I am respectfully asking you why you struggle to read so much? You are clearly an intelligent person but this was incredibly hard to listen to.

Another fascinating and engrossing video as well as being significant and of considerable moment in its own right. One of the more important aspects is that it allowed to subject the fullest opportunity to set the record straight from his own view-point. For a man of honour one accepts without question that this is the absolute, unvarnished, truth. In fact, the notion of honour (or absence of honour) is, I think, more pertinent now more than at any other period in modern history especially as we are forcibly conditioned to accept the orthodox world-view absolutely without question and that to kick against the pricks becomes, at the very least uncomfortable and at the other end, potentially lethal. (I well remember the mental challenge heard during a HNH 'demonstration' a few years ago with the demonstration with repeated chanting of the cretinous and oxymoronic "We must not tolerate intolerance!" The saddest part comes at the end, where Mr Myatt notes that the whole argument hinges on "whether or not in a hundred or a thousand years there are stable communities where knowledge and reason and scholarship are valued and taught to a new generation." Oh, how right and - I fear - distressingly prescient he is.

Fascinating stuff.. thanks for sharing.

I did not decline. Myatt wanted to duel. I said ok. He never responded.

O9A is not affiliated with D.M? Then why the most important painting that is associated with a question to spot authentic o9a adherents is with his portrait?

David Matt? Why are you pronouncing it like that? It's My-att .. obviously.

The voice in o9a literature sounds very different than the one in this correspondence. I don't think its the same author.

Just out of curiosity, how do you interpret daniel 8 and in relation to matthew 24:15? Daniel 8 appears to mention a rebellion that causes desolation and matthew 24:15 mentions an abomination that causes desolation? (In my niv it does anyway, although i realise its probably not everyone's cup of tea to interpret bible passages, especially amongst the order of 9 angles) Standing in the holy place? So what should the antichrist do when he turns up? As in the singular antichrist to come at the end of time, the man of lawlessness and the man of perdition and sin, not the collective antichrist or the spirit of antichrist or some person from the past like antiochus epiphanes or nero etc. Would it make sense that it could be standing as a member of christs body, ie his holy temple? Wouldnt it then be a paradox that he would be a member of his body ie a christian and yet a man of sin and lawlessness at least to the extent he performed being a christian rather than an implicit characteristic of the identity of believing in christ over performing being a good christian? Its at least a metaphor although not offering literal unholy sacrifices in jerusalem, which could be anything from money to a pig and or a pagan idol? What are your thoughts and do you know where i could learn more? What if he sacrificed himself or was murdered like a martyr like a poisoning or something, especially if it was done by or at the behest of christians? And he doesnt perform lawlessness and isnt the man of sin or perdition anymore, wouldnt that change the prophecy and the events at the end of days? Would it kill off christianity? What if the antichrist wasnt as guilty as people made him out to be and was only bad after being mistreated by the government and denied support and still found his way back to god and atoned for his wrongdoing whilst the world stood and watched and tormented him? What would happen then? Especially if the antichrist, as either the devil or his son or henchman or whatever was in a sense at times a messenger of god or an agent of god like the jews believe? And christians only made a self fulfilling prophecy by their mistreatment of him? And the antichrist genuinely believed in jesus? And this was the devils plan all along, outsmarting the christians as he knew he wasnt as bad as he was made out to be and christians were part of the problem as they persecuted so many people throughout history in the name of killing the devil and his minions and killed thousands of innocents? As the devil knew he could turn up in the flesh and would be so mistreated he would become a metaphor for jesus by gaining a crown of thorns ie a painful experience and so everyone stumbled over him like the capstone the builders rejected as mentioned in the new testament?

If David Myatt isn’t Anton Long… Then who is?🤔

surprised you managed to get an interview with this fella

For those who wish to read my Interview with David Myatt I have published the written version in full on my new website. interzoneanalysis.com/79-2/

💯 "promo sm"