Worldaviation 4K check out Robert Miles, he also has his own channel. Easy to binge

Mike Pound is a boss!

@@julius4858 thanks

666 upvotes, cant upvote it anymore.

true

facts

Yeah but DLSS 2.0 made half the video age like milk, considering they no longer train the AI for specific games anymore like DLSS 1.0

@@gardotd426 doest that mean that it would potentially work for retro games as well? PS2, Dreamcast or GameCube?

@@FuZZbaLLbee No. The game has to support DLSS

University equipment which he accesses through the uni server...

@@hypnoticlizard9693 which typically when updated and replaced will be sold to university staff at a huge discount. :)

@@dixie_rekd9601 At which point it's pretty much useless for anyone to game on.

@@DasAntiNaziBroetchen depends on the university... I have access to lots of 10 series Nvidia GPUs and theres a 2080TI theyre looking at getting rid of, simply because for the most part since theyre not buying it with their own money , a college can simply put in a requisition for a fair few new GPUs and get several of the most expensive models every generation. it depends what they need them for of course, but, say, a university that has a well equipped computer Lab and server setup, will want the latest greatest hardware no matter the cost.

well, those didn't have tensor cores yet

That was the best part of the video :)

Ironically not that hard to run these days and uses older AA tech :p Although funnily enough there's still parts that dip to 30-40 frames even today just because Crytek was betting on single core CPU performance getting faster than it did. Instead CPUs shifted to multi-core designs and Crysis 1's engine isn't well suited to that. Those sections also got stripped out of the console releases of Crysis 1 for similar reasons.

​@The Monarch I agree overall, however I would point out that some modern games feature equally or more advanced graphics and physics, however the difference is that they fail to incorporate any of this into the actual gameplay experience. For example the way destruction physics and object collison is handled is regularly on par or beyond what Crysis did many years ago, but you don't really notice it or are compelled by it because the game designers don't want to design core gameplay mechanics around the fact that the environmentis is accurately simulated and largely destructable, so they just choose to mostly disable it except for cosmetic purposes. What Crysis did exceptionally well was how it translated all the amazing technical advances of the engine into actual gameplay. It mattered that the physics were great because in addition of being able to literally blow stuff apart with grenades you also had a nanosuit that gave you super strength, allowing you to punch almost any object into orbit (well... at lest if you increased your strength value a bit with the ingame console), giving you a real sense of freedom and empowerment as a player, because you were allowed to realisticly engage these virtual environments on your own terms and with your own methods, in a way that didn't make you feel boxed into a specific, predetermined approach the developers wanted you to take. It mattered that vast amounts of foilage and terrain could be rendered in great detail with high draw distance and realistic lighting, because that's what it takes to recreate the experience of stealthily hunting your prey through a dense jungle like you're the Predator from Predator. Developers always talk about immersion as though it is achieved by graphics and other technicalities alone, however what matters most in my opinion is making the player feel like the choices they make are ones they came up with themselves, instead of having to pick them out of a small, arbitrarily constrained set of predetermined paths. Crysis was the perfect techdemo/sandbox/game-hybrid.

True!

> with almost negligable visual quality. hehehe.

Just experienced this in Death Stranding, 85fps DLSS off, 105fps with it on. (1440p, on a RTX 3060Ti)

I am using DLSS 2.0 on Cyberpunk and am pretty impressed with the results. I was skeptical going in, but it really does work. Be amazing to see how far this progresses in another year.

It's brilliant on Cyberpunk, the difference between me gaming at 1440p and 1080p.

LOL. At first I thought...his name's not peter.....but after a few minutes it sunk in. He looks like Tobey McGuire

yes they need a subtitle/caption to fix that

RCT never suffered from low framerate

@@MikeDawson1 if only youtube had a tool which would allow you to show text on top of videos after you uploaded them.....

Alexander Mitchell annotations are gone

Guess he's gone down the physicist route where time=space.

I might not know your reference but I do get the feel of it...

Stein Codes james grime is the host of numberphile

Not sweaty enough

If you have been, thanks for watching.

Search SingingBanana channel if you want to find more of his content

I am pretty sure it does. Devs have to develop the game to work with DLSS 2.0 And the list of games that do work is quite small.

@@brickbastardly +

We tried using this at my mapping company. It's performed ok.

Source?

I'm sorry you are poor

Dude, you need DLSS now!!!

480p for me unless it needs it. if i leave it at 1080, my internet cuts out and i go over my data limiy.

Well, you picked iphone yourself:) you could have gone to a much better screen for the same price

@@random_birch_forest Never said it was an iphone, not sure why you'd assume that? And being poor doesn't have that much to do with it either, I suppose I could buy a slightly bigger phone but it's still a small screen. I have a laptop, I just rarely watch anything on it because it isn't as convenient.

Hahaa, think he was going to say shaders. Still though, might not lol

Huh. While watching i thought he was about to say "shaders" and reconsidered, since not everyone may know what a shader is.

omg :D didnt noticed at first

Censoring the word "shaders" on this channel? Don't think so.

I'm pretty sure he was going to say "'shaders" and then realize that he was going to have to explain what these were.

What about Tom Scott? 🤔

You are correct... 1920x1080=2073600 2073600x4=8294400 3840x2160=8294400

Me too

@@filiphedman4392 Shun the nonbeliever!! SHUNNNNN

It makes my head hurt

HEATHEN!

Motion blur is the work of the devil. Much like fwd bmws.

the point was to show that when you have DLSS the game runs on higher FPS as opposed to TAA which is using more GPU resources and is 15fps lower than DLSS to produce the same graphics.

don't forget its for science!

It's probably more of a lack of time thing. He sounded like he used to game.

@C S That's just silly, how about a dedicated gaming Rig with an i9 9900K a RTX 2080ti and a bunch off RTX ON games

@@UmVtCg 9900k is dooable, 2080ti is dooable. RTX games... not so much.

His institution has the money .... I'm sure if he ask, they will do it.

Nice idea!

What if I want to look at the side of the screen? You can't know where the player will be looking.

That’s called Nvidia Multi-Rate Shading and it’s already in games like Shadow Warrior 2

@@IceMetalPunk How about eye tracking? Render what you are looking at in highest detail.

@@DJPsyq Boggles me why more games don't use this tech. Mix this with dynamic resolution and you have a winner for consistent framerates and decently crisp image quality.

Edge-detected antialiasing is already the standard. Super-sampling the entire image is generally considered the slowest possible implementation of AA and isn't really the standard option in any modern games.

Great Video by the way. I'm really glad you talk all these staf.

Exactly, I love Computerphile videos but this one was 7 minutes of just setting up the problem 5 times with the same words, and then the explanation is ok, but not really deep.

Slight correction. Multisampling calculates shader/texture once per pixel and stores result to all subsamples in pixel which are occluded by the polygon. Color, Z/Stencil buffers have all subsamples and every one is updated each time pixel is written. This is reason why only edges are affected and it still handles cases like intersecting polygons correctly. If MSAA would only affect edges of the pixel it wouldn't handle intersecting polygons correctly. (Like the 16xAA Parhelia used.)

It's not really a strict definition. I think in the overwhelming number of cases, people talk about the horizontal and vertical resolution, in pixels, not total count of pixels. People usually use megapixels as a measure if you are counting the totals... But that word is mostly just used when talking about image sensors or detail level of images. I've never seen "resolution" meaning anything other than x and y dimensions in technicaly imaging or programming.

It would be better to use networks trained for that specific case. I'm sure there are a lot of research to see points in compression/decompression in which neural networks would be useful.

The thing about perfect upscaling is that you are trying to create information that doesn't exists, which is impossible. In reality what upscaling algorithm are to achieve is a reasonable "guess" of the information that's missing based on the information you have. Long story short, CSI's computers run on Magik.

you can recreate actual information if you use multiple frames of e.g. a video. pixels of previous frames maybe fall between pixels of the current frame, so you can insert them there. for that you need motion information with sub pixel accuracy, look for "optical flow" and "super resolution" . temporal anti aliasing (TAA) does something similar but shifts the image actively to get information quickly.

@@TheAudioCGMan in that cases you mentioned the information it's there to start with, it's just "hidden".

*Professor

romanemul1 DL super sampling already exists some of which are really impressive. Two Minutes Papers has done a few interesting videos on them.

Time. That will need MUCH more that 16 ms :-)

4K sounds way more marketable. It's much better than saying the alternative.

2160p doesn't sound as sexy I suppose.