Truth.

@@user-bz1mz7su6r lies.

@@gabbeskillz6262 It's not a lie. The Third Reich turned oppression and mass murder into an industrial process, more efficient and horrifying, for the amount of time it existed, than ANYTHING the world experienced before or since. Every other horror imposed by other nations and regimes that resulted in more aggregate death and enslavement either occurred over many decades or even centuries; or it was diluted by cultural norms that allowed for some mitigation.

@@kenle2 I don't even remember what comment I responded to.

-subsequently wasn't proven wrong.

Unfortunately he nailed the look (prosthetics) and mannerisms with a ludicrous script. Pure fantasy put into WC mouth on multiple occasions.

J B Please elaborate.

@@catchgenerics8667 listen to the original speeches. Churchill was always calm in his delivery, never bombastic as he is often portrayed.

@@TheIfifi True but this is a movie, I'd rather it be potrayed more dramatic rather than an exact copy of wiston churchill

@@gab5012 Suppose that is down to personal opinion. I personally did not find the movie to my liking, but I was blown away from thre trailer.

LOL

*out in a

How do you get such a simple quote wrong😂😂

why

@@renatopaolofajardoquicano2230 It's funny

We need someone like him now against Gestapo Islam.

The ruinous financial cost might not have been so dear if America hadn't demanded that Britain pay back the money they borrowed in order to buy weapons and food (From America) - with interest. Most nations don't profit from their allies in a war they are jointly fighting. But Britain only finished paying back the war loans in 2006. The cancellation of the lend lease act basically forced Britain to pay extortionate amounts - or *starve*. They essentially ended up paying back twice what was borrowed. Meaning that the US actually made a huge profit on the money they lent Britain. The impact of this, is seen in the fact that Brits were still rationing food up until July 1954, nearly a decade after the wars end, the same year Germany joins NATO.

So well put.

Benjamin, the loan that was paid off in 2006 was a $4 billion dollar loan that was made after the war to keep Britain from going bankrupt. It wasn’t for arms and food during the war. Lend Lease aid to Britain during the war was in goods valued at more than $30 billion dollars in 1945 dollars. The United States never asked for or received repayment of that sum. As Churchill said in 1941, the Lend Lease Act was the most unsordid act in history.

Interestingly he had learned the proper way of speaking by reading both Shakespeare and Edward Gibbon's The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Both masterful in my opinion.

Don't say "excessively", say "exceedingly". Excessively means "too much".

@@chuckjohnson4750 "Hear, hear!"

"Churchill mobilised the English language and sent it to war."

But leadership did. He was a complete fool when it came to military matters, same as Hitler.

@@jebbroham1776 Good thing he wasn't in charge of the military then...

@@TraustiGeir he did order the Dieppe raid tho.

@@jebbroham1776 Lesson learned.

Churchill was bribed to destroy Europe and the British Empire by Strakosch.

that take looks incredibly real.

That is Anthony Eden who was Churchills closest confidant during the war and served in the foreign office. He was prime minister in the 50s.

There should be a sequel of Churchill during the war

Aye...

ReezeGoingSenseless Couldn’t! It would have been seen by Germans and bombed.

callum hardy when he gave this speech Britain wasn’t getting bombed and France was still Free

Right. Its like those last 2 harry potter movies.

Makes it more dramatic - it's a film mate.

​@@tommycrush2086 i think its meant to show the darkness enveloping europe i think

we shall fight on the beaches

“TO WAGE WAR!”

Conquer we must, as conquer we shall

Diedert Spijkerboer And in addition, Churchill never stooped to the wild gesticulations of the leader of the Reich - Churchill’s speeches were stirring because the WORDS HE USED were stirring. He let those words speak for themselves and they conveyed exactly what he intended - grim determination to prevail against the onslaught despite the odds. It was a triumph of substance over form.

Benoit Pellet I totally agree with you. I once heard a story of a German who got excited by one of Hitler's speeches and decided to read in the paper what Hitler had said. Just reading the plain words, he got completely disenchanted with it.

Benoit Pellet Adding to what you said, I think that what Churchill did so well in the dark days when Britain stood alone was that he could tell people the hard truth in such a way that they could bear it. Telling people a lie they want to hear is so much easier than telling people a hard truth without them then wanting to shoot the messenger! Given all these circumstances, it is no surprise that people still quote Churchill where appropriate (like at the time of the London terror attacks) while Hitler's words are basically forgotten.

Actually, it was the German Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels who did use first the term "Iron Curtain", in reference to the Soviet Union. It was in a Nazi newspaper, in 1943 or 44 - anyway, before Churchill. But you are right in everything else.

Hi Cborg, I found out that Churchuill only popularized the term after I made that comment. I didn't know it was originally by Goebbels - one of the few times he didn't lie, I suppose. Goebbels' lies were particularly nasty. As an example, he once said that one day they will make the Jews shut their rude lying mouths, thus saying only implicitly that (all) Jews are rude liars. It was also incredibly sick that both Goebbels and Hitler lied on purpose. Fortunately, people like Churchill saw the nazis exactly for what they were. Churchill himself had access to secret government dossiers on Germany even in the 1930s and when he became prime minister, he knew exactly what he was dealing with. I personally hate most wars, but some people, including the nazis, cannot be reasoned with. They can only be stopped by brute force. I'm pretty sure both Goebbels and Hitler were psychopaths of the worst kind and it is known that even as children, parents have no choice but to be forceful with such children, as they have no empathy and simply cannot understand why certain behaviours are bad. I once met a guy who probably had psycopathic tendencies. he seemed quite nice at first, but any interest he seemed to show proved not to be genuine. I later met him and he'd been convicted for selling homemade drugs to minors. When I pressed him about this, the only reply he gave was that "drugs aren't for everybody." he completely failed to understand why selling drugs to minors is especially wrong. The only thing that now seems to stop him is the risk of going to prison. I eventually broke of all contact with him.

In Churchull's case: He who masters the art of words can rescue the whole world

British Nerd what does it mean?

It means he's coming naked.

Matthew Johnson please look also at is fault ,

@@kartiksolanki5400 *The reason why all of Europe is not speaking German.

@@kartiksolanki5400 I do know about the Bengal famine, but most of the time charitable aid was given. Also in my eyes they were nothing more than bickering tribes that needed civilising, put it however you want idc, still the same if you ask me.

@@kartiksolanki5400 I do know about that incident, i've never argued that the British Empire did nothing wrong, my point was people completaly vilinise them and forget what good they brought to these countries . Eventhough the massacre was apparently a response to a violent protest i still don't agree with it. Also most of the tribes or states or whatever you want to call them, that you mentioned still carried out inhumane acts and were not civilised for even modern standards back then.

@@kartiksolanki5400 No, just no, before the British, India was nothing more that uncivilised people in mud huds, without the British, India would of fell to Japan's colonial expansion during ww2, take quick look Japan's colonial era then tell me the British were Brutal, India to this day is still a corrupt shithole, quite literally as well, but i forgot, everything good India has done is off Indias' back and everything bad, even things that had absolutely nothing to do with the British, was the British empires fault. Jesus this narrative gets old quick.

I’ve liked your comment but I disagree. He often lied when Britain were losing to keep moral up.

Patriots speak the same. Just about different places 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

You mean he speaks like a British patriot?

@@lizardlenny yes he does. I guess all of us liberty loving people have this in common

🇬🇧 *Sir* Winston Churchill 🇬🇧

Seems written for present times.

And the most important thing is that the only thing needed for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.

I respect the British for how they held out in WW2. I'm Irish..

@@BoldOne8760 Brits respect the Irish too

@@5implesimon Tell that to Maggie

Yea, because of one guy...

@gifaek how is that a good joke? The people I have spoken to have respected the Irish (I am British and so are most of the people I have spoken to)

In a speech by Video link to the current House of Commons Zelensky quoted Churchills fight them on the beaches Speech

How about the war for the survival of Scotland?

Albert Einstein supposedly said that one cannot prepare for peace while preparing for war. Your statement shows why he was wrong. One can only prepare for peace if one prepares for war.

Without victory, there will be no hope for survival

Beethoven,

Tokis Efford Damn! I forgot. Thanks!

Yeah, and don't forget Norman Stansfield (in The Prodessional)!

Viktor Reznov

In 60-70 years maybe, there will be a movie about Boris Johnson

@@rexcrossnet haha

Churchhill was the best functioning alcoholic in history

*state of nature

Who was the girl anyway

Goose pimples mate

Everywhere

Boris has put the traitors back in place :D

@@TheBarca1889 By having £15,000 of his holiday paid for by a Tory donor? I ain't sure Cedric

@@adamyoud6934 who was the Donor? And isn't it better than taking it from the taxpayers?

"Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times."

Wars cost money even to the victors !!

Except for all of the important things.

Some times we most give things up, lose them, so that those we love may continue to have them. The UK did nearly lose it all, but the world lies in their debt, permanently, forever.

Not our freedom tho.

Wars are expensive. And if there is a cause to go out for, this was it. Britain is still one of the richest/ militarily capable countries in the world. Britain just isnt top dog anymore, which was always going to happen. Rome, Greece and Mongolia were all the dominant forces on the planet at one point, not anymore. America will fall behind China and then China will eventually recede. Its how the world works

Even if we came a couple of years after the start of the war America heard Churchill speak. He was one of those few people in history that shall be remembered for all time.

And LEAD IT TO WAR AND LEAD IT TO VICTORYYYYY!

The English spoken word

why euler?

euler; giver of crown jewels- exp(i*pi)+1 = 0

Mind Trapped it makes sense in the context of the film. Politicians were against him.

Word is this speech really did get a chilly reception - or a mixed one at best - from parliament when it was first delivered.

@@jsears21ify the speech was cheered but from the Labour benches only

True