Mine too

democracy is too blame.

Agree India needs a leader who will allow free trade and FDI in all sectors abolish all tariffs total free market in all sectors including real estate.

@@nitishkannan2919 this however does not mean anarchistic control of capitalists

Don't worship him any longer. Deng disorted Chinese history. He has robbed lots of credit and shifted the blame to other shoulders especially Mao Zedong. He made the workers and farmers become oppressed again in a communist country. The leader that India lacks is not Deng, but Mao!

张三 啧啧啧

300 students would disagree

For all his faults, he witnessed a system fail horribly and steered away, that alone is a big achievement.

@Sahil Singh Yes he was

@@dmitrishostakovich9559 Socialism greatly improved the living standards of China's mostly peasant population. Before Mao took power in 1949 the average life expectancy was 41 years old, literacy rate was 15 percent, and the immunization rate was close to 0 percent. By the time Mao died in 1976 average life expectancy was 68, literacy rate was 80 percent(all young people could read), and the immunization rate was close to 100 percent. These are great accomplishments considering China was mostly closed off and one of the poorest countries in the world. People were living on like 2 dollars a day.

De wae

Well said

Follo me I kno da wae

Even when the way is blocked by peaceful protesters

Wrong. He didnt. He made mistakes. Huge collosal mistakes. What makes him great is his ability to admit to his mistakes and change. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pLNhmZmps8zbiqs.html

*Much better than the elementary school student China has now, growth lower and lower every year and want to grab power and stay forever*

His portrait must be the one displayed on Tinamen Square(sorry for the spelling) not Mao

@@alfredocubelo534 Yeah. Mao's ideals were far too ancient. Modern China wouldn't be if it wasn't for Deng.

@@dadian803 right? I get it that because of Mao, China became somewhat self sufficient in terms of weapons, and power(nuclear) but did its people's lives get any better? No, it only made worse when he initiated the cultural revolution.

Pu Du forever and forever

@@haimingyang2439 *Much better than the elementary school student China has now, growth lower and lower every year and want to grab power and stay forever*

I am from Brazil and admire him. We need inteligent people like him to make our world better.

Rightly said. Seems to me democracy is a problem in initial stages of development although better in the long term.

Just making problems for the people. Thankfully his term is near its eternal end.

XAIKIA Axom......i am totally agree with you....if our northeast part belong to China.... the Northeast part will be look like other city of China..... but it's very sad that northeast belong to India.. and it's very backwards parts of India no development no industry nothing is there... million of illegal Bangladeshi slums are full file in enter northeast specially in ASSAM. I am very Sorry for my bad english. But this is the truth.

Both BJP & Congress r useless

@@manishsingh-vk8if you may be right! Deng initiated China's Opening Up and Reform in 1978, gave up comintern, restored all tradition and culture (so that my family can worship Buddha at home), kept a low profile, focused on economy development and improvement of people's living, set up Chinese characteristic socialism - a kind of hybrid of capitalism and socialism which is good for China since heavily populated! Chinese are forward looking and still already solved all border issues using "Give and Take" strategy with neighbors excepts India. Allied with China benefit all countries people! China wants to modernize first, then democratize, India just reverses the path. Which one is better we will follow which one! May see it in the middle of this century!

Sure, North Korea is just a fake.

*Much better than the elementary school student*

Massacred people though

Average China propaganda enjoyer:

He was evil

This guy enabled the Tiananmen Square Massacre.

@@terenceangelo8714 and that is why china thrive today. If china was soft, it will be push around.... And everything will be worse for everybody

not at all. you know how many ethnicities are in Africa? now tell me what is the percentage of Han Chinese in China?

@@terenceangelo8714 If the rioters in Tienanmen had succeeded in overthrowing Deng Xiaoping, China would not have become what it is today a prosperous country.

@@riorio745 ji xinping more cool and calm

Visionaries can't do anything in India. No matter what vision you have, you have to win elections here. If your vision is not the vision of majority, one would simply lose and all Thier vision would go to drain . We need dictatorship like China

India and your religion is what stops progress.

@@laqueenawilliams4762 We certainly don't need an African women to lecture us about our rich culture and heritage. No, thank you :)

India will never be successful as China because of Religion

@@adee6467 Dictator should also be visionary, oterhwise you'll end up like north korea

i believed that China would head to a fairer society once it became a developed and educated nation, but recent policies from Xi Jinping has crushed any chance of China becoming a more democratic country, atleast at the local government levels.

@@dxelson Honestly i really dont want to see China becoming a democratic at any sense. The US is the purest example, because of the democratic government, any projects proposed would take years to actually get implemented, while China, any projects would just go all-in. Same with building rail roads, and other constructions. I dont see any reasons that China should be more democratic, if the current mixed market is working perfectly, then we should let it be. And more importantly more democratic means the people gets more power in terms of politics, which means, not only the smarts get to vote, but the stupid people will also get their meaning proposed, so in general will drag down the overall outcome, if not slowing down all processes. Feel free to reply.

@@jimmyhaotran123 I get what youre saying, thats why i said atleast at the local level. China is a country way to big of a country for democracy to work specially if half of the citizens are uneducated (not academically, intellectull wise, critical thinking). On one hand China get shit done, fast, no matter the consequences, on the other hand the common people dont get to have a say on anything. There are no public consultations for neighboorhood, city policies. whatever the party decides, it will happen. Any policy vote in the congress get 98% aproval, what even the point...just a formality. Look at the heating disaster during last years winter... Hitting coal targets at the cost of heating for northeaster chinese citizens? People should have SOME power. The country/ the party should work for the people, not the other way around. People fight and live for their country, not a political entity that has complete control over the country. The people should own China, the party doesnt own the People. Even the military pledges allegiance to the party first, the country second... There should be some more power balance within the political structure of China. Dont even get me started on censorship...Currently it has surpassed the accetable ammount of censorhip IMO...its actually quite rediculous. All in all, not gonna lie, China wouldnt be where it stands without "Socialism with chinese characteristics"

@@dxelson Your response were all on points. But there is one big thing that I am worried about. I wonder if the government once start to lose its grip on their power, wouldnt it become like all other countries right away instantly, excluding all other factors and whether it is good or bad. I am from Norway and grew up in Norway a country that is super super socialistic country, basically communism but just with another word. We pay high taxes, get hell alot supports economically from the government. Education is totally free even the college is free of charge. At the same time, I have also studied in London for 2 years, and 2 years in San Francisco, as well a sememster in China. So basically I have been through all types of systems. But deep in my heart I really dont want China to lose its communist ideology this soon. I am afraid that it will fall into the trap like all other developed countries were its annual growth wont be higher than 5. There is a huge correlation between that if you will, and I dont want that to end this quick. I guess you have heard of how the High Speed Rails that China is currently super proud of. Those rails werent profitable how you see it, one another video also talked about it, but they still are constructing it and trying to operating it at lowest fee as possible, just to speed up the economic forces, trades and easing all sorts of transportations. I guess this wouldnt be possible in other countries, if the country wasnt based on One Party only. Not to mention the One Belt One Road, so called Silk Road 2.0, and all those investments and lendings is super massive, that wouldnt have been able to pass the votes in any other countries. My point is pretty same as yours, but in a sense of not falling into the democratic way of thinking, at least not at this very critical moment.

@@jimmyhaotran123 I agree, it's too soon for China to have big reforms, maybe only in 30 years when China becomes a fully developed nation. It needs another wave of reforms with as much inpact as 1978 deng xiaoping reforms. Current president is instilling a personality cult in the young minds of the Chinese people. Let's just say we know what happened with Mao...

@StanislavyeungHK a metropolis

@StanislavyeungHK even if those exist it doesn't take away from shenzhen being a huge developed city.

@@yourfavoritenetcitizen6525 true, it even surpassed Hong Kong. Impressive.

@KLGoodman lol and westeners eat rabbit.. how is that different?

He lived to 1997, I don't doubt he saw the skyscrapers rise. I only wish he lived to see HK's handover, his personal project, take place 3 months later. China is forever in debt to him.

While at it, the Nobel prize for economics. It was a combined effort but someone had to lead.

He doesn't need one. He had a far cooler title The Architect

@@huutruong167 Vietnam war？

​@@huutruong167 deng came to power after the vietnam war had ended and Vietnam liberated Cambodia from the khmer rouge (which was also supported by the US).

The Nobel doesn’t deserve him bro

Daming buaya sa senate hahaha

ayaw nila sa RBH2 kasi tingin nila "term extension" daw HAHAHAHA mga tanga kasi eh

你们需要首先首先社会主义，在此之前，把自己国家搬离美国

@Meghanath lul🤢🤢🤢

Singapore is a small country. Transforming it isn't a Big deal

💯

*Like right now (result of current leader). Much better than the "elementary school student" China has now, growth lower and lower every year and want to grab power and stay forever*

simplicity937 ???

simplicity937 陰陽怪氣

the version i heard is Mao made Chinese people stand up, Deng made Chinese people rich

many chinese mainland hate Mao, my grandparent and his brother escaping abroad because mass starvation (10-45 million deaths) and yellow fever outbreak. Deng Xiaoping was critize Mao era but party is whitewashing Mao era

And none of them received Nobel prize

They said you are brainwashed

Deng made some capitalists pigs riches and other 90% poor and prostitutes

yup the only problem is that the term limits and our restrictive economy

yup the only problem is that the term limits and our restrictive economy

you threw him out remember? you threw marcos out. where did you think the uS companies wnr after edsa people power? it took decades to bring them back to the philippines!

totally wrong,邓小平回答过外媒说：没有毛主席，我们还在黑暗中探索光明

xiuxiuxiuxiuxiuxiuxiuxiu！！！！修正药业🖕

你的意思是以前大家都吃不起饭，但是比较下都很开心。现在大家都吃得起饭，但是有的人吃的多得能堆很多仓库，然后刚能吃饱的人说，还不如大家以前都饿肚子的时候

lavie maintenant north korea is dead without its nuclear weapons

Kim Dynasty too stupid to produce one.

They already have, he’s called Kim Jong Un

中文几千年了，是我们老祖宗留下来的，而且美观简洁，我们为什么要舍弃中文去使用英文呢对吧😂

And he actually receives far more praise that Mao in China.

He would not have done the reform without Mao's leadership to win the revolution and unify China. It's pointless to compare Mao and Deng. Both of them were heroes in their own time.

Until Xi Jinping is starting to overturn some of his reforms.

Can't :)

@@marisasagala5924 😢

Erdogan has completely controlled Turkey. . The future is difficult to emerge.If Turkey carries out social reforms, it will violate the interests of Erdogan's followers! ! ! He will not allow these things to happen.

The source is most likely biased.

Labu # Henry Kissinger the murder

Not sure about Henry, but i do know LKY and Singapore inspired Deng's policies.

If you want to say that then there is another important person Robert Kuok, one of the richest Chinese in Southeast Asia.

Are singaporeans tried to claims China success as their effort?

Japan helped a lot

Zu yes but still today china and hongkong are mad at each other because of the hong kong conflict

@Zu Most communist nations including the USSR confirmed that they are state capitalism.

Wooddog Shiba Inu ye

why not

India needs its own Deng Xiaoping. India can be just as developped or even more than China but the Indian government is inefficient and slows down Indian development sadly.

Deng > every other chinese leader since 1949

chiang > deng > mao

@@gnak2 秦檜>慈禧>chiang>deng>mao

@@user-ct2nk3ix8d Conservative?

Agreed

邓达 mao was a great general, warrior, a tough guy but not an entrepreneur in any sense.

@@kitb9504 He almost brought entire China to it's knees by completely destroying Chinese culture and instigating anarchy during the cultural revolution.

The country that invented paper money is likely to be the first to dispose of it... China. Almost no one uses cash anymore.

@@kitb9504 Mao was a mass murderer

@@BeerHombre deng Xiaoping realise communist utopia is a long process and can't be rushed like those before him. He actually infinitely better than mao. He make china more flexibly when he absorbed many capitalist idea