Nononon, the proper sentence is "Hey everyone, wags here from Eagle Dynamics"

C L O U D S

Was that a NF reference?

@@johanmlgaard6444 no it was a C L O U D S reference

@@CakePrincessCelestia try that high settings in a crowded mission and both mfds on camera visuals like tgp and agm65 wpn pages and see your fps drops to 20 :)

I got a big bird for you...

Me too

Drools at clouds, just hope we don't need an RTX 3080 to run them!

Glad I got 3060 ti ready. Hope it would be enough

@@jibcot8541 while someone is hoping they won’t need 3080, I hope that 3090 is enough to run these clouds on highest settings with decent fps in VR. I’m sure you won’t need 3080 just as you don’t need it now but as the saying goes you get what you pay for. Have you seen MFS2020 clouds on lowest settings? That’s what I’m talking about.

@@RUS38 we both know that's not going to happen. Even im 2.5.6 there is no way to get max settings with 3090 OC in VR.

@@freemandiy I’m not saying absolutely everything maxed out. I’m talking about clouds in this case. But will see what they bring by the end of the year.

Theoretically possible with quadtree rendering and optimization, but I can imagine this would be put on the backburner upon Vulkan API implementation makes it to us.

@@ioverfl0w or dynamic tesselation which would be perfect for hires ground.

@@norman191000 i think the latter would be more memory consumptive, quadtree rendering is overall more mathematically sound and efficient.

Glad you like them!

this would be glorious

Give it some time and im sure it will be implemented (as long as the block 50 has those features!)

god damn military technology is amazing

Thanks!

Let's call it for what it is. Want. We probably *want* the JDAM. HARM doesn't need to visually identify it's target, it homes in on radar emissions, so saying we *need* JDAMs because of clouds in a video about HARM HAS sub-modes is a moot point. Yes, clouds are going to make LGBs and Mavericks more difficult to use in situations where clouds are both dense and numerous, however that doesn't mean LGBs and Mavericks are going to be "literally unplayable" as the common mantra seems to be at the moment. JDAMs certainly can be a more accurate strike option, especially in inclement weather, but they aren't desperately *needed*. I want JDAM too, so I can enhance my mission types in all weather conditions, but it's not there yet - and this version of the F-16 is primarily a "Wild Weasel" aircraft, so it makes sense to focus on the systems that make it what it is: a SEAD jet *needs* HARM modes (which we're getting soon) and HTS (which is still being worked on, as I understand). So I get why the F-16 doesn't have JDAMs yet (key word). As frustrating as it might be for some. There are a few ways you may be able to mitigate environmental obscuration: getting below the clouds is the best option - provided it doesn't put you in range of terrain (obviously), AAA or MANPADS. If that can't be achieved, second best (for laser guided munitions) is JTAC (or buddy) lasing though this only works if the cloud base is high enough for the munition to acquire the guidance laser and allow for adjusting its flight path several seconds prior to impact if needed. The third option is to come in from another angle (depending on threat/TOT), or wait for a break in the clouds (assuming they're not static). These are things that have been done by real pilots in active warzones, such as Afghanistan, Iraq and to some extent in Syria. A good example for flying below the cloud base comes from an A-10 pilot assigned to a CAS mission at night/low light and in inclement weather. He did a TedX talk, pretty inspiring stuff. - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a72khNR818jRe5c.html You can still use laser/IR, you just have to *fly* your aircraft creatively until we eventually get JDAM. It'll make you a better sim-pilot too.

@@Cailean556 hi, thanks for a long reply on my comment; still want them. As a military veteran worked in both Irag and Afghanistan, i know it’s still able to function. But still want them. ED, thanks for hard work.

@@Elvinsilvester Yeah, I have a habit of doing that. If I'd left it at the first two lines and the last line, it seemed confrontational or accusatory (which wasn't the intended outcome) so I added context. At least, you're saying "want" now, instead of "need". :P Me too, just the latter not the former. Just have to be patient for JDAMs.

@@Cailean556 no problem! It was more kind off a joke, as everyone talked about the clouds; but Dutch translation to English isn’t always perfect grammar. Understand your point of view. Have a great day! 👍🏽

Yes, I thought I saw something different about that cockpit. The very first impression that hit my eyes

@@ernestwinslow7316 in the latest newsletter they said something about a new cockpit reflection system they’re working on for new modules, that will later be also be added to the already existing ones

Eagerly awaiting those words.

This sentence has sounds

They are coming :)

@@MattWagner Great news. I'll await eagerly!

down right

@@Zarma4074 not in A/G mode

Part of the terrain, there are lots of sites with these kinds of revetments

patch status is still "to be announced"

@@Zarma4074 31.03

Nah be a one month or more I say.. after Wags starts uploading videos its around the 1-2month mark

HAD will come later with DL/HTS. Thanks

Next Hornet update.

@@MattWagner Sweet!

Subject of next video. Thanks.

@@MattWagner Perfect, thanks ED and Matt.