Frank T Thanks Frank and thank you for watching.

Thanks Jesse and thanks for watching. Every once in a while both the CZ and the RPR will print sub moa. Maybe once out of 3 separate groups. Thanks for watching and commenting.

Same

Thanks HE SA. I really like the Ruger more than I thought I would. Rick was so impressed he bought one as well. It has been a great training tool.

Thanks Joaquin I appreciate you watching. Stay safe and healthy sir!

@toml802. Fast forward again to 2024.

Jason Carpenter Great to know Jason. I might have to look into that one.

What is GREAT? 1 moa? I really like the looks of the savage, but I don't want to buy another rim fire that will disappoint.

Thanks Matt. I really like them both but the Ruger does fit me a little better. Nothing shoots like my Anschutz but it is a single feed target model. 😞

Thank you Reuben. I hope the same for you and your family. Thank you for watching and stay safe.

You too lonz73 and thanks for watching. I think jumping around with all of the different types of ammo isn’t giving these rifles the justice that is due to them. They both shoot well but I have been playing around with a ton of different types of ammo in the last few days.

I don't think you can go wrong with CZ

To be fair instead of unfair you should taken this into consideration.

I know what you mean Austin. The RPR does feel very cheap in the hands. Hard to beat CZ quality.

i was making the rounds locally lookimg for a ruger american or precision, looked ok but yea felt cheap. never even knew about the cz rimfire line. saw a new 455 ultramatch on the rack amd the quality was so obvious i bought it on the spot. beautiful grain on the wood too. amd its a shooter. real nice

Thanks Todd! I hope you have been well sir. I am liking this RPR more and more every day.

Funny i came across your comment when I just traded my tacsol x ring in for a RPR and couldn't be happier. My x ring wouldn't reliably feed anything below 1200fps even suppressed but shot 1.1 moa with cci standard velocity. The RPR after a few hundred rounds shot the same if not better as I never measured the groups. Both used the same vortex crossfire 2 4x12x50.

@@scottymoh4489 exact same experience. Seemed to like mini mags for reliability, but was getting like 1.5moa with them. Standards were definitely closer to 1 but was just way too unreliable I decided that a .22 was only going to be interesting to me if it was an absolute laser. Luckily lots of good options now

Great point Stephen. Thanks for watching and commenting!

Thanks Josh and thank you for watching the channel. I will check out your channel as well. I just subbed. 👍🏼

I concur. Great point.

I wouldn't say properly, as it was even, just I will say even with high power air rifle, takes 3 or 5 shots to " season " or settle things down when switching brands and weights of the same brands. I dont know why, just does.

Missing the point. He wasn't doing a comparison to see which ammo was most accurate, he was comparing the rifles to see how they shoot against each other. Both rifles had the same criteria when tested and both came out pretty equal. I think his review was spot on for what he was going for. Now, if he was testing to see which rifle was more accurate than the other, he obviously would need to properly clean the rifle between ammo changes and run a mag or two of the new ammo through to really get the rifle properly coated and such, then shoot groups. Problem here is now you are just testing which ammo works best for what barrel/rifle, not really testing if the RPR is better than the CZ. Reason is (hypothetically) that the CZ may end up shooting ultra tight groups with the Federal while the RPR may shoot ultra tight groups with the Tenex. Having a certain ammo match up perfectly with a certain rifle/barrel/twist rate will always shoot tighter groups than another brand ammo/rifle that doesn't match up very well. You are not going to be able to watch a KZfaq video and find that one holy grail of ammo that out shoots all others because it really depends on what your particular rifle likes. Obviously, shooting high quality ammo will almost always out group cheap garbage and high quality rifles will /usually/ out perform bargain basement rifles but when you get to the quality of both the RPR and the CZ or Voodoo or any of the other high end rifles, it will usually come down to the shooter and lots of testing to see what ammo just so happens to be right for that particular setup. Some things I would like to know that were missed is how the ergonomics were between each one, how the grip felt, how comfortable were they to shoot and how were the triggers, pull weight, break etc. How were the mags, ease of use etc. You can always mod-upgrade but am I going to have to buy another $400+ trigger pack to get it to shoot right? If so then it really isn't a $450.00 rifle, now it is a $900.00 rifle (to compare it fairly against the other). If I am going to end up spending $900.00, would I be better off going with another brand that is in the $900.00 range? Still, great review. The RPR looks very promising.

@@gamelord1000 it is I've got one, its a tack driver with most ammo. I haven't found THE ammo for it yet, but I'm trying!

@@gamelord1000 no he was comparing 2 different rifles with different ammo to see which was more accurate. Without seasoning the barrel's when switching lube types the rifle will not shoot to it's potential with that brand of ammo. I've noticed this in my Savage Mark II, Ruger American Target and my Vudoo V22.

And here in Argentina about $16 american dollars x50 CCI SV. And we just don't get premium stuff. Nobody imports it. Taxes.............

@@Robytsu Yeah, its not the gunshops being greedy so much, but as usual, the government tax's is what is causing it, because you know, bullets and guns are bad for you. Just like their tax's on cigarettes and alcohol, well I suppose everything must be bad for us, cos they have plenty of tax's on everything.

If it's as good asmine in .223. Don't bother buying ammo for it and use it as a club. Randy Wakeman says it shoots a pattern not a group.

Accuracy there is no comparison. Rpr destroys it.

@@dallas5374 its great for tack driving yes, but I get nervous, putting the RPR in my rifle sheath on my scooter when I go hunting grouse.

Thanks David. I think the owners manual actually states NOT to use Stingers. I still shot them, mine doesn’t like them.

Mine doesnt like them either

Thanks Badbilly! It turned out really nice for old repurposed wood that I just had laying around.

That would be a good but pricey experiment. I have heard that as well but I have an old savage with a 22” bbl that will outshoot both the CZ and the RPR regularly. Great comment

I think it has to do more with how hot the ammo is than the barrel length. Hotter ammo and magnum rounds may have higher velocity with a 20" barrel than a 16". With most off-the-shelf ammo, a 16" barrel is optimal.

Yes it would. The RPR is amazing in .22WMR.

Thanks Big J.

Trying to get one right now.

I agree completely. For most plinking around the house the CCI standard velocity is plenty good enough for me.

CCI Blazer shoots almost as well as the Standard Velocity. It is my go to ammo for Appleseed. It always goes bang and at 25m the accuracy difference is negligible.

I will have to try that out tomorrow. So far, I have tried almost ALL CCI ammunition, Eley Tenex, Club, Match, and Standard. Wolf 22, Gemtech and a lot of German Match ammo. So far, the Tenex is the one to beat. I just refuse to pay that much for .22 ammo. Thanks again for the recommendation.

The flyers in Blazer open the group up about 1 MOA larger than my groups with Std. Velocity. That is out of a 10/22 with the SS cold hammer forged barrel and the compact Ruger American Rimfire. If there is a way to post a picture I have them on the same target.

LOL! Thanks San Miguel.

Thanks Jerry. One of my favorites is also my Savage mark 2. It has been a great rifle since day 1

That's So Cool !!!!!! Over time i have bought about 12 magazines for my Savage Mark II.

LOL! I only have 2 of them. I have a 5 round and 10 round mag. I need to get a few more.

I also have a Savage 93R in 17HMR. It has the RealTree camo all over the stock. That rifle is very accurate and i have been hitting Clay pigeons at 150 yards with it. I only have 2 magazines with this rifle. It's my Groundhog killing rifle , LOL !!!!

I concur on the MK ii - took mine out for the ist time shooting it today. Put a nikon pro staff on it and had it dialed in 4 shots. Was getting quarter size 5 shot groups with cheap federal ammo. knocked out by this thing. Thanks for the video X-RING I am actually interested in both of these guns as well as the savage precision. Good info

Got the same kind of lucky with my M77/22. It likes Federal product #510. Just a little over 1/2 MOA with ammo that's 5 cents a round.

X2 for the Federal "Hunter Match". Sure wish i could find more of it, i`m starting to get low on how many boxes i have left. My CZ457 holds just under 1/2 inch groups @ 50yds, and 1.25 inch groups @ 100yds w/Hunter Match ammo. Good Stuff!!!

Thanks for commenting Joseph. It’s always kind of hit or miss with rimfire. Before the actual “test” video the CZ shot a 3/4 moa group with the Eley Tenex. My Anschutz will shoot extremely tight groups but only with a few types of ammunition. It is still a lot of fun playing around with what works and what doesn’t. I haven’t ever used or even remember seeing the Hornandy rimfire ammo. I will have to look for some to try. Thank you please stay safe and healthy.

You actually lose velocity with a barrel longer than 16-18" with the 22lr cartridge. The RPR is geared towards competition shooters and longer barrels make it harder to move in and out of props. Most will prefer a barrel shorter than 20" for rimfire.

How is your trigger on your 457?

I hope you are doing well! I would assume this is the same D Young I knew from SC? Stay safe and healthy.

Thanks Noah. What does the Shaw cost?