@Isak Ahmed sorry I forgot

And it was a fair match too... New Zealand were playing finals to win an ICC trophy after more that a dozen years and won it sportingly, not celebrating much.

It was very heartbreaking

best student in class never tops anyways...

@@sourav3958 99 ka world Cup semifinal dekho vo aur bhi dangerously heartbreaking tha.

Bcz south Africa team first time included in mega tournament that's why they didn't want to upset ICC so they don't argue

You can't selectively protest. Before Semi Final, SA defeated Pakistan with same rule and they were happy.

Also if you want to protest against some rule you should do it before tournament. By participating you are acknowledging that submit to the rules, and the rule was changed after that match.

@@zainsohail6733 tbh mate 10-15 minutes on tele costs millions

And yet their captain was later banned for match-fixing so at that time there was a lot of dodgy stuff going on.

You sir are a imbecile of the highest quality.

Yeah it would have still happened.

Rules and rules. Same would apply for Australia. South Africa shouldn’t have chose to field

It would have been applied just the same. The old rain rule and later the D/L method favours no team

Whinging POM alert, lost your spirit boy?

It's Australian network that killed the spirit of the game and ICC even agreed to let them do this.RSA deserved to be in the finals .

And with such an unfortunate start, SA cricket is still struggling to reach Finals.

Imagine RSA did win that WC! Just how epic it would have been!

Though I am an Indian... I love to see south africa winning... I think leadership costs all....

@@bibekdas7449 that means beating pakistan in the finals ... nice ;-)

New Zealand is also a candidate

@@drifttohell newzealad is.

Also had the most fixers after Pakistan

They are fighters, legends and "the most gentlemen team" ever !!!!

@V Mohankumar Cronje was definitely no legend, he was a match-fixing cheat and admitted it. It was sad the way he died, but he was a shame on all cricket.

They did not lose, not weaker either. Get your facts right. They were winning the semi final to qualify in for finals against Australia.

@@nonkey5042 Comparing to England, they were quite weak team

Whatever happened with sa was wrong but what happened in pak vs sa 1992 wc match can you tell me

​@@MindfulMomentsMMno we were not weaker. We would have beaten them.

No

He's eloquent but if he had a native English accent, then you would be great

@@pranav_k__ hey, who allowed noobs in here?

@@prasana_v if his accent was better it would've been more fun

So true.

Nz no longer chokers

It wasn't a corrupt system, just mistaken. It was brought in because the old rain rule (just net run rate) massively favoured the chasing team.

@@CA-ee1et taking a decision like that, because your sponsors have a time limit, is not corrupt? It was no mistake.

And they were against England both the time :-/

What happened that day with South Africa is pure corruption, yes But what happened in 2019 was certainly not corrupt, just bad deciesion making by the umpires....

Hansie was the biggest cheat the game has ever seen, I don't miss him at all.

Indians and South Africans are brothers Edit thanks for the likes

Thank you bro we must preserve our beautiful sport cricket

@@gamerz3088 Yep

I'm from the UK but South Africa have produced some of my all time favourite cricketers over the years. Watching Donald send down thunderbolts was a spectacle to behold. Some amazing characters after readmission into test cricket in Fanie De Villiers, Big Bri Mac, Jonty Rhodes and Pat Symcox. I was gutted with what became of Hansie as he'd carried on what Wessels so impressively started. Graeme Smith, Herschelle Gibbs, Gary Kirsten, Jacques Kallis, AB DeVilliers, Hashim Amla, Shaun Pollock, Vernon Philander, Dale Steyn, Mark Boucher, Morne Morkel, KG Rabada - all deserve mention for their wonderful contributions to the game as entertainers. Makhaya Ntini deserves special mention for his attitude and pride alone. Covered miles in the field in every match he played and could always be heard over the crowd shouting from the boundary 'Come on boys, let them know where you came from!' The guy had fire in his belly and was always up for a scrap. England have benefitted from some excellent South African cricketers over the years from Greig, Lamb, Smith, Pietersen, Trott, Strauss and Prior. I bet Dean Elgar wouldn't mind Devon Conway in his current Test XI given the start he's made for NZ!

@@simulacra007 thank you :)

BTC hits another bearish cost as individuals expanded their offers in order to make immense addition from the ascent however as we would all be able to see now the market is truly insecure , truly you can generally make more benefit from tradn instead of just hodlin and sitting tight at the cost of BTCto soar . Surely its an extreme choice for both old and beginners whose intensions are simply to hodl and sell yet rather the possibilities of tradnBtc would permit you develop yourBtc not disapproving of the current value graph and furthermore saving your butt from any future profound that may happen . I began tradn with Daniel Wright since toward the end of last year and till date have made over 16Btc even with the high points and low points since the excursion. With Michael's assistance I presently don't need to stress over the ascent and plunge ofBitcoin, you can without much of a stretch get to Daniel on Եҽlҽցɾαต (@Danielwrightfx...

Couldn’t agree more.. I was blaming DLS all these years incorrectly. Thanks for telling us this hurting yet interesting story.

@BOSSWTB GAMING after that match south africa began choking at finals and semis. The effect of 1992 wc is still there.

This is half the story mate. This incorrect information.. it's just to gain views..

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gZtmqrl6q83Pfmw.html

@@brajeshsingh2391 ohh Mr. British 🙄

@@brajeshsingh2391 If the law makes the game so unfair then it needs adjustment.

@@brajeshsingh2391 it's wasn't dls method used there. It's Most Productive Overs Method. That ruined the game. DLS was introduced in the 1997.

@@brajeshsingh2391 chup saala Lodu jaisa baat mat kar Unfair hai toh hai Apna tatti gyan baap ko do jaake

As a indian you should be ashamed of cheating of Indian cricket team 😅

😔

But these rules were agreed by all the nations BEFORE the tournament even began.How is that corrupt?

@@zargonthemagnificent330 did they have a choice? No.. if they wanted to play, they had to agree to the terms..

@@afnanalam4812 Well of course, that's the case for most things, not just sport. I don't see your point - how can this be "corrupt" when everyone knew the tournament rules before they played. Corruption means the was something illegal going on, but there wasn't. It MAY be considered unfair, but that's not the same as corruption.

@@zargonthemagnificent330 no buddy... Corruption has a much wider definition... It includes not just illegal or criminal activities but also unethical and immoral practices..

Pakistan won coz they deserved...you can say that SA deserved to be in finals!!!

Instead of would or should, the reality on the ground, Pakistan WON, and rightfully so, the under dog of the tournament !!!

Sa 'deserved' every world cup but they are chokers and chokers are they.

Yep they did deserve

@@uzairkhalid7121 I'm sorry SA had the best team in that world cup they would have won if it was fair

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sNBoq8ensKrRgYE.html

True

Yeah me too ....but on shit pot 🤣

Yeah!! I was superglued

Fr

You mean DLS?

@@pruthweeshasalian3688 yes my bad..typo error

@@mohsinattar8112 yp

@@pruthweeshasalian3688 Duckworth lewis stern methos

@@sumeetghai8867 Yes, I know. OP's original comment said DRS instead of DLS.

Hope you enjoyed it brother.

@@cricketraazenglish good job mate fantastic video, very engaging

@@cricketraazenglish congrats on 1.5 million views, you must be so happy :)

in both cases benificiary was England

Yes the stoopid rule they used in 2019 world cup. who ever got the highest bound ries were the winner even a kid would know thatsbunfair

@@summaiyafatima571,good observation

@@potatoesaregood2077 all captains were made aware of this rule before the the WC 2019 no one opposed it as no one thought that a match could get tied and then super over could also get tied

Its unfair from every angle... At the end of the day, how does it matter if you score runs by singles or boundaries... same score means both have played equally good. Its stupidity to consider one team as winners bcz the other team has scored runs in boundaries. On the other hand, 6xers and 4 are considered as same and thats even more ridiculous. Mathematically 2 6xers make 12 runs and 3 4s make 12 runs... based on this , WC finals shouĺd have been a TIE bcz NZ scored more 6xers and that didnt happen bcz of morons making the rules who couldnt use a bit of cricketing wisdom. Also all the cricketing pundits couldnt say anything of such rules before the world cup. Isnt that wierd as well??

It will happen, one day in the coming years South Africa 🇿🇦 will lift the WC trophy. The team deserves it, 1999’s side deserves it. Rhodes, Cullinan, Klusener, Pollock, Kallis, Alan Donald and countless cricketing legends deserve it. The 1992 side that was wronged in the semis Vs England due to shitty broadcaster rules deserves it. Man I can count dozens of reasons why SA deserves to lift that WC championship trophy, and they will. ✨✨✨

You know, Sachin waited at least 3 world cup tournaments to reach it. Believe that history will always do the payback. That's karma. The whole nation, India, gone to tears when ABD cried on the ground. It shows how much everybody wants SA to win the WC.

Lol ur youtube content tell where u are from lmao stop this for getting likes

@WHY I'M kartik 🙌

@@Mohit-ne1tx Bro he just stated the Conscious feelings of South Africans , he never said he belongs from South Africa , Idk from where do you guys come up with this sort of nonsensical perceptions

What happened

@@20_mihir48 Watch the goddamn video.

The main problem with this video is that it starts with a narrative, that greed ruined the match, then uses genuine facts interspersed with half truths and speculation bordering on lies in order to paint the narrative. This match was highly controversial and worthy of review however to get closer to the truth we need access to the playing conditions that existed in 1992 World Cup. Unfortunately I have not been able to access the specific playing conditions for this tournament and I suggest that Cricket Raaz has also not viewed them for a number of reasons. I will endeavour to make it clear when I am using known facts and when I am making assumptions as a result of not having access to the playing conditions. The video accused the Australian Cricket Board of handing over control of crucial playing conditions such as match timing to channel 9. Whilst it is true that the host nation officially writes the playing conditions it is in actuality an agreement between two boards in a bilateral tournament and by all boards in a multilateral tournament such as the World Cup. So for channel 9 to dictate the particular playing conditions they would have to coerce all the national boards. The video implies that there was no allowance made to extend the match yet fails to acknowledge that the original schedule had been extended. The first session was extended from 1800 to 1810, the interval was reduced by 10 minutes and the second session was extended from 2200 to 2210. I contend that there was no allowance to extend beyond the already extended time. We need to see the playing conditions for the tournament in order to determine if that is correct. I suggest that if this did contravene the playing conditions it would have resulted in an almighty furore and an official investigation into why the playing conditions were ignored. The video contends that channel 9 refused for the reserve day to be used. It is my recollection that once 25 overs have been bowled in the second innings then the match would not use a reserve day as sufficient overs had been bowled to allow a result. Therefore, I believe, channel 9 could not have refused the use of a reserve day as it was the playing conditions of the tournament as agreed by all participants. The video stipulates that the “rain rule” was devised by channel 9. Firstly it was not called the rain rule it was called the Most Productive Over (MPO) method. Prior to this tournament the Average run rate rule was used to determine the revised target in the event of rain delays and it had proved to be inadequate on many occasions. Therefore a panel of experts headed by the late great Richie Benaud were tasked with devising a new method. However, the rationale of this method was based on stoppages occurring during the interval, so that if Team 2 lost say 25 overs, then their target was derived from the 25 most productive overs in Team 1’s innings, irrespective of when the overs were lost. So if the stoppage was in the latter part of Team 2’s innings it often gave a grossly unfair target. Unfortunately this method was also not fit for purpose, that led to the introduction of the Duckworth Lewis method. I can see no reason for channel 9 to get involved in this revised target calculation as it would serve zero commercial value to them. It is simply a method of determining what score needs to be achieved if the overs are reduced. I am willing to be proved incorrect if there is evidence that the playing conditions as they stood in 1992 were deliberately violated and that it was channel 9 that instigated the violation.

Boo hoo, they lost cos they batted too safe , end of story

Dude that was Richie Benaud

Dude those people doesnt care who they do it too all they care is about money.This broadcaster's really made me anoyed

@@prabnids was the man that made the rule?

And then bowler should have bowled a beamer on mid stump of of that man 😂😂

almost died laughing 😃😃 🤣🤣 reading this

Imagine dhoni being told this for his Runout & Rohit too for 0 runs.......

@@sunny24t imagine your parents being scolded for you to be born

Kohli would have kicked their asses

@@MonkeyFrieza hey what about your parents too😂

What is a slang?

Why dislikes aren't get any count on Comments?😅😅😅

Stupid rules of NRR too! Pak missed out

@@danyalparacha1761 Yeah being a Pakistani that was so heart breaking💔

Absolutely

@@danyalparacha1761 ok then suggest a rule where between both the team having same points on table one can be qualified for the knockouts??

Because it came from the hand of the much-respected Richie Benaud.

It was such a dumb rule. It negates the best overs of the Bowling team. It's like you are penalized for bowling well. Dumbest rule in History.

It follows statistical ‘best practice’. Removing the one highest AND the one lowest scoring over, is not unusual in statistical analysis.

@@jeremyreid9582 best practice would be Reduce Balls & Runs based on Required Run Rate. How is "22 off 13 Balls" changed to "22 off 1 Ball" a fair deal in any world? Makes no sense at all.

@@BharaniNath agreed. But when Proteas lost this game Duckworth Lewis had yet to be developed - the South Africans developed the system as a result of this infamous match. The Duchworth Lewis system is based on the analysis of thousands on ODI matches and the application of statistical science.

Don't forget , WC2019 Final

Yes. That too

After wcc2019 rule was changed super over rule was removed

@@pravinchauhan7875 the out of Ross Taylor was not out but he had no review left.mistake of boult and umpire giving 6 runs instead of 5 made England win

@@SalmanKhan-eu2mp Yes, however Stokes has said it himself he would have tried to hit the boundary of that ball if it had been 3 to win and who knows what would have happened then

south african cricket board has gone to shit since they introduced some weird quota based off of race edit - change your channel name ffs

Arre bhai aap bs driving sikhlo kb tk footpath pr chalaoge@😂

If AB DE VILLIERS present in T20 world cup they can if not means no chance for them.. Actually quota system aruined ABDEVILLIERS life🥺😭.. MY CHAMP💔

@@abhiteshparihar1612 Eh?

@@sagnik3556 Eh?

Cricket is not for entertainment ITS WASTE of tym please don't give attention them...

NZ wasn't deprived of WC because of any absurd rule. When the rule was created for most boundaries, every team captain agreed upon it and there was no opposition to the idea. And it was extremely unlikely that a match be tied and then super over be tied as well. Every team captain had to take responsibility for not criticizing this rule when it was conveyed. There was a vote for it as well and everyone signed. 1992 rules were outrageous and were criticized even before WC had begun and even Australians were against it but consensus wasn't an option then. It was there in 2019 case. Stop feeling sorry for NZ. As Indians we have a soft corner for NZ and SA players and general hatred towards Aus and England. It creates bias. ICC were completely dominated by the sheer wave of social media criticism led by Indians and Aussies that they had to change the rule completely. Personally I didn't like the rule, but the uproar was out of proportion. England won NZ lost and NZ were partly responsible for that.

Bro. This is incorrect information uploaded.. or half facts presented of this match by the uploader to gain views.

@@ThankYouGoogle4 Agreed. It was a stupid rule, and none of the captains should've accepted it, however unlikely the situation looked at the time. But one could also argue that NZ were deprived of the world cup, because the overthrow that went to the boundary, should've fetched five runs instead of six. Plus, Ben Stokes should've been on the non strikers end for the next ball.

Suman sharma U are right England get the advantage both of time

You forgot 2003: Not knowing the difference between par score and winning score

Good days for South Africa is coming broda...

@Isak Ahmed Yes you are correct, my bad

wrong about 2011 bro. As a team SA was not good, but AB was a beast in 2011. In 2011-12, AB rarely/never got out by bowled or lbw or stumped, he got out by runout or getting caught alone (i.e. the bowlers could not deceive him) In 2011 World Cup, SA batting was heavily dependent on AB and he delivered. In first 2 mathes he scored 107 and 134. they lost third match vs Eng and 4th match vs India he again scored a quick 52 of 39 and SA was in the quarters, the next 2 matches SA rested AB. In the quarters, AB was going well, they needed 100 from 21 overs. And he was RUNOUT (the only way to make AB out those days) So, i beielve 2011 also, SA was unlucky

@Isak Ahmed yeah obvious, 2015 was the best chance they had in winning the world cup. I never said they were bad.

Yes they are true champions and true legends 😭

I remember listening to this on the radio in England. We didn't have Sky television. Still don't.

Nah Pakistan's team was a bit more ferocious so South Africa would have had no chance

Oh and I am Indian So dont think I am a biased Pakistani fan if you know the rift between India and Pakistan

Pakistan were champions

It will never will with these silly rules.

@@siddharthak6700 haha, that's why eng won their 1st 50 ov wc in 2019!

@@invisiblevoice7820 Siddharth seems like one of the five blind men figuring out the elephant..

@@invisiblevoice7820 lol

@@invisiblevoice7820 he is talking in terms of financial power and decision making

😂😂

Saddest day? It is only a limited overs game. It is just for fun, it isn’t serious cricket.

Its very unfortunate!

Yes bro

You guys should have won the 2019 CWC

The trouble is though this match may have been a farce leaving South Africa needing 22 off 1 ball , but it changed the way ODI cricket was played FOREVER and with out this match we may have still been playing cricket under the same rules today and never had the DWLS method for calculating rain delays in white ball cricket …

5 yrs old but still remembering that match. Really a great memory power.

@@senthilkumar803 ha ha.. I remember coz I was casually munching on some capsules I found while watching the match and had to be taken to the hospital....

Sandpaper: Allow me to introduce myself...

@@divyaakashdutta4038 kohli : hold my middle finger

@@divyaakashdutta4038 Can we get past this? A lot of teams have cheated before. Let's just enjoy the game without such negative banter

@@Hypersp4ce cheating is purely positive banter. 🤗

@@divyaakashdutta4038 Steve Smith :hold mt stats

Also quality fixing

@@Gunturvinu forgive him for his one mistake. He was a legend and I still repect him a great captain.

@@faheemakbar1281 When you are a captain or a head , there's a minimum integrity people need to show.He was always a cheat.Please dont glorify these traitors brother.We South Africans hate him absolutely.

@@Gunturvinu I can understand you bro. Fixing cannot be defended. I realy feel bad for him some time. He would be hero for you guys if he wasnt a cheater.

@@Gunturvinu I completely agree with you

at least in that case there was involved a rule that is associated with cricket however absurd.But 1992 one was on a different level all together.

In both the case, Eng was opponent. was it coincidence ?

@@sakthidhanapal4956 how tf would someone making a rain rule predict which team would be chasing and which one will bat first ? It was sheer coincidence that England benefitted .. plz apply some brain

@@sakthidhanapal4956 and also how could someone predict rain and how it would benefit England as you were implying ? clown moment 🤡

The legend anil kumble was the one who suggested that rule

And the broadcasting company is the one who owns the stumps and bat😂😂😂

@@Sakura-bs1rk 😂😂😂😂

@@Sakura-bs1rk 😂😂

@@Sakura-bs1rk and If the ball gets lost or if that ball is kept by an angry uncle! .. Then that's the rain! 😂...

😔❤️😂🤦🏻‍♂️🙏

Well this wasn't the only bad moment for SA cricket. Such moments keep coming to them. 1999 wc semifinal run out 2007 wc semifinal 2015 wc semifinal when grant elliot hit a winning six with 1 ball left And recently 2022 t20 wc defeat against Nederlands

​@@AmitKumar-nq7wknow the overcast conditions in eden gardens cost them😢, south Africa always unlucky with the rain stuff

@@luffy64190 well bavuma won the toss but he batted first in those conditions. Can't blame luck this time

@@AmitKumar-nq7wk i know that but if you watched the cwc bavuma had no option because chokes badly in chasing. and during the toss the conditions were slightly better when match started more dark clouds came and rain came after 14 overs too

england loses that world cup pakistan won that wc

England never won an international WC in a long time and theres BCCI who prevent Cricket becoming an olympic sport

Yup they cheated New Zealand 2 years ago as well

@@ehsanullah2325 Are you commenting from under the rocks? England literally won Cricket WC last time.

@@ehsanullah2325 And the same cheating thing happened in the recent Euro too, look how they cheated Denmark out of the final but I guess justice was served at the end.

Exactly, glad someone else has pointed out the obvious. SA did not deserve all the sympathy they got.

Wow, all the love from Indian fans is humbling

@@fomofud9479 that Lance klusener , Alan Donald runout broke our hearts for years.

@@fomofud9479 Because we love cricket . And we believe that the south africa is one of the most connected country with India . Love from India brother . 🙏

@@kimselmonun7312 thank you 🙏

But not during apartheid era, of course. They were rightly hated then.

I was so hurt when i saw that damn frame. Painful to watch.

@@cricketraazenglish who is he?

11:52

@@samueldavid1104 whats his name?

@@AAAqwerty Alan Donald

🙏

How many times will you bark gabba this is why india lost they are so overreacting peoples.

@@Dontknowhoiam true af

@@Dontknowhoiam india dont bark. You bark. We are pure humans.

@@Dontknowhoiam Yes you are correct but I was talking about your media and your team's thinking that they are best in the world. Do you remember in 2018 Australian media were saying that in absence of Warner and Smith only India can win Series, Now come to 2020 how many players of our team got injury?? And fun fact Smith and Warner are there 😉😉

Rubbish, how do you know they would have won in the final.

@@paulcarew593 How do you know they wouldn't?

@@somaniaakash03 Yes but the person who makes the first statement is saying it as a fact that they "would have been WC champs if not for this". First of all, you seem to think that S.A would have definitely won this semi-final game when they still had a lot to do and then you seem to be certain that they would have won the final. He also talks about Duckworth/Lewis when it is a FACT that this method was not in use in 1992.

@@somaniaakash03 they cant win because in final. They have 2 face with imran tigers...

@@sheikhfarzad3962 we had Jonty Rhodes flying at the stumps. We beat pak earlier on

the one that literally made me cry was a semi final of 99, and i am not even frm south Africa... Lance klusner was the biggest star here in Pakistan ♥️

@@WaqarAhmed-ec5xp one of many heart breaking moments. Most world cups have those type of memories with 99 and 03 being up there....

@@sneakpeak0000 yess... i still cant get over the fact that they decided by R.R in a freaking semi final...

cricket is gradually fading in SA due to ineffectiveness of icc

@@pikachuthunderbolt3919 its more due to the quota system in which players to be chosen based on races

Naah. You can actually say its single handedly saving cricket

Chup re pakistani. Khud hate hai aur rrararra karte hai😂

DLS is the most confusing and stupid rule ever made

@@NishanthNair7 They didn't use DLS method in this match. The unfair rules which I was referring to was the time limit imposed by the broadcasters, along with the most productive overs method, which was totally unfair.

Icc owes some teams an apology..

They reduced balls so why not no of runs???

@@randoms6586 because they removed maiden overs that means 0 runs

Cicket kee rules ajj bhi ase hii ajibo garib

I find it cute when foreigners mispronounce our names with their native accents. And I make fun of and look down condescendingly at my own when they mispronounce English words. Its my colonial complex.

Rules Matlab rules Follow na kare te fools Fools go back to schools... 🤣🤣🤣 Love Wagle ki Duniya...🤣