Democracy Vs Republic | What's the difference between a Democracy and Republic? Democracy Explained

  Рет қаралды 140,164

Illustrate to Educate

Illustrate to Educate

Күн бұрын

In this video we take a brief look at the difference between the two forms of government - democracy and a republic. We first do an overview of the two terms, and look at their general definitions. Then we look at the history behind the first democracy in Athens Greece and the first republic during the Roman Republic. Then we look at the common question of whether the United States is defined by being a Democracy or a Republic. We look at what the founding fathers believed as they met together during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Lastly, we look at what a constitution is and how that unique trait of a republic helps to protest the rights of the minority.
Sources:
www.thoughtco.com/republic-vs....
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic
#Republic #Democracy #DemocracyVsRepublic

Пікірлер: 651
@Gumby56
@Gumby56 Жыл бұрын
"We are a republic if, you can keep it---Ben Franklin.
@jngfitness2001
@jngfitness2001 3 ай бұрын
True, but sadly, that's always been nothing more than a fallacy and a lie $OLD to "The People!"
@KenBro05
@KenBro05 21 күн бұрын
We need to be more of a hybrid
@mikeh6084
@mikeh6084 10 күн бұрын
Someone needs to explain this to the Democratic Party because they are always getting it wrong
@maximilianogarciachirinos3663
@maximilianogarciachirinos3663 2 жыл бұрын
Excelent video. In my opinion I think the US is a Republic rather than a representative democracy because its laws are focus on protecting the individual rights rather than the majority.
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah I think that’s a really good point. 👍🏼Thanks for watching the video, commenting, and always being a big supporter of the channel!
@spacecat8230
@spacecat8230 2 жыл бұрын
ok
@tammydommel3039
@tammydommel3039 Жыл бұрын
Yes but did you notice the people who are big on pushing the whole Republic thing, really want a democracy? Majority rule and the word minority is a dirty word to them.
@maximilianogarciachirinos3663
@maximilianogarciachirinos3663 Жыл бұрын
@@tammydommel3039 With all due respect I disagree with that statement because a democracy can turn into the tyranny of the majority. In the case of the "minority" or labeling groups is against the rights of the individuals ,that enters into the realm of collectivism but that is another debate.
@terrywblake
@terrywblake Жыл бұрын
It is
@RMNornes
@RMNornes 2 жыл бұрын
I know I'm repeating many others before me here, but it must be said. Thank you for basic, straightforward educational materials without bias or agenda (other than education 🙂). Its nearly impossible to find this these days, and I REALLY respect your efforts and content!
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! It really helps contribute to the motivation to continue making more videos when I know people are appreciating them. Thanks for watching!
@spacecat8230
@spacecat8230 2 жыл бұрын
ok
@XLava_
@XLava_ Жыл бұрын
And it's in our national anthem
@warlord8954
@warlord8954 Жыл бұрын
@@IllustratetoEducate Except you're wrong. As I demonstrated with my comment, and historical sources. I didn't even get into the words, quotes, and writings of the Founding Fathers and the Framers. I didn't cite John Locke, William Blackstone, Montesquieu, Madison, Hamilton, Eldridge Gerry, and so many more. Not to mention the Anti-Federalists. You're putting out bad information that will continue to allow those seeking to subvert the beliefs, values, traditions, and the Constitutional Rule of Law, and pervert it into something it was never meant to be.
@tommyebunn5121
@tommyebunn5121 Жыл бұрын
​@@XLava_what is in our national anthem? If you're referring to "republic" that would be, the pledge of allegiance.
@painandsuffer
@painandsuffer 10 ай бұрын
"The ideal of a constitutional republic is individual liberty. In this century, great strides have been made toward the goal of subverting our republic and transforming it into a democracy. The foremost tactic of the subverters is the subversion of “language” - by calling America a democracy, until people thoughtlessly accept the term and use the term. Totalitarians have obscured the real meanings and principles of the American government.” Dan Smoot.
@amibrainwashed
@amibrainwashed 5 ай бұрын
Only two types of people support a Democracy. Morons, and those who which to rule them.
@adamdrouin2295
@adamdrouin2295 4 ай бұрын
Too bad the overwhelming majority of the population is falling for this trick
@grahamhodge8313
@grahamhodge8313 4 ай бұрын
I had to look up Dan Smoot on Wikipedia. Unsurprisingly, he was a right wing nutjob,
@mrbigglezworth42
@mrbigglezworth42 4 ай бұрын
@@adamdrouin2295It’s been a lie spread for decades. It didn’t happen overnight.
@d.h.jefferies2191
@d.h.jefferies2191 3 ай бұрын
Democracy.. ... Any form of government where the Supreme power is vested in the people's vote directly or indirectly........democracy.
@jameswilson313
@jameswilson313 Жыл бұрын
America was founded on the principles of a Constitutional Republic which protects the individual from their representatives and mob rule. Our founders assumed that men would be virtuous and honor the Constitution. Lacking any enforcement mechanisms allows unscrupulous politicians to circumvent and violate the peoples contract which is what we have today. Simply put, a democracy is universal equality and a republic is individual liberty.
@claytoncoker6489
@claytoncoker6489 Жыл бұрын
This subject confuses me (I didn't pay attention to anything but girls trucks in school). Do we want a democracy or a republic? I just hear democrats always chanting to the people that we're loosing our democracy, but that's good right?
@FarBeyondStrange
@FarBeyondStrange Жыл бұрын
@@claytoncoker6489 we aren't losing democracy. The US is not - and never has been a democracy. So what they are saying is factually false on both accounts. So no, we're not. Democracy also isn't inherently good. It's flawed. And not the best we got, despite arguments to the contrary.
@anael55
@anael55 Жыл бұрын
The founders gave us the ability to tear down recreate a government that was out of control. Without an understanding of the Bill of Rights & our Constitution, we are handing our power away to criminals.
@CD-vb9fi
@CD-vb9fi 4 ай бұрын
They did not assume men would be virtuous. They flat out said this would fail... and they put in safeguards and wrote about "what to do" when it does fail! They talked about it a lot too! Everyone seems to be unable to learn history despite having such great access to read the writing of the framers themselves!
@noncoincidencesynchronicit8896
@noncoincidencesynchronicit8896 Жыл бұрын
🗝 Straightforward explanation, that ALL should be able to understand in a few minutes! 👍🏼
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Жыл бұрын
Thanks! That’s the hope behind my channel! I appreciate the comment!
@CD-vb9fi
@CD-vb9fi 4 ай бұрын
but it's a lie... I can make up anything to sell a lie to.
@phreakmode
@phreakmode 9 ай бұрын
Dan Smoots take on this is highly recomended for viewing or listening to. He goes 1 step further and points out that the US system is a Constitutional Republic while explaining the dangers of a true democracy.
@CD-vb9fi
@CD-vb9fi 4 ай бұрын
Yes, Dan Smoots video is correct while this one is a lie.
@grahamhodge8313
@grahamhodge8313 4 ай бұрын
The USA is not a true democracy it is a representative democracy. The video explained how a true democracy is impractical. Did you not bother to watch it?
@diegrinder6851
@diegrinder6851 4 ай бұрын
​@@CD-vb9fiExactly. 100% Correct 💯❤
@easutube
@easutube 3 ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gcB_p6iT3N3Kf4E.html
@jimallen1186
@jimallen1186 27 күн бұрын
This one isn't a lie. It's just too simplified.
@ninjaboninjabanana
@ninjaboninjabanana 14 күн бұрын
Who knew there were so many constitutional scholars and experts on government in the comment section? This was a good video explanation and I use it to help explain the difference to my students. Well done.
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 13 күн бұрын
Nice! I’m glad to hear that (as a former teacher myself)
@TheRealMake-Make
@TheRealMake-Make 6 күн бұрын
Yeah, a certain sect within the country loves to say “we’re a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy” as if that makes their cult any less bizarre.
@seanannigans
@seanannigans Жыл бұрын
You draw the Constitution very well.
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Жыл бұрын
Thank you! 😊
@joebenson528
@joebenson528 Жыл бұрын
@@IllustratetoEducate 3:05 You were wrong here. The constitution does not allow interpretation such as "2nd Amendment only covers muskets" or "You can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater". Both of these interpretations are unconstitutional because "interpretations" are inherently unconstitutional they always seek to limit and not expand. The founders knew technology would evolve so they were intentionally vague in their wording. The constitution only allows added amendments that do not contradict existing ones assuming a significant vote will approve one.
@abdulazizmohammed7715
@abdulazizmohammed7715 Жыл бұрын
I like the fact that you are giving examples on each system. Keep going!
@morseventurechannel1365
@morseventurechannel1365 Жыл бұрын
We are a constitutional republic
@organikproductionz9347
@organikproductionz9347 3 ай бұрын
Yep and democracy is a lie in this country. No such thing
@movielover3986
@movielover3986 7 ай бұрын
God bless the republic 🇺🇸
@juliemccauslin5807
@juliemccauslin5807 3 ай бұрын
Amen 🙏 🙏 🙏 ❤
@aidansaviakjuk8311
@aidansaviakjuk8311 26 күн бұрын
Let's go TRUMP from Canada lol
@sherlock1895
@sherlock1895 3 ай бұрын
It was well done indeed. I never cease to be amazed by how many folks don’t know the difference. Cheers!
@rustyshackleford3320
@rustyshackleford3320 Жыл бұрын
And to the republic for which it stands
@francisdashwood1760
@francisdashwood1760 24 күн бұрын
Don't look too closely at the so-called Pledge Of Allegiance.
@EnchiladaBoredom
@EnchiladaBoredom 9 күн бұрын
Don't step on my toe.
@deepblue8327
@deepblue8327 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the simplistic unbiased explanation of so many misunderstood topics
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 2 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome! I hope this simple explanation can be helpful to those that are trying to get a better understanding of government and politics. 👍🏼
@spacecat8230
@spacecat8230 2 жыл бұрын
ok
@CD-vb9fi
@CD-vb9fi 4 ай бұрын
Unbiased? He lies in the video. Kratos is "strength, power" in Greek... NOT "rule". You can look this up... right? Or are you that incapable that you will just believe anything they say on the internet despite the fact you can look up greek words and their meanings online?
@ANTICOMwestcoast
@ANTICOMwestcoast Жыл бұрын
ACTUALLY... the US is a constitutional republic.
@naturaldisaster2
@naturaldisaster2 2 жыл бұрын
I was just thinking about this.....now I am getting a unbiased explanation
@naturaldisaster2
@naturaldisaster2 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 2 жыл бұрын
I’m glad you found this to be relevant to what you’ve been wondering about lately. 👍🏼
@spacecat8230
@spacecat8230 2 жыл бұрын
ok
@springcrocus7flower635
@springcrocus7flower635 Жыл бұрын
It is biased actually. He said we have both. May I suggest you go to Robert Breaker - Republic va Democracy.
@eemoogee160
@eemoogee160 Жыл бұрын
it's amusing that you consider this in any way unbiased 😂😂
@wulfbooy
@wulfbooy Жыл бұрын
Pretty sure they knew what they were saying when they said republic.
@allankahn1980
@allankahn1980 Жыл бұрын
Excellent breakdown of the differences! One thing to add is republics also allow the isolation of certain public things that can harm the public at large if left unrestricted. In America's case, we took the Monarchy (Executive branch), Parliament (Legislative Branch), and East-India Trading Company (Corporations) and isolated them together; so all Constitutionally created things, such as the United States (Washington D.C) and its Laws that pass will not effect the Freedom(s) that Americans have by Right. Thus, limiting and restricting the Republic's power to only Persons (Titles or Corporations) they create, and all who bear those Persons.
@tree_side_wind
@tree_side_wind 14 күн бұрын
Your instructional materials are well crafted. Thank you.
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 13 күн бұрын
Glad you like them! Thank you! 🙏🏼
@alfonstabz9741
@alfonstabz9741 Жыл бұрын
Republic ! Republic ! Republic !
@Rialuvs2pac
@Rialuvs2pac Жыл бұрын
Bros opinion is so oddly strong that had to chant in the KZfaq comment section without using all caps, but using a capital only after every “ !“ but only one letter of course!
@tobydulanski3000
@tobydulanski3000 Жыл бұрын
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
@chrisnichols9014
@chrisnichols9014 Жыл бұрын
*Insert Star Wars joke here*
@alfonstabz9741
@alfonstabz9741 Жыл бұрын
@@chrisnichols9014 🤣🤣🤣 red alert: yuris revenge.
@chillalewski7769
@chillalewski7769 Жыл бұрын
Hell yeah brother! Coming from a polish slav living in Germany. Europe is domed....
@sanrasuzumaki942
@sanrasuzumaki942 10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the great info video, just subscribed 😀 and going to check the rest of your stuff, thank you very much 😊
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 10 ай бұрын
Welcome aboard! I'm glad you found the video to be helpful. There are over 120+ videos to check out. And if you have any ideas for new videos, just let me know.
@warlord8954
@warlord8954 Жыл бұрын
The Framers, and Founders most certainly did not use "republic" and "democracy" interchangeably. In Article IV Section 4 of the US Constitution it states, "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government,". The Framers and Founders were fearful of democracies. They knew exactly what they were. " Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.” James Madison Federalist 10 and 51. Also, the Founding Fathers and Framers studied history. From Ancient Greece with Plato's Republic, Aristotle, Polybius, and more. They knew full well the meaning of a democracy or a republic. Each member of the House is elected by popular vote in their respective congressional districts, but Americans don't get to vote on federal laws. Not a democracy. Originally members of the US Senate were appointed by their respective state legislatures. Not a democracy. The President of the United States is not elected by popular vote but by the Electoral College. Meaning when you vote you aren't voting for the president you're voting for the electors of the party of the president in your state that have vowed to vote for the candidate of that party. Not a democracy. If people knew more about the differences, and histories between democracies, and republics, especially the Republic of these United States they wouldn't carelessly, and unthinkingly throw about the word democracy and attempt to claim that the United States of America is one> It was never meant to be one, or should be made one. Democracies always without fail degenerate into tyrannies, and dictatorships and everyone suffers. Lastly, not once will you find the word Democracy, democracy, or democratic in the Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress October 14th, 1774, The Articles of Association October 20th, 1774, The Declaration of Independence July 4th, 1776, The Articles of Confederation November 15th, 1777, The US Constitution September 17th, 1787, The Bill of Rights December 15th, 1791. But in your infinite wisdom and knowledge of politics, history, and law know more than they that created this nation, and you know more about what they thought, wrote, and spoke than they themselves. Try again.
@archiehendricks6093
@archiehendricks6093 Жыл бұрын
Dam their is someone who is awake, we hear both partys speaking of america the true democracy. Even putin saying we are. Horse shit. Democratic process and democracy are not same. Thats what I got from reading.
@danaerickson1777
@danaerickson1777 5 ай бұрын
Well said, I agree wholeheartedly 👍
@CD-vb9fi
@CD-vb9fi 4 ай бұрын
You are SPOT ON! I am so glad there was someone here a year before me to call out the lies in this video! Thank you for being an informed American! We are in very short supply!
@warlord8954
@warlord8954 4 ай бұрын
@@CD-vb9fi Thank you for the compliment.
@olheghtt
@olheghtt Жыл бұрын
Don't let this guy, whoever he is, tell you any different, America is a Republic.
@Mike-ne8eb
@Mike-ne8eb Жыл бұрын
Prove it.
@olheghtt
@olheghtt Жыл бұрын
@@Mike-ne8eb stupid
@p333t3r
@p333t3r 7 күн бұрын
Good video. You have some crazy Sharpie skills
@jasoncox9883
@jasoncox9883 Жыл бұрын
Loved this. Simple, straight forward, and short. Learned more now rhen i did in HS. Lol sounds funny but seriously what a great video.
@nomanmunawar4431
@nomanmunawar4431 Жыл бұрын
New subscriber thanks for these endeavors
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for subscribing!
@marciaperry6458
@marciaperry6458 Ай бұрын
This is a nice simple approach to understanding concepts that shift as all definitions of word do. I do feel that the role of the individual voter , which is not required in a republic, deserves to be noted as a critical and essential foundation of United States democracy. "Government of, by and for the People "requires ongoing direct input by the citizenry in addition to electing representatives to act on our behalf. A functioning democracy is designed to protect the majority from minority rule.
@mrnerd73
@mrnerd73 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this concept simple ❤
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@jameeztherandomguy5418
@jameeztherandomguy5418 2 жыл бұрын
The USA is strictly a republic, no? People vote for representatives, constitution, and minority is protected from majority are all republic things
@chandelier6811
@chandelier6811 2 жыл бұрын
It’s both a republic and a representative democracy
@justinweinzierl7547
@justinweinzierl7547 9 ай бұрын
You have to pay to live, die, travel, provide for your family and self. Go fish with out a license in a God made body of water or hunt on public paid forest (taxes paid for) if you get caught see what happens..? Court dates, fines, BS. What happen to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? You never even truly own your house/land -property taxes are rent, stop paying and they take your land. Same with car and registration. Right to travel is freedom. Freedom to move. Sounds like majority rule. Under common law, who did I hurt by getting 3 fish out of a natural body of water to feed my family? Pulled over for no seat belt? Where is the crime? No crime. Just majority rule making regulations and codes to follow.
@jameeztherandomguy5418
@jameeztherandomguy5418 9 ай бұрын
​@@justinweinzierl7547 None of these are relevant to what a republic is. The point of a republic is to reflect the majority opinion anyways.
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
@@chandelier6811 No. Republic and Democracy are different things, despite a federal department of education trying to conflate the two. We are a Constitutional Republic with democratic elections. Notice, democratic is an adjective, not a noun. In a republic, the government is not your ruler. It is delegated specific powers. Even if the majority wants to do some things they cannot if the charter (Constitution) did not give the government those powers. This is significantly different than a democracy or representative democracy where the majority can simply vote themselves the power to do what they want.
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
@@jameeztherandomguy5418 Close but you're missing a very important nuance. A republic delegates only a specific list of powers to the government. If majority opinion wants to do something NOT delegated to the government, then too bad, the majority does not have that power. This is often ignored by those who wish to conflate a republic and a democracy as being the same thing, but they are not.
@lesmith939
@lesmith939 3 ай бұрын
Well done.......thanks.
@jeffdishong4853
@jeffdishong4853 Жыл бұрын
We have always been a republic, but we do have many democratic tendencies.
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Жыл бұрын
That’s a good way of putting it! :)
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
Yes, we use democratic processes, but, that makes democratic an adjective, not a noun, which is a significant difference. This linguistic trick is being used to usurp more power to the government without ratifying amendments they know they can't pass.
@407flawda
@407flawda Жыл бұрын
2:30 I call bs because no where in the founding documents was the term democracy used.
@revolutionaryhamburger
@revolutionaryhamburger 4 ай бұрын
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.
@sidengland6302
@sidengland6302 2 ай бұрын
A republic protects us from democracy.
@user-ey4tt6do1e
@user-ey4tt6do1e 3 ай бұрын
Those of us who can read the Constitution and understand it vote for what is right. The fundamental flaws of Democracy have been known for over 2000 years to those who have studied history.
@eddiehancockii
@eddiehancockii Жыл бұрын
The constitution says we are a republic. End of video.....?
@nickturner8927
@nickturner8927 3 ай бұрын
Very well done sir thank you for teaching the truth 😊
@EliW95
@EliW95 10 ай бұрын
Most often a democracy is just a type of republic, but a republic is not necessarily a type of democracy. Venice and early American times were essentially aristocratic republics, and the process of developing mass democracy has only made things worse and has only made the regime more powerful, because people have been stup1d enough to believe that casting a ballot gives them any real choice, or can somehow hold people accountable while you give them special powers to do things that nobody else has the right to do, while people are muddied so much in their thought process to actually believe that they somehow consented to tyrannical acts by the regime in any meaningful way. Of course it’s even worse than that because most real power in practice is held by unelected even less accountable bureaucrats, bankers, and corporations while being able to grift off of the illusion of choice through elections
@Admiral-General_Aladeen
@Admiral-General_Aladeen 10 ай бұрын
Lmao you had me in the first part not gonna lie
@danaerickson1777
@danaerickson1777 5 ай бұрын
Kinda like “power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely 🤔
@NickHernandez2024
@NickHernandez2024 3 ай бұрын
3:37 just learned this, Judicial Review is not a constitutionally mandated thing or even named in the constitution. Judicial Review comes from the Case of Marbury V Madison
@haserotmalach7324
@haserotmalach7324 5 ай бұрын
On your next video, please, make the background music louder because I couldn't hear it on this one...
@richardcabellojr6377
@richardcabellojr6377 Жыл бұрын
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Жыл бұрын
Republic 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@goldenvulture6818
@goldenvulture6818 Жыл бұрын
Before Dwight D. Eisenhower became President "ONE NATION UNDER GOD" wasn't in the pledge of allegiance. He added it because of the Red Scare. Its a symbol of theocracy.
@EddieSchultz62
@EddieSchultz62 Жыл бұрын
"under god" wasn't added until 1954 on Flag Day. There's no evidence that any gods have ever existed, so it was silly to add it in the first place.
@5fingers4strings17
@5fingers4strings17 Жыл бұрын
@@EddieSchultz62 there's also no evidence of Darwinsm yet we consider it fact in the school system.
@EddieSchultz62
@EddieSchultz62 Жыл бұрын
@@5fingers4strings17 Okay, cool...You admit there's no evidence for any gods' existence. But there is a lot of evidence for evolution. The ToE is the best explanation for evolution accepted by about 99% of life science scientists, and evolution itself is a fact. I suggest you educate yourself on the subject. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution
@samestabar7274
@samestabar7274 9 ай бұрын
Democracy is not mentioned once in constitution or bill of rights that's the difference
@EnchiladaBoredom
@EnchiladaBoredom 9 күн бұрын
#DEMOCRACY
@rynwin1
@rynwin1 4 ай бұрын
We are a constitutional republic with democratic processes
@jasonmarton1448
@jasonmarton1448 23 сағат бұрын
Okay should have went into more detail about the minority having as much rights as the majority with examples? Which would be easy comparing states with less population to the ones with more! Actually there’s more examples but that’s usually an easy one to explain! Warm Regards and God Bless Y’all
@winninglifeyo
@winninglifeyo Жыл бұрын
I just want to point out that constitution does not grant power to overturn laws which is called Judicial Review SCOTUS granted themselves that doctrine in the 1803 case Marbury v. Madison
@rainick
@rainick 4 ай бұрын
On the flip side, if they don't have Judicial review, then the constitution is meaningless.
@KenH60109
@KenH60109 3 ай бұрын
The republic definition you use is with a constitution attached, and could, in many ways, be considered a representative democracy, as democracy mostly involves the rule of the people in some way, shape, or form.
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
The nuance you are missing is the inalienable rights. The "rule of law" means the laws are above even the government. The law is the ruler. And the supreme law is the Constitution, which limits the government to explicitly listed powers, preventing the government from enacting laws at the whim of a temporary majority outside the scope of the delegated authority in the Constitution. The elected representatives cannot legalize murder, theft, etc, no matter the majority opinion/vote because it is not delegated the authority to legislate these by the Constitution. This is how minority rights are protected and why it is significantly different than a democracy, where majority opinion rules absolute.
@lake5044
@lake5044 2 жыл бұрын
Who decides those rules that protect the minorities from the majority in a republic?
@LechDharma
@LechDharma Жыл бұрын
In America it is the legislature, and the Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of any and all laws/rights.
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
The Constitution. The government is only given an explicit list of powers. If the Constitution does not EXPLICITLY say the government is delegated the authority to do something, then it does NOT have that power. The government is currently violating this in MANY ways, but because most people are ignorant and/or apathetic about politics, we have not held them accountable to being Constitutionally limited.
@borzica
@borzica Жыл бұрын
For the Republic!
@chrisnichols9014
@chrisnichols9014 Жыл бұрын
Do it!
@zukyozelf7144
@zukyozelf7144 11 ай бұрын
You should make a video on the Democratic Republic of Congo
@ChrisModjeska
@ChrisModjeska 3 ай бұрын
This matches what I was taught in high-school, although it misses out on some important details, such as the fact that as few of 15% of Athenians were citizens, the rest being slaves and other classes of people.
@gersi3507
@gersi3507 Жыл бұрын
Very nice but kratos doesn't mean rule it means "state" wich means a state by the people
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate Жыл бұрын
Good clarification! Thanks!
@cmjassassin5002
@cmjassassin5002 Жыл бұрын
What is the Greek words of democracy? The word democracy comes from the Greek words "demos", meaning people, and "kratos" meaning power; so democracy can be thought of as "power of the people": a way of governing which depends on the will of the people.
@Naferner_Said
@Naferner_Said Жыл бұрын
Yea but we are currently an Oligarchy, because the 2 sides still cant figure out whats more important
@DylanRDunn
@DylanRDunn Жыл бұрын
Wow
@TheHonoredOne484
@TheHonoredOne484 Жыл бұрын
Which is the best form of government in the world 🤔
@lololazure
@lololazure Жыл бұрын
I would say it depends on the issues of the country so take that of what you will
@TheHonoredOne484
@TheHonoredOne484 Жыл бұрын
@Souven Tudu uniocracy what's that sounds interesting
@MinisterRedPill
@MinisterRedPill Жыл бұрын
Theocracy
@SuperMagnetizer
@SuperMagnetizer 4 ай бұрын
An engineering pilotocracy, because engineers and pilots know what works and what doesn’t.
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
There is no perfect, because too many things are trade-offs. If you don't have freedom, eventually you will have tyranny, even if it's on a small scale. If you do have freedom, you will have to accept things and/or people you do not like having freedom also. Should someone be allowed to be racist? If not, then you do not have freedom. If you have freedom, the laws do not stop racist people from being racist. They still cannot violate the rights of others, but they can be very offensive and say or do emotionally hurtful things, etc. So it's all trade-offs. "Best" then will depend on your values. Is it worth allowing your government to RULE you and take away your freedom when they deem they know better than you just so someone is not allowed to be racist? I'll take freedom every time, because with freedom also comes the right for me to choose to never associate with racists even if I can't stop them and the ability to speak MY conscience to denounce them.
@melodyqueen8440
@melodyqueen8440 Ай бұрын
#democracy #illustrated
@MS7000_
@MS7000_ Жыл бұрын
What if the majority in a democracy want something that isn’t right , morally or ethically? Then what ?
@Liliana_the_ghost_cat
@Liliana_the_ghost_cat 11 ай бұрын
Then they get what they want
@TalkingGIJoe
@TalkingGIJoe 5 ай бұрын
then we the people use the 2nd amendment to protect ourselves from their criminal actions...
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch." Benjamin Franklin So in a democracy, if the majority is not moral, the laws will not be, either. This is precisely why the US is a republic instead.
@domi69ify
@domi69ify Ай бұрын
So a republic is a democracy ruled by a set of accepted rules…
@johndrew9382
@johndrew9382 3 ай бұрын
President Woodrow Wilson, a college professor and president, gov of New Jersey, repeatedly said the entry of the US to fight in WWI was to, “Keep the World Safe for Democracy.”
@goskiing1410
@goskiing1410 11 ай бұрын
Excellent video - Seems like we just need a 'Chartered Democracy' then. Whereby people can make decisions for themselves instead of [lobby bought] Representatives. But there is a Constitution in place to ensure no laws that harm a certain minority group can ever be passed - Human Rights basically. ?
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
No, Democracy would be WORSE. A democracy, the majority can tell you what to do on anything the majority decides to. The point of a republic is to make sure the government CANNOT tell you what to do in protected things. Our problem is too many people who are IGNORANT of how this works so they don't get mad when our government violates the limits placed on it by the Constitution, or the ones who WILLINGLY ignore it because they REALLY think they should be able to tell you what to do.
@JCBjr15
@JCBjr15 Жыл бұрын
Personally what I get from this is that a republic uses many aspects of democracy but has more representation for under represented groups. One thing I notice however is that the democracy and republic have both the capacity to be good or bad depending on the context. A minority group could have massive advantages over other groups like wealth and power despite being a minority by numbers. But the voting majority could completely stall and even deflect meaningful and objectively good policy change at the same time due to bias.
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
No. A republic makes a list of powers the people give to the government. This is how people are protected from the majority. You simply don't give the government the power to hurt others. The only thing "democratic" about a republic is if they use democratic elections to elect their representatives. In this case, "democratic" is an adjective for the elections, not an adjective of the form of government and not a noun like democracy. They are different things. Moreover, "disadvantage" in this context is only relevant to THE LAWS. Everyone must be treated equally by THE LAW. It is actually IMMORAL to expect equal advantage or outcomes. Those require a dictator with a finger on the scales, which means some people WILL be abused for the benefit of others. Most things should NEVER be subject to "policy", no matter how much you think the outcome might be better. This violates freedom and opens the doors to tyrants.
@Columbina51
@Columbina51 4 ай бұрын
I'm confused is the Democratic back in the old days was the United Government and the Republic was the States?
@dustythurman5426
@dustythurman5426 3 ай бұрын
No. Nothing in the US is a democracy. The States were independent nations (sovereign). The States wanted to have something like a treaty for mutual defense and commerce. They tried several different things, but they all fell apart. Someone proposed what's called a federation - a union that is slightly more binding than a treaty. Most States said no, they don't want to lose their sovereignty. They wanted to stay independent States and just have an agreement between us all. The framers came up with this Constitutional Republic. In non-political speak, it goes something like this: "Look, we are not putting a new ruler over the States. The States get to stay sovereign. What we're going to do is put this committee over here and we're going to make a list of what they can do: 1. 2. 3. etc If it's not in the list, they can't do it. If it IS in the list, then we all agree we have to follow along with the rules. You get to send your own people to the committee and they get to vote on everything that happens. Also, we're going to divide up the powers in this committee. One branch executes the laws, one branch makes the laws, and one branch is to make sure everything is done legally. This way, we don't make a dictator. We're all using a Republic form of government, so we'll make this committee function as a Republic too, and every State that joins us must also agree to be a Republic. If we want to make any changes, it requires a super-majority of the States to agree so that States cannot abuse other States." Eventually, the States agreed. The "committee" is the federal government. The list of powers delegated to them is the Constitution. Sadly, the federal government is violating the limits of their powers in MANY ways, to include a department of education that does not teach this as it really is any more. Why? Because then the people don't get mad when the federal government exceeds it's powers.
@dallassegno
@dallassegno 3 ай бұрын
This is why America kicks ass
@SK-me9by
@SK-me9by Жыл бұрын
Time to go back to being a Republic.
@Dream-qy9ir
@Dream-qy9ir Жыл бұрын
Yeah, still don’t get it. What I gathered is a republic is a democracy that has a constitution
@valdavis7461
@valdavis7461 Жыл бұрын
We're a federal constitutional representative democracy AND a federal constitutional republic. Constitutional: Our system of government is considered constitutional, because the power exercised by the people and their representatives is bound by the constitution and the broader rule of law. Federal: Our government is also a federal system, since power is shared between a national government, representing the entire populace, and regional and local governments. We exercise our political power in a different way: by voting in elections to choose our representatives. That’s representative democracy. The Constitution does not use the term “democracy.” It’s true. But John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Noah Webster, Justice James Wilson and Chief Justice John Marshall all used the word. These scholars understood representative democracy - the American variety - to be democracy all the same. John Adams referred to the US as a representative democracy in 1794 in "The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, volume 6" on page 19. "No determinations are carried, it is true, in a simple or representative democracy, but by consent of the majority of the people or their representatives." Thomas Jefferson referred to the US as a representative democracy in his "Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies" in Letter CXXIL to Mr. Wendover on March 13th, 1815: "I consider the war, with him, as 'made on good advice,' inasmuch, as it as exercised our patriotism and submission to order, has planted and invigorated among us arts of urgent necessity, has manifested the strong and the weak parts of our republican institutions, and the excellence of a representative democracy, compared with the misrule of Kings, has rallied the opinions of mankind to the natural rights of expatriations, and of a common property in the ocean, and raised us to that grace in the scale of nations which the bravery and liberality of our citizen soldiers, by land and by sea, the wisdom of our institutions and their observance of justice, entitled us in the eyes to in the eyes of the world." In addition, Noah Webster in 1785, and St. George Tucker in 1803 edition of Blackstone referred to the US as a representative democracy, and James Wilson, one of the main drafters of the Constitution and one of the first Supreme Court Justices, defended the Constitution in 1787 by referring to the 3 forms of government as "monarchical, aristocratical, and democratical." He states: "Of what description is the Constitution before us? In its principles, it is purely democratical: varying indeed in its form in order to admit all the advantages, and to exclude all the disadvantages which are incidental to the known and established constitutions of government. But when we take an extensive and accurate view of the streams of power that appear through this great and comprehensive plan … we shall be able to trace them to one great and noble source, THE PEOPLE…." Sir William Blackstone, who was much read and admired by the framers, likewise used "democracy" to include republics: "Baron Montesquieu lays it down, that luxury is necessary in monarchies, as in France; but ruinous to democracies, as in Holland. With regard therefore to England, whose government is compounded of both species, it may still be a dubious question, how far private luxury is a public evil …." Holland was of course a republic, and England was compounded of monarchy and government by elected representatives; Blackstone was thus labeling such government by elected representatives as a form of "democrac[y]." Chief Justice John Marshall defended the Constitution in the convention by describing it as implementing "democracy" (as opposed to "despotism"): "I conceive that the object of the discussion now before us is whether democracy or despotism be most eligible. I am sure that those who framed the system submitted to our investigation, and those who now support it, intend the establishment and security of the former. The supporters of the Constitution claim the title of being firm friends of the liberty and the rights of mankind. They say that they consider it as the best means of protecting liberty. We, sir, idolize democracy. Those who oppose it have bestowed eulogiums on monarchy. We prefer this system to any monarchy because we are convinced that it has a greater tendency to secure our liberty and promote our happiness. We admire it because we think it a well-regulated democracy: it is recommended to the good people of this country: they are, through us, to declare whether it be such a plan of government as will establish and secure their freedom." So why does the word democracy not appear in the US constitution, Federalist Papers, etc.? It's because the framers couldn't put both democracy and republic in the same sentence to describe the nation. They needed a word that defined the US states coming together to form a nation. A republic was better described the autonomous nature of each state coming together. However, democracy is the lifeblood of the American Republic and the fact that the word democracy doesn't appear in the constitution or the Federalist Papers doesn't negate the words of the framers as noted above. We have to push back against the claim that we're not a democracy because it has sinister motives. What these people really want is an autocratic nation run by a demagogue.
@Snapsepaven1
@Snapsepaven1 4 ай бұрын
What's in a name? That which you call a rose, by any other name, smells just as sweet. -some british fella
@halladba101
@halladba101 3 ай бұрын
0:21 Kratos!!!!
@gordonflash8976
@gordonflash8976 3 ай бұрын
Why is it that people insist on calling it a democracy when it is not.
@Gulicktheemu
@Gulicktheemu Жыл бұрын
The U.S. IS a Constitutional Republic. Each State IS a Democracy.
@FernandoGonzalez-ub9iw
@FernandoGonzalez-ub9iw Жыл бұрын
Basically Democracy is the dictatorship of the mayority and Republic is the representation of the mayority and minorities in a context of laws.
@Kyle-fq4kq
@Kyle-fq4kq Жыл бұрын
@Souven Tudu dictatorship of the majority is an oxymoron
@richardcabellojr6377
@richardcabellojr6377 Жыл бұрын
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
@rainick
@rainick 4 ай бұрын
@@Kyle-fq4kq It would be more accurate to use tyranny of the majority.
@melanieclark7949
@melanieclark7949 5 ай бұрын
You said, "Democracy requires that the people be allowed to take part in the government and its political processes." People should be allowed and many don't. You also said, "All citizens who are eligible to vote take an equal part in directly making laws that govern them." Were all citizens not eligible? Were there requirements to be allowed to vote? Once upon a time only landowners, paying taxes were allowed to vote.
@geoffreygreen297
@geoffreygreen297 4 ай бұрын
Don’t worry about a democracy. We are a republic. Democracy is flawed and leads to dictatorship in every case.
@plate2105
@plate2105 8 ай бұрын
I'm a South African though I kinda agree with democracy
@k9er233
@k9er233 3 ай бұрын
Democracy defined: "2 wolves and 1 sheep deciding what's for dinner".
@jerrybell1766
@jerrybell1766 4 ай бұрын
Were both!Jeez!!
@kathleensue1
@kathleensue1 4 ай бұрын
The problem with democracy is…if one group of people take over the current ruling group…they rule and use their system. And so on and so forth and on and on. With a representative republic….or ours is a constitutional republic…we select or representatives. Plus we have a constitution that can not be changed on a whim…but requires 3/4 of the states.
@RichardShelton
@RichardShelton 3 күн бұрын
In a Democracy, if the majority wants my bicycle, they can and will take it. Period.
@mattharmon3838
@mattharmon3838 3 ай бұрын
We live in a republic.
@oversquare6625
@oversquare6625 4 ай бұрын
a Republic is a type of Democracy. Saying "what is the difference between a Republic and a Democracy" is like asking, "What is the difference between the Earth and planets". The Earth IS a planet.
@lilishyta-ep4wr
@lilishyta-ep4wr 3 ай бұрын
I think electoral college fits the constitution Republic, that some Academics and politicians want to get rid off, by giving power to popular vote ( where majority rules and ignores minorities).
@independent5564
@independent5564 2 ай бұрын
I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag, of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One Nation, Under God, Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for All.
@eemoogee160
@eemoogee160 Жыл бұрын
Why does it seem like the majority (99%) is being played pretty badly by the minority (1%)?
@justlol7281
@justlol7281 Жыл бұрын
They aren’t
@eemoogee160
@eemoogee160 Жыл бұрын
@@justlol7281 Sure about that? Check out the Princeton research that proves that the US is an oligarchy run by the elite few.
@Kyle-fq4kq
@Kyle-fq4kq Жыл бұрын
@@justlol7281 the minority determines who gets to run for office
@CD-vb9fi
@CD-vb9fi 4 ай бұрын
Because the majority is ignorant of the truth and they readily believe in the lies, some of which are peddled by this very video! THAT is why they are getting played pretty badly. The framers openly admitted that "Republics" are very susceptible to "foreign influences" which is why the USA was "Isolationist" for the first Century and 1/2. But the world needed to get the USA out of that so WW1 & 2 were started. Ever since WW2 end... USA became the very evil it resisted!
@ronaldsmith6829
@ronaldsmith6829 3 ай бұрын
You did fine till 2:35 when you went off the rails. Also, though many of the representatives at the convention were as ignorant about the form of government being proposed as you appear to be, the leadership, Madison, Franklin, Jefferson (in France but still involved) knew exactly what they were about. We have a representative REPUBLIC. ALL of the founding Fathers deeply distrusted a democracy. Additionally, all the previous democratic experiments had failed miserably! Madison,et al, didn't want to repeat that mistake. Much of what inspired the Declaration Of Independence and the Constitution was greatly influenced by the writings of Thomas Payne and Francis Bacon. When asked what kind of government had been established, Benjamin Franklin replied, "A Republic, Madam, if you can keep it!" Many of our states are making serious errors by turning their governments into Democracies. California is a good example of this type of mob rule. It's a disaster, and the state is coming apart at the seams as a result.
@springcrocus7flower635
@springcrocus7flower635 Жыл бұрын
So it sounds like we have a Republican because we have representatives and the constitution we follow or should. But the narrator says we have both. ???
@radioreactivity3561
@radioreactivity3561 Жыл бұрын
So... Republic is a representative democracy?
@icecreamjunkie6790
@icecreamjunkie6790 Жыл бұрын
Essentially, yes
@aabracadavra
@aabracadavra Жыл бұрын
As soon as he started defining the USA's governing style all I could hear was... a republic. He kinda lost me there.
@kellyjn12
@kellyjn12 2 ай бұрын
We are a Constitutional Republic. Ruled by the Constitution which limits govt. Democracy and Republic are competing political ideologies Representative democracy is a worse idea than a democracy. It’s easier to persuade 151 of 300 elected representatives to support legislation that is not in the public’s interest, than it is to get 165 million voters to support legislation that is not in the interest of the general public Just because we elect representatives doesn’t magically transform America into a democracy
@charleydan
@charleydan 3 ай бұрын
We have a constitutional federal republic. Republic is the right of the people to vote for representation as a majority. It is also the right of the people to be left alone and be a anarchist as was the articles of confederation. Constitution honors that in Article 6, clause 1. The very reason most American are not free note using their constitutional right to create the government one likes best
@arthurwatt5162
@arthurwatt5162 4 ай бұрын
We're a republic and democracy but NOT a monarchy. We rule by the people who elect rep. Who vote for them. They have ability to vote them out. Taking that away makes us a dictatorship. We can't go that route where only one man makes our decisions for us!
@markwrede8878
@markwrede8878 3 ай бұрын
In a republic, property owners decide what the public can decide.
@johnpatmos1722
@johnpatmos1722 4 ай бұрын
Did I understand right, that he said the U.S. is a "Representational Democracy"? So, how is that different from a Constitutional Republic?
@IllustratetoEducate
@IllustratetoEducate 4 ай бұрын
They’re very much related from my understanding and I think the US can be classified as both. A constitutional democracy is a government in which the people vote for representatives or laws, and in which the laws are authorized and constrained by a constitution. So the main emphasis is that there’s a constitution in place, which the US has.
@jefffortney4261
@jefffortney4261 2 ай бұрын
Govern, NOT rule! There IS a difference.
@donmilo4733
@donmilo4733 3 ай бұрын
Ya what about today
@baronghede2365
@baronghede2365 3 ай бұрын
I love Republicanism it's my favorite political government, Blessed Be.
@lasalleman6792
@lasalleman6792 3 күн бұрын
The US is both . Republican in the sense tht the chief executive is not hereditary. And democratic in the sense that most public officials who make important policy and pass laws, are popularly elected.
@derekeveretts8160
@derekeveretts8160 3 ай бұрын
United States is a constitutional republic. A republic is based on only electing representatives to represent the people. But a constitutional republic limits the powers of those representatives in order to protect the rights and liberty of the people.
@SK-me9by
@SK-me9by Жыл бұрын
Out with Democracy just as our forefathers intended. Back to being a Republic.
@SK-me9by
@SK-me9by Жыл бұрын
@Souven Tudu Wrong.. Wow, some simply choose ignorance.
@SK-me9by
@SK-me9by Жыл бұрын
@Souven Tudu Lol, I see. You're a child. Good bye have a great day little one (Remember folks never fear the Truth like this individual).
@bwanna23
@bwanna23 Жыл бұрын
Yeah. Throw 'We the People" out the window.
@SK-me9by
@SK-me9by Жыл бұрын
@@bwanna23 What are you talking about? Democracy is against the people not for their Freedoms. Pull your head out your ass.
@NF_0808
@NF_0808 9 күн бұрын
Is the United States a democracy? Yes, the United States is a democracy, since we, the people, hold the ultimate political power. We’re not a “direct democracy,” but we are a “representative democracy.” This is where our history education might add some confusion. We are commonly taught that democracy is a product of ancient Greece. It’s their word - demokratia - after all. The city-state of Athens is credited with implementing a system of government of and by the people, whereby eligible citizens would congregate to make decisions. They’d make these decisions themselves (or “directly”), not through any elected representatives. That system of government, better understood today as direct democracy, lives on in the United States in the form of ballot initiatives and referenda. Some states and localities afford their citizens the right to use these measures to directly enact, change, or repeal laws themselves. More commonly, we exercise our political power in a different way: by voting in elections to choose our representatives. That’s representative democracy. The Constitution does not use the term “democracy.” It’s true. But as Eugene Volokh notes in the Washington Post, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Noah Webster, Justice James Wilson and Chief Justice John Marshall all used the word. These scholars understood representative democracy - the American variety - to be democracy all the same. Is the United States a republic? Yes. The United States is a republic because our elected representatives exercise political power. History also tells us that Rome was a republic, unlike Athens. When its monarchy was overthrown, Rome developed a republican system of government whereby citizens elected officials who were empowered to make decisions for the public. That’s the core of how our government works. While “democracy” and “republic” have been historically pitted against one another, the reality is that the two terms enjoy considerable overlap. So, which term should I use? It’s really up to you. In practice, the word “republic” has the same meaning as the term “representative democracy.” And a representative democracy is a form of democracy in the same way that a Granny Smith apple is a form of apple. We wouldn’t say it’s inaccurate to use “apple” to describe a Granny Smith apple, so it’s OK to follow in the footsteps of Jefferson, Adams, Webster, and Chief Justice Marshall and simply call our “representative democracy” a “democracy.” But it’s also accurate to call the United States a “republic.” It’s mostly about your preference of words. Hopefully, this post will help lower the heat in the online debate. Let’s put our energy toward working to fix our government so it represents the people! What type of government is the US, exactly? To be very specific, the United States could be defined as a “federal constitutional representative democracy.” You might also call it a “federal constitutional republic.” Let’s break those terms down. Constitutional: Our system of government is considered constitutional, because the power exercised by the people and their representatives is bound by the constitution and the broader rule of law. Federal: Our government is also a federal system, since power is shared between a national government, representing the entire populace, and regional and local governments. These two terms can come in handy when you want to get really exact with your description. It’s accurate to call our government a “federal constitutional republic” or a “federal constitutional democracy,” but it’s probably overkill to be that specific. These terms just help us further define our governmental structure, especially when comparing the United States to other countries. Bonus: Is the United States still a democracy/republic? In the literal sense of the word, yes. In practice, the answer is more complicated. In 2016, The Economist Intelligence Unit downgraded the United States from a “full democracy” to a “flawed democracy” in its Democracy Report, an annual study of the “state of democracy” around the world. There were a number of reasons the nation’s rating fell, but one of the most important was the American public’s declining trust in government. Our system of government depends on citizens being able to freely elect leaders who will represent their interests. Unfortunately, that doesn’t always happen. In a study published 2014, two political scientists found that, on average, the policies representatives pursue are not in fact dictated by public opinion. This is the mark of a flawed democracy/republic: election without true representation. In 2021, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) classified the United States as a "backsliding democracy" for the first time. So, is the United States a democracy or a republic?
@bidav2114
@bidav2114 6 ай бұрын
Waiiit a minute! You are telling me there's no true democracy with your definition of it? Hmm, interesting!...lemme continue with the video
@dylanhunt3855
@dylanhunt3855 Жыл бұрын
“Is the US a republic or a democracy?” It is neither. It is an aristocratic oligarchy where a minority of wealthy people rule. To answer the question, is it a democracy or a republic, it is necessary to first determine who rules. If your answer was “the people rule” this is incorrect. The people do not rule in either a republic or a democracy. For that you would need to be a sortition. Only with universal suffrage and sortition will the government be a proportional, representative democracy.
@geoffreygreen297
@geoffreygreen297 4 ай бұрын
Read the documents! We are a Republic! The democrats party is trying their hardest to turn it into a dictatorship though.
@markhockman1368
@markhockman1368 8 күн бұрын
A few statements in the video can be taken out of context pretty easily to become misinformation or disinformation; otherwise, if the viewer listens very carefully to the entire video, it's not too bad. That said, as to the US form of government, let me state the following: On Independence Day, 1861, nearly 3 months into the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln gave a message to Congress, wherein he said: “[Referring to the Civil War] It presents to the whole family of man the question whether a constitutional republic, or democracy--a government of the people by the same people--can or can not maintain its territorial integrity against its own domestic foes." There it is, no less than our greatest President, who knew the Constitution far better than 100 of you and me, and far better than anyone on our national scene today, equating democracy and constitutional republic. And rightly he did, as democracy, according to our government today, means "a form of government in which the supreme power [sovereignty] is retained by the people, but which is usually exercised indirectly through a system of representation and delegated authority periodically renewed." Interesting how that definition perfectly describes our form of government. Again, take it from Lincoln, who described our form of government more ably and memorably than anyone in our history, when he concluded his Gettysburg Address with his words, “... that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth." What Lincoln there described is democracy, the form of government where the people are the supreme authority, the sovereign. From its beginning, “[W]e the people …,” through its end, our Constitution makes manifest that we, the people, are sovereign. It follows naturally that the word “democracy” derives from the Greek word “demos,” meaning “people.”
@stevesmith5031
@stevesmith5031 4 ай бұрын
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." say it again AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS...........What part of that d o people NOT understand. 1892
Socialism Vs Communism | What is the difference between Socialism and Communism?
6:19
Constitution 101 | Lecture 1
34:16
Hillsdale College
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
터키아이스크림🇹🇷🍦Turkish ice cream #funny #shorts
00:26
Byungari 병아리언니
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН
ROCK PAPER SCISSOR! (55 MLN SUBS!) feat @PANDAGIRLOFFICIAL #shorts
00:31
Democracy vs. a Constitutional Republic: Ayn Rand's Case
4:00
Ayn Rand Institute
Рет қаралды 227 М.
Democrats Vs Republicans | What is the difference between Democrats and Republicans?
5:32
European Parliament explained - 2024 update
12:25
Ciceroni
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Fascism Explained
9:54
Mr. Beat
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
360° Perspective: Democracy vs. Republic
2:33
KOAA 5
Рет қаралды 70 М.
Communism vs. Socialism: What's The Difference?
4:03
NowThis
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
Political Spectrum Explained | What is the Political Spectrum? | Left Vs Right
6:18
터키아이스크림🇹🇷🍦Turkish ice cream #funny #shorts
00:26
Byungari 병아리언니
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН