neutral milo

😂. You must be joking. There's so much wrong with the fake moon landings. No stars. Who was filming the ascent of the lander leaving. Whom filmed it landing.😂. Bro with these questions alone your done. & To top it off the supposed official photo of The Earth Rise from the supposed moon shows a CGI box around the earth. & NOT one photo of the globe matches another. In terms of color & continent sizes. 😂. You can't be that slow. I'll say it, Your disingenuous.😂

Yeah.

No he didn't.

@@saadzamir9327yeah he did

That’s crazy💀

Fr😂

Average IQ of 71...

I mean it would be pretty cool but that's sadly not how it works :(

Yeah bro he thinks that he can see mars from millions of kilometres away

Well, you can see it very clearly with the naked eye… It just looks like a star so unless you have a telescope, you probably won’t even notice that it’s Jupiter or Saturn.

Underrated af

WHO ADDED FUCKING WIND! WE ARE TRYING TO BEAT THE DAMN COMMIES, NOT GET BERATED ON TIKTOK!

@@superk9letsplays419 it wasn’t the wind. It was just the momentum of twisting the flag into the pole. The flag also had a pole going through the top of the flag holding it up.

@@archierush868 IK.

I was around then ...it was real ...trust me! Stop being gullible....

That's the moons moon

@@coolhawk2003no the moon is the earths moon

Yall should know that is impossible to go to the moon don't care what yall say

@@miguelcastillo2025 nobody cares about your comment either

Funny how the Earth is roughly 4 times the size of the moon but in the pictures looks like seeing the moon from Earth huh?Earth should look gigantic from the lunar surface

😂

I'm stealing this

@@popcornpizza8869 you can’t steal it if space is a vacuum, it’s stuck at the surface of the moon and can’t be moved cus of the suction 🤦‍♂️

@@zaynbo.9512 ✈️

BEST COMMENT......EVER!!!😅😂😂

Of course

It is all fake

@@edfarmer154There he is! Your kind will make great entertainment in the near and foreseeable future.

Oh yes their just to the south

Oh yes venus is just 80 - 250mil km, mars is approx 400mil km, so yeah pretty close

​@@TheChasedangernot to be a 🤓 but you would be able to see the other planets much clearer than you would be here no there not gonna be 5x the size from a naked eye but you would be able to see them much easier

​@@TheChasedangerhmm... May i ask a question?.. no reason just curious.... D'you know what sarcasm is?...

@@TheChasedanger chill. It's a joke

If the moon landing is real, how did they get past the Van Halen radiation belt

​@@steelfistgaming4046first of all, not van halen thats a guitarist its called van allens belt. Nasa tried to find a course to go through as little of the van allen belt as possible and avoid the thicker parts while still going as fast as possible. After this they kalkulated that at most if the astronauts wherent in the spaceship they would endure a dose way less than lethal. When the apollo astronauts came back to earth they had endured around the same amount of radiation you would endure with 2 brain scanns, which is not a verry dangerous amount. The rest was blocked by the spacecraft as they had good radiation sheilding. DO SOME REASERCH BEFORE YOU TALK. YOU ABSOLUTE BUFFON

​@@steelfistgaming4046they built the rockets out of certain materials

@@Alexanderpavlov18 Those materials are too heavy

​@@steelfistgaming4046so?

You are deluded, never been to the moon 😂

​dawg you've never been to the bottom of the ocean how you know it's real how do you know everywhere else in the world is real i mean like possibly it COULD be that maybe you aren't the main character but like that's not possible right??

fuck i meant to reply to the dude on top of me

@@joedaman8436The evidence would suggest otherwise.

@@joedaman8436have you?

U can actually see planets from earth sky if there was no pollution

​@@RavenGaming...you can see them even now, if you can recognize constellations you can recognize planets. You could even google where & when to look for them if you're not. All of the inner planets, plus jupiter and saturn can be seen by the naked eye. They reflect light just like the moon, yet you can't make out any details because it's just a tiny lil speck of light.

​@@RavenGaming...In daylight though?

@@consumerofbepsi5254 yea ive seen a planet before in daylight

@@zombie_bruh1 Were you looking down?

and he acted as if that related to the wind

I don't know if it was the original guy or this guy, but you can see that there's a correction at the top of the screen when he says that. 17%.

@@rainbowfrog1239 pretty sure astrokobi corrected it

@@rainbowfrog1239 yeah

I bet you didn’t know that it was 17%

Just because you gave an answer doesn't mean its compelling, and its hard for people to believe on it cuz the us government is known for many many fabrications

Yeah bro, also that LM looks fake, they must've ridden a cow inflatable to it.

Area 51 nevada desert lol

It's still fake

​@@DannyPanoROTFFLMAOUISMP! 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

@@DannyPanothat’s why it was filmed on the moon

😂. You must be joking. There's so much wrong with the fake moon landings. No stars. Who was filming the ascent of the lander leaving. Whom filmed it landing.😂. Bro with these questions alone your done. & To top it off the supposed official photo of The Earth Rise from the supposed moon shows a CGI box around the earth. & NOT one photo of the globe matches another. In terms of color & continent sizes. 😂. You can't be that slow. I'll say it, Your disingenuous.😂

No cuss words at all

How is this a roast 🤨 He literally just debunked the conspiracies

Uhh in a way ig?

He didn't roast it would have roast if he called him stupid nigga

Fr bro

Wait you can sort by newest?

I regretted doing it

Wakey wakey 🐑

​@@kornflake93Fellas, is it sheep behavior to believe something backed up by science?

1. If the stars weren't perfect, amateur astronomers would spot the fakery. 2. The fakery need not be perfect in order to fool people. Most believe in the landings despite the contrarian evidence.

They hired Stanly Kubrick, notorious for his obsessive attention to detail, to film as accurate a fake moon landing as possible... ... he *insisted* that they film the fake moon landing "on location" for maximum accuracy, and just _could not_ be convinced to back down.

professional film making at the time was amatuer at best compared to today. No connectivity or internet to spurt development. = Mistakes possible. I love that people see what they believe without ever understanding who creates their beliefs, how and what causes their emotions - but they'll fight to the death to prove their reality being real :D

@@Victordecross Nevertheless, they've been faking images since the dawn of phography. You're forgetting that images can be faked without manipulating the film. You can take a photo of a sufficiently detailed set or model and the image would show no sign of tampering.

U acting like professional film makers haven't left Starbucks cups in midevil themed shows. Or planes flying in movies in the 20s. Stop it. Film makers make mistakes all the damn time

He’ll be seeing those stars and planets in just a second 💀

@@Emmaem111 he'll get the 4k resolution 💀

@@Emmaem111then he’ll go further into the light💀

''Tell me, simple man..... Can you see Jupiter from earth? Right now? 'Cause if you can't..... THEN WHY WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO SEE IT FROM THE MOON?!''

​@@Skyhigh_905uhhhh......'cuz you're closer; duh!!

People have replicated this by putting wires in a flag to keep it upright, and then putting it in a vacuum chamber to see what happens. Surprise surprise, any slightest bit of movement makes the flag appear to wave in the wind that isn’t present.

Russia is not sure. So instead of denying it without good evidence, which will be retaliate with something like oh you jealous little child, they play along.

And who would of believed them if they had said something?

Proof? Link? Book? didn't think so

@@mariaaranui6099 history.nasa.gov/AAchronologies/1969.pdf p. 233 do your own homework next time dork

Soviet Union crashed by the moon landing.

I am a person who loves facts. And it seems he avoided the facts. Like 1" The Russians were first to outer space. 2. The moon mission was aborted. 3 The radiation from the moon how did the USA defeat this? This is why people since that time have called USA a lie. And, now this might blow your mind, there is actually a Disney cartoon that speaks of this. It's the German duck, and it was 1952. Which that is crazy that after WW2 they were using German scientists as voiceovers. But, then you do believe whatever your government tells you, like a good docile slave. I tell you what prove me wrong about the radiation and why Russia did not go to the moon and why no one has so called been back to the moon since.

YOu can see some on Earth tho

@@ejmtv3 you can but not as noticeably as moon or sun(obv), you really think they're gonna be big ass planets in sky during daytime on earth? you can tho but they're basically like dots so pretty small to notice

@@ejmtv3no you really can’t. Not unless you have the tools to. and those magnify by 100x more than our eyes can see. they’re so far away. they’re not as close as y’all think they are 🤦‍♀️

@@Jay-rl3bw they're brighter than every star

fr

And imagine thinking the USSR would have totally just accepted that their competitors won instead of looking into it and trying to find any evidence it was faked

The whole conspiracy is so stupid anyways. Remember, if it was faked, the Soviets would have been the first ones to report on it. They were spying on the whole mission from beginning to end, and since it was basically a "loss" for them, if tgey found out it was faked, they would've happily shared the proof.

AAYA FMA I NEDD DVV

EREER@@ryancarriere9766

Still ain’t real though 😞

@@QuotesQS Yeah, you're right, the theories aren't real, they're made up :)

@@QuotesQS Conspiracy theorist detected.

@@mm-qq7bb very funny

@@QuotesQS People are laughing at you here, not me.

😂😂😂

To be fair they are all in a single line in the night sky due to being in a single plane in 3D. But it's really rare to see multiple planets in the same hemisphere or very close to each other.

​@@GMPranavThat's one plane, not one line

😂😂😂😂

@@GMPranavtrue, but most of the time they really arent

lunar surface gravity is 1/6th that of earth.

Youd fly as soon as you jp

Matt H FE - his memes video from about 7 months ago. Level Earth observer. Flat Earth and coffee. A plane truth. Too many more to list. Why do they lie about the shape of Earth now? It was illegal in the UK to teach the heliocentric model in schools until around the first world War. So why? Because knowledge is power. Liars take believers power and can use it against them. Getting people to distrust their rarely tricked five senses and common sense and to believe lies instead means they can get such people to believe anything. Space travel is yet another banksters business model to launder public tax dollars. Kerr ching kerr ching kerr ching

​@@AgarwaenoMg I dIDn't KneW it 🤓

Not to mention gravity has nothing to do with wind.

I like how you think you know anything about physics

​@@laughattack1204And you think you know more than hundreds of thousands of scientists who spent YEARS to make this achievement possible

Im not feelin it

i thought i was the only one to notice that

Agreed

It got worse with every sentence he uttered

So teacher's humiliate you when they teach you?

​@@MutuAdrian335but he's clearly an idiot. he didn't listen to his teachers growing up that's for sure.

ill leave this at 666 likes

@@MutuAdrian335in maths for example you don’t actively say that an equation is fake, you usually don’t even know about it. This dude in the video should be very humiliated.

Breeeeehhhhh

As a Canadian I completely agree

the gravity is also weaker than the gravity of earth's so the flag wasnt just dropping down instantly

There was also a initial motor to flap the fly to make sure it keeps swaying

​@@zenin7219it also had a metal pole going horizontally across it if I remember correctly

A metal pole doesn’t support a piece of fabric that is floppy and it still moves when the astronauts arent moving and Neil Armstrong never swore on the Bible that he landed on the moon which makes sense because he is very religious so that means he didn’t and it’s fake 😂

@@Twizzy_Fr_ if i was him i also wouldnt swear on it, people take religion too lightly and bring it up to just qbout anything

They were the most advanced cameras they had at the time that could fit in the LM

Exactly- but explain to me how is it then that we haven’t ever been back? 😅

​@@the_alchemy_method because it's pointless and a waste of money unless we try to make a base.

@@Christophercurts12345 thats as good an excuse as any I suppose. They can take a rocket to the moon in 69 but cant 50 years later 💭

​@@the_alchemy_methodwait and see, it will happen!

FR💀

IKR

and my bro showed a satern picture from the moon like what da heell

I mean you can. Just not that detailed.

“Haha guys, the fool thinks you’d be able to see planets as even specs from the moon’s surface!!! 😂😂😂” “Hey guys I just saw the ISS & Mars with my naked eye.” - 🤡 You’d be able to see…SOMETHING…not black nothingness. UNLESS…you were FAKING IT with 1960s technology. Even today you don’t really want to fake stars as they have supplied ample alleged solar system “science” that any skeptic would weigh against the supplied “footage” and debunk the whole lot. Whereas when you’re on a brightly lit dusty grey surface with an inky black backdrop - different story. Imagine considering yourselves scientifically minded but laughing & ridiculing someone weighing observations against hypotheses. Absolute clown mentality. Science: the systematic STUDY of the world through OBSERVABLE REPEATABLE TESTABLE EVIDENCES against MULTIPLE hypotheses. You have ZERO personal science for your moon magnet ball theory so don’t ridicule a skeptical brother.

yeah they couldnt perfect the shots so they filmed on location

Copy

@@popcornpizza8869 yeah no shit is just a reoccurring joke people use over time, i dont think we even knwo the original

Reminds me of Internet Historians space intro where he says, “I knew it was fake!” while standing in front of a green screen on the moon.

This guy wasn’t an idiot though he had some understandable points and misconceptions. Also, the guy debunking this wasn’t rude in any way just informative

*how to answer someone's questions

An*

How to spot a 9 year old :

*an idiot

💀💀💀

And somehow that means no wind 😂

what people get wrong is that faking the moon landing would of been 10x more expensive than actually going to the moon. A fake moon landing would of literally broke the bank if it was even attempted

No he said 1% gravi y

​@@Mr0901yeah its the lack of an atmosphere that also causes the lack of wind

They ask questions as if those questions actually hold so evidential value. The majority seem to have predetermined the answers and seem incapable of assimilating any new or factual information that does not fit into their pre-existing narrative.

Your answers are definitive lies, that's the issue

@@laughattack1204 Feel free to continue to believe that while you contribute nothing to the world and especially nothing to human knowledge. You nutters always pride yourselves on your inability to be convinced of anything you don't actively want to believe.

Words aren't violence :p

Damn..... Eminem Damn!!!

Bet this will be the main lyrics of a hit rap in 2075

He doesn’t know what he is talking about

@@huntermidcap4819 what?

Only because of Lunar eclipses. It doesn't actually spin, it just goes behind the Earth which obviously makes it dark :)

Why wouldn't it? It rotates on its own axis. One side faces the sun and the other doesn't

@@Captain_Yatano, the moon spins. It just matches its revolutions around earth exactly, so only one side faces earth (called a tidal lock). A lunar day lasts around 27-28 days, with two weeks of daytime and 2 weeks of nighttime at any given point on the surface

It doesn't. 😂 it's tidally locked. But you could technically argue that the luna cycle is a day night cycle, but it really isn't, not in the way we would really count a day.

@@Now_Time_For_Science why wouldn’t it be a day night cycle? Tidally locked doesn’t mean it doesn’t rotate. It’s day/night cycle is around 28 days, as that’s how long it takes for the moon to complete one full rotation on its axis

2001: A Space Odyssey was released in 1968

@@E.after.D.I.am.T.H and it had no cgi and spesial effects that does not hold water compar3d to reality

Photos have been faked since long before CGI was even thought of.

@@E.after.D.I.am.T.Hu must really hate the end of magic shows

Matt H FE - his memes video from about 7 months ago. Level Earth observer. Flat Earth and coffee. A plane truth. Too many more to list. Why do they lie about the shape of Earth now? It was illegal in the UK to teach the heliocentric model in schools until around the first world War. So why lie? Because knowledge is power. Liars take believers power and can use it against them. Getting people to distrust their rarely tricked five senses and common sense and to believe lies instead means they can get such people to believe anything. Space travel is yet another banksters business model to launder public tax dollars. Kerr ching kerr ching

Idk, some 5 feet away

if i can’t see neptune from my backyard, surely the moon is close enough to suddenly see every celestial body in the foreseeable universe because it’s in space too right

Probably very close to His Uranus

​@@leonardocastellanos7344They look like small dots, though.

​@@leonardocastellanos7344u joking?😊

Even OJ is offended.... lol

But he WON !!!

OJ's son did it.

But o j did not get a conviction😅😂

@@nhoj924lll he did for the civil suit

69th like lets gooo

You need gravity to hold atmosphere to have a wind currents😅

@@prithvidpopeinz2037 I know that the lack of gravity results in a lack of atmosphere, but that’s neither what he knew nor what he meant. Even if you knew that you wouldn’t say it that way. First of all gravity is not a percentage and if he meant 1% of earth’s gravity, that’s wrong. Secondly unless you’re speaking to an astrophysicist you wouldn’t skip explaining or mentioning the correlation between gravity and atmosphere when you mention gravity but your point is really just about the atmosphere. Nah I bet this dude can’t even tell the difference between the two

@@Adamo855 idc about him but the 90likes he got lol ! 😅

@@prithvidpopeinz2037 i was talking about the dude in the video. I’m the one whose comment got 90 likes

This guy is a matrix agent rhe moon landing was fake je was sent by thr natrix to use subliminal messging to convoncr us that the moon landing was real when is was fake doomsay is ciming skon

Matt H FE - his memes video from about 7 months ago. Level Earth observer. Flat Earth and coffee. A plane truth. Too many more to list. Why do they lie about the shape of Earth now? It was illegal in the UK to teach the heliocentric model in schools until around the first world War. So why? Because knowledge is power. Liars take believers power and can use it against them. Getting people to distrust their rarely tricked five senses and common sense and to believe lies instead means they can get such people to believe anything. Space travel is yet another banksters business model to launder public tax dollars. Kerr ching.

Religious beliefs for example…

I see no fact, only opinion

@@pho.phonic are you calling religious people stupid? if so i agree

The flag is also not made of regular cloth, it's made of copper and other metallic foils

This doesn't negate what he said. He explained why it is swinging.

@Brayn126 ok, just adding on, chill bruh

@@tpg1774he wasnt replying to u

Yeah they should have ironed it haha

There are wires in the flag to give it the waving look. But yeah the motion just comes from them moving it around.

​@@AstroKobi😅😅

There is actually a iron pole on the top of the flag We can see It as the flag was straight

You all are the ones that scare me most... you really need to pull your heads outta each other's brown eye and really look at any footage you can find look at the fake tinfoil arts and crafts space equipment 😂 look at the bubbles you can see look at the lighting and the shadows bc it's a movie set not on the moon look at the way the one guy walks in there last video segment here on your post do you really think that's how you'd walk if you were there bc they have evidence of all of this they are fast forwarding the video doesn't it sorta look like it's being sped up???? Really think about this I'm not trying to embarrass you you've done that yourself,. I'm just trying to help you see the truth!♥️ And then look at operation paperclip look at what it says on Werner von Brauns grave? Look up the amateur rocket with a camera attached to it on KZfaq to see what would really happen to a rocket shot straight then go and watch any other rocket launch and you will see they don't ever fly straight up they always fly at an angle and crash into the sea do some digging on all the past astronauts some they say died are actually alive some were killed for finding out the lies oh and nasa in Hebrew means to deceive 😂 ❤now go tell the rest of your ball worshiping buddies what you learned 🙋🏼‍♂️

You have no idea what i think about.

@@gives_bad_advice since you said it I feel like I do

@@PickleJam300_Jbq Ah, the magic of words... been transferring thoughts from one brain to another for at least the past 70 thousand years.

It is

@@huntermidcap4819 Yeah, keep telling yourself that bud🤣

@@huntermidcap4819 That conspiracy is just as dumb as think the earth is flat🤣

​​@@huntermidcap4819you just proved their point, well done

@@alecdawson7277here is a question. If they can land on the moon then why dont they do it again?? They labd on it once and never ever do it again so it seem kinda weird tbh

Not to mention it’s a camera from 1969

​@@lucaspatrick8while its focused on the astronauts, not the stars

The surface of the moon is pretty dark though almost a 0.8 albedo, but yeah still there is no way to capture the stars without making the astronauts look like bright white spots. At this point the consperacy theories would say these are aliens or something.

​@@simonbeaudoin8884I'm confused, stars are so bright you can see from the earth, now you are literally closer to space, do you want to tell me a black and white camera it wouldn't capture those super bright stars even as part of the background

@@daily-chargethe sun buddy, the sun literally just outshines everything we can see

The guy WHY IS THERE NO BLUE ATMOSPHERE

If the camera is pointed at the sun you will go blind💀 plus theres no atmosphere. Its not like on earth where you see blue bright sky, in fact, if you go to other planets that has atmosphere it would be different.

Broooo your so on point 😂😂😂😂

And why did they need to use boot covers ?

I think the earth is covering the sun

he already did

@@nightmarefury9308 wait really?

@@soundofsilencegg yup

​@@soundofsilenceggYesh go check it out

Bro guys flat earth sucks, donut earth way better.

Please outline using scientific and engineer principles what exactly was wrong with any of the Apollo spacecraft that would have prevented them carrying out their functions? Take care.

They used the rest of the 3rd stage to fly all the way to moon by accelerating to 25,000mph and then coasting there. The earth kept on pulling the spacecraft so they were actually slowing down during the coast phase which took 3 days to get there. Also, the moon has no atmosphere, lower gravity and a smaller size so launching things from the surface to get to orbit is much easier there than on earth

You can't just look at rocket and decide it didn't have enough fuel. You need to do the math. And you need to understand a few principles, one of which is the fact that they coasted to the moon once they were up to speed. The distance doesn't much matter if you're coasting and not burning fuel along the way.

@@gives_bad_advice Correct. Unfortunately Newton's laws of Motion and basic Physics seem to be a mystery to the vast majority of these deniers.

An object in motion, stays in motion

Daytime on the moon? No sorry you need an atmosphere for that one 🤠🖕

Please tell me that's satire, ​@@jeremy4375

@@jeremy4375ya kinda don’t the sun is still hitting the moon but not with an atmosphere

@@jeremy4375and according to your logic mars and mercury don’t have a day time

There also was a filter, thats why some stuff kept disappearing randomly

“and where are all the planets??” ☠️☠️i still can’t get over that

And let's not forget that it is the refraction of light in earth's atmosphere that keeps us from seeing the stars during the day. You are correct in your statement. Anyone who points a camera in the general direction of the sun won't see any stars. However, any picture that is pointed away from the sus should be completely full of them.

​@@gary7708You're forgetting that they didn't go up there with 8 Megapixel iPhone cameras that can auto-adjust to different light levels; their equipment was primitive by comparison to what we use now. What they took was designed to capture the bright light reflecting off of their suits and the lunar surface, not the dim light from stars. They would have needed a completely different camera to do that.

Exactly. What most non-believers and flat-earthers do is they will keep lying to themselves and others so they can stay comfortable with their own nonsense beliefs and not face the "harsh" reality that we are in fact living on a giant globe and have been to space many times.

Brainwashed people believe they're objective and rational. They speak to you as if the things they say are the laws of physics. They have an answer for everything and can't say 'I don't know. ' They try to use 'facts' and 'data' to support their pre-established beliefs as signs of their objectivity. This is a Google search of what brainwashing is. It fits flat earthers perfectly!

Exactly

...and think!

skepticism is questioning everything, not assuming it's definitely false

Yeah, if they didn't have that the flag would look even more wavy and would've sagged.

ikr 😭 but when u think twice that theyre grown men and not lil characters then not rlly lol

​@@vxnilla_mintu saying men cant be cute?

@@Countertistic no

​@@vxnilla_mintWhy not ? Mine is.

Ikr they're so cute

Nahh he is just racist because the guy is black

Bruh he's just answering the curious man

If the worlds biggest exporter of long range explosive devices and Movies, says " look I went the moon on my biggest n best long range explosive device, you can see it here in my Movie." You say ..."yes sir, you did"

@@idolhand6468what? The moon landing was real. The US and Russia were in a battle to get to the moon first. And after the US won Russia confirmed it completely and since then has never denied it. They were the US’s biggest enemies and they still say that it 100% happened. Why would they do that moron? Also the astronauts planted reflectors on the moon so if you shoot it at the right angle in the right space and laser will bounce back. This is only possible because people actually went to the moon moron

@@idolhand6468cringe

Was in a vacuum...

@@jackietreehorn5561how does a vacuum affect a pole holding something up?

Mercury is closest plane to Mars too(mostly).. ChatGPT's reply on which planet is closest to Mercury : Mercury is closest to Venus and Earth in our solar system. While it forms a close trio with these inner planets, it is not as close to Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Each group of planets orbits at different distances from the Sun.

How?

@@Art_Explorer_Fun Because Mercury orbit is egg shaped form, so in rare case when Venus and Mars are in opposite of Earth, Mercury is closer to Earth

Same with Mars and Venus... And Jupiter... And Saturn... AND EVERY OTHER PLANET

Mercury is the closest planet to all other planets on average

I always see planets when it's a clear moonless night I've even seen Jupiter's moons through my telescope

@@1cool well that’s with a telescope too. and this guy clearly wanted to see like clear, big planets in the sky which wouldn’t be possible lol

@@santa_clauseoh lol yeah that would be impossible and they would probably kill us if they got too close

He forgot this was 1969, cameras were still using film which has a very limited dynamic range, especially compared to our eyes. There's no atmosphere, so there's no air to cause light scattering, making the surface of the moon incredibly bright. When the camera is metered properly to the bright moon surface, stars are just too dark to appear.

@@josephpbrown i didn’t even think about that you’re righr

Yes, exactly.

If the USs biggest enemy admits defeat, why would some random Tiktokers think they matter more to be lied to than the Soviets

That's what I always say.

Or, they also knew it was impossible with 1969 tech because of the radiation field surrounding earth at 1000 miles above the surface, and went along with the lie to save money because, you know, 1969 Russia was enslaving its own citizens just to exist financially.

They've recently said, the US lied about the moon landing

I mean for the past 2000 years there have generally been good scientists in some part of the world, and since now we got the cross continent communicationand transport and stuff the knowledge accumulated and people built rockets

Because there's more intellectuals than morons

@@smallw1991people been building rockets since the 1900’s with Goddard 1 etc and communication lines were layed in like 1920 or 1930

@@CASA-dy4vs Exactly

The only way to make them believe is to use the hat of discipline and turn them into a tortilla, so that they realize that the only flat thing in the whole argument was them

@@Random64 lol nice

😂🤣

there are definitely idiots, they didn't do it for them though. they die out fast.

Well.. Why havent we gone back, after close to 70 years?

​@@jokermlbbyt4517because it's very risky one slight move your lost in space

@@jokermlbbyt4517coz there’s no reason 😂 WTF get a brain

Believing a theory that can be debunked by simply watching a boat disappear or appear from beyond the horizon vs believing that the US who were in a space race lied about being the first to the moon are 2 completely different things. Nice try though, trying to equate the two so as to discredit legitimately valid concerns with ample evidence. Or do you honestly believe that the same organisation who allegedly sent men to the moon in a landing craft lined with aluminium foil with computers that had less computational power than a graphical calculator are now unable to send them beyond low earth orbit because they "destroyed the technology" and are unable to replicate it. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Gimme a break.

You're wrong

Money

Have you thought of a reason to go back? They went multiple times, collected all the rocks they will ever need, even drove around in a car and played golf. Why go back? Serious question.

How exactly does what happens or does not happen today affect the past?

What reason to go back. Like in the past the US had to compete with the Soviets. Now the Soviets lost, there’s no need to speed up the process of lunar colonization.

You don't think going back is a worthwhile pursuit, but riding Elon's dick for Mars is. Makes sense 🖕

Yeah. I can guarantee if it were fake the Soviets would have figured it out and said so. There was a fierce competition to go there, and they lost fair and square. If there is any cheating they would have mentioned that.

If the Soviets thought the moon landing was fake they would’ve for sure pointed it out and that would’ve been a huge propaganda victory for the Soviets. Who knows maybe they would’ve followed it up by actually going to the moon again like they did in our timeline with the N-1 rocket. Just that that rocket exploded on the launchpad and failed to take off

​@@kyle--859or u know, they would hold america hostage

@@xxtoxii9615 I doubt it. I'm sure them ruining the U.S. reputation would be worth more than anything we could give them.

Cheap af tech though barelt would survive a fake mission let alone the real one they probablt are thankful that thing even worked

this guy also knows nothing about what he's talking about. he only knows what the government says they did. we have never been to space. he should debunk how they livestreamed it without wifi

Yeah! "I love it too"...

are you talking about kobi or the guy thats speaking facts

​@astralakos2085 the one that's spouting nonsense. Thought it was pretty obvious.

​@@manza19cmbro you can see the earth that is not a source of light but just a reflection but you can't see the source of lights which are the stars

Exactly

Especially harder to convince the international community, including the USSR.

I haven't looked, but I've heard that the MARS landing scene still exists in Iceland and that you can see it from Google Earth

Also theres no way NASA put all this time and effort into faking the moon landing and just "forget to put the stars in" or "forget theres no wind" That makes no sense 😂

🤣😆🤣😹😆🤭🤣😹😆😹🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓