***** Jews would say the 'Christian god' is a false man-god and they reject Jesus(as) the way you slander Islam they to say same about you. Muslims only care of what God thinks about us not what jews-Christians think. We believe in Jesus(as) and all the Prophets and we fallow the Laws. And there is a day of judgement for a reason. ‘And they say, ‘None shall enter Paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian.’ These are their wishful beliefs. Say, ‘Produce your evidence if what you say is true!’ Nay, whosoever surrenders his whole being unto God, and is a doer of good, shall have his reward from his Lord; on them shall be no fear, neither shall they sorrow.’ (Quran 2: 111-12)

***** Never will the Jews or the Christians be satisfied with thee unless thou follow their way of life. Say: "The Guidance of God,- that is the (only) Guidance." Wert thou to follow their desires after the knowledge which hath reached thee, then wouldst thou find neither Protector nor helper against God. QURAN 2:120 Jews-Christians have rejected God and left the Torah-Gospel and they wish Muslims would do the same. Its why only the Muslims today obey Gods laws. Prayer, fasting, no pork, circumcision, no intox, women cover hair, etc

smashmouth1001 Careful insulting the final messenger mentioned in bible 50 plus times to come including by Name it only hurts you not him. Such insults to Gods messengers only secures place in hell does not hurt him

Many christians are good people but MOrey is a human devil Bring me any of his arguments he constantly lies and inserts fake words. Just give me any of his arguments. He is a satanic liar their are Christians like James white and william craig who are more honest in debating. This evil liar Morey for example replaces the word 'thigh' in a hadith to a perverted word THAT HE KNOWS IS A CLEAR LIE. “Say: ‘Verily, those who invent a lie against God will never be successful’” [Quran 10:69]

Taqiya is Iranian belief sherlock. No where in Quran is it found. Its shia iranian belief who like the Christians claim 'ali' is 'god' while you say Prophet Jesus(as) is 'god' and they left the Quran as you left the Gospel. As for marriages of the past it was social norm in the past their was no 'age 18' marriage even among christians. Marry her self was 12 when she concieved Jesus(as) so are you going to insult your God? And we don't slander any Prophet while christians curse the final messenger much.

He is just a fool. Bro.

Deaf blind will never find the truth

Jewish Talmud is vile against Christians and Muslims. Jews rejected God in the Flesh, out of their own ignorance.

So how can call as pagans when we worship Yahweh the same God like you

Armando Santos Christians also believe Allah has no Children. Christians believe God became a man in the form of Jesus to teach us how to get into heaven. Jesus referred to himself as a son so it would make sense for us. Jesus numerously indicated him and the Father were one - no son.

LiftedX No. Christian believe We are his children. both NT AND OT. and Jesus is son of God before even the creation of earth he had eternal relationship with father. thats why Christians believe his son of God. Jesus is one with the Father because his God. one God Yahweh can be in three persons. i mean look at Mark 14:62 priest ask him are you son of blessed one Jesus replied “I am, said Jesus, “and you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven.” So God does have Children and Jesus is son of God Isaiah 63:16 says our Father that Yahweh is our father. so no what you said is every thing wrong. the Idea Allah has no Children is from Islamic beliefs only

Armando Santos Sounds like you are pushing Jewish mysticism to me. Here is Jesus claiming he was God in the Flesh: "I and the Father are One." "Before Abraham was, I am" "From now on, you do know him and have seen him!" "Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'?" Then Paul: "you must worship Christ as Lord of your life." Yahweh is the Jewish interpretation of God. Jesus is the correct representation of God. God of Jesus: "God is love." (1 John 4:16) Yahweh: "Kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man" (Num. 31:17) God of Jesus: "Whoever welcomes one of these little children in my name welcomes me." (Mark 9:37) Yahweh: "Put to death men and women, children and infants" (1 Sam. 15:2-3) The Jewish God and Allah are very similar. The God of Christians is not. Are you sure you are worshiping the correct God?

Bob Edgar Lol, of course when you "compare and assume the Bible is correct 100%) as obviously you do, then in your opinion, the Qu'ran would "disprove" itself. Unfortunately my fellow internet interneter, this not the method one uses to validate a text or source of information...You have to read the text in question and scrutinize it for its claims and authenticity... The Qur'an is telling us clearly that Isaah (Jesus) was not crusified. Personaly I would be quite shocked that "God" could be killed, or God's Son would be killed in such a manner....It just does not make any sense at all...You do know that there is not a single verse anywhere in the Bible, where you hear Jesus (pbuh) HIMSELF claiming to be God or the Son of God ( authubilla- I seek refuge in God)..on the contrary, I read Jesus fell to the ground in prostration, His head on the floor and "prayed" to..err God? do you want to explain this? and when He is addressed as being Good, he replies by saying no one is good but the Lord..so whats going on here??? The whole thing makes no sense and seriously confuses the reader...the only way around this is to "ignore" these verses.

Bob Edgar Sorry, but there are so many "versions" of the Bible, so many errors, so many contradictions, so many unscientific facts..I wouldnt and couldnt trust it.

You are a funny man.

Victor Constantin Try to read this and see if your Christianity today was not charted through a course of man-made doctrine... TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2006 What Really happened at Nicea? The Players Alexander of Alexandria: Bishop of Alexandria. Said Christ was the 'same substance' as the Father. Convened a council of bishops from Egypt and Libya to anathematize Arius and excommunicate him and his followers. Athanasius: served as a deacon at the Council of Nicaea. He was strongly opposed to Arianism. He helped the Council decide against Arianism, and was later exiled. Constantine: Emperor of Rome. He called the Council of Nicaea to settle the dispute over Arianism. He was the Emperor who recognized Christianity as a legal religion and later tried to make it the state religion. Eusubius, Bishop of Nicomedia and a supporter of Arius, would later baptize Constantine. Contrary to popular Christian myth, Constantine was a pagan and was baptized on his deathbed. He also never really made Christianity a state religion because Christians couldn't even agree on anything. The power grab of the pagan Trinitarians would be completed after his death. From Brittanica.com, "In his theological interpretation of the idea of God, Arius was interested in maintaining a formal understanding of the oneness of God. In defense of the oneness of God, he was obliged to dispute the sameness of essence of the Son and the Holy Spirit with God the Father, as stressed by the theologians of the Neoplatonic influenced Alexandrian school. From the outset, the controversy between both parties took place upon the common basis of the Napoleonic concept of substance, which was foreign to the New Testament itself. It is no wonder that the continuation of the dispute on the basis of the metaphysics of substance likewise led to concepts that have no foundation in the New Testament--such as the question of the sameness of essence (homoousia) or similarity of essence (homoiousia) of the divine persons." It was 325 A.D. at Nicaea that the doctrine of the Trinity was rammed through by Athanasius (using Mafia tactics) in a Council that was overseen by the Emperor Constantine who, ironically enough, thought of himself as God-incarnate. (Constantine was a Sun Worshiper and only made an official conversion to "Christianity" on his deathbed). Roman coins of the period still portrayed the image of the sun God despite the alleged sudden adoption/conversion of Christianity. Many of those present at the Council Of Nicaea were opposed the doctrine of the Trinity, siding with Arius. Even after the Nicene Creed, the Trinity was still hotly debated for decades and centuries after. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CHURCH AFTER NICAEA 325 AD - Constantine convenes the Council of Nicaea in order to develop a statement of faith that can unify the church. The Nicene Creed is written, declaring that "the Father and the Son are of the same substance" (homoousios). Emperor Constantine who was also the high priest of the pagan religion of the Unconquered Sun presided over this council. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica: "Constantine himself presided, actively guiding the discussions and personally proposed the crucial formula expressing the relationship of Christ to God in the creed issued by the council, `of one substance with the Father'." Quoting Bruce L. Shelley, a writer for Christian History, we read: "The Council of Nicea, (was) summoned by Emperor Constantine and held in the imperial palace under his auspices. Constantine viewed the Arian teachings-that Jesus was a created being subordinate to God-as an ‘insignificant’ theological matter. But he wanted peace in the empire he had just united through force. When diplomatic letters failed to solve the dispute, he convened around 220 bishops, who met for two months to hammer out a universally acceptable definition of Jesus Christ. "The expression homo ousion, ‘one substance,’ was probably introduced by Bishop Hosius of Cordova (in today’s Spain). Since he had great influence with Constantine, the imperial weight was thrown to that side of the scales. . . . As it turned out, however, Nicea alone settled little. For the next century the Nicene and the Arian views of Christ battled for supremacy. First Constantine and then his successors stepped in again and again to banish this churchman or exile that one. Control of church offices too often depended on control of the emperor’s favor." The American Academic Encyclopedia states: "Although this was not Constantine's first attempt to reconcile factions in Christianity, it was the first time he had used the imperial office to IMPOSE a settlement." "The Emperor Constantine himself is said frequently to have appeared without his imperial state, and, with neither guards nor officers around him, to have mingled in the debate, and expressed his satisfaction at their unanimity, whenever that rare virtue adorned their counsels. For Constantine, though he could give protection, could not give peace to Christianity. . . . Momentous questions, which, up to that time, had been entirely left to a small intellectual aristocracy, had been calmly debated in the villa of the Roman senator or the grove sacred to philosophy, or discussed by sophists whose frigid dialectics wearied without exciting the mind, had been gradually brought down to the common apprehension. The nature of the Deity; the state of the soul after death; the equality of mankind in the sight of the Deity -- even questions which are beyond the verge of human intellect; the origin of evil; the connexion of the physical and moral world had become general topics; they were, for the first time, the primary truths of a popular religion, and naturally could not withdraw themselves from the alliance with popular passions. . . . The first civil wars which divided Christianity were those of Donatism and the Trinitarian controversy." --History of Christianity, vol. ii., pp. 295, 296. At the end of this council, Constantine sided with Athanasius over Arius and exiled Arius to Illyria. 328 AD - Athanasius becomes bishop of Alexandria. 328 AD - Constantine recalls Arius from Illyria. 335 AD - Constantine now sides with Arius and exiles Athanasius to Trier. 337 AD - A new emperor, Contantius, orders the return of Athanasius to Alexandria. 339 AD - Athanasius flees Alexandria in anticipation of being expelled. 341 AD - Two councils are held in Antioch this year. During this council, the First, Second, and Third Arian Confessions are written, thereby beginning the attempt to produce a formal doctrine of faith to oppose the Nicene Creed. 343 AD - At the Council of Sardica, Eastern Bishops demand the removal of Athanasius. 346 AD - Athanasius is restored to Alexandria. 351 AD - A second anti - Nicene council is held in Sirmium. 353 AD - A council is held at Aries during Autumn that is directed against Athanasius. 355 AD - A council is held in Milan. Athanasius is again condemned. 356 AD - Athanasius is deposed on February 8th, beginning his third exile. 357 AD - Third Council of Sirmium is convened. Both homoousios and homoiousios are avoided as unbiblical, and it is agreed that the Father is greater than His subordinate Son. 359 AD - The Synod of Seleucia is held which affirms that Christ is "like the Father," It does not however, specify how the Son is like the Father. 361 AD - A council is held in Antioch to affirm Arius' positions. 380 AD - Emperor Theodosius the Great declares Christianity the official state religion of the empire. 381 AD - The First Council of Constantinople is held to review the controversy since Nicaea. Emperor Theodosius the Great establishes the creed of Nicaea as the standard for his realm. The Nicene Creed is re-evaluated and accepted with the addition of clauses on the Holy Spirit and other matters. If Nicaea just formalized the prevalent teaching of the church, then why all the conflicts? If it were the established teaching of the church, then you would expect people to either accept it, or not be Christians. It was not the established teaching, and when some faction of the church tried to make it official, the result was major conflict. It was a theological power grab by a faction of the church. A major complication throughout all this was that the emperors were involved and directed the outcome. At Nicaea it was Constantine that decided the outcome. Then we have the flip-flopping of opinion with the result that Athanasius is exiled and recalled depending on who is in power. In 357 AD the declaration that homoousios and homoiousios are unbiblical, and that the Father is greater than His subordinate Son. This is 180 degrees from Nicaea. In 380 AD Emperor Thedosius declares Christianity the state religion. One can come to the conclusion that whichever way Theodosius favors, that is the way in which it is going to end. This is exactly what happened next. In 381 AD the struggle was finally ended by the current emperor, Theodosius the Great, who favored the Nicene position. Just like at Nicaea, the EMPEROR again decided it. The emperors were dictating the theology of the church. Gibbon observes, in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, chap. xxvii., that: "Theodosius declared his resolution of expelling, from all churches in his dominions, the bishops and their clergy who should obstinately refuse to believe, or at least to profess, the doctrine of the Council of Nice. His lieutenant Sapor was armed with the ample powers of a general law, a special commission, and a military force. . . . In the space of fifteen years, Theodosius promulgated at least fifteen severe edicts against the heretics; more especially against those who rejected the doctrine of the Trinity; and to deprive them of every hope of escape, he sternly enacted that, if any laws or rescripts should be alleged in their favour, the judges should consider them as the illegal productions of either fraud or forgery."

Victor Constantin I cited you above the expose' on how the doctrine of trinity developed in early years of Christianity which I'm sure you don't totally agree if you are a Jehova's witness... However, sad it may seem, yet you must ask yourself, where did you derive your bible translation from? If you are Jehova's witness, I'm sure you know of the concept of paradise, witnessing, and unbelief in crucifixion... Do you know why your doctrine is so different than most Christian denominations? Because your founder got his idea from ISLAM but unable to follow the rules of ISLAM, so Christianity offers the most convenient exit for him... I guess, there are many things you need to unwind for yourself because the thread your trying to pull never hurt me at any point, instead it will choke you if you continue to pull the thread down...Salam!

Victor Constantin you don‘t even understand what quran means...Did you say it‘s a book? Book in arabic is kitab, quran means "the recitation". So, you must be thinking things void of truth and sense that's why, no matter how hard we draw the line to connect, nowhere could we find ourselves in tangent. So continue in what you believe in, as I do with mine. In the end, this is not a race against each others, but rather against our own selves. Salam!

Charles D al quran written in al qitab, are they the same? the speaker and the words spoken, are they the same? But i won‘t wonder because you.guys love confusion... Just like in the book of John, "in the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God..." What if we replace God with another common name like, "in the beginning was a mooooo, and the moooo was with cow, and the mooo was cow". Get all logicians in the world and let them judge with all sanity. The problem with you people is that, take back if you have the original because it is sane to translate it uf you like in this manner, "in the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God's". Now does that makes sense people?

SpeedyRemake how credible is your bible to be the criterion for judging whether the quran was wrong in telling that it's the wife of Pharaoh, not the daughter? And you said, it's written history. Which history book other than your Bible can you read that? Otherwise, I can conclude you're one of the liars out there.... Second, I'm not so certain with Haman as far as history is concerned. But your conclusion is doubtful for me. But I gave you the benefit of the doubt, GIVE ME YOUR REFERENCE, which could support your claim that Haman was never in Egypt. Because the absence of details doesn't necessarily mean the proof for its non-existence.... I want you to back up your claim with credible historical record, with unbiased motive....

Fukuyu Okelah In all things Fukuya, see the good and praise it....or be a perpetual hater, your choice, my choice. May the GAOTU (Grand Architect Of The Universe) continue to watch over you and nurture you! respectfully, Observer Jules

Fukuyu Okelah Salaam Alaikum

Jules Rensch wa' alaikum salaam...