Doomguy: Uses cheat codes Demons: Understandable have a nice day Demons: Uses cheat codes Doomguy: Wait, that's illegal

This is 1 bug I always encounter: in the MS-DOS Doom1 E1M6 in the maze-like part, there's a zombieman who somehow appears outside te walls, forever haunting nobody. If that happens, you can't reach 100% kills without idspispopd.

Doomguy: Wait, this is Doom 2, so why is BFG Division playi-

Demon: *use idclip* Doomguy: "You dare use my own spell against me, demon!"

and It's all fun and games till the demons decide to use iddqd

Keep in mind this only happens in Doom ports that: 1) Share similar memory addresses; 2) Don't fix ray cast rounding errors; 3) Don't fix the intercepts array overflowing. PrBoom+ for example can only emulate the all-ghosts effect behaviour, but it doesn't actually directly overwrite memory through the intercepts array.

omg it's the funny madness man

Doom madness animation? 👀

Video was released 4 minutes ago, this comment is 20 hours ago, mmmkay

hmmm i see lol

As soon as I heard him call it the "all ghosts bug" I thought the same joke. :D

Good!

Same with Prboom+.

OMG NO FUCKING WAY THAT THEY DID THAT'S SO COOL

Feels like a Golden Souls enemy

Is it rule 34 immune?

@@raulsalcedo8332 dont give them ideas

@@raulsalcedo8332 The only thing that is given an exception to Rule 34 is if its a citation of Rule 34 also called Rule 35. Otherwise no because it is something that is concieved making it exist so it is under Rule 34. (Unfortunately...)

The block map bug is pain

I hate that it exists in Eternity and cannot be turned off in the compatibility options. Forgive me skillsaw, but I ain't completing Heartland until that happens.

@ASDF I too use GZDoom to avoid the Blockmap Bug and I'm not even ashamed to admit it.

I haven't seen this since playing Doom on a 0486 years ago.* *On regular vanilla maps.

why do i have this weird deja vu feeling?

Very cool this video inspired a new speed run tactic

9:20 so how does Zero Master do it reliably enough to use? OK I see his explanation in the description of his video. Basically his brute force method was using inputs that he could replicate without TAS. Still I wonder how precise do the inputs have to be? His video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hpZhl5By0temqYk.html

​@@YogiTheBearMan Karl Jobst has covered Zero Master's technique here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/isVljbx7p821qYE.html He explains that Zero Master's simulations performed about 300 years of gameplay to find the solution. Great video.

@@Drahcir_XIII still doesn't explain how he went from discovering a random string of inputs that happened to activate the glitch to implementing it in an rta run, like did he figure out a way to do it consistently and if so how

@@aclonymousthe video does explain it. The 300 years of game simulated was used to run a simple string of inputs constantly to try and find the values for the bug to happen. Basically the simulation did the inputs than ran into a wall, if it ran into the wall, it would reset. it kept on doing that until it went through the wall the inputs given were simple. Would have been something like, move forward 20 map units, shoot 3 times, turn to the right, shoot again and then go into the wall. Because they were simple enough inputs that a person could do it, ZeroMaster just replicated the inputs

It really reminds me of Super Mario 64 in that way, and Decino reminds me of PannenKoek2012.

I never made that connection before. ​@@ImDemonAlchemist

Well i mean doom's ray tracing only takes into account anything on the x or y axis since those are the only two axes you can aim and shoot on that have anything to intercept your bullets with so it's kind of obvious why pools and damaging floors can still hurt doomguy,

Still obscure as hell. Everything in this video is.

Oh you want to know what i see Hehe cocademons squeeze line

0:16 seems much more frightening, due to the fact that nothing is stopping them, and there's eerie music playing.

@@lugbzurg8987 Playing Another World of Beasts/Esper World was a good choice.

Knee Deep In The Code

@@mjc0961 The Shores of Code In-Code Thy Code Consumed Sign(Sigil) And finally: *Tech Gone Bad*

@@mjc0961 Yep, there we go. That's brilliant. ♥

Codemonium

The ancient code

The series is still getting new releases, and I think they even put at least one of the old ones in Eternal; there's the Unity port for everyone on console as well, and it's dirt-cheap (5 bucks for each game, and it goes on sale sometimes), and it's shaped up to be a very respectable source port (as opposed to the disaster it launched as) and even include a bunch of prominent WADs as well. Doom is arguably more accessible now than it's been since its heyday, even the most tech-illiterate person can just buy it, download and play.

@@hoodedman6579 Yep! When I heard doom eternal was coming out, I bought doom 2016, and after that decided to play through doom 1 and 2 before it released. I had _heard_ of doom before, but had never sat down and played it. I'm now a big doom fan even working on a custom 7 map wad, and after that's done I'm going to give final doom a go.

@@kingkuma4112 Nice! That's quite the dedicated fan you've become! Is there a place I can follow your progress on your wad, perhaps? Maybe reply to this comment chain when it's done?

@@E5rael Yeah, I can do it.

Lol, it does actually look like it IS Mr. Bones' Wild Ride, superimposed on a revenant.

Clearly the map didn't like being badmouthed and got revenge.

Well that and it was a community map that was never meant to be bought so having TNT Evilution's quality go south in the middle towards the end of the megawad would have been fine if it was released for free like it was planned to. Honestly i would have been fine with just the plutonia experiment as final doom.

@@michealpersicko9531 For the most part, I enjoyed TNT Evilution. Most of the levels are creative and interesting, and pushed the engine in various directions. Also, it's not like the original doom2.wad was the greatest thing either. No one had yet truely mastered the art of Doom map making, the tools at the time were poor, and computers couldn't handle anything beyond simple map geometry with only a handful of enemies onscreen at a time. Now, I personally dislike Plutonia. It seems to love putting hitscan enemies and archviles in places that are very awkward to aim into or hidden, so that you take a bunch of unavoidable damage if you don't have the proper approaches memorized, and has too many combat arenas where movement is downright awkward. Also, the architecture is, with a few exceptions, rather bland and repetative. Where in TNT you never know what sights you'll see around the next corner, with Plutonia it will surely be more brown walls with green vines and chaingunners. I've played through all of TNT twice. With Plutonia, I started two or three times, but never got past the second or third level before getting bored and annoyed and dropping it.

@@michealpersicko9531 Plutonia and Evilution are a perfect pair -- for people like me who hate Plutonia's high-difficulty, short-length maps and prefer to actually spend time exploring without running like a blue-assed fly from revenant missiles. Either one alone would leave a chunk of players disappointed.

....I guess you just got a deci-boo

@@johndexterzarate6663 he posted on a community team that he was out of town and busy on a new video some time before this video

Sans: Hold my beer

But what if Doom had a Ghost enemy, does that mean the Ghost turns into a Ghost?

@@CheddarCheeseRebirthed yeah, *This is Big Brain time*

@@reffo5548 GHOST GHOST

We're reaching levels of 2spoopy4me that shouldn't even be possible!

This leads to the very mysterious question: "Who asked?" Well, to understand the question, we have to understand the answer: So this very particular question is asking about who asked, the question is divided into two parts: Who & asked "Who" is what is called an "Interrogative word" which specifies the answer to make it suitable for the question, the "Who" here is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy which has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. Second: "asked" is a verb in the second condition of the forms of the verb, which are divided into three types: Regular, Past, or Past participle. and the verb "asked" is in the "Past" condition, which talks about the time that is gone and no longer exists. The original form of this particular verb is "ask", which is to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, to summon what the answer wants from the previous two points, it's that: The answer wants to understand and know about the person/human/homo sapiens/guy who wanted to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, in order to answer this question, we will have to identify two points: First: What was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked? Well, to understand this question, we will NOT have to understand what is the answer. We will just have to understand the definition of "Question" The "Question" is A sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information. Questions could be identified using the "Interrogative Words", which we talked about earlier. these "Interrogative Words" are nine, which are: Who, What, Where, Why, Which, When, Whose, Whom, and How. We are going to explain each individually: As we said earlier: "Who" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. "What" is specifying a non-person/non-human/non-homo sapiens/non-guy who either does not have a brain that he can understand and think properly with, like plants, or objects, or they have a brain, either that their brains cannot understand and think properly, like animals, or their brain can understand and think properly, but their species/type is rather different from the society, like extraterrestrial creatures, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A(n) animal, plant, extraterrestrial creature, or object. "Where" is specifying a place, city, country, continent, etc. where something happens, or some(one/person/human/homo sapiens/guy), plant, animal, extraterrestrial creature or object which exists in a place, city, country, continent, etc. "Why" is specifying a reason for doing something. "Which" is specifying a choice of either two or more choices that the receiver of the question usually chooses. "When" is specifying a time in which either something already happened, or something will happen in either near, or far future, for example: "When will anyone save me as I was captured by MatPat for trying to comment a joke about his video?" "Whose" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, and that person/human/homo sapiens/guy owns something, or someone ( if he is a human trafficker ), and the sender of the question is trying to find who owns that something, or someone. "Whom" is an old-fashioned term, not often used today. Many native English speakers are less than clear about its accurate use. In fact, the word serves the same purpose as "Who" questions, which as we said: specifies a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human, but tends to be used when it is the object of the verb. With modern English, there is no real need to use the term. "How" could be referring to the way something is done or refers to the status of the receiver of the question. Now, let's get back to where we were talking: Questions can be different, and many, and the possibility of guessing the question could be high or low according to the frequency of using it, but guessing a question which was asked for the first time is very difficult, so, it is not specific what was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked. Second: What is the purpose of the question "Who asked?"? Well, it could be referring to roasting someone as the humor of "No one asked.", and it could be referring to actually asking a question about who asked the question. So, here's the answer to the question "Who asked?": It could be anyone who made something unlikely for the others or someone who asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else. (s)He could be you. (s)He could be me. (s)He could be Elon Musk. (s)He could be even your mom. as long as they have made something unlikely for the others or they have asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else.

Nothing to do with partial invisibility tho.

i think when it was named, specters didn't exist in doom so i don't think it was an idea to come up with

@@YourTypicalWarp so it was named before the game came out

@@YourTypicalWarp No idea why this comment has any likes, that's so untrue. Spectres have always existed in Doom. No idea where you got the idea that this insanely rare bug that likely wasn't discovered until some time after Doom II or even Final Doom released -- would be named as a "ghost" bug because spectres didn't exist... It's because you literally act like a ghost. You can go through walls and are barely able to have any interactions at all. Spectres can interact with the environment... and attack.. and be hit. So what way is this remotely similar to how Spectres function....? The weird bullshit some of you guys say is insane.

​whoa, look, i was just misunderstood, i thought he was talking about the spirits from doom eternal :\ now, instead of starting an insanely dumb argument, i misunderstood the enemy and i apologize!

@@theraymunator Sourceports may emulate the all ghosts effect in some way or another. Vanilla compatible sourceports will behave very similarly to original game in such event, where intercept array starts overwriting unrelated memory. All it takes is for the hitscan shot to go through a lot of targets.

So you can't do the all ghosts effect on the Unity port on Doom II's MAP30. (4:10)

If i did it... It would be even scarier than normal doom 2 revenants

Funnily enough, before there was research done into why this bug happens, it was known to deathmatch players as something along the lines of "the DM noclip bug", because if there's no monsters around it just looks like everyone turned on noclip at the same time.

Ducino

@@LonelySpaceDetective But even that is kind of a misnomer, because noclip doesn't prevent you from flipping switches and it doesn't stop your projectiles from colliding too.

Did they also chase you out of bounds when you tried to use noclip or freeze?

s p o k i

#freecivvie

Me too.

This leads to the very mysterious question: "Who asked?" Well, to understand the question, we have to understand the answer: So this very particular question is asking about who asked, the question is divided into two parts: Who & asked "Who" is what is called an "Interrogative word" which specifies the answer to make it suitable for the question, the "Who" here is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy which has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. Second: "asked" is a verb in the second condition of the forms of the verb, which are divided into three types: Regular, Past, or Past participle. and the verb "asked" is in the "Past" condition, which talks about the time that is gone and no longer exists. The original form of this particular verb is "ask", which is to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, to summon what the answer wants from the previous two points, it's that: The answer wants to understand and know about the person/human/homo sapiens/guy who wanted to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, in order to answer this question, we will have to identify two points: First: What was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked? Well, to understand this question, we will NOT have to understand what is the answer. We will just have to understand the definition of "Question" The "Question" is A sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information. Questions could be identified using the "Interrogative Words", which we talked about earlier. these "Interrogative Words" are nine, which are: Who, What, Where, Why, Which, When, Whose, Whom, and How. We are going to explain each individually: As we said earlier: "Who" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. "What" is specifying a non-person/non-human/non-homo sapiens/non-guy who either does not have a brain that he can understand and think properly with, like plants, or objects, or they have a brain, either that their brains cannot understand and think properly, like animals, or their brain can understand and think properly, but their species/type is rather different from the society, like extraterrestrial creatures, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A(n) animal, plant, extraterrestrial creature, or object. "Where" is specifying a place, city, country, continent, etc. where something happens, or some(one/person/human/homo sapiens/guy), plant, animal, extraterrestrial creature or object which exists in a place, city, country, continent, etc. "Why" is specifying a reason for doing something. "Which" is specifying a choice of either two or more choices that the receiver of the question usually chooses. "When" is specifying a time in which either something already happened, or something will happen in either near, or far future, for example: "When will anyone save me as I was captured by MatPat for trying to comment a joke about his video?" "Whose" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, and that person/human/homo sapiens/guy owns something, or someone ( if he is a human trafficker ), and the sender of the question is trying to find who owns that something, or someone. "Whom" is an old-fashioned term, not often used today. Many native English speakers are less than clear about its accurate use. In fact, the word serves the same purpose as "Who" questions, which as we said: specifies a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human, but tends to be used when it is the object of the verb. With modern English, there is no real need to use the term. "How" could be referring to the way something is done or refers to the status of the receiver of the question. Now, let's get back to where we were talking: Questions can be different, and many, and the possibility of guessing the question could be high or low according to the frequency of using it, but guessing a question which was asked for the first time is very difficult, so, it is not specific what was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked. Second: What is the purpose of the question "Who asked?"? Well, it could be referring to roasting someone as the humor of "No one asked.", and it could be referring to actually asking a question about who asked the question. So, here's the answer to the question "Who asked?": It could be anyone who made something unlikely for the others or someone who asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else. (s)He could be you. (s)He could be me. (s)He could be Elon Musk. (s)He could be even your mom. as long as they have made something unlikely for the others or they have asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else.

Thanks for your lengthy and interesting comment. If you don't mind you can DM me the demo file. Also the E1M8/E4M3/Black Tower all-ghosts footage was staged by manually setting the blockmap width to 0 as soon as I fired a shot. Those positions and angles will most likely not cause the bug normally.

Which country?

@@fordunfocus VietNam country because my name is over there.

@@vietnamgamingtm does Vietnam need the N to be capitalised?

I already covered those in the Arch-vile video.

This leads to the very mysterious question: "Who asked?" Well, to understand the question, we have to understand the answer: So this very particular question is asking about who asked, the question is divided into two parts: Who & asked "Who" is what is called an "Interrogative word" which specifies the answer to make it suitable for the question, the "Who" here is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy which has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. Second: "asked" is a verb in the second condition of the forms of the verb, which are divided into three types: Regular, Past, or Past participle. and the verb "asked" is in the "Past" condition, which talks about the time that is gone and no longer exists. The original form of this particular verb is "ask", which is to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, to summon what the answer wants from the previous two points, it's that: The answer wants to understand and know about the person/human/homo sapiens/guy who wanted to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, in order to answer this question, we will have to identify two points: First: What was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked? Well, to understand this question, we will NOT have to understand what is the answer. We will just have to understand the definition of "Question" The "Question" is A sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information. Questions could be identified using the "Interrogative Words", which we talked about earlier. these "Interrogative Words" are nine, which are: Who, What, Where, Why, Which, When, Whose, Whom, and How. We are going to explain each individually: As we said earlier: "Who" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. "What" is specifying a non-person/non-human/non-homo sapiens/non-guy who either does not have a brain that he can understand and think properly with, like plants, or objects, or they have a brain, either that their brains cannot understand and think properly, like animals, or their brain can understand and think properly, but their species/type is rather different from the society, like extraterrestrial creatures, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A(n) animal, plant, extraterrestrial creature, or object. "Where" is specifying a place, city, country, continent, etc. where something happens, or some(one/person/human/homo sapiens/guy), plant, animal, extraterrestrial creature or object which exists in a place, city, country, continent, etc. "Why" is specifying a reason for doing something. "Which" is specifying a choice of either two or more choices that the receiver of the question usually chooses. "When" is specifying a time in which either something already happened, or something will happen in either near, or far future, for example: "When will anyone save me as I was captured by MatPat for trying to comment a joke about his video?" "Whose" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, and that person/human/homo sapiens/guy owns something, or someone ( if he is a human trafficker ), and the sender of the question is trying to find who owns that something, or someone. "Whom" is an old-fashioned term, not often used today. Many native English speakers are less than clear about its accurate use. In fact, the word serves the same purpose as "Who" questions, which as we said: specifies a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human, but tends to be used when it is the object of the verb. With modern English, there is no real need to use the term. "How" could be referring to the way something is done or refers to the status of the receiver of the question. Now, let's get back to where we were talking: Questions can be different, and many, and the possibility of guessing the question could be high or low according to the frequency of using it, but guessing a question which was asked for the first time is very difficult, so, it is not specific what was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked. Second: What is the purpose of the question "Who asked?"? Well, it could be referring to roasting someone as the humor of "No one asked.", and it could be referring to actually asking a question about who asked the question. So, here's the answer to the question "Who asked?": It could be anyone who made something unlikely for the others or someone who asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else. (s)He could be you. (s)He could be me. (s)He could be Elon Musk. (s)He could be even your mom. as long as they have made something unlikely for the others or they have asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else.

I didn't know about the block map either, or at least didn't remember. I did read parts of Game Engine Black Book: DOOM and learnt about BSP trees there but the way this guy explains these concepts is excellent.

This leads to the very mysterious question: "Who asked?" Well, to understand the question, we have to understand the answer: So this very particular question is asking about who asked, the question is divided into two parts: Who & asked "Who" is what is called an "Interrogative word" which specifies the answer to make it suitable for the question, the "Who" here is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy which has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. Second: "asked" is a verb in the second condition of the forms of the verb, which are divided into three types: Regular, Past, or Past participle. and the verb "asked" is in the "Past" condition, which talks about the time that is gone and no longer exists. The original form of this particular verb is "ask", which is to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, to summon what the answer wants from the previous two points, it's that: The answer wants to understand and know about the person/human/homo sapiens/guy who wanted to say something in order to obtain an answer or some information. So, in order to answer this question, we will have to identify two points: First: What was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked? Well, to understand this question, we will NOT have to understand what is the answer. We will just have to understand the definition of "Question" The "Question" is A sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information. Questions could be identified using the "Interrogative Words", which we talked about earlier. these "Interrogative Words" are nine, which are: Who, What, Where, Why, Which, When, Whose, Whom, and How. We are going to explain each individually: As we said earlier: "Who" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human. "What" is specifying a non-person/non-human/non-homo sapiens/non-guy who either does not have a brain that he can understand and think properly with, like plants, or objects, or they have a brain, either that their brains cannot understand and think properly, like animals, or their brain can understand and think properly, but their species/type is rather different from the society, like extraterrestrial creatures, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A(n) animal, plant, extraterrestrial creature, or object. "Where" is specifying a place, city, country, continent, etc. where something happens, or some(one/person/human/homo sapiens/guy), plant, animal, extraterrestrial creature or object which exists in a place, city, country, continent, etc. "Why" is specifying a reason for doing something. "Which" is specifying a choice of either two or more choices that the receiver of the question usually chooses. "When" is specifying a time in which either something already happened, or something will happen in either near, or far future, for example: "When will anyone save me as I was captured by MatPat for trying to comment a joke about his video?" "Whose" is specifying a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, and that person/human/homo sapiens/guy owns something, or someone ( if he is a human trafficker ), and the sender of the question is trying to find who owns that something, or someone. "Whom" is an old-fashioned term, not often used today. Many native English speakers are less than clear about its accurate use. In fact, the word serves the same purpose as "Who" questions, which as we said: specifies a person/human/homo sapiens/guy who has a brain to think about the surrounding stuff which surrounds him, which distinguishes the person/human/homo sapiens/guy from animals, plants, extraterrestrial creatures, or objects, so the answer should be as I said in the abstract: A human, but tends to be used when it is the object of the verb. With modern English, there is no real need to use the term. "How" could be referring to the way something is done or refers to the status of the receiver of the question. Now, let's get back to where we were talking: Questions can be different, and many, and the possibility of guessing the question could be high or low according to the frequency of using it, but guessing a question which was asked for the first time is very difficult, so, it is not specific what was the question that the subject of the answer to the question "Who asked?" asked. Second: What is the purpose of the question "Who asked?"? Well, it could be referring to roasting someone as the humor of "No one asked.", and it could be referring to actually asking a question about who asked the question. So, here's the answer to the question "Who asked?": It could be anyone who made something unlikely for the others or someone who asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else. (s)He could be you. (s)He could be me. (s)He could be Elon Musk. (s)He could be even your mom. as long as they have made something unlikely for the others or they have asked a question which could be a hint to treasure, or a last "sentence" from somebody, or something else.

yep

I'm sorry to inform you, sir, but there's at least one person on Earth who likes Map21... ... and he's in this thread right now.

​@@MrCantStopTheRobot FUCK FUCK ITS NOT ME ITS NOT ME I SWEAR ITS IRONIC I SWEAR I ONLY LIKE IT IRONICALLY

@@MrCantStopTheRobot we must take their legs off

@@kingwaffleton1774 alright, hand me the chainsaw, and we'll start the investigation...

You monster

That’s crazy.

Marphy is that you?

the skelotons got angry and became ghost skeolotons

@@yawg691 A monster you say? No... I'm a god!

same

It's all finished!

@@decino nice one! I’m buying my first house and moving in this week. We’ve bought a lot of stuff that needs to be built (furniture mainly). Hoping it goes well!