Already started! People love the likes off sheep

Yeah 😂

I literally rushed to the comment section to see them 😂🤣

Yesterday ref and VAR bottle it in favor of Arsenal against Tottenham yes is normal! but when it was City 115 charges .

Except they were brought in in 2013. If you are going to comment maybe understand what you are commenting about?

@@lilbaz8073 Newcastle takeover: 7/10/21 New rules: introduced 14/12/21 if you are going to comment, maybe understand what you're commenting about?

@@lilbaz8073 Newcastle takeover 7/10/21 New rules implemented 14/12/21

@lilbaz8073 Newcastle takeover 7/10/21 new rules implemented 14/12/21

That's how we ended up with the Man City problem, all that would do is increase player transfer fees and make lower clubs without rich owners be even more screwed

@@chrisd3676 but most clubs have rich owners

Rich owners don't want to have to pump in huge sums of money every year to cover enormous operating losses. But if some of your competitors are doing it, you feel like you have to do it too. This is why every club, even those with rich owners, has voted to adopt the 85% squad cost control ratio. If there were no financial controls then transfer fees and wages would spiral out of control, and then it becomes a race to the bottom, a race to see which club goes into administration first. Pumping in a lot of money doesn't guarantee anything anyway. Look at Everton. Their owners have pumped in over £700m, and look at the state of them. They've massively underperformed, and they're a financial basketcase BECAUSE of that unsustainable business model of relying on owner funding every year to keep their heads above water.

I think salary cap would work if it's done all across Europe

Tell me more. How would you do that. How would the salary cap be calculated?

So epl has a cap and Spain Italy ect don’t good luck to English teams in Europe

@@aaroncollinsboi that’s the issue. It would have to be Europe wide.

It's only fair though as they are the reason the premiership is biggest in the world, especially Manchester United who are the main reason and they have made all the other teams known around the world is teams like west ham, everton, Sheffield etc play terrible football and no one around the world would know them if not for Manchester United. There was even talk of calling it the Ferguson premier league which I believe everyone would like to happen

As simple as that!!! Why try to make an investor trying to invest in a business he bought look like a crime? Why even allow him to buy the business if he can't invest in it!

@@NATAR160 Because it’s cheating. How can small Newcastle become the richest club over night when teams like Liverpool Madrid Bayern have been battling for many many years

@@unclegooner7870 That's how investment works. Otherwise, don't sell business to ppl who have the ability to use their funds to transform it overnight. What's the purpose of bringing billionaires into a business they cannot transform thru funding the business??? What's their purpose in the business? To be dragged behind by rules that says the business shd remain mediocre forever?

​@@unclegooner7870cry more 😢

Thanks for that word salad pal 👍 you are so edgy!! And you are so smart using those sexy words!

I was waiting for someone to comment it 😂🤣🤣

Have you read the rules? It would anchor top clubs to spending 4.5 x that of the revenue of smaller clubs. The ONLY club that will directly be impacted by this is CITY, since they are currently spending more than the anchoring sum would allowed, meaning they would have to sell a few players or cut down on their wage bill. Maybe next time READ what the rules are

spot on. unless there is a cap across all major UEFA clubs this will only result in elite players looking to play elsewhere. when I was a kid Serie A was the juggernaut, but due to the money that came into English football from Sky, things have shifted. it would be hubris to think we can remain the most viewed league in the world if we can't pay the highest wages anymore.

City are fcuked anyway for previous fraud charges so it won't make any difference to them.

How?

No salary cap yet, ffp is gone replaced by psr which itself is now being replaced. Ffp and psr are about clubs not being able to spend a certain amount above what they generate over any two year period.

I was waiting for someone to comment it 😂🤣

Manchester City violated the regulations under the previous framework, and these violations will be addressed according to the previous rules. Any new regulations will apply to infractions occurring after their implementation.

Wtf are you on about? How can a new set of rules possibly help Man City who are charged with breaching a previous set of rules?

While I agreed with the basis, football is much harder to operate using general business governance. It’s not uncommon to have a deep red year that hopefully should be balanced out over time. Say you are in UCL and earning 100m, you built a squad with wages at 70m. However, you didn’t qualified for UCL next season and your estimated revenue is down to 60m because two stars were out injured. Now you have to sell both stars to maintain the book. This would prohibit any sort of ambitious move and would make the life of those promoted teams even worse. On the flip side, say your club get a donation of 500m from “fans”. Now they can pay whatever and outmuscle/devalue the other teams. It’s a difficult problem but we need to ask why do we need such a thing. Is it for the fairness of the teams in that league or to prevent the club heritage from bad ownership who lost interest in them. IMO, any club should be allowed an injection of cash to spend up to certain point per season. This can tie to the league position they finished in, think of it as optional revenue. So if small club want to invest in for that season, they can do so for extra push. Then use the last 5 seasons finishing position as aggregated so one hit wonder doesn’t just splurge into doom after an accidental spell. They can require set-aside cash to be reserved at club based on wages(x%) to help ease their downfall and delay asset stripping of a club. Without agenda, I’m sure those people are much smarter than me to come up with an adequate rule to help governs the clubs.

That horse has bolted. Implementing that system now would guarantee a hierarchy.

That's like saying you can't spend £1bn on a skyscraper before you've only made £10m from properties.

Well the current rules are also not “fair” clubs who have ambition have to sell their best players to tick the box even though theyre in no financial debt or strain Clubs with huge debt can keep spending because theyve locked in high revenues which other clubs will never be able to catch It works both ways

@@n9ne_nufc I don't see it this way. I like the idea of setting a spending cap in principle, although a lot of the issues we complain about now will still happen, albeit with clubs having accumulated more debt. I say it’s unfair because it’s essentially telling a person who legally generates enough to afford a Lamborghini not to buy anything more expensive than a Lexus just because the neighbor can only afford a Toyota. Clubs that are “forced” to sell their best assets are doing so because they are close to or past the debt limit and may want to improve their squads but must balance their books to do so. FFP, though flawed, says spend as much as you want as long as a) you don’t pass the set limit. This was a measure put in place to prevent clubs from recklessly continuing to accumulate debt in the pursuit of “ambition” while jeopardizing the club's existence. A club that has spent a ton to acquire great assets can’t blindly continue to spend, blowing past the set limit. If you’re at the limit, you have a few choices: keep player(s) and don’t dip into the market or increase the club’s revenue (commercial, asset sales) to allow for squad development. It’s a choice. b) the money being spent is revenue generated by the club. This was implemented to prevent nation-states and the like from pouring in endless resources with the added effect of distorting the market. Ultimately, I'd like to see a happy medium (if such a thing exists). Organizations that aren’t run sustainably eventually go under. Allow for competitive spend as long as it’s within the clubs means. A spending cap that doesn’t feel like self-sabotage will also be a win

It's to stop Newcastle. The cartel are terrified. 😂

Not sure if youve seen the numbers but most teams would be able to spend more than they have last season. Only City and Chelsea were slightly above the threshold The rule likely wont pass because the “big 6” clubs will do everything in their power to block this as its a means to close the gap on them but it most definitely wouldnt make English teams unable to compete in Europe

@n9ne_nufc when real and psg are spending whatever they like, how are arsenal, liverpool meant to compete. As you said city is over the limit and yet they still can't make semi. It'll make PL harder to win too

@@zaw05 I dont care about how Arsenal and Liverpool are able to compete with PSG if Newcastle are unable to compete with Arsenal and Liverpool The City example you have used is poor really because they battered Madrid and went out on penalties and the figures refer to last season when they won the trebble anyway We were unlucky not to go through our group and took 4 points off PSG with a team full of relegation players so I have no worries about being able to compete with teams like PSG, the rules need to be changed so EVERYONE can spend not just the teams you care about at the “top”

@n9ne_nufc of cos not. You only care about your team, you don't care about the clubs in your league doing well in Europe. Consequently your team won't be able to compete in Europe and PL won't get extra qualification spot🙃

There not allowed to speculate on city charges no main stream media are. CITY said they will sue anyone who uses defamatory language about us in the main stream

Cry more lol

If you weren't so stupid you'd know why, City deny the charges whereas Everton and Forest admit theirs, that's why they've been docked and City haven't as yet as they haven't been found guilty yet.

​@@thefourmidablecentur100ns6fake man city fan base

Why? Did you wanna have a little tug over her????