Crazy Engines You've Never Heard of: the 351, 478, and 637ci V6/V8 GMC ToroFlow Diesels!

  Рет қаралды 47,332

Rare Classic Cars & Automotive History

Rare Classic Cars & Automotive History

3 ай бұрын

Enjoy this spotlight on a rare and virtually unknown series of engines, the 1964-74 GMC ToroFlow diesels!

Пікірлер: 213
@joecummings1260
@joecummings1260 3 ай бұрын
Back around 1990 I put a 478 gasoline in a GMC dump truck that had a blown up 305 in it. A guy I knew showed up im my shop and said "Hey I've got one of those engines" Next day he showed up with it in the back of his pickup and sold it to me for 200 bucks. I started looking and saw the dual thermostat housing and knew what it was. Damn that thing was a torque monster. You hardly ever have to shift. Funny thing about it was the exhaust had a low deep rumble that set off car alarms of cars parked on the street
@thebegrsshow
@thebegrsshow 3 ай бұрын
Being a Stealership Mechanic in the Oldsmo-Buick days was a lot of fun. If those things made it past 50,000 miles without the heads flying off, they'd go 200,000. The ones that didn't got a Target Motor, Hecho En Mexico with thicker decks, larger head bolts, and a stronger fire ring design head gaskets. Did I mention Warranty Work Flat Rate sucks?
@stevelee5724
@stevelee5724 3 ай бұрын
Mexico engines ay ! Chur 😊
@stevelee5724
@stevelee5724 3 ай бұрын
We're mexco engine blocks high nodularity ?
@stevelee5724
@stevelee5724 3 ай бұрын
Stealership ! I just got it....😂 the good old days ay mate ! We didn't see them here in New Zealand, if so not many if any ! (That's a Kiwi music mention bro) Massive, impressive engines mate ! Wow... Cheers from New Zealand 🇳🇿
@488ci
@488ci 3 ай бұрын
You could also get a Target 350 gas. Did they come from the same place? How good were the replacement diesels? I know they got good fuel mileage till they broke down.
@Bloodcurling
@Bloodcurling 3 ай бұрын
​@@stevelee5724You can edit your comment and not "triple text"
@turbo8454
@turbo8454 3 ай бұрын
Among other things I have a running surviving Olds diesel with 230,000 on the clock. It is one of my summer drivers. I also have a 478 Toro Flow that I acquired years ago for $67.00. Might make a good pickup truck engine lol.The dump truck in my avatar has a 478 Magnum gasoline V6.
@AlexanderWaylon
@AlexanderWaylon 3 ай бұрын
As the former owner daily driver of a 351 gmc V6 which acted like a 4.3 performance wise with 454 mileage with a stromberg carburetor using a unique carburetor pattern and a floor pivoting mechanically sprung throttle, I must admit this was a depressing engine to find service parts for. It was hard to maintain it really was. I was lucky to have the help I had from the likes of my surrogate father a brilliant body man who held a GM license whose career and financial success peaked in the mid 1980s. That engine line was good but bad because it was ghosted and abandoned.
@retirednavychief6983
@retirednavychief6983 3 ай бұрын
My first 305 gave the parts stores headaches!! "Hi, I need a for a '63 GMC 305." Parts guy..."There's no such thing, you mean a ford v8 305, right?" "Nope, GMC V6 305." Parts guy..."There's no such thing..." and on and on and on!
@DSP1968
@DSP1968 3 ай бұрын
Adam, I'm really enjoying your engine video series. I've been learning a lot! Thank you.
@RareClassicCars
@RareClassicCars 3 ай бұрын
Thx DSP ;)
@dmandman9
@dmandman9 3 ай бұрын
Me too. I’m learning stuff I never knew I didn’t know. I look forward to his videos.
@TheCarCrazyGuy
@TheCarCrazyGuy 3 ай бұрын
Steve Magnante talks about these engines as well. Very interesting subject.
@johnh2514
@johnh2514 3 ай бұрын
Great info. The first I heard of these engines was on Steve Magnante’s channel. I never knew that some of those old GMC medium duty trucks and buses had V6 engines, albeit large ones.
@bizznackywhirle5437
@bizznackywhirle5437 3 ай бұрын
It is worth noting that, while the initial Toro-flow diesels were normally aspirated, GMC did offer turbocharged versions of the 478 and 637 later on.
@plhebel1
@plhebel1 3 ай бұрын
I remember some of these engines. My father worked for Coca Cola at my small town bottling plant and used these GMC trucks in delivery fleet. I recall adjusting overhead lash on the older engines with solid lifters and cam with the engine running and oil flying all over the place. Those were the days.
@davidpawson7393
@davidpawson7393 3 ай бұрын
We used a set of valve covers with essentially a window cut out for valve adjustment with the cut piece bent to catch most of the oil getting slung. Glued the gaskets in so you didn't have to fiddle fuck with sliding gaskets trying to line the bolt holes up.
@corgiowner436
@corgiowner436 3 ай бұрын
GM made a huge mistake not putting a water separator in the Olds 350 diesel.
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
Right on 👍. Water/fuel separator and some high quality head studs rather than bolts would changed history DRASTICALLY.
@67marlins
@67marlins 3 ай бұрын
Thank you for covering these heavy-duty V-6s from GMC again. Somewhere, a person called them the 'Hercules' series of engines because of their durability. I particularly like the V-6 478...hitting its maximum torque of about 440 at 1400 rpm....think about that. You reach your maximum pulling power in a truck not many revs above pulling away from the stop sign..
@turbo8454
@turbo8454 3 ай бұрын
@67marlins The 478M in my dump truck is the perfect choice for such duties. In fact as far as I'm concerned, there is no better automotive heavy duty gasoline engines than the big block GMC V6's. Even the small 305 has it's torque peak at 1600 RPM.
@67marlins
@67marlins 3 ай бұрын
@@turbo8454 I'm a Ford and Mopar guy, but always admired the GMC V-6s. I think I read somewhere that GMC engineers felt that a V-6 had certain advantages over a V-8.....( some of which we already know, like less complexity, a 60-degree block for possibly better serviceability underhood ), but I thought they also said a V-6 block was sturdier ( less flex ) and more stout, but also that cubic inch-per-cubic inch, somehow a V-6 achieved max torque at lower rpm.....(?!?) In other words, GMC wasn't designing an all-new truck engine just to be different or avoid the penalty of having an inferior chevy engine, but they honestly concluded that a well-designed V-6 was better. I have to admire GM for letting their GMC Division develop and build what they thought was best. That was the elegance and intelligence of GM's intended organization- cooperate when needed but compete where reasonable.
@67marlins
@67marlins 3 ай бұрын
​@@turbo8454You're familiar with the Ford Super-Duty truck engines, I imagine? V'8s, starting in 1958, ran through early 70s. They were just for huge commercial applications like dump trucks, buses, F650 and up. They had no business being in half-ton pickups. 401, 477 and a 534. The 534 weighed over 1,100 pounds.
@turbo8454
@turbo8454 3 ай бұрын
@@67marlins The V6 certainly has some advantages over the inline 6. I do not know what GMC was thinking when they designed it other than perhaps to be a worthy replacement for the inline 6's, some of which dated back to the 1920's Buick 6 cylinder engines. The low torque peak RPM has nothing to do with cylinder layout however. The largest factor of where the torque peak RPM occurs is the intake valve event timing.
@turbo8454
@turbo8454 3 ай бұрын
@@67marlins I am familiar with the Ford Super Duty's as well as all the other big gas burners of the 50's, 60's and 70's.
@peterbenson3776
@peterbenson3776 3 ай бұрын
I like your engine video series.
@danw1955
@danw1955 3 ай бұрын
I've been around, and drove a lot of the GMC V6 gas engines, but have only ever seen 1 of the V6 Toro-flow diesels, and it wasn't running at the time. I wasn't even aware that they had a V8 version of that engine. Pretty cool stuff!😉
@davidpawson7393
@davidpawson7393 3 ай бұрын
I live for learning about engines I've never heard of. Just rebuilt my first two stroke last year and it's making me money but only because of people sharing knowledge on KZfaq. Thanks
@arthurn9237
@arthurn9237 3 ай бұрын
THAT GIANT V12 WOULD PULL THA GATES TA HELL DOWN THE TORQUE THEY PRODUCED WAS NOTHING LESS THAN INCREDIBLE
@jefffixesit60
@jefffixesit60 3 ай бұрын
I always thought "Loathsome Diesel Stench" would be a great grunge band name. I'm odd.😊
@jamesengland7461
@jamesengland7461 3 ай бұрын
Pretty good idea!
@trickyricky12147
@trickyricky12147 3 ай бұрын
Yes!!
@stephengreen3566
@stephengreen3566 3 ай бұрын
Thank you again, Adam, for sharing these engines with us.
@timmcooper294
@timmcooper294 3 ай бұрын
Lots of memories here, from a time when GM was still a very innovative company, sometimes making huge mistakes, sometimes minor ones, but all very interesting. I've loved the sound of these since I was a kid riding to school behind one !! Thanks for sharing. You now need to talk about GM medium / heavy duty trucks with independent torsion bar front suspension in the 1960-1966 period. Really interesting stuff !!
@retirednavychief6983
@retirednavychief6983 3 ай бұрын
I agree. My GMCs were NOTHING like Chevrolet pickups. You couldn't even fit a Chevy bed onto a GMC frame.
@jetsons101
@jetsons101 3 ай бұрын
Nothing like the smell of Diesel in the morning.
@harryotaint9163
@harryotaint9163 3 ай бұрын
These are gasoline engines.
@retirednavychief6983
@retirednavychief6983 3 ай бұрын
I got my first GMC V6(a 305 c.i.) while serving in the Navy back in 1985. I bought a former Washington State Forest Service 1963 GMC longbed/stepside. I found probably the last tire ship in Washington(Tacoma to be exact) that would mount new tires onto the original split-rims. I drove that truck from Washington down to California when my ship(USS Belleau Wood) came out of the drydock in Bremerton to return to San Diego. I eventually gave it to my Dad, who drove it form many years up in Northern California The next was a 351 c.i. in a 1962 GMC utility longbed I rescued from a junkyard in Oxnard California in 2000. I ended up finding a fleetside bed for it and even found an early '70s camper that I put on. Whenever I had a long weekend that old beast and I would head east from NAS Pt. Mugu and disappear into the mountains or desert for a few days. Very early I was given a great education in these V6 GMC engines; I learned how NOT to mistreat them and how to keep them running well. The most important thing I learned was not to 'over-rev' these motors. They were designed for low-rpm/high-torgue applications. That made them great for work-trucks. Because of that education I never once had a problem with either engine. I replaced the old points ignition on my '62 with a Pertronix electronic ignition. I also found a nice Holley 'Economaster' 2-barrel carberator. The combination allowed me to get a stable 15mpg with this old beast. I'd love to find another someday.
@bendeleted9155
@bendeleted9155 3 ай бұрын
Sounds! What a treat. That's the first thing to go away forever. Thanks Adam. 👍
@victorjohnson7512
@victorjohnson7512 3 ай бұрын
Those were low rpm commercial engines when gasoline was still common in big trucks.
@Hogger280
@Hogger280 3 ай бұрын
The Toro Flow diesels typically had a red line of 2800 - not a low rpm engine.
@thomasrapp2536
@thomasrapp2536 3 ай бұрын
Oh the stench of the Olds 350 diesel disaster. It still lingers to this day!! And as a friend of mine calls them, the GMC Toilet Flows
@krissfemmpaws1029
@krissfemmpaws1029 3 ай бұрын
Knew two guys that had the Toroflow in a couple of their trucks they seemed to like them. One of the guys said the difference in fuel cost almost made the truck payment. Having talked with a few mechanics that worked on the Olds diesels the big reason for the head gasket failures was due to the poor grade of bolts used for the head bolts meaning the head bolts would stretch. The quality of the head gaskets was also suspect.
@damianbowyer2018
@damianbowyer2018 3 ай бұрын
Wow Adam, this is AMAZING info that is not known by anyone, except U...So much to learn for all of us Adamites😮😉👍👏
@V8-friendly
@V8-friendly 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for showing such unique engines that I had no idea of! Very interesting.
@ratman5727
@ratman5727 3 ай бұрын
Adam, your videos are very informative, and your delivery of commentary is perfect. A true "find" on youtube these days. No fancy introductions, just the facts. Thank you!
@philkey8135
@philkey8135 3 ай бұрын
Would LOVE for you to do a presentation of a hearse. They are a unique and necessary component of vehicle history. Most are Black, some are White, others are Silver, some are even Green. Have seen Red one, which I view as beautiful!!!! Hope you will take the challenge.
@kevinkoepke8311
@kevinkoepke8311 3 ай бұрын
I'm really enjoying this engine series. Keep it up. Thanks!
@user-mm7ur9yr4m
@user-mm7ur9yr4m 3 ай бұрын
Really interesting great content and presentation.
@rustyshank912
@rustyshank912 3 ай бұрын
I have only seen one of these running so far. It was a 478 diesel in a new idea uni system it is a self propelled power unit you could put a corn picker, forage harvestor, and a combine attachment that went onto it. Also if an old mechanic friend of mine is to be believed any auto/truck have more injector pump issues than the same diesels used for ag or marine as you mentioned do to more consistent rpm use.
@garysarratt1
@garysarratt1 3 ай бұрын
I bet the old pump made a lot less pressure than the newer ones, that may have helped with longevity. Regular old diesel, too, with sulpher in it helping lube things.
@johnsteffen2248
@johnsteffen2248 3 ай бұрын
We had a 1975 705 New Idea Uni system with that 478 GM Diesel , It had Bosch injection pump stamped made in Germany , We had the hulking bed with a 4 row snapping head that we also used with the cage shelter, We also had the 767 super chopper for corn & hay ,Chopping the hay worked the P155 out of it but never had any engine issues ,Changed the oil ever 100 hours ,It's been30 plus years ago but when I sold the dairy farm to retire I think it had north of 3,000 hours on it , We also picked ear corn ,Shelled corn & filled silos for people in the area ,Filled 15-20 silos a year, I don't think it ever used more than 3 gallons a. hour even chopping hay., The only issue was it was cold blooded with it below 30 degrees, I used towarm it up with a Knipco heater blowing on the block if we were shelling corn laye in the season.
@typrus6377
@typrus6377 3 ай бұрын
Direct-Injection was the exception back then, not the rule. Modern diesels almost all have the bowl in the piston because of the DI. Very interesting.
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
Were these Toro Flows direct injected?
@typrus6377
@typrus6377 3 ай бұрын
@@johneckert1365 Yes. The fuel is injected directly into the cylinder, not into a pre-chamber.
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
@@typrus6377 Thank you
@buellpilot67
@buellpilot67 3 ай бұрын
Had a Chevy Caprice station wagon with the Olds 350 diesel, bought it new in 1981, I guess that by 81 GM had worked out the problems with that engine because I had no issues with the engine or for that matter the rest of the vehicle. would give 33 MPG on a trip, with only 105 horsepower you did have to exercise patience on a hill however. Ran great until I traded it in with 90K miles.
@67marlins
@67marlins 3 ай бұрын
You probably had the better DX block, which eliminated many of the design flaws of the original block. I think your DX block began production as a running change for 1980....meaning that some 1979s actually got them too. It was a good engine...although I'm amazed you got 33 mpg...wow!
@cdjhyoung
@cdjhyoung 3 ай бұрын
The only man I ever met that was happy with his Olds Diesel was a farmer that transplanted one in a former tractor pulling tractor that he was now using for harvesting hay. For him, it was 50% more powerful than the stock engine, sipped fuel and was just a great care free engine. he must have found the happy spot in using that engine because it ran hardly faster than idle all day with little rpm change.
@corerlt
@corerlt 3 ай бұрын
@@67marlins My friends dad got 35 MPG
@seanbatiz6620
@seanbatiz6620 3 ай бұрын
I have a number of original shop service manuals for these very GM & Detroit engine from my dad, who, after years of being a heavy equipment operator & OTR truck driver, went into being a diesel engine tech back in the late 70’s… myself from end of HS into college, went into construction/framing, followed suite by the mid 90’s, working as a cert’d auto tech for gas & diesel, performing repairs for anything & everything.. then, power tool repair/rebuilding to machining. By oh, ‘07, went to OTR and local trucking, then plumbing, then HVAC, then HAZMAT fuel tanker trucking.. since covid, back to auto tech, gas/diesel & all things electrical… I have auto/truck service tech literature from oh, 1903 to early 2000’s, when most of that went to digital. I too really enjoy all of these engine vid series &, anything else you’ve put together/uploaded for us! One of my top 5 sub YT channels! 👍🏻👍🏻
@OLDS98
@OLDS98 3 ай бұрын
Thank you Adam This was interesting. It answered my questions about the Oldsmobile 350 5.7 liter diesel V8. I had often wondered why didn't they consult with someone with expertise and develop over time. I understand now. I know Ford got BMW diesel in Lincoln for a minute. I guess no one has learned anything because Volkswagen and all those European carmakers got in trouble. and so many people paid for that mistake. Thank you. I like that name of that engine "Toroflow". It should have bused used on the Toronado in some capacity for a feature or something. Thank you again. I guess I realized no matter what Oldsmobile did it was not going to get that diesel right.
@grumpyoldfart3891
@grumpyoldfart3891 3 ай бұрын
I had a really strange motor in a GMC truck. It started life as a V8 Toroflow. Somewhere along th line, th heads and intake manifold was swapped out with gas motor parts. I remember that it used th same starter as a John Deere tractor. I sure was glad when that thing finally blew up.
@nb7466
@nb7466 3 ай бұрын
I remeber GM teuck and bus in Pontiac. The place was huge. Gm leaving Pontiac really hurt that place.
@4dirt2racer0
@4dirt2racer0 3 ай бұрын
thanks for the video man :) well done
@scottymoondogjakubin4766
@scottymoondogjakubin4766 3 ай бұрын
I remember when gas was .58 cents a gallon ! We just burned that up like it was nothing ! My buds 73 buick 454 got 20 mpg and we would cruise all night long with gas to spare !
@LongIslandMopars
@LongIslandMopars 3 ай бұрын
Putting the "General" in "General Motors".....😎
@ratman5727
@ratman5727 3 ай бұрын
To a degree, -yes, -and that comes from a long time GM guy. Strange how a company that can get so many things right, -can get so many things wrong. You want to cheer and celebrate the good stuff, but you also want to kick people in the nuts, -what the heck were they thinkin?? 🤣
@LongIslandMopars
@LongIslandMopars 3 ай бұрын
@@ratman5727 I hear ya from a long time Mopar man....😎
@mopartony7953
@mopartony7953 3 ай бұрын
7:52 that piston / head combustion interface is typical of almost all CI engines. Some Dieselized SI would be an exception. I think the Olds CI had SI type cylinder heads.
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
The Olds had flat heads like most diesels, but had a precumbustion chamber inside the heads. That's the difference between "indirect injected" and "direct injected" diesels. Indirect injects the fuel into the precombustion chamber and the explosion farts out into the cylinder. Direct Injected actually injects the fuel into the cylinder, pointed at that little dish with the point in the piston. That little dish is technically the combustion chamber.
@flydieselair
@flydieselair 3 ай бұрын
I was a mechanic in the 70s, it was a mechanics, in joking recommendation that the car owner should purchase and carry a spare crankshaft because the original would usually break. The breaking part was no joke, because they did on several occasions.
@bcwrangler
@bcwrangler 3 ай бұрын
Not sure what problems the 6.2l had which you referred to. I knew quite a few that had long lives.
@kevinvoyer5053
@kevinvoyer5053 3 ай бұрын
Alright! Thanks for another interesting video. Interestingly enough I personally drove a 1968, GMC 6500 straight truck with a 21’ refer box, with a 351 Toro Flow Diesel engine. With a 5 speed low hole 1st, wide ratio w/OD, and a 2 speed rear. We used in a family trucking company. I was bottom man in seniority so I was stuck with “Shaker” as it was affectionately called. But it ran very well, used little oil to leaks not burned, plus it true that used half the fuel the same truck with a 305 V6 Gas used, plus was quicker if you knew how to split the gears, plus higher top speed at 74 mph, as apposed to 72, at the same rpm’s. Funny thing is Shaker looks just like the blue one in the video only with a big white refer box on the back. I personally put well over 200,000 miles over the 8 years I drove it. Then after the union forced us out of business, my Dad sold the truck to a cousin, that wanted that engine for an old tired GMC 2500 step side pickup that had a 305 V6! That had 180,000 miles and was tired. He was restoring it and figured might as well sell that gas engine and trans, then buy the Toro Flow truck off my Dad, rebuilt the TF and use in the pickup, being the very rare diesel powered all 1966 GMC truck around. He rebuilt it, added two air cleaners, one on each manifold and huge dual exhaust out the sides. That pickup was used to haul out dirt bikes and tow a trailer with 10 others for a group of riders following in their other vehicles. Before? With the tired V6 gas, three speed? It was a chore, waiting for it to keep up. But after that? With the rebuilt TF? with 5 speed? He had to add disk brakes in front! Because of the speeds it would easily reach so quickly, especially when towing the trailer! Plus got more than twice the mileage, like 26 highway, 18 towing! With a wonderful sound! Everyone wanted that truck.
@compu85
@compu85 3 ай бұрын
I bet Detroit Diesel would have advised to install a water seperator :)
@trickyricky12147
@trickyricky12147 3 ай бұрын
That diesel at the end sounded very nice Adam. 👌 Unintentionally much needed for me. Lol
@trickyricky12147
@trickyricky12147 3 ай бұрын
It's just like a certain generation of the Duramax diesel that had head gasket issues. Once that's taken care of with upgraded ARP head bolts and tuning and deleting, they are stout after that, but that's more focused on the modern computers on wheels world, but yeah if it wasn't for GM's confidence in making four stroke v8 diesels, they probably would've never debuted the Duramax lineup starting in the 2000s.
@kensmith5694
@kensmith5694 3 ай бұрын
I saw one of these in a marine application. I don't think it was kinder to it that the truck application. The boat was about as streamlined as a brick. Normal speed was about 7kts wide open was about 7.1kts.
@randyfitz8310
@randyfitz8310 3 ай бұрын
I did not know that General Motors built the Detroit motors. Thank you Adam!
@MitzvosGolem1
@MitzvosGolem1 3 ай бұрын
Charles Kettering and the Zephyr Diesel electric train.. First in history. GM bought Detroit diesel in 1930s.
@calimilk1113
@calimilk1113 3 ай бұрын
Awesome!!!
@Gary7even
@Gary7even 3 ай бұрын
The non-cross flow head design looks like that of the typical domestic inline four or six cylinder engines of the time.
@damnyankeerebelprepper1324
@damnyankeerebelprepper1324 3 ай бұрын
Saw many of these in old dump trucks used to haul fish guts on the warf
@DanEBoyd
@DanEBoyd 3 ай бұрын
Woah! I never noticed the valve covers being held on by screws on the V6 Jimmys, as seen in the opening photo!
@andyharman3022
@andyharman3022 3 ай бұрын
Yes, Phillips head screws.
@joedefedele6380
@joedefedele6380 3 ай бұрын
I don't understand that GMC was using balance shafts in their 60 degree V6 & V8 engines. Why didn't Buick use a balance shaft since they worked in GMC engines in their 3.8L (231ci) V6?
@geoffmooregm
@geoffmooregm 3 ай бұрын
The GMC V6 Gas engine did not have a balance shaft. It had 6 separate rod journals and was an even firing. Apparently the diesels did, but not sure why. The Buick V6 was initially a low buck conversion from a V8. But even when it changed to a split pin, even fire engine, the block would have to be re-cast to incorporate a balance shaft. It wasn't until the "on center" block came out that it got it's balance shaft.
@joedefedele6380
@joedefedele6380 3 ай бұрын
Thank You for your response. I appreciate it.@@geoffmooregm
@frasercrone3838
@frasercrone3838 3 ай бұрын
They did not follow the normal formula for diesel engines in that the stroke is usually longer than the bore diameter because in truck type operation you are looking for torque more than top end power. Diesel internal components were generally much heavier so you wanted to keep the RPM down anyway. they are interesting engines that I have never come across. I have repowered 4x4 vehicles with the 350 GM diesel and found it not that good compared to other brands. I wonder if there are many used engines from this GMC series in breaker yards and the like? The pistons with the combustion chamber in them are called Herron chamber pistons and you find them in most diesels as it is easier to machine a piston than it is a head and diesel pistons usually have a thick crown on them because of the combustion pressures and to dissipate heat.
@TheCosmicGuy0111
@TheCosmicGuy0111 3 ай бұрын
Nice!
@southerndiy1
@southerndiy1 3 ай бұрын
Cool engine, never seen a non-crossflow V6 or V8 before
@MitzvosGolem1
@MitzvosGolem1 3 ай бұрын
I had a 478M V6 gas in my 4900 Alison automatic GMC boom truck . Excellent motors. Truck was faster than diesel but burned alot of fuel . 8.1 pincher 366,427 replaced these later .
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
8.2 you mean 😉
@timothykeith1367
@timothykeith1367 3 ай бұрын
GMC 302 inline sixes are an older motor than most Adam has covered, but the 302 is kind of like an earlier version of the Ford 300 inline six. In the 50s aftermarket parts made the GMC 302 (1952 to 1960) a hot rodders favorite. The GMC 302 shares the bore with the Ford 300(4" x 4"), the stroke of the Ford is 2 thousands less than the GMC. The aftermarket once produced alloy 12-port heads for the 302 GMC, the newer Ford 300 always had 12 ports. It almost seems as if Ford engineers were an admirer of the hot rod history of the GMC 302 and reproduced their own version just as GMC adopted a new truck v6. The GMC 302 was so popular that more than one 12-port aftermarket alloy head was manufactured, now highly prized by collectors. The 302 is a great nostalgia motor, and when modified is still pretty powerful.
@MitzvosGolem1
@MitzvosGolem1 3 ай бұрын
GMC had a 502 -6 . We had dump truck 1950s with a huge 6 .
@ratman5727
@ratman5727 3 ай бұрын
Interesting about the 302 GMC, I know the 300 Ford is smooth and stout. I would imagine that the GMC is similar, I am a V8 guy for max performance, but I have a soft-spot in my heart for inline sixes, they are a good example of perfect engineering. I have had a 258 GM, two 300 Fords, and now a 4.0 AMC, -all EXCELLENT engines, by ANY standards. The I-6 design will always get it done, -no matter what. Plain and simple.
@noduh736
@noduh736 2 ай бұрын
I've heard of all of them but I'm really into cars great episode tho
@marko7843
@marko7843 3 ай бұрын
I would bet that this diesel version was the smokey and slow engine I had in my school bus in the early 70s! It had the same front end as that semi-tractor you pictured. On the other hand, these GMC engines were much tougher to begin with then the Olds Rocket 350, and would have been an easier conversion to diesel... One question, why would a 60-degree V6 need a balance shaft?
@ratman5727
@ratman5727 3 ай бұрын
Did Adam say it was oversquare? I have seen 60 degree sixes run buttery smooth, -so it is a great question!
@marko7843
@marko7843 3 ай бұрын
@@ratman5727 I totally agree about so many engines that ran smoothly...
@marko7843
@marko7843 3 ай бұрын
DUDES, that is my point! A 60 degree V6 should be inherently smooth, ergo why did they put a balance shaft in that engine.?
@cbxsix
@cbxsix 3 ай бұрын
If you needed a ~150 hp diesel in 1964, I can't imagine picking one of these instead of a 4-71 Detroit - offered by the same corporation! Unless the price difference was extremely steep...
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
The problem probably was the weight difference.
@kc0lif
@kc0lif 3 ай бұрын
that's nice.
@charlesfitton9677
@charlesfitton9677 3 ай бұрын
My neighbour , Gig, an old trucker, said the twin 6 would pass anything but a gas station...
@wyldeparnelle955
@wyldeparnelle955 3 ай бұрын
I had a 1975 Monte and absolutely loved it other than it's lack luster performance. It was such a great car that I fully restored it in 1996 (rust had taken over) then finally sold it in 2002. I miss it a lot. 1978 to 1981 were meh, but 82 till it ended was nice. Then, my wife had the 2002 Monte Carlo SS Highsport. We had that for 10 years. Another beautiful car in Competition Yellow.
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
Omg yea, 78-81 was 🤮🤮🤮🤮
@michiganmotorsports
@michiganmotorsports 3 ай бұрын
Looks like the OG 348 design.
@user-of2kn6gw6e
@user-of2kn6gw6e Ай бұрын
My brother had an old red gmc 4x4 351 diesel on 40s back in the day! That thing was slow as fuck with the granny gears but man it would drag another truck through the mud hole like nobody’s business
@TheodoreScopeline
@TheodoreScopeline 3 ай бұрын
I had a 63' GMC pickup w a V6. Loved that old truck
@quincyq-radio6300
@quincyq-radio6300 3 ай бұрын
Cool 🤔👍🏾
@danbowen4083
@danbowen4083 3 ай бұрын
New Idea put both the gas and diesel versions in their Uniharvester on the agricultural side. The gas engines were known to catch fire because caff would build up.
@alexmason5668
@alexmason5668 3 ай бұрын
Being a ford guy hearing "351 V6" is definitely odd
@deltafreshrelics1660
@deltafreshrelics1660 3 ай бұрын
The 6.2 was a great engine. It really did go a long time when taken care of. Even the olds 5.7 could be solid when not in a vehicle. They made excellent irrigation power units. The 8.2 Detroit was an absolute turd. It’s a shame the olds stuff wasn’t better because we would have a different American car industry today had they been able to prove themselves. Us Americans seem to have an obsession power output stats but all my 6.2/6.5 equipped trucks have had a good seat of the pants feel to them. Last forever when used for their purpose. Very low cost of ownership compared to other diesels.
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
Those 6.2/6.5 get better fuel mileage than the Izuzu (Duramax) that replaced them.
@IowaBudgetRCBashers
@IowaBudgetRCBashers 3 ай бұрын
Toro flow may have only had 150-190 hp but they had 600 ft lb of torque
@sc1338
@sc1338 3 ай бұрын
I actually have the plaid valve covers for my 305c 😂. The thirfty V6 they called it
@chadbernasconi5880
@chadbernasconi5880 3 ай бұрын
That fired up easier then my new dd5
@mschiffel1
@mschiffel1 3 ай бұрын
Low HP numbers but big torque numbers.
@compu85
@compu85 3 ай бұрын
Neat to see they were using direct injection back then. That would've made them noisier, but more fuel efficient than the IDI designs used in the 350, etc diesel engines. Direct injection also puts less load on the cooling system. The 2 stroke Detroits are also direct injection.
@Hogger280
@Hogger280 3 ай бұрын
That is a misconception; IDI's were often noisier e.g. Ford 7.3 IDI, Cat 1673 and 1693
@compu85
@compu85 3 ай бұрын
@@Hogger280 VW and Mercedes picked swirlchamber / prechamber designs citing noise as a main reason.
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
​@@Hogger280100% Indirect sounds like they're trying to explode!! I think this guy is comparing with a direct injected 7.3 (Powerstroke) which is very noisey, due to the HEUI injectors. Direct injection is better in every single aspect, and does NOT produce more heat.
@johneckert1365
@johneckert1365 3 ай бұрын
​@@compu85No they didn't. Indirect injection diesels were produced because they would run on a much simpler fuel injection system. Less fuel pressure, but required much higher compression ratios. There's a reason why VW and Mercedes upgraded to direct injected decades ago.....
@compu85
@compu85 3 ай бұрын
@@johneckert1365 Have you read VW's paper to the SAE about their 1.5 diesel? It says swirl chambers (as opposed to prechambers or direct injection) was the easiest way to meet USA emissions requirements, while still getting good power from the engine. chopsauce.online.fr/doc/15dsae.pdf
@ivoryjohnson4662
@ivoryjohnson4662 3 ай бұрын
Now if they would of put a turbo or blower on it then it would of been a great engine
@noduh736
@noduh736 2 ай бұрын
Those Toro flos would probably be good intercooled and turbo and more fuel
@Greg-xv9qj
@Greg-xv9qj 3 ай бұрын
G m c gas v six lots of low end torque small stromberg 2 bbl carb spark plug location between intake manifold and valve cover and a sound that was like no other could hear it coming a block away!!
@fhwolthuis
@fhwolthuis 3 ай бұрын
9:12 I always wonder why the fans of some of these old engines are not symmetrical?
@isfeldt34
@isfeldt34 3 ай бұрын
Somebody who knows more than I can chime in, from what I read, they were also used in general motors coaches, the fishbowl.
@RacineGMCBusNut
@RacineGMCBusNut 3 ай бұрын
They were used in the 3300 model fishbowls. The 4500 and 5300 series used the 2 stroke Detroit.
@GeneralPoison
@GeneralPoison 3 ай бұрын
Following Steve Mags KZfaq channel I know alot (or at least all I need to know) about Toroflows!
@bradh7472
@bradh7472 3 ай бұрын
I always find this stuff so fascinating, but my question is always why did they produce so many odd low production, unknown engines? What was the point back then? Many mfg did this.
@NorlandBoxcar
@NorlandBoxcar 3 ай бұрын
Al I hear is the Monty Python album in my head from childhood saying: "Wankel Rotary Engine"
@nickdoessht
@nickdoessht 3 ай бұрын
Not sure I agree about the Detroit division not being able to help the design issue with the olds diesels. They seamed to figure out how to handle the increased compression and the injectors.
@67marlins
@67marlins 3 ай бұрын
Isn't it a testament to GMC engineering that they could build a successful diesel off an original gas design with minor modifications?
@Hogger280
@Hogger280 3 ай бұрын
It is a testament to laziness and penny pinching that they didn't do it right in the first place. GM was notorious for making a POS, getting a bad reputation, fixing the problems too late and losing the model after it was fixed - e.g. Corvair, Vega, 350 diesel. GM's 350 diesel was so bad that it ruined sales for other car companies because fickle buyers thought they were all bad!
@BillLaBrie
@BillLaBrie 3 ай бұрын
The Olds diesel would have been a success story with extra head bolts, a water separator, and a turbocharger. They knew how to do it: seemed cheaper not to.
@67marlins
@67marlins 3 ай бұрын
@@BillLaBrie Agreed. Many of the DX block cars are still running.
@Hogger280
@Hogger280 3 ай бұрын
@@BillLaBrie Turbocharging requires further strengthening, but yes could have been a great success if designed right the first time. Problem is they wanted a cheap POS and they designed one - could have been some pushback from Detroit Diesel division who didn't want any competition. GM did consider using the 4-53 in pickups and actually installed some and tested them. They were successful of course but they didn't like the noise.
@BillLaBrie
@BillLaBrie 3 ай бұрын
@@Hogger280 As I said, they knew the right way to do it, but chose a cheaper route. Cost more in the long run, and went a long way towards prejudicing Americans against passenger car diesels permanently. GM had the best engineers and even better accountants, so the accountants got to do the final engineering.
@4dirt2racer0
@4dirt2racer0 3 ай бұрын
..omfg i need one!... the motor around 1:05
@dalebelseth3058
@dalebelseth3058 3 ай бұрын
Is this a rerun?
@peterschoen7409
@peterschoen7409 3 ай бұрын
I do know that Pontiac nearly offered a hemi V-8 because Ed Cole wanted to drop the 6 pack from Pontiac because of environmental issues.
@joesutherland225
@joesutherland225 3 ай бұрын
Wonder how they'd respond to a turbo?
@Parents_of_Twins
@Parents_of_Twins 3 ай бұрын
I know a short run doesn't hurt them but it still bothers me when I see an engine started and running with no coolant flowing through it. So easy to drop a garden hose in there and keep it cool.
@TheodoreScopeline
@TheodoreScopeline 3 ай бұрын
64' Wildcat 401 2dr great interior/bench 80,000 mi all chrome good little rust needs body wrk runs drives great 10k obo
@samholdsworth420
@samholdsworth420 3 ай бұрын
I know about these because of steve mags
@markloubser2433
@markloubser2433 3 ай бұрын
I suspect toro-flow refers to the supposed torroidal flow pattern of the charge air due donut shaped piston crown?....
@CORVAIRWILD
@CORVAIRWILD 3 ай бұрын
1st spring is coming view!
@Parents_of_Twins
@Parents_of_Twins 3 ай бұрын
Anybody want to see what one of those gassers would do with a pair of turbos? Kind of curious what the diesels would do with some turbos? It's difficult to get any real hp out of an NA diesel. I had a 7.3 IDI Ford and it was like 180-185hp so not really that much better than what these were doing 20+ years earlier.
@stevelee5724
@stevelee5724 3 ай бұрын
The ecoboost v6 petrol stills runs divets in the pistons for the direct injection.....
@bradh7472
@bradh7472 3 ай бұрын
Sounds like an old Mercedes diesel in their cars back in the 80's. Other than straight exhaust.
@billmoran3219
@billmoran3219 3 ай бұрын
Thunderbolt Grease Slapper Is what it sounded like
@Parents_of_Twins
@Parents_of_Twins 3 ай бұрын
Very loud hardly does a Detroit justice. So loud it will tear a hole in spacetime gets a little closer.
@samleen
@samleen 2 күн бұрын
I’m guessing it’s called the toro flow because it has horns like a bull
Top 10 Strangest & Weirdest GM Car/Truck Engines You Never Heard Of!
30:40
Rare Classic Cars & Automotive History
Рет қаралды 144 М.
Worst Engines: GM's 8.2L / 500ci "Fuel Pincher" Detroit Diesel Pinched Its Owners' Pocketbooks
12:52
Rare Classic Cars & Automotive History
Рет қаралды 188 М.
She ruined my dominos! 😭 Cool train tool helps me #gadget
00:40
Go Gizmo!
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
🍕Пиццерия FNAF в реальной жизни #shorts
00:41
TRY NOT TO LAUGH 😂
00:56
Feinxy
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
What You May Not Know About Ford's 289
14:50
Wheelhouse
Рет қаралды 349 М.
Crazy Cold Start BIG old AIRPLANE ENGINES and LOUD Sound
5:27
Cars and Engines
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Fixing Every Common Problem with Toyota's Last V8 Engine
59:08
The Car Care Nut
Рет қаралды 175 М.
The ULTIMATE American V6 Engine Tier List
17:52
Running2Redline
Рет қаралды 102 М.
340 horsepower 3.6 LS 4 cylinder engine by Blue Print Engines
6:02
Automotive Antics
Рет қаралды 549 М.
The 1966-72 GMC 637ci 60-Degree V8 - GM's Largest On-Road V8 Is Virtually Unknown!
11:00
Rare Classic Cars & Automotive History
Рет қаралды 362 М.
The Most INDESTRUCTIBLE Engines EVER!
12:19
Dust Runners Automotive Journal
Рет қаралды 996 М.
Best Engines: GM Builds an Awesome V12 with Detroit Diesel's 12V71 "Buzzin' Dozen"
11:40
Rare Classic Cars & Automotive History
Рет қаралды 115 М.
Made in KZ?
4:18
Санжар Бокаев
Рет қаралды 76 М.
Почему ЗИЛ не спасли после развала СССР?😱
0:50
История в деталях
Рет қаралды 254 М.
3rd time’s a charm 😅 #bugatti #dodge #daytona #americanmuscle #muscle #musclecar
0:31