So true

Absolutely true..

I somehow agree and also disagree. If we looking debate of university scale the facts are true . Whenever if we looking debate on highschool scale yes there are lots of fake facts. Ihope you dont judge based on a certain debates on youtube. Try to go through the uni debates. On advancement debate, try to search on MUN debate cause in MUN once the facts is wrong the speaker will be stop immediately

@@muhdhafiz4110 R.i.p

Muhd Hidayat why?

i agree wholeheartedly

i think you did it, second-handedly

High mountain to jump, at the end of the day? XD

Based on my analysis la en opposition points are far more legit than the SSP cuz they bring up what is IR 4.0 for today generarally walhal SSP pointing out the cause of industrial revolution and when we talking about the cause you have to refer it to history.Based on history yes you can said that superior country exploiting the needy one but As we all know people learn from history and thats why we have to three mirror to look back b4 we moving forwards.The SSP is just defeating their statement by going to the past but we are talking bout the future girls and the fact that that dewan has more girls over boys really bring the opposition teams moral down because everytime SSP's giving a speech the audience always claps for it just watch the vids plus to bring a thing such as " boys have to be more concentrate on what they say and at the end of the day relationship doesn't work" are complete idiotic to conclude the debate it shows how unprofessional you are to use sexes for strengthen your points 😑 This is what happen when the fight is between two gender it is good for generating heat but not for points look at lokman spitting FACTS yo LMAO 🤣 fuxk debate just use bribery nowadays pui and why the hell im typing this at 4am ni f couldn't 😴 therefore I rest my case cioa

yes....grammar doesnt matter much in debate..it's about how you present your ideas and facts confidently and logically.

It does matter because grammar and vocabulary is the basis of eloquence. I have personally watched a lot of debates and those that argues with poor language skills seems very unreliable in relaying their points across.

lmao sadly i have neither

Insulting the other side is not allowed in debating.

@@akhtarfaisal604 they are

@@harrisns2221 that's sexism

@@nicccccccccccccccccc sexism has nothing to do w this

dudeeeee 😂😂😂

So deep.

Someone make this a song omg 🤣👍🏻

You should joint politic . 😂

thank you brother/sister 🥰

Thank u so much i need this

When i know they are actually in a relationship, double awwhhhh 😍😍😍♥️♥️

mrym linda yes dear. Legit real😍

mrym linda hehe i found it from twitter and ig. #iship

Syahira Izyana minit keberapa dia cakap macam tu?😍

+Farah Fieqa apa nama ig and twitter dioranggg

Nazrie Adam So true. But as human, we tend to look at the mistake of others. Kalau kita tunjuk something, index finger pointing towards other, 4 others pointing to our ownselves. Hence, renung2kan, selamat beramal. Hence..

The problem is people critised without a substantive arguement instead make a joke about them. That definitely not normal to make fun about their speech. Debate not about language matter it is a content matter.

Ali Syazwan True. Its all comes back to attitude and mentality. We can only advise them but AT THE END OF THE DAY, its them who act.

yep true

@@Mr.Ali_Ryuji but the medium of a debate is language.... If you're language sucks you won't be able to express your content well

Anuar Aizek lol me too..hahah

Same here lmao

Kikiki Sama weh...

lol same goes to me haha

Same jgk weh

Ikrrr jealous gile😫 boleh je speaking tapi tak setanding lah

lol.....just read up newspapers...... and talk with your friends in English

Usaha tangga kejayaan bro. Kalau malas berusaha macam mana nak fasih english. Mereka fasih english sebab mereka telah melalui cabarannya.

dont say like that . U may hurt their feelings . So you ? Why dont you go up there talking or mumbling.

Shashahh Hermaine many girl is okey 😊

PM opened a very weak case, almost a squirrel to set it in the 1700. Note that the motion says “is” instead of “was”.

Sid Kul K

I concur. SSP girls and more savage HENCE they won. The points elaborated by MCKK is well organised and relevant.

Ko biol ke

Noorlaila Ayub which part?

Noorlaila Ayub so? Is it wrong to repeat the phrase?

Haidatul Atirah minit berapa eh???

Akimuzairy 58.06

Haidatul Atirah hahaha yea2 i know, saw that on twitter 😍😂

at what time ?

Naeilah An-najah hahaha me too

His father was an Umno Youth repsentative...and also medical doc..Dr Nawar.

@@ismailyaacob309 you got his ig?

@@fadhliasyraf9011 who?..his father?

Miss Niss sekolh seri puteri

ana mira tema debat akan diberi awal-awal, mungkin seminggu sebelum debat, tetapi usul akan diberi 30 minit sebelum debat bermula.

Spontan

Perlu ada banyak ilmu dan pengetahuan

first round u ll be given the title of the motion a week earlier or something.. then if u passed the first round , u gotta prepare urself with ur points n wide idea for the next motion..

I'd say both. Texts yg diorang ada pon mostly just isi debat je, cara nak sampaikan tu yg spontan

Musix4life Black4eva savage? I don't think that's what matters here. All we need to hear is a clear and winning points. SSP's points and rebuttals are not strong enough in my opinion. MCKK 2nd debater is very consistent in conveying his speech and points. #NotSexist #ImOnTheWinningSide

Totally agree, SSP's points aren't compelling. But the way they deliver it, it was convincing. That explains why SSP won.

un known mostly scripted

ya true..dia tergesa-gesa sngt

debate kot hahahaha..

Anyway yang match pasal revolusi industri memang padu👍

Laila Rose tiberrr

kan hahaha

Laila Rose tu bagi kat geng2 taknak amek spm n yg mcm tak amek spm

Laila Rose tu bagi kat geng2 taknak amek spm n yg mcm tak amek spm