Could a Single WWI Battleship Win the Battle of Trafalgar?

Рет қаралды 142,588

Күн бұрын

In this captivating Parry This Alternate History video, we delve into a speculative journey back to the pivotal Battle of Trafalgar in 1805, and introduce an intriguing twist: the presence of the French battleship "Danton," a leviathan from World War I, equipped with advanced technology and under the command of Admiral Louis Dartige du Fournet. How could the Danton have altered the course of this historic battle and, by extension, reshaped history itself?
Other Alternate History Battles: • Alternate History Battles
🔍 Video Highlights:
Historical Overview of Trafalgar: Dive into the details of the Battle of Trafalgar, its strategic importance, and the tactical genius of Admiral Lord Nelson that established British naval supremacy.
The Danton - A Technological Marvel: Explore the formidable capabilities of the Danton, its armaments, and how its presence could have offered the French fleet an overwhelming advantage.
Hypothetical Battle Scenario: Witness an imaginative recount of the battle with the Danton's participation, analyzing strategic moves, pivotal moments, and the potential outcome of this alternate historical scenario.
Implications of a French Victory: Contemplate the far-reaching consequences of a French triumph at Trafalgar on the Napoleonic Wars, naval warfare, and the geopolitical landscape of the 19th century.
Conclusion: Reflect on the fascinating nature of alternate history and the power of "what if" scenarios in challenging our understanding of the past.
📚 What You'll Learn:
The historical significance of the Battle of Trafalgar.
The technological prowess of the WWI French battleship Danton.
The potential impact of advanced warfare technology on historical naval battles.
The broader implications of altering key historical events.
🔥 Join us on this speculative voyage as we challenge the boundaries of historical possibility and reimagine the past. Whether you're a history buff, naval warfare enthusiast, or a fan of alternate history narratives, this video promises a thought-provoking exploration of one of history's most iconic naval battles with a twist that could have changed the world.

Пікірлер: 861

@ParryThis 2 ай бұрын

For anyone wondering why i used a WWI battleship, i know it is overkill, lol. It was a specific request.

@christiandauz3742 2 ай бұрын

Maybe future scenarios should focus more on the aftermath? Or have multiple battles involved?

@legiran9564 Ай бұрын

I have an interesting request. Let's imagine the Battle of Sunda Strait on the night of 28 February - 1 March 1942. Then swap all the ABDA ships with World Of Warships Super Ships. USS Houston with USS Annapolis, HMAS Perth with HMS Edgar and HNLMS Evertsen with HSwMS Dalarna. All the new ships have Autoloading guns and mid 1950s radar and firecontrol. Would the ABDA flotilla survive an entire Japanese Armada?

@hazchemel Ай бұрын

Hmmm. I reckon the Danton would take at least 2 ships under fire.

@hazchemel Ай бұрын

@@legiran9564also, I feel the pain of the Dutch fleet. For the Dutch mariner who survived the Japanese Empire, which means surviving a long sentence of PoW, a rare and remarkable event no doubt, and after release from PoW, learning of the success of the submarine flotilla whatever.

@BioHunter1990 Ай бұрын

Most of the battleships in WWII, where WWI era ships. Dreadnoughts and super dreadnoughts where the staple until the late 1930s and into the 1940s with the develop of "modern" fast battleships. So it's all good there. :) Edit: Ah, the Danton. A semi-dreadnought. Basically cheap dreadnought. The turbines are a huge advantage...nevermind the vast arsenal of guns (This is what seperated the Danton class from true dreadnoughts...not "all big gun".) The 3in guns with HE would burn everything they hit. Larger guns probably massive overpenetration before detonating. And AP shells...useless.

@scottlangseth8823 2 ай бұрын

Having toured the last remaining WW1 battleship, the USS Texas (BB35). She doesn't even need even need to shoot, she can run them down, speed of 21 knots and an armored bow.

@covertcounsellor6797 2 ай бұрын

Agree with you, Scott, but what about the USS Missouri (BB63)? I’d love to visit the Texas, mind you. Is she actually seaworthy or in dry dock?

@johnfisher9692 2 ай бұрын

@@covertcounsellor6797 The trouble with taking Missouri back to this era is fuel. Once she exhausted her fuel oil there would be no way to replace it. At least Texas was coal powered though I don't know if they would have the extensive stocks required to keep Texas going, that's a lot of coal for this period.

@johnfisher9692 2 ай бұрын

Poor ol Danton could only do 18.5 knots. Though in an era where speeds were single digits she's a speed boat as long as her coal stocks hold out. Could the industry of this time produce enough quality coal to keep her operational? They could not replace any ammunition

@Leoluvesadmira 2 ай бұрын

@johnfisher9692 sure if you do the WW1 configuration l. The texas was refitted to burn oil in 1922 or 1926 when the added torpedo blisters

@scottlangseth8823 2 ай бұрын

@@johnfisher9692 USS Texas was covert to oil between the wars.

@Fish1701A Ай бұрын

Child: My Lord how did we win at Trafalgar? Napoleon: We cheated.

@Butter_Warrior99 Ай бұрын

VIVE LA FRANCE!

@Galikalou Ай бұрын

@@Butter_Warrior99 why the A to "Vive" ? But still Vive la france !

@Butter_Warrior99 Ай бұрын

@@Galikalou Oops. My bad.

@deadsoldiertr Ай бұрын

"There was nothing *they* can do."

@lontongstroong Ай бұрын

HON HON HON BAGUETTE!!!

@mirangermanll 2 ай бұрын

Without watching the video yet..... Yes!

@memonk11 2 ай бұрын

Read my mind.

@miketogwell1000 2 ай бұрын

Without watching the video, a WW1 cruiser could win the battle Probably even a destroyer

@mirangermanll 2 ай бұрын

@@miketogwell1000 Maybe even a US Coast Guard High Endurance Cutter! lol

@whyjnot420 Ай бұрын

@@miketogwell1000 "Hell, a ww1 era destroyer could have.' Was literally the first thought I had when I read the video title. Actual metal (even if not armor proper) and exploding munitions are a hell of a thing. Though neither of those would really be the kicker. That would be the engines. A ww1 destroyer would simply be able to dictate the battles terms and thus be allowed to fight it on whatever terms they wanted. Personally I wonder what range something like Victory would need to be at to puncture the splinter proof stuff on a destroyer with their solid shot. My guess is somewhere around standard fighting range for the ship, on the closer end of this spectrum. Since those guns were far more powerful than they were accurate and that accuracy was what really dictated the ranges they fought at, rather than the effective range. Even at the Battle of Manilla Bay the accuracy of the USN ships is something like 1% (this is somewhat misleading due to how the battle was fought, but not that misleading). A fact that was still pretty true even in ww1. To put it simply anyways. It wasn't until the advent of RADAR guided guns that happened right at the end of the big gun era, that this truly changes. Regardless of how much better the optical rangefinders had gotten. addendum: Metal that isn't proper armor is far weaker than a lot of people seem to think. Just look at the damage done to the Little Willie tank prototype simply by trying to tow it. (around the pistol port on the front). As stated by the Tank Museum: "...and you can see the damage at the front where somebody tried to tow the tank by threading a line through one of its windows. It’s not made of armour plate, only boilerplate after all."

@Michael-sb8jf Ай бұрын

An iron clad could probably do it if it had the right circumstances and not overwhelmed. But that's pushing it. A few more might be needed to prevent boardings. Which is how I could see a flotilla defeating a single ironclad.

@johnfisher9692 2 ай бұрын

It takes nearly 16 min to say "Obviously" The technological gap is so huge as to make the question dumb. As long as her coal stocks and ammunition held out the Danton (the last French Pre-Dreadnought actually built after HMS Dreadnought) would rule the oceans in this time period

@kevinyaucheekin1319 Ай бұрын

Even La Glorie, would have been a bad choice, given how overpowered it was against Napoleonic era ships of the line. Much least, one of the most overpowered of the pre dreadnoughts to serve in the French navy. 😊

@nickklavdianos5136 Ай бұрын

Ammunition stocks aren't of particular importance, since you can just ram the wooden ships.

@johnfisher9692 Ай бұрын

@@nickklavdianos5136 True but ramming can still damage the ship so why risk it?

@ryanbrewis6990 Ай бұрын

@@johnfisher9692Wood ship getting hit by 18k ton of steel at nearly 20 knots? Not sure that would damage the pre-dread much tbh

@daaa3932 Ай бұрын

The Franco-Spanish Fleet trying to incorporate a World War I Pre-Dreadnought would be like a squadron of Spitfires from the Battle of Britain trying to work alongside an F-15 Eagle... They can't work together. The Danton wouldn't even have to get up steam; her guns would shatter the British Fleet long before they got into range.

@fembotheather3785 2 ай бұрын

The real question to be asked is whether Danton would even need to bother using its main guns. Its 9 inch guns and defensive guns were faster-firing and entirely capable of wrecking wooden ships.

@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 2 ай бұрын

Factoring the fast reload and scopes, oh yeah you cripple then kill,

@fembotheather3785 2 ай бұрын

@@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 I didn't say they wouldn't use them, just that they probably wouldn't need to use them. They have them so they might as well! :)

@jonathanallard2128 Ай бұрын

I hypothesize that a single 12 inch broadside could sink a wooden first rate. High explosive of this caliber vs wood! X4. They wouldn't last long if they did.

@fembotheather3785 Ай бұрын

@@jonathanallard2128 My point was merely that their more rapid-firing secondaries and defensive armaments could probably do it too, and probably more quickly, and that there's really not much the enemy fleet can do about it. The smart play might be to save the 12" guns for the ships that try to run while the secondaries and defensive guns tear up everything that's closer. The only limits the battleship would have would be its supply of ammunition and fuel, and eventually spare parts. As for fuel, coal was theoretically obtainable.

@jonathanallard2128 Ай бұрын

@@fembotheather3785 Oh I didn't try to disagree with you! In fact I 100% agree with your comment I just wanted to add a new and different hypothesis, see if you'd agree with this one. But yeah for sure the secondaries only would shred them wooden ships no problem.

@ronmaximilian6953 Ай бұрын

Pinnacle of engineering? The Danton was obsolete when it was launched. The British, Americans, and Japanese already had dreadnoughts at that point. Danton was a late pre-dreadnought.

@BattleshipOrion Ай бұрын

We aint try'na hate here, but aint the of the video the fact that a ww1 era battleship (no matter how ugly, or obsolete (I prefer Japanese Dreadnoughts, including the Ise's to a point)) went back to 1805, it would still be a pinnacle of engineering. That class is also pinnacle of what a POS BB looks like in my opinion.

@nickklavdianos5136 Ай бұрын

To be fair, the Dantons are extremely powerful pre dreadnoughts. They have their four main 12 inch guns, but also twelve 9,4 inch guns. They're powerful to the extent that they have a good shot against the early dreadnoughts, albeit limited by speed. If I ever had to take a pre dreadnought to fight against a dreadnought, I'd probably take the a Danton, Satsuma or Lord Nelson.

@josynaemikohler6572 Ай бұрын

Danton was designed as a pre dreadnoughts, because France believed after Tsushima, that the combat ranges would remain relativly short. At which point this configuration would have a higher rate of fire, and higher broadside weight compared to the early dreadnoughts, like Dreadnought, Nassau class, South Carolina, and being well able to overpower those. However, as we now know in hindsight, the assumption about combat ranges would be incorrect, and the 9.4" guns would fall behind on longer ranges, compared to fewer 12" guns.

@tutel7 Ай бұрын

uhm ackshually, it was a semi-dreadnought

@justinmurphy2227 Ай бұрын

This is exactly what I was thinking to myself. Even the Japanese had vessels that surpassed this.

@senecanero3874 2 ай бұрын

There were 6 hours between the beginning of the battle and the first fighting, the Danton would try trickshots in that time and the 9.2 inch guns would shoot high explosive guns, even the 4 inch would destroy 1st rates with ease.

@windwalker5765 2 ай бұрын

The one thing I wonder is, does the Danton have shell fuzes which would be armed by 2 feet thick hardwood? I think the main guns definitely and the secondaries probably would act like solid shot, go right through the ships of the line without exploding. She'd still do a tremendous amount of damage, but more along the line of holing them at or below the waterline.

@mikemcghin5394 2 ай бұрын

The 4 inch guns Shell's will arm well the ones on USS Walker did when she engaged Wooden Ships

@5peciesunkn0wn Ай бұрын

@@windwalker5765 if they're using HE with impact fuses, yes. Yes they will.

@Peppabot Ай бұрын

I guess they’d have the hit u see the waterline and hope the water would be strong enough to detonate the shells under the ship when it comes to the main batteries. Probably HE shells will do fine, but AP shells with any kind of fuse I doubt will blow up any ship. Small caliber HE shells will blow anything out of the water

@DarthEstebanMontoya Ай бұрын

I'm pretty sure you'd over-pen even with HE.

@MaxwellAerialPhotography 2 ай бұрын

We saw less extreme version of this during the Opium Wars and Crimean War, where iron clads completely obliterated older more numerous fleets of wooden ships of the line.

@Real_OSHA_Unsafety_Engineer Ай бұрын

Yi Sun Shin's Turtle ships proved that 2 turtle ships and 11 Regular ships could wreck the 300 combined warships Japanese fleet, 300 years before first steam powered iron clads exists.

@GorillaCrewWarGaming 9 күн бұрын

@@Real_OSHA_Unsafety_Engineer YEP! The Japanzees are smart.

@waynesworldofsci-tech Ай бұрын

If it’s HMS Warspite she’d take out all three fleets, then proceeded to intervene in the Battle of Waterloo. How? Damned if I know. She’s HMS Warspite.

@johnplummer4785 Ай бұрын

Elaborate? I sense this is funny but I want to know why it’s funny

@murkywateradminssions5219 Ай бұрын

HMS Warspite or more affectionately known as the grand old lady, snipped an Italian battleship at a distance of 24 kilometres. She was also present to provide naval gun fire during operations conducted in Italy and during the Normandy landings. She's a relatively well decorated battleship in the Royal Navy

@waynesworldofsci-tech Ай бұрын

@@johnplummer4785 Warspite had a steering casualty during the Battle of Jutland. Somehow the repairs didn’t quite take, and HMS Warspite developed a troubling tendency to ‘have steering issues’ which invariably had her heading straight towards the nearest enemy ship, irrespective of what the captain had ordered. Her final steering issue happened on the way to the razor blade factory. Check Drachinifel’s Guides on the Queen Elizabeth class battleships and HMS Warspite. Drach does an incredible job.

@danieljones7843 Ай бұрын

HMS Warspite would have been the great equaliser!

@murkywateradminssions5219 Ай бұрын

@@danieljones7843 no. Warspite would've seal clubbed the poor thing HMS Warspite is a queen Elizabeth class super dreadnought. In her ww1 configuration, she had four, 15 inch guns in twin gun turret configuration (giving her eight `5 inch guns), 13 inches of armor at the water belt, 7-10 inches of armor at the barbettes and 11-13 inches of armor at her gun turret. the Danton has two twin 305mm guns (one at the front and the back), twelve 240mm guns (at the sides) and sixteen 75mm guns at the lower deck. The Danton's armor at the water belt is only 7-10 inches thick, 10-13 inches of armor for the turrets and 10.5 inches of armor for the conning tower. the Danton's speed and Warspite's speed is somewhat similar at 24knts for the Warspite while 19knts for the Danton's. however, Warspite has the advantage of significantly bigger calibers whilst being able to bring all of her main guns to bare whilst the Danton can only bring half of it due to pre-dreadnought battleship designs being the way the are. if we were bringing ww2 Warspite into question, Danton would've been sniped from 20 kilometers guaranteed. The RN giulio Cesare can attest to Warspite's gunnery

@ThubanDraconis 2 ай бұрын

The difference in combat capability between the two eras is truly insane. A single WWI battleship would be largely immune to cannon fire, denting the hull plating and scratching the paint isn't going to deter a battleship. And if the BB stayed out at a couple thousand yards then few cannon balls would even manage to that little damage. Meanwhile, a ship of the line might be about 250 feet long, that's feet, not meters. meaning that a single HE shell blowing up mid ship would me a mere 125 feet, at most, from everyone on the ship. That's about 38 meters for metric people. Wooden walls and decks would provide some protection from shrapnel but would also serve to channel the blast wave down whatever deck was hit. That's easily within the kill zone of a 12" explosive shell. And while not everyone would be killed by a single hit, the damage would be severe enough, with enough casualties, that the ship hit would likely be combat ineffective... to the extent it ever was combat effective when faced with a WWI era battleship. And this doesn't count the fires started by the hot shrapnel... or the chance of powder magazines being hit. A single secondary shell (about 5" give or take) would still do massive damage, start fires, and kill lots of people. It wouldn't take too many secondary hits to guarantee that the wooden ship was either a burning and sinking wreck or bunch of floating matchsticks after a powder explosion. The WWI battleship has no concern about wind direction and can out run the sailing ships in any direction so the sailing shops can't run or outmaneuver the battleship. A WWI battleship at Trafalgar would be nothing but a simple gunnery exercise.

@jlsabinas8578 26 күн бұрын

A simple yet extremely gratifying excercise for the French, lol

@windwalker5765 2 ай бұрын

Honestly, this might be the most one-sided engagement this channel has ever done. I think it's another case of bringing technology too advanced to make for an interesting engagement, despite the fact that it's only a hundred years' difference. I think this battle is where you should have sent the Civil War ironclads that went to Lepanto. Oceangoing ironclads like the _Kalamazoo_ class are resistant but not immune to cannon, have more powerful guns than a man o' war but a far lower rate of fire. But most importantly, while they were slightly slower than sailing ships, they could maneuver in any manner they chose regardless of wind.

@Neneset 2 ай бұрын

That wouldn't make any difference. Those ships were very much closer to Admiral Nelson's ships in capability than they were to Admiral Jellico's. Armor, weapons, fire control and engines improved by orders of magnitude between the 1860s and 1910s.

@windwalker5765 2 ай бұрын

@@Neneset That's the point, I want a fight that's close enough to be interesting... not an ass whooping like this.

@Neneset 2 ай бұрын

@@windwalker5765 Perhaps I read your position backwards. I read it as 1860s vs 1910s and you seem to have meant it as 1800s vs 1860s. While not as dominant as the other, the 1860s were well in advance of the 1800s. Particularly the advent of the explosive shell replacing solid shot changed naval warfare.

@windwalker5765 2 ай бұрын

@@Neneset Correct. But I still think it's close enough to be interesting... given the same number of ships per side (and ignoring that the US only built 4 Kalamazoo class). The ironclad breechloading guns have range, power, and shrapnel... but only 4 guns per ship, vs. 70-100 for the men of war. The ironclad has a massive maneuver and defense advantage, but any damage it takes is much harder to repair, where the carpenter can patch holes and mend sails to a greater extent. To me, it comes down to, can the men of war survive long enough to start some leaks or cause engine damage?

@BattleshipOrion Ай бұрын

@@windwalker5765 Not gonna lie, it'd be more interesting to see 1880's-1890's pre-Dreads/ironclads fight a whole floating forest, no disrespect to wooden sailing ships, but at least give a noticeable difference otherwise it has to many numbers, & I'm sorry but I have a game that does that for me. Two of 'em in fact, both of them don't have wooden sailing ships either. Now if we really wanna see a fight with a huge gap of 140+ years, send the Fletcher's, Benson's, or Allen M Sumner's against those wooden sailing ships.

@pavelslama5543 Ай бұрын

The one issue with these scenarios is that it is not "what if the French had Danton", but "what if the French were given Danton, a ship from the future". The core of that issue is that this would of course appear as a supernatural event, which would shape the morale of the whole event without the ship even taking a direct role in it.

@andrewwilson6726 Ай бұрын

Yeah if a Brit ship even got the chance to see that thing they would've disappeared sooooo fast.

@MarcoRangos Ай бұрын

Bro who cares lmao 😂 It’s cool to think about and that’s all that matters.

@RLD_Media Ай бұрын

The Brit’s probably wouldn’t even consider fighting the battle if they had even the notion that they were given a distinct advantage by some supernatural entity. Clearly the cards aren’t in their favor lol.

@pavelslama5543 21 күн бұрын

@@andrewwilson6726 Yeah. I mean, the Brits were brave, there´s no denying that. They have attacked almost 2 times stronger foe. But they werent absolutely crazy or suicidal. If they saw something like Danton on the horizon, they would run like hell. And they would be right to do so.

@johnshepherd9676 2 ай бұрын

Stupid question. A battleship is overkill. It could just ram every Franco-Spanish ship. A single destroyer could have won at Trafalgar.

@theicmn Ай бұрын

I'm curious how a PT boat would do. Would torpedoes do much to a galleon?

@daiquylam3401 Ай бұрын

@@theicmn it would blow a hole so big it might be consider as an asteroid crater or just straight up split the ship in half

@fenriders7008 Ай бұрын

@@theicmnyeah a heavy ww1 torp would break the spine of a ship of the line. They tore car sized holes in dreadnaughts…

@uteriel282 Ай бұрын

the 100mm guns on ww1 destroyers alone would decimate any wooden galleon from far outside their own gun ranges. because theyre unarmored wooden ships any shot into the magazine is an insta kill.

@itsyvonblitz6819 Ай бұрын

Stupid question Fun video

@seventhson27 Ай бұрын

IF we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.

@dextercochran4916 Ай бұрын

Assuming she comes pre-stocked with fuel, knowledgeable crew, ammunition, and supplies, then yes. Easily.

@evangelinetsukyomi9023 Ай бұрын

For once it's less a hassle since the fuel is simple coal,they can refuel anywhere. The ammo would be more bothersome ( the cannon used sac of powder so it's less difficult to make than full brass cartridge but they still would need to know what's the composition of powder in it to be able to remake them and at that time the ammo would be limited to non explosive round solid shot) The maintenance would not be so difficult for the time until the ship need to dry dock to repair the hull, or if anything of importance break if Napoleon era engineer cannot remake them good enough to replace the broken piece( they have a limited supply of spare piece and reparations material on board )

@triadwarfare Ай бұрын

@@evangelinetsukyomi9023 maybe the ship could just ram itself against the wooden ships once it runs out of ammo.

@pahtar7189 Ай бұрын

A few thoughts: 1. This scenario would be more realistic if the British had heard of a French super weapon, so wouldn't be caught entirely off guard. 2. The Danton would have great success if it launched brotasides from directly in front of a ship of the line as for gunnery, direction was easier to determine than distance. 3. It seems likely the Danton could defeat the British fleet without any help from the French/Spanish fleet. 4. This scenario would be much more intriguing if the French substituted several ironclad ships like those used in the American Civil War, 50 years ahead rather than 100.

@hardcharging Ай бұрын

Here's another thought: you're bringing in a WWI ship with a WWI naval leader. I think if anything he's gonna tell Nelson and the opposing French ships to stop quarreling like children and focus on keeping central Europe in check, and one salvo would be more than enough to make both sides cooperate.

@ShadowDragon8685 Ай бұрын

Here's another thing to think about: the French Admiral's oaths are to the _Third Republic._ Is he going to be any friend of Bonaparte? Would he even be willing to _collude_ with the English (remember, he has just come through WWI, he was allied with the English), in the hopes that the might of _Danton_ can bring about the end of Napoleon _faster?_ Possibly he might set himself up as Emperor, or more likely, bust out some history books and textbooks on the Third Republic (there'll be _some_ literature aboard) and try to kickstart things, along with the Industrial Revolution. After all, he's gonna need good machinery to repair Danton. Wear and tear will be its enemies.

@meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee2 Ай бұрын

Surely Nelson with 9x 16" guns is going to turn the Danton into scrap metal in minutes, it even used Trafalgar type point blank firing tactics against Bismark.

@PeterMuskrat6968 Ай бұрын

This is Mike Tyson versus coughing baby. Dat baby gon die

@ctw30002000 2 ай бұрын

A lot of what is described here takes place pretty much exactly like that in the later installments of Taylor Anderson's alternative history "Destroyermen" series - wooden ships of the line versus steamers with armour and modern naval guns. Granted, in that case the "modern" ships are far smaller than the Danton, WW1 destroyer(s) in fact, and the wooden warships in some cases even feature crude steam propulsion, but the only chance the liners have is to somehow lure the modern steamers into range and try for a long-range broadside, going for a shotgun effect. The ability to maneuvre at will independent of the wind and having far longer range should make Danton vs Nelson's fleet a foregone conclusion. Explosive shells do a real number on ships made of oak.

@npc.no1 2 ай бұрын

@ctw30002000 is that a book series or is it on KZfaq?

@ctw30002000 2 ай бұрын

@@npc.no1 Oh, I didn't specify that. It is a book series.

@palious13 2 ай бұрын

I love those books.

@skyranger1366 Ай бұрын

The grik did nothing wrong.

@galbert117 2 ай бұрын

Realistically there is nothing at Trafalgar that could stop it. Its armor is too thick & the ships couldn't withstand its fire. And even if they SOMEHOW ran out of ammo, it could just ram every enemy ship in sight.

@alessiodecarolis 2 ай бұрын

This is surely the most one-sided fight on this videos' serie, it wouldn't be a battle, but an execution, a single 305 shell would've wrecked every ship of the line of those times. The Danton would've won single handed the battle, the only job for the french fleet would've been to rescue the (few) survivors.

@simplyaugis9864 Ай бұрын

Finally an answer to the question that has been bugging me for the last few years.

@kvproductions2581 Ай бұрын

This video is so hilariously random. The fact that it takes itself so seriously and even ends with a "dramatic narration" makes it even better Can't wait for "Could a Single Avro Vulcan Win the American Revolution?" next

@Manuelslayor Ай бұрын

I mean, what are they supposed to do? The maximum range of any one of those kanons would be considered close range to a ww1 Batelship. Efective canon range would be considered closer than point blank. Its also faster. They could not even shot at it. They would anoy it at most even if the could.

@cybertea2639 Ай бұрын

the danton could technically run them down and ram them since it was much faster and was... well... metal

@philcollinson328 2 ай бұрын

The chasm between Napoleonic ships and warships a century later is akin to the Red Baron in his Fokker triplane taking on a modern F-35...Wouldn't last long and the Baron would not have even seen what sent him to the next world. 🤣. I expect the next vid will be ''What if the USS Gerald R. Ford took a side during the Battle of Actium ?''

@ShadowDragon8685 Ай бұрын

An F-35's fire control radar might not actually be able to acquire Richtofen's Fokker as a target. Radars filter out _a lot_ of extraneous stuff, so they don't wind up locking onto a flock of birds of a kite or a tree.

@philcollinson328 Ай бұрын

But seriously ...An F-35 dedicated to hunting down a Fokker? That Fokker is a dead Fokker.

@ShadowDragon8685 Ай бұрын

@philcollinson328 oh, most *likely.* But the F-35 pilot is gonna have to do stuff his plane doesn't wanna do, like make gun runs, or maybe just buzz the Red Baron at Mach 2 in order to air-slap his plane apart.

@wallemahatma Ай бұрын

I guess, that dogfight between a fokker and a f-35 would end with no one harmed. The fokker is way too slow and manouverable to get caught by any modern AA weapon and the f-35 is way too fast to get hit by the two MG08/15.

@philcollinson328 Ай бұрын

I suspect the guys commenting before have a point however ...The Baron's Fokker made of wood and paper, flying slower than an unladen bumble bee, may not even register on an F-35's instruments....If they accidentally collided, the F-35 pilot may need to employ his windscreen wiper ...and would understand why his opponent, Richthofen, had been dubbed the ''Red Baron'' ...This was a wonderful debate...And my sincere thanks to the creator of the vid (it spawned many talking points to my surprise) as well as many interesting and valued thought provoking comments ...lots of fun.

@sensha5470 Ай бұрын

Let’s make this short: The monitor and merrimack shot eachother for three hours to zero effect and both went home. A battleship has more armor everywhere than both combined, plus absurd firepower. Yes. A single WW1 battleship could simultaneously fight every navy in the world at that time and it’s only concern would be ammo.

@chrisbeer5685 2 ай бұрын

Would've been more fun to pick either a more recent battle or a less advanced ship. This one wouldn't even be a contest.

@mbr5742 2 ай бұрын

Even HMS Warrior vs Danton would be one sided. Breech loading QF rifles and Harvey or Krupp armor are huge game changers. Even Dantons 75mm gun outrange Warriors main artillery. And Hail Of Fire works in that time period as shown by Japan vs Russia in 1905

@stevie6265 2 ай бұрын

Danton was in fact a semi-dreadnought. But in this case, probably the best you could use, what with its 8 main big gun turrets.

@Wolfen443 2 ай бұрын

A WWI battleship there?, that is too unfair for the British. I agree with others that early ironclads migh fit better.

@CMDRScotty Ай бұрын

I think a ship like the HMS Warrior built in 1860 would be a better ship to test against Napoleonic wars.

@wackyotter1235 Ай бұрын

Pitbull on Meth versus disabled Toddlers

@chauvettes Ай бұрын

I appreciate the what-if scenarios. Thanks for making these well done videos!

@jamesloder8652 Ай бұрын

This would have been much more interesting with an ironclad ship rather than a full on battleship

@JuergenGDB 2 ай бұрын

LOL without even watching... YES! The bloody Ball shot of the cannons would not even penetrate the thinnest of armor on a dreadnaught.

@nikolaideianov5092 Ай бұрын

its not even a dreadnaught and its still be very one sided

@juliusjrgasataya3118 2 ай бұрын

Honestly, the Ww1 battleship is overkill for the wooden ships, especially with how Admiral Nelson tries to cross the T.

@firestorm165 2 ай бұрын

Did I inspire this when I said you may as well sent in HMS Dreadnought in your Victory vs Vikings vid or is it pure coincidence? Btw if you're still taking requests I'd still like to see a modern infantry regiment taking on Gallipoli

@paulbegley1464 2 ай бұрын

Knowing the British, I would have to believe that they would just wait until night and sneak a group aboard the ship and take over and then use the ship against the French

@Manuelslayor Ай бұрын

Not likley. There is allways somone on watch on a ww1 batelship. A sail ship is also to big tho pull up to the side without anyone noticing.....even during night. The compliment of the sail ship is also to small. Probably around 1/8th.

@Briselance Ай бұрын

Take over? 😅 I... think not.

@seanbissett-powell5916 Ай бұрын

@@Manuelslayor The Danton had a crew of about 850. That's roughly the same as a first rate ship of the line, but with a far smaller complement of marines. Automation has it's advantages ! It didn't have radars or night vision aids (they hadn't been invented) so would actually be very vulnerable while moored up at night. Have a look at the actual history of Royal Navy cutting-out operations. There were hundreds of them, and they had it down to a fine art, to the point wherethey could usually take a ship with a boarding party about 20% of the size of the target's crew, and often under the noses of shore-based forts. The first thing the target ship would know was when their decks were suddenly swarming with Royal Marines and sailors - even having guard-boats out rarely worked as a defence.

@lordkfc1297 26 күн бұрын

@@seanbissett-powell5916 The Danton would have better small arms, they would also have sentries as mentioned before but most importantly they would have searchlights. So yeah, a big hard no to any British attempt at boarding it xD.

@theroyburnhamshow3944 Ай бұрын

Next video: What if the Danton was never present at the Battle Of Trafalgar?

@Neklar Ай бұрын

The 9.4 cm guns would be more than enough with one shot per ship.

@Lexi-vl5eh 2 ай бұрын

Love these videos. The time travel story is always interesting, and i learn real history.

@poil8351 2 ай бұрын

yes one salvo of shells the entire royal navy is flaming matchsticks. shells could be devastating just look at the bsttle of sinope in 1853 when the russians wiped out a turkish a turkish squadron.

@poil8351 2 ай бұрын

the rea question what if a ww1 German battleship arrived instead of a french one. a three way battle could be intresting especially if it travels to prussia.

@mbr5742 2 ай бұрын

The steam powered warship with rifled breach loading QF guns will simply stay out of range by staying up wind and fire aimed single shots of explosive rounds at the waterline. From her 75mm terciaries. The rounds will punch through the hulls before detonating so the first few hits will kill the majority of a wooden ships crew and likely cause fires

@rainbowflameproductions7121 Ай бұрын

Did this randomly come across my youtube feed? Yes. Do i like alternate history? Not really but some scenarios are interesting. Am I going to watch this? Yes, yes i am!

@Mika-ph6ku Ай бұрын

Little did Napoleon know, Britain was eventually going to isolate itself from continental Europe for no particular reason...

@pmpcpmpc4737 Күн бұрын

One problem for Danton could be that it would be equipped with armour piercing shells and the wood of the British ships might not activate them, thus failing to explode. The high-speed shells would still damage the wooden hulls, but the damage would be a fraction of what it would be had they exploded.

@pauliusiv6169 Ай бұрын

a ww1 dreadnought vs ships of the line... the dreadnought doesn't even have to fire it's guns to win, it can just simply ram every single ship of the line in half while the wooden ships can barely scratch the paint with their guns

@tomriley5790 Ай бұрын

A Danton would literally have looked like seeing a starship appear today..

@tcofield1967 2 ай бұрын

Danton was outdated when she hit the water since she was essentially an updated Pre-Dreadnought. Compared to what was already in the water from Great Britain at the time it would have been outclassed but compared to ships a Century earlier she would have been impervious to anything the British could have brought against her. She wouldn't have had to use speed or long range firepower since nothing then in the British Navy had any chance of penetrating the armor of even the lightest protected cruiser of the French Navy, much less the heavy armor of a pre-dreadnought. The Danton would close and rake every single British ship with her main, secondary and tertiary batteries. All would fire high explosive shells which would easily penetrate the wood sides of all of the ships. Even the smaller 3 and 1.5 inch anti destroyer defense weapons would be devastating to any sailing ship. The ships that didn't burn to the waterline right off the bat would be sitting ducks for the rest of the French/Spanish fleet coming in to finish them off. It would be a slaughter.

@matthewjones39 29 күн бұрын

“Could a single M1A2 defeat 10 men with PTRDs?”

@thesenate1844 Ай бұрын

This is the kind of alternate history I never knew I wanted.

@horationelson2440 Ай бұрын

Maybe something a bit more... In comprehension? I mean, a semi-dreadnought with large plates of Krupp style steel armor, and guns that could outrange the nelsonian era ships multiple times over, which don't even need to hit to cause catastrohic damage... Yeah, it's a given. I mean, it may even be better for Danton to get a near miss, than a direct hit, as a direct hit would likely not even set off the fuse on most of the heavy shells, causing them to travel through the hull, creating a large, localized swath of destruction. Which while bad enough... If say, a 12 inch round exploded in the water next to, or even worse, under a SoTL, it could likely just reduce the underwater hull to splinters, and maybe even set off the magazine. Say, instead... a SoTL vs... Monitor? Or... if Warrior could defeat the french fleet alone? Sure, those ships are still at a HUGE advantage, being steam powered, with thick (relatively) armor, and armed with large shell guns... but a small, laminated armor ironclad VS a full SoTL is at least more... reasonable. And, one large ironclad VS a fleet of 33 SoTLs I think is also reasonably stacked for an interesting conversation.

@kentr2424 2 ай бұрын

I should bloody well hope so!! The Royal Navy's wooden sailing ships of the time armed with muzzle-loading cannon firing solid shot would be like shooting BB's at an elephant!! The Danton could move independently of sea and wind, fired shells that exploded on contact or delayed penetrating from various sized guns, and if all else failed could easily ram the opposing sailing ships.

@philiphumphrey1548 Ай бұрын

The world war 1 battleship would have to be carrying the right sort of ammunition. Armour piercing shells for use against other dreadnoughts would be pretty useless against wooden battleships, they would probably go straight through without exploding leaving relatively small 12 inch holes. High explosive shells for use against small boats and destroyers would probably work a lot better.

@flaksight Ай бұрын

There was a scene in the manga "Zipang" where the most sophisticated American fleet mid-WW2 in the Pacific, had to fight a modern Aegis-equipped Kongo-class destroyer sent back in time, that aimed to protect the evacuation of the Aleutian islands. It was foggy, and the advanced diesel-powered ship weaved between the enemy fleet at such an alarming speed despite its damaged radar systems - its single 127mm deck gun made quick and short work of enemy ships up close, and even caused the fleet to engage each other's muzzle flashes. A recon pilot also caused a small fire on one of the US ships, which allowed the JDS Mirai to fire some missiles at the lit target, with minimal damage taken to itself throughout the battle. They later transmitted the locations of surviving crew to the rest of the US fleet for recovery. I found it entertaining enough to write something similar into the plot of the fantasy novel I'm writing, an unexpected yet decisive battle between a massive dwarven fleet of wooden steamships against something akin to a diesel-powered WW1-esque corvette - where my protagonist improvises a radical way to figure out the bearings of enemy smokestacks in the fog while defending herself from wyvern riders using her submachine gun.

@mikep490 Ай бұрын

That's silly requesting a battleship. A late 19th century Monitor, like the Arkansas, could disable most of the fleet. Even the relatively weak WWI Wickes class destroyer could have taken on the fleet by itself. Cruise by the fleet at 2000 meters, punch a few 4" rounds thru each Brit ship, while using the 3" AA gun to make things interesting on deck. Make a second pass to take care of those running away, then call in the French navy to pick up survivors.

@user-xh3lz9xt4l Ай бұрын

Admiral Collingwood also played a major part in Trafalgar

@heybeter6685 Ай бұрын

slight correction: the battle wasn't fought over the continental system, as it wasn't an official policy until 1806. napoleon was preparing an army to invade britain and villeneuve's fleet was supposed to come up from cadiz to boulogne to ferry him across the english channel, but villeneuve ignored his orders several times and was caught off trafalgar by nelson, who had been blockading him for weeks before he decided to hastily leave port.

@georgepopescu1327 4 күн бұрын

It's like having a Tiger 2 in a medieval battle. There was no way to stop it for a medieval army, the gunner would have shot thousands of soldiers before they could even get close.

@dramaking9559 2 ай бұрын

Love these Scenerios and even if they're one sided thats my kind of entertainment. I had a scenerio in mind. Napoleon returns from Elba with his 870 men but they only have baisc late 1800 and early 1900s technology. No planes, No tanks, no ships. just bolt action rifles, Basic artillery, and machine guns of the late 1800s and early 1900s. Only his 870 men (The soilders that went to exile with him) can have these new technologies. When he gets to the battle of waterloo or any other early battle his other armies can only use their era appropriate weapon. Would Napoleon be able to use the Quality and force the Coalition to let him stay in France or would the sheer qunitity in numbers of the Coalition send him back to Exile? Lets just say when in Exile, Napoleon gets a Console command research cheat technology or Elba becomes a modern early 1900 modern nation idk

@jeremygair4007 2 ай бұрын

At point blank range even the muzzle shockwaves would devastating. That metal behemoth is shrugging everything off the British sent. It could choose to remain at range and never be threatened by Nelson's guns. Imagine it shelling London

@Dare_To_Game 2 ай бұрын

Would love to be a fly on Admiral Nelson's Wall for that turn of events.

@richierich8555 Ай бұрын

You got me. The stated premise is so absurd and obvious that I just had to watch your video.

@marvindebot3264 29 күн бұрын

The Danton's 9 and 12-inch guns had a range of at least 6 times the effective range of the cannon of the day. She could have sat with just her fighting tops visible over the horizon and reduced the fleet to matchwood. The two are at opposite ends of the period with the fastest change in sea warfare. We went from ships of the line to ironclads and then to dreadnoughts in around 50 years (1859 to 1906).

@SnowPIEZ Ай бұрын

Some suggestions for the series: 1) USS Nimitz during the Attack on Pearl Harbor (Based on the Final Countdown) 2) A battalion of 1,100 soldiers from the Imperial Japanese Army assisting the remaining 500 members from the Satsuma Domain in the Battle of Shiroyama against 30,000 soldiers 3) Two companies (One American and one British) of light infantry accompanied by at least two M1 Abrams and two Challenger 2 tanks assisting in Operation Market Garden 4) 5 F-16 Fighting Falcons or 5 F-35A Lighting IIs from the Hellenic Air Force in the Battle of Crete, tasked with assisting the island defenders from the Germans 5) A platoon of 50 light infantry squads from the PLA in the Battle of Peking assisting the Qing Dynasty and Boxer movement against Eight-Nation Alliance 6) 50 US Navy SEALs or DEVGRU in the Battle of Wake Island. All of them are armed with the group's equipment as well as underwater equipment, allowing them to swim and plant explosives at unsuspecting IJA ships. 7) At least 100 LAPD or NYPD SWAT and police officers in the Battle of Atlanta defending the city from the Union 8) The Ladny and Pytlivyy in the Battle of Tsushima, assisting the Russian Empire against the Empire of Japan 9) 100 American-equipped South Koreans (Accompanied by one or two M4 Shermans) from the Korean War assisting the Sambyeolcho army in the Sambyeolcho Rebellion against the Yuan Dynasty

@jdotoz 16 күн бұрын

The SEALs would get annihilated. In conventional battle they're just exceptionally fit infantry, and there just wasn't enough island for them to really practice their specialty.

@xgford94 Ай бұрын

A Fletcher class with extra 5” shell stored in any place they fit and as the man said “ Game over, man game over”

@Sshooter444 Ай бұрын

Is this a real question? It wouldn't even need to fire a shot!

@Shanks9001_ Ай бұрын

I think a more “even” battle would be could the four Iowa classes win the battle of Jutland. I think it would be good to have a scenario for if it was on either side.

@jixdl Ай бұрын

okay... but how would Graff Spee's East Asia squadron fare? or any other ww1 "weaker" force/squadron do

@EA-History Ай бұрын

Ships may be one thing, but the crew and its training and morale is another major factor, as it was in the original battle of Trafalgar. As a what-if scenario, I think it's not that interesting, because it goes beyond every possible realistic scenario. obviously placing a ww1 era battleship, an experienced elite crew and a master tactition would mean that every factor and traits the french actually DID have is turned upside down. The original battle was a close call, the french morale and skills somewhat lacking compared to the british, was likely a deciding factor.

@thekitchencounterauthor Ай бұрын

This reminds me of one of Harry Harrison's Stainless Steel Rat novels, although that simply involved equipping Napoleon with recoilless artillery pieces.

@nateharder2286 Ай бұрын

I think it's less weather or not the Danton wins and more who the danton would side with, if at all.

@stargatefan10 2 ай бұрын

In a situation like this, i imagine, it would just drive through the enemy ships.

@iimcrandomgamer711 Ай бұрын

Bro is creating scenario from isekai novel JAPAN SUMMON.

@panzerwolf494 Ай бұрын

I imagine it would go something like the CSS Virginia during the first day of battle at Hampton Roads. The British, no matter how many guns they had, would simply bounce off the hull, if the battleship even let them get close enough to do anything. At the same time imagine the reversal of opinion it would give Napoleon from his dismissal of steam power

@bishopcorva Ай бұрын

It may be more of a case of 'not enough ship to set the shells off' like, the Danton was built to fight other steel hull ships, so it's shells were fused accordingly to be able to punch through so many inches of steel before exploding or just punch through period. Firing those at wood, might just be like a ice-pick through paper kind of thing. shell hits, punches clean through both sides and skips across the water on the far side. At least for he main armament. The smaller guns though, those would be where the real work is done since they're more for hitting thinner plate around the secondary gun batteries of other ships, super structure ad thinner armored pieces. Plus raking with the AA guns which would still be easily inside their maximum even with the brit ships of the line being at their absolute maximum accuracy range. Never mind speed of the Danton plus it can just go one direction an turn back, swivel guns and not need to steer the entire ship to line up shots or wait for the roll of waves. Yeah, it wold be devastating for Nealson, the world in that time for such a ship to exist because France might just move positions and decide that it should rule the waves.

@dimesonhiseyes9134 Ай бұрын

One shell from the 12" gun, if it actually exploded inside one of the ships, would either sink or cripple just about anything floating at the time of the battle. The secondary batteries could sink anything in just a few salvos. Even the AA guns could sink or disable a ship of the line in fairly short order. All of this happening well out of range of any return fire. Its insane to rhink About.

@king_br0k Ай бұрын

5:42 sailing ships are only limited in range by food and other supplies, while steam powered ships need fuel, leading to sailing ships generally having longer range and endurance, but at a lower speed

@rorritomoromichea6484 Ай бұрын

Parry This, I have an idea for a confrontation of past versus future, the Black Horsemen (German Mercenaries) of 1632, in the Battle of Nancy in 1477, supporting the Duke of Burgundy Charles the Bold and making use of his key pistols wheel to confront the Swiss pikemen who defeated the Burgundian knights

@goodbodha Ай бұрын

Id actually go a step further and say that a single ww1 cruiser could win vs both fleets. Guns with much more range, accuracy, and power would decimate those wooden ships. The cruiser could easily keep the range where it wanted and then essentially idle for maximum accuracy. A better question would be could the combined fleets escape by running in every direction? Outside of running they dont stand a chance.

@nikobellic5198 2 ай бұрын

A battleship may be overkill, but it is nonetheless an interesting scenario to consider.

@DanielMatthews-ql3wf 2 ай бұрын

By it self without any fleet a single iron clad of even the kind used in the American Civil War would have gone through either wooden fleet like sailing threw paper.

@nickklavdianos5136 Ай бұрын

No one wouldn't. They're too small, not seaworthy enough, they aren't particularly fast and one is not enough.

@kenken8857 Ай бұрын

Before the first famous battle with the monitor the Merrymac sank several ships of the line. The cannon balls just bounced off.

@nickklavdianos5136 Ай бұрын

@@kenken8857 they were not ships of the line. They were frigates, corvettes and gunboats. Please get your information right.

@DeutzFarmer96 2 ай бұрын

I feel like crossing the T would be particularly bad tactics in this scenario.

@hstafford078 Ай бұрын

Setting aside the firepower difference, the simple ability to steer and move without having to rely on wind and sail would be a huge advantage.

@vulgar_potato4992 2 ай бұрын

Haven’t watched video yet, but do the ships of the line get in for a boarding action?

@poil8351 2 ай бұрын

the french would have rifles and side arms on board no doubt.

@alessiodecarolis 2 ай бұрын

Plus, the LMGs and rifles of the marines on board would make short work of every enemy .

@richierich8555 Ай бұрын

I remember a "what if" scenario on Saturday Night Live where it was asked if Napoleon could have won the Battle of Waterloo if he had a B52 loaded with nuclear weapons. Dan Akeroyd gave a very funny monologue to the positive. This reminds me of that.

@user-dw1cz9he1w Ай бұрын

It’s pretty wild how much the tech improved in just about a century. Similarly, the WWI battleship would be just about as vulnerable to current tech. 200 years of serious advancements way beyond the development for 2000 years before it.

@scollyb 20 күн бұрын

You are seriously underestimating the missmatch here. A single shell from the 12 guns weighs almost as much as Victory's broadside and has far more energy. If the wooden hull was enough to set off the impact fuse one or two hits is all its going to take. If they pass straight through then Danton would manoeuvre to the bow or stern and send the shot down the length of the ship. Utterly devastating everything along the length The 32lb cannon on the sailing ships would literally just bounce off Danton. It would be like firing 9mm at a modern tank. They aren't focusing fire, or manoeuvring in or out of range. They are shooting fish in a barrel It's like bringing an M1 Abrams to fight 27 WW1 tanks

@plymouth5714 29 күн бұрын

It was always maintained that HMS Warrior, long before the WW1 Dreadnoughts could run down and destroy an entire squadron of enemy sail on her own so any WW1 Battleship with revolving turrets could definitely do it (only much quicker)!

@DeusExAstra 21 сағат бұрын

Now do a WWI tank vs an F-22 Raptor carrying a nuclear tipped missile.

@desubtilizer Ай бұрын

Some pre WWI warships still around today that could still do some serious damage to the wooden ships - USS Texas, Mikasa (encased in concrete), USS Olympia, Georgios Averof and the Aurora. HMS Caroline is the sole survivor of the battle of Jutland built in 1914 and still exists today.

@edwardblair4096 Ай бұрын

How many shells does the French battleship have on board? Amunition supply is often the key component when considering unbalanced technology scenarios. If, for instance, the battleship only has enough ammo for one hour of sustsined fighting, but the battle lasts for 3-5 hours, then the question is whether it can do enough damage while still effective to change the outcome. Also, are we assuming that the rest of the French-Spanish fleet has been briefed on what to expect, or maybe done any joint drills? Or will their suprise be just as much as the British suprise?

@kyle18934 Ай бұрын

when one main gun is made with more metal than all the metal on the fleet... i think the battle would be one sided lol

@Herdatec Ай бұрын

This can be summarized by one word "Dreadnought". These line of ships were such a step up from the old wooden ships, that they could already beat everything else on the ocean. They drove faster, could shoot further and handle more punishment. The difference was already ridiculous in 1906 can't imagine what sheer destruction these would do a few hundred years earlier.

@Herdatec Ай бұрын

BTW the Danton is a Pre-Dreadnought design.

@xenotypos 4 күн бұрын

Regarding the consequences you missed the point, you didn't check why Napoleon did the continental system (long after Trafalgar): it was because he could not invade Britain to begin with. It was his only way to damage Britain. If he had even a temporary naval dominance around Europe, his plan was to invade Britain, and to force a favorable peace like he did with Austria and Prussia. He wouldn't need the continental blockade (which damaged the economies of Europe too). So the question after winning Trafalgar is: would he be able to invade despite the supply issues of a maritime frontier? Taking London would probably be enough to force such a peace, but it remains unsure how far the British were willing to take this.

@pavelkoudelka8934 Ай бұрын

Why keep your distance? We saw a similar but less extreme scenario when the first ironclads came on the scene... When the Merrimack attacked the wooden ships of the northerners guarding the blockade, completely demolishing them... Add another 50 years of advances in propulsion, guns and armor and you have an absurd combination :D Danton could destroy them even without using ammunition, and the HE ammunition on board would turn wooden ships into splinters very quickly :D imagine a hit with a 305 mm gun :D from HMS Victory, after a single hit, there would be nothing but splinters left.. .I understand that it was a request from the audience, but here it would be like running into the Roman legions with a machine gun...

@alexbenis4726 Ай бұрын

That painting at 1:26 is beautiful.

@Nitedawg1 Ай бұрын

This could have been interesting if : you had only the battleship on French side, gave info on how much ammo the BB had vs # of British ships, using AP vs HE targeted where on each ship, and what to do when heavy ammo ran out (aa guns, machine guns, ramming, boarding with modern firearm if necessary)

@pbr4814 3 сағат бұрын

Just about ANY WW1 ship class could have significantly altered the course of this battle simply by pounding the enemy ships from point-blank range. The guns of the ships of the line had an abysmal range.