It really is. It's amazing what helping rebuild a defeated country can do to relations instead of pillaging every country under your control like Russia did

@@titan1639 SJWs will hate you for saying that. But joked aside, yeah, your right.

I am from Balkans and ay surly nou wat wars mins in her pure sans i am praud Serbian old land who bigans on 10 sentury bc. And older and how i get toted its in wars sens den.

@@stefanmilosevic2162 I get you’re Serbian and not an English major in university but oh my god I don’t think anyone can read this

no they're just biding their time for when they can get revenge

And uncle sam.

Hahahahaha... and Mazinger Z

What about their Gundmans?

Japan, South Korea, İndonesia VS China (no buy weapon)

@Sean Yee lndonesia is 16th strongest country in the world

For self defence of course

@@Gamer_field for attacking china

@@arthureast3912 Well, they deserve it.

@@arthureast3912 the self-defensive offensive

@@arthureast3912 It’s legit in there constitution that they can’t declare war. The only way Japan would fight is if China attacked them first

They have Saitama

@@tobolits383 A hero for fun 😅

@@user-us4hl3zr2b Mecha Godzilla ruled back when I was a kid in the early 1980s watching english dubbed Godzilla movies I’m still a fan all these years later and I say Mecha Godzilla can take anything down that isn’t of course Godzilla himself.

@@keithwhisman true

Facts.

Korean War V2

@@appa609 I guess an interesting question would be what the DPRK might do if China goes to war against the U.S. They may view it as the chance of a lifetime to reunify the peninsula, and launch an attack on the South knowing China will help once they encounter difficulties.

@@soyusmaximus7176 most of the north would surrender, just to get fed. Read how good SK soldiers were in Vietnam.

Kim Jong un: hold my nukes please..

@felix mendez state your sources of these facts because i highly doubt what your saying is true.

felix mendez first of all just write america you aren‘t 12 to write the whole time and secound of all pointing out the debt doesn‘t change much because the moment you go to war national debt will be set to 0 and the armed forces get unlimited funding. If you want to point out the weakness of the united states just point out the technological gap between russia or china against the US in hypersonic missile technology and the specilalisation of the US army in asymetrric warfare. And don‘t be so aggressive it‘s just a youtube video

@felix mendez You still don't understand war economies. Just look up how debt is handled when there is a major war

pahalavan100 don’t pay attention to this moron lol. He’s just a salty anti-American shill

@@SergeantKillGore He sounds like an Antifa Soyboy.

and Gundams

Isn't godzilla the one attacking japan?

You mean Gojira, for maximum weeb points.

Don't forget their giant Mecha Suits.

I would like to remind you this is just a made up scenario and the rules state no allies would be allowed to join in this said scenario

Right On

@@mixtape9123 😂 made up rules or not,, we Brits love a scrap..

Sarah u what makes back bone my choice kings

Love all extra yelling

Reminds me my uncle

I loved that Marine who is your icon.

I was on Marine bases helping them out for years in Africa and Iraq. Love the Marines. The army would hunker down when the shells came in. The marines went hunting. Needless to say. They started leaving the Marines alone as much as the could. They feared them.

That made sense when it was 1v1. But this is not. Why is Korea neutral but Japan isn't arbitrarily. A more realistic war with realistic allies will make a better video.

Now you tell me!!!!

@@anthonydefilippo8526 because the reality is the us military is a behemoth and its naval and air power cannot be challenged 1 on 1 by a single country

Ang kailangan ay magisip ng malaliman kung paan0 mapadali. Matal0 ang Russia. Malagay sila ng missiles sa ilalim ng lupa sa ilalim ng dagat defection Pin copied text snippets to stop them expiring after 1 hour

At sa nasa at bibigyan nila ng warning ang mga it0.. Kapag nagmatigas yung at0mic na ginawa nila n00ng w0rldww2 apat na. D0bli para. Mapasuk0 ang Russia at china. Buburahin nila ang kalahati. Nit0 para humina ang pwersa ng. Mga it0.. It0 nakaplan0. Ng us.

Get popcorn and alcohol, take a shot for every conspiracy comment

Ah, I found the American seating. Time to sit back and slap some ass.

USA IS BAD COUNTRY WHILE CHINA AND RUSSIA GOOD. Now give me good boy points or I black mail you.

@@echidnanatsuki882 Fact

cApItaLisM iS tHe wORsT sYsTem, cHiNa wIn eAsy

agreed

So thorough. I enjoyed reading that.

Yep I don't want to be that guy but the amount of time the United States has had in active combat is crazy. The armed forces were designed to fight unconventional warfare the whole time they were on the offensive. In this case it would be a counter attack/ defence it would be a blood bath they would know exactly what to do to slow down the reds if not stop them completely. They have been fighting it this whole time imagine the what would happen if they were on the other side. The United States is a hardened veteran when I comes to experience in combat. It may be a different war but the senior leaders know what to expect when bullets start flying and shit goes crazy. Russian has a little bit of experience but China has none. It would be a blood bath for the sheer experience alone as well as American knowledge would be past off to the Japanese armed forces and thats it.

@@Jakezillagfw America would totally surprise them in what it would actually do. No one even would guess the strategy until it happens. The lethality and ferocity of it will shock everyone. 1/3 of the world dead in a all out war with The United States against (who?)

Three words: *Shock And Awe*

好莱坞看多了吧，你们可以派出钢铁侠横扫中国。还一天。这么厉害，怎么还和中国谈判？自己不觉得可笑吗？

That nation attacked Vietnam after war with US and lost xD

@@deniscare112 he is talking about naval warfare not ground

@@junjin3033 china is not that guy

Is that true, or you just fking around?

Now imagine how Japan is gonna surrender once the OCS is declared military alliance

Japan is not an empire any more it's as weak as little Britain when it lost it empire

@@princecharming4708 Its the third largest economy in the world

@@princecharming4708 Japan has a military you fool. And Japan is one of them most advanced by far they are ahead of most. You can compare Japanese inocations with European and American. Thing is the Japanese military can only be defensive hence why they USA is stationed there. It's more a reminder for Japan to honor the agreement they will always be defensive.

@@tylerrobbins8311 actually japan is in decline and has been since the 90s with a debt twice its gdp and a population that is shrinking to 80 million by 2050 its hardly got a bright future and will most likely get gobbled up by china in the next few years and be turned communist like the USA when it collapses and china becomes number 1

I'm sure his last video will be a WW3 one.

And Mothdra.

And one punch man

Godzilla, Mothra, National Kid, Naruto and the Power Rangers. Nobody in the whole planet Earth would beat Japan. They have Sushi missiles and Sashimi drones.

J C sure sure

Yeah right. Anime and manga. Sure. More like protecting hentai. Lol.

@@karlobatiao4398 and there will be no bigger glory than dying while protecting hentai tbh

and Nintendo Sony jo1(jpop )

Ah, a fellow man of culture, I see.

it would be a very one sided conflict in favor of japan

@@DarkKnight52365 so was the first one

The U.S. invaded N.Korea , Vietnam , Iraq and Afghanistan and what were the final results ??.....what is the exit strategy ? ....was the cost of blood and treasure worth it ?....it's cheaper to live in peace , something America doesn't ever learn.

not wrong about that.

@Maurice Clemons No. There are Seamen from several other countries aboard.

@@leesenger3094 yiaks

Forward to 2021. SOmeone needs to remind Binkov, if US cant even defeat a few Taliban soldiers with outdated AK 47 running on sandals, what makes you think the US can defeat China and Russia COMBINED? lol. Sorry, but this is a the minimum, laughable.

@@leesenger3094 yikes

So basically... The usual moment when people forget that the scenario has rules it sticks to.

@@massineben7198 Pretty much...

Some people think the army can magically transport to half a world away in seconds.

Doesn't matter. Red still lose.

TheLastCasualty ...Yeah but as soon as 🇺🇸 gets attacked or goes to war, article 5 of NATO gets applied and that states.....(not word for word but here’s the synopsis)...if any NATO nation is attacked or goes to war, the organization as a whole responds with a coalition. That’s why it’s never just 🇺🇸 vs whomever and that’s the advantage of having NATO.

But the US paid a heavy price for all this. Thousands of young Americans in graveyards around the world.

You got a point bro.

The Chinese are very efficient...I wouldn't underestimate them

@@anthonyw9129 I mean the fact is that the Chinese military does not have combat experience while the U.S does, so that would likely be a factor in some way

Rule number one of war never understood estimate your opponent.

.i can't wait to read all of the comments from...."experts" with no training and no experience and majority, lacking even any military service at all, explain how which militaries are better than the other and explain why and explain exactly how each aircraft performs(because they use flight Sim video games which makes them real pilots) also, Call of Duty video game players explaining how to fight fight ground war and how to use logistics during during a war. Lol Always a ton of these types of people in the comment sections of videos like this.

@@nexpro6118 t. China shill

If this war happened, u guys can only find China and Russia in ur history book. Sry? Did u ask me how about the US? It's polishing shoes for the new world leader(Europe).

@@variousbeans5043 lmao funny you said Europe

This video is just a "simulation" using a Risk table game. Not actual real-life accuracy stuff at all.

Peter Rose Reconquista time!

I second this Morocco and Spain have a long history . Those guys even took all of the Iberian Peninsula once !

China and Russia's nukes vs. America's nukes ......who would win ????

@Massimo Hack What happens if the conflict escalates and one side decides a first nuclear strike is their best option ???

Both China and Russia each can take out all US satellites at the beginning of the war as well. Can US fight without sateligtes?

@@zlong598 -- Russia, MAYBE, has that capability. Not China. And yes, it can. The US has numerous redundancy features.

Don't forget about the Philippines as well! While in theory not a huge military super power, they could provide huge support in the war.

@@alexspillman9192 on point.

Australia is bound by a defence we would definitely be there too ....

@@alexspillman9192 Some nukes will send you back to your place

@@Daniel23424 China and russia would get nuked too then

I think he underestimates the US, Binkov often depicts wars as being trades in numbers. When in reality, modern battles are so sophisticated that past a certain point, battles turn into snowballs. The US military is expressly designed to seize the initiative as quickly as possible.

@@MadM0nte yes. His videos are more Quantitative over Qualitative.

@@MadM0nte the tech at this point isn't even fair and they haven't seen even 10% of what's going on.

@@grubbybum3614 agreed. It gives you a very raw, broad picture, without accounting for that X that often makes or breaks victory on the modern battlefield.

Japan is armed, they have a kick ass military but they are unable to declare war due to WW2 treaties.

Similarly, Japan will kick American power out of its territory. Which country doesn't want to be independent?

@@softdrink-0 I was under the impression that Japan has a more defensive military, but Japan PM was pushing for their parliament to look to start focusing on having a more offensive military due to CCP actions in the North China sea.

@@user-ss3og3qx7e Do you remember what happened last time Japan went against the US?

@@user-ss3og3qx7e Not with Chicoms breathing down their neck.

My (Okinawan) great-grandparents lost many of their brothers & sisters in the war, I would never want that to happen again.

If this war were to happen other allies would join the US such as Britain, France and Australia.

Said Ali China and Russia are literally doing the exact same thing at this moment America is the only thing keeping them from taking whatever they want

Can't squash Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq armies though... And these countries are not even a superpower, nor technological, numerically and industrially capable nor superior. Either way, this is a hypothetical scenario.

Omae wa Ima shindeiru yo actually most of those countries were squashed. The Iraq military was one of the worlds largest and it was swept aside in weeks. Defeating a countries armed forces and fighting an insurgency are not the same

True, one note though, I woudnt realy count the bases in Turkey as they tend to refuse their use whenever the hell they like.

Hey there mankov! Russians askander misiles are 1,500 miles! Plus there 10s of new hyper sonic maneuverable misiles that Flies and directed in unpredictable directions. And controllable of their direction flying over 10 Hmong speed which impossible to overtake sore in the first six months the Americans will lose all their Airplane carrier ships and that’s the first thing Russia will do. And it might take a month or two. Six months like I said in the beginning. It’s if the USA will keep them on land parked somewhere hidden. Times has changed. Ship carriers Is not a weapon against Russia no more. Even without nukes. Hard work,and team work pays of. Unless they kill Putin the world will become a much more peaceful place. Because Russia always wanted peace and fairness. Who said the Americans will be dictating the world what to do. Will watch and see.

There only one real leader now in the world. And it Putin. No more Churchill or leaders like him

@@shonbatista9118 how much of that tech is real and how much is vapor ware? Also of the tech that is real, how much of it can Russia afford to make? If Putin is the hope of the world, I’m rooting for the comet!

I’m sure India would also join the U.S and it’s allies 🇮🇳

@@TheLoNeDarkWolf999 I'm not it would be hell especially logistically, I'm not sure how well the Indian army could do with massive troop movements in extremely remote areas with poor logistics. Not mention the fact if they did Pakistan would 100% get involved and you know nukes would be exchanged. I think they would sit it out

@@thecommunistdoggo1008 Well India won't join until Pakistan joins the fight. Jai Hind Jai Bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

I still dont understand why he does that and puts that much effort in silly videos

辛辣球Bitter Balls Yea me neither.

As a Korean, we will be very engaged . Ppl forget that there are huge American bases in S. Korea.

That is a pretty good advantage but what if the us got hit by a emp missile ?

@@generalboyit7867 EMP's of any relevant size, as you know, can only be delivered through the high-altitude detonation of thermonuclear weapons. Likely multiple. Such launches would be just as disruptive to friendly forces as they would to enemy, rendering this option only suitable for defensive use as part of a retreat. More importantly such a launch would be indistinguishable from the offensive launch of ICBMs in a nuclear attack, and due to the short decision loop in nuclear warfare almost certainly trigger a nuclear response. Imagine being the President of the US and hearing that after RU/CN ICBMs were launched all contact with US forces on the Island of Japan was lost. You have 30 minutes to make a decision. What would you do?

​@yehoutube That's not a compelling argument, those wars were fought decades ago under very different win/loss conditions and for very different objectives. We're talking here about a primarily naval and air war centered around the ability to competently launch air strikes into non-permissible air space. This is something the US Military is highly specialized to achieve being primarily offensive focused. Vietnam and the Korean War were hampered from achieving their objectives due to the political reality of the time. For example, the US President Harry S. Truman (being generally incompetent) believed that an invasion of China to destroy the forces amassing at the border would lead to open hostilities between the US and USSR. Truman would refrain from risking Europe at all costs, thus his tepid policy in Asia. As for Vietnam the overwhelming reality acknowledged by all sides was that the US could take Hanoi at any moment. Despite the extensive Russian SAM defenses, during the Nixon administration large scale bombing raids into North Vietnam were not prevented. Nor were they preventable frankly. The mismanagement of the war (which shouldn't have even started by the way) is expressly acknowledged as the fault of the Johnson administration and its inability to determine win conditions for the war beyond propping up the SV puppet government. This meant that for the majority of these conflicts the US forces were deprived of the initiative by their own government. In the conventional conflict Binkov presents the neither of the problematic political conditions from Vietnam and North Korea exist, as nuclear weapons are not modeled. Thus, the superior C&C of the US gives American forces a shorter decision making loop and as a consequence, the initiative.

We already know who won that lol

And our 12!

9&3! Lol

Hopefully our government in New Zealand will be voted out next election and National will be voted in. When that happens we should strengthen our alliance with Australia and USA. 🇳🇿🇭🇲🇺🇸

USA the rag of the weaknesses of NATO alliance will disappear in a few years the wicked weakness of the USA cannot fight one-on-one with Russia cowards USA NATO jerseys

@@user-ny3wv9yx3h Bring it ON Rusky kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mM5jdNaTqM7SkZ8.html

Yes I don't think many people consider how complicated things like this could be. (Hypothetical scenario:) We just spent ten minutes talking about two countries military capabilities, or about 5 minutes for one. Nearly every single criticism you have would involve about three more countries, opening more possibilities and more countries and we'd spend more time talking about these countries than the actual subject. I also see things like logistics and economy being thrown around. Do you want this video to be 34 hours long? If you want to hear about every aspect about a hypothetical war then go read Red Storm Rising or something but I am grateful for what they've done so far already is some of the most detailed and considerate work I've seen. But seriously go read Red Storm Rising.

Forward to 2021. SOmeone needs to remind Binkov, if US cant even defeat a few Taliban soldiers with outdated AK 47 running on sandals, what makes you think the US can defeat China and Russia COMBINED? lol. Sorry, but this is a the minimum, laughable.

@@fredh8065 I disagree with this. China and Russia are countries that fight in conventional warfare. The US dominates conventional warfare. But the Taliban is an uncoventionalist fighter. The US is not very good at that. Just look at Vietnam.

@@fredh8065 Guerrilla warfare and conventional warfare are two different situations.

India is neutral

Shabdik Acharyya Hen a world war starts alot of things can change, i think there is a chance of it escalating the Kashmir Conflict, the Israel-Palestine Conflict, and US-Iranian tensions, because without the spotlight, nations will do some strange things, and also i was basing the hypothetical war, off territorial disputes, so i hope you understand why I included India.

Not to mention that India has been growing out of it's Non-aligned Movement past. It's becoming abundantly clear that India, Vietnam, the US and Japan all have common security concerns, and India is engaging them to China's chagrin.

@@shabdikacharyya2516 Unless the conflict starts as a war between India and Pakistan, then the other countries pick sides. Israel is the country I'd leave out, the US would actually tell they to stay out since though they have a strong defensive capabilities, their power projection is extremely limited, meaning they wouldn't be of much use, and them joining up would just cause political problems with the Arab states. However, the Persian Gulf states (sans Iran) would definitely be on the US side. I could see a war between India and Pakistan escalating if China joins with Pakistan, then the US responds, dragging Japan into the war against China. Then Russia joining with China, bringing NATO into the war. Kind of a repeat of the geopolitics of WWI, just with different players.

Too bad it ain't real

Lol

That would mean angering other countries by depriving them of trade with China.

@@ddaazahh8064 Very true, but that is to be expected during war. And then there is the often ignored, at least by the typical person discussing hypothetical wars, reasons for the hypothetical war. The simple fact is that a shooting war between teh US and China woul dresult in a global recession, if not an out right depression.

The US would cripple China's economy. Making it more difficult to build more military assets, what ever that might be. China would be in debt like America is lol

@@elleneim7638 In other posts, I have said exactly that. Crippling the economy is less costly than a direct confrontation in Chinses home waters where they have the advantage of landbasd air, missiles, and sensors.

As they say, amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics. Logistically, China is in a hopeless situation. They would be out of oil in a few months, out of food in the same. More locally, their troops on the Ryuku islands would have to bring everything they need when they first land, because they would not get anything more.

Exactly…The bat eaters would run out of fuel and food within 90 days.

Block the Strait of Malacca and China dies very quickly. If Russia is in the war they can't split their oil reserves. China surrenders after a while and Russia can't fight a two front war with all of the US's allies.

@@mjgasiecki Relying on allies is kinda risky considering the cause or context of the conflict may actually influence whether they pull through. Heck we r seeing this with Ukrain where some allies are cool with appeasing Russia to end the conflict at the expense of Ukraine. Human nature

id like to see that, but that would not be a small undertaking. We would probably not see another video for almost a year then.

YESS

Nah.. we like it if happens to us

Also, those 19 Japanese submarines are some of the most advanced conventional subs in the world. They are not mediocre 17:41

@@user-db9lz2yl7i all china had to march on your soil with its huge population and pee on your land... u guys will be flooded.

terrible performance? my dear friend. Russia could wipe out from the world map Ukraine if Putin wants, but that's not the target.

Dude they not trying to destroy Ukraine they trying to take it over not level it.

@@keysersoze1537 don’t be silly, their strategy of taking over wasn’t working so they’ve moved to leveling cities like Mariupol.

@@keysersoze1537 still. Terrible job even at that. russia is nothing compared to a even passive europe. In a couple of years Europe alone would dwarfe russias military and other capabilities. Together with the US, Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea russia and china would face nothing but destruction.

I'm a Chinese American US citizen, I definitely agree that China is corrupt, but PLN is growing very quickly, and have a much smaller area to worry about, so they might be able to remove America temporarily.

@yohoutube, the US military does not rely on "China's supply", you confuse US consumers and enterprise with the armed forces. The USA still dominates as the world leader in ship-building, aircraft design & manufacture, missiles & space, land warfare, eWar, nuclear and small arms development. All areas where China is behind. The US is even energy independent now. In a hot war, the US is better equipped, prepared & trained as well as experienced in fighting multi-Theater conflicts.

@@user-db9lz2yl7i "Hey, bro, don't be so brainwashed! Think for yourself!" *Proceeds to intake hours of media for his entire life per day which tells him anything left of taxes is communism or socialism*

@@user-db9lz2yl7i "Critical thinking and analyzing" Sure

Im chinese and i've never been so disrespected with something i actually 100% agree with

Ay what the heck is happening in the reply section guys? Chill out(冷靜)

You missed out the UK and france

That would be super juicy

This video actually explains most of that war.

And of course China will not do anything? All invading forces will be destroyed. First to be destroyed by hypersonic missiles will be the US bases in Okinawa, Guam and Japan.

@@itch4travel missiles with conventional warheads really don’t do much to a large island. And the entire Chinese invasion fleet will likely be sunk by US nuclear submarines. You simply can’t do a naval invasion when you have no sea control.

Glad you spelled out the details. That one point over Okinawa felt wrong, but thanks for the more precise details.

Bwahahaha!

I honestly feel like Russia likes the US more than China.

In fact China is pressing on Russia to return Vladivostok to them

Miniature Ben actually China with its billion plus population has been eyeing the vast empty Siberian forest for ages as well as Vladivostok. The Russians know this. They are not stupid. Their frontier borders are with China not USA. Their history is one of being continually invaded by the Mongols, the tartars, the Fins, the Turks, Napoleon, Hitler etc etc. they are leery of China so that realistically I do not see them supporting a Chinese invasion of Japan. I think they would give lip service but mobilize in the event of an attempted Chinesr takeover of Siberia

Oh this aged very well. They conducted numerous joint military exercises in the past months

China was in a civil war in the middle of a World war. The Soviets were still the enemy but Germany was a bigger threat. Also the Soviets didn't help the US against Japan as much as some reformists believe. Thank you.

@@Predator42ID Yeah, the Soviets and Communist Chinese didn't do shit in the Pacific Front. It was the US and Nationalist Chinese that fought the bulk of that war.

@seth Thomas You are wrong. There were japan forces fighting with the Soviets but nothing big - they were concentrated on the big battle with Germany. After Berlin ... japan was doomed. Do not get me wrong US did the big hits there.

@@Predator42ID Yes, the Kuomintang and Americans did the bulk of the fighting, but the Soviets did liberate Manchukuo (Manchuria).

and you still lost to goat farmers and rice farmers 😹👎🏼

@@mrmacias4217 so did the Russians lol

Probably not Russia. China, yes. Russia has been fighting behind the scenes all over the east. Plus they still remember Afghanistan.

@@mattiOTX lmao yeah they got ducked up in Afghanistan but also people forget that we haven’t been fighting actual country’s with government and borders we are fighting beliefs and ideologies you can’t kill that with bullets

@Lion Pro this isn’t even ground though this is mainly naval combat

Good call

Yeah, would be incredibly stupid to fight a ground war with a nation who could, conceivably, field an army larger than our whole population.

In the real world, that would have far greater consequences, as the Chinese would undoubtedly invade the Korean peninsula, knowing that they're pretty much unopposed and the US presence in South Korea is their most immediate threat. That would REALLY piss off the States, but what would their reaction be? Now that's a good question.

How would it destroy them navally? just because US has a few more carriers than them? This isnt HOI4

We may do a land war. We won't be alone. There will be many countries on the ground too. Including India which has a large population that China worries about. with our military and allies would win in the end. It won't be our guys just shooting bullets and hope we have enough bullets. Will be using ally soldiers too. Drone strikes, bombers, tanks, etc.

Everyone

Britain would win lol

@@Billyzgstar Maybe in it's region . Ireland , France, Scotland rebellion would be tough but Britain has better will power and joint naval and air power domains. Geography . England safe! That's my assumption I'm probably totally off but it's hypothetical. Hopefully ww3 doesn't happen or if it does just limited nuclear exchange . Everything and everyone believes we should live?? Right??

Russia and china would eat japan alive bro...

@@Bababoy6969 incorrect. I’d recommended looking at both unit effectiveness as well as the time Japan would have to setup defensive positions. An invasion as sizable as this would be seen weeks ahead of time, so the U.S.A. would bolster their support troops in Japan, as well as Japan ensuring readiness of their reserves and mobilizing all possible forces.

@@btr-70 soo u think russia and china whould annouce they are attacking japan.... i think japan would have around 10 to 15 hours to prelare a all out defense

@@Bababoy6969 that would take months of build up and a schedule time because of the weather

@@conductingintomfoolery9163 dude...its not a damn soccer game its a invasion....

I thought so too. But then leaving it Korea was a pretty good assumption I think as N korea would take advantage of chaos and try moving south, so S Korea would be preoccupied and unable to immediately help. S korea is in a geographical downside in that their capital is within stones throw of N Korean artillery.

Well realistically, I doubt Russia would side with China in a war anyway. China is more of a threat to Russian land than America is.

we will never join the war! It does not benefit us and has nothing to do with us. The Australian people are angry with our involvement in Middle East. It's political suicide for our government to join WW3.

@@aussieboy4090 yeah, I think Americans forget that China is our biggest trading partner.

This is a good point. US keeps a lot of forces in Europe.

@Drew of course we would need NATO. 70% of our forces would be in the Pacific.

All his videos on Russia need an update Russia getting decimated in Ukraine and he's as quiet as a church mouse.

@@rdf4315 no army has fought a war like the one currently in Ukraine but whatever

Revenge for the rape of nanking.

Patrick Milewski The hundreds of thousands of Japanese burned alive in US firebombings in 1945 not good for you? Stop being an idiot.

It'll probably be less than you think since both sides would avoid going after each other's mainland, as it's suicidal to do so anyway. But Okiniwans will suffer, no doubt, their great grandparents faced it before.

3-10% fully acceptable

Without US support? They couldn't get too close to either Russia or China who both have large numbers of anti-ship missiles. Japan itself would be safe but the southern Ryuku are basically indefensible. They can certainly break any attempt at a blockade on the Eastern sea though.

are you kidding？？？？？？？

Forward to 2021. SOmeone needs to remind Binkov, if US cant even defeat a few Taliban soldiers with outdated AK 47 running on sandals, what makes you think the US can defeat China and Russia COMBINED? lol. Sorry, but this is at the minimum, laughable.

@@fredh8065 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The only way usa can defeat Russia or China is by their western news(nato alliance help)

From Superman & Sailormoon. Just kidding. For sure in real life everybody will intervene. Because there's a possibility that China & Japan's neighboring countries will be affected. War is not the answer. Only dumb people will do that. 🥰😍😘✌

Random Person Why would anyone want to invade those two? There is nothing of value there. I know Russians are forever talking about being surrounded but nobody cares about Russia and nobody cares about China also. Poor lands for farming and even worse transportation systems. Both countries are toilets.

Well said dude..cheers✌️🔥🙏

Americans are a bunch of snowflakes. Literally every video they're discussed if they're losing they whine in the comments about how "inaccurate" it is.

@@MrEvan1932 yes you are right

@@MrEvan1932 dude. Noone is saying that at all... dont try and find a way to throw shade on americans just because your country hates them

@Stephen Jenkins ikr. They say were snowflakes and shit, and it honestly gets annoying from how hypocritical it is

Taiwan, India, Japan, Indonesia, Australia would be on china while Russia would literally have the force of E.U. on them.

@@iamaloafofbread8926 I'm sure even Muslim country would help Australia against china

China can’t do it on their own. Without Russia this isn’t a scenario worth playing with. This is just for fun

Are u sure about that?

@@VasiliyLanov Yes, because China wants Vladivostok.

@@SelfProclaimedEmperor They could take it np back in 199x.

Forward to 2021. SOmeone needs to remind Binkov, if US cant even defeat a few Taliban soldiers with outdated AK 47 running on sandals, what makes you think the US can defeat China and Russia COMBINED? lol. Sorry, but this is at the minimum, laughable.

@@fredh8065 Fun fact we did beat Taliban soldiers with AKs we killed 51k of them at the cost of 3.5k coalition deaths and its fairly low for both sides. We kicked the Taliban in so hard they didn't want to fight us head to head and camped out in the mountains waiting for a chance to pull a quick ambush. It's just that after we left the Taliban were engaging in conventional warfare.

@@belluh-1huey102 But you didn't defeat them did you? just admit it y'all left because you couldn't defeat them the same y'all failed in vietnam and got your ass whooped LMAO.. stop making excuses and embarrassing yourself anymore.

@@ayanokoji715 Fun fact China got their ass whooped by Vietnam in 1979 in under a year and did a 70s recreation of the Winter war between the Soviets and Finnish. Also, casualties prove otherwise we have a more conservative kill ratio and we still kill more of them. Tell me an instance we lost a major battle in which the Taliban actually fought the US to a one on fight instead of the Taliban just waiting to fight the poorly experienced ANA. It doesn't take anyone with 2 braincells to see that the ANA did the majority of the fighting post 2021. Not to mention mission completed in 2014 and the new mission wasn't to fight the Taliban, but to make the ANA fight the Taliban more often. So get your facts straight, also we had a better kill ratio against the Vietnamese Land, Sea, and Air wise in which we killed more. The NVA invaded a the South in 75 against a ARVN force with 0 US troops as the last troop from the US left in 1973 aka 2 years before the Fall of Saigon.

#Kamchatka Vs Japanese Torpedo Boats in the Baltic Sea

well the purpose of this video was china + russia vs japan + us, obviously there are other players that could happen but thats not this video

I don't think the next world war will involve nukes. My bet is all nuclear powers would fight it out in nonnuclear nations territory. Much like the Russians and Americans did in the cold war but on much larger scale

China is facing a catastrophic population crash in the next 25 years. They have had the one child family policy since 1979 until recently, and the people are apparently still following it. Therefore, pretty soon, the vast majority of their population will be geriatric, and that’s going to be very difficult.

It wouldn’t be just by the US. The US navy would block ALL trade to China that comes over sea

What exactly is a Red? A Communist? A Republican? A Cincinnati baseball fan? It's been nearly 30 years since Russia was Red if you mean Communist... Guess we're all nuts to take strategy from a talking frog puppet...

@@cs-rj8ru Dude, red as the color that Binkov used in this scenario lmao

Russia and Chinas "capitalism" are not even close to the USA' s capitalism.

I'm not sure they matter. The US can win this alone. Canada definitely doesn't have the power projection to do much in that area.

Hg Giacomello Yes,in Russia all citizens can vote at the presidential elections,unlike China and the USA

Bro this sounded like the grown up equivalent of playing with dolls

I live in WA, right in the middle of a handful of naval bases and dozens of local ports. We have half a dozen decommissioned ships within sight of my house that could be overhauled into working conditions as well in the Bremerton port!

@@LancesArmorStriking Why do you think the USAF keeps fighters in Alaska? It's a scenario that's been wargamed a lot, it's one in Larry Bond's Harpoon, there is even one for C:MANO

@@pogo1140 I'm aware. I'm just saying the way you described it, came attached with a giddiness that sounded almost childlike. I guess everyone has their hobbies

@@LancesArmorStriking well, in every iterations of that Russia Alaska transit, I've not seen one where a Russian/Soviet surface combatant ever survived long enough to make it past the Aleutians. Not without the US bases in Alaska, Washington, California and Nevada getting nuked 1st.

Japan: Sweats radioactively

I wonder who made that assumption?