Same.

Okay, so happy to hear this. Always thought it looked so much better than the intended effect.

me too. i thought dlss was messing it up and then to find out it wasnt intented lol

same here!

Yup, same.

gpu prices are too damn high ^^

I got my PS5 during the preorder period for 499€ and it’s my favorite purchase in recent memory. The money I’d have to invest to have a pc that can run these games the same way as the PS5 is so so much higher.

True - it's remarkable. Still, the value is offset by the new £70 standard for games, along with the push towards digital and subsequent absence of resell value.

@@cascadesequence7307 But you CAN still buy physical. My approach for Forbidden West was to get it cheap (PS4 version in this case, because the upgrade to PS5 is free), play through it in a reasonably short time, as the hype still lasts ( I still took something like two or three weeks because I don't get to play each and every day) and then resold it for like 10 bucks cheaper on the secondary market. So in essence I paid 10€ to experience a great game for about 100+ hours. I'm currently doing the same with a couple of other games I bought second hand, which I plan to resell for nearly the same price afterwards. This obviously doesn't work for multiplayer games but then again, I'm having trouble thinking of a multiplayer game that came out in the last couple of years that is not free and also not absolute Garbage at launch that I MUST HAVE and spend 70 to 80 bucks on. By the time stuff like, say, Battlefield 2042 is actually worth playing, it'll be dirt cheap or even on EA Play. So although I still like my (aging) PC quite a bit, Gamepass Ultimate for my PC and Series X and PS Plus on my PS5 in addition to my new favourite Strategy for new Sony Exlusive releases means that I'm spending between 20-30€ on gaming per month, which is pretty cheap for playing basically almost anything you like.

The GPUs tested here are last gen GPUs though. 2080 was released in 2018. If it weren't for the pandemic and other factors decimating the market it would hardly be a fair contest comparing the console to actual current hardware (RTX 3000 and RX 6000 series) for the price

Yeah, we desperately need direct storage, my poor 7GB/s drive is just waiting to be unleashed.

Unfortunately still need to wait on GPU decompression.

loading time is already low, but still nice to take ofc, would be more interesting for future games design (ie. bigger maps without narrow corridors) but they must support old slow storage (hope they drop hdd support at some point) so not for tomorrow. Also performance is good but as Alex says, this game is probably not hitting cpu too hard and no RT use so best case scenario for ps5.

@@mrcraggle DirectStorage is still good w/o it.

meh, 10 secounds is more than long enough. Not saying that direct storage is bad, no, its awesome, but if my loading times are less than 15 secounds, honestly, I don't care anymore, its low enough

Weird they don't supply Alex with one. He's their raytracing guy afterall.

yeah, laptop with 3060 runs better than 2080d on geforce now with exact same settings (cyberpunk benchmark).

Same here. I guess when dealing with consoles, its not fair to compare them to current PC builds even when they're fairly new consoles. Consoles will always be behind

@@CLabmusic What's your point? Many PC GPUs are behind many other PC GPUs. Not everyone has RTX3090 or better. 6900XT beats it in rasterisation. Or did last time I checked months ago. Maybe something changed. Though with DLSS,for sure 3090 wipes the floor with it. But 6900XT is so mighty,that there are very few scenarios that it would truly benefit from something like DLSS in terms of performance. Off course , few years from now,6900XT could benefit significantly from DLSS-like tech. Who knows, perhaps Nvidia shall licence the tech to AMD and Intel if it proves superior long term.

@@GameslordXY i was agreeing with the op that it would've been cool to see a 3060 or 6700xt(my card) in the mix or in a future video. I also was saying that I understood what choices they made for this video since a PC with a 3060 or higher would probably not be a fair comparison to a current gen consoles performance

You mean considering the consoles only compare to the previous generation of GPU's and currently can't compete with the majority of the rtx 3000 lineup which is on the verge of already being replaced. The new consoles are great, but only comparing to 2018 hardware in 2022 isn't an achievement

@@TheFreeToaster It is when you consider the price of said hardware.

@@TheFreeToaster Those GPU on their OWN cost MORE than an arm and a leg, you aren't even considering the price of the rest of the hardware.

@@adrianhosein7698 so we're pretending like the chip shortage and scalper situation didn't also just have people spending 3-4 times the price for consoles with the consoles still going for $300+ more than their current value. You can spare the anecdote about how you got one for msrp, the majority of everyone who purchased hardware in the past year vastly overpaid.

@@TheFreeToaster the total price is still less than a PC.

I agree. That moment when you first come out of that ravine death trap and that field is layed out in front of you and the music starts.....

Agreed. Incredibly immersive and far more complex than many would think.

No, it's not. Lol. It's a boring and weird fucking game. Lol. Complete waste of time. Lol. Lol.

It's like Marmite because I thought it was the most boring game I've ever played 🤷 happy others enjoyed it.

@@adriantrusca1245 there are plenty of shooty shooty bang bang games out there for you and the other mouth breathers

That's cool. They've added Dual Sense support on the Directors Cut on pc too apparently.

I know ghost wire Tokyo and this game on PC is finally taking advantage of the dual sense I have after like two years

That's one of the things i really like about the Playstation 5. Next year it's about to get even more immersive as we will be able to physically feel the sensation of being headshotted because of the haptics inside the PS VR2 headset 😄 You might also even experience looking the purpetrator dead on right in the eyes in a online vr mp shooter only seconds before he blows your head off because of the built-in eye-tracking tracking the players pupils. This gen is gonna be something else lol

@@bobdole2184 Yup. I bought the starlight blue controller the other day to check it out on Ghostwire and it's pretty cool. I like how the raindrops and sounds feel on the controller but don't know how much I like the stiffening of the trigger when you use the bow. It feels like it would get in the way if you had to spam the arrows but the sensitivity is adjustable so that's nice. I suck aiming with a controller on first person games but can see it being quite immersive with Death Stranding. Will have to grab the update later and check it out.

I think this is the best application in any game that i've seen to this feature (except astros playroom)

Unless you were/are just upgrading your GPU over getting everything new. In that case,even RTX2060 at its 300$ MSRP (In USA)would be able to beat , if not crush PS5 , due to DLSS. And if you were also upgrading CPU from something ancient to R7 2700X or R5 3600, it would cost you 500$ or less BEFORE prices jumped. In theory weaker than PS5,however in practice more powerful in most situations. For now. And no need for the very expensive Gen 4 NVME SSDs. 2.5" SATA 3 SSDs are MORE than sufficient at this point. So from upgrading perspective consoles aren't necessarily cheaper. It really depends on various factors.

A console is not a PC and can't do what a PC does. Such limitations lead to a relatively low price

@@riccardocattozzo2579 …lol

Its sad that some PC gamers will read this comment as a reason to try to bash the PS5 instead of looking at the fact that the more powerful consoles are, the better multiplatform games can be on PC. One platform doesn't have to be bad so that the other can be good. End of the day people who prefer consoles are going to get a PS5 and people who prefer PC are going to get a PC. No amount of fanboy slander on either side will change these people minds.

@@corey_massey spot on.

Right? Exactly my thoughts as well! I just *love* that DF frequently takes it's time to showcase what the current benchmark actually is and provide *perspective* to everyone. This is super satisfying, because in my opinion, this usually gets lost on reddit or other places where enthusiasts talk about these results. A single bar or graph is never the answer =)

Yeah I am pretty stupid but I found the explanations, graphs, and comparisons really easy to understand. Alex nailed it and these vids are what make DF analysis videos the best.

@Lov Mir lower anisotropic filtering and draw distance. Df is scam though so what are you even doing here😂

Disagree, biggest failure was comparing RDNA2 performance, to RDNA1 (RTX2000 Series) GPUs only, and the 60 FPS cap on PC was a total mistake, this limited vids usefulness. What was shown was fine, but Alex should have also shown current gen on PC, RDNA2 is only in RX 6000 Series, and RTX 3000 Series was also missing for no good reason. The artificial V-Sync cap on PC was useless, having already found scenes that were not hitting that 60 FPS limit on the PS5, there was no point to using V-Sync on PC. Why? The GPUs used didn't hit that V-Sync cap, and when reached with with RTX 2080 Ti, it was an forced cutoff, result was no GPU better than PS5 are even shown. Why?

@@uhurunuru6609 What's your point? KZfaq is limited to 60fps anyways.

mine too on pc

Even on PS4 Pro its easily prettier than most of the entire library, but then again is mostly only drawing map, I totally loved the game though I never finished it just because near the end everything decay away so fast that I was even scared to play more since it would get to the point everything would be broken and I would have to spend so many hours fixing everything specially the online stuff, I wish it wasn't that screwed. Also I was aiming to get max level on all missions and I made most that way, but some are really beyond crazy to achieve such score and the more time I play the more stuff starts to decay and the more impossible it seems out of my reach to do such task 😵 PS: But the thing I really wished was much better would be to have much more human interaction and not being just mostly holograms of persons we sadly most never will see, really wish there was actual lot of human interaction instead ☹

Indeed an underrated gem, misunderstood by a lot of the gaming community, definitely been one of my favorite experiences in recent times

@@guily6669 idk what you mean. You get to go on a walk with your mom and everything

Don’t confuse “pretty graphics” with actually a game being “good”. Probably one of the worst games ever released, focus on graphics and forget what actually makes a game entertaining.

If you can find one!

Which is why I think a so called PS5 Pro or Series X Pro are just pie in the sky for now. Neither can get the components to fulfill current machines, plus probably selling at a loss

Honestly I am shocked. I like my PS5 even more now. For anyone with issues getting one there was a Discord where a guy watches stock drops on the PlayStation official site. I bought one direct from them over a year ago. No issues, no tax, no shipping. MSRP.

$399 you mean

I always knew it, its basically just a bit lower RX6600XT except at the end it probably outperforms it easily 4 high resolutions on well optimized games since the RX6600XT has poor memory bandwidth in comparison to the PS5. The problem is I still don't have a PS5... I surely had quite a few chances at normal prices, but I really want is PS5 digital with nothing else included and they always shove me games, controllers and even crap like 5 year extended warranty that I don't want making the console to go to quite above 500€ for the 399€ console I exactly want. ps: I wish there was Sony direct here in my country cause I won the chance to buy a digital one from Sony Direct but it's from US so I can't buy it, I registered there and only after I read it was only for US, but I actually received a mail after some time but just ignored it...

At $400 the digital version is pretty much best performance per dollar you can get.

If you can get it at that price,yes

@@maxminy5634 I haven't seen a single ps5 that isn't over 600 online and 800 irl.

@@lasarousi I paid 750 dollars for the disc one in 2020 and a PC remotely similar was 1500 or more, obviously you can do much more things with a computer

@@johnf.r6658 I can upgrade my PC for around 500 to outpace the ps5, you know you don't have to build an entire PC to update your gaming experience right? Anyways, the ps5 is the better value for the buck IF you find it under 500 and you are 4k ready. Although all sources also recommend dropping another 150 buckets for a good SSD for the ps5, even DF.

True

And when amd's dlss solution will come

@@schwartzy65 It's not DLSS. It will get closer but it's impossible to match DLSS's quality because it relies on dedicated hardware components. Look at DF's Ghostwire Tokyo PC review, that game debuted TSR which is about the level you can expect of FSR 2.0.

@@schwartzy65 it won't change anything on consoles. Cuz they already have and were using upscaling technics since ps360 generation. They have mastered upscaling technics with pro version of consoles. Even pcs had this feature with resolution scale sliders. Now they are only a marketing gimmick of branding on PC and standardazation on engines.

Honestly,It's just intriguing That PS5 using Ps's Max settings but Not 16X anistrophic filtering Lmoa!!!

Ps5 isn't fully rdna2 and the actual rdna 2 GPUs are too lopsided for a proper analysis.

@@MrInuhanyou123 Dude Ps5 is a custom Rdna2

I still stand by my comment when I played Death Stranding on my rtx 2060 and i7700k at the time with dlss 2k quality mode. It was stunning, and no game comes close to the improvement from dlss. Now I have an rtx 2070 super with i910850k and tested this version, 4k on performance mode, solid 60fps SUPER crisp image. This game sold me on dlss, it was revolutionary then, still is now.

RTX3050 would also be quite interesting in that case.

@@fufu1128 Try God of War 2018 perhaps. I am not claiming DLSS is even better there(I don't know),but it is amazing even so. Foliage especially is improved with it vs Native. Perhaps they improved Native over time.

Yeah. So depending on the game the PS5 or Xbox series x set up will be favored

@@wizzenberry Also workload scales better on PS5 with 36 compute units because it’s a multiple of 4/8 like Cerny said before.

@@mbsfaridi That’s exactly the same case with the Series X having 52 CUs.

The performance gap this gen is much smaller than last. 1800p vs 2160p isnt that noticeable from 7 feet away. Really just comes down to which games you wanna play

Idk about aliasing, but the games runs like ass on my 3060ti at ultra performance dlss, low settings, at 1440p, something's wrong.

Game run smooth as silk and looks beautiful @1440p on my i7-10700, EVGA 3070, 32 gig ram on my SSD ☺️

@@chadmann132 What's your ram, hard drive and cpu?

@@Joreel doesn't help me at all

@@fufu1128 ram is 16gigs of ddr4, my CPU is a Ryzen 5 3600 and I installed the game on a NvMe SSD, Samsung series pro.

And we only have to pay $500 for this baby. Crazy, right?

@Salt Maker I can upgrade a GPU your PS5 is stuck with that mediocre APU.

​@Salt Maker If we talk about cross platform titles, I'm sure that if you can run something on PS5, you will able to run on an RTX 2080 Super, if for you will be enough the "console" quality. And the RTX 2080 Super already far superior in Ray Tracing than the PS5. So in the end, as the rumors says, it will be a PS5 Pro, to reach higher frame rates and better graphics fidelity.

Without dlss sure

@Salt Maker You are a crazy PS5 fanboy if you think 2080 Super will not be running games well 5 - 7 years from now. AND with the mighty DLSS. It all depends on how competent developers are.

@Lov Mir PS4 was around r9 270x (hd7870) not r7 see the r9 270x still hold against ps4 today

i have r9 270x right now in my daughter's pc it play 95% of modern game the same or slightly better than ps4 do you know that ps4 uses low to median graphics settings ? some modern game the ps4 use only low preset and 30fps like Control game sure 2gb is bottleneck for that card games like ps4 poor ported excusive like horizon zero dawn it runs original settings 35 fps but the 2gb vram can lead to some stutters in that game but 95% of games its fine at medium setting 1080p or 900p the rx 460 is the same gpu but with 4gb vram it runs the horizon zero dawn flawlessly

Yeah too bad it didnt fully utilize Nvidia, and favored AMD.. tho there are games that favor more Nvidia over AMD too so cant complain tbh.

The engine isn’t very pretty either though.

@@David-nd4to isn't it decima engine? The same one that Guerilla uses

@@cybervoid8442 Yep

@@cybervoid8442 I think he was talking about MGSV and the Fox Engine.

@@David-nd4to what???

Great, so we can hook up a 1440p 144hz monitor and take advantage of that graphical horsepower right?….

@@mikeuk666 It's so outdated that most pc gamers dont even have a gpu that matches this level of performace (specially for this price). XD

@@robreich6881 No clue what you’re getting at slick. If you want to argue the results, be an idiot towards Digital Foundry, not me.

@@mikeuk666 Still fairly impressive for a $500 box. You cant even get a 2080 for $500 right now, yet alone a Ryzen CPU, 16GB of RAM, 4K Blue Ray player, M.2 SSD, wireless controller with haptics, etc. It’s an impressive little package for what it is.

@@rickrodriguez6244 PS5 is available for $399

Probably would cap at 60 fps, so the benchmarks wouldn't be reliable.

I actually did

@@mikeuk666 A 4 year card that costs more than a PS5. When are you going to stop sleepwalking?

@@juststatedtheobvious9633 I'm not sure why it's a person's life purpose to be a hater. I guess they forget the ps5 will be 2 years old this year as well.

yes we all did DF themselves started this whole thing when they said Gears 5 on series X was running about as well as a 2080 super and i mean the ps5 isnt much different in hardware so it would of been common sense for expect about the same.

@@juststatedtheobvious9633 wake me up when the ps5 can run adobe premier and Pro tools my man

Bit of a late answer, but to my understanding this has to do with the way consoles are built, with shared memory between cpu and gpu, making anisotropic filtering much more expensive. Although I'm not sure.

This option is in NVIDIA control panel settings, so maybe there.

I want to know to. I know you enable triple buffering through nvidia control panel in the graphics settings, but I don't know what he meant by enabling it through WDM Windows desktop manager? 🤔

@@fufu1128 yeah. This explains why sometimes I'm stuck below 60 and gpu not being at 100%.

My ps5 literally runs in 4k lol😭🤣

Depending on the game they are correct.

@@stolenname94 bro are you literally stupid💀 my ps5 legit runs 4k on EVERY GAME. But nice try pc fan boy😂

@@Human_6181 FF16 be like

No doubt

yeah if you think last gen hardware is impressive sure

Sure the Nvidia 4000 series is about to release this year. He is comparing 2 generations old PC hardware lol

my 3080 trashes on ur ps5 heh

@@danisflying it only took thousands of dollars

@@danisflying It better does if your whole set up is probably like 4-5x more expensive 😹

@@danisflying it better do for 4000$ because if the RTX 3080 gets outperfomed by PS5 again like it happened in Nioh 2 i am gonna be laughing again at you PC fanboys

@@danisflying lol it better trash it if your paying 5x the price of the ps5 for it.

Exactly my thoughts. DF should stop using RDNA1 gpus to test against these consoles. Specially when they compare Ray Tracing performance.

It is an FE

@Eric B Because hardly anyone actually overclocks their GPUs/CPUs anymore

@Eric B You can like your own comment as much as you want, hardly anyone fiddles around with voltages/offsets/power limits/clock speeds.

@@01chohan all gpus now also have auto oc, so its very easy xd

i think people have no idea how old the 20 series is lmao we about to be on the 40s and the bottom line on those GPUs will smoke these consoles for cheap.

And "next gen" is nearly 2 years old already. So more like 2 years behind =P

next gen is already 2 years old

If ps5/xbsx slim comes out, it would be 4 or 5. I'm just early 🤣

Funny PC master race but reality is different: rtx3050=gtx1660S rtx3060=rtx2070 rtx3060TI=rtx2080S rtx3070=rtx2080TI conclusion all low- med rtx30 series is equivalent rtx20 series in raw power only rtx3080+++ is next gen Ampere power! So 4 years rtx2080 have all New Nvidia technology and perform close to rtx3060TI

naa 6600XT, 6700XT has to much vram, the ps5 has shared mem, its doubtfull that it can alone 12gb for the game alone to the gpu. Same with pref, 6600XT with OC is prob the more suiting cussin in most comparrisons.

@@AdaaDK i don't think any of the GPUs in this test were beeing memory bound

@@AdaaDK Exactly. 6600 xt have 10.60tflops and core clock 2359Mhz (depends on gpu version) and 32CU/RT Cores (so should perform same performance in Ray Tracing). But note: there's memory bandwidth bottleneck on PS5, because of shared memory. So performance difference might be different, depends on the game.

@@thecarl1013 But 6600 xt also has only half the bandwidth of a ps5 though.

​@@sayakroy9070 Yes, but this is still separated gpu (vram) memory, not shared with cpu. So memory bandwidth bottleneck isn't as big, as on ps5

wait, not disagreeing, but y r u commenting this in this video? This video shows literally no problems with the PC release of death stranding

@@mathdantastav2496 It sounds like you didn’t watch the whole video because there is a problem with the loading times on PC, in my eyes, like others thought PCs were 10 times better than consoles. Just one of the many nitpicks I have about PCs.

@@mathdantastav2496 The game favors AMD by a lot. 10fps difference between AMD and Nvidia equivalent GPUs.

@@ToxMod the loading times are perfectly fine, and they are worse than the ps5 due to the lack of direct storage. Definitly not related to this pc port.

@@pcgameboy8407 booth are still performimg amazingly, a 2080 getting pretty much a locked 60, except for a few rare circunstances at 4k native? come one, thats amazing performance, even if it performs better on amd also, this gamr has dlss, so probly even a 2060 can run this at 4k 60

Games are made.for them specifically then pcs get the scraps. Console hardware this time around is way better out the gate but pcs run laps around them in a year or so. However no company will spend the money to show that difference great example is crisis 1.

Because those 2 are roughly the same in Performance. 5700XT is 2070 Super equivalent.

In a real world scenario yes but thats not the point of the video

Zen 3 CPU like the equivalent of 5800X would be sufficient imo. That CPU is truly mighty compared to what's inside of PS5(which is quite good as I was led to believe). Sufficiently powerful to make PS5 Pro a balanced machine when complemented with 6800XT level GPU. Though honestly, I see very little reason for Pro anytime soon. Maybe in late 2023 or even 2024. No need before that. And EVEN if if was released, it would be held back by PS5 which is held back by PS4 Pro,which is held back by base PS4.

6600xt is barely faster than 5700xt. At high resolution like 4k, 6600xt performs little worse because of poor bandwidth So, no it does not match ps5

Yes it does work.

Yes so far Ghostwire Tokyo and Death Stranding Director's Cut support haptic feedback on the PS5 controller. Just make sure to go to the game's properties on Steam and disable the Steam Controller Input under the controller tab.

@@TerraWare Ghostwire too? Hot damn, i never tried it and used MKB. Thanks!

what about the DS speaker with BB?

What I’ve found to work is plugging my controller into my PC with a usb cable. When i connect with Bluetooth I don’t get haptics or speakers, but with cable I get full haptics and vol out of the speaker.👍

Applause. I was like you originally, but I got the first version for PC. And to make it worse I got Director's Cut on the PlayStation 5 as Sony made it seem like it was going to be a PlayStation 5 exclusive as PC was not being mentioned at all for the first few weeks. I get Director's Cut on PlayStation 5, play for a few days and BAAM Director's Cut for PC gets announced and I don't want to play in 16:9, I would rather play in 21:9 on my PC so now I have the Director's Cut for PC as well.. Lucikly the PC was only a 10 USD upgrade.

Why would they? You already know how much better a 3060 is than a 2060 so do the math yourself

He said he didn't have any other GPUs on hand

It's obvious the 3000 series card would be pretty much flawless if the 2080ti was flawless.

@@theanimerapper6351 3060 is slower than a 2060 super.

They won't be end of life when the new ones come out, they'll still be manufacturing the 3000/6000 cards. But yeah would have been nice seeing more cards, though you could just look at a benchmark for the game testing different cards elsewhere.

lol if you think that release of RTX40 series will "end" the 30 series. I really hope you do realise that VAST majority of PC gamers are still using 10XX series of graphic cards. Not to mention that on release 40XX series is going to be VERY expensive. And finally - DLSS is prolonging the longevity of graphic cards so... No point of replacing 30XX cards for the next two years. (Then MS/Sony will most likely ditch last gen. )

@@Schizm1 You call a product ''end of life'' when they're no longer manufacturing them but maybe i should have used ''end of sale'' instead. Usually they do this a few months in advance to clear out old inventory before the new generation launches that replaces it. I haven't kept track much about gpus since I got a 3080 at launch day a year and a half ago or something so I only just learned they will keep making 30xx series gpus well into the 40xx lifecycle. Kind of unusual but I guess the shortages have something to do with it and it might be smart to have wafer supply from Samsung and TSMC at the same time.

Last Gen gpu-s ? All Nvidia rtx20 series have the same RT and ML functions and in raw power: rtx3050=gtx1660S rtx3060=rtx2070 rtx3060TI=rtx2080S rtx3070=rtx2080TI only rtx3080++ is real next gen power!

Seriously? Have you deleted the past 2yrs from your memory? You may want to have a look at Steam's HW metrics!

Because of the issue he stated with vsync. PS5 forces vsync which impacts performance so to do a meaningful comparison you need to also enable it on PC. Doing so however limits the FPS to 60, so comparing PS5 to any cards that achieve 60 in the selected benchmark areas doesn't really tell you much besides the GPU is better than PS5. 3060 probably runs this game at a locked 60 in these scenes so we can't really know how much better it is running than PS5, therefore its kind of pointless to do.

@@sushimshah2896 So, what? Why should I care about the Steam charts? It's still 3 1/2 years old. The GTX 1060 it's still the most used card on Steam. So, should they only bench with a GTX 1060, because it's the most used card? And AMD is basically irrelevant on Steam, but he still showed some benchmarks with AMD cards. So, your steam charts excuse makes no sense. I would like to see current gen GPUs vs current gen consoles. I would like to see if a RTX 3060 or 3060ti can beat the PS5. Or are you afraid, that the new gen GPUs are faster and better?

@@starmanhov I understand your point, but still. They only show benchmarks (against consoles) with last gen GPUs and I don't understand why? They could at least add one current gen GPU. A RTX 3060 or 3060ti would be a good start.

@@starmanhov the RTX 3060 is just as powerful as an RX 5700XT it aint running any game better than the PS5 you saw what the PS5 did to the RX 5700XT it smashed it even the RTX 3060TI is 2% slower than the PS5 GPU which is equivalent to RX 6700XT in cross gen games and PS5 GPU will get alot more powerful as we enter next gen and more GPU Complier shaders driver updates tools software optimizations are done and we leave crossgen behind games build on next gen engines from the ground up for PS5 will see the PS5 gpu performing like a RX 6800 - RX 6800XT performance

after trying the game myself it does actually have FSR 1.0 one small problem for some reason it looks especially terrible even at ultra quality, as if the devs broke it and its not upscaling correctly but just stretching it with no filtering

Because that way you eliminate any possible CPU bottleneck, the point of test is to benchmark GPU vs GPU at max performance.

@@sachoslks but what about if the ps5 ran into a cpu limitation? This a variable when benchmarking GPU

What about when Ps5 gets super resolution?

@@mikeuk666 You are a pathetic pc fanboy going around each comments and replying. I understand since pc has no quality games to play

For the money yes it absolutely is. But it doesn't compete with new RTX 3000 cards, let alone upcoming RTX 4000 cards.