So disappointing. Why bother doing an X enhancement if you not gonna put the effort in.

Do it right or don’t do it

They literally could have made this backwards compatible and enhanced it for the X. Red Dead Redemption on the X looks better than this.

The X1X didn't fail to meet expectations. The dev's patch did.

Could have made it backwards compatible and let Microsoft upgrade it to 4k.

I would prefer the Xbox 360 releases to be backwards compatible.

1.6 TF vs 6.0 TF and they couldn't do more than 1080p "more constantly" and a weird 45 fps lock? Lol Lazy devs. @ 8:20 you say: "Microsoft's machine fail to match expectations". But what you should've said is: "Lazy devs fail to match expectations".

Lazy developers are to blame *what a shame*

So the game got a trash "upgrade" on PS4 Pro and also the Xbox One X? Christ these devs are lazy with this remaster

Halo MCC update, please! =)

The Physx effects in the original PC version looking amazing, made you feel more connected to the game world. Does anyone know of a reason that they have not been used in modern games ? I know it is an Nvidia technology but couldn't they license the tech to use in an engine or support AMD tech in the consoles ?

You guys are great and I appreciate all the uploads you do, I want you to know that. But this gameplay, omg

I’m glad DF expose lazy developers and keeps me aware on who I should spend my money.

The jump to unreal engine 4 and the resources' enhancements decisions are indeed to be respected, but it did nothing but hinder the game's performance and development. A 1080p lock 30fps for both Xbox One and Ps4 was more than feasible. Now Ps4Pro with unreal engine 3 is proven to take at least 1440p, same with xbox one x could have ran it at 4k 30fps. When they said the game ran at 1080p, I thought it was going to be 60 fps. Arkham Asylum, the masterpiece, is almost 10 years old now, 1080p and 30fps on the top hardware console is an insult.

You guys are doing incredible work ; always blown away with how much effort you guys put into this stuff.

Why are they trying to upgrade this game and not Arkham Knight? Imagine Arkham Knight at 4K HDR. I'm pretty sure they could get it done, but judging by this "remaster", you can tell they're just lazy and Arkham Knight would be "too hard" for them to implement 4K HDR into.

I remember Arkham City Armored Edition (the Wii U version) had a weirdly unlocked frame rate, too. What's up with them making that mistake?

I'd be ashamed to have a game running like this on either Ps4 Pro or Xbox X. What a disgrace.

I have tried to run both games in my xbox one x after hearing about the update but when the console runs them it does not tell me anything regarding an update for such games, at the same time, I notice no changes at all in the performance compared with the last time I played them... Can anybody tell me why this seems to happen only to me or if there is anything I should do to update the games to the latest version?

Glad to have seen this! Makes me want to wait to hold out for which version to get, as I have an X1X, and a base PS4 but wasn't sure which version of the game to get. Hopefully the X get's another patch to make it the best remastered version to play.

Funnily enough I've been replaying the Arkham series. I got most of them for free on Steam after what happened with the appalling Arkham Knight incident. Been playing it on 4K with all maxxed out (apart from full 8xMSAA). Still looks amazing on 4K 60fps teamed with an SSD. The Unreal Engine looks amazing no matter how old the game is

8:48 The PC version at max settings is still the best looking one!

Looking back at things in 2022 the 45 fps cap was very much intentional. The patch was so advanced it already took vrr displays into consideration)

Great analysis, I'm kind of surprised to see a remaster as these games are not that old

Can WB just give these devs some time to work on their games so they stop pushing out shitty ports? I have Arkham asylum on pc, and I can't run the game maxed out at 1440p because the game refuses to use more of my system. This kind of stuff is really frustrating.

This is crazy! What a lazy upgrade!

Best way to play city is to play it on pro unpatched with boost mode and supersampling on a high refresh rate 1080p monitor.Try it and you are welcome for how smooth it is it holds 50-60 now with those settings.Unfortunately Asylum can’t really be too much improved from how it runs now cause of how it’s coded even without a patch.

Amazing digital foundry put this up. I was actually searching for this video last night thinking it would of been up a while back. Im going to pick it up anyway after i complete spiderman.

Console fanboys at war When it's the devs fault

That Warner Brothers seal of quality.

Just curious how this runs on an 8700k with 980ti , i upgraded processor but not gpu. Only run at 1440p not 4k . Would i get a decent fps of 80-100 on a 144 hz screen?

3:48 Took out the wrong guy too soon. XD

I've been playing on Xbox One X, aiming to 100% both games. I don’t remember if this was the same case in Arkham Asylum, but in Arkham City, playing the challenges maps, the frame rate goes up to 60. I haven’t played the more difficult maps, were more enemies are on screen, but so far I think it has been a locked 60. I'd assume that in this mode the CPU has less things to do, so it has enough cycles to process the frames for a 60 fps target. Not sure if this also happens on base Xbox One or PS4.

We want mcc

I would like to see Zone of the Enders 2nd Runner on PS4 and PC do some comparisons, and do some comparisons on the VR side of things too with PSVR, Vive, and Oculus.

If the physical version is compatible on PS5 and Series X, do you think it will be possible to run City, unpatched at a locked 60fps?

When is Dragon Quest 11 coming? U guys find a time for old games but skip games like DG11 and We Happy Few.

play it on pc for true 4k experience

Bruh I play this on series s and it crashes every time I try to go to my destination

Yep. I'm guessing you guys got more recommendations for it, but thanks for doing this. It says what I already know, but the exact details is nice to know. I had noticed a small difference after having put it down to reinstall it. I was playing the 4K 60fps RE7 just prior to jumping back in to Return to Arkham (of which I had just played two days earlier) and I was disappointed by a lack of X support, only to come online and see that it just HAD one. I didn't see any difference. Not only that, but the game for some reason after several minutes of play time would totally shut my X off which was shocking. I knew it had to be the game and nothing else, so I just reinstalled the game. As I reinstalled it I was playing The Witcher 3, which is only 30fps, and once it was done installing I jumped back into Asylum to finish it up and noticed a difference, though even the frame rate still didn't feel like a steady 60fps. Going into City, that is even worse. Yeah, it's a disappointing jump. Also, it would have been cool to play a 4K 60fps, Unreal Engine 4 Arkham before Spider-Man coming out, even if that might be unlikely.

1080p no reason for me to replaying on xbox one x.

Lazy developer...

Was any of this patched? I want to play all three and origins in the highest quality possible on ps5.

I remember when my toaster of a pc ran the original at 60 fps 10 years ago... It's embarrassing that the base system cant run the game at that framerate

Can’t believe this series is still not 60 fps and enhanced. For free by the way. We’ve all bought these games multiple times and still not good enough

I wish they added an Xbox one x patch for Arkham knight

I know its kind of late to save these games but if you put the console on 120hz it stabilizes the framerate in both games

Wow, I had no idea this was the patch. When I first heard, I was honestly expecting at least 4k 30fps. I guess the PC version is still technically the best, at least for me. In my opinion, the new textures, lighting, etc are nice on paper, but the ultimately end up compromising the artstyle for me (i.e. the different areas of Arkham City look less distinct than they did in the original release). The PC version allows for better resolutions and performance, which is a win in my book. It's also not to demanding, a GTX 970 can run the game at 4k 60 at high settings in DX9 mode.

Could it be even more disappointing? Such a great Game deserves better than that!

Also if you think these dev's are being lazy stop buying these lazy cash grab remasters.

I'm surprised to see no mention of challenge mode, it runs completely different than the story.

Just I time for spiderman ps4 exclusive huh good work digital foundry

Remaster it for RTX. Arkham series can take benefit.

What the hell are the devs doing??? Why even say there's enhancements ?

i will play all Batman games in which row must i play? Is this the first one?

3:46 - No no no, you don't go for that gu-nevermind.

That's weird it should be able to run at 4k on a X

Dying to see an upgrade for Arkham Knight on xbox one x... This patch is in deed disapointing... Great video tho !

Currently replaying Arkham Asylum GOTY Edition on a laptop with MX150 at 1080p/60fps, and I think I'm gonna stick to what I got.

How long has this patch been out, is it new? I only ask as I really hope it's been out for a while because last time I played Arkham City it had a bug where getting killed would remove the frame cap, making for a much more responsive and smooth game. I'm not sure if it works from the very start of the game, I only discovered it after dying as Catwoman in the Iceberg Lounge against Two-Face but it does seem to consistently happen any time I die in the post-game content. It resets if you close the game but dying after loading your save brings it back. I just hope they haven't fixed it... Is there a way to refuse an update?

this game ports are garbage, even looks worse then original

Virtuous Studios are just lazy af. First, they released the collection in its worst form and then literally added patches of almost 12 gbs on both the games which couldn’t even fix the framerate to begin with. And then they proceeded to advertise an Arkham Origins remaster on their website which never saw the light. I mean, games that are almost a decade old at this point, can’t even play at 60fps. That’s how bad this fucking ‘remaster’ is. I get that it’s tough with a new engine and all, but what’s the point of a remaster if it plays worse than the original.

the 45 fps lock reminds me of how arkham knight was locked at 90fps when i played it on pc a while back

So when did this patch land? My version (1.4.0.0) hasn't been updated since last year...

There's a graphics mod with better textures for these games on PC... just use that its way better than these 'remasters' and you get 4k 60fps

People who are hyped about a series X upgrade for Arkham Knight should come back and watch this... Sigh.

Not to mention advanced GPU accelerated Physx on PC Nvidia. It's amazing how well Arkham City on PC maxed out holds up to a UE4 remaster. The PC version of Arkham City was truly a leap over console skus. My 570 remembers it fiercely.

This sounds like the "Silent Hill HD" of Xbone/PS4 remasters.

Before: “WOW!!! MegaMan looks great!!!” Now: 1080p? That is outrageous!!!

Thanks Digital Foundry, we asked, and you delivered.

i was waiting for this thank you

I have played both games in different platforms, including PC at Max settings... But my favorite of them all is the Wii U Arkham City, the extra features with Pad made it worth it at least for me, even if performance is not superb.

Not down to the console then.. Just rocksteady being lazy

Worst remaster, the most disappointing thing since The last jedi

Can someone tell me how does this runs on xbox series s ?

You forgot to cover up that Challenge mode on Asylum is 60 FPS for Xbox one X

Uncompromised 😂

I'll stick with my PC Steam versions that I picked up in a sale for pennies and are far superior on my 1080Ti. PC: buy once play forever.

Bought return on sale a couple weeks ago. Of course I beat asylum about 2 days before the x patch dropped. The frame pacing in city gets pretty annoying. Still, they're great games, and i'm glad I've finally gotten around to beating them.

What's the upgrade specs for Arkham knight

The gameplay is the most disappointing part of this video.

They should have just left the game alone it's dead.

Can we get an mcc patch analysis?

So is this game better on the Xbox one x or the pro ? I’m about to buy it and I have both consoles don’t know which to grab it for

Xbox one x la the mistake ...

Lol poor xbox owners

Textures bug on asylum and city with batman cape on xbox one, still no update to fix this bug....

New Samsung TVs have a 1080p Freesync range of 20fps to 120fps, really if they were going to run 1080p they should have just unlocked the framerate.

Shitbox One X :)

True 4k console Lmao

I can't beleive they don't run at 60fps.

If you have a tv or monitor that has VRR and the X1X, you will get pretty much locked 60fps for Arkham Asylum. It order to get 60fps on Arkham City, you’ll need the disc and a PS5 with the game unpatched.

The puddles look the same on the X? WTF IS GOING ON!?😂anyway, xbox does have grease proof controllers🍔🎮🍟😂😂😂😂

Ps4 runs it better than Xbox one x lol feel true power

This is really disappointing. Was so looking forward to this enhanced. What was the point with what they did?

Oooooh, gotta be the game with that "special" PhysX NVidia fog! xD

How to play Arkham games in 4K with only one simple step: Step one: Play on PC.

People need to know Xbox didn't sell as many Consoles as PS4/PS4 Pro so they ain't gonna spend hours on a Remaster.

And you forgot to mention Arkham city in Riddler,s Revenge is 60 FPS

Man, that sucks, these games are close to my heart, I've played them so many times but the fact that they changed pretty much nothing makes me sad. They would look absolutely stunning in 4k but I guess we'll probably never know