The only difference there is the speed at which Danya is able to play. There is no way you could pre-move or play a more in less than a second consistently using a computer.

100%

Isn't Danya playing against subscriber?

@@shahrulyusryroslan5826 in this series, no. He's just in the regular playing pool

@@shahrulyusryroslan5826For the spreedrun he just plays against anyone in the chess.com pool, I believe

Hahahahah. How come this gem doesn't have any reply? Lol

lmao, this is underrated

HAAHAHAHAHA

@@amit.k4012 Such things need no reply.

This comment should have thousands of likes

I smiled so hard when he said that haha

I wonder what happens when two GMs cross each other doing anonymous speed runs. Is it like that Spiderman meme?

Thought it was wine lol

It's the nerd equivalent of going on the beach to lift weight for showing off.

With the pinky out. Perfect touch.😆

he did what he said :-)

I bet Danya himself wished he had these to watch growing up. So much value and knowledge from every video! AND FREE!!!

Couldn't have said it any better

@@SceneryBreak chess prodigies are trained by strong players I'm pretty sure

@@shashlik7959 usually yea i think so. but ive noticed that they tend to become much stronger than their coaches

Climbing The Rating Ladder has entered the chat...

... to what?

keep grinding my guy ! you can become a master just don’t give up.

Watch Game Deuce

i can't find Kote on chess.com

@@dobysimson3312 hes gone,search google and u can find him in others games.it says it was closed for fair play violations

He actually played several more games over a few days after encountering Danya. What I suspect is during the downtime of Danya talking through his moves, he got curious and checked the profile and realized he was playing against a GM speedrun account. If he played on without cheating it'd be obvious he didn't earn his rating, and if he cheated... well, it would be obvious that he cheated. Resigning was a panic move to try and avoid being banned. The funny part is that he got banned later regardless.

@@malle4234 I'm glad this was checked. That guy also played very suspiciously. Ba4 was particularly weird.

Thats what I thought mid game, I knew it

John Bartholomew too.

He does insinuate a lot, though. He just doesn't explicitly say it on camera.

"Well... looks like we have a cheater here... or he's stream sniping... definitely cheating"

@@pastpianist levy analyses the profile history before saying someone's a cheater

@@marcelloditta7957 don't come here with facts. these people just wanna hate

Or at least as accurate

Lol nah,,,stock fish makes better moves but needs more timing and depth, that's why Danny was able to hold it

Well, a low-depth stockfish hampered by need to play in a manner to avoid the algorithm from immediately booting him from the website.

But it's stockfish that DECIDES what the accuracy is. And it's not necessarily correct. Cus a computer playing at 100% accuracy according to stockfish, will get crushed by the next generation of engine. So that 100% was never 100% in the first place.

@@ashscott6068 dude, it's a joke...

Yeah haha 😅 I occasionally see where and why he leads the games towards certain things but I end up watching for entertainment

Can you explain the significance, for someone who doesn't understand streamlabs?

@@TheWolfnman It's the software a lot of people, including Naroditsky, use to stream. Different sources are basically the elements that are being layered on screen, including audio and any overlay. The Charlie source is presumably for when he does streams with moistcritikal and puts his facecam on the screen. :)

@@jackthorndyke3390 I see, thank you

Nice catch

That’s actually pretty wholesome lol

Activate your pinky for bicep curls and self-satisfied tea sips

He almost has 200,000 subscribers, what part of it is undervalued to you LOL

If you look up his account you can see it is an approved speedrun account, so they know it's him if he gets reported

Some dude said he was the fastest growing player he'd seen. I bet that was kind of a jab at him.

@@wjkkwjkf2980 Ah, okay!

@@Ninterd2 who said that?

When you're too good in Bullet. Even the jacket is pre-moved

he premoved it

Wdym its tea

If he takes the pawn on c7 then he opens the file for rook allowing rook c8 losing the knight, I’m surprised he didn’t explain it because I was thinking the same thing when I saw it

what is special about it

Scholars mate? 😭

@@moses4203 you can analyze your friends online games at hyper speed haha

Well if you went RH4, black would either go BH8 or BH7, and white wouldn’t have gained any advantage.

It has 2 serious drawbacks: one immediate (tactical) and one longterm (positional). Positional: it opens C file for black to put pressure on white's knight and week pawn. It's risky, it gives black initiative and counterplay. Tactic drawback: you loose a knight. After Qxc7 black plays Bb4 and you have no way to defend knight. If knight moves, you loose rook.

@@dariuszpys9307 ah ok thanks.

I think if promoted piece is able to check it promotes to that piece, in that case it was queen ?

Phew, really been struggling with this. Glad he's covering it

Qc7 black plays Rook b to c8 and you lose your knight

@@robertriddle9115 well you dont lose your knight you take bishop on e7 but black gets a ton of activity after Rxc3 and white is probably lost because now your queen is misplaced and black is attacking

I think we all felt satisfaction in that time out

dude

Legend

Madlad

both opponents actually

But then it would be harder to explain his thoughts in real time, can't let cheaters ruin teaching!

Cheater, as his account has been closed

There has been talks going on offline . Gothamchess deleted his original tweet and posted a new one that he will be talking to the persons involved at a comfortable time .

@@marksolvent3259 i think it would be great if a GM analyse, whether the ban was right or not

GM vs IM is rarely an even match

Not that easy after black takes the Bishop on f6 which is Bxf6 then the square on g5 is guarded not that easy to sac the light bishop and check by the Knight on g5

@@dexterlawliet8521 Ah of course. Thank you❤️

@@evanlewis2349 glad to help 👍

Probably realized he was playing a strong GM and in a panic quit, trying to avoid being detected as a cheater. Obviously, he ultimately failed to do so.

No idea how the second guy is obvious. I didn't find in that game anything fishy. While watching I was making move predictions and I matched every single move he made up to Kg8. Not saying he wasn't a cheater, but that's just silly to accuse for cheating based on 1 game where you really have close to no hints. That's the issue with simple, technical, often reached positions - moves are so easy you just can't differentiate between good player and a cheater. I'm also not a great believer in chess.com antiban system cuz I know sometimes people are getting banned for no reason. I'm not a great player, just good - able to beat Nadya bot f.e - and I was once banned as well. On the other hand there is plenty of undetected cheaters on low elo. In fact chess.com in popular belief - no accessable data - is known to have the highest number of cheaters on the server. Alltogether I feel their antiban system is lacking something substantial, so I wouldn't take for granted ban as a prove of cheating. And I really don't care what titled players connected with chess.com have to say about algorithms. I have mate who has the account on chess.com is below 1k, rarely plays and uses engine from time to time for "fun" and trolling purposes. I also teammed with him several times for educational purposes where he scored with my help over 90% accu every time and obviously won all. Account is still not banned, because chess.com doesn't care much about low elo cheating.

@@DonFreeq I mean you said it yourself. People below 1k elo probably don't even know if the opponent is using an engine. But strong players like GMs can easily detect whether they're playing an engine or a GM. And how is it not obvious? Exactly 4 or 5 seconds on very obvious moves screams cheating and the account was closed rightfully

@@sankara760 Well, time usage maybe is a little bit suspicious but moves aren't. GM's indeed can easily detect cheating but not in all positions. Here it was too simple and straightforward. I'm not saying guy wasn't cheating, I'm just saying it's unjustified assumption if it's based only on that game. I don't believe chess.com algorithims and I would like to encourage you to do that as well. Fact you have seen that game, which doesn't tell a lot, and that chess.com has banned the guy is not enough for accussation in my opinion. Maybe he was cheater indeed, maybe not, but I would not take it for granted. That's all.