sometimes i like to stick to the original game (unless it's a complete remake) b/c of annoying things like this.

Its because physics at designed to 30fps, sorry for my bad english

Looks like BluePoint f'd up.

Uncharted 3 : Wavy scarf edition 😄

Because that’s the difference between a PowerPC tailored game and an x86-64 architectural remake.

+theDamon2781 Talking crap about a game without any actual reason is exactly that. Though, Uncharted is just another generic, over-milked AAA exclusive from Sony. The story isn't interesting, the gameplay is generic, and the environments look uninspired.

+Gabe Iturralde And that's why it has gotten nothing but great reviews and tons of goty because it's generic.

+theDamon2781 Great reviews and tons goty mean nothing. MGS V got 9/10s and 10/10s across the board and it had a horrible story, dead open world, and a bad ending.

John Smith All the more reason on why you should take reviews with a grain of salt.

+John Smith But that's your opinion not the majority's opinion.

But the aiming, especially with a pistol, was awful, making the third the worst entry on the franchise. But this video analysis states that on the PS4 version they fixed the aiming and say it is a completely different experience the players have. Now I think it's worth to try this remaster.

@@marcosladarense On PS4 it's the best out of all Uncharted games.

@@ccvtzvdv , no amazing multiplayer though.

Put it on PC, we’ll do some fixing ; )

@@ccvtzvdv lol no it's not...It's a sloppier version of Uncharted 2. It doesn't have the flow of Uncharted 2. It just jumps from locale to locale with little rhyme or reason...other than it'd be a cool set piece.

boy yah

+Hugo Azevedo Except it was Bluepoint Games, who ported and programmed The Nathan Drake Collecion.. And it's far from being the best looking game tbh

***** It has better animations than 99% of games. The lighting is beter than 98% of games , the water and sand effects are unmatched to this day.. Seriously the sand in mgsv is worst in every single way..

ThreeDaysOfDan The animations are ok at best.. It might seem better to you, because you haven't seen a lot of games in 60fps or higher, but that doesn't count as animation anyways. And lighting, water and sand effects aren't really that impressive. Look at the water in Crysis 3 for example. Textures look pretty good, but that's about it. The Polygon count is still low. I have the game right here and am not really impressed.. But again, it's just a remaster.

+ZephrylTV ???

The power of exclusives

Ratchet and clank and god of war ???

Free online?

nothing about uncharted 3 looks next Gen stop it

Tattoos by Guel Ummm, it holds up really well actually. In my opinion.

+RumbleGear Agree. It definitely holds up well. Still go back and play it and am still wowed. :)

It's not a hijab it's a keffiyeh

Exactly! What were they thinking!

It is moving at the 2 30 mark

@Gavin Davis maybe keeo watching. it does

@Gavin Davis They made it more realistic, at such speed it shouldn't be moving especially because its on his back, his body preventing the wind from pulling the scarf. This effect was used on PS3 to emphasize movement, it completely fake

@@NoBodysGamer hahahahahahahahahahahahahaa

+Pan Z You see how the surface around the pipe is darker than the rest of the wall? That's because there's a post process effect that's adding fake shadowing to that area. When Sully passes in front of it, you can see a halo of lightness around him where he passes that shadow. Watch in both versions when he raises his hand to his cigar.

+anonymousgamer Thank you. I see the halo that surrounds his hand now

***** Yea, we all like Richard best

+Pan Z funny thing about this effect is it also happens on GTA V for PC. It's so noticeable that I had to turn the damn thing off. Post processing still has a ways to go in video games.

Damn dude what a details

Abraham Moya same here Finally, I found someone else

Idk it's hard to top U2 but I still like 3.

But the aiming, especially with a pistol, was awful, making the third the worst entry on the franchise. But this video analysis states that on the PS4 version they fixed the aiming and say it is a completely different experience the players have. Now I think it's worth to try this remaster.

@@marcosladarense - That difference is very much noticeable! I probably logged in 9-10 play throughs with around 100 hours in the three years I’ve owned it. I know exactly how the game feels. I got to the first major gunfight of the game, during the underground London escape, and everything felt tighter!

I got it on ps3 plus lol. They even released it free for non PS plus members like 2 months ago

@@Jdogg4089 I ended up buying this anyways for the U4 multiplayer beta lol

+VassiliGamba i think the last of us remaster does. not so much here in my opinion. But the resolution bump and framerate are a very noticeable improvement :)

Indeed.

+Icaraeus the graphical step from uncharted 4 is still very big tho, the ps4 is capable of way better graphics than this collection offers. it would be a shame if not

+Icaraeus Proof?

*****​ That is a mere opinion.

+House Lannister I would easily pay for Gears 3 1080p 60fps.

+House Lannister Joffrey was a shit head. Just wanted to throw that out there.

I think they said they plan on making GOW 2 & 3 backwards compatible so it wouldn't make sense to remaster them although it would have been nice.

+AncientFury Would I rather pay 60 bucks for a game I already own with slightly improved graphics no but that's just me.

Thought I was the only one that noticed lol

+Saleem Effects exactly

+Saleem Effects damn, thats very observant of you

Still not fixed. Wtf? I'm writing from 2017 damn it.

Saleem Effects the game uses real time wind effects so sometimes its blows more than other times

+Gamesworld That's *upscaled* port. lol

+Icaraeus what a shit port

***** I wasn't talking about resolution, *idiot*

+SupaFreekFizeek what were you talking about then

The Large Channel Actual graphical assets, such as occlusion, alpha coverage, antriscopic filtering etc.

A year ago your comment mate, I miss the 3d games as well, I have one of the 4k HDR10/Dolby Vision Panasonic TV sets that do 3D with active glasses and I never understood why it never took off in gaming as it was ultra immersive, I remember this, Gears ⚙ 3, Batman AC, in Gears I remember being able to judge exactly how far to throw the grenade, shame it never took off, I suppose VR will be the next level now its becoming 4k with eye tracking etc, hope you are enjoying this gen mate.

Never had that issue myself, having played it recently.

It’s not just the scarf

Yeah I miss killzone 2 and 3 especially the multiplayer

Only those who preordered get the gold weapons and skins.

Reon Tomasu 60fps

+GhostyAssassine Nah PS2.

sorry ganz vergessen die ganze playstation rheie außer xbox :D

Every PlayStation is the best consoles

Hi im the random casual.. pause the video so your opinion is not altered by the performance since we talk about visuals 0:49 1:21 7:12 7:47 7:34 7:25 if you see any difference except for post proccesing ill sit down and let you buttfuck me...Most of the time this dude sais things that are hard to notice and when you play the game you dont notice them at all..A remaster doesnt have to look slightly better.It needs to look like next generation graphics and in this case it doesnt..Sorry but this is the case..If you cant see it your utter love for the franchise is blinding you..I love uncharted too!But the remaster was shit

NarpsHD Im not an uncharted fanboy this was my first time playing it so i had no problems with it, plus its not like uncharted 3 looks all that bad anyway. And its not like these guys were paid to make all new graphical effects and assets for the entire game.

+JaG Well if its a remaster it means that textures,effects(like fire or water),AA,Shadow quality,Post proccesing have to be tweeked.So that means that they were paid for that exact thing.Half the textures are tweeked,Effects look litterally the same,AA looks better...i guess,Post procesing has improved but post procesing is anoying to the core and we all disable it,And shadow quality looks sharp.So will i pay 50 bucks for some unfinished textures and shadows improovments..no i think ill go play it on an emulator and do the exact same thing..For free.

NarpsHD oh yeah which emulator runs this shit perfectly at 60fps no input lag, no sound stuttering, no screen tearing, no texture glitches or missing artifacts, cause i would love to test that shit out on my pc.

+JaG You avoided my comment completely and awnsered to one sentence.It doesnt depend on the emulator since there are only 2 working.And i dont know about all the downsides since i havent tested them out.But judjing from ps1 and ps2 emulators i have they run just fine and i suppose this will run two.Ive played all old school games on emulators from mario galaxy to shadow of the collosus with high resolution and 8k texture packs.And i dont know i suppose that if ps3 emulators dont work now give it 2 years and this shit will be popin 4k 60fps 8k textures no prob

Right. Shadows,textures and all kind of bulshit

+Phill Drake Textures are probably not going to be changed.

TheWitchking123 nope, ps4 pro is a 30fps machine lol

+Zain844 no. This is much better.

+Zain844 it's on PC

Indeed.

***** it's still on PlayStation #HoweverPCIsBetter

+Icaraeus Infamous is even better than ryse graphically

+EARTH-SOUL-88726 I skipped the PS3 too.

#Consoleproblems

+PC MASTER RACE EDUCATION PROJECT PC sucks because it have better graphics than consols, bad graphics are great and oldschool and 30fps with drops gives you a amazing cinematic feeling.

+PC MASTER RACE EDUCATION PROJECT BOOOOORING

PEASANTSTATION 3 VS PEASANTSTATION 4 VS SHIT . WHO WILL WIN?? SPOILERS: SHIT

+PC MASTER RACE EDUCATION PROJECT stupid PC master race vs stupid PC master race, who will win? Everybody obviously, since everyone gets to see how lame this so-called "master race" is. Lol~

said literally no one ever

And resolution

It is, plus your eye can only see up to 30fps

nice bait

i really hope that you just kidding XD just look at this video. turn the resolution to 1080p 60fps or 720 60fps then change it to 480p and look at it. before thinking that im a pcmr idiot i just wanted to tell you that im not.

***** You are fucking stupid bro.Past 15 fps the image seems to be moving.Below 15 it looks like a slideshow.This is caused because the brain is not fooled below 15 fps and can procces and say its a changing image.Above 15 Fps the brain is fooled and it interpurts it as movement.Remember the little books that you flip fast and the drawings seem to be moving?This is why they fuckin work.If you get one of those books and one has a drawn movement with 100 papers and the other has the same mpovement with 200 papers.One simply looks more detailed and smoother.The bigger the number the smoother the movement seems.Your tv works the same way

+SwaggyYolonator i didnt reply to the comment i replied to a dumbass that beilived it

I'd say 2 is best. Followed by 1. 3 is The worst.

+jpchevron I second that the second is not the second nor third, but the first - the best.

+JippaLippa 2 is the best one. All 3 are some of the best games ever. I guess for me it's the story of no. 2 that makes it the best for me.

***** the story of the second is indeed better! But i like the 3rd game's locations more. I also prefer Uncharted 3 final part more than the 2nd game one.

+jpchevron how is 3 the worst? Gooooooooooood Drake's fortune is the worst, like, really? Spanish dude's turn into monster's by an cursed tresuere? A CURSED TRESUERE!?! I mean i goddamn love the uncharted game's, but, you gotta admit, the story of uncharted 1 SUCKED

Yes! I've never played the uncharted series before so this remaster is perfect! It looks incredible and I've only heard very good things about Uncharted so I'm very excited! It should set me up for the release of Uncharted 4 which looks amazing too!

?

+try hard fan Dunno. Personally I find some things to look better on PS3, like the red glow from fires and Drake in the desert and with these games emphasising the cinematography so much it does kinda matter. Love the improved framerate and aiming though.

Linkenski Yeah. I don't know what I was thinking when I put up that comment. I ended up being against the remaster personally since I already beat all 3 games on PS3. But the increased framerate and improved visuals tempted me.

try hard fan I just replayed Drake's Fortune and Drake's Deception on my PS3 last weekend and it just got me in the Uncharted mood, so I picked up the Nathan Drake collection for PS4 (cuz my PS3 is not in my apartment :P) and currently I'm enjoying the shit out of it again. I still think the "definitive" version is the PS3 version of Uncharted 1 and 2, but 3 might be debtatable. The bad antialiasing in UC3 is very obvious on PS3.

Its a ps3 game...this is half a game it used to be for full price!. Lol. Its a shame that no one gives a fuck about it. No one will boast about these poor sales numbers.

+davey - bgames (dave) Lol poor sales numbers

+davey - bgames (dave) Lol, "Low sells numbers". You make me laugh, this game has more sells then Xbox console so stfu kid.

God Of War kid? Im probably twice your age.

davey - bgames i was just kidding.... How old are you? 0.o

Nah the textures were updated.But Most of the work was done on one and 2.. 3 Only needed its shadows and AA fixed!

***** Amazing ports include the multiplayer.

***** 60 fps and higher res textures are standard in PC ports. So what makes this an "amazing" port?

***** Do elaborate.

+Floydthefuckbag listen, nobody gave a shit about the multiplayer. Ok? Well maybe a few people. The vast majority of people bought these games for the single player campaign. They had limited time to work on 3 games. It's unreasonable to expect them to also work on a multiplayer mode. Multiplayer is very hard to implement in a game. You need to have a solidly engineered network for multiplayer. Look at how the Halo collection suffered from bad multiplayer. That's because they needed to work on like 4 games at once. It took them about 6 months to get the multiplayer working right. And they only did that because most people wanted to play those Halo games for the multiplayer. Most people don't want to play Uncharted for the multiplayer. So why go through the hassle of setting up a network for maybe 10% of people buying the games? That would not be worth the cost to implement multiplayer. Stop being a douche just because it doesn't have multiplayer. You probably wouldn't have played it anyways. It's an amazing port because Uncharted DF is almost unplayable on PS3 because it's so old. The graphics aren't there anymore. These look amazing. 1080p textures at 60 fps is well worth my $60 and they actually did more than that. If you watched the video, they fixed the sluggish aiming and input lag of the games.