Can it run doom tho

Well, good luck with that. KFC console will overheat so much that it is best put your chicken on the hardware. Better than XBOX's Red Ring of Death.

Now we are questioning the real questions

@@kiwimerchant121 The only console that has an advantage when overheating.

Can I use Popeyes instead for better performance?

thought my headphones were busted, but no it was just him.

@@michaelsanchez7848 Pretty sure its because it was recorded on windows over a bluetooth mic, they always sound super washed out like this.

Ha, first thought...What the fuck is wrong with my system now?!

I thought my phone was broken. I think he mess’n with us

He has begun his evolution into a charlie brown teacher

Let me bet its creative

He is recording through his super PC that can actually run Cyberpunk

I have no problem at all with the audio...

This game has no bugs It's all just an unintentional creative choice.

Oh, I thought there was an issue with my headphones

I do appreciate the 97 vibe though. But we all could use better microphones xD

He definitely has his priorities straight

I don't really hear anything wrong with his audio, listening on an LG G8 with a dedicated DAC, DTS:X 3D sound, and ATH M40x headphones

@Cd767 Wais I'm glad I'm not the only one noticing this. I can't listen to this and I'm not gonna adjust my sound system just for this video

It seems like a mixing issue and not a mic problem. It sounds like a bad EQ with way too heavy compression, and it definitely needs a de-esser

LITTLE SMOKE

inspiring as my quotes!

@@AbrahamLincoln4 I dunno Abe. Don't sell yourself short!

Yeah alot of it felt like "hello my fellow young people, do you enjoy the funny maymays?"

Train go boom.

Amen.

Sadly nobody listens. They fall into the same trap over and over again. The proceeds to bitch and moan about it after getting scammed.

This. No idea why people are still getting scammed, especially after companies have been doing this for years.

@@natemichael9655 *cough cough* EA *cough cough*

Be like me: pleb who owns a shitty PC from 2009 that can't even run Minecraft, for over a decade I haven't bought a game in like 7 years

I'd like him to vibrate me.... Oh wait Nvm

I need to lower my headphones in that case

@@andrewjohngeorge57 Ayo

Yup

Nice Video

Hey Johnny, get out of my head. Also Arasaka burned without nukes so I hope your happy.

@@acatwithafancyhat5782 A burn is as a burn does. Kudos, Samurai.

@@ChaplainJoshua I took arasaka's ending Johnny. Forgive me 🙏

@@prasunkumar117 You traitor.... tell me your secrets!

I’d like to see an ending where Jonny nukes ‘saka tower again, showing that neither V or Keanu really grew from the start

But that’s not a twist at all; stadia is a remote gaming service where the game is physically run elsewhere and streamed to you, it actually should run as well as a high end pc because that’s what it’s actually running on.

Well graphics should be even better than consoles, but it depends on your connection. However what about the latency? Driving maybe is fine, but what about shooting, doesn't feel sluggish?

That's not a twist, that's actually what Alphabet promised.

@@92HazelMocha It IS a twist though because while it should run Cyberpunk as well as it does, it usually runs most games way worse.

I got it on Stadia for the free controller/chromecast. And it was been the wierdest unexpected success story. I'm the only one of my friends who hasn't been on a month long rage fest lol

But can it run doom?

Honestly you're better off waiting a year + to play this game when it's patched a bit and on sale

80085 Those reading the comments on calculator will get that joke.

Try google stadia if your internet is really good.

@@bobhope4288 I was hoping to keep the comment thread 55378008 but you had to go there

My guess is they’re just as incompetent as most of the people throwing hate at the game; a developer explaining to a business person that the game literally doesn’t work as intended on significantly less capable hardware garnered the same response as most critiques of the game “it just needs more time in development”. They even gave an extra three weeks to “improve the console versions” as if any amount of time is going to improve ps4/xb1 gpu’s.

I mean for them its much better than the alternative

@@92HazelMocha I don't buy that the biz men were "incompetent" since its board are mostly made of developers and founders of CDPR amd was the brain behind the success of the last CDPR game...

@@axelpatrickb.pingol3228 I think it was more of a "we cannot not release it". Like they started development and, like he said in the video, developed it top-down. As new shit became available for PC, they upped that version and made it more demanding. What I believe is that they rarely, if ever, actually looked back on XB1/PS4 to see if it runs adequate there and when they finally realised it doesn't fucking run they were too far in to change anything. There business plan, which they used to get funding, very likely had sales stats for consoles and so on listed i.e. they had to release it there to get the sales they promised investors. At the end they got stuck between a rock and a hard place: Option A: Release it and have gamers on your back. Option B: Don't release it and have large companies on your back. They probably could have found some middle-ground with maneuvering but stuff like the new consoles not beeing widely available due to people mass-reselling them and other shit didn't help that option either. Now as to what they expected to happen I don't know. Maybe they thought their goodwill from the players would let them (partially get away with it), I for one still have friends who defend CDPR ("The reason they released it is because the gamers demanded it and some even send death threats" sure buddy,cit has nothing to do with Christmas beeing around the corner, and not releasing now means they'd loose out on that large sales hype and it beeing the end of the year and CDPR needing to show something to investors) but maybe they thought the backlash won't be that bad and that they can fix it later-on and win people back with free DLC or whatever. I for one am more disappointed with the lack of branching-story lines, but that is a whole different story.

You can't always blame management for everything, games can't be delayed for forever. It comes to a point where yes management is definitely at fault for not dividing up the release dates and being over ambitious but at the same time we don't know the scale of CDPR how many hands were actually touching this project and couldn't get it done. Devs still have to be held responsible for broken games, I mean this games driving is shit, no customizing cars thats you could do in ps2 gta 3? Ai? just bad there are older games with more thorough, layered, and proficient AI... even if some of those AI just cheat. Bugs, glitches, and bricking- so that is also managements fault- no game will be perfect but games should be polished enough to not be embarrassing on release. Look I ain't no corpo schill but sheesh you give Devs unlimited slack is as bad as always trusting higher up management, or preordering. A games gatta come out sometime.

I don't think he's excusing the lying. I think he just figured that buyers should've known better considering the info that was given. But a lot of that is hindsight probably. There is (to me) a difference between the actual developers and the company behind it. Generally, the company doesn't care about lying, as long as there is money to be gained. He also stated as such in his video. However, the developers probably don't have a lot (if any) say in the marketing.

Don't forget they lied to their investors like this, a brilliant plan that hasn't backfired and won't bite them in the ass in the future.

They were probably surprised it ran at all, honestly.

maybe NDAs or something similar? binding contracts that didn't allow them to voice actual opinion?

@@TheBelgianEmperor “buyers should know better”? So you’re excusing their disgusting behavior. Should know better how? No one played it on those consoles before. And they sold and told people that it worked.

no game has the level of raytraced graphics cp77 has

@@floppa_9530 my point is graphics in general have gotten so good any difference is negligible, and I personally get nothing out my car being 10% more shinny.

Sad but true. Since the mid 2010's everything has looked more or less the same.

It will transition into better VR next. It’s getting pretty maxed out to what we can experience on a flat screen I think. Look up the tech they used to film the Mandalorian.

@@floppa_9530 and also no game has as bad AI and npcs as cyberpunk

They acted like disney think about the money instead of what best to do and not to do

The fact it doesn't run for xbox one and Ps4 I feel is the biggest problem. After 8 years of marketing and building for these systems. And even on Pc side the games Functions arent near next gen for a pc as the Ai is outdated. This game was rushed or not even existent till one year ago

@@breakops5339 I think it was finished but cd red wasn’t satisfied with just another good game. No, they want it to surpass Witcher 3 and maybe of all time. That I think is what screwed them over so hard. They ran out of time and the suits weren’t taking another delayed period.

@@breakops5339 >8 years Make it 4 8 years is only 1 teaser. Barely even started. The Witcher 3 wasn't even out at that time. This is the problem with people, thinking teaser=working on it. Falling into the trap again. The real problem here is that they're overhyping things when they working on 1. Cross gen problems 2. New things they wasn't even have clear experience yet (tell me one CPRD games that like Cyberpunk, i'll wait) 3. Unforseen pandemic 4. They wasn't even AAA giant. The main mistake is always overhype and overconfidence, this create unrealistic expectation on both CPRD and hyped fans. If they actually just release several trailers and confirming release when it 100% ready, this wasn't happend. But it kinda obvious why they do this: they in dire need of shareholders for developing this project.

I'd be interested to know the breakdown of sales. Maybe it's available. That'll tell you who was the primary market target

Should have been PC only

@@nicksjacku9750 imagine if they would've done that, probably CDPR would've saved a lot of time instead of wasting it on optimizations for consoles, perhaps they would've made a better or earlier release

@@ittylink If they delayed it for even longer the expectations would grow even bigger every passing second. Which wouldn't of happened had they not announced it several years ago.

This game should not have been released :)

His name is tyler, his brother is cody

The 2077 experience XD

I'm using headphones and, uh, what is meant to be the issue?...:

@Neveeiha I see what you did there, clever lad!

Even if they did, they wouldn't own up to it. X,3

@Nagger Its for the console mishaps though.

thanks for being the only person in the commnets to post this. i was not hyped at all really and i was still horribly dissapointed. Sure the game ran like shit on my 2000$ computer for literally no reason and would brick my graphics drivers every 20 minutes until the first hotfix, but even after that it wasnt what upset me. the gameplay was shallow and pathetic, nearly every major thing advertised that i saw was cut, the lifestyle choices made no impact, the story was really short and shallow in places it shoudlnt have been and holy fuck was the design just bad in some areas. see: police system, shops, crafting, driving mechanics, relationships, gear progression, mods that literally still do nothing, cyberware inbalances, the dozens of ways to softlock your game or progress. underbaked? more like half-baked. Voice acting was impecable and the story, while if short, was good overall, but it ended right as i expected things to finally get rolling, and the jackie montage from E3 that implied the games story was just thrown wholesale into the prologue. i played it for a day, and now i've quite literally run out of anything to do short of killing random packs of respawning npcs. that's kind of lame and the combat is halfbaked too. I dont know, as somone who loved the witcher i was just expecting something half as good as release witcher 3 (which i played at launch) and instead i got GtaV but worse. Game's pretty as fuck though so that's nice, sure.

@Baxi Tabaxi enough with the spam comments he was litterally critisizing the game you dolt

Even when they launch it on the 360 they made chore that the game was at is full capacity when in consoles So they atlist try to give them the best settings possible, CP2077 seems like it was just drop with a "deal with it" attitude

I was actually kind of confused why they even released the game on PS4 and Xbone. I assumed, if they were to bring it to consoles at all, it would have been PS5 and XB1X exclusives. Not sure what the hell they were thinking.

@@TheDeadAlewives The game was going to be released last April. There isn't even a PS5 version of the game, it's running in backwards-compatible mode.

bugs and graphics card are not related at all. also 2060 is a budget card

@@ipodtouchiscoollol he was making an argument about how this game can’t be handled by console due to the graphic cards. My replied would be that a 2060 doesn’t stop the graphical problems from appearing. 2060 is above their recommended stats. In addition, even on pc this game is full of bugs that ruin the game.

did you update your graphics driver?

@@djmccullough9233 yes

You should have gotten a 3900

And I'm here double checking my audio source.

I thought it was just me lol

Sounds kind of like he’s sick.

I got a headache from it.

😹

Made my eyes water

Too cold

I gots a headache from it.

Either his mic is completely fucked or hes got a bad/no eq setup.

I like XD

Yes, yes it does.

yeah, i played it on PS4. its glitchy and not exactly gorgeous, but I've always had low-end hardware so I couldn't care less. the problem is that everything outside the main story is really unengaging. which doesnt really jive with the spirit of the advertising campaign of this game.

@@PlatinumAltaria if you dont watch noodle id suggest you see his crunch culture video, almost all game developers are treated horribly. i havent looked into how bad it was for this game but im sure bio ware is (was) just as bad.

True that. Screw the graphics, the game cannot even function correctly.

@@PlatinumAltaria they did the same thing with the Witcher 3 launch crunches but nobody gave a fuck then because the game turned out alright, you wouldn't care about it now if Cyberpunk did too

did you update the game AND your graphics? im runnning a ryzen 5800x and a 2080 super.. (raytracing is glitchy, turn it off and it should run fine)

The game glitches more than Skyrim.

Still running on the old 980ti x 6700k combo at 1440p and i just encountered my very first quest breaking bug after 140h of playtime. It was on a random side-gig (wakako doesn't call me which doesn't unlock a certain door). Otherwise, I've had nothing other than the odd visual bug and upickable common loot. Sorry to hezr about your experience though, most of my friends play on pc and haven't experienced many bugs either but I have heard of some pc players having your experience

@Baxi Tabaxi bruh he is actively critisizing the game and yet you are calling him a stan? The actual fuck? Oh wait you just comment the same thing over and over again regardless of context... nice

Literally infected his pc

@@Johanisnotreal infected his lungs mate

This is so deeply stupid as a comment to what the video is. You really didn't understand one single word of what was said.

There was an issue with the audio?

But he said his game ran fine tho.

i have a working mic and you do not.

@@stevenutter3614 same, but I didn’t start playing til 1.06 - I’ve got a pretty beefy rig, but I’ve not seen many issues.

the game has been patched. if you update your graphics drivers, combined with the patches, the pc version is fine. u

What's your pc, roughly? I get a good 30-45 fps with a $750 machine on ultra settings

They probably didn't have the time for it, considering they were also trying to downgrade the game enough so that it runs on your cheapo plastic boxes. Removing some pixels and reducing the amount of unnecessarily rendered objects is nice and all, but it by no means is enough to give garbage consoles a chance at running it. They made the right decision to spend the little time they *did* have on downgrading the console versions so you can at least get the game to run.

Glitcher 3

Fully agree

I've been playing it on base Xbox One and that is the most accurate description for this game. I love this game so goddamn much because the writing is superb and the genre is one of my favorites. But good god, I'm going to play New Vegas right now because it's less buggy. Doesn't mean I didn't beat that game on all the endings minus the secret one though. Next playthrough is gonna be post-updates.

My console makes jet engine sounds when I show the dvd to it

@@afinoxi *cries in base ps4*

@@kwayyernorge7436 *cries in base Xbox one*

@@afinoxi cries in kfc console

@@saajith laughs in board game collection

60 hours in. Lacking in content. Some niggas need to go outside holy shit

Half-life 1 is 60 hours long. Cyberpunk can do better

@@drago5819 I am nearly 87 hours in(maybe a bit more)and still have not have finished all the side quest all of the people I see in the comments complaining about lack of content probably just rushed the main story on the easiest difficulty without doing any of the side quest.

I am confident in saying that out of all the rpgs I have played this one may have the best side quest. And I say this after having played other rpgs like new vegas,divinity original sin 2, wasteland 2,kingdom come deliverance etc. It baffles me that so many people are shitting on the side quest and side content when it's easily the best part of the game no cap a majority of them are good enough to be main mission worthy.

I dont wanna come across as defending the game thou it has allot of issues and objectively it is at most a 7/10 hell the game might be complete shit but idc I have not had that much fun with a game on launch day since like forever.

But the pre-order moneys!!!

You cannot announce a game when it's ready, you need the hype to increase the stock price and having more money from investors if your future game has big expectations. For example: when Nintendo announced the N64, they released a technical demo of Zelda, the game was released years after but people was hyped enough... but maybe this doesn't applies to Nintendo, a company with Apple-like hype levels.

@MrlspPrt I see what you’re saying but I must add that The Last of Us was announce 2011 and released 2013. Red Dead 2 was announced 2016 and released 2018. There is no reason a company should announce a game 7-8 years before its release. Announcing a game before they even had a clear vision of what it would be is just asking for trouble.

Here’s a better idea. Have Sony and Microsoft stop making garbage boxes. Sony is trash and Microsoft is basically a software company anyways. Let the Japanese continue being disconnected weirdos since they still make fun games.

@@misanthropicservitorofmars2116 lol, you must’ve really thought “I got them with this one”. Last time I checked, it was CD’s decision to promote and release the game on Sony and Microsoft’s hardware. They were aware of the money that they would miss out on. It’s clear your one of those “pc master race” guys, everybody should be entitled to a functional game, especially when it was promoted to us as working and we paid full price for it. Plenty of other games have way better graphics and performance on the base systems from last gen, so what else is your excuse? Just admit that your precious company failed to make a game work on consoles. No one is asking for maxed out graphics, just a game that actually works.

They made an Xbox for this game. It’s not our fault

@@xlirt the game wasn’t made for the console nor was the console made for the game, and why would that be the consumers’ fault?

The game was advertised as being released on xbox and playstation years ago jackass. Do some research. If you advertise your products to " run pretty well" on last gen consoles, then they need to run pretty well. They should've released on pc then later released them on xbox and ps. Either way they lied about its performance and actually hid the gameplay from everyone. Not cool

@@kylelopez7631 My point has nothing to do with the advertising

@@PlatinumAltaria this is because PCs generally have similar or higher specs than consoles. From the video, Cyberpunk was designed for high-end, enthusiast type PCs. This means its target performance is significantly higher than any console, along with many consumer PCs

Marketing will always promise the max possible (or more if they're lying).

@@TheBelgianEmperor I mean but you should get an idea of what will be needed to run the game to a certain extent you must trust the company

I'm running a 2080 super and it doesnt look nearly as good. Not buying a 3080 for this game.. its boring.

@@feliperojas9860 Companies in general are not to be trusted. There's a difference between the people in it and the company itself. (If you're interested in this, you should search Thooorin's video on this topic)

@@TheBelgianEmperor In this case it shouldn't really be marketing lying. I get what you're trying to say, I think, but thats really only an applicable excuse to soft information: this game is amazing, this monitor is gonna make you feel like you're a gamer, this gamer chair is gonna make you like some professional gamer. All those statements are subjective at best, but its acceptable as an advertisement and I'm not gonna have an issue over the statement. The problem in this case is that they lied about hard information: this gamer chair has a lumbar support pad and can swivel 360°, this monitor has rgb lighting to the back of it with x leds, or this game will run on x hardware at x framerate. With x graphical settings Idk about you but if I get that chair without a lumbar support I'm calling the company and asking them whats up. This isn't some subjective thing of it doesn't look good enough to me. Its that my toy wasn't in the cereal box to begin with. On a side note I actually really enjoy the game, but I do take issues with the way this whole thing has gone down

@Nagger You're right, but I think the issues with the game are enough that even if the performance was fixed tomorrow it wouldn't be remembered on par with The Witcher 3.

People would still storm CDPR on why they didn't make the game for consoles, cause the game had insane hype. Plus it took 8 years, the blowback would have been doubly worse

I agree I was with this video mostly but then the Crap takes and biased pc player shown once he brought up the excuse of why Cyberpunk cant work on ps4 and xbox one. With 8 years for this project under their belt there no excuse this game. In reality they shouldve known what the old consoles could do in terms of power. Like did they not play rdr2 or other mentioned titles.

I think if CDPR sells a game on a platform (console OR PC), people have a legitimate right to expect that it is playable. If the game doesn't work on a platform, then they shouldn't sell it on that platform. Period. It appears to me the console version should have been delayed or cancelled. It needed more time in the oven, for optimization. I don't think it's fair to sell a game to console players and then deliver an unplayable broken, glitchy mess.

​@@kingclint2382 this makes no sense, games come out on pc only all the time, and console only all the time, Forbidden west is coming out on console only and no pc port is planned, and i dont see people freaking out about it, half life alyx is a pc only game and was pretty big, there are tons of platform exclusive games, potentially more that are platform exclusive than at multiplatform. If CDPR made CP2077 on PC only that's their choice. But in no way should any company be allowed to put a product on a platform that it cannot run on. at all. That's like selling food that is not edible to humans in a grocery store and blaming the consumer for it.

I mean, I'm playing the game on my One S and enjoying the hell outta it. The game is also doing great numbers on steam. I'm satisfied with what I got. You can continue crying and complaining here and tell me to stop liking CDPR and not like the game cause it's trash according to you and thus no one should enjoy , I don't care , I'm out

@Baxi Tabaxi i wouldnt really call no mans sky a scam though fallout 76 litterally scammed people so thats fair

yup pretty much, the console market is still too big and profitable for them not to make a console release. However, I think people would've complained a lot if the game was a PC exclusive or current gen exclusive, I know several people will say that they wouldn't complain if this was true and wouldn't have bought the game but that's just a lie, people have unreal expectations about developers these days

Painfully accurate

Kinda makes me feel stuffed up too.

>yikes opinion discarded

Knowledgeable Hub makes a really good argument that CD Projekt Red makes PC games, not console games. But then I wish CD Projeckt Red encouraged people to buy the PC version instead so that this whole kerfuffle wouldn't happen... But then, it all comes down to sales, I guess.

Exactly my plan! My 7-year old pc will not be able to handle this bad boy ;)

So ignore CDPR's promise to "release it when it's ready" with this game?

It may, but not because of cyberpunk 2077

@@bogdanbucurean2087 Its cause they always were PC company.TW3 is its first game to be release on consoles day one. Im glad CDPR is still PC first. One of the last since Blizzard stopped being one. Letting consoles stay an after thought is how i like it.

@@nicbahtin4774 I like it more when companies think of what different platforms could bring to the table and what standards can be reached

The whole time deep down I was assuming this game would end up becoming something like a shallow watered down rpg that prioritizes on the shooting aspects like fo4 and outer worlds

It's just a shame that the only cyberpunk open world RPG is also a huge failure.

@@Gameprojordan and it’s not a shallow watered down rpg??

@@Gameprojordan yeah I know... it is a dumped down rpg with crappy shooting

@@papasscooperiaworker3649 it was, that's what I'm saying, I kind of figured it would have turned out that way due to the overhype and it became exactly that

The world gives so little shit that your street creds do nothing to the world. You’d imagine having high street creds would make more people know about you and respect you. The dialogue for most NPCs are even worse than Skyrim, with passerby being extremely hostile and having nonsensical/shallow conversations with vendors.

@@Coffee_paradox ya I actually did a playthrough from the start with max street creed. All it does is after the main bit, you can buy anything, you can do any mission, and so on. However, some things are level lock. Like it takes getting to a part in the story for things to unlock and you to be able to buy them. Basically, street creed shouldn't be called that since outside of having access to some side missions, it's a limit on what you can buy. "If you oh you want to buy this shirt. Well instead of me doing my job and making money off of someone who wants to buy this shirt. Let's make it where you have to come back after you're better known." It's stupid