Having the periodic table in the current grid form is just a preference. It is an abstract representation of atoms that has simply became popular and is thought in school. It is just atoms arranged by some order, nothing more.

​@@marpool8029 Of course it's preference. It's just one of the most convenient orders to organise elements because the degree of filled electron orbitals is the property that most often predicts chemical properties. This leads to the periodicity of the elements. The fact that the most common elements are the light elements containing s and p orbitals and so add up to eight is where this whole octave thing comes from but it's not some secret pattern or whatever.

@@marpool8029taught*

cant hear you over the elevator music

Yes I just started this vid and that repetitive beat is actually so distracting lol

It’s terrible habit to add background noise just to irritate the listener. You should try and watch Angry Astronauts videos, he have one 5 seconds jingle that is on repeat and as loud as his voice.

I can’t finish watching it because it is like nails on a chalkboard for me. I have severe ADHD and the fight for my attention between his voice and that AWFUL music is just a lose lose 🤦🏻‍♀️

like an intro tune that never ends

Yoo uploader this chill lo-fi dogshit music is PURE COCKBREATH, turn that musical brainrot off.

Dave's manner is hostile, but his evidence is irrefutable. It isn't new-age conjecture or "I am so smart I have discovered what no-one else has ever been able to see" snake-oil bullshit. Some people are ripe for the picking and they are falling over themselves flocking to this guys lunacy.

Professor Dave and a ton of other content creators take a really aggressive stance towards anything that implies change to their current way of thinking. I honestly don't care whos right I just wanna know the truth of it all. Appreciate you being here my friend!

@@fictionmusicproductions I'll give Dave some point for trying to answer w/ known popular scientific result. But he speaks like a child and thinks insulting makes he's argument true. He presents results that are theoretical as absolute truth. He reveals how lacking his view of modern science is. He's a fanatic and a believer. He has been stripped of his human innate logic.

Appreciate you my man. Trying my best to stay rational 😂

I thought the same thing at first, but rolling right into a person theory of a device being "in tune" with a person as it's explanation of functioning for only that person immediately nullified the point for me....

Please stop this madness. This video was 20 minutes of nothing. Why do you need Terrence to be right, please explain it to me. -Cambridge maths student

​@@alexanderying1558I really wouldn't waste your time trying to get sense out of people who know nothing about science.

was going to say that.

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@alexanderying1558I agree with Alex to an extant. There really is no point getting into a dialogue with most of these types of folks because they don’t seek truth. They only feed their fixations. 30 years from now these ideas might still float around because that’s just how folks are. But it won’t get them anyplace. There’s no model or no work, no technology that can be done with these concepts. Because that’s all it is. Concepts that don’t work but are communicated in a way that some find intriguing and that keeps them engaged to pass the time. It’s a shame curious people can be influenced by bunk. But many will not give you the time to show them the truth about things. Coz it ain’t about that. We can try and help some who are lost in some of the deeper places these types of things may lead some of em. And we should work harder and better at education and community as well as debunk the crap out of bunk and try our best to not let people become indoctrinated. But these folks are gonna be enthralled by things like this instead of the sometimes boring work of real science and all we can do is try to create a bridge for dialogue with them. But often you will get no where with these types of folks on a KZfaq comment section. And if you aren’t a patient person then back away slowly before your head hits that wall haha

Our present science has reached a ceiling this is obvious . as cavemen we stumbled over lightning fires and only got better technologically at burning up our planet. Check out the American classic a dweller on two planets you will find some great reference information and some great Atlantean science

Teslas wireless electricity would interfere with a lot of frequencies we have running through the air today. We would have to completely change everything but apparently I don't know shit because TERRANCE HOWARD has blown my mind... He can't multiply 1x1 but the dude is still a genius

@@brianrussell5789 He multiplies 1x1 the way the universe would have been teaching us if we had understood correctly to begin with. You aren't supposed to try and understand what he is saying with the laws of math that you have been learning. You are supposed to play into what if what you have learned is wrong. And go from there. If you try and play along you'll see that not only is what he is saying correct. But it's also more precise than what you've learned anywhere else.

@@gargoyled_drakeYes, in order to “understand” you have to literally stop using your brain. 😂😂 absolute marks

​@deezuschrist9794 no in order to learn a new way, you have to drop the thinking of the old way. Kinda like what has happened throughout history before time and time again.

​@@deezuschrist9794but you still believe you'll fall off the edge of the earth if yoi go to far apparently.

I got a ton coming for ya 😇

Appreciate it my man. Happy to be here and have you along for the ride!

Thank you my dude. I will be making many many more. Glad you stumbled on the channel!

Thank YOU for being here and allowing me to do it. Happy to help!

Glad to be here my friend, glad you're here as well!

@@BassForge_us Good on you mate ! The work you cover is the remembering. You're doing the "great work". I have afew videos on Australia and it's builders using the harmonic numbers in the Surveying and placement of the big public buildings. 144km. 72km. Tied to ancient sites unknown to the public. Enjoy if you get the time.

Thank you my friend, I'm still getting the feel for youtube but I'm not going anywhere anytime soon 😇

Greatful

Not going anywhere anytime soon my friend! Appreciate the feedback, glad to be here!

Shhhhhhhh they are listening...........

Bravo I'm already doin it Go do it

Same

The mental health crisis in this country is getting scary

I bet it did.🙄

Glad you're here as well. Appreciate you friend

Welcome aboard friend, I'm glad you're here~

Beyond reality is what we're shooting for here

@@BassForge_usI prefer to align my beliefs with reality.

​@@Thatchxl if that were true you'd be studying the universe firsthand but you're probably working a job that has nothing to do with "reality" 🤷🏾 I'd get it if you were one of tysons or sagans colleagues or students

@@Thatchxl unfortunately…Reality is subjective... Your idea of “reality” could and will be different from everyone else…and theirs too…and theirs….annnnd theirs

@@Bob-ih6fj perception is subjective, but there is an objective reality. Human knowledge has vastly expanded in the last 5 centuries because of the increasing use of the scientific method. Rather than just believing things that sound cool or seem intuitively correct, we can align our beliefs more closely with reality through experimentation and observation.

Appreciate this 🙏Thats pretty close to what I'm thinking as well

@@BassForge_us right on, brother. I deeply appreciate your work. Keep making waves, sir! 🌊 Chat more in your next vid!

We all do, but i think the steps are going in the right direction finally

"I think what terrence says makes a lot of sense, even if I don't understand all of it." If you DID "understand all of it" you would quickly realize that it DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE AT ALL

@@westbethkid How so?

We just need more open discussion on the topic that isn't colored by opinion. We all know it works, just gotta get more people like malcom bendell willing to test it out

Also in nature, one cell can make itself into two. 1x1=2

@@ryanroberson9499 cells multiply by dividing. 1/.5 = 2

I thought you were joking but it seems you're serious 😂😂😂😂 wtf

@@AfterbrunchDelight Not just cells. Ask a farmer if you can take one plant and make two out of it. Those are laws of nature

Wave conjugations aren't a thing. There's phase conjugations in relation to sending and receiving signals.

dude go study chem , they are both morons

Appreciate the hell out of this my friend, happy you're here!

Thank you so much

Cannot thank you enough for the support, only thing keeping me going on here 🙏

Check out my instagram and TikTok, I try n do exactly that 😎

He didn't "explain", he theorized. HIS perception, by no means empirical evidence.

He explained and is FOOLED by Lucifer and his first lie 😂 I'm sorry but I'm not stupid

​@@kennethmichael5404people can't think for themselves

Lol. I'm fascinated by the fact that people buy into his BS.

​@Fluxion11 why do you think it is BS??? Like TH stated he has 97 patents which I believe legitimise his findings....!!!!!

@@dionnejohnston.1785 mendeleev's p weer periotic table works extremely well and Terrence doesn't even understand how it's organized. He doesn't know what an isotope is. His ideas on mathematics are absolutely absurd. Look, I can't stand the current state of academia, but that doesn't mean 1×1=2. He says a bunch of science jargon and puts it together in a bizarrely fascinating way, but he doesn't really know what any of it actually means. The guy is a crackpot. Lol

@dionnejohnston.1785 🤡🤡🤡

@@Fluxion11 we don’t know what any of it really means. Because, it’s just our current understanding of the universe. It has been upended before. I don’t think people buy into it as gospel right now. Some see it as interesting, others see it as complete nonsense. Regardless, automatically resorting to name calling doesn’t look good for people who claim to be leaps and bounds more intelligent. It just looks trashy. At least have an open mind about reality. Maybe our current understanding has some flaws, and his theories could fill in some gaps. Look up tangential flight drones. This is TH’s theory in action and they look crazy.

Well said, Appreciate this!=

Can you explain unlimited bonding? Please make some videos soon i have subscribed. Hello from mumbai

Profound and enlightening theories. Thanks so much for sharing your wonderful wisdom with us.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nduca7KV27OYpYk.html timestamped

@@TBARBL jeeze that's interested

Love Rodin as well! I'd love to see a organ episode with him that would make my day

​@@BassForge_usI found Marko/VBM around 2006 around the same time as Nassim and I had the VBMning discussion board for a good many years. Many of the VBM images you'll see floating around were made by me on CAD. I have talked with both Marko and Randy Powell once each over Skype in the past, I'd love to chat with them in person but I live in Australia. I've done work into the other MOD systems and the Fib (and Fib-like) sequences but I can't do 3D CAD stuff which makes it hard and I don't know Algebra well enough to turn these torus skins into formulas etc... (I'm would love to find someone that can turn VBM into a 3D software program of some kind) :) :) :) 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9 MOD9/BASE10 (Modeling a single basic torus) Prime Axis: 3-9-6 "9" is the central point of mass/balance point/stillness. "3" and "6" are the "two holes" in the torus which are really one (inseparable) but represent equal and opposite vortexes simultaneously expanding on one side and contracting on the other. Secondary Axis: 1-2-4-8-7-5 This sequence can be seen as 6 unique nodes representing three-dimensional space (XYZ positive and negative) AND as 2 groups of 3 (1,4,7 and 2,5,8) AND as 3 groups of 2 (1,8 and 2,7 and 4,5). It runs both forward and backwards (5,7,8,4,2,1) It is organized by triangulation AND polarization. It is like the Merkaba or Star-tetrahedron that has spin applied to it with the axis of rotation through two of the 8 tips which means there are 8 points around a central point (9) but two of the 8 points are distinct in that they are acting as points of rotation (3 and 6) for the other 6 points to rotate at the affect of the stillness at the center and the fixed points of rotation at the poles. So 6 out of these 9 points on the Merkaba move relative to the center AND the two poles as it spins (These nodes represent the bare minimum to represent 3D space (1,2,4,8,7,5). Two out of these 9 points (3 and 6) move relative to each-other (opposing spin/change/time). One of these nodes "moves" relative only to itself which is to say it is the stillness or "truly fixed point" required to create motion/vibration/energy etc; the "9" or center (existence/ISness). Number systems with unique (non-repeating/non-superfluous) structures and fractal coherence only seed from primes but the first possible prime in this case 3 because it needs the dimensions allowed for by 3 that 2 doesn't have. Three squared (9) provides the topological matrix necessary (2D space tessellation with central tiles) to describe 2 axis of rotation around linear substructure (1,2,4,8,7,5 are X/Y curving around 3,9,6). The 3,9 and 6 represent the counter-space of the vortex (the "hole in the donut"/Hyperboloid) that is as much the "thing" as the "thing" is...if you get my drift. :) They're as inseparable as the poles of a magnet or the counter-rotating exchanges of air and water in a whirlpool. The 9 is always the central singularity of counter-space (in MOD9, if it were the next prime squared it would be 25 instead of 9 but still fulfilling the same role) with 3 and 6 representing the counter rotating spin of the opposing vortices on each side of the torus that constitute an axis - the prime axis. The secondary axis is the "meat" of the torus itself which is AT THE AFFECT OF the prime axis. It is the torsion which is the result of the counter-space axis. The 1,2,4,8,7,5 is a polarized vortex that describes a basic sine wave, a vibration which simultaneously compresses and decompresses. The torus has the unique and extremely important property of "SELF-RELATIVITY" meaning that it can move relative to itself without the need for a "separate" addition of "something other-than" itself. In this way it is ALL-ENCOMPASSING, permanent, immortal, unceasing, perpetual, eternal, the Alpha AND the Omega, the One that IS the All and the All that IS the One.

Everything said here has been thoroughly debunked by real scientists not actors moonlighting as physicists. It was actually hilarious to those of us who know BS when we smell it.

@@venussimo my apologies for not consulting an enlightened master such as yourself. Enlighten us on the holes in his theories!

Appreciate this my friend, just trying to offer a new perspective 🤙

I heard your wish my friend, glad to be doing long form!

Its in the works!

Appreciate you being here my friend, absolutely will

Absolutely will 😇

Happy to be here. I've been wanting to get on youtube for so long now.. Much more to come!

the only "movement" happening here is a "bowel movement"

You absolutely do. I think the barrier to understanding is finally starting to crack a little bit and its making me quite happy

Sound and electromagnetism are completely different forms of energy. Ultrasonic waves don’t turn into light, and low frequency electromagnetic waves don’t become sound. A transducer is needed. Your can have neural connections that associate sound with colours or other images.

@@blacksa160 But you're a 3 dimensional being. How are these phenomenon represented in higher dimensions? You can't answer. Because you're effectively a cartoon on a piece of paper to the higher dimensions. When you introduce other dimensions, all bets are off and anything is possible. Maybe in these other dimensions, these things are seen as similar, where light and sound are seen as length and widths. Or, they could in fact be as you state. But as 3 dimensional beings, we can't assert anything as inherently false.

@@defrank1870 I shouldn’t be replying because it’s probably a waste of time, nonetheless. I will say it is inherently false because from our common reality it is false. and when I say false I do not mean false in absolute, but in means of probability. It is most likely false given our common reality and knowledge. Whether at a higher dimension it is true or false -we do not know, and have no evidence of either side. So using the tools we have and what we do know, it’s inherently false.

@@blacksa160 and that's what Howard was getting at. We need to revisit our tools. Which is fine. We have AI and calculators that may make reinventing the wheel trivial.

I think its the future

This is all nonsense brainrot lmao fym

Going to be my new home 😇

Great to hear 😁I got way more for ya!

Not yet but I'm working on it now!

@@BassForge_us I need the audio version please

Welcome aboard my friend!

When someone makes a hypothesis in science they will submit it to peer review. And then other scientists will try to disprove the hypothesis (or shit on it if you will). If there is enough evidence for it and it cant be disproven it will become a theory. Terrence or his ideas have gone thru exactly none of this process.