he escaped the show at one point into reality

It explains why he does so well in tournaments. It’s definitely on the level of “what a Japanese person trying to come up with a Southern American sounding name” would write. Just look at Guilty Gear’s “Goldlewis Dickinson” as an example LOL Or Pegasus J. Crawford (Japanese name for Pegasus) or Keith “Bandit Keith” Howard. 100% this man escaped the manga and came straight here to take our prize money.

On stream, He said he was gonna do that 😂😂😂 other pros on for other decks as well.

Do you mean Koty?

Omg this is so good i laughed so hard at this haha

@@Musical_Nero nah kody, a different player that was saying plasma can't equip tokens

@@Musical_Nero who tf is Koty? 😂

This needs more likes

I dont think theres a question that will stump him..

Yeah kinda surprised. Like, most TD players probably have encountered this situation many times before. But hey, it is what it is. Doug missed the "except in damage step" on multifaker. Similar haha moment

@@shen.daniel hahaha yeah I think dougs was a tad worse

It was more of a misunderstanding of thunder dragon fusion's restriction on his part. In the vid, he even says before he answers that he understands how it could be (and actually is) ruled, so he knew about how Verte's effect becomes the fusion spell's effect as opposed to just activating the spell itself. He just guessed that the restriction from TDF was a blanket OPT that applied to every instance of the effect, regardless of what card applies it, and not just its own effect, which is silly, because Konami could print a card with the exact same effect, but different name, and you obviously wouldn't be locked out of using one over the other in the same turn.

I know I got that one

Coder, get this man on for Yang Zing.

Well it's a good thing I didn't bet with chat and go for a 7+ haha. Good job from Jesse though! Those were a bunch of tricky questions! I got 6.5/8 (got tripped up in the same places he did, minus the Verte one. I have been made painfully aware of how Verte works) Great video, I love this series! Would love to see some names like MBT, Cimo, and Farfa on (though I hear Cimo is hard to get a hold of haha)! Awesome work, Coder! Also, side note, congratulations on the subathon! I couldn't join in the fun and watch because I just started a new college semester last week but I heard it went great! I just found this channel a couple weeks ago and I'm loving it so far so I hope to watch some live ones in the future!

If you were wondering, the track is called Mausoleum Mash from Crypt of the Necrodancer

Yes PLEASE

Wtf

What deck dkeyed knows the most just being curious

@@kechitiabderrahmane6357 don't know for sure but most probably its Ninjas

No...

@@hivestalker Lol I'm only responding to the people that are saying these are wayyy harder than before. They weren't imo. Some were definitely tough but I would've expected Jesse to get them all or maybe only miss 1-2

Nah they weren't at all. Only 2 of of them were very obscure/difficult and even then you could figure it out if you have a general judge level knowledge and just read all the cards.

@@Boristien405 Yes, they were. Everyone else got questions like d.d crow vs benten. The only "easy" question Jesse got was the Verte one.

oh and the 1st question was easy too

@@Musical_Nero Nah they weren't that hard, except the number 95, the snd part of the question was kinda hard

@@justkuro6286 bois yall need to shut up and read what I'm saying. THEY WERE HARDER THAN "EVERYONE ELSES." That is a fact. I personally got all of them right except for the Trishula one. I'm just saying compared to everyone elses they were brutal. Damn.

I think the difference here is that, with Chaos Space, it's an activation cost. In that case, the properties of the card paid as cost are "stored" in the state of Chaos Space, and "that card" is actually referring to that stored card. However, with Valkyria, it's actually in the effect itself. Thus, it has no internal state regarding the sent card, and therefore "that card" relies on an external game state, namely, the card in the GY. I could just be talking out of my butt, though, because I'm not experienced with YGO.

Chaos space and valkyria do not have the same text valkyria uses a comma while chaos space is a semicolon For valkyria part A must resolve correctly for part B to apply so if the sent card never hits gy part A fails to resolve so the restriction is not applied Chaos space sends a card to gy for cost. The effect of chaos space never checks the location of the sent card funny enough even if opponent would use smthn like transmigration prophecy chaos space still remembers the attribute sent and resolves

@@mattr791 I believe you need to re read both cards. 1) The same text I'm referring to is "that card" and "that monster". 2) The checking for both cards according to their text happens at resolution. 3) Valkyria has "but" not ",and if you do,". Is "but" equal to that or "also"? I believe the later. About Chaos Space remembering what cost it used I'm perfectly ok with, just like with Levianeer. Still about Valkyria there is nothing that binds the card with the gy, unless a specific ruling exist for these situations. For reference please look at both Salamangreat Sunlight Wolf and Shooting Riser Dragon.

@@babrad perhaps it's because it needs somewhere else to look? In the case of it being an activation cost, the properties of the card being used are remembered, and that's what's used as a comparison. In contrast, the only thing Valkyria remembers is a pointer to the card. However, this pointer's location is tied to the GY because Valkyria's card effect says "send... from your Deck to the GY." Edit: Even if Valkyria's effect end up banishing it, the implicit pointer construction to the top of the GY is not altered by Macro Cosmos.) I'm probably not using proper YGO terminology, since I'm thinking about the game basically as a stateful computer.

Here is my knowledge/thinking: For your question: YES :) If the effect includes the word "Send": "Send" is specifically defined as "an act of moving cards to the GY" (with the exception of moving from Banished to GY, in which case they are "Returned", and never considered "Sent") Chaos Valkyrie won't perform a "You cannot..." check, since it's Optional Effect was not satisfied in the example, while Macro Cosmos is in effect. For your [2] point, the wording is not the exact same. The fact that Chaos Space Sends a card as "cost" is important, because you cannot negate an activation "cost". In the video scenario, The cost is paid: "1 LIGHT or DARK monster is sent to GY", THEN Crow is chained. But the effect is allowed, because cost is already paid, Chaos space doesn't activate in the GY, and Crow doesn't negate activations or effects. (!!HOWEVER... I think this would be different if, say, Macro Cosmos was on the field prior to activating Chaos Space, which will NOT be able to activate at ALL due to being unable to pay its activation cost. Maybe a more technically-minded person would verify that for me?)

I did guess it right, but only because I've watched the entire series and this is the third time coder has used a card effect with a location specific restriction, and therefor if I didn't know it I would actually be a moron.

@@AngelNearDestruction ok but that seems worded like it’s not location specific so not moronic to think the other way

@@AngelNearDestruction where do you see a location specific restriction on Chaos Valkyria? I hope the other 2 cases are NOT sunlight wolf and Shooting Riser Dragon.

@@gregoryford2532 this game, man… 😅

And now I have found you, my friend

@@sdquad6 AYE QUAD, MY BOI

Yes I'm 99% sure you can copy it multiple time, copying effects does not copy restrictions such as "you can only use this effect once per turn". Same reason as why Verte doesn't copy the restriction "You cannot Normal or Special Summon other monsters the turn you activate this card" when copying the effect of Red Eyes Fusion. Guess this could come into play if you summoned multiple copies of Phantom of Chaos with multiple copies of the same monster in the GY, or when Starving Venom was legal.

Foolish can resolve. The sent monster simply gets banished. Cards like Effect Veiler however, where sending the card is a cost, cannot resolve.

yes u r able to reborn the said element saber.

This would be my take on it. lmk if this makes sense to you (edit: or not lol): Chas space says: 'add 1 LIGHT or DARK monster that cannot be Normal Summoned/Set from your Deck to your hand, with a Level from 4 to 8, and with a different Attribute than that monster. " and does not say: "add 1 LIGHT or DARK monster that cannot be Normal Summoned/Set from your Deck to your hand, with a Level from 4 to 8, and with a different Attribute than that monster ***IN THE GRAVEYARD***" The reasoning stated by Coder is that the resolution doesn't check if it is in the graveyard - only that it was a LIGHT monster