It's a shame he started and ended with Meskimen. It's really his weakest impersonation.

I got them all but Jack Nicholson and Colin Firth. I thought Nicholson one might be Bruce Willis lol

@@kittykittykitty7682 Or his best, since he has the whole damn world thinking that's his voice.

thank you for this - very much appreciated - well some of this was helped by the technolgy - what sold me on most was the body language - well done - impressive - and scary! I didn't get Tommy Lee Jones or Christoph Waltz (not all that familiar with their work) - oh George has not aged well! nor Nick! Robin Williams made my heart hurt

Anthony Miyazaki I got all of them but Malkovich and Firth

Absolutely! 👏

Bc of how accurately the faces match the body language

@@angelomordini6779 the facial expression too. Like when hes doing them they dont really look like the person hes impersonating weirdly. But when you see the deep fake you realise how accurate his facial expressions are

Possibly the greatest Robin Williams impression

Totaly agree.

Are you sure they didn't?

@@danielloeb2044 Probably not. The OLD BODY language gave it away.

​@@travisgordonusmcYou're saying he's a better actor than Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, AND Joe Pesci? Don't be so hyperbolic.

combined with voice cloning.. anyone can play anyone. They'll just have to license their likeness to the filmmakers.

They could, but they didn't! Instead, "they" made an embarrassing, ridiculous faces.....Pity!

That Morgan Freeman one is insanely spot on.

@@ProzacPreacher He even duplicates Freeman's long breathe pause that I didn't even realize he had until now.

Luckily we have a replay button to sit in awe twice over just so we can finally hear what the hooting harcckhh -- err-- what is being said...

okay im glad i wasnt the only one haha

Same

Frank Barone ligma balls

I was thinking the same thing 😂😂

Just A Jar Of Pickles Actually Bush had to practically break the law to get anything done in New Orleans by federalizing the State guard because their Democrat mayor and governor refused to do ANYTHING because neither wanted to take the responsibility. FEMA did great in Texas, Alabama and Mississippi where there was also major flooding and destruction. Of course a Republican got blamed for Democrat corruption, graft and incompetence.

@@Akihito007 Party pooper

Akihito007 - While there is certainly room for criticism regarding state AND federal handling of Katrina, most of that you just said is provably false. Please stop spreading misinformation. Also, what a dumb place to bring this all up.

Fatc, yo!!!

Same !

@@silverpooloflight Same here. He even has the subtle corners of the mouth going downwards.

Me as well

Same. Any time I see his face.

You are right. It's really sad.

Why, should be inspiring check out the cool new tech we got. Don't be so pessimistic the world has been going in a good direction. It used to be the weekends entertainment was the coliseum we're doing better each day.

Just realize that it's only the faces that are deep faked, the actor provided the voices (plus, he did put some effort into trying to mimic the facial expressions and the speed at which the actors he's mimicking would have probably talked).

@@xryanv I'll take the coliseum.

@@jimmyjimmy1601 The person who is worse off in the world today is better off then most from that time.

@@xryanv I say that because fuck this. I'd be perfectly fine if we lost every single bit of tech from the past 40 years.

To be sure

Yes, but there should have been a bit of an Austrian accent like Arnold's, though not as heavy. I didn't hear that.

Yeah...that's when you realize people could totally fabricate videos now, though :-0 literally could take clips from interviews and re-edit them to say whatever you want, really.

Have to 100% disagree. Couldn't see it. I might even do it better.

Honestly thought it was Jordan Peterson

I'd like to think that the US has enough smart people in place so that a faked Kim Jong-un video would not trick Trump into firing nukes. I'm not sure North Korea has experts that could stop Kim Jong-un from attacking us after seeing a deep-fake version of Trump announcing a preemptive nuclear strike.

Time to be a man and decipher whether or not what you see on tv and your phone or whatever, are even real.

Not really, video never was very trustworthy even before this...

@@Capeau I could see someone trying to make a deep fake video, posting it then trying to sue someone else for slander (i.e the deep fake they made slanders themselves). If done right and made to look like cell phone footage I'd be scared to see the results.

If you're dumb enough to fall for a texture put in front of a skull. You still have to find the right head shape.

KZfaq has been going downhill for a long time especially since being acquired by Google. There are many videos by youtubers like Coffee Break or Memeology101 that show how youtube doesn't help individual creators anymore because it's too busy helping established corporations. In fact if you look up "youtube artificial growth" by Memeology you'll even see how youtube is planning to flood the site with planted fake youtubers. People who share opinions are hit the worst because there is a lot of censorship, demonetization, and shadow banning of anybody who has even mildly politically incorrect opinions.

Because the first one was much much better. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a9iAfsiGvdCppnk.html

@@maskedbadass6802 so what do we do?

@@mikerosoft1009 Unfortunately there is no easy quick fix because youtube is pretty much a monopoly. The best you can do for now is to stay informed and talk to other people about what you see going on. Little by little as more people wake up you will see slow but steady continued migration to alternate sites like Bit Chute. It would help if more big creators also uploaded to Bit Chute, but for now support creators who are honest and don't support the ones who are clearly schilling for youtube or virtue signal constantly about how racist everybody else is. This is the long game unless somebody comes up with an alternative tomorrow. Lastly, it's a good idea to learn and stay up on politics because it helps you understand Big Tech's motivations for it's dumb decisions because there is so much going on that most people aren't aware of. For example, we live in a world where feminism is forced into our entertainment, and also where books that teach men how to seduce women are banned from major retailers like Amazon for political reasons, whereas hardcore graphic sex books are okay. Politics is everything nowadays unfortunately.

@@maskedbadass6802 Okay, but it's still free to post videos on KZfaq. One doesn't need 'help' to do that. If you're talking about monetization - which means ad revenue - then in my opinion this taints anyone who earns money on KZfaq; whether you call them a 'corporation' or a 'popular KZfaq personality'....in both cases they're profiting from ads. If you argue that it's expensive to produce polished, quality content then I respond: 1) No, it doesn't have to be. 2) One could earn that revenue from Patreon/subscriptions rather than ads. I watch a lot of stuff on KZfaq that's created by people who aren't trying to make a living doing this, and that stuff is just fine. I'll admit that my comments don't cover shadow banning or censorship. Those things are bad, but from what I can tell they're mostly limited to certain political conversations and maybe a little bit of the virtue signaling stuff. Horrible, but I expect this stuff to calm down soon enough.

yeah, with rubbish writing... like always...

There's probably actors already dead or missing, and we don't even know it. Look for future news articles using the words "filmed in secret".

Why not invent an actor? Invent an algo that generates a type of actor, one that is liked by everyone, or use templates for specific roles.

James Dean is being CGI'd into an upcoming movie, so it's happening.

@@alex20776a That concept was done in 2002 with Pacino "SIM-ONE", and in a funky-sillier way in Michael Crichton's LOOKER from 1981.

John Travis Gordon You can't turn off the news and the impact they make on people.

Deep Fake*

@@zavier3644 Created using DeepFaceLabs.

Yeah because his impressions are sometimes subtle but when you see the face you instantly understand how good it is.

@@jackmiddleton2080 It's weird because he's clearly really good at voices but looking at just him knowing the voice was Anthony Hopkins left me wondering if I could tell that one just by the sound, yet seeing Anthony's face *with* that voice, it was as if they couldn't be separated.

Seems to be tailor-made for this technology, really: the fact that it can map his facial mannerism onto the actual celebrities particularities can make for some really jaw-dropping impersonations. Tommy Lee was the first one that really stuck out for me.

like influencing elections or altering court video evidence. No way... **cries**

It's already being used. Someone hacked my sister's FB account and upload pornographic photos of her that looked realistic. Other friends have had similar things happen to them or people they know.

yet no one has

@pnut3844able HAHAHAHAHA !!

putting dead actors in crappy movies is pretty nefarious.

@@NOSUBSCRIBERSWANTED shut the hell up frank

@@NOSUBSCRIBERSWANTED There's no plan, the world is chaos. Will this technology cause confusion, make distinguishing between reality and fiction more difficult? Yup, it surely will as time marches on. Is there some deep and amazing plan orchestrated by a cabal of villains to make us accept it? Of fucking course not. It's just technology, used by most people for fun and entertainment, used by a slim percentage of asshats to make the world shittier for their own gain. That's all it ever has been.

Anthony Hopkins absolutely floored me.

There was no "white" Morgan Freeman, unless you mean the hair. I think they should have fixed that.

@@Galantski 3:45 is the timestamp. It's just Morgan Freeman with pale skin.

@@tokyomobster3072 Okay, i can agree with you to an extent, as his skin is lighter here, but it's only paler than usual. If you check out the ears, you can see that there's a bit of a difference.

Imagine the comments if they'd done a "blackface" at that point. OMG

@@LordHasenpfeffer Oh, just wait. I'm sure some affluent white liberal suburban woman will be horrified by the blackface, and launch a campaign to dox and cancel Mr Meskiman for doing blackface. If you think that is silly, you haven't been paying attention.

That's the one I kept waiting for. They saved it for last

@@kind2311 no?

Looks like Steve Martin and Patrick Stewart combined.

I clicked on it because the I thought it was Steve Martin in the thumbnail

I was waiting for his Harrison Ford.

If you watch a lot of his impressions, just his facial expressions make him look similar to the who he is imitating, that is a big part of effectively imitating someone, not just the sound, but the infection, the expression, the emotion. The deep fake just puts it over the top.

Look at just Jim, watch how his posture changes, how his eyes widen or scrunch, eyebrows, gestures. All these help to add to the authenticity of the performance and make an impression truly unique. We all have little ticks and things we do that go unnoticed by us and those who know us but somehow when those defining quirks are missing, we notice the impression is lacking in some way.

Patrick Stewart

more like steve martin and george w bush

He looks like a mix of Swill With and Lartin Mawrence.

De Niro* just letting ya know

more like Robot de Niro in some movements.

I instantly smiled when he came up

Thanks very much for your vote of confidence. It warms my heart.

You're so right... He crushed this one. Something you might try, cross your eyes and combine them in the middle, it's very interesting looking. Give it a try.

@@swankybutters8371 Thank you very much, Swanky.

Your absolutely right he’s great. I remember first seeing Jim in Fresh Prince of Bel Air great episode as Wills Teacher.

He was on Parks and Rec in a few separate episodes.

has that not already happened?

There's someone on KZfaq (Richard D. Hall) who says "Believe nothing of what you hear, and only half of what you see." He's going to have to change that to ". . .and nothing of what you see, either."

@@travisgordonusmc they will deepfake him especially now since things are heating up and people will be desperate for votes

For real. Most of them, actually. So much so that up until the Arnold Schwarzenegger bit, I was scratching my head at how they deepfaked the voices. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Did you watch the whole video? they are ALL spot on...

@@jacesaces15 Agreed! And the mannerisms too!

@@jacesaces15 I watched it. What I mean is the Robin Williams is the most accurate for me...

@@eyespy3001 All of these people are very famous. Its easy to gather enough data for a deep fake system to learn their voice. Then the actor just has to learn their speaking patterns and mannerisms to give a realistic performance.

Almost everyone.

@@Gambit771 Then you missed something deeper than even deep fake could make.

I paid attention

I actually had it on mute. lol

@Mercedes Moonlight Also not as hard as not being an asswipe, evidently.

imagine a collar around your neck, with a hologram-projector projecting somebody else's face on your own in realtime! the future is scary! :D

Ghillie Hoplite No, not really. Forest fires being bigger than ever before and the climate change is scary. Technology that won't exist even in a century isn't. The present is scarier than whatever fantasy thing we can come up with

The very last thing Williams would likely have wanted anyone to feel upon thinking of him.

Yeah ... in a few years all will be sad.

Now, genuinely, this would have made total sense. Don't know if anyone in Hollywood has even thought of this for such case, but, yes. They should do this every time an actor has to play a slight variation of themselves, like slightly younger or with different facial hair or whatever.

@@inceptional The thing that made Deep Fakes blow up in the mainstream was the terrible CGI Superman mouth. They wanted to shoot some additional scenes, but Cavill was already working on Mission Impossible and his character in that had a mustache, he wasn't allowed to shave it, so the had to CGI it. They spent a big pile of money doing it, and some guy put out a way better version using this type of tech for basically nothing.

Months

He is semi-famous. Or at least, you've seen him in movies and in TV shows. The problem is that he plays a different character each time, so no one makes the connection between all of them. jimmeskimen.com/acting/

He is a Scientologist too. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kLiJe8qQs76ul5c.html

is that THE garrett watts?

Completey agree

@@Shamook Me too!

Or all? That would be some cast.

Thank you, John!

No @@jimmeskimen thank you

@@johnrobichaud1983 Cheers!

Yes! There's so many people commenting about the tech or how close he was to the original. But if you watch this and just pay attention to what he said here, you will tear up.

Oh, yes. That's important to me.

Thank you, for what you do, Jim.

@@SharpDesign You are so welcome!

You're impressive.

@@quaidoralious4181 Thanks very much!

I agree, love what Jim and Shamook have done so far and it would be incredible to see some of Jim's impressions of the old Hollywood stars doing something along these lines. To hear and see Wayne and Stewart once more along with many others would blow my mind. I appreciate that deepfake may not be so good with grabs from old footage but I could live with that.

They are planning on bringing back James Dean, much to the great dismay of many movie fans and Hollywood celebraties..

Jimbo Bimbo not unless they're dead

Meryl Streep played Julia Child without the need for CGI. The performance is more important than the image. A real actor's talent is their power to allow for the suspension of disbelief.

Bush almost didn't need the deep fake. =P