This video tutorial for A Level philosophy students explains the difference between deductive and inductive arguments
Пікірлер: 142
@ohmgmarilyn5 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU. You have no idea how much I appreciated this.
@anjummadani7 жыл бұрын
Short, to the point and good examples - this is great for all ages not just A level! Thank you!
@arr17657 жыл бұрын
Very helpful! Would highly recommend. Clear and crisp for beginners without too much confusing theory.
@billywilliam77476 жыл бұрын
I like this explanation - so clear, brief and treat the viewers proportionally. Great Thanks
@carolynstevens64874 жыл бұрын
Thank you for helping a 71 year old.
@bugemberhona4 жыл бұрын
Pretty clear and adds on to what i got from my lecture this week. Thank you.
@katbos49957 жыл бұрын
I like how you're to the point without a bunch of fluff. I also like how you use the same example for both deduction and induction so I could compare. There's a lot of long-winded videos out there that don't help you understand the difference.
@PatMiano3 жыл бұрын
This is the best example that I have found and I have searched and searched, thanks a lot!
@abdinajibisse65503 жыл бұрын
Thank you alot, precise clear and understandable. believe me so far I have watched two videos of yours I have never understood from any teacher at anything the way I have understood from you. Thank you again.
@ventin756 жыл бұрын
deductive argument can only be valid or invalid. Inductive argument can be strong or weak.
@lindanorman7234 Жыл бұрын
What the fuck are you saying 😂
@user-xr9ue8bi3c Жыл бұрын
😊😊😊😊thank you !!!
@priscillayeboah65685 жыл бұрын
structure and the strength of conclusion...thank you lecturer for the kind help
@CeciliaNjoki.n3 жыл бұрын
You have amazing teaching skills, Thank you🎉🎉
@vikramnayyar56297 жыл бұрын
Hats off for u sir.. You helped me a lot
@mrmoffat7 жыл бұрын
Glad it was useful
@dr.manishkumar6496 жыл бұрын
Something very complicated explained in very easy way. Thanks.
@longbeachinthehouse4 жыл бұрын
My wig needed this and you did a great job of explaining it.
@gamistan7007 Жыл бұрын
Great Work Highly Appreciate
@danielapalomo71645 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the video!!! You made this simple and easy to understand. Thumbs up for you!!!!!
@redroseforyou42095 жыл бұрын
This was very good. Better than my math book. Thank you.
@hussaindevika5894 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your clear explanation, great voice!
@fatimahhabeeb47153 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU THAT WAS THE BEST VIDEO ON THAT TOPIC!!
@evangelia-elisavetvoutsino5729 Жыл бұрын
Great video! They differ in structure and the strength of conclusions.
@margaretbwendo15707 жыл бұрын
just what i needed for my revision. thank you so much
@Lharrell201012 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This explanation makes so much sense.
@adeelaism6 жыл бұрын
thanks sir, its very effective and usefull..very clear concepts thanks u
@munenemabunda27384 жыл бұрын
Very helpful and straight to the point
@tell-tailtale52204 жыл бұрын
I ntiyiso MuHlave. Na mina ndzi n'wi kumea hlamusela Swi twala.
@M.A.D4942 жыл бұрын
You are the best , you made it very clear. Thank you
@garibhuseynzade44983 жыл бұрын
I have watched a lot of videos to fully understand the differences between deductive and inductive arguments, but this one is the most helpful. Thank you very much!
@mrmoffat3 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped! Thanks for the feedback
@constanelecha8170 Жыл бұрын
This is good I have been fumbling about these arguments
@Managementlighthouse6 жыл бұрын
very nice.. u are master in teaching.....
@adityaputu21074 жыл бұрын
thank you for this video, Mr. Moffat
@fenallafoo12299 жыл бұрын
Thank you! It has helped me with my assignment! :D
@hellosunshine21683 жыл бұрын
Very informative description..... 👍
@massivemineer5654 жыл бұрын
I loved it...thank you so much sir.
@nasserzahranalkindi2820 Жыл бұрын
Great way to explain , well done , Thank you
@naglaaalyelsayed50735 жыл бұрын
thanks you are an amazing instructor
@thobekalondeka12776 жыл бұрын
very understandable, thank you so much
@mehrankhan98203 жыл бұрын
Love you sir well explained ❤️😘
@dhdsashti87889 жыл бұрын
Great video. thanks much!
@pedrocolon84783 жыл бұрын
heck of a lot better than trying to read all this again. Reading about this stuff gets Pedro sleepy. Pedro is sleepy. Pedro just finish reading. D or I? Thank you Sir, for the great content.
@EmmanuelMusukula3 ай бұрын
Out standing 🔥🔥🔥
@PresidentMcAwesomesauce2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Very clear without jargon that I cannot understand.
@daisysusuananarh24936 жыл бұрын
thanks for this video really helped me understand
@ninjanigingazaravlog88243 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this...now I know.
@osjalair2494 Жыл бұрын
Great lesson, thank you!
@DilipKumar-du1wo5 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir You are awesome.
@malaksaeedtareenmalakpatan30374 жыл бұрын
Thnx sir i understood 100 percent thnx alot
@MarcusRHill-kk6bw6 жыл бұрын
Using both methods simultaneously leads to madness. Welcome to the world of focused A.D.D.
@zlcopenhagen2 жыл бұрын
Wow thx so so much for this info
@dakshinatamang75276 жыл бұрын
Really nice sir.
@md.abdullahmohsin74012 жыл бұрын
Easy to understand. Thanks a lot
@azaraftimos35786 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your nice video.
@holyking4 Жыл бұрын
u are so fantastic please teach us informal fallacy
@londondiaries13214 жыл бұрын
precisely described.Thanks
@sadafwarisha42724 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir, how easily u explained us this topic
@sushmashree36143 жыл бұрын
This helped me a lot.
@nicoleipancompilations44702 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir! ✨
@subairuae3 жыл бұрын
Good job bro
@JavedIqbal-mr1uf5 жыл бұрын
Nice , Dear sir, please make videos on this topic"Effects of inductive method in learning process at secondary level"
@dianaulloa66086 жыл бұрын
Awesome thank you soo much
@VixenVulpix2665 жыл бұрын
this is very good.
@user-xr9ue8bi3c Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much sir 😊
@spadesofheart80785 жыл бұрын
thank you sir you help me a lot
@asaduddin524 жыл бұрын
Good dude, thanks you
@MrYap1234564 жыл бұрын
I LOVE YOU SO MUCH(no homo). YOU'VE SAVED MY LIFEEE MAN.
@jzlime3 жыл бұрын
Nigga had to throw the no homo in there 🤣🤣
@moniquewrites90468 жыл бұрын
I think your first example is inductive because it follows patterns and leads to an inference.
@marwaahmed26126 жыл бұрын
Perfect !
@evelyndabuo3272 Жыл бұрын
Thanks so much 🙏
@kailashbhatia82933 жыл бұрын
explanation is good
@shouldbestudying22357 жыл бұрын
Any relation to Steven Moffat? Great Video!
@iwatchvideos92664 жыл бұрын
I watched this entire video.
@hailegerea524110 ай бұрын
nice speech
@luffytarod.monkey68664 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this. I have an exam tomorrow.
@valentine24114 жыл бұрын
armyyy
@melissarodriguez28304 жыл бұрын
Can you explain why the God exist example is not Inductive please?
@trish70213 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@levinahakinyi60403 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much
@bigbrollydotcom7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for uploading/producing this. Am I right in saying that, at 5:30 in your vid, Mr Moffat might not have gone to work at all on Friday?
@mrmoffat6 жыл бұрын
Yes. Or worn different colour shoes
@evakonstantinou33312 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@mohamadabukela1837 Жыл бұрын
1. Deductive argument begins with general principle and ends with specific provision. In inductive argument we begin with specific provisions or observations and we end with general principles. 2. In deductive argument the conclusion is necessarily certain given that the premises are true, while in inductive argument the general statement is probably true even if the premises are true.
@blackmass25646 жыл бұрын
I think the probabilistic outcomes of inductive reasoning are evidence of the existence of everything.
@faithkorir483 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!!!
@mrmoffat3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@lasangeethennakoon12362 жыл бұрын
wow!!
@TracyJay17 Жыл бұрын
Deductive argument can be either valid or invalid while inductive argument can be either cogent or uncogent
@aayushisablawat13699 жыл бұрын
what about the premises and conclusion??
@adrianasagoe13934 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@abebebiru2177 Жыл бұрын
Wonderful! But there is/are deductive arguments that go from particular to general and inductive arguments that proceed from general to particular.
@sitaramgupta96665 жыл бұрын
thanks sir
@rev.ernestflores65826 жыл бұрын
1. DNA is the same for identical twins. 2. Identical twins are not always the same sexual orientation. C. DNA does not determine sexual orientation.
@dadanzhao42072 жыл бұрын
Thanks, sir, but I still have a question. Suppose that I want to understand the process of expert judgement in clinical medicine and through a critical literature review, I consider that this process can be explained from the perspective of knowledge. However, this is my understanding rather than an existing theory. Can I based on it to do deductive research in clinical medicine?
@mrmoffat2 жыл бұрын
All scientific knowledge is inductive. You accumulate more and more evidence in order to make the truth of conclusions more and more probable.
@tahahormozan6 жыл бұрын
It is like relationships between a scientist and an engineer A scientist finds the laws of nature by inductive reasoning Then by this natural laws which are discovered by scientists,engineers utilities them via deductive reasoning by expectations of validity of this laws in case if results was false it means that inductive reasoning failed and it needs to be corrected again by scientists
@tahahormozan6 жыл бұрын
Example at world war 2 When German were building v2 rockets to hit London they use Newtonian laws of physic But the results was failure problem was they didn't consider aerodynamic laws which affect on speed and range of the rockets
@xxsageonexx89105 жыл бұрын
The first deductive argument can be shown to not be necessarily true in real life. It doesn’t guarantee a future occurrence.
@healthtime84132 жыл бұрын
Hi doctor, I have these questions, this statement is inductive or deductive (abortion is wrong, because all human life is sacred). And the other one (jon will proably be promoted soon, since he is working here for longer time than the others). I will be appreciated if you answered
@harshita28702 жыл бұрын
Both are deductive as premises are general statements and results are specific.
@tarekegnetebo81723 жыл бұрын
👍👏👏
@summerculate0270 Жыл бұрын
How can we explain Deduction and Induction in Metaphysics?? Like with the example of God you've given
@saityavuz767 жыл бұрын
4:06 it won't "equally could be false",it is more likely to be true then not.But yes,it is not certain.
@mrmoffat7 жыл бұрын
A tad pernickety, but yes it is not 50/50 so point taken. Thanks for watching
@xmaseveeve5259 Жыл бұрын
He might work on Saturday or Sunday.
@user-et3vg6pd6d11 ай бұрын
Can some one summer use in there own words how the differ ? TIA
@woo_doggy Жыл бұрын
6:32 If you had seen your friend's swan, wouldn't that make it a deductive argument?
@sofinesim80213 жыл бұрын
I have some mistakes, gotta relearn. Thank you!
@BeeboHamido Жыл бұрын
Saying that deductive arguments' conclusions are necessarily true if premises are true is, in itself, an inductive argument that is probably true but not certainly true. Therefore, you can't say deductive arguments necessarily lead to true conclusions.
@ABGuruji7 жыл бұрын
superbly explained!! but in this video Speaker pronunciation for word "often" wasn't correct. :)