Professor Baden is always a pleasure to hear. Brilliant, clear, straightforward.
@DrVictorVasconcelos16 күн бұрын
He's all that but really he's also hilarious and I completely share his humor style.
@justmagicmostly8 ай бұрын
I'm a huge fan of Joel!
@josephtein38358 ай бұрын
He's very intelligent, articulate ... and funny!
@MrArdytube7 ай бұрын
Yes, this is a great lecture… not only from content…. But also from his engaging presentation
@sjd14466 ай бұрын
Please share the Q&A if you can. This is so interesting.
@bobstine37853 ай бұрын
Terrific! The Biblical approach of re-reading sounds appropriate for the US Constitution.
@SAMBUT7 ай бұрын
put that into my playlist, 'Untold History of the Bible' (content for truth seekers)
@mattlamson240Ай бұрын
PREACH! Ty Joel always love siempre
@robinmacallister65224 ай бұрын
Incredible! Excellent! Cleaning the stain of lgnorance upheld by blind faith.
@pausuansian18632 ай бұрын
👍
@user-tf9no4yb2n8 ай бұрын
Can you please ask rabbi Tovia to respond and let him challenge other people on this topic
@ron883036 ай бұрын
I believe Tovia has a YT channel; that would be a suitable place present his case ... as weak as it might be.
@john.premose5 ай бұрын
Lol, that utter crackpot?
@What_If_We_Tried3 ай бұрын
@@ron88303 Since R' Singer is an ardent apologist for rabbinic Judaism, he will probably always insist the Masoretic texts accurately reflect the original Hebrew autographs, that the Tanakh is inerrant, and is also univocal.
@Andrewcch745 ай бұрын
I don't understand why a church invited someone to share about the contradiction in the Bible which would contradict their beliefs
@What_If_We_Tried3 ай бұрын
Because these parishioners are probably more interested in verifiable facts, rather than doctrines, and dogmas built upon the concept that the bible is inerrant, and univocal.
@yohei722 ай бұрын
There are a lot of more liberal leaning churches that aren’t Biblical literalists.
@What_If_We_Tried2 ай бұрын
@@yohei72 Maybe in Europe, but the USA is ground zero for evangelicals / fundamentalists, and if you go 'Down South', you're in KJV only territory.
@yohei722 ай бұрын
@@What_If_We_TriedYes, even in America, though we’re certainly more fundamentalist than Europe.
@bill99892 ай бұрын
Pursuit of knowledge. Agree or disagree but don't close your mind.
@doyouknoworjustbelieve66949 күн бұрын
A book full of ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Canaanite and Greek myths and made up stories that contradict regional history and archeology is not of divine origin. Supremacy and calling for G side of others certainly does not help its claims of divine origin.
@DrMattDennisPsyPhD28 күн бұрын
Teaching people to mistrust God's letter sent to humankind. A spiritually blind guide, intellectualizing God's Word, in an expert's disguise. Like Israelite King Manasseh who misled God's people for decades, only to realize he had to repent, may God grant you the opening of the eyes, and His mercy when you'll return to Him.
@doyouknoworjustbelieve66949 күн бұрын
A book full of ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Canaanite and Greek myths and made up stories that contradict regional history and archeology is not of divine origin. Supremacy and calling for G side of others certainly does not help its claims of divine origin.
@richardprice97307 ай бұрын
A natural philosophy and adherent of biblical analysis which he is very good at but misses the point IT was edited in the light of supernatural insight in an attempt to draw people into the supernatural law of God which humans can only point at ,inconsistencies abound ,but they are correct Jesus is the alpha and omega supernaturally speaking .
@ron883036 ай бұрын
Earth calling richardprice; earth calling richardprice. Can you read me; over?
@richardprice97306 ай бұрын
@@ron88303 too many supernaturals but still the Bible in today's theological logical quasi scientific mind sets is like seeing a contoured map and ignoring or misreading them or just ignoring fine dotted footpaths ,the BIBLE is a spiritual text meant to inspire us to let go and trust in God's power more directly absolutely it isn't primarily a who did what when ,earthe is His footstool!
@john.premose5 ай бұрын
Ha ha ha ha ha. That's a really good old joke.
@martin22895 ай бұрын
@@richardprice9730 It's always amusing when people pontificate about the "supernatural" - something that has yet to be demonstrated even exists.
@yohei722 ай бұрын
By positing the supernatural, you can explain away literally anything. So it’s pretty useless as an explanation. It’s certainly unhelpful to doing history or any related discipline.
@carinabakewell23112 ай бұрын
Prideful Deconstructionist...
@yohei722 ай бұрын
Whiny, willfully ignorant fundamentalist.
@Exjewatlarge2 ай бұрын
Self-certain inerrantist…
@DC-cg2jp2 ай бұрын
Hard to take this guys serious, a whole lot of talking but no valuable information that actually leads to the truth. I guess that’s the foundation of Gnosticism. “We know what didn’t happen but we have no clue what actually did happen.” K.
@andrereginato35388 ай бұрын
Interesting that he quotes manuscripts from Eastern history having similarities to Jewish manuscripts. The bible makes it clear that God chose a people to reveal himself to and our scriptural history comes from Judaism not Eastern teachings. Another attempt to doubt the word God as being all authority and accepting different cultural beliefs. His teaching will only lead to universalism which means that we can accept any cultural belief and a belief in many deities or God's. No mention of Jesus Christ...as Paul said, many false teachers and prophets will appear and if possible, deceive even the elect. Remember Jesus said I am the way, the truth and the life and no one will come unto father but through him only. Any other way is like a thief and a robber. BEWARE of false teachers.
@psuswim078 ай бұрын
His point wasn’t just to point out similarities between many stories in the Hebrew Bible and myths that came before, but to show that they were the INSPIRATION for the stories found in the Old Testament, and that in fact many are copied almost verbatim into the OT (Moses’s auspicious birth, the flood, etc.) His point is that the history of the scriptures is partly that they’re adapted retellings of much older stories. And there’s no mention of Jesus because this talk was specific to the Old Testament and Judaism, so obvious Jesus wouldn’t be relevant.
@davidhemphill37358 ай бұрын
He is talking about context - ancient near eastern context. It was the bath water that the narratives were written in. we have the same going on right now. read Dr. Michael Heiser to get some current context about how to read ancient narratives. Nothing wrong with what he is talking about AND being a believer. Context is king. He is not a false teacher.
@mattandkim178 ай бұрын
Joel makes a lot of sense actually.
@hailemaryam11748 ай бұрын
Are you people so deaf that you don't hear him saying that the Bible is a false text if one is looking for truth?
@davidhemphill37358 ай бұрын
we can still agree/enjoy his views on ANE world and his findings on the same, while filtering out what does not agree with our personal and Biblical beliefs. @@hailemaryam1174