Tanks K2

Mighty HIMARS mate. LOADS of them.

They have conditions for this and they have to do it because of a large bear that is looking for food in a neighbor's garden

@@mts5217😂

Yes. Different branches of US take four top spots.

I think it takes 10 000 extra military personel to keep track of the numbers of the U.S millitary :D

Four strongest Airforces on the world are: US Airforce US Navy US Marines and US Army Then China...

Maybe in personnel if you’re talking about Army

True, however, the experience of battle proven training program makes so that, there is more to it than just the numbers. When Poland receive a massive amount of high tech weapons, they will need enough trained soldiers to operate them in combat. U.K has decades of experience by being involved in Iran, Irak, Afganistan, training Ukrainian soldiers and operating with U.S troops. This is not to be ignored.

@@kataclysmad1065 Poland also took part in Iraq and Afghanistan. has been closely cooperating and training with the US for years, Poles also train Ukrainian soldiers

Is this a parody comment? Or a "I'm american and I know nothing, and I'm damn proud of my ignorance" comment? Damn you've managed to fit so much crap into such a short comment. Stop talking about a topic you're clearly clueless about. Europe has 0 military industrial production? LMAO. Europe produces absolutely every piece of military equipment imaginable, and in 90% of cases the best in the world. Ships, helicopters, artillery, air defense, missiles, tanks, guns, etc. all better than anything anyone else produces. The only things USA makes better than Europe are 5th gen fighter jets, but that's gonna chance one EU starts making 6th gen fighters. Dude, France alone is ranked 2nd in the world behind USA and ahead of Russia in terms of military industry production and exporting. You're absolutely clueless about Europe. European part of NATO is some 2x more powerful than USA.

Stop watching russian propaganda....Romania only produces more tanks, ammunitions and weapons then Russia.....let's be serious,if Europe has ,,near 0 military industrial production'' as you were informed, were the ammo and weapons used by Ukraine in the last 2 years comes from? Because only a small percentage comes from USA.

this right here IS the primary thing many of these silly video's simply seem to ignore , F U E L ........for a huge military it takes an unimaginable amount of fuel to power it and if a global war started this fuel supply would diminish extremely fast , granted some vehicles run on alternate fuel sources but that is tiny compared to the whole .......logistically speaking if you have no fuel to power vehicles your attacks/defense grind down to something like 10% of the whole ......if you can't logistically supply your forces , food/water/weapons/munitions then you have no force other than a defensive one to protect your home then the ONLY other option is nuclear........in recent years there has been many fuel crises going on fuel supplies on the brink already , military's around the world have a stockpile for the purposes of war but if war broke out that would burn down super fast and once it's gone it would fall heavily (extremely heavily) onto alternate fuel sources in which case that would mean a FULL refit of military vehicles (planes/boats/ground vehicles/and even hardware-rockets) which simply isn't doable in war time with no fuel .......a large force in large scale combat is not really feasible now (look what happened in ukraine when the russian massive convoy was stopped in it tracks for weeks due to fuel.

Why would thé US transport anything when it got 800 bases containing ~150k personnel all over the world in addition to feud that can cover its demand

Yes I said that with the numbers sounds a bit inaccurate

@@CombatReadyHQ Yeah you were spot on with that but also the equipment both numbers and type. Still enjoyable.

Sorry but I think you have to do some research on that claim one more time. They have the same speed, same power output, firepower M256 cannon, also known as the Rheinmetall L44 so the same. As for protection, a know complaint in US military among tank crew is that the driver is not well protected but also most is classified regarding both sides. Same goes for sensors and fire control, so unless you got information on both parties I call that subjective bias. Several contests have show the Leopard winning several times, by all means feel free to fact check with some use of the Goggle machine. Oh and I'm not saying the Abrahams is a bad tank in any way, it's just not superior to Leopard 2 Sidenote, the Leopard 2A5S ( Swedish variant ) is the most protected of all the Leopards and basically most modern tanks and as you know there are a lot of variants of the Leopard 2. As an example. Read More: www.slashgear.com/1316789/m1-abrams-vs-leopard-2-tank/

Not really. But A for effort. 👍🏻

False, false, false, and oh, false. There's literally nothing the M1 does better. Nothing. Ukrainians also say it's absolutely garbage, actually useless in combat, gets stuck in environments that other tanks go through without breaking a sweat, it can't be used on mud because the air intakes for the gas turbine engine gets clogged in like 5 minutes of driving, it's too heavy, it has a horrible power to weight ratio, and a horrible weight to surface contact ratio, so it has no grip, accelerates poorly and sinks into any muddy terrain like a led weight. It's also got too many weak spots, no auto loader, the gun is not as well integrated as the one on the Leopards despite being technically the same, it lets out a HUGE heat signature due to the gas turbine engines, so it's totally useless at night and also in the day when thermal cams can pick it up very easily, and it's a super easy target for drones. Ukranians say it's by far the worst tank they got from the west, and say it's worse than their old T72 in terms of effectiveness in battle. And yea, keep up the "MURICAH NUMBAH ONE" attitude, ignorantly believing everything you make is better, when in 99% of cases in reality it's not.

You said it. You do not understand.

Italy is an industrialized country and is part of the G7....Turkey is not!

Dude... go to the horse races, maybe it's better

"United korea" Korea isn't united dude. you talking N' Korea? S.Korea? N. Korea military is weak compared to most if stand alone. their military tech is so outdated, they couldn't win a war if they went back to 1950's now! As for China, the only Asian country with enough power to be respected but never feared. yes they have the numbers, but the experience and tech is behind even Japan and S. Korea. Japan, it's tech is on part with American to a point. since most of it's tech is American, they just don't have the numbers. Taiwan, their tech is good, but not top notch, their numbers are few and their geography alone is bad. As for Hong Kong, last I heard that was a part of China. so they wouldn't even get a mention in this. Sorry Hong Kong! As for your statement that East Asian combined is "stronger" than all of Nato, you just saw only the 10 countries in it. and those 10 countries have the numbers and firepower to wipe most of Asia off the planet. non nuke warefare. just for numbers. sorry man, but East Asia cannot compare to Nato.

NATO is not fighting Russia, just supplying weapons. And Russia couldn’t even handle Ukrainians and its 2 weeks special operation has gone too long

@@GirmaKassa-ip7ht aaaa NATO its not fighting Russia ... Then explain me who have trained ukrainian trops since 2014 coup untill 2022 ??? the alians ???? No ... Russia its fighting againts NATO TRAINED TROPS, EQUIPMENT, TACTICS, INTELIGENCE SERVICES, ETC .. there is nothing in thIS comflict that its not FROM NATO ... even the coup in KIEV was realized with the help of USA and UE

@@GirmaKassa-ip7ht IF ukraininan trops have been trained in NATO tactics ( since 2014 coup untill 2022 = 8 years of training ) , IF ukrainian trops are using NATO weapons and NATO intelegence services ... . Then russia it figthing not againt ukraine but againts all NATO military power, tactics and intelegence ... . Iam going to ask you again: "if NATO its that strong how many milimiters of terrain did NATO trops manage to regain from russia" ? . If NATO its strong then why are you seending f-16 insted of seending f-22 ?? send f-22 insted bro and american trops also please ... f-16 are old as fuck ... send the new ones for you to learn something new ...

hmm Poland over rated ?? Funny In 2023, 116 M1A1 tanks were signed for supply to Poland, of which 40 have already been delivered. The remaining 76 machines are to arrive this year, and in 2025 another 125 tanks from the USA will be delivered to us. This time we are talking about M1A2 tanks purchased in 2022. Another 18 K2 tanks from South Korea will arrive in Poland in 2023 (we already have 28 machines in total). At the end of 2024, their number is expected to increase to 84, and to 180 in 2025. A contract for additional K2 tanks is also expected this year. This time, some of them would be built in Poland. The Ministry of National Defense announced in the past that it intended to purchase another 820 K2 tanks.

Even more is happening in rocket artillery. The Polish Army already has 15 of the 218 K239 Chumnoo launchers ordered. The Korean launchers are mounted on the Polish Jelcz 8x8 chassis. Last year, we received 18 M142 HIMARS launchers, which we ordered in 2019. We also want to buy thousands of rockets with M142 launchers. Poland will receive 2,766 GMLRS-AW M30A1 missiles and 3,126 GMLRS M31 missiles. Both missiles have a range of approximately 80 km, and one M142 HIMARS set can carry up to 6 such missiles at one time. The Polish rocket artillery may also be armed with 3,192 GMLRS ER missiles with a range of 150 km. We will also have at our disposal much heavier MGM-140 ATACMS missiles with a warhead weighing 227 kg. Their range is 300 km.

What would artillery be without reconnaissance? This is to ensure, among others, nearly 1,700 FlyEye unmanned aerial vehicles. This number of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) is covered by the framework agreement signed last year. Will we see an executive agreement in 2024? Time will tell. By 2023, the Polish Army has received a total of 168 FlyEyes. In 2022-23, 3 of the 4 Bayraktar TB2 sets ordered (6 UAVs each) arrived. This year we will see the delivery of the last set ordered.

I won't mention planes and infantry fighting vehicles - because we keep buying like crazy.

@@dawidkujawski3340 no please don’t embarrass your self any more by mentioning Poland’s Air Force of 50 and future F35 or their navy with 2 frigates one sub oh please tell us about Thai air defense oops I forgot is coming soon

They are stronger than All you say? So tell me where from they got they're equipment from?😂

That kind of nervous laugh