy vessels rather than just radar, so probably not, unless you have the tech to jam said detection.

@k-dog7013 9 ай бұрын

Star desroyer: “give us $1m ransom” Grim Reapers using many millions of dollars in weapons, destroying a squadron of bombers and nuking London: “we don’t negotiate with terrorists”

@Hand6108 Жыл бұрын

It would be a miracle to get a 10 ship to all take off. Ha. Great video.

@subbot8077 Жыл бұрын

Awesome video! The B-1 is powered by four GE F101 engines, specifically the -102 variant on the B-1B

@brokenursa9986 Жыл бұрын

To address Cap's question, in Star Wars, blasters are generally small arms. Mounted cannons are called lasers, and the big, anti-ship lasers are turbolasers.

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

thx

@cockatoo010 Жыл бұрын

Therapist: the supersonic box formation doesn't exist, it can't hurt you. Supersonic box formation: 12:06

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

lols

@michaellawrence6677 Жыл бұрын

I knew you’d miss. I loved that very well indeed. Thanks, I needed that.

@5Andysalive Жыл бұрын

The fps drop gave me a good old Kerbal pre-64bit pre-explosion freeze nostalgia flash. It was the harbinger of the impendent booms.

@JK-zq9vw Жыл бұрын

I’ve actually sat in a imitation spot on a Taxiway and watched as a similar size group of B-1’s took off. My favorite was after spending 72 hours preparing and loading the aircraft with fuel and a full load of bombs. It took a lot of runway for it to get in the air. The wings drooped down and then lifted up right before it broke ground. The pilots tipped their wings as they past the parking spot on the ramp as a Thanks. Said aircraft took a 6 mo. summer getaway

@Slikx666 12 күн бұрын

A classic GR video. 😀👍

@WookyDooky Жыл бұрын

When the bombs exploded, my guys computer was on life support.

@RTS907 Жыл бұрын

Thanks Cap and RC for keeping the world safe !

@josesierraromero8316 Жыл бұрын

Thrawn: naive natives. Captain Keeran: orbital bombardment at my command.

@anthonykodaski6161 Жыл бұрын

The prototype for the B1 was labeled B-1-A The production model was labeled B-1-B And guess what the proposed mark two of the B1 is designated If you said the B-1-C you’re wrong for it is the B-1-R (R for regional) The B-One-R

@alcamorim Жыл бұрын

Awesome video guys! I was laughing so hard. Very good work!

@BorisBlade7 Жыл бұрын

Came for the action, stayed for the Lawn Dawn.

@GazEdwards8690 Жыл бұрын

Finally the answer I have always wanted since a new hope.

@anishdynamo Жыл бұрын

1 million pounds>Billions of pounds looks like the queen signed off on it.

@ryanhooper4660 Жыл бұрын

B one... so happy I figured that out before this video!

@TheFreshman321 Жыл бұрын

If this thing was over London with hostile intent there would be 30 Typhoons each one armed with 4 Storm Shadow cruise missiles with nearly 400km stand off range. That’s 120 cruise missiles in all. The U.K. has around 800 of these missile. In addition, land based air defence systems like Land Ceptor, Starstreak and Royal Navy’s Type 45s Sea Vipers missiles would be more than sufficient In neutralising the invader. By comparison to send large strategic bombers with dumb bombs literally flying over a target within range of the hostile’s weapons, so as to drop said dumb bombs, makes this scenario complete cobblers.

@kathrynvega6867 Жыл бұрын

Killing a starship of that scale in-atmo over any remotely populated area is a pure bad idea; they're powered by small suns. This fact should give a scale of how insane the power scaling in star wars is anyway, and why ANY scenario crossing it over with real life is "complete cobblers" anyway.

@Rikard_Nilsson 9 ай бұрын

You should do an "Independence Day" recreation, have a bunch of F18's attack a locust mothership

@matcampbell-hill6939 9 ай бұрын

This was hilarious. Please make sure you are ill at LEAST once a week in future!! 😂😂

@GarageBandSuperheros Жыл бұрын

Oh My God It's So Beautiful!

@MacTechG4 Жыл бұрын

Maybe I’m missing the obvious, but doesn’t an ISD have a massive blind spot behind it? (engine cluster) Why not approach from aft; fly over the top (aren’t Turbolasers side mounted on the edge of the triangle hull?) and drop ordinance from above and behind?

@73jbirch Жыл бұрын

Really fun video!

@danreyn 8 ай бұрын

Dangit, Cap. If you're going to turn your engine off, that makes you a projectile. The bomb you release is also a projectile. Want to release it directly over the ISD? Fine. Aim your plane at the ISD!!! The bomb has your velocity when you release it. It doesn't fall directly down unless your velocity is directly down. If you point your plane off target and release, you're effectively throwing the bomb in that direction. It's not that complicated

@revanati222 Жыл бұрын

Lon-don is eternally grateful for the efforts of the air force. Not only did they save us from paying a million pounds sterling in ransome, we now no longer have need of street lighting because we glow in the dark. This effort only cost the paultry sum of 1.3 billion US dollars worth of aircraft losses, and about a trillion pounds worth of property damage.

@robertkb64 Жыл бұрын

In the SR-71 lighting the afterburner requires an ignition charge, and the aircraft only carries a finite number. There’s a counter just aft of the throttle showing how many are left for each engine. In a typical mission they’d fly in economical cruise without the afterburner, and then ignite it as they approached dangerous territory so that by they time they’re in range of a potential interception they’d be well into Mach 3. I’ve ever seen the inside of a B1, so no idea if they use a similar method.

@danteinouye6098 Жыл бұрын

I just gotta put it out there; if this were real to star wars lore, the ISD-II that we see here actually carries *zero* point defense, and the octuple barbette turbolasers we see on it here are too slow to track fighters unless theyre flying straight and level. Remember; an X wing has an atmospheric speed of 1000kph, which isnt supersonic, and we see fighters tangle with star destroyers in atmosphere quite a bit. What i'd be worried about is the TIE screen of 72 fighters, but other than that, an ISD-II shouldn't be an issue for modern strike fighters to get near. wether the shields block nukes is another story altogether

@thelightlord6081 Жыл бұрын

The big lasers are Turbo Lasers I do believe. Blasters are like the handheld guns. You also have Ion cannons

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

thx

@ChrisCebelenski Жыл бұрын

Those B1b's are louder than a very loud thing IRL. I had one taxi next to me at an air show in TX one year (I was in a cub - great contrast). AND. IT. WAS. DAMN. LOUD.

@mitchconner403 Жыл бұрын

YEEES I always love when u upload a new video. You are a very SMART person and a I VALUE ur EXISTENCE everyday.

@grimreapers Жыл бұрын

wow! That's the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me/us. x

@seangere9698 Жыл бұрын

Blasters are hand held. Ship mounted are Turbo lasers. The ISD shot them down just like the first time. You can see all the laser bolts in the sky just before the Bones started falling out of the sky.

@jeffkardosjr.3825 Жыл бұрын

Snow speeders had blasters.

@beermanmccool1226 Жыл бұрын

"That could not have been planned better!" *Londoner in the Ruins:* "I disagree!"

@davidshoyt1979 Жыл бұрын

realistically the bones will all be in their hangers sounding like a 76 Buick failing to turn over, while mechanics are outside the Bone kicking the side of the engines hoping that will work to get them to spin up. After 45 minutes the pilots throw their hands up in frustration as the mechanics are spotted sifting through spare parts from the three cannibalized Bones sitting in the corner. Empire wins although 37 of their TIE fighters crash due to random bird strikes, one from pilot error and a few because a boy with a sling shot got a few lucky shots in. In the end At-Ats were deployed for the ground campaign but failed to be able to turn around on the narrow London streets and the Storm troopers were reprimanded for goofing around on the London Eye.