Yes, the Diesel is not dead according to the websites.

Until EV and Hydrogen range catches up, the diesel industry woll always have a place im commercial shipping.

I can see a temporary phase out of fossil fuels in 2030 or so but fossil fuels would probably make a huge comeback very soon after.

Yes. You can't beat the power of a diesel.

Also, do a video on the Ford V8 4.6

Wonder if they had pleasant smelling exhausts

@@thejosh0100 I assume. If you burn waste oil from McDonald's it smells like french fries, I've been told, so I assume peanut oil smells like peanuts

As long as it’s based off Rudolph diesels compression ignition. If it’s not Compression ignition then it’s not a diesel.

@@Amigafur it's called the Diesel Cycle.

You're right they burned all kinds of stuff back in the day including kerosene

Can you fix the Def treatment breakdowns that occur far too often? I like Cummins, but I'll get a Detroit if they can't get serious.

Fake

@@johncuervo3019 Alrigh John, no more tequila for you. Now spit that worm out, & go have a sandwich....

@@nostradamus7648 that should be under warranty if you're having an issue.

awesome!

Pretty sure it would keep you in business. I doubt the learning curve would be large considering fundamentally it still functions like a gas engine. If I were to guess I’d say the learning curve would be a bit steeper than when fuel injection came out.

One thing I'm worried about... Is the question of will it kill our jobs, or give us a hell of a lot more complications to work with 🤣 may be job security.

Im hoping Porsches investments into biofuel are advancing with the upmost of speed and progress

Thanks for your comment, Tony. Biofuels are a viable option, but food politics and poor chemical stability may be a problem. I think that various alternative fuels for diesel engines should be researched. Hydrogen, e-fuel, NH3, etc.

Toyota has the hydrogen vehicle that runs on Bull Sh@t that is not talked about enough.

Toyotas hydrogen engine is just a step in progress through a prototype. No need to harshly criticize it.

@@tony_5156 biofuel is another ponzi scheme to help out mega agricorp like monsanto. anytime you grow food for fuel its a total waste. hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe.

gas engines convert just as easy

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gNuohK92qcnHo4k.html

@@MarkAlanKing no not even close gas engines aren't anywhere near as strong they tried it with the gm's 350 engines and a bunch of others because who knew you'd crack heads and destroy a crank or block from compression alone most factory gas engines have anywhere from 8.5:1-10.5:1 compression ratios most diesels have 14-20+ the webbing in the castings of a gas engines main component's let alone everything else isn't designed for anything diesel like and are way more prone to detonation to to the fuel temperatures being extremely higher then the gas counterpart the list goes on

@@in-rust-we-trust2831 work just fine and inventors have lost their lives over it

@@in-rust-we-trust2831 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gNuohK92qcnHo4k.html

If you're from Michigan I would keep that information to your self they are coming down hard on diesel delete and other devices

Not if the government has something to say about it! 😂

@@jmreg7391 the government works for industry owners

@@lunatik9696 That’s what I try to tell folks. This EV pony show is more about lining certain people’s pockets than saving the planet. We’re obviously beyond the point of being able to do anything meaningful to save the environment and stop global warming. No turning back now but by golly let’s make Elon Musk richer in our last 100 years.

Agree let the energy roll what ever it is let the people decide on what they want elec for the city folks 200 mile radius those upper mid west need all forms same w across the top of our USA solar where the sun shines gas wher that is along the coast oil we need that for plastics vinyl flooring ect ect I think the hybrid technology is the way for know like Cali if all electric but u can’t supply that demand know what blackouts ?

@@jmreg7391 it’s the people that are saying by the number of deaths due to vehicle pollution which is massive 😮

I found it biased. Going to talk about infrastructure for electric vehicles, but not hydrogen... Seriously there is like zero hydrogen infrastructure. I want both to succeed yet there are really no benefits of hydrogen especially as battery technology continues to get better. Storing it is the biggest issue. It takes too much volume. Real Engineering did a perfect episode on how hydrogen takes so much space that it literally makes little sense. It doesn't give more power. It takes too much space. Requires incredibly low pressure and tempatures to make it even close to not taking enough space. Costs electricity to create. Where are the benefits outside of novelty? There are better ways to do things. Unless we make some real break throughs in generating it. Like a mobile hydrogen generator that you can use anywhere there is water that is powered by the sun? It makes legit no sense. Someone needs to help me. What am I missing?

5 to 10 what , days , weeks, hours

Decades

Seconds..No I would imagine it's minutes.I will never buy a bumper car.( dodgems)

@@royalcrowntowing2464 Sorry Minutes :)

This problem has already been solved by the Nissan Leaf . A Tokyo taxi company installed an automated battery charger to change their batteries in about the same time it takes you to fill a tank of gas.. Modular batteries - 'T size ' , as in Truck..

Yes JCB should get more publicity for the vehicles they have converted to hydrogen.

Why would they loose 40% of their power trough electrolysis to make hydrogen when they can sell their power directly. How cheap is hydrogen going to be if customer have to pay for all that loss?

@@TJPDmember The Japanese are using nuke power to super heat water to separate it into hydrogen and oxygen.

nuclear power plants produce tonnes of hydrogen when they melt down, I hear the russians had shitloads in 1986 and the Japanese still have heaps LMAO

@@TJPDmember power plants make excess a lot of the time, they need to maintain a base load, previous designs have seen them have to bleed off the power, this would mean they can use that spare base load power to generate hydrogen at almost no cost to them...

While Nuke power is clean (basically a STEAM generator), its byproducts are the problem. Nuclear waste is difficult to handle, COSTLY to dispose of, and then there are those 'PESKY' security problems because TERRORISTS want to gettheir hands on radioactive ANYTHING... and then there is the POLITICS and RED TAPE. Remember, our government is here to help us. ;-}

Gas and oil corps using they’re corruption quickly squashed that

And where will you grow all this hemp ? People are building crappy sub-divisions all over farm land.

@@mattywho8485 So corn farmers, wheat, farmers, soy bean farmers can switch over if they want. There’s plenty of agricultural land still available in the us.

@@mattywho8485if there’s a market for hemp lots of people will grow it, I saw rural Nevada explode with hemp farms after the act legalizing them was passed, everyone and their dog started growing hemp, however the next season it all disappeared because there wasn’t a market for the hemp.

Multifuel engines are not efficient! They're multifuel because there may not be a certain fuel avalible and the supplies need to flow!

Pneumatics

If pressurized Hydrogen is half as dense that is not a big deal.

@@gregkramer5588 explain your thought

It is but it has to happen

It is not as big of a deal as you are imagining. You simply need larger tanks to make up for the volume. Other issues are a bigger deal like hydrogen embrittlement, producing green hydrogen and a non existent transport system. All solvable problems with current technology. What we are missing is the will to do it. To many other competing interest.

Don't know where you get your information, most trucks have standard transmissions (8 to 18 speed) that get power to the ground via the drive line(s).

Or did you mean are not set up?

Most companies install APUs (auxiliary power units). These are small diesel engines that provide heat, AC and electrical power so the driver does not need to idle the truck to be comfortable.

Look at the size and fuel consumption of a locomotive, yes i know a tractor and trailer are much smaller, but the combined weight of the components would probably leave little left for freight, which would increase the number of those trucks required to haul the same amount of freight, increase the number of tires for those trucks, and fuel for them, and increase shipping costs as well. Probably erasing any advantage

Too heavy. Payload pays. Dead weight does not.

I keeping my 8v92 2 stroke turbo and just bough 6 gallons of BRP XD-100 2 stroke oil to keep going. Thanks

yeah 🖕’em🤨🤣

@Matt Carden I love your music list fruitcake. Let me pull my cock out of your mom's asshole little 🤡🤡🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡💩💩💩👌👌👌👌 see I got emojis to loser

@Matt Carden You got to be a slow adult or a stupid kid to have a music list like yours. Go back to playing video games in Mommy's basement and listen to your little gay music. You should make your list private so nobody could see it dummy🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻

@Matt Carden the dude has Coldplay on his music list. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡💩

Heard same thing from well read construction project manager. He too said 30 years. Must be something they can calculate to the year.

DANG!

I'd bet a large sum of money that it would take at least 45-50 years.

Ask anyone in the Biden regime. Tomorrow is the date they would use 👿

Actually this is not true. I replaced my 20 KW electric furnace with a 4 KW heat pump. So with that savings, I can plug in my electric car. If you just reduce your HVAC use by a little bit, you can have a net savings on your electric bill each month. Anyone who has owned and plugged in a home charger for their EV knows how in-expensive they are to run them. The electric company energy planners in the 1970's and 1980's had a difficult time with the new portable window A/C units that all tend to run noon to 7 pm every day. That gave them a headache. Overnight power at 9.6 KW for a EV charger is no problem at all! And in 3-4 hours, you can fully charge your car or pickup at home. The Ford F-150 uses about the most power per mile, at about 2-3 miles per KW of power. Well the Hummer EV is a little more power. So lets say you drive 30 miles a day, and need to put in 10 KW to your F-150. Or 90 miles and need to put in 30 KW. That will take 1-3 hours with a 9.6 KW charger that draws about 32 amps at 240 volts. Your air conditioner uses about 1/2 that amount of power, so it really is not that much stress on the grid system, considering you only need to charge overnight, when demand is low. And you would typically run the A/C more than 3 hours on a hot day. A Tesla car is about 4 miles per KW of power. So driving even 100 miles in one day, that would be 25 KW or about 5 hours with a 5 KW charger between midnight and 5 am. That would be about 20 amps X 240 volts. Or about what a 1970's 2 ton air conditioner would use. But you would typically use the air conditioner more than 5 hours per day, and mostly between noon and 9 pm, when others are also using a peak amount of power.

The problem with the CNG engines is their spark ignition system. That is their primary issue, secondary issue is the problem of them having condensation in the crankcase, which can cause many oil lubrication issues down the road.

The City of Long Beach California has been running over 100 of the CNG diesel engines that run on 90% CNG for most of they day, when they run out of CNG, they switch back to 100% diesel fuel. They are started with both glow plugs and diesel fuel and run on the diesel principal, without spark plugs and run at 20:1 compression with a turbocharger. They run them in the garbage trucks, sweepers, and other heavy duty class 7 and 8 trucks. They have been pretty much trouble free, and tend to run longer between in frame overhauls than the full 100% diesel trucks. The exhaust is very clean! The cost to run on CNG is about 1/2 of the cost to run on full diesel fuel. It takes about 40 gallon of diesel per month, and daily filling of the CNG tanks. They used to use about 50 gallons of diesel fuel each day!

Oh but the military stuff doesn't care about emissions

Metal hydrides are excellent, but heavy...so far.

You could also use carbon fiber composites, prepreg, and that is also bullet proof. Combined with sealant, leakage and danger of explosion are eliminated.

most car companies have the tech , you can get an RX8 with a hydride cell in the boot lid , only has a range of about 50Km but . they have tested carbon fiber pressure tanks with bullets not sure about hydride cells . The Hindenburg did not burn due to hyrogen , that all did its thing and went UP ,VERY fast . The fire was aluminium metal oxide paint and static discharge mixxing far to well . Human injuries were from falling ,and haveing burning debris rain down ,not any burning gas . The fuel manoploy loves to scare people form researching H ,and HHO with 'remember the hindenburg ', the Titanic sank [ was blown up ] yet we still use ships , risks in most things .[ especially trying to stop th eJPMorgans of this world steal the global finacial banking system ].

@@jordansamhuri You say that, but can you provide an example of anyone who does this? I would love to see it.

As if other fuels aren't explosive in a tank 😒.

That's because they have no space to waste on their land. So everything they do needs to be well thought out. Kinda sucks but incredibly impressive.

You do realize that Helium is a scarce source....Mostly comes from oil wells....

@@regdor8187 ha ha yep 👍 ironic

Nuclear power plants do not just turn on and off. They often produce excess power that is just wasted. So they use the excess power to produce hydrogen. I believe we must embrace nuclear power as a true non carbon based source of energy for the future.

Nuclear reactors also produce helium as radiation

They have been using these engines in the oilfield for years. Not new technology for sure. Ask any oilfield pumper or tech.

Can do the same with a fuel cell.

Have no problem with things that actually work and are cost-effective.

Will you make your own hydrogen with your electrolysis machine?

@@A92_ I don't currently have a need to capture or utilize hydrogen

Are you referring to JCB?

Share a link?

Right, we're these t anks full or empty? Guessing empty due to safety concerns, I'd have to see it to swallow that pill

I wasn't questioning it's legitimacy, I want more information.. considering I have seen the abuse demolition ranch has put standard welding gas tanks through, I'm not saying it's not possible or even likely.. I just wanna see jt

This might be the video he is referencing - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oLyVlMp30tPbcWQ.html&ab_channel=ToyotaUSA

@@jasonsimons4411 I'm looking for the video I saw it on. I'll post if I can find it.

you will never see a 2 stroke hydrogen engine, if you understand how two stroke engines induction system works and how hydrogen behaves you would know its impossible

Lubrication would be a problem, at least

@@MrLinkiscute and the fact that hydrogen in its gaseous form would escape the induction system used in two stroke engines and therefore not allow it to run

@@fluchtigziege3202 two strike gasoline engines don’t have that problem. Why would hydrogen be any different in a two stroke. You’re burning vapor in both scenarios.

@@boomerang379 Hydrogen isn't an atomized vapor, it's a literal gas unless you cool it by storing it contained at a temperature of -252.87*C. As soon as it is released into an atmosphere greater than 1 bar, it will change state back into gas even refrigerated.

Check out this video. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gc6kisx8nqeYp6s.html

That’s a healthy outlook! Couldn’t agree more

Or syn gas and syn diesel aka carbon neutral fuels

Agreed. You can't get rid of that rumble of thousands of explosions happening in front of your feet. It's un american

Ev’s have been out long enough now that it’s time to replace that $20-$30,000 battery and people are starting to get UNWOKE!

I think they were multifuel because the military generally also has jet fuel available as an alternative to diesel.

Batteries kind of smolder. Redivivus is a battery recycling company that has a solution to EVs catching on fire. It is not as bad as you think. Hydrogen in the other hand, is worse than natural gas when it comes to explosions. I would be surprised to see hydrogen go main stream.

Thank you! All cool and fun until things go wrong. Same with nuclear energy.

Like our current hybrid cars?

Hydroelectric vehicle

No, they're not. These experimental hydrogen engines are for optics and greenwashing (as are all green hydrogen pilot projects). Conveniently, nobody ever mentions green hydrogen's biggest problem. Unfortunately, it's the elephant in the room that nobody thinks about but makes ubiquitous green hydrogen engines and fuel cells a nonsense.

The big cam is still produced? Where is it even legal?

@@justinmartin8887 yes still fitting them in ships

There are thousands and thousands of cummins KTA19GC out there in the oil fields

Big boom. No more person. Red mist.

@Valentin, I'm more scared of Tesla, Toyota, Ford, Nissan and Honda's Lithium Ion Battery Powered Electric Vehicles, when Electric Vehicles catch fires they explode like how little boy ☢️ dropped on Hiroshima did.

about as safe as electric cars are in any accident

@@wizardoftehtime oh that's a joke right there! 🤣🤣🤣 Electric Cars are safe? Oh come on man!!

@@Smokkedandslammed lol

Check out this video. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gc6kisx8nqeYp6s.html

@@jjoshua69 Amazing

No Jumpstart, has to be towed, or charged, if that is what you meant by "Jumpstart".

Lack of power? Electric is way more powerful/efficient. That is why locomotives, mine trucks and most boats are powered by electric motors. Most fork trucks are electric, because of reliability, quietness and power to move/shift loads. ICE only took off in the early 1900's because fuel was cheap, not because of power.

@@toddtheisen8386 If that's the case then why do diesel forklifts exist? Why are there no electric cargo ships. Why are there propane forklifts? Also mining the battery materials like lithium is pretty damn dangerous due to toxicity. There's not enough material to go fully electric and you can ot recycle even a quarter of any green energy materials. And if electric vehicles are so good, then why are they not cheaper? If people really cared about the environment then they can make them cheaper.

@@HeLpEr4u083 Cargo ships are driven by electric motors. The engines on board rotate generators, not props. That's my point. Electricity is used for most steady state or high horsepower demands. Not about cheaper. Electric is just more powerful and controllable. Which is why Formula 1 cars are hybrids now.

@@toddtheisen8386 Well I stand somewhat corrected with cargo ships however, battery power is used at lower throttle and the diesel engines are used at higher throttle.

they are not developing nothing they have had these engines for decades and they use these engines in the underground cities the so called elites built

Check out this video. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gc6kisx8nqeYp6s.html

@@jjoshua69 yep people are so gullible these days ..... minds of children .......

Yeah When renewable energy is available. They cant even recharge the cars.

@@tomoconnor7528 Why can't they recharge their cars? If they had solar panels at their house they could charge them at home.

You're right, hydrogen is EXTREMELY, EXPLOSIVELY volatile. Which is why so much work has been put into making safe tanks for it. Currently there are lozenge shaped carbon fiber bottle tanks that can withstand anything short of a nuclear blast. But they are expensive. So the current challenge isn't making a safe tank, it's how to make an affordable safe tank.

@@itsmatt2105 and there lies the other problem. Expense. What's good isn't cheap, and what's cheap isn't good. If we use the economies of scale approach, there has to be sufficient demand in order to help make cost go down. If the cost is too high, the demand won't be there. Unless it's mandated by law that this style of tank is to be used, truck manufacturers are going to cobble together what they deem sufficient. I don't know if you've been in a class 8 truck lately, but they aren't exactly built to the highest standards. I see this flopping like CNG did

@@meatball1324657980 I'm not cool enough for the new stuff, all my trucks are old. I figure if it made it this far and didn't break (too much) it'll probably continue not breaking for another little while. I'm rather ambivalent about the fuel source at this point. I want to see cleaner burning, more efficient engines but so far there's not a clear front runner as far as which will be the best horse to back. All have strengths and weaknesses. Lots of big companies full of people with way more knowledge about the various tech than I have are heavily backing every new technology type out there. If they with all their insider information can't predict a clear winner, I don't have a prayer.

Whilst hydrogen burns easily, it doesn't pool except if the leak is in an airtight container. Hydrogen is very happy to escape from any enclosed space. If it is not in stoichimetric ratio with O2, it will not explode. The worst case is likely to be a flame from leaking hydrogen from a high pressure tank. Unlike petrol fumes it does not pool and then explode.

the h2 tanks are 100x safer than your standard fuel tank and you don't have to worry about electricity fires from EVs, which is even more dangerous. The main concern is production, storage, infrastructure.

Fuels may get better, but making batteries CLEANER, will be quite the challenge.

They have been making a trailer wheel set with a 200 KW motor and a 200 KW battery on the trailer for years. They help with regenerative braking to charge the battery pack, and then use a throttle position sensor to help when getting on the freeway or going up a hill. They are said to reduce diesel use by 13%. The system could also be used on a electric semi, and could be plug in hybrid system, instead of just charging with regenerative braking. I don't think hydrogen will be the replacement for diesel trucks. Maybe a gas engine conversion would work, (3.5L running on hydrogen and putting out about 250 - 350 HP) as a low weight alternative to the traditional diesel engine as a type of range extender. It would allow a semi to have a low cost and lower weight 200 KW battery pack, with perhaps another 200 KW battery on the trailer.

@@dotarsojat7725 agreed lithium and cobalt mining is disgusting business and all these smug losers touting their EV chauvinism need hitting upside the head for their belligerence.

@@Kangenpower7 What's the company that makes the electric wheel set, I am having an issue finding them in the context of semi trucks. My buddy and I(both truckers) were talking about something like that and how it would be beneficial, would like to see how it works.

Let me guess...you plan to ride a unicorn too.

LOLOLOLOL …

I don't think Harley will ever build a hydrogen motorcycle. A electric one would be great, but not traditional enough for them. Maybe in 2035, kicking and screaming "Not US", but then when the performance of the electric motorcycle actually comes out, everyone will want one, and they will go 0 to 60 much faster! Ford had a F-250 that ran on hydrogen using a 6.8L engine and made 550 HP or about 80 horsepower per liter! So a hydrogen powered 3.5L turbocharged V6 could make about 400 HP and power the forward axle on a class 8 truck, then have a electric 400 HP motor on the rear axle, and run it down the road with a 200 KW battery pack, use regenerative braking, and run both motors when they are getting up to speed, or running up a mountain grade.

Hydrogen vehicles have existed for decades but nobody wants them. You say you're excited about hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, but why don't you own a Toyota Mirai, Honda Clarity, or Hyundai Nexo? Also, Harley's Livewire electric motorcycle is currently one of the best on the market. Like all the rest of them though, needs more range.

@@TecnamTwin cost for the electric, through the roof . Great until the battery goes flat. With the idiots destroying the grid, by windmills and panels, have fun.

Hydrogen does not exist in nature. It takes HUGE amounts of electricity to make hydrogen. It is just a VERY INNEFFICIENT BATTERY and is a total scam WHAT DO WE DO WITH ALL THE GASOLINE if we stop putting it in our cars because of the 6,000 products including plastics, drugs, fertilizer etc would come to a HALT if we stopped using oil and we CANNOT STOP MAKING GASOLINE if we CONTINUE! Where will we store it all that gasoline when we move to hydrogen. Love to hear an answer. Its all one big scam to justify burning TAX DOLLARS, not hydrogen.

@@MsKatjie I am having fun. Currently own Chevy Volt and will transition to BEV once the prices get below $20K without tax credits. Also, solar and wind aren't "destroying the grid." They coupled with every storage solutions will save the grid make blackouts a thing of the past.

Like gasoline, they put it through fuel injectors

Yeah, and no range. So a tractor trailer would have to fuel up every exit even if u increased the fuel tank size a bit

"Companies".

Hydrogen has been reported to have quadruple the energy density of existing fossil fuels. Diesel might not be able to compete if you can obtain viable sources of Hydrogen fuel.

@@seanandrew2823 Fuel cell cars have decent range afore refueling now as I understand.

That same question was asked when they put gallons and gallons of highly flammable (and explosive) gasoline in cars. Before that, people worried about boiler explosions in their steam powered vehicles. We will adapt, same as always.

Anything that stores energy is potentially combustible or explosive; gasoline, kerosene, hydrogen, lithium, diesel, etc. Short of using a flywheel as a power source, you will not have an energy source that is noncombustible within the context of daily driving usage.

Liquid hydrogen? At -400F the temperature is very cold, and will require a LOT of energy to make it that cold. So they put the pressure to about 8,000 PSI, and that also takes a lot of power, and requires rejecting a lot of heat while compressing the hydrogen. Natural gas also takes a lot of energy to compress it to the 3,000 or 4,000 PSI they run at. I think that hydrogen takes a lot more power than natural gas to compress it. There is also the danger involved with fuel leaks with natural gas or hydrogen, while compressing it, and when fueling the vehicle.

@@Kangenpower7 You can use hydrogen powered generators. In the end there isn’t enough raw materials to make batteries for electric cars.

No. Wrong.

Costs a fortune to make cryogenic ic hydrogen and store it.

It take a lot of energy to liquify gases. Plus, hydrogen doesn’t store the same btu as diesel.