Dank Daniil Trifonov habe ich mich in die Musik Scriabin's verliebt ! Er gehoert jetzt zu meinen liebsten Komponisten. Der wundervolle Daniil spielt mit so viel Hingabe, Liebe und Freude - nicht nur Scriabin, sondern jedes Musikstueck das er in sein Herz aufnimmt , und dies brilliant ! ❤

Daniil is The Musician that can play slow and with a natural tempo. He never plays the virtuoso but always plays the MUSIC.

Maravilloso concierto, extraordinario intérprete.

Grande delicatezza, grande sensibilità di Trifonov, meravigliosa simbiosi fra pianoforte e orchestra, necessaria in questo concerto.

This Concerto is so underrated!! Amazing piece of music!

First movement : 0:01 Second movement : 8:25 Third movement 17:57

I am 68 years old and the first time I saw him perform as a 8 year old I knew instantaneously that he was born to greatness! Even the great Martha Agerich acknowledged that he was a genius! Personally I feel he is the next Rubenstein and Horowitz and he is still so young. What a brilliant performance of Srabian Piano Concerto he plays with such emotions and brilliance!

Extraordinary . Out of this world.

My first time crying at a concert was when Trifonov played this with New York Phil in Nov 2019. First time hearing this concerto live too. Simply so beautiful and romantic. Trifonov knows how to communicate with music.

Belo Concerto, com o melhor pianista de sua geração 👏👏👏

My personal favorite piano concerto

Brilliant ❤❤both,composer and pianist ❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊

Le très beau et romantique concerto pour piano de Scriabine n'est pas très connu, ni très souvent joué, contrairement à ses études et ses sonates. Trifonov le met ainsi en valeur par spn jeu subtil et brillant.

I really wish that I could perform this concerto with orchestra someday. It is one of the most BEAUTIFUL concertos in my opinion... Daniil does an amazing job with it!!

Thank you very much for this video. Mr. Trifonov your performance is so glorious, thank you. 🌷(Netherlands)

8:24 Everyone should hear this opening to the slow movement, so beautiful it brings tears to your eyes!

qui ventiduenne ormai consacrato dalla vincita del Ciaikowsky e del Rubistein ci delizia con un suono ''liquido'' morbido a volte ''brillante e lucente'' un grande interprete e anche compositore...

A rapid of Romantic outpouring by a young genius played by a young genius.

Divine. I love how they take time with the music. The melodies still flow even as the tempo gets faster.

Underrated masterpiece.

Played this concerto for my second exam at conservertory. Wish one day I can play it with a real orchestra.

Trifonov... 💞

So Fantastically beautiful….

An excellent performance and recording by everyone involved.

Cuantos colores y argumentos hay en la musica de Scriabin. Deberiamos elevarlo todo lo que podamos pára que sea mas escuchado.!!

Movement 2 is my favorite. Such a choral quality to the strings and suppleness when the piano enters with the clarinet solo. I always tear up ...then at 12:50 , I love how the bass drops and the piece turns dark, moody and very Chopin-like.

Incredibly passionate... How is this piece so unknown??

Unbelievably poignant. The slow movements of this and of the Kalinnikov Symphony No. 1 belong among the most beautiful, heartfelt moments in the classical repertoire, and yet unknown to mainstream classical audiences

Quel beau concerto !

Just Fab ! So romantic... ♥️

thanks for video and thanks for open me to this concert ... awesome !

this concerto is almost unbearably touching and moving...but i love it so !

You are encouraging me to play the piano and praising my cleaning up the room, discarding unncessesary stuff . Throwing away is not enough though. Thank you very much for praising me.

A great piece of 'romantic' music, and a superb performance.Reminds me of the 2nd movement of the Ravel Piano Concerto?

quel pianiste, je suis vraiment fan

This is so wonderful!

Beautifully and sensitively played with just the right amount of freedom. The piano sounds a bit too soft in this recording but the bass is good. I am increasingly coming to think of this man as a new Rubinstein. He plays with such total ease. He is the best young genius I have heard in a long time. Good orchestral playing too.

Consummate Artistry. Thank you sharing this. His playing is hypnotic and mesmerizing.

Que musica tan preciosa! y cuán maravillosamente la ejecuta Trifonov, el mejor pianista de su generacion, anterior fue Claudio Arrau.

It's easy to say that Trifonov does this concerto justice, with the devil's touch and extreme technical control. It's wonderful to see a blooming master (only at the age of 30) taking up such an underrated work!

Прекрасная музыка, прекрасное исполнение! Спасибо за видео, не удаляйте🙏🙏 он просто большой молодец

Cada nota tè vida pròpia .... una cascada de sensibilitat.... Fantástic el concert i el intèrpret.

Emocionant, maravellós, 👏👏👏👏👏👏❤️

Semplicemente Stupendo! Grazie per averlo pubblicato

Maravellós !!!!👏👏👏💕

Neat how when you like someone and they keep introducing more and more goodness that you never knew existed before.

bravissimo!!!

Mas romantico y profundo no puede ser!!!

FANTASTIC

Este concierto aparecía en KZfaq, el vídeo completo donde se veía también el concierto #1 Rachmaninov, pero lo sacaron, a mí me gusta ver a los músicos y ver la expresión facial inspiradora de Daniil

genial composição

MOLTO BELLO

8:42 sec mvmt 17:56 third mvmt (holy fuck)

Ничего более чувственного,чем Скрябин.

Grandiose !!!

1st mvt: 0:00 2nd mvt: 8:20 3rd mvt: 17:55

19:26 is the time stamp you're looking for 🌝

why russian composers are so good at piano concerto

Que l'ont me pardonne, car ce commentaire est destiné à la version Deutsche Grammophon Trifonov / Gergiev. Malheureusement il n'est pas possible de lui apporter un commentaire. Cet enregistrement est de toute beauté par la prestation de Daniil que j'affectionne particulièrement. Cependant le bémol vient de l'orchestre qui prends le pas sur le pianiste. Gergiev n'est pas en phase avec Trifonov. Bien souvent il l'étouffe et le 3e mouvement en est la meilleure illustration. La fin de ce mouvement où le pianiste donne toute la puissance de son jeu, est anéanti par un orchestre qui lui vole ses dernières notes époustouflantes. Pourquoi les ingénieurs du son de D.G.,qui sont pourtant de grands professionnels, n'ont pas mixer cette distorsion pour laisser la vedette au pianiste. Je suis très triste pour Daniil car il joue ce concerto avec toute sa sensibilité et sa fougue. Certains critiques ne ménagent pas Gergiev. Je laisse ces messieurs libres de leurs mots. Je n'aurai qu'une dernière observation à l'encontre de D.G. Ces messieurs ont découpé l'andante en 5 ou 6 parties. L'enchaînement entre les variations est très aléatoire. Malgré tout je vais garder cette version car Daniil y est souverain. P. R.

❤️

good

Does anyone know where this performance took place and who was the wonderfully cooperative conductor? I think this is the most successful performance I've heard of this beautiful but problematic work. I especially like the way the piano part is woven into the orchestral fabric in this performance, rather than treated as a traditional, virtuoso vehicle for the soloist..

A feeling of comforting human sorrow and suffering thrown into the vast universe. It is sadder than Rachmaninov.

22:40

👍🏽🙏🏼

That's it.

The great Josef Hofman played the 2nd movement sans orchestra...😊

wow, just wow 22:37

Wunderbar!

🎼🌹

23:28 did the percussionist just miss his queue?

Pity Scriabin didn’t write a cadenza for the 1st Movement to give a contrasting dramatic element to what is essentially a lyrical through- composed work.

1:20 5:00 7:40 10:50 14:50 15:50 17:56

Interpretazione insignificante.Ascoltate piuttosto Neuhaus e Dubrowski,insuperbili.

What's the Conductor's name & Orchestra, too?!

s,v,p the name of the orchestra and the conductor!

15:00

Wich orchestra is it ?

A l'intention de Mr. Vladibaby 79. Je ne doute pas que votre commentaire soit intéressant, mais YoTube devrait penser aux personnes qui ne parlent pas Allemand. Peut être que Mr. Vladibaby ne parle pas Francais.? Dommage je ne saurai pas ce qu'a voulu nous dire ce monsieur. Je trouverai peut être un ami qui voudra bien me traduire ce texte. Amitiés à tous. P. R.

Hvkooo

This pianist's decision comes in the (if I remember right) F major delicate bits in the 1st movement: stick strictly to tempo as written, or go with something else? He goes with something else. Something else is always available in Scriabin, but it's not free vagary. In the amazing C# pedal sequence at the end of the 1st movt the piano part is not fully visible in its elegance: but this is perhpas feature of the recording, and a choice that is always looming in Scriabin is: how to do justice to the sheer number of notes? Not so apparent here where a "piano hero" Ashkenazy approach, overpowering the orchestra is tempting and would work (Trifonov avoids it), but more with e.g. the 7th Sonata. No-one knows what to do with this, there is no right answer. Zhukov takes things slow and still can't make each phrase resound. There is a great joke "news" item in the UK Brass Eye series by Chris Morris about a drug called "Cake" which distorts the sensation of time. The drug in question is complete fiction, but in Scriabin it is real. The way Aleksandr Nikolayevich wrote (yes, even Op. 12 as well) suggests that both the player and the audience might somehow be able to wangle an unofficial side-deal with time under which everything unfolds as if as normal, but in violently varying paces, and under which everything must remain both clear and utterly intended. The practice-discipline to get Scriabin mastered (sorry: apologies - I have never _mastered_ one bit of Scriabin) is weird enough: according to this theory performers of Scriabin must not only carry the distortion of time they learned in the practice-room on stage but also develop it there and convince their audience of it. So with this in mind I admire Trifonov's 2nd movement as beautifully played but not nearly dwelling on the strange nearly enough. Let's get on to 3, which is fun... Preface: Trifonov seems to be a young, astoundingly good player. He's all over the technical fireworks of the 3rd movement. But the Scriabin Concerto is a divided vehicle anyway. It aims at transcending the mundane world of boring meat-people playing music for other boring meat-people to listen to. If your soul is not exploded by a performance of this concerto, you must be mere gross meat. Trouble is, this concerto attempts its work only with the musical tools of the _young_ Scriabin. Which puts a terrible pressure on to the performer. If the pianist doesn't upscend your meat to a higher form of energy, he or she must be shit. Or perhaps they're great but you're too mundane. But the dots on the page don't justify this. No-one can make the Scriabin Concerto what Scriabin wanted it to be. So it's hard to make it something it was never capable of being. (This is part of the fun of trying to play it). It will always sound like a young man's attempt at storming Heaven, and fall back into "piano-heroics". The piano sounds Scriabin writes are already capable of freezing blood, if blood were exposed to them, slowed down and resounding: but in this work they're drowned out by the orchestra. So it's impossible to make a proper judgment of Trifonov's playing of this piece, except the happy one that he nails it. Everything is there. It works. The piece is (I hate to say it) slight enough that this is all that matters. And (lucky bastard) he has all the technical tools to produce a truly strange performance of some of the more disturbing pieces: Sonatas 6,7,8. Where a KZfaq recording might not be enough and his presence, dedicated to making something happen, might be mindblowing. Bravo!

Dieses Klavierkonzert, auch wenn nicht eines der allervirtuosesten, hält doch einige besonders schwer zu lösende Aufgaben für den Solisten bereit: 1. der Klavierklang muss fortwährend neu definiert und justiert werden, sowohl für die solistische Aussage an sich, als auch für das zusammenspiel mit dem Orchester. Die komplette Palette an Anschlagsarten und Klangfarben wird jederzeit gefordert, die Stimmungswechsel und Texturumstellungen sind plötzlich und extrem. Es passiert oft, dass wichtige pianistische Momente, die aus dem Orchesterklang heraus entspringen, total untergehen. Nicht so bei Trifonov. Seine Palette reicht von zart und verträumt bis wild und orgiastisch und steht ihm jederzeit von A bis Z zur Disposition. 2. tempo und rubato sind hier wahre Stolpersteine. Ist man zu sparsam bei den Tempowechseln und dem rubato, wirkt das Werk verwelkt. Ist man zu grosszügig, gibt eine Sauce mit Kaugummikonsistenz. Das perfekt Timing ist kaum zu treffen und misslingt meistens auf enttäuschende Weise. Nicht so bei Trifonov. Jede noch so kleine Phrase hat die genau richtige Dauer, Richtung und Atmung und ist von A bis Z gehaltvoll und mitempfunden. 3. während die vorherigen Punkte 1. und 2. bewältigt werden, muss der Pianist auch noch seine Rolle ständig neu definieren: manchmal spielt er begleitend, manchmal als Orchestermusiker, meistens als Solist, jedoch sind die Rollenwechsel fliessend und ebenso fliessend wechselt die Führung zwischen Solist und Dirigent. Eigentlich muss man den Dirigenten als Kammermusikpartner betrachten. Abgesehen davon dass die meisten Dirigenten in dieser Rolle fachlich zu unsicher sind, fehlt auch vielen Solisten diese Flexibilität. Und wenn sie mal dazu in der Lage sind, dann sind sie oft technisch nicht sicher genug und spielen wiederum zu vorsichtig. Das Werk klingt nicht lebendig, sondern wie auf dem Seziertisch. Nicht so bei Trifinov. Unter seinen Händen pulsiert das Werk in seiner ganzen Unberechenbarkeit, stets auf höchstem pianistischem Level und immer Hand in Hand mit dem hier sehr versierten Dirigenten. Wenige minimale Synchronisationsprobleme (die fast unvermeidbar sind) können fast unbemerkt bleiben und wenn schon, dann stören sie kaum. Wenn es sie nicht gäbe, dann könnte man vergessen, dass diese grossartige Leistung eine menschliche ist. Und das wäre dann Hybris. Nun leider, alles in allem betrachtet, ist man gezwungen den Trifonov auf eine Stufe mit dem legendären Neuhaus zu setzen. Und somit kann man Hybris doch nicht vermeiden...

Кто дирижирует и каким оркестром?

The best (for me) is the performance from paul Badura Skoda ( RIP) )

This concerto is not very typical of the pianistic style of his author at the time when it was written, nor of its orchestral style. Some predecessors like Chopin and Liszt have yet an influence that is much less marked in the purely piano scores. Nevertheless, this is a very beautiful and well written concerto, with a significant role of the orchestra, which deserves to get its room among the Russian concertos of that period. Those who would like a more "scriabinist" score for piano and orchestra can hear Promehteus ('the poem of fire,', op. 60). Here, the slow movement in particular is mervellous.

8:24

What key is it in?

8:23 - mov 2

P.S.The 'dreamy' bits only!!!

It's a more moving piece than Rachmaninoff's Second Piano Concerto.

Some chords sound weird in this version. I don't know why...

Overall this is lovely, and he's really beyond reproach as an artist, but the second movement theme and variations almost dry up and die with his indulgently languorous tempo. I'm also afraid his excessive "retards" before climaxes in the first and last movements are really a miscalculation that crush the passion Scriabin intends. Just my opinion.

Trifonov is a marvellous pianis, but this interpretation is not as amazing as Maestro Ashkenazy.Too slow, too much.In my humble opinion.

Trif could have learned Gubaidulina concerto or Prok &5 instead he wasted time on this trash ! Good to record this ONLY if there are no performances then the libraries and archives will purchase but there are already too many recordings of this feeble music . Prometheus (see Argerich film of it:the only Scriabin Ive ever heard her in.3rd and 5th Sonatas would be wonderful with her but alas ...) and lives this music was stillborn I can't believe richter and Gilels and Neuhaus and many others have bothered to learn such sentimental weak stuff. I've heard this music countless times and still dont know where one mov ends and another begins. Worse the themes are forgotten as soon as stated .Finale is a sham ! Worthless. my 6 pf concerti are inestimably more valuable .

What a boring music! Nothing to compare to Rachmaninoff's exciting concertos, though brillantly played by Trifonov . Strangely the orchestra and conductor isn't mentioned....

good pianist -bad concerto

22:15