The interior sound of valkyrie is terrible too even though i prefer the exhaust

It's got one extra passenger of frontal area. More air resistance for the engine to work against.

@@amazin7006 I prefer the T.50 exhaust. Much more euphoric

@@borthwey 🤣🤣🤣 🤡

Most of the Valkyries width is crash structure like f1 cars

3,or so million dollars too. I like this but unlike you I like other hypercars just as much. These are commercials for the car remember that not a documentary. 3 seaters are hard for the driver to get in or out. Plus passenger seats are always uncomfortable. I'd rather have the T33

u forgot the affordability aspect as well!

@@allensaunders449 you're not buying a supercar/hypercar for it to be easy to get in and out of. The central driving position is a unique aspect of the driving experience of this and its spiritual predecessor the McLaren F1

@@SSC3034 it's a gimmick driving on left or right is what we all do. Of course I'm not buying one but it's a comment section for just this purpose. If I had a central driving position tandom is a better idea then 3 seat's

What color is yours?

nurbugring is technically a public road and very windy.

Imho the Nordschleife might be one of the best tracks for such a small agile car. It might not break any Lap Records but will sure be fun to drive there and around there. That greater region is nothing but hills, forrest and windy roads.

Words

Chill bro its not that deep

100% agree and he is actually a REAL customer, iirc? Like not only did he get to drive the mules and EX cars, he also paid in full for a real customer car right?

It's not a "thing" it's a work of art. People without a vocabulary use the word thing. Be better

@@saltpeter500 "be better" huh? Then it's more like pickle dick to be truly 'better'. You preserving that for someone or just your sister again? Try harder rancid richard

he's the test driver, not the marketing dept. Pure coincidence you believe he's marketing it

@@saltpeter500 you sure are salty peter... you're the thing! 😂

It's sooooooo good sounding!

The Cosworth engine is a masterpiece.

I don’t think it sounds very good for what it is. It should be raspier and more throaty

I think that it is probably the last ultimate road legal car before the turbo hybrid / 100% electric reign...

@@Hello_there_obi nah

I realize this is an unpopular opinion...but I dunno...I love the engineering but the design is hard to love. The F1 had more style. The rest of the car has grown in me, even the oversized headlights (the front end is very reminiscent of the original Porsche Boxter). But I can't get over how the rear end looks like it was bolted on rather than part of the sculpture. The T33 on the other hand is ths perfect balance of understated elegance.

@@sports2hedz542 totally agree it looks proportionally really off imo. The huge rear inlet for the fan is hideous and the rest of rear end looks like it’s designed around it. Almost like tacked on as you say.

The sound is ear-gasmic.. Love it.. is a very good sister for the Legend - F1..

You must be kidding me.. this car with bulging eyes is not even in the same league compared to the f1. The f1 is wayy wayyy more BEAUTIFUL imho

@@sports2hedz542 The Mclaren F1 was never about style and neither is this. This is pure function over form. As OP said, it's not about exaggerated spoilers and louvres just to look cool. That isn't what Gordan Murray is about. This is the ultimate drivers car money no object, as was the original Mclaren F1. Not your typical supercar to look flashy.

what do you mean? The AMG One only weighs 750kg more.

@@LarsAgerbk AMG-Pork that's her nickname lol

The amg1 and the valkarie are one trick ponies..great if your a racecar driver on a track..the t50 you can tour all over and enjoy every track along the way

Amg one has nothing interesting about it except for the fact that it has f1 engine, which needs huge maintenance every 50 thousand kilometers.

@@lightman489 Yep mate, completely different cars. This would be the best supercar out there to tour in imo :')

Definitely his f1 review is legendary 🙌

@@thehomelessproject3784 - it was the first KZfaq style review I have seen. I was only 13 at the time and completely mesmerized by it.

Agreed, there is only one other automobile that I would rather have more than the T.50. It would be a Porsche by Singer.

You can’t really compare T.50 to Valkyrie or AMG One. Just because they’re fast and expensive doesn’t mean they’re direct competitors. Valkyrie and AMG are track focused first and foremost, with on road drivability being an afterthought. This is meant to be driven on and off the track. T.50 also isn’t a hypercar in my opinion, it’s not about mind-bending horsepower or numbers like a hypercar, but it’s the ultimate example of the sum being greater than its (although individually great as well) parts. It’s for the driving experience, not a lap time. That being said, the Niki Lauda will be a different story, and I can’t wait.

@@TheStallion234 I do believe you can compare the T.50 to the Valkyrie, like you can compare the Volkswagen Beetle to a Mini Cooper or Citroen. All are different cars with different purposes but made in the same era with similar mechanicals. The T.50 is all about the power to weight ratio. It's not flashy. Form follows function. The Valkyrie is its opposite. Hands down, I'd take the T.50 over the Valkyrie. With that said, the pursuit of speed and track times bores the sh*t out of me. I know longer care. Give me a Porsche by Singer.

Engine sounds really sweet. Was expecting it to sound a bit better though to be honest. The Zonda engine seems to have more flair.

@@davidhunternyc1 You can believe whatever you want, but the fact remains that Valkyrie and AMG One were built for very different driving experiences than T.50. Form does NOT follow function in the T.50. Yes, Gordon Murray placed every part on this car under a microscope to ensure it performed exactly the way he intended, but this car is very much a combination of form and function. If it was purely form over function, it wouldn't be the car you see here. To be a true driver's car, which is what the T.50 is meant to be, you need the perfect balance of the two. The Valkyrie on the other hand was created to have function at the heart of everything. Downforce, power, driver position. It's a race car. That's what they are. It just so happens that it looks the way it does, but not because that was the prettiest way to design it.

How long since you had an eye test? (edit: as in, the AMG is bland)

And sounds much better.

Agreed. T50 is infinitely better looking; it also has a V12 and weighs 986kg, whereas the portly AMG One weighs 1700kg and has a rather highly strung V6 .......

I know this car is very light and has an amazing engine, and I love the cockpit with the glasshouse and the central driving position, but its actual looks aren't amazing. I find the Mercedes more impressive seen from the outside, and ignoring its weight disadvantage. And I mean, seriously, imagine that the Mercedes weighs only a ton. Wouldn't you think it truly looks the part?

@@borthwey Totally disagree on looks. The beauty of the F1, T50 and T33 (in my eyes) is in their understated, elegant looks in such a compact car; perfection in my eyes. I find the AMG One looks just tasteless and badly proportioned. At least the F50 had a V12 derived from Ferrari's F1 car - putting this highly strung F1 derived V6 in a road car is just pointless.

I agree. I like the T33 a little better. Both are great driving cars. This would be my choice regardless of price compared to all other hyper cars.

100 of every model/variant

They may have... it's italy after all

Gordon is a packaging king. No one gets it as compact as he does.

It's designed for the road

@@Shadowboost Aren't all cars designed for the road? That's what makes it a "car". A plane is designed for air travel and boats are designed for the water.

B roads are best ... need a car for that. Narrow and not wide and things that can get knocked off

I must say i cant help but think, like most supercars, it will be driven simply around town centers at 10mph to impress crowds. Also it seems very loud from the inside aswell.

@@cr6262 well, there’s road, and there’s track. And then there’s vehicles for off road. This is a driver’s car for sure.

All in due time…

AT LEAST 10x longer :D

@@GordonMurrayAutomotive Hey guys, please bring GMA T.50 to SOC (Supercar Owners Circle) Croatia 2nd/5th Sept.!! Driving on Croatia coastline and Islands with bunch of Hypercars !! Last year was great driving around with Mate Rimac and Horacio Pagani !! ✌️😎

Unless some alien material from outer space comes to us, I highly doubt this car will be beat.

Without question.

Especially as they are not competitors 🙄 Such a stupid comment

@@sylvaind.6786 - I mean really there is no competition with these kind of cars. They sell out the day they are released.

and usable in real life*

Completely different cars

Completely true. I have faith he will deliver an exceptional electric car in the future.

Yes what’s the point of a hypercar if it can’t take luggage.

It's a bit wider but overall smaller than a Honda City. And that's not a large car. My old model is 4.4 m long and only 1695 mm wide, under 1.7 m. It's a breeze on even narrow roads.

Take it !

Yeah James should do one in the T50 and see if it's more comfy.

The paddles are for horn and headlight flash

@@Shadowboost Thought I remembered that one...the other one I can't recall. Doh!

Gordon Murray is the designer of the McLaren F1, the greatest car ever made, until this one!!!

That would be so stupid