Dean Radin - All Reality Consists of What Things?

  Рет қаралды 21,895

Closer To Truth

Closer To Truth

Жыл бұрын

We look around and see innumerable things and to each we give a separate name. But most things are composites, made up of smaller, more fundamental things. So digging down to bedrock reality, what are the fewest numbers of independent things? Particles, forces, fields in the physical world? Anything mental? Anything spiritual?
Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
Watch more interviews on metaphysics and reality: bit.ly/3wYuxCi
Dean Radin is a researcher and author in the field of parapsychology. He is a Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, and has taught at Sonoma State University and the Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center.
Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
Closer to Truth, hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn and directed by Peter Getzels, presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.

Пікірлер: 209
@jedsparks7324
@jedsparks7324 Жыл бұрын
It's hard to believe some things until it happens to you
@Dion_Mustard
@Dion_Mustard Жыл бұрын
i agree. it happened to me.
@Jimmy-el2gh
@Jimmy-el2gh Жыл бұрын
Exactly. I don't bother trying to explain it to those who haven't experienced it anymore. They think I'm crazy....lol
@alexhong1784
@alexhong1784 7 ай бұрын
Lol + 1 me here ,some crazy synchronicities happened to me ,dint tell any one ,family no ,friends no.😊
@3-dwalkthroughs
@3-dwalkthroughs Жыл бұрын
Vedic texts describe how the four worlds mentioned - the material, mental, Platonic and spiritual worlds - actually coexist. One can envision those worlds coexisting, if seen as layers or planes of congruent energy or reality. How one perceives those levels or energy or reality, depends on one's level of consciousness - on both material and spiritual planes of energy. Since most of science assumes reality is only matter - and that consciousness somehow arises from matter. But since science fails to explain how or why consciousness exists, we can at least consider what revealed spiritual texts have to offer, in explaining different realms realities. Handed down in Vedic text material, it is described that spirit and consciousness, both individual consciousness and Godhead/Source consciousness, existed before the manifestation of this, and other universes. In spirit, Godhead expands in various ways to expand love, one of which being expanding individual, small but identical sparks of spirit, like single photons radiated by the sun. In spirit, there is unity consciousness, feelings of loving exchange between the created sparks of spirit and Creator, are spontaneous, in a place where the material sense of time, does not exist. Having a quantity of free will, the spark can choose to separate from unity consciousness, and for this purpose, the temporary reality of material creation and it's cycles of creation and destruction, are manifested by Creator/Source. This is done to satisfy the desire of the spark of spirit to be a separate, "self" centered player, which necessitates a different reality than unity in spirit. Like heat and light come from the sun, both matter and spirit are created and controlled by God/Source. The free-will empowered adventurous/envious spark of spirit, is then covered by layers of matter both subtle and gross, namely earth, water, fire, air and ether (in their various forms) for it's sojourn in the time-ruled, temporary material body and universe. One's spirit, which is eternally conscious and connected to God/Source, is conditioned by the laws of the material nature, to self-identify with the body it inhabits. Forgetting for the moment it's eternal spiritual identity, a "false ego" self-identifies, with numerous physical and mental designations, such as gender, skin color, national allegiance, social and economic standing - all of which can change over time and incarnations. Although one's conscious spirit is covered by gross and subtle layers of matter, with it's bodily/intellectual identification, one's five senses as part of pure consciousness continuall exist, although covered by layers of material energy. One's perception, both material and spiritual, are made possible by one's consciousness, which is ever-connected to Source consciousness, although covered to various degrees, by the God-ordained, influence of matter and material energy. When one uses free will to again self-identify with Source-energy/spirit, and act in congruence with the underlying spiritual reality of self - understanding the separate nature of the material creation, layers of the material energy and misconceptions begin to dissolve, and one's unity consciousness is slowly revived. Like a recovering amnesia patient, one remembers one's real spiritual life and identity - aided by a benevolent God/Source consciousness within and without. Inconceivably Godhead/Source also has an independent, infinite personality (which is why we have a infintesimal one) who is overjoyed to see a wayward son/daughter giving up illusions and choosing to return back to home. Regarding ESP, thoughts are said to travel in the subtle element of ether. One can send and receive thoughts with others directly on the etheric plane, once the etheric body is purified from grosser coverings of matter and false-ego misconceptions. As the voluntary reconnect with God/Source takes place, the individual regains mystic, or Godlike powers, in limited degrees. Perhaps ESP could be considered as PSP - Purified Sensory Perception.... These abilities are not "extra" or outside of normal sensory perception, but inherent to one's purified conscious spiritual sensory capacity, once freed from false ego misconceptions and material identification. With revealed spiritual knowledge and practice, one can transcend the temporary illusions controlling the soul seeking separation from Source, when one seeks to return home, back to Godhead. It's a choice not only from knowledge, but from the heart.
@josephstanick8395
@josephstanick8395 Жыл бұрын
Man oh man is Radin out there! Way to push the boundaries of consciousness to the limit!
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi joseph to the contrary closer listening (and from additional sources, less confined than this channel) may readily bear fruit
@quantumkath
@quantumkath Жыл бұрын
Excellent interview! Robert Lawrence Kuhn, your quality in questioning Dean Radin is outstanding. Mr. Radin's position is sooo cool.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi katherine yah, dean is sooo cool, and understated i'm pretty sure i recall one or more sessions of dean with jeffrey mishlove (who is a pretty cool guy, himself) they cover quite a bit more ground than the short sessions here can accommodate
@MartinJutras
@MartinJutras Жыл бұрын
My favorite interview so far!
@mintakan003
@mintakan003 Жыл бұрын
Coming from a data science background, I'm somewhat skeptical of the "unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics" argument to describe the physical world, and implied with this, some Platonic realm. That's because mathematics does not always work out. It's a modeling tool. You can even see this, going from Newton to Einstein, where the former sees the former as an "approximation". (And Sabine Hossenfelder talks about Supersymmetry. But this is beyond my expertise.). And of course, in data science, you always deal with the issues of "residuals" (slight errors), overfitting, generalization, ... (But I guess, data scientists are somewhat mercenaries, in how they use mathematics.) Mathematics seems "unreasonably effective", mainly because we select for the best mathematics that describes the phenomenon.
@outisnemo8443
@outisnemo8443 Жыл бұрын
Incorrect. Reality out of sheer metaphysical necessity must by definition be constructed out of relational structures, because reality by definition is the most inclusive domain, and thus any two subparts of reality must necessarily relate to one another in a given way. Mathematics is "unreasonably" effective at describing the real world because the real world must necessarily be a mathematical structure. There's really nothing "unreasonable" about it at all.
@lc2c177
@lc2c177 Жыл бұрын
So good. Please do a full interview w Dean!
@rons5319
@rons5319 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic talk and thinking!
@sushamalkundu4252
@sushamalkundu4252 Жыл бұрын
Information at a different level...
@8xnnr
@8xnnr Жыл бұрын
Radin served on dissertation committees at Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center, and was former President of the Parapsychological Association.
@Life_42
@Life_42 Жыл бұрын
We need to discover more and faster!
@browngreen933
@browngreen933 Жыл бұрын
How can there be "another realm of existence"? It seems to me that everything that exists is part of the same unified, non-divisible whole -- Existence with a capital "E."
@markstipulkoski1389
@markstipulkoski1389 Жыл бұрын
Justin Riddle has created a whole video series on "Quantum Consciousness", a course he taught at UC Berkeley for 7 years. It covers a lot of speculative theories that attempt to explain the mysteries that Radin speaks of. Riddle considers himself a "curator" of these theories, not necessarily a disciple. Any fan of CTT who leans more toward science will like his channel. I much prefer CTT's meandering strings music intro over Dr. Riddles Renaissance music intro. You have to get past that.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
i subscribed and am standing by with a similar title, 'quantum of conscience' is a good channel, for those who are up to it (and are ok with cats) it is hard work, as host matt is relentless in his bulldoggery, chasing down and ferreting out the metaphysical
@AdamHMortimer
@AdamHMortimer Жыл бұрын
Very interesting
@ismael22622
@ismael22622 Жыл бұрын
tks yo share‼best regards
@neththom999
@neththom999 Жыл бұрын
Dean good. As always.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
heh heh truth, and listeners are grateful
@CreationTribe
@CreationTribe Жыл бұрын
I'm extremely skeptical when it comes to ESP and OBEs etc. What I can say for certain is that Dean Radin is a sincere seeker and his labs perform solid science; which is something that is extremely lacking in other labs that investigate these topics.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi creation perhaps plenty of labs lack rigor, but dean (and team) are not the only ones doing a proper job jeffrey mishlove has dean and other real scientists who have done the work (and read the legitimate studies) on 'new thinking allowed' and (older) 'thinking allowed' when they converse on air re parapsychology science mainstream rejection, they just smile and shrug despite what they know from tracking compelling studies, parapsychology remains tabu 'cause correct-think, and who holds the purse strings this, after over a century of sufficient proofs for anyone unbiased
@CreationTribe
@CreationTribe Жыл бұрын
@@friendoengus My apologies - I wasn't trying to imply that Radin was the only sincere scientist researching these topics; simply that there's a lot of room for snakeoil manufacturing. :)
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
@@CreationTribe no apologies needed just aiming for a little traction, in a healthy direction for our kind the rig is long-entrenched part of the narradigm we're all accustomed to that profit is with the dean-like characters and crews nice finding him at this channel refreshing
@user-ut2bw2zp4h
@user-ut2bw2zp4h 6 ай бұрын
DOMINANDO O PODER DE ACREDITAR ACREDITAR NO SUCESSO
@SirLothian
@SirLothian Жыл бұрын
To me, this is a lot of speculation with not one single piece of actual evidence that anybody can point to. While it is interesting to speculate on, there are many such things to speculate about and we should not give this any particular credence. It is no surprise that it follows math so closely. Picture if it did not. If when you threw an object, it only approximately followed Newton's or Einsteins laws... That would mean that the orbits of the planets might also not be exact and perhaps unstable. Chaos would ensue
@csikjarudi
@csikjarudi Жыл бұрын
I second this.
@paulusbrent9987
@paulusbrent9987 Жыл бұрын
The last sentence is powerful.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
good catch! thank you
@GradyPhilpott
@GradyPhilpott Жыл бұрын
Radin expresses himself very articulately, but what he seems to lack, based on some cursory Googling, is evidence, even after years of study of this supposed phenomenon.
@LVHMCop
@LVHMCop 25 күн бұрын
He has written some books. You can read them to get a better perspective on his thoughts
Жыл бұрын
All ideas get problematic. When you have an idea, you can make answers and questions of it.
@Alwaysdoubt100
@Alwaysdoubt100 Жыл бұрын
It means that fairies exists, gnomes exists, werewolves exists.
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104 Жыл бұрын
and hobbits with big, hairy feet!
@wayneasiam65
@wayneasiam65 Жыл бұрын
Lover Robert Kuhn's channel Closer to Truth. I wonder...when we think , the words seem to emanate from our speech areas, not from our brains. I bet one day a device sensitive enough will be able to read and capture our u spoken thoughts. A very sensitive microphone near the larynx.
@behmog
@behmog Жыл бұрын
In my opinion, ESP is perhaps the perception of the parallel probabilities to the reality (which is the projection of the most probable probability). In other words, the reality we’re experiencing is only one out of X powered by Y probable realities, so vast that our minds cannot handle even a fraction of it. And ESP exists because we may willingly or unwillingly make contact with the other probabilities, which can be contacted by other people as well. As a Data Scientist, I can look at it from the Data perspective. Each N byte binary data block (i.e. 100 bytes) would fit into it (2^(8x100)-1) different combinations of binary data, while each can be interpreted as a unique number. No storage disk in the world can store such a database containing all the probabilities that can fit into only 100 bytes (1/14th of an old floppy disk). If we assume the reality as an imaginary database of all combinations of data in a 100-byte data block, our reality is only one unique number out of the unimaginable set of unique numbers. In this case, ESP means having contact with a small part of another number, which might have common sequence of numbers with the corresponding number to our reality, which might be experienced by another person. Collective experiences and ESP, as well as many other ideas and theories in physics, mathematics, etc. can be interpreted in meaningful ways if we look at our reality as only one out of infinite number of realities. In my opinion, everything is built from Information in its purest form, which might be equivalent to the number of particles in the universe powered by the number of ways each particle can change, powered by the number of every effective parameter. On a personal level, I experience ESP in a highly observable manner not only to me but also to my friends. I’m very glad that scientists and the mainstream scientific community is beginning to consider such matters more seriously.
@user-ut2bw2zp4h
@user-ut2bw2zp4h 6 ай бұрын
O SUCESSO NA VIDA DEPENDE UNICAMENTE DE INSISTÊNCIA E AÇÃO Emerson
@johnjdumas
@johnjdumas Жыл бұрын
Two facts: 1. the body produces about 100 watts of infrared light. 2. Devices exist that communicate using infrared light. It is not unreasonable to suggest infrared light may be felt between beings. Tesla and proportional length antennas have proved that harmonic frequencies are both affected by the base-generated frequency. Amplified feedback loops are possible.
@kratomseeker5258
@kratomseeker5258 Жыл бұрын
i would love to talk to the host of this show on a personal level to talk about these things with him. because the people around me just dont get it all.
@JungleJargon
@JungleJargon Жыл бұрын
How many times have you been playing a game with other people and everyone thinks of the same thing at the same time? How many times have you been to the same movie twice on the same day and people respond or laugh at different things in the movie?
@kratomseeker5258
@kratomseeker5258 Жыл бұрын
i figured this out alittle while ago about 3 years ago to be honest. and i do believe there is something to it. i think there is a collective consciensness that is guiding what really exists. think about this everything we wished was possible in the past has to come to be true we wished you could talk to someone and video chat with them from a distance and even from a watch and all that came true in a very short time, now granted it has alot to do with technology but nonetheless you can think of other examples before technology. and hey i wish i was here maybe thats why i am. but i think its kinda strange how we wants something mentally and it comes to be. well we do push for reallity to be how we want that is why people believed in witches and crazy things that did not exist but the belief did and people still to this day believe it. but i do realize that anything possible in technology and software is also possible in out reality. you can teleport in a game you COULD also teleport in reality we poved that with particles but well if it is reasonably possible is a whole different conversation for a person to come out of that teleporter exactly the same.
@user-ut2bw2zp4h
@user-ut2bw2zp4h 6 ай бұрын
SUCESSO FINANCEIRO
@haroonaverroes6537
@haroonaverroes6537 Жыл бұрын
to concise: human logic is the key, the better logic the closer to the correct formula, no one give humans any knowledge, and there is no imaginary world to get knowledge from ! humans can figure out the laws of physics only through hard work and good logic. human logic is universal, that means that humans can master science, and that human logic can work anywhere even in other universe with different laws of physics.
@constructivecritique5191
@constructivecritique5191 Жыл бұрын
Trying to define reality is like defining God. We know a few things, that's all? No, knowing one thing is equal to knowing all things in that we know it effects things.
@koonigallery2107
@koonigallery2107 Жыл бұрын
The universe and everything in it, is one thing, consciousness of the individual is part of the universe beginning to understanding itself. The convergence of information, innovation and creativities, conflicts and all of human experience, before us and after us, is only a fraction of that growing understanding and is driven by an inherent curiosity which has sprouted from cellular organisms over billions of years. Whilst we are individual we are also one, no different from the mountains or oceans, all one thing. The universe is fluid, and in time, we as humans only occupy a microscopic fraction of it. In greater time too our reference non of us will be human and the universe will know it's self more, as the entropy of matter changes, organisms evolve further, and technological advances enable us to explore deeper into space. The universe is awake.
@jamesruscheinski8602
@jamesruscheinski8602 Жыл бұрын
Could nature and life have a common subjectivity?
@PetraKann
@PetraKann Жыл бұрын
Things?
@owencampbell4947
@owencampbell4947 Жыл бұрын
Smart people know that "repetition" is the key for so called, "collective thinking". There is no secret about that, a repeated lesson over and over, gets memorized and that's the basic for all collective thinking, with some few differences, but the main subject remains the topic. That is the use of consciousness, that confuses the purpose of consciousness. Consciousness has infinite potential in knowledge, but it requires the help of the sensors, if it is mislead, we see the results in the differences of awareness. Reality they say, is all kind of illusion, simulation, holographic, but not what it really is, our daily experience and what makes us talk about. We are the only species that is aware of reality, if correctly introduced and not mislead in a world of particles. If reality is an illusion, then everything else is an illusion, atoms, particles, quantum physics, etc. They wouldn't shoot rockets to the moon and mars if they weren't sure they exist.
@user-ut2bw2zp4h
@user-ut2bw2zp4h 6 ай бұрын
PENSAMENTOS DE SUCESSO CONSCIENTE
@mannyneyra6940
@mannyneyra6940 Жыл бұрын
Laws and order of the physical then throw in consciousness
@martinwilliams9866
@martinwilliams9866 Жыл бұрын
You don't require psi in order to have intersubjectivity & as the physical is related to Physics it requires abstract mathematics including incompleteness, therefore physicalism is incomplete. The "conventional wisdom" of science is Empiricism, which means sensory experience, which means it ain't there until it's experienced, the idea that it's always was there is slipping over to physicalism, not the same "thing".
@constructivecritique5191
@constructivecritique5191 Жыл бұрын
There are multiples of worlds all in one world. Our imagination is instrumental in the creation of new worlds and new things in our worlds. That fact is not a problem because the one world this all exists in is managed by an infinity of order.
@899547
@899547 Жыл бұрын
I recently wrote three books that should anyone closer to the truth. Truth takes on many faces that most people run from...not to.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi ronald what are the titles? is there a link to pdf (or such) versions?
@jamesruscheinski8602
@jamesruscheinski8602 Жыл бұрын
Might there be subjective in nature, as well as life?
@igor.t8086
@igor.t8086 Жыл бұрын
Not merely “physical”, not exclusively “quantum”, not entirely “statistical” - but still profoundly important (and yet obscured or neglected or denied): information++ (™®© Igor, 2022-08-27)
@bouzoukiman5000
@bouzoukiman5000 Жыл бұрын
That's all very speculative
@zoranvelickovic8814
@zoranvelickovic8814 Жыл бұрын
Our brain are limited to understand only existence. We don't have access to some higher realms. We can only try to simulate them with logic. But this assumptions is already wrong because it's part of reality. 🤔
@jamesruscheinski8602
@jamesruscheinski8602 Жыл бұрын
Can an imaginary world be experienced from time (future)?
@yifuxero5408
@yifuxero5408 Жыл бұрын
Reality is Consciousness AS the universe. There is a shared experience, and this can be proved, but the proof can't be communicated. No problem. Access "Mahamritunjaya mantra - Sacred Sounds Choir" and listen to it for 5 min per day for at least two weeks. This is the Transcendental Absolute, Sat-Chit-Ananda. The focus of this discussion is misplaced. It's not thoughts we're looking for (Star Wars - "That's not the Droid we're looking for"). We're looking for the ABSOLUTE collectivity, non-dual and non-relative, but containing all things, AS Consciousness.
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104 Жыл бұрын
So many people imagined that Jesus would return. If imagination make things happen why hasn't that happened?
@rileyhoffman6629
@rileyhoffman6629 Жыл бұрын
Perhaps Radin's 'collective' is another argument for impersonal consciousness as fundamental. ESP is not 'extra' at all, but just one of an infinite number of artifacts from other worlds our own species' evolution has not required us to know.
@JustAThought01
@JustAThought01 Жыл бұрын
Why do we seek knowledge? What is the advantage of theorizing a reality beyond the reality delivered by our five senses? We have all the information we need to make decisions about how to act based our sensory information and the rational, logical analysis of that information.
@JustAThought01
@JustAThought01 Жыл бұрын
We should be basing our actions on knowledge (true statements of fact) rather than unfounded opinion. No matter how many people believe the unfounded opinion to be true.
@JustAThought01
@JustAThought01 Жыл бұрын
@@visancosmin8991, reality seems to be presented in the form of matter, energy and time.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi edmond is it so, that we are limited to five senses? how do you understand intuition? we seek knowledge to learn, don't we? what is puzzling about this?
@JustAThought01
@JustAThought01 Жыл бұрын
@@friendoengus, intuition is based on intelligent analysis of the information we possess and our ability to project the future. We gain knowledge to enable us to make better choices to improve our lives. This knowledge should have a factual basis.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
​@@JustAThought01 might there be over-adherence to what one limitedly considers factual? returning to my questions, with an openness to new perspectives, may prove profitable
@davidrandell2224
@davidrandell2224 Жыл бұрын
QM classicalized in 2010: Juliana Mortenson website Forgotten Physics uncovers the ‘hidden variables ‘ and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie,Planck,Bohr etc. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon. A million people postpone tomorrow’s trip to the beach due to belief- weather forecasters 100 percent chance of rain- yet tomorrow is sunny; cosmic consciousness fails. Such noise.
@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Жыл бұрын
(2:00) *DR: **_"This concept of an isolated physical world made up of particles becomes a little bit blurry."_* ... Questioning what constitutes reality is not a complex question; it has an easy answer: Reality is everything (thoughts, mathematics, language, love, apathy, retrospect, time, life, imagination, etc.). Reality is anything that moves one existential step above the threshold of absolute nothingness. So, if all that existed was a single nondimensional number (i.e., the number 1), then that single number represents "reality." Once something breaches the realm of nonexistence, from that point forward, you can classify it at different levels of reality based on its structure (i.e., physical, metaphysical, imaginative, speculative, dimensional, nondimensional, matter, field, etc.). Something like *nonphysical mathematics* absolutely represents "reality" just like the *physical calculator* that exploits it.
@johnyharris
@johnyharris Жыл бұрын
I think his rather silly point is that ESP and Telepathy exist as concepts but not as phenomena, therefore reality becomes a little blurry. His argument says that this blurriness allow concepts to conjure phenomena. Sure, he says it's speculative but then seems to complain because enough people don't take ESP seriously enough it isn't conjured it into reality. 🤨
@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Жыл бұрын
@@johnyharris *"I think his rather silly point is that ESP and Telepathy exist as concepts but not as phenomena"* ... Agreed. Although I do believe there is a interconnectivity happening between all things (information). *" Sure, he says it's speculative but then seems to complain because enough people don't take ESP seriously enough it isn't conjured it into reality"* ... Because I posit that everything exists to generate more and more information, there is no room for ESP. If two people are sharing the same thought, then one of them is redundant. 8 billion purposely separated information generators (humans) crank out a heII of a lot more information than 8 billion clones that would all be thinking and doing the exact same thing.
@tom-kz9pb
@tom-kz9pb Жыл бұрын
Deep reality is probably something beyond physics and the reach of science, Physics says that the basic building blocks are maybe quarks, or Higgs field, or strings, but that is not "deep reality". Deep reality is the explanation as to why there should be such things as quarks, or Higgs field, or strings. No one has a clue, and probably our brains are not built to allow us to comprehend, anyway. Yet still, we urgently want to know, and must bang our heads on an impenetrable wall. My best attempt at feeble understanding is to say that the most basic building blocks of deep reality are probably these things: paradox, double negatives, circular definitions, perversity, random caprice, semantical confusion. I maintain that this statement cannot be proven or disproven, and while not very good, is probably as good as any other that will ever be.
@ptgannon1
@ptgannon1 Жыл бұрын
I don't think I heard him explain how this could happen. We know from quantum field theory what interacts with the fundamental particles we're comprised of (mostly quarks and electrons). If this ESP thing is interacting with those particles, we should see it, or have unexplained interactions. This is the same problem for gods, devils, souls or ghosts. To be relevant, they have to shove around quarks and electrons, and if they were doing this, as I understand it, we would know it beyond reasonable doubt. I'm kind of chuckling, thinking about manifesting Zeus through group consciousness. Is that how we got Trump? :)
@SukhenM
@SukhenM Жыл бұрын
It appears as if only consciousness is true rest all is an illusion. This physical world exists as long as our senses are active.
@jjcm3135
@jjcm3135 Жыл бұрын
The apparition of Fatima (remember it was predicted) the odd phenomena of the sudden drying of the torrential rain on people AMD the land and the 50,000 or so people who witnessed it (many atheists wrote about what they saw) cannot be dismissed easily. But when you begin to look there are numerous recorded instances of such inexplicable happenings. Science just buried it’s head in the sand when it comes to them.
@gracerodgers8952
@gracerodgers8952 Жыл бұрын
And people live and die from collective mind preference and reproach...
@longcastle4863
@longcastle4863 Жыл бұрын
The one tiny problem for esp is there's absolutely not a single shred of evidence for it...
@willrose5424
@willrose5424 Жыл бұрын
He wrote a book about meditation giving superpowers. 🦋
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi will what is the title? monarch is king of butterflies do you concur that meditation gives superpowers, or 'kingly' powers?
@willrose5424
@willrose5424 Жыл бұрын
@@friendoengus supernormal.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
@@willrose5424 normal and supernormal, i guess most of us can use all the help we can get
@specialbeamcharlie7250
@specialbeamcharlie7250 Жыл бұрын
I have a personal theory that puts evolution or the concept of it (The Spirit of Evolution) in its own dimension. And whispers into the Matter that makes up the physical world "i need a perfect body".
@tonyatkinson2210
@tonyatkinson2210 Жыл бұрын
Evolution doesn’t result in prefect bodies . It ends up with “good enough” bodies
@gene4094
@gene4094 Жыл бұрын
Arbitrary reality?
@jamesruscheinski8602
@jamesruscheinski8602 Жыл бұрын
Is it possible for imaginary world in time become real in space?
@HakWilliams
@HakWilliams Жыл бұрын
All reality consists of... Possibility
@jeffkalina7727
@jeffkalina7727 Жыл бұрын
Our science is flawed in ways we can not imagine.
@jordenflorence5294
@jordenflorence5294 Жыл бұрын
If all particles are quantum entangled and brains are made of atoms that follow the laws of quantum mechanics then something the other side of the Universe could be altering states of the brain
@treasurepoem
@treasurepoem Жыл бұрын
I always enjoy listening to Dean Radin's thoughts and ideas. I first heard of his ideas in the movie, The secret. 1:33 *Shared existence* is exactly what I believe God does to create humans. It occurs when our bodies created by God also receive His spirit, which then creates our soul (our life, consciousness), our shared existence with God and how God sees in secret. I've also had precognition type of dreams that came true, a few that were major news events. My dreams would happen within 3 days or they wouldn't ever occur, but the majority of them did happen. I stopped myself from having them when I read in the bible that it wasn't something that God allowed. Matthew 6:4-6 King James Version 4 That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly. 5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly. John 15:5 King James Version 5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
@jedsparks7324
@jedsparks7324 Жыл бұрын
I see you've had cataract surgery. How do you explain that? Reality can be fun
@simulationsecrets6540
@simulationsecrets6540 Жыл бұрын
These four words describe everything: It’s a Simulation, bro 😎
@donkansas8934
@donkansas8934 Жыл бұрын
Prove thoughts do not interact with dark matter
@stephenwatts2649
@stephenwatts2649 10 ай бұрын
From the No-Thing thus sprang the Everything - a spiritual event entirely consistent, incidentally, with what your scientists call The Big Bang Theory. As the elements of all raced forth, time was created, for a thing was first here, then it was there - and the period it took to get from here to there was measurable. Just as the parts of Itself which are seen began to define themselves, "relative" to each other, so, too, did the parts which are unseen. God knew that for love to exist - and to know itself as pure love - its exact opposite had to exist as well. So God voluntarily created the great polarity - the absolute opposite of love - everything that love is not - what is now called fear. In the moment fear existed, love could exist as a thing that could be experienced. It is this creation of duality between love and its opposite which humans refer in their various mythologies as the birth of evil, the fall of Adam, the rebellion of Satan, and so forth. Just as you have chosen to personify pure love as the character you call God, so have you chosen to personify abject fear as the character you call the devil. This mythology has been mankind's early attempt to understand, and tell others in a way they could understand, a cosmic occurrence of which the human soul is deeply aware, but of which the mind can barely conceive. In rendering the universe as a divided version of Itself, God produced, from pure energy, all that now exists - both seen and unseen. In other words, not only was the physical universe thus created, but the metaphysical universe as well. The part of God which forms the second half of the Am/Not Am equation also exploded into infinite number of units smaller than the whole. These energy units you would call spirits. In some of your religious mythologies it is stated that "God the Father" had many spirit children. This parallel to the human experience of life multiplying itself seems to be the only way the masses could be made to hold in reality the idea of the sudden appearance - the sudden existence - of countless spirits in the "Kingdom of Heaven." In this instance, your mythical tales and stories are not so far from ultimate reality - for the endless spirits comprising the totality of Me are, in a cosmic sense, My offspring. My divine purpose in dividing Me was to create sufficient parts of Me so that I could know Myself experientially. There is only one way for the Creator to know Itself experientially as the Creator, and that is to create. And so I gave to each of the countless parts of Me (to all of My spirit children) the same power to create which I have as the whole. This is what your religions mean when they say that you were created in the "image and likeness of God." This doesn't mean, as some have suggested, that our physical bodies look alike (although God can adopt whatever physical form God chooses for a particular purpose). It does mean that our essence is the same. We are composed of the same stuff. We ARE the "same stuff"! With all the same properties and abilities - including the ability to create physical reality out of thin air. My purpose in creating you, My spiritual offspring, was for Me to know Myself as God. I have no way to do that save through you. Thus it can be said (and has been, many times) that My purpose for you is that you should know yourself as Me. This seems so amazingly simple, yet it becomes very complex - because there is only one way for you to know yourself as Me, and that is for you first to know yourself as not Me. Now try to follow this because this gets very subtle here. There is one way I could have caused all of My spiritual children to know themselves as parts of Me - and that was simply to tell them. This I did. But you see, it was not enough for Spirit to simply know Itself as God, or part of God, or children of God, or inheritors of the kingdom (or whatever mythology you want to use). As I've already explained, knowing something, and experiencing it, are two different things. Spirit longed to know Itself experientially (just as I did!). Conceptual awareness was not enough for you. So I devised a plan. It is the most extraordinary idea in all the universe - and the most spectacular collaboration. I say collaboration because all of you are in it with Me. Under the plan, you as pure spirit would enter the physical universe just created. This is because physicality is the only way to know experientially what you know conceptually. It is, in fact, the reason I created the physical cosmos to begin with - and the system of relativity which governs it, and all creation. Once in the physical universe, you, My spirit children, could experience what you know of yourself - but first, you had to come to know the opposite. To explain this simplistically, you cannot know yourself as tall unless and until you become aware of short. You cannot experience the part of yourself that you call fat unless you also come to know thin. taken to the ultimate logic, you cannot experience yourself as what you are until you've encountered what you are not. This is the purpose of the theory of relativity, and all physical life. It is by which you are not that you yourself are defined. Now in the case of the ultimate knowing - in the case of knowing yourself as the Creator - you cannot experience your Self as creator unless and until you create. And you cannot create yourself until you un-create yourself. In a sense, you have to first "not be" in order to be. Do you follow? Stay with it. Of course, there is no way for you to not be who and what you are - you simply are that (pure, creative spirit), have been always, and always will be. So, you did the next best thing. You caused yourself to forget Who You Really Are. Upon entering the physical universe, you relinquished your remembrance of yourself. This allows you to choose to be Who You Are, rather than simply wake up in the castle, so to speak. It is in the act of choosing to be, rather than simply being told that you are, a part of God that you experience yourself as being at total choice, which is what, by definition, God is. Yet how can you have a choice about something over which there is no choice? You cannot not be My offspring no matter how hard you try - but you can forget. You are, have always been, and will always be, a divine part of the divine whole, a member of the body. That is why the act of rejoining the whole, of returning to God, is called remembrance. You actually choose to re-member Who You Really Are, or to join together with the various parts of you to experience the all of you - which is to say, the All of Me. Your job on Earth, therefore, is not to learn (because you already know), but to re-member Who You Are. And to re-member who everyone else is. That is why a big part of your job is to remind others (that is, to re-mind them), so that they can re-member also. All the wonderful spiritual teachers have been doing just that. It is your sole purpose. That is to say, your soul purpose.
@donkansas8934
@donkansas8934 Жыл бұрын
If a photon is a q u a r k and a wave then why cannot a thought also be a wave and then when it goes through the double slit of your mind it's turned into a particle or a thought. Sound waves are turned electrochemically into understandable vibrations in the brain. Thoughts are not different. If the eye is receiving light and turning it into information is that not a form of photosynthesis? Is that not a transfer of energy. Your assumption is the thru glucose we are using our own energy to translate this information however that is an egotistical assumption and you have no proof that that wavelength energy is not transferred like photosynthesis into the body.
@mbiriviri
@mbiriviri Жыл бұрын
Everything that Radlin says or posits is based on “if ESP is real… “ Apparently he thinks it’s so because he says it’s so - - you can see why he would be a little disinterested in “science “ Where do you just can’t say something is so because you believe it. Oh and there are lots of explanations for why many many people will “see” the same thing in the sky for example. Especially today with so much research being done on vision and “seeing” We know that we don’t actually see what we think we see I and that the brain plays a big part in “what “we see. So everyone hears or reads about people seeing something in the sky and then their brain becomes prepped to change whatever they’re looking at into what others are saying they’re seeing. Mass hysteria -seeing UFOs or signs in the sky - ain’t ESP… yeh, if ESP were true….
@keithrelyea7997
@keithrelyea7997 Жыл бұрын
If, If, If, If,If,----------
@attilaszekeres7435
@attilaszekeres7435 Жыл бұрын
You are dangerously deluded or missinformed. The existence of psi-phenomena is indisputable, and the physical reality of UFOs has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. We have a wealth of experimental evidence for psychic functioning, particularly in the area of micro-PK. The effect size is small but statistically significant, leaving little doubt that psi exists. The existence of UFOs is even more certain, with thousands of eyewitness accounts and physical evidence. Physical and eyewitnesses' testimony, video footage, radar data and corroborating evidence from multiple countries that there are things flying around that are not part of our conventional technology. The Pentagon reported about 400 UFO encounters and various scientific coalitions have been formed recently to look into these sightings. Even the NASA has joined the effort.
@MYshamanEYE
@MYshamanEYE Жыл бұрын
yeah i wrote the fellow a letter asking a simple what do ya think of this? kinda thing ,.. he was a total arsehole ,.. said i needed a therapist because i wanted to know what he thought about the idea of our higher self helping us here in 3/4 d ... looked down on me for being a disabled veteran ,... guy treates others like human garbage unless he wants something from you.,,,
@Dion_Mustard
@Dion_Mustard Жыл бұрын
Keep an open mind...I never used to believe in Lucid Dreams and Out of Body states until I experienced both of these things. I rest my case.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
yep those who do, know for themselves, and incontestably thanks for the relevant testimony and helpful guidance
@lucifer.Morningstar369
@lucifer.Morningstar369 Жыл бұрын
How could you not believe in lucid dreaming? Well documented. Out of body experience is real but more tricky sense it is subjective and the subject can only prove to themselves that it is real. They even have cia documents on it
@kos-mos1127
@kos-mos1127 Жыл бұрын
A Lucid Dream and Out of Body state are the same.
@jbasfilhful
@jbasfilhful Жыл бұрын
@@kos-mos1127 No, They are not.
@johnyharris
@johnyharris Жыл бұрын
If the positron was conjured into existence simply because a lot of effort and minds were focused on its discover, then by the same token why haven't we conjured dark matter into existence?
@divertissementmonas
@divertissementmonas Жыл бұрын
If "dark matter" hadn't been 'conjured' into existence, how is it that you can speak about it? Many minds are working on it with focused attention. Many more minds will then accept their evidence... Abracadabra! Great comment btw!
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi johny excellent question over a century of looking into it, with how many billions spent, and zero yield (except 'try something else') so we see limits to the idea no matter how many praying as hard as possible, unicorns just don't show up
@keithrelyea7997
@keithrelyea7997 Жыл бұрын
@@friendoengus You have such pure brut physical facts to contend with if you ask why there are certain physical obesevations. These arn't some imaginations, ask an astrophysicist why they postulate dark mater. They will not say their questions force the existance of dark matter into existance they will say they observe, ask, conjecture, augue, force futher proof, etc.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
@@keithrelyea7997 re dark matter, isn't it trying to find unaccounted-for weight, expected from observations but they looked (largely chasing paychecks) in the wrong places (math, and for over a century) no wonder the fail is so huge! i think the smarter ones who really looked found out the missing weight is accounted for pretty nicely by space microdust and plasma; no shortage of those another century or so, as the funding runs dry, the 'scientists' following the narradigm/money/status will fall into line fail compounding fail decade after decade doesn't suggest 'keep repeating the same', rather 'try something else' making up baloney with fancy math can get painfully expensive, as in dark matter, black holes, big bang and we're the ones paying for it
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
in fairness, there had to have been legit experiments about alleged dark matter outcomes were 'did not find it', increasing evidence it is not there
@whitefiddle
@whitefiddle Жыл бұрын
I love it every time these people open their mouths. Every cotton'-pickin' time!
@Anton_Sh.
@Anton_Sh. Жыл бұрын
Wouldn't all the damned astrology work then ??
@donkansas8934
@donkansas8934 Жыл бұрын
Prove that my thoughts or that I have no effect on dark matter
@haroonaverroes6537
@haroonaverroes6537 Жыл бұрын
that is not true at all, each individual is an independent entity, humans contact each other unknowingly, some thing similar to wireless connection nowadays. there is far more deeper and advanced system than so-called quantum mechanics nowadays "nothing would come into existence without science, that is why humans use science to figure out what is going on".
@chayanbosu3293
@chayanbosu3293 Жыл бұрын
Lord Krishna says our existence consist of 3 levels 1. gross body 2.subtle body i.e mind, intellect and ego 3.Soul.Now conciousness emarges from soul and mind is the interface between outer world and soul.
@S3RAVA3LM
@S3RAVA3LM Жыл бұрын
Great video. He must have studied much. Only if you are a true Seeker, Read the ancient books on metaphysics, There's no authors or experts today that comes close to their level of Intellect and Wisdom. Learning from modern experts is limiting the true studies that you could be practicing right now. Either fit in with a consensus, go along to get along and be validated, or walk the hero's path.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi s3 which ancient books on metaphysics do you recommend most highly?
@S3RAVA3LM
@S3RAVA3LM Жыл бұрын
@@friendoengus Egyptian, Indian, Greek texts.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
@@S3RAVA3LM thank you any one of these cultures has thousands of books and essays will you share some of your favorite titles and authors? herodotus' 'history of the persian wars' was important for me it puts a great deal of light on human nature, and what we can expect from collections of humans shanti deva's 'the way of the bodhisattva' is potent (though i've barely scratched the surface) an example quote- 'as to your enemies, leave them' is a delightfully pithy gem, worth a tattoo
@S3RAVA3LM
@S3RAVA3LM Жыл бұрын
@@friendoengus enneads of plotinus, periphyseon, philosophy as a rite of rebirth, Plato complete works, a.k coormaraswamy, Upanishads, Bible, iamblichus theurgy of the soul, meister eckhart complete works, Bhagavad Gita, the light of Egypt t. Burgoyne, the unknown God, the Universal One
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
@@S3RAVA3LM great! now we're talkin' several of these are already near the top of my stack, (recommended by philosophy scholar/linguist ken wheeler of kentucky, an iconoclast benefactor, though he might deny the latter term) including coormaraswamy, (whose family gave ken rights to some works) periphyseon is another top ken recommendation (though at a glance, i fear may be over my head) gita and bible, not so much (bibles have been through the rinse, change, mistranslate cycles too many times, albeit still have some plums) the others i can now look into some many thanks
@christophercousins184
@christophercousins184 Жыл бұрын
Well, I gotta say that I feel no closer to the truth after this one... Yawn.
@ChildofGod98765
@ChildofGod98765 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Jesus. The Lord has given me strength, to keep going, even though I want to give up. I have two beautiful boys both are autistic. My husband passed away years ago. I’m all alone. I lost my job over declining the vaccine. LIKE MANY OTHERS! I declined due to my pre existing health conditions lupus and heart disease. I’ve been struggling to provide for myself and my children since losing my job from Forsyth hospital. I’m now waitressing, and I’m thankful, but I’m not making nearly enough to get by. Every month is a battle to not end up on the streets with my two children. I’m constantly in fear of losing my home. To even think about being on the streets with two young children is terrifying. But even as I face homelessness seemingly every month. I have faith, God will provide. With GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE! Faith over fear.
@youaresomeone3413
@youaresomeone3413 Жыл бұрын
Well unfortunately God has nothing to do with this life that's why we're here and God isn't. Free will means we are here to do and make it what we want this is why he doesn't interfer or intervien
@philbrookman3126
@philbrookman3126 Жыл бұрын
forsyth hospital where is that exactly ,,,,may god smile on u if possible
@jeffamos9854
@jeffamos9854 Жыл бұрын
@Terre Schill you see god ? Maybe you should stay off the hallucinogens
@johnyharris
@johnyharris Жыл бұрын
@Terre Schill *"You mean God isn't here? Are you sure? Many of the rest of us can see him just fine!!"* Is this the Spinoza's God? If not then what exactly do you mean? Can you see him like you can see these words on your screen?
@youaresomeone3413
@youaresomeone3413 Жыл бұрын
@@visancosmin8991 Are ya? Well let's see you leave your body and travel outside this world and come back. Let's see you do some healing without a single piece of modern technology and medicine. Lol 😆
@jaddaj5881
@jaddaj5881 Жыл бұрын
Realms of reality… I just came for a clear headed discussion on the reality of the material world - evasive enough imho. But arguing about the nature of reality on the basis of assumptions like esp and telekinesis. You lost me on this one.
@JungleJargon
@JungleJargon Жыл бұрын
Half the time it’s not even my thoughts and your thoughts. People tend to listen to lying spirits all day long.
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
hi jungle i don't understand but me like how you speak
@gettaasteroid4650
@gettaasteroid4650 Жыл бұрын
Zeusness? ...Les dieux ont soif!
@friendoengus
@friendoengus Жыл бұрын
let's serve them some beer!
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104 Жыл бұрын
Does Zeus have an essence or is he a collection of properties?
@gettaasteroid4650
@gettaasteroid4650 Жыл бұрын
@@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104 That's a fake question because everything has two handles; the one to carry it and the other not. Furthermore essence is just another word for purpose therefore Zeus can do bad and still be redeemable.
@notanemoprog
@notanemoprog Жыл бұрын
No. No. No.
@baizhanghuaihai2298
@baizhanghuaihai2298 Жыл бұрын
The comments on channels like this are so funny. People with legitimate skepticism are met by people absolutely transparently desperate for some kind of meaning and order to the chaos of the human condition. This absolutely neurotic desperation for meaning and sense-making produces a strong, foul odor.
@1SpudderR
@1SpudderR Жыл бұрын
Hmm? Two magnets....You and He.....! Two magnets ...A and B....! Two Computers ...You And He...! And A and B!? It is Just getting the Tuning Correct Not Right or Left...Correct!?
@btaranto
@btaranto Жыл бұрын
Hahaha 🤣
@haroonaverroes6537
@haroonaverroes6537 Жыл бұрын
there is no collective mind ! humans could contact each other unknowingly, share the same thoughts, values, sympathy, goals, .... etc to look as as if it is so-called collective mind, but not the way they think, there is something deeper than that but not the way they think. 5:00 is funny enough ! mathematics is the product of human logic, human logic is other story but has nothing to do with their .... 5:50 is not true at all, yeah the laws of physics are already there but that does not mean that humans get the laws from their imaginary world ! 6:45 is a real absurdity ! 7:00 through the power ESP ! collective unconsciousness ! what all this absurdity ! Newton, Einstein, .... worked hard and had good logic to figure out some laws of physics not because they plugged into the imaginary world ! 8:50 there are those manipulated and mislead mankind using very advanced technology, that has nothing to do with the absurdity !
@3r2w1c
@3r2w1c Жыл бұрын
You can't have a Doctorate and talk about nonsense like this can you?
@davidthurman3963
@davidthurman3963 Жыл бұрын
Lol reality and this channel? Isn't that an oxymoron? Flat earth.
@andriy123
@andriy123 Жыл бұрын
Wherether one thinks the foundation of reality is Logos, God, Matter ,energy or anything else , you have created nothing but merely changed symbol, Carl Jung
@kos-mos1127
@kos-mos1127 Жыл бұрын
Carl Jung was correct in that we use images and archetypes when talking about reality.
@08wolfeyes
@08wolfeyes Жыл бұрын
This guy seem to believe that ESP is a real thing, which it isn't and yet is being asked to talk about his thoughts on how reality is? I think perhaps he needs to be checked into a mental home before even attempting to think about such things!
@mrbwatson8081
@mrbwatson8081 Жыл бұрын
How do you KNOW especially is not real? Have you studied ESP? Why was you not being interviewed?
@tonyatkinson2210
@tonyatkinson2210 Жыл бұрын
@@mrbwatson8081 I’ll answer for him . To be more precise : ESP has never been demonstrated to be real . Of course we can’t prove is not real , for the sane reason we can’t prove fairies and pink elephants aren’t real
@mrbwatson8081
@mrbwatson8081 Жыл бұрын
@@tonyatkinson2210 have you ever smoked dmt with your friends in a dark room? How do you KNOW esp is false?
@mrbwatson8081
@mrbwatson8081 Жыл бұрын
@@tonyatkinson2210 have you studied every creature in the universe in order to conclude esp is false?
@maxwellsimoes238
@maxwellsimoes238 Жыл бұрын
Big problems are conscieness ignores reality because it is unpredicted. Guys Not show up how figuret out reality though conscieness . He hipotesy about gos model are phich worthless.
@dreyestud123
@dreyestud123 Жыл бұрын
The most pointless conversation ever. Like discussing is Aquaman can beat up Batman.
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104
@jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104 Жыл бұрын
Yes.
@genius1198
@genius1198 Жыл бұрын
this one was a good laugh....not you robert... but in the whole reality I do believe this show should be renamed.... dumbfoundments of misconception
Dean Radin - Does ESP Make Sense?
10:08
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 19 М.
Dean Radin - Does Physical Reality Go Beyond?
10:52
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Was ist im Eis versteckt? 🧊 Coole Winter-Gadgets von Amazon
00:37
SMOL German
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
The child was abused by the clown#Short #Officer Rabbit #angel
00:55
兔子警官
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
My little bro is funny😁  @artur-boy
00:18
Andrey Grechka
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Bede Rundle - Why is There Something Rather Than Nothing?
13:05
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 24 М.
Max Tegmark - What is Ultimate Reality?
12:51
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 45 М.
Paul Davies - Gap Between Non-Life and Life
10:49
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 115 М.
David Albert - Why Is There Anything At All?
10:11
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 50 М.
Subhash Kak - Can Consciousness Be Non-Biological?
11:43
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 46 М.
From Magic to Religion to Science: What's Next? Dean Radin
31:01
Science and Nonduality
Рет қаралды 76 М.
Paul Davies - What are Observers?
11:59
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 116 М.
Dean Radin - Does Consciousness Defeat Materialism?
4:39
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 12 М.
How Could ESP Work? | Episode 1508 | Closer To Truth
26:47
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 69 М.
Was ist im Eis versteckt? 🧊 Coole Winter-Gadgets von Amazon
00:37
SMOL German
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН