He always seems to be thinking at the back of his mind that he can't believe h'e got away with it for so long. It's as if he wants it to end to relieve the pressure he's been under. He didn't even pass his A level Art for heaven's sake.
@negara548 жыл бұрын
A level is not the same as a degree. Check Picasso's talent at aged 12yrs
@Lyralye233 жыл бұрын
@Sir LoungeAlot The term masterpiece is relative. What might be a masterpiece to some could be meaningless to others. So in other words, the best way to increase your chance of being able to make something that most people would consider a masterpiece is to play with the odds. You need to study works that are often considered masterpieces to understand what statistically works the best.
@crystal49113 жыл бұрын
@Sir LoungeAlot That's ironic because everything you listed is exactly what his art is😂 You consider crappy dots to be masterpieces lmao. Passing A level art actually requires at least a bit of effort and artistic talent, this guy literally pays people to make dots for him which he then makes way too much money from. (Also an A-level isn't a degree, it's basically still high school. Not even being able to pass that shows he really did nothing).
@Johnconno11 ай бұрын
@@negara54 😂🕳️
@renzo64906 жыл бұрын
Notice she introduces him as one of the worlds most successful, famous, wealthiest artists. Nothing about talent or skill or vision or inspiration. Just success fame and money. Welcome to what passes these days for art in New York.
@JOSEPHCHARLESCOLIN20245 жыл бұрын
I would be happy with worlds most successful, famous, wealthiest artists ....No wait i might happen
@angeliqueroux30175 жыл бұрын
Which means he knows something talented artists don’t. Being successful in galleries is more about sociology than actual artistic talent, I think. Reading the market & networking with the whales.
@mandygenericname18545 жыл бұрын
Strange she doesn't mention the blood on his hands either. Strange how that works.
@rocksaltzwidaz34114 жыл бұрын
you have clearly seen none of his other works
@moreodat4794 жыл бұрын
better than your skills
@matildachia9 жыл бұрын
HAHA THE INTERVIEWER IS JUST REEKING OF SARCASM !!! love it.
@toloupe10 жыл бұрын
A bad poet tries to say something important. A good poet hangs out with words.
@pstotto5 жыл бұрын
Prat aphorism.
@Dragonion201011 жыл бұрын
So, it IS possible to be a multimillionaire and a complete loser at the same time :D Thanks, Damien; you just made me feel really, really good about myself and realize how awesome it is to be a person with integrity by showing me what the exact opposite looks like! :)
@JOSEPHCHARLESCOLIN20245 жыл бұрын
Met me yet?
@pranitsingh83693 жыл бұрын
Why the hate?
@pupu4163 жыл бұрын
Perfectly said
@binmanbinman2 жыл бұрын
says the one with the mlp profile picture
@TheBruceAllen4 жыл бұрын
She compared his million dollar skulls to pimp my ride television show. Godliest of compliments.
@charliedontsurf149410 жыл бұрын
I've got a question for him. Why are you building an un-wanted extension of Ilfracombe with 700 houses on a field next to the town. We don't need it, and we don't want it.
@MrMrWattz6 жыл бұрын
Charlie don't surf I'm pretty certain it wasn't 700 homes
@allourep9 жыл бұрын
The emperor isn't wearing anything
@Raphael30327 жыл бұрын
that's the whole point of his work.
@daikayll18975 жыл бұрын
No its not you dope. Thats Banksy. This is daylight robbery.
@moreodat4794 жыл бұрын
is it not hot topic enough
@RagedContinuum2 ай бұрын
@@Raphael3032 to sell refuse for 100s of millions?
@MissPopuri5 жыл бұрын
New York and Cosmopolitan Elites are the equivalent of an Emperor with New Clothes.
@DeleteChris12 жыл бұрын
In a way i think the spot paintings are about Damien hirst. He knew the reaction they'd get and thats why he made them.
@pstotto5 жыл бұрын
'You make art from what's around you'... err. Sharks skulls and diamonds? Long Jong Silver, is he? :-) Anyway, from the amount of money he's got, he can just about afford three of my drawings.
@pstotto5 жыл бұрын
typo: Long John Silver.
@pstotto2 жыл бұрын
@@peterandrew5169 For every Hirst press space take, a 100 artist suicides and 100 artist's master pieces thrown in the skip by bemused surviving relatives. Is that the skulls bit? In Italy they settled the actor-projection argument in the 60's by jst having Marcelo Mastriani every film actor role or in France, Gerard Deperdiu, in the music business Ed Sheeran fills the slot of generic busker teen-on-a-guitar average youth and he has a fortune of £100 million and all else to the wall as a strange market notion of rarity where every town and city has a Hirst when rarity is the principal collector hook and value.
@clovismcpony10 жыл бұрын
Great salesman.
@clincpb89034 жыл бұрын
He managed to sold me absolutely nothing !
@mariusj342 жыл бұрын
@@clincpb8903 you're not his target audience either, his target audience is millionaire idiots who will eat up anything aslong as the artist says keywords like "love, children starving in africa, diamonds, minimalism" etc. just put some clever words and mix it with tragic real world events, and these millionaires will be forcing this stuff down their throats. So disgusting that we live in a world where real art is always hidden away, and instead we see stupid art made by stupid people all because they are "stupid". The stupidity makes media want to write stories about it, remember no one wants to click on a news article that says "wonderful new art has been made by a new upcoming artist" but everyone will click "These rainbows dots sold for 200m pounds at an auction house". Even the duct taped banana was supposed to be stupid to represent how "stupid" the artworld currently is. Ive said stupid alot now XD
@Jack-pp2ng3 жыл бұрын
Hirst: anything done super well is art I guess he isn't artist
@pommiesniper12 жыл бұрын
His work is about him making money. His ideas are based on what will make him more money. His work is bought by investors & not so much art collectors, though people who have art collections as an investment buy his work. Money. Simple.
@Underhills5 жыл бұрын
Looks like Phil Collins younger brother.
@Celebriedad3 жыл бұрын
If Phil Collins brother fell into a pool when he was a baby.
@MrRealitycheque10 жыл бұрын
horrible insulting reporter, more concerned with insulting damien hirst than actually hearing his side of the story. this is tv journalism i guess
@johnbrocado10836 жыл бұрын
RubberCement so you like Damien guest because you're on KZfaq and many people don't like hjm
@johnbrocado10836 жыл бұрын
RubberCement then watch something else
@MidnightRambler6 жыл бұрын
RubberCement I was impressed that she called him out. This full on bs
@liasisboa6 жыл бұрын
I think she's superb. Challenges him a bit. Most don't .
@roastedbeans20513 жыл бұрын
"red dots mean love" "black dots mean death". sir??! what?
@ARTByJAMESPATRICK10 жыл бұрын
she isn't a very good interviewer
@viviennepettigrew23669 жыл бұрын
Nothing wrong with her interviewing skills, I would say it is the person she is questioning, who can't even give genuine answers who is just making it up as he goes along!
@jootsy88866 жыл бұрын
She's sexy.
@badfreddytube6 жыл бұрын
why do you think that ?
@TheS92764 жыл бұрын
He paints dots. So they were made for each other.
@steviewanda48954 жыл бұрын
His not a very good artist aswell
@fuadarif405610 жыл бұрын
Mr Damien can you spare some change to on old lady like me-self. I million maybe??
@dermapteratenuis12 жыл бұрын
Haah, Ms Luscombe, that was BRILLIANT.
@uxnosidda11 жыл бұрын
Yup, it's the consumers that perpetuate this kind of work. kind of like pop music - no substance (although catchy, and marketed through attractive stars) but tons of demand
@ArtHistoryProfessor2 жыл бұрын
Whether you like Damien Hirst or not-his boldly creative imprimatura on contemporary art has been monumental since the late 1980s. His work is often viewed as being overtly morbid and obsessively fixated with ideas that solely revolve around death and decay. In actuality, nothing could be further from the truth. Instead, his work examines many of the starker perils and pitfalls of our existence as human beings-chief amongst those are our ongoing compulsive addictions-albeit to prescription drugs and/or the decadent excesses of our insatiable desire to want more of everything. Thus, simply put, Damien Hirst reminds us-via his use of adroitly conceptual dialogue-that life and death are, in fact, an inextricably convergent tapestry of sorts. Therefore, through his signature use of controversial objects, e.g., the severed cadavers of dead animals and preserved insects, he forcibly compels us to accept these universal truths that lie at the foundational core of this symbiotic relationship.
@DanielFontaniniArt12 жыл бұрын
yet even when the people hate him, are making others love him
@SuBk.5 жыл бұрын
Hmm, how much animals were harmed during your artwork?
@MrLChurchill6 жыл бұрын
The spots are done with what looks like a plastic paint that resembled plastic on some women's trainers I bought a couple of years ago and which I thought were deliberately intended to be unattractive. I'm making the point because I wondered if there were some link between the two, if for instance he were criticising a particular designer.
@Aetila3 жыл бұрын
I like his spot painting A better then spot painting B, it has more feeling, lol. I think somebody had to do this, one must have a precison to paint like this and the colors are great.
@straitJacketFashion12 жыл бұрын
Whether you respect him as an artist on not, there's no denying his business acumen. "His" pieces polarize public opinion, but this have little bearing since his customers are not the mass but the fat cats, who lap it up. But their milk turned sour after the bubble burst, yet Hirst came away smiling. You may doubt his proficiency as an artist, but he is a master con-artist.
@MsMissymelbourne10 жыл бұрын
scuse the pun but why put the guy on the spot asking him bout his fortune when it is common knowledge?also she would never have the balls to ask a member of the royal fambly that what you worth question so in essence she is taking the working class boy to task the silly cow
@miami0533310 жыл бұрын
4:46 - 4:50 Yeah, OK. :|
@ColeSheltonArt3 жыл бұрын
Regardless of your opinion of Hirst and his work that interviewer was so disrespectful and rude for no reason.
@vedros682211 ай бұрын
Superficial interview, you don't need Hirst to answer those questions, all those questions are already answered 100 years ago in art history.
@evesapple11 жыл бұрын
dont judge by his words. judge by his actions. Its easy to say you dont care about money when you've got 300 million in the bank. But what do you think the price tag was on one of those dot paintings?
@babblesandbubbles12 жыл бұрын
everyone talks about the skull as if it were merely a thing... shouldn't people be asking WHO that was before it became a piece of artwork?!?
@TheAnimeStop12 жыл бұрын
This is what you call art? You through a bunch of spots on a white frame and you've suddenly made art? My bathroom has spotted wallpaper, so wheres my fame and fortune? This guy is the poster child of modern "art".
@lovehandle34543 жыл бұрын
I looking at ways to be an successful artist and came across this guy and searched him on yt. Have to say I’m highly disappointed. Thought it was going to be someone with great skill and passion for art but no. I didn’t hear in passion in his voice for his artwork. I know we say “art is subjective” but y’all we need SOME type of standard if people like this are rising to the top for dots
@barryryan82679 жыл бұрын
There's only one question; .... Why
@superbigidiot9 жыл бұрын
+Barry Ryan There's a lot of books which try and overcome that question. Sorry mate there's no objective answer to anything that abstract, you could probably go to the philosophy section of your local library and find some type of belief system which you wish to subscribe to, but that's the best I can honestly offer.
@MultiJebusChrist8 жыл бұрын
+Barry Ryan There is no why with art this generic and uninspired...
@moreodat4794 жыл бұрын
@@MultiJebusChrist it´s gorgeous
@owofoxy49733 жыл бұрын
money. duh.
@rainerbuechse69237 ай бұрын
I love him and his art. He is a f*cking genius!
@ggindia98962 жыл бұрын
that tone shift towards the end.
@RitaGehman2 жыл бұрын
I love when good artists make good money. I think everyone should have business skill.
@arildheggelund28248 жыл бұрын
Its not the actual piece of art in itself thats essential. Its this great man.
@tanakinskywalker70893 жыл бұрын
Stop it he’s horrible
@sarahgeorgette7528 жыл бұрын
The English subtitles are so lame and full of misunderstandings they hardly make any sense. I even suspect that this was done on purpose. Should you need new subtitles, I'd quite happily volunteer.
@rahxun11 жыл бұрын
I honestly think that's a really good idea.
@cmknox7779 жыл бұрын
Yes I have heard of them.
@G470011 жыл бұрын
If he wasn't as rich people wouldn't be so mad. His work is great. Hes not davinci, but he never said he was. Take artwork for what it is and stop hoping on the hate bandwaggon.
@sierra7506 жыл бұрын
bless you my friend. I agree
@MsMissymelbourne10 жыл бұрын
some people!!!commenting here want their artists to remain poor while they themselves hate being poor surely.who likes being poor?and as for the oh he aint a good painter thing well...he can paint too.he chooses to do other stuff like duchamp ...whats wrong with a floating beach ball .?how is it inferior to a master painting of god and the angels or the king and his wife?
@JOSEPHCHARLESCOLIN20245 жыл бұрын
agreed
@seandavies4673 жыл бұрын
He laments a World where there is love 'amazing' and yet there is also the murder of children 'in Africa'. Indeed the World is populated by those who know love and also by far too many with empty hearts. He should be grateful however, it's the self-seekers and sociopaths who have given monetary value and recognition to his vacuous art. In a near-perfect World Hirst would be a bus driver.
@Johnconno11 ай бұрын
He can't drive.
@PrometheusMonk5 жыл бұрын
This is a rather bad interview. Damien Hirst is actually a quite capable and, at times, even brilliant artist. But perhaps he nailed it when he said that it's hard to make art when you're rich.
@JOSEPHCHARLESCOLIN20245 жыл бұрын
My Art is All About Money it's self & time & YOU can Price my art Yourself 🔘⚪⚫🔴🔵
@gregdahlen43754 жыл бұрын
even tho in theory i hate these dots if i had a chance to see them in a gallery i probably would
@Johnconno9 жыл бұрын
I've a feeling his worst fear will happen, maybe already...
@superbigidiot9 жыл бұрын
+jaye see Surely the mere fact that you're watching this video is a contradiction to that statement.
@Johnconno11 ай бұрын
@@superbigidiotAre you still alive?
@superbigidiot10 ай бұрын
@@Johnconno Wtf
@P4INKiller11 жыл бұрын
This guy is a professional troll.
@belignacack12 жыл бұрын
that was the point of the YBA's
@JohnSmith-su3ze5 жыл бұрын
Asking someone their net worth is incredibly rude. Why does these media scumbags think they can ask people rude questions like that?
@sahilagarwal66013 жыл бұрын
i have never been to an art school. nor do i draw to sell or stream. but i know for a fact that i could draw better than him.
@steviewanda48954 жыл бұрын
I saw Doug Demuro review on a Las vegas suites and the Theme was terrible led me to this artist who designed it I think is very bad. Your paying 100k$ a night and you see polka dots theme shit.
@ALi-mc4ve7 жыл бұрын
ADMIRAL LORD NELSON WHAT A HONOUR.
@johnlarrazabal74944 жыл бұрын
What people missed...was that it was self therapy...how to handle insanity...how to deal with my past...
@mariusj342 жыл бұрын
Damien Hirst is a fraud lol He has some unique ideas. I kinda like the painted dots, that are supposed to show imperfection by the human hand. It could definitely be better though with some more thought put into it. Seems like something anyone could do for an art project in school. The thousand years artwork, seems more like an experiment you could do for a KZfaq video, but he just said "this is art" and ran with it. In my personal opinion he gets credit for more than he actually achieves, and as proof of this i want you to see the hotel room he created which is covered in "More Doug Demuro" 's video "Here's a Tour of the World's Most Expensive Hotel Room ($100K/Night)". When you look at what Damien Hirst has done here he just slapped some of his signature work on the walls and was like "my work here is done" instead of innovating new art. There is litterally medical trash under the kitchen table, which is supposed to resemble the pharmaceutical and medical art he does. Instead it just looks like someone hasn't cleaned the kitchen table for years. The rainbow colours used everywhere makes it look more like a McDonald's playroom than a 100K USD PER NIGHT LUXURY HOTEL ROOM hahahahah. And dont get me started on the pills he has on the walls or the pill packages he assorted in rainbow colours and said "ART!". To me it seems like he created his arts not from random genius thoughts like most artists, but instead he was like "I'm gonna do something that makes me look like a genius artist" and so he took the first ideas that came to his head. The whole hotel room was also just old art pieces and he reused them because he couldnt bother to make new exclusive art for the hotel room even though he was probably paid millions to do it. Don't get me wrong, some of his artworks are kind of maybe mildly unique, but the hotel room really shows that he only creates art when its necessary and not because he wants to. To me he seems like a con artist just trying to get by in the art world. Like no real artist (who wants to innovate) would ever do what he did to that hotel room if they were offered the opportunity. Something that would have been more fitting for a hotel room, which would be luxury.
@emmanuelalonso88726 жыл бұрын
its the people who purchase his works that are chumps, and should be asked why
@svoksis12 жыл бұрын
@modernhumble well, there has to be one
@inesdalmey3123 жыл бұрын
Plain vanity, nothing else, no substance, no skill, no vision. Fashion a thin as a papercut. Oh what sad times
@mjmartinejohn12 жыл бұрын
So. If that woman was interviewing me, I would have told her to ---- off.
@renzo64906 жыл бұрын
Let me begin by telling you that when my brother was just starting school, he rebelled at the rules of spelling. Why did words have to be spelled in a particular way? Why couldn't he spell them as he wanted to spell them? He resented the rules and he resisted the authority of those who made them ! Keep this in mind. I think that Conceptual art comes from people who could not and would not do the difficult work required to become a 'traditional' artist. Can't master the necessary skills ? Can't understand how to use color to create mood? Can't master composition? Can't draw or understand human anatomy? Can't figure out how to express your feelings with image? Can't be bothered ? Well then, belittle the importance of those skills and debase the notion that they are a prerequisite to creating art. Instead, create an art genre that you CAN do. A new genre...conceptual art. Conceptual artists claim that IDEAS and CONCEPTS are the main feature of their art. They can slap anything together and call it ''conceptual art'' confident that viewers will find SOMETHING to think about it no matter how banal or trivial the artist's concept! There is no way conceptual art pieces can be judged. The promoters of this art have attacked the motives and credibility of authorities and critics who might disparage the work. They have rejected museums and galleries as defining authorities. They reject the idea that art can be judged or criticized . All of this results in a decline in standards. And when you jettison standards, quality suffers. There really IS such a thing as BAD art ! We know this only because we have standards and criteria by which such things can be evaluated. It seems that conceptual art comes down to a basic idea: No one has the right or authority to make any judgments about art ! Art is anything you can get away with ! A whole new language has been created to give the work an air of legitimacy and gravitas. Conceptual art is 'sold' to the unwary public with ....."ArtSpeak". ArtSpeak is a unique assemblage of English words and phrases that the International Art world uses but which are devoid of meaning! Have you ever found yourself confronted by an art gallery’s description of an exhibition which seems completely indecipherable? Or an artist’s statement about their work which left you more confused than enlightened? You’re not alone. Here are examples of ArtSpeak: ''..she manipulates architectural structures in order to deconstruct socially defined spaces and their uses and test novel and playful possibilities." Or ' 'Works that probe the dialectic between innovations that seem to have been forgotten, the ruinous present state of projects once created amid great euphoria, and the present as an era of transitions and new beginnings.'' This language is meant to convince me that there is real substance to this drivel which is being passed off as 'art'. But I don't buy it. Plenty of other people DO buy it. But not because they understand or love the work. They are laying out enormous sums in the belief that their investment will bring them high returns in the future. One Jeff Koons conceptual piece is three basketballs suspended in a fish tank. Here is Koons' own ArtSpeak explanation of his floating basketball 'concept' verbatim: “ This is an ultimate state of being. I wanted to play with people’s desires. They desire this equilibrium. They desire pre-birth. I was giving a definition of life and death. This is the eternal. This is what life is like, also, after death. Aspects of the eternal” Rather lofty goals for 3 basketballs suspended in a fish tank!! It sold for $350,000. I wonder what it would have fetched without Koons' name attached to it. ___________________________________ Something radical has happened to the art scene in the past 50 years. Cubism slid into non-representational art....what is called Abstract. Abstract or non-representational art is a legitimate and often profound genre. But to many people, it appeared as if this new style had no structure or principles. It’s markings seemed random and arbitrary. Something that anyone could do. Any composition of blotches or scribbles was “Abstract Art”. This was the slippery slope that led to the abandonment of standards in art. Art is what I say it is ! And lots of people jumped on the art bandwagon. A tacit agreement forms among critics, galleries, publications and auction houses to promote and celebrate certain artists and styles. Objects with no artistic merit are touted and praised . Their value increases with every magazine article, every exhibition in a prestigious gallery. And when they come up for auction, sometimes the auction houses will lend vast sums to a bidder so that it appears as if the work of the particular artist is increasing in value. The upward spiral begins and fortunes are made. And many are reluctant to declare that the Emperor is, in fact, naked lest they appear boorish unsophisticated Philistines ! This now the state of Contemporary art. The love of money is the root of all evil. It has corrupted politics. It has corrupted sport. It has corrupted healthcare. It has corrupted religion. And now it has corrupted art. But, there is reason to hope. As much of the wisdom of the Greeks and Romans was kept alive through the Middle Ages in small pockets of learning and culture, ateliers have sprung up around the world that are devoted to preserving and handing down the traditional visual arts: drawing, painting and sculpting to each new generation. And when this craze for conceptual art has burned itself out and when visual art is no longer looked on as mere decoration and when schools that have dissolved their art programs want to reestablish them again, the world will find these skills preserved through the atelier movement.
@dasbakon11 жыл бұрын
Why?
@wolfumz10 жыл бұрын
I feel kind of sad for hirst when I watch this. He's like a child.
@superscienceshow7 жыл бұрын
Dali did the spots in the 50's.
@heatherrios543 Жыл бұрын
so no one can ever make spots now? 😅 that's as silly as saying no one can paint a sunset because some artist is 50BC painted a sunset 😅😅😅
@AndyPutt16 жыл бұрын
The worlds most successful crap artist.
@bencar85234 жыл бұрын
Can not log in to Snapchat
@AP-ir6sl6 жыл бұрын
Making it up as he goes you should name him bingo a little spot you buy
@eeeyyyeee8 жыл бұрын
I think this is the second video by this "reporter-at-large," I've seen, and I must say, I don't understand how a reputable corporation like TIME could distribute such videos. This interview is terrible. Why is she so focused on the money, and how is she getting away with being subtly antagonizing during these interviews. She clearly thinks it's ridiculous how much art is worth to the public, and she clearly doesn't think contemporary art, is art. So what's the point?
@cortex31538 жыл бұрын
she's right
@jhoan_roa5 жыл бұрын
Damien Hirst AND Jhoan Roa ARE MY FAVORITE ARTISTS
@bnon360spin44 жыл бұрын
Roa Arte that’s sad
@owofoxy49733 жыл бұрын
then im sorry to say but you have trash taste for art
@skeeterhmcr9 жыл бұрын
I would disagree that anything done well is art. Any conscious action is art.
@superbigidiot9 жыл бұрын
+Duncan M'Gregor So what is art then? Almost every piece of work is different that what it was actually intended primarily to look like. Do you not find the visualisation and the representation of the unconscious interesting at all?
@ambrose71963 жыл бұрын
The thing about art is that you need context to understand the underlying theme below the surface. Piet Mondrian, Kandinsky, Marcel Duchamp, two conceptual artists that when I first saw their art, thought it was rubbish but after understanding the motivations, realised they may have been onto something. Perhaps the true exceptions to the rubbish that has plagued the 'art is in the eye of the beholder' that has ruined aesthetics over the conceptual. But the thing is, conceptual art is important. It's just that so much dadaism is rubbish and so much contemporary conceptual artists try to replicate the genius Kandinsky and Duchamp did and end up ruining art. Damien Hirst, from this comment section seems to be hated on because of the assumption that he put no effort into his art and all he did was paint dots. But in truth, Jackson Pollock is the true garbage who put no effort. Damien Hirst on the other hand, I'm trynna say, he DOES put in thought to his conceptual art. See- his first couple works on the dot paintings were painted by hand using a compass and tools to exemplify the imperfections the human touch imprints onto a painting. With the precision of machinery that are able to produce perfect dots, Hirst's man-made dots were full of imperfections, cracks and brush strokes observed in the white surrounding and dots. The concept of the human touch of imperfection possessing a sense of perfection can be observed in his later life with the mass-manufacturing of these perfect dots with machines that essentially devoid the later dot paintings of the original purpose that kinda backfired on itself, kinda ironic. His other works follow the theme of death. Same theme of death, different mediums to explain the same thing. I'm too lazy to explain the analysis behind his other messed up works but his installations are really all about life and death. We eat animals but we somehow can't confront the butchering of the animals. So... a work like 'Mother and Child (Divided)' allows you to walk past the rotting corpse stored in formaldehyde solution as an introspective piece. Another piece from afar, looks aesthetically pleasing, real beautiful. Look closer and you realise that the patterns that construct the piece is made of innumerous butterfly wings. So many butterfly wings. The dude really killed alot of animals. Trust me though, it's not just animal cruelty. There's a purpose behind it but go ahead and research 'A thousand years' the art work by him to 'get' him. Personally, I like his art. Similar to Francis Bacon and really quite fascinating. His works are conceptual art so... if you dont get what he's doing, just google it.
@sahilagarwal66013 жыл бұрын
at least jackson pollock's paintings look good from far.
@mariusj342 жыл бұрын
Definitely not an icon of an era, but he has some unique ideas. I kinda like the painted dots, that are supposed to show imperfection by the human hand. I hated when he was being so cheesy with the "red means danger, white is purity, black is death" JUST EW. That was way too cheesy. It could definitely be better though with some more thought put into it. Seems like something anyone could do for an art project in school. The thousand years artwork, seems more like an experiment you could do for a KZfaq video, but he just said "this is art" and ran with it. In my personal opinion he gets credit for more than he actually achieves, and as proof of this i want you to see the hotel room he created which is covered in "More Doug Demuro" 's video "Here's a Tour of the World's Most Expensive Hotel Room ($100K/Night)". When you look at what Damien Hirst has done here he just slapped some of his signature work on the walls and was like "my work here is done" instead of innovating new art. There is litterally medical trash under the kitchen table, which is supposed to resemble the pharmaceutical and medical art he does. Instead it just looks like someone hasn't cleaned the kitchen table for years. The rainbow colours used everywhere makes it look more like a McDonald's playroom than a 100K USD PER NIGHT LUXURY HOTEL ROOM hahahahah. And dont get me started on the pills he has on the walls or the pill packages he assorted in rainbow colours and said "ART!". To me it seems like he created his arts not from random genius thoughts like most artists, but instead he was like "I'm gonna do something that makes me look like a genius artist" and so he took the first ideas that came to his head. The whole hotel room was also just old art pieces and he reused them because he couldnt bother to make new exclusive art for the hotel room even though he was probably paid millions to do it. Don't get me wrong, some of his artworks are kind of maybe mildly unique, but the hotel room really shows that he only creates art when its necessary and not because he wants to. To me he seems like a con artist just trying to get by in the art world. Like no real artist (who wants to innovate) would ever do what he did to that hotel room if they were offered the opportunity. Something that would have been more fitting for a hotel room, which would be luxury.
@mariaeskenasy135812 жыл бұрын
History will teach you a lesson
@reymontcantil1998 жыл бұрын
i can't stand the host.
@raulhenriquez35915 жыл бұрын
Artist? It is much to say.
@pumpkaboo76926 жыл бұрын
Just one thing: HAMPARTE
@oscarmaoricio13654 ай бұрын
Habla cañon como Pete Doherty 😮
@timothyhill11497 жыл бұрын
he is not articulate
@sleepnabox5 жыл бұрын
Doesn't matter when u got British accent.
@owofoxy49733 жыл бұрын
he doesn't need to be.
@ivikansostudio5 жыл бұрын
She put the artist so uncomfortable, with really silly and superficial questions. Imagine to have five minutes to interview Leonardo Da Vinci: you really want to ask to Leonardo about is bank account? When you have a Visionare in front of you, you must seek for the artist's vision of the future. I admire Mr. Hirst, he was so polite; other common people not even answer to her on several points.
@Flowmotion100010 жыл бұрын
I dislike the way contemporary artists colonise an idea - usually someone else's idea. The dots are originally from scientific manuals and the spin paintings are obviously from funfairs.
@alistairkinnear873711 жыл бұрын
Hmm, seems to me that he worked hard for what he has, and gets paid well for that. I'm not a fan of the midlands and the hardness of those from there, but he seems to break the mold.
@treyakasprings4 жыл бұрын
Alistair Kinnear shut da fk up Moron
@munoz69526 жыл бұрын
I just watched the documentary. Someone tell me whats up with the Mickey Mouse sculpture???
@arbitrarychemistry4 жыл бұрын
Damien Hirst doesn’t believe in God bc he has made himself the god of his own life.
@heatherrios543 Жыл бұрын
lol ok
@viciouscircle7802 Жыл бұрын
I reckon hes prime position for pimp my skull❤
@rcronico112 жыл бұрын
clearly you didn't listen to the interview
@emmanuelalonso88726 жыл бұрын
people's jus jealous of his success
@jamesday10597 жыл бұрын
This was really insightful.
@AP-ir6sl6 жыл бұрын
True artist create their own work they're Outsourcing to make more money it's more about money than art phony baloney
@Makonen4423 жыл бұрын
💯💯💯💯💯
@MrSebboxxx10 жыл бұрын
Is he a charlatan or not ?
@JootsyMann3 жыл бұрын
Business Artist supreme
@owofoxy49733 жыл бұрын
well,,, what do you think?
@DisobedientSpaceWhale4 жыл бұрын
He says 'you know' a lot
@OFFONE3 жыл бұрын
His art is literally poco dots??? Wtf you can’t make this shit up for a $1mil a piece who’s dropping money like that??
@Jack-pp2ng3 жыл бұрын
Pretentious rich people just because they can
@rcronico112 жыл бұрын
no one understands him. most underrated.
@LondonDada11 жыл бұрын
Shows there's hope for brickies and decorators to make a living in art - if that's not too much of an insult to brickies and decorators? The system's totally bent, DH merely one of its instruments (of torture, lol). Money for old rope - we'd all do it in his place for sure. Good luck to the guy..
@reuben89123 жыл бұрын
Completely anti Hirst biased but better than nothing
@johndough652 жыл бұрын
Why is he ripping off Johnny Depp's ring style lol