Why are the flat Earthers willing to accept zero G in a plane, but then deny that gravity exists?

The reason I prefer your videos to any other debunking videos, is that you don't just call the deniers idiots. You actually address their (mostly ridiculous) claims, and then provide a logical explanation.

That dog is such a brilliant ventriloquist. You can almost believe it's "Dave" speaking.

I dont necessarily think it's fake but I find the fact that her hair doesn't flow around freely in the same manner that her necklace does... kind of odd

Once again proving that Flat Earthers only pick those parts where they think they have an explanation for it, everything else gets thrown into the bin

A healthy level of scepticism is a good thing. Problem being that flerfers and space deniers aren't sceptical, they're either wilfully ignorant or outright liars. . . or both.

Speaking from personal perspective, I can say that the source of such skepticism comes largely from a lack of education. Nearly a decade ago I was big on conspiracy theories. As I got older I decided to pursue educational pursuit in maths, sciences, engineering, and technology. The greater my pool of knowledge becomes, the smaller that pocket of conspiratorial thinking becomes. Sadly, it's easier for these people to hand wave these things away in denial than it is for them to seek valid sources of trustworthy information.

I think most people arguing “it’s not real” just never observe the entire footage outside of their little bubbles.

Imagine actually being a flat earther tho.. how much time must you have to think that the earth is flat

And now, watch the goalposts magically shift 20 feet to the right.

This debunking is absolute bunk.

Seriously, Hollywood needs to start using NASA green screens. They’re so good it looks like they’re not even being used. Seamless effects! 🤔

And yet again, hunting down the original FULL scene, as opposed to only the cherry picked parts the deniers use, DESTROYS their claims. Who'd 'a think it?! Oh right, everyone thunk it.

Unfortunately, Dave, there is no "once and for all." So long as these people draw breath, they'll claim it's fake.

Her hair behaves as a rigid object attached to her head. It's like a mohawk, not like real loose hair.

After Sandra takes out the hairtie she runs her fingers through her hair with ease. The amount of hairspray needed to keep the hair in that position on earth would not let you run your fingers through your hair like that. Ignorance, pure ignorance.

Fun fact. While watching gravity from 2013 with Sandra Bullock, my mom actually caught a mistake. While on the ISS, Bullocks character, Ryan Stone doesn’t have her hair moving freely, or up like in real footage of female astronauts in space. Something i didn’t notice until she brought it up. Little mistakes like that would come up a lot if NASA is faking space missions, but we don’t. So i think on that regard, Its pretty safe to assume that NASA is actually doing what they say they are doing

I feel like a lot of people who make excuses for it being fake don't actually think them through, they just kick the can down the road. I honestly don't know what people get out of saying these things are fake

I've been a hair stylist over 20 years and you absolutely can make hair stand up like that very easily & be able to put your fingers through it you dont have to put so much hairspray that its crunchy at all you use a matt finish past & you you use the hair dryer about 1ft or so and blow the finishing hairspray at same time it will do that effect no problem no need to be "drowned in hairspray" the straight strands on the sides are definitely not free flowing &the way she put her fingers multiple times in it trying to separate it w/ minimal separation absolutely shows there's product in it 100% SIR YOUR DEBUNK HAS BEEN DEBUNKED!

It’s funny to me that space deniers don’t believe that it’s possible to be in space, but acknowledge zero g’s in a plane is possible. The ironic part about being in orbit around the earth, is that that’s exactly what the plane trick is. The only difference is that the zero g’s in a plane has a time limit. All an orbit is, is an object constantly falling towards the earth, but because it’s traveling sideways at such a high speed, it’s always missing the earth. So of course you experience zero g’s in orbit. It’s the plane trick on a more permanent scale. You’re always falling so you always experience this weightlessness.

Respectfully; Anybody who thinks the world is flat really needs to get some professional help.

You can't prove a flat earther wrong. They'll simply move the goal postvand act as if they never made the disproven claims

i love your dog dude, as soon as you start your outro, he realizes, gets excited it and raises his paws, cute afff

I love how you stay respectful at all times while debunking this. This is exactly the style of debunking we need, so people who are in doubt stay with you and don't be pushed away by feeling ridiculed. Thank you so much

Flat earthers decided they were right While roundearthers proved we are correct

It'll never be enough to overcome the power of "nuh uh". But the point isn't to convince those who can't be convinced. It's to show just how weak their claims are to those who might otherwise fall for them. And you've done a fantastic job of that. Clear and thorough, as usual. Another excellent video from Rusty and his sidekick.

Imagine if they spent all this effort on reading scientific literature, they might know and understand things.

At this point I’m 80% sure flat earthers and flat earth debunkers are working together so they can endlessly make these kind of videos. And we watch them all (on one side at least).

After watching your first video I was really surprised anyone saw this clip and thought, yep it's fake. Now having seen more of the original video it's clear they didn't think that because nobody could possibly arrive at that conclusion and that clip was selected in bad faith. Again, these science deniers have no honor or class

It's always funny watching people trying to claim every single one of thsee clips are fake. On the one hand they go in to such detail that they've got jewelry on its own harness and a ridiculous amount of editing time in post with huge teams of people, then on the other hand they have to miss and leave in "obvious" signs of fakery. Standard flerf thing I guess, picking and choosing to try and have things both ways.

They're obviously using blood magic to get those effects, come on Dave use your brain (this is satire)

This reminds me of "It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it’s damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person." Bill Murray I mean go outside at night and on certain days you can SEE the ISS. Even if you could put them on some ship and send them to space they would just claim they were "drugged" or somehow otherwise tricked. They use lack of evidence...as evidence...because it's a conspiracy lol.

FE: They must have faked it with a plane that can go fast and free fall longer. GE: Yes.

People are sometimes critically stupid

I love how conspiracy theorists always share clips at the lowest quality possible in order to mask any details that might, ya know, totally blow up their theories. Watched two of your videos so far. Both were great. Definitely subscribed. Partly because of the content but mostly because of your dog 😉

how much they pay you?

It was a green screen that was filmed in a water tank in a zerogee plane, obviously.

Flerf: _Cherry picks video he thinks has a gotcha and demands explanation._ Glerf: _Addresses flerf's points, soundly debunking them._ Flerf: YoU cHeRy PicKeD tHat VideO! WaTcH tHe WhOLe tHinG!

"Her hair looks fake!!" But lets ignore her floating necklace😂

I thought earth is for real flat, but after watching your videos i can sleep well tonight knowing earth is not flat.

I personally believe that if a flat earther got invited to go into space and to the Station to see for them selves that the earth is a globe, they would come back and still claim it was fake.

If I may weigh in: all those special effects deniers are invoking require so many re-takes, and so much post-production work to make it even remotely believable. Those conferences were held live, with questions from the audience. There is NO image technology that allows any of that. Not even close.

The wires dont get tangled with the mic cable because he switches the mic from one hand to another mid roll

Liars liars pants on wires.

The effort it takes to create/manipulate this kind of footage is almost more difficult than actually going to space

Holy! You utterly destroyed any and all notions this video is faked and not in orbit around the earth. One of the best most thorough savage beat downs I’ve ever witnessed!!

Alright sweet now doing one on the people appearing out of nowhere

One of the greatest pieces of evidence is you can go out and see the ISS. Ive seen it fly over a dozen times. It really puts onto perspective how awesome humanity really is. We can do this shit, how awesome! I don't get why people try to disprove space travel. Do people not like the idea that we can do great things, that we can challenge nature and do things that are far beyond the wildest dreams of our ancestors?

Having worked with green screen editing and animation, I can say that it is extremely difficult to get the shadows falling on a green screen to line up with a background image. Especially like the irregular parts that jut out in the background behind the astronauts. One would have to construct a 3D model that matches the background structure to enable the green screen shadows to conform on it. It certainly could not be done in real time for a live stream.

The fact this stuff needs to be explained to people makes me weep for common sense.

The view from that window is frightening!! But beautiful at the same time

I work with a Chroma screen every day as part of my job. A green screen would be blatantly obvious.

If only flerfers put this much mental energy into productive things.

5:30 his arm and leg would also collide with the "wire" that was "grabbed". So either the wire somehow passed through his arm and leg, or the wire became disconnected during the roll and instantly reconnected (somehow) in time to be grabbed.

I like how you just un-picked their cherries by pulling out the entire broadcast

If I am ever graced with the opportunity to visit and inhabit the ISS, I would like to see if I could take with me the LEGO Ideas ISS set to assemble on a live stream. Then I could ask Flerfers how would that footage be fake when there are 864 LEGO pieces floating about in whatever trajectory they were moving upon opening the bags that contained them. Of course the real entertainment value would be in seeing me chase after these pieces in a Zero G environment.

I have definite proof that your videos are shot under water. Your "dog" is obviously a seal in disguise 😜

It’s totally obvious and clear that the microphone cord is connected to a harness to give the appearance it’s in outer space, and each individual one of her hairs is connected to a harness to give the appearance they’re in outer space, in fact this comment currently is connected to a harness to give the appearance it’s in outer space 😳

Does no one remember the fact you can fly a plane in a sky and create zero gravity by flying in a specific pattern? You don't have to be in space to float.... Great video btw, you've convinced me he was grabbing his pocket.

Ask any hairdresser. Lots of hair spray (or gel) can make your hair stick up, but rigidly, like punk mohawks. Not *flow* upwards like that. There's at least one video showing a lady astronaut washing her hair in space, wet hair sticking up. Why that video is never mentioned by flatearthers? 😏

Sadly, with flatards and reality deniers, there's no such thing as 'once and for all' As the old saying goes, 'You can't teach stupid" 🙄

It's actually genuinely incredible that the people that claim it's green screens, or wires, or what-have-you clearly have no idea how any of those things work and seem to be ignorant to even how things behave here on earth in regards to gravity, drag and even just being in water.

Does anybody know were to find the full video of this interview???

Occam‘s razor: exists Flerfs: I pretend I didn’t see that

Calm , Rational well reasoned - debunking done pretty well perfectly

Ah yes when im in a cgi green screen my jewelry and hair are being manipulated by zero g gravity

Sandra's necklace is about the most obvious thing in shot which indicates that this is happening in zero G. It's also a, fairly common, piece of jewelry which would be hugely expensive to fake using CGI.

OMG!!! You could actually bring some these people on the ISS and they still wouldn't believe it.

people who claim they are in harnesses have never spent time in a harness, not only would what you say in the video be true but spending that much time in a harness without taking weight off of it can lead to toxic shock

For any believer: The truth is, the Bible does not comment on the shape of Planet Earth. It does not say that the earth is flat, and it does not say that it is spherical. Let’s take a closer look at some of the commonly cited passages that supposedly depict a flat earth: Revelation 7:1 says, “I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding back the four winds of the earth.” In writing this, the apostle John was using idiomatic language-the “four corners of the earth” refer to “every distant location.” We use the same idiom today; for example, when we speak of Olympic athletes coming from the four corners of the earth to compete in the games, we mean they are coming from all over the world. The book of Revelation is full of non-literal descriptions and symbolic language. To press Revelation 7:1 into a hyper-literal interpretation makes no sense. John simply says that, at one point during the tribulation, God will cause all wind to stop blowing. The “four corners” encompass the cardinal directions-north, south, east, and west. All wind will cease at God’s command. Psalm 75:3 quotes God saying, “When the earth and all its people quake, it is I who hold its pillars firm.” Other passages also refer to the earth’s “pillars,” such as 1 Samuel 2:8, but in no case should the language be taken literally. The book of Psalms and Hannah’s song in 1 Samuel 2 are poetry. The writers liken the founding of the earth to the constructing of a house, and their descriptions are comparative (i.e., metaphorical), not literal. The point is not that the earth is flat but that the earth belongs to God; it is His construction, and He guarantees its stability. God’s “pillars” will not move, and His “roof” will not cave in. Even when the moral order of the world seems to have crumbled and people are overcome with fear, God will not fully withdraw His sustaining power. What about the Bible’s references to the “ends of the earth” in Deuteronomy 13:7; Job 28:24; Psalm 48:10; Proverbs 30:4; and other passages? Does a reference to the “ends” of the earth teach that the earth has an edge and is therefore flat? We’ll take Deuteronomy 13:7 as representative of all the passages: here, Moses warns the people of “the gods of the peoples who are around you, whether near you or far off from you, from the one end of the earth to the other” (ESV). A couple things can be said about the phrase the ends of the earth to show that it does not refer to a flat earth. First, that phrase, like the four corners of the earth, is idiomatic. We don’t expect people to take us literally when we speak of going “back to the drawing board”; neither should we force a literal interpretation on “the ends of the earth.” When biblical writers speak of the “ends of the earth” (28 times in the KJV), they are simply referring to “the farthest reaches of the inhabited world.” Second, the phrase the ends of the earth at times refers to people, not to land. For example, Psalm 67:7 says, “May God bless us still, so that all the ends of the earth will fear him.” In this verse, the ends of the earth references the people who inhabit remote and distant places (see also Psalm 98:3 and Isaiah 45:22). Obviously, in this context the phrase is metaphorical and cannot be used to depict the earth as having a physical edge. The same phrase, used elsewhere, should also be considered figurative. The Bible does not teach that the earth is flat. The references to the “earth” in the Bible are often not references to planetary earth but to a portion of dry land bound by water. For example, Genesis 1:10 says, “God called the dry land Earth, and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas” (ESV). “Earth” is mentioned as distinct from “Seas” and cannot refer to Earth as a planet; the same Hebrew word for “Earth” is used in Deuteronomy 13:7 and the other passages listed above. While the Bible does not teach that the earth is flat, neither does the Bible explicitly teach that the earth is spherical. Some passages do allow for a spherical earth, such as Job 26:7 and Isaiah 40:22. In any event, the Bible is far from affirming a naïve or unscientific understanding of the earth and the solar system. There is simply no basis for the charge that the Bible teaches a flat earth. Passages that seem to present a flat earth can all be explained when correctly understood.

Debunking the BS is always a good thing. There is always a great potential to keep someone on the brink from falling for the foolishness. There is seldom a chance to reach a true believer who can simply cry 'fake!' at any evidence presented. Never underestimate the power of stupid.

Necklace. NECKLACE! A FREAKING NECKLACE just floating around, but YEEEEEAH harness and hair blah-blah-blah. Are people just selectively blind or something?

I don't understand the need to cherry pick a few frames and fill the blanks with complete nonsense when the full uncut 20 minute video is available to anyone. 🤷‍♀

Problems on these "debunkings" is that there are too many what to debunk overall. The hair is the biggest problem, those don't float on these footages, those are pointing straight up, like involving with the gravity. Like, when you are in the water, those are floating AROUND, those are on your face, back, side, every where. Those are not pointing up all the time. There are air in the "space station" and air conditioning. Yet, those hairs are stuck upwards.

NASA: *experiences one slight glitch in a video feed spanning 254 miles in to space aboard a space station moving at nearly 18,000mph... 36 year old man with a net worth of $17,000, driving a 2000 Cavalier, living in a studio apartment in a dump: "Hah! Clearly they are faking it!"

The key with Flat Earth folks is that they have FAITH. Thus they can explain away any facts and logic you present.

"They faked it by (insert insanely complicated set of explanations that require a stupid amount of effort just to perpetrate a hoax that has no plausible reason to bother perpetrating)."

I've git a theory , admiral bird mentioned land beyond the ice wall...what if NASA are pretending that land is Mars and are filming there?...they always put things in plain sight🤔

You'd think a multi billion dollar company spanning the globe would have enough money/authority to order a re-take of the shot where everyone's obviously messing with the wires. Also, spinning around and wires don't go well together. 8:34 Try doing that with wires. 10:33 Obviously "Highrish" doesn't know how a green screen works. It's not for making things overlapping the actors look like something it's not, it's to make the background look like something it's not.

Also, the fact that Christopher drifts to the left is another reason why he's obviously not on cables.

I can't believe that this still has to be explained to adults.

I had a feeling that this tired clip was cherry picked, but man, I've seen less cherries picked for a pie eating contest. Thanks for finding the extended clip that flerfers dare not talk about.

Why does no-one ever talk about L and P waves to prove the earth is a globe

IT WOULD LITERALLY BE HARDER TO FAKE THIS, THAN TO DO IT FOR REAL.

I love all the "it has to be fake because [thing that would be impossible on Earth]" claims 😂

I can’t see why people think it’s fake, I just love watching you debunk videos, it’s actually hilarious

This video is a great example of Occam's Razor, something I'm sure Flat Earthers understand, but wrongfully apply all the time.

Dave, nobody never mentions the obvious effect of gravity on faces, or lack thereof in ISS shots. All faces in zero G look puffed up because the gravity is not pulling it down or any other direction and their faces are unchanged whichever way they are positioned. Is this a bit too much of a mental arithmetics for the flerfs?

Actually they could have shot this on a zero g plane, just that that plane *free fall* would have to last *90 minutes* continuously and seamless

Tha fact alone that flatters think they’re just fooling around day in and day out to make these videos just to make them fake is moronic. What ‘on earth’ should they do that for???

Thank you so much for your videos. I have been a flat earther for nearly 10 years, and your videos have helped me to break free of the paranoia and anger that accompany conspiratorial thinking. Again, thank you.

your videos are great, easy to understand explanations, great examples and editing, and very informative

How long before Slappys sock puppets turn up and start blathering about triangles instead?

Dear Rusty’s human, I want to keep Rusty. Yours truly, not Rusty’s human

Because nothing actually exists unless it suits some stupid flat earth theory.

Unfortunately the flerfs that watch this video will just "nuh uh" it all away. They cannot accept reality so they must create a vivid fantasy of a flat earth.

I watch your "flat earth" video with the same humor of knowing I should not drive by a road way accident, and slow down to view the carnage. You do a great job of countering all of the conspiracy theories of "...it was on a sound stage, with green screen...". Well done Dave.

Look at how natural hair without gravity looks on the 0 gravity plane, now look at hers and other Space Station videos with long hair in them.... It doesn't look natural. A kid would be able to tell, especially when someone prints it out

Imagine a whole conspiracy theory was born just because of 144p resolution

i think i have figured it out, its wireless harnesses connected by bluetooth