No video

Do the 16in Gun Turrets Still Rotate?

  Рет қаралды 264,643

Battleship New Jersey

Battleship New Jersey

Күн бұрын

When this ship was decommissioned there was work planned to weld the turrets in place so that they could no longer be rotated, today we are hunting for those weld marks.
For the article describing that welding:
drive.google.c...
To support this channel and the museum, got to.
www.battleshipnewjersey.org/videofund
For additional resources, go to:
maritime.org/d...
maritime.org/doc

Пікірлер: 1 200
@israelbarker1389
@israelbarker1389 3 жыл бұрын
I'm honestly just here to see how small a space Ryan can fit in
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
We're always looking for more ridiculous places to squeeze him into!
@wheels-n-tires1846
@wheels-n-tires1846 3 жыл бұрын
I think the gun barrel might be it!!!
@mikeh.8912
@mikeh.8912 3 жыл бұрын
@@wheels-n-tires1846 He's already done that!
@chrisb9960
@chrisb9960 3 жыл бұрын
@@mikeh.8912 Saw that video. I think he lost a bet on that one.
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
He begged us to do it. I dont know why. -Libby the editor
@SEscarlett
@SEscarlett 3 жыл бұрын
ANSWER: Yes, as far as we know, the 16in Gun Turrets can rotate. (but the electrical system probably lacks to power to energize the motors to do so) No weld marks have been found to indicate otherwise.
@jfbeam
@jfbeam 3 жыл бұрын
"as far as we know"... they'd only have to weld one spot. (or motor) Yes, it would be nice to see many of these things operating again, but it's just not in the cards. (and firing it where it sits is not really an option. not even a single bare powder charge. a full load plus shell would likely damage the aging beast.)
@invadegreece9281
@invadegreece9281 3 жыл бұрын
Come on USA, scrounge up some of those taxpayer dollars I know you have and get these ships powered
@TheUsmc0802
@TheUsmc0802 3 жыл бұрын
@@jfbeam The power is right, with our ship power, ie steam and diesel generators there isn’t any power to move them. Structurally you are wrong. The ships are sound and good still be put into service I’d needed/wanted.
@JarrodFrates
@JarrodFrates 3 жыл бұрын
@@TheUsmc0802 Estimates to restore them to service over a decade ago were in the neighborhood of a billion dollars each, but their combat effectiveness would be limited. Their main guns reach only about 20 miles, and while they carried Tomahawks for longer range, there are more efficient and less expensive cruise missile platforms out there. They carried a maximum of 32 missiles, while an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer usually carries 56 but can carry more. The Future Surface Combatant may carry even more, since some of the anti-aircraft duties currently assigned to SM-series missiles may be taken over by lasers. The truth is that the Iowas were obsolete before they were launched. The Iowa launched on 27 Aug 1942, almost three months after the Battle of Midway, the turning point in the Pacific that was fought entirely by aircraft. While there would still be major surface engagements with guns, aircraft were the overriding factor the rest of the war, and have been in the almost 80 years since Midway. It's possible that there will be future surface engagements with guns, but they will be by far the exception and are unlikely to have any real effect on the outcome of whatever conflict led to them.
@termitreter6545
@termitreter6545 3 жыл бұрын
@@JarrodFrates Yup. Battleships are, ironically enough, very specialized vessels. Their main goal is to have a combination of armor and gun range to outrage the enemy. So you can penetrate their armor at X range, while the opponent cant. Considering missiles have become the main weapon of choice, there is no reason to carry all those guns and armor. A BB is so expensive youre prolly not even saving money using guns instead of expensive missiles for bombardment. And if you ever wanna kill something heavily armored/with tons of CIWS, youd use super/hypersonic missiles. IIRC the Iowas were actually developed with the mindset that BBs werent the main combatants anymore, and more about protection of aircraft carriers. Their belt armor was actually weaker than the earlier class of battleships, and significantly weaker than those of british KG-5s and the two Bismarcks. They were quite fast though, and very heavily armed.
@MarvelousWhales
@MarvelousWhales 3 жыл бұрын
Another shoutout to Libby who not only has to squeeze into the small spaces with Ryan but also squeeze into the spaces with Camera equipment! Respect
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@ghost307
@ghost307 3 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Women rarely get the respect that they deserve. Keep in mind that although Fred Astaire was a fantastic dancer Ginger Rogers matched him step for step...backwards...wearing heels.
@Spookieham
@Spookieham 3 жыл бұрын
I was just thinking - who is holding the. Camera in that tiny space??? Poor Libby!
@SuperAWaC
@SuperAWaC 3 жыл бұрын
@@ghost307 mate relax lmao
@ghost307
@ghost307 3 жыл бұрын
@@SuperAWaC Sorry, but she does a great job at what she does and it annoys me to no end when someone does their best and is then criticized for not being perfect. Keep in mind that there has been only 1 person who was 'perfect' and they ended up nailing Him to a cross.
@nekomakhea9440
@nekomakhea9440 3 жыл бұрын
"...today we are hunting for those weld marks." *revs angle grinder*
@F4Wildcat
@F4Wildcat 3 жыл бұрын
"grind and shave.....untill it is DONE"
@lightningwingdragon973
@lightningwingdragon973 3 жыл бұрын
Neeeeerrrrrrrroooooowwwwwmmmmm
@streetracer2321
@streetracer2321 2 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@HPD1171
@HPD1171 Жыл бұрын
@@F4Wildcat a grinder and paint make me the welder I ain't.
@williestyle35
@williestyle35 3 ай бұрын
Turns out the "turret travel lock" is what is welded in place to keep the turrets from rotating. And since they can't "modify" the _New Jersey_ it will be staying immobile. If you want to see a turret rotating, check out the _U S S Iowa_ museum.
@zacheryloop1947
@zacheryloop1947 3 жыл бұрын
But but but.... The movie Battleship shows us that we can still fight against alien invaders with Museum ships anytime we need too! 😂
@jasondiaz8431
@jasondiaz8431 3 жыл бұрын
That movie should be relegated to the waste bin along with Pearl Harbor.
@MichaelRichardson-bw5xh
@MichaelRichardson-bw5xh 3 жыл бұрын
Yep, just need a couple of dozen septuagenarians and you got yourself a functioning battleship!
@ELCADAROSA
@ELCADAROSA 3 жыл бұрын
Worst. Movie. Ever!
@DougDreamCatcher
@DougDreamCatcher 3 жыл бұрын
@@ELCADAROSALiam Neeson played an admiral in it. He must have needed to pay some bills or something to accept a role in a movie that bad,...
@JustSomeCanuck
@JustSomeCanuck 3 жыл бұрын
@@DougDreamCatcher I have a feeling he felt the same way after The Phantom Menace. Actors do have to eat.
@hermanhahn3382
@hermanhahn3382 2 жыл бұрын
The best videos are the “let’s see where this door goes” or “let’s see the weird places we can make Ryan squeeze into”. Absolutely fantastic!
@alexdeglavina1412
@alexdeglavina1412 3 жыл бұрын
Back in 06 a group of us led by Marty, raised the guns on turret 1 and 2 by hand. We discussed if it were possible to activate the machinery, but it would have involved reconnecting the power, and it was doubtful shore power would have been sufficient. Not only that but I bet it would have caused a big concern from the Navy LOL
@ClarkPerks
@ClarkPerks 3 жыл бұрын
Alex - Do you know why the guns were not raised on Turret 3?
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
Clark, They are lowered to the point where they would be to load the guns, so the loading is tray is down and the breach is open.
@ClarkPerks
@ClarkPerks 3 жыл бұрын
Battleship New Jersey - Another question I have heard asked a lot but have never heard an answer!
@bl4533
@bl4533 3 жыл бұрын
That would actually be funny! They'd panic seeing those bad boys moving? 🤣🤣
@arbysandtehchief5494
@arbysandtehchief5494 3 жыл бұрын
@@bl4533 People tend to do that when 3x16inch guns start getting pointed at things.
@aaronp3411
@aaronp3411 3 жыл бұрын
I love the nuts and bolts videos like this. It’s one thing to read about, study, and look at pictures of the ships. But an entirely different thing to actually see inner workings.
@JheregJAB
@JheregJAB 3 жыл бұрын
Since the bearing rollers are all packed in grease, I would expect any welding to be done in the gearset someplace. If I were going to try to disable a turret I'd probably do it in a place that was fairly easy to access, and not covered in potentially flammable grease. There must be a gearbox somewhere where the motors / drive gear interfaces with the turret and that would be where I would look. Alternatively I suppose some simple bar stock welded across a gap would do the job, though I'd imagine that would be even more obvious. Man, wouldn't it be cool to move those things, just to prove someone was wrong? Super cool stuff.
@Badger_325
@Badger_325 3 жыл бұрын
Im so glad this showed up in my recommended. My great grandfather was actually in the shipyard helping put in the 16 inch turrets on the USS New Jersey and im glad that something he helped put together is still around.
@invadegreece9281
@invadegreece9281 3 жыл бұрын
Oh wow, that’s cool
@rogerbolinger2508
@rogerbolinger2508 3 жыл бұрын
Had to comment on this one after seeing the man again go into the very fibers of the ship to show things that few have seen. Thank you sir, your dedication to your work is inspiring and you are sharing a wealth of knowledge.
@robertf3479
@robertf3479 3 жыл бұрын
I'll second that.
@martinbeirne7621
@martinbeirne7621 3 жыл бұрын
Third
@adamlubkowski1107
@adamlubkowski1107 3 жыл бұрын
+1
@suspiciousminds1750
@suspiciousminds1750 3 жыл бұрын
Truly fantastic video! I half expected the video to be short: "Do the 16in Gun Turrets Still Rotate?" "No." end of video. Seriously, I am not surprised, but always amazed at how complex these 80 yr old vessels are.
@loosh5101
@loosh5101 3 жыл бұрын
Article: The turrets were welded so they can't traverse. Ryan: I'm standing next to Turret 2's gunhouse with 500 volunteers, a really big pulley, and a lot of rope. .Let's see if we can turn this thing and scare the crap out of Philly.
@wrench41m21
@wrench41m21 3 жыл бұрын
I'm so watching that on PPV
@dundonrl
@dundonrl 3 жыл бұрын
Screw that.. bring some generators and we'll move it the way it should be with power!
@logantc.1353
@logantc.1353 3 жыл бұрын
@@dundonrl I would think making the drives move would take a incredible amount of power, if I had to choose a way to move the turrets I'd see if its possible to bar over the drives with small hydraulic cylinders. It could take days to move 90 degrees but if it needed done with the least energy consumption thats where I would put my first bet.
@Meekerextreme
@Meekerextreme 3 жыл бұрын
Why would it scare anyone? No ammo onboard.
@adstaton8461
@adstaton8461 3 жыл бұрын
@@Meekerextreme if you have ever had a weapon pointed at you, perfect knowledge that it is unloaded doesn't take the edge off.
@andrewburnett4931
@andrewburnett4931 3 жыл бұрын
I've always loved the story that the radio telescope at Jodrel Bank uses hydraulic motors from Revenge class battleships because they could point things so accurately.
@deloreandmc9600
@deloreandmc9600 3 жыл бұрын
The grease stops the rubber rotting it acts like a feed for the rubber :)
@witeshade
@witeshade 3 жыл бұрын
That's pretty amazing to see the "big dumb metal" parts that let something that huge operate. Yeah seeing all the awesome computers and targeting systems, control panels, engines, etc is also extremely fascinating, but it's cool to see those parts where it's just a giant sturdy piece of metal that's capable of both supporting an astronomical amount of weight but also allow it to move with the precision required to hit a target 20+ miles away.
@RealJohnnyDingo
@RealJohnnyDingo 3 жыл бұрын
No digital computers, control systems, or sensors like we think of today either.
@brianhiles8164
@brianhiles8164 3 жыл бұрын
Half of Camden is hoping you find those welds; the other half is afraid you´ll hold Camden hostage if you should succeed.
@invadegreece9281
@invadegreece9281 3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@GrasshopperKelly
@GrasshopperKelly 3 жыл бұрын
3:20 Yes, the hold down clips *are* intended to hold the weight of the turret (proven by Mike Getscher and Ed Najjarine). That's not to say they would do so for long (Eg. Prinz Eugen's retaining clips have slowly failed under the test of time and salt water) or that they 100% *will* it's not been tested, nor do we have a capsized Iowa class that retained its turrets in place to answer that Question. Either way, the clips on most ships, tend to be engineered to be able to hold the weight of the whole turret basket. The few exceptions being Yamato's failed potentially due to the concussive damage she took before capsizing. Tirpitz turret clips were stretched during the damage from Operation Source. #4 Dora was pushed over, off their rollers, breaking the lips on the upper sets of rollers, and many of the planetary gear's teeth were partially flattened or broken off upon crashing through the worm drive and against other local structures, so despite the other gears and rotation equipment either being repaired, or replaced. Dora was never fully operational again according to Alfred Eichler (Chief Engineer aboard Tirpitz) and her log books (Tomas Gallagher's research) 3:48 Tomas Gallagher did find evidence in Tirpitz's notes and from first hand accounts, Bismarck would have had retaining clips. Whether they were as strong, or designed like Tirpitz's to aid in her water tightness, after the experiences of Scharnhorst and Gneisenau taking on hundreds of tons of water at top speeds, is not clear, there is *very* little evidence, and original drawings of Bismarck are as rare as rocking horse poop. Plus, unlike Gallagher, we no longer have access to such fantastic resources like Captain Hans Meyer. Unlike Iowa, who has dozens of old drawings archived, and even her turrets operating manual has the hold down clips labelled. The clips aren't designed to withstand the magazine brewing, but engineering them for the weight of the turret, was the most commonly picked desideratum across various national naval engineering schools. There's just as many examples of turrets falling out of place, as there are of turrets remaining fastened during a capsize, and for varying turret weights, all to way up to the largest Battleship turrets. On another note... She looks as well kept as a sterile clean room for pharmaceutical packaging xD
@mpking828
@mpking828 3 жыл бұрын
I think this is the video you are referencing: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/grCWeq2BsarbcX0.html
@GrasshopperKelly
@GrasshopperKelly 3 жыл бұрын
@@mpking828 I'm very lucky enough to have seen him making that lecture(?)(speech?) Although thanks for the link! Didn't know it was ever recorded.
@waynemayo1661
@waynemayo1661 3 жыл бұрын
I love these videos of rarely seen, virtually inaccessible and impossible for public access places on the ship. They add tremendously to my appreciation of the technology and what WWII sailors had to do to perform their duties. Keep up the good work!
@gfinnstrom
@gfinnstrom 3 жыл бұрын
My father served on this great ship in WW 2 he is also on the taps roll call
@pauld6967
@pauld6967 3 жыл бұрын
I agree with hal james: thank you for doing this. My supposition is that the plunger pin you showed us may have some shock absorber value but I think it's true purpose is to possibly open an electrical circuit or close one to send an interrupt signal. Either way, the resulting function would be to stop the motor(s) driving the rotation in the event the human in the loop wasn't paying attention.
@fire304
@fire304 3 жыл бұрын
I don't have first have knowledge of this system on the NJ, but based on the way the military usually thinks I would say the is an actual switch that is tripped before the stop hits. The bumper is there in case the turret over rotates. You'll notice the fixed bumper had a think coat of paint on it, if it has contact regularly the would be signs of that contact.
@timberwolf1575
@timberwolf1575 3 жыл бұрын
@@fire304 I would be willing to bet the number of times the turret even rotated close to that far is pretty low. It's not a common angle of attack to use tactically outside of World of Warships. In WWII, she would have rarely engaged in fire that wasn't straight ahead to directly abeam. Shore bombardment was pretty much straight broadside work, and that probably accounts for the utter majority of times the turrets were even rotated off of center. Training likely accounts for the rest. While I can see a training evolution running the turret to the "limit", I bet an officer had his finger on the abort switch the whole time. So having intact paint would hardly be determinative.
@Spartan101st
@Spartan101st 3 жыл бұрын
@@timberwolf1575 are you telling me that they didn't shoot over the shoulder like that to kite from the enemy in real life? All the while the enemy is taking the cap. I thought the game was 100% realistic. LOL (Sarcasm)
@fire304
@fire304 3 жыл бұрын
@@timberwolf1575 I agree. In fact, if I understand naval doctrine at the time was to engage bow on to minimize your silhouette and maximize the angle of the armor belt. Firing to the rear was only done while running away from a superior force, which in the days of the decisive fleet engagement theory should never happen to a capital ship. Hence only forward battery ships like Nelson and Strasbourg, they were never going to run so no sense in having rearward firing batteries. There's also a danger of firing over the shoulder in that the superstructure of the ship is directly exposed to the blast of the muzzle. If you watch the intro to Dracinifel's videos (which if you watch this video you should watch his channel too) there's a video of a broadside firing and you see a bunch of debris go flying from the concussion. Imagine being in the enclosed bridge and having that shockwave hit you. Your liver would turn to jelly...
@SeanBZA
@SeanBZA 3 жыл бұрын
@@fire304 You can see the actual stop on the ship structure has a replaceable part where the hydraulic pin can hit. Likely the pin operates a grease filled chamber that vents the grease through an orifice to limit shock, but there probably is a electrical limit switch in the turret director encoder that first will stop electrical rotation 2 degrees before, then the shock absorber is there for in case damage has meant the turret is turning under direct manual control as fallback. That structure is there as final stop, in case of a control system runaway that slews at full speed traverse, where it is likely the limit switch operation will still result in hundreds of tons of metal having to stop without damaging said hundreds of tons too much. Probably only has been tested twice, both times deliberately, during acceptance trials and during refurbishment, the rest of the time being a safety system only inspected and never used. One stop per side, and likely in the ships stores there is only 2 spare end caps, and a single plunger.
@johndunn678
@johndunn678 3 жыл бұрын
Not being claustrophobic is definitely a requirement in your job Ryan. Wow, some good shot of the inner workings of the turrets.
@joeythedime1838
@joeythedime1838 Жыл бұрын
Ryan needs to discuss the USS Iowa rotating turret #3.
@sb859
@sb859 3 жыл бұрын
The engineering of these machines astonishes me. All pre-computer, pre-calculator!
@elultimo102
@elultimo102 2 жыл бұрын
The IOWA was used in the Gulf War---The mechanical aiming computer is still so accurate, that it was determined there was no need to replace it. (People were pretty damn smart back then, and had to be, without electronics and tech to do all their thinking for them).
@EricTViking
@EricTViking 3 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate the energy and enthusiasm you put into making these videos - thanks and keep up the great work 👍
@neilegan5088
@neilegan5088 3 жыл бұрын
Where to start? All my life I've been fascinated by big gun warships, ever since I read Ludovic Kennedy's book "Pursuit, the sinking of the Bismark" when I was about 14. Now thanks to Ryan and You Tube I am getting the answers to all the questions I've had over the years about these magnificent vessels. Every single video, without fail, is fascinating and a real pleasure to watch. Thank you so much.
@walterkreitmeier5079
@walterkreitmeier5079 2 жыл бұрын
This is an absolut amazing view in a area normal visiters would never discouver. Many thanks for showing us this very rar details of a Turret we would never know without you. Best regards from Germany.
@ralphjacobson8815
@ralphjacobson8815 2 жыл бұрын
I've been inside several tanks on display outside armories and VFW halls over the years and can tell you that the manual traverse mechanisms have still been operable in all of them. Elevation was not possible in any of the vehicles I've been in, because there's usually a steel bar welded to the breach, keeping the gun in place.
@alonespirit9923
@alonespirit9923 2 жыл бұрын
In 1980s at the Georgia Veterans Memorial State Park in I think it was Cordele, there was an M4A3E8 at interior end of park entrance road (park displays were rearranged at some point between then and now) and it had bottom escape hatch gone. Lots of people had crawled under and gotten inside, some of the shell racks were full of soda cans. We discovered the turret was not rotatable but the manual elevation was operable, and worked smooth and easily. Park entrance road was on rolling ground and we would follow cars up and down the grade. All the periscopes were gone and even through their small openings in top of tank enough light came in to be able to see well in the white painted interior. I remember a number of roadwheel tires had Firestone company name molded in to their rubber rims.
@jamestheotherone742
@jamestheotherone742 3 жыл бұрын
We watch this channel to see what dingy crevice of the New Jersey he's wedged himself into this time. :+)
@Vile-Flesh
@Vile-Flesh 3 жыл бұрын
This vid is awesome! More like this please! Holy Christ that looks like a tight squeeze to get through to get into that pitch black space.
@fredkeele6578
@fredkeele6578 3 жыл бұрын
My two brothers and I toured the USS Alabama last fall. It was truly amazing how much space for the crew, as well as the total firepower these battleships had.
@NJintheImagination
@NJintheImagination 3 жыл бұрын
How many museum curator jobs have the requirement that you cannot be claustrophobic? Really admire this guy’s commitment. I was feeling claustrophobic just watching this.
@ClarkPerks
@ClarkPerks 3 жыл бұрын
Great to see this question finally answered since nobody involved with the museum has been able to show those rollers in the past 20 years. Like so many other stories, the “turret is welded so it won’t turn” appears to be another myth.
@milohdd
@milohdd 2 жыл бұрын
I suppose there's no need to weld it when the ship has no power to turn it anyways
@baghdaddymike6669
@baghdaddymike6669 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for these, Ryan, but please be careful with confined space entry. After decades, there is always a strong possibility of toxic or noxious gases.
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
You can't quite see it on the video, but the chasm underneath Ryan has giant openings out into the rest of the ship, this is a very well ventilated, though dark, space.
@vbscript2
@vbscript2 2 жыл бұрын
@@BattleshipNewJersey Good to know, though, as far as dangerous gases are concerned, it's important to have good ventilation both up and down. Some gases are heavier than air and sink, others are lighter and rise. There were at least one or two spaces at an Air Force base I used to work at where, even though they were completely open on top, people had died after climbing into without testing the air first.
@billpotokar360
@billpotokar360 Жыл бұрын
...yaa , ryqn just ate at taco bell...
@afenijmeijer9027
@afenijmeijer9027 2 жыл бұрын
These videos are great. I have always been a battleship fan and these videos have given so much more information you will ever see in books and other films and videos.
@philwalmsley1116
@philwalmsley1116 3 жыл бұрын
Ryan and team, well done and very interesting. Thanks for climbing through that tiny hole to film the video.
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Walms!
@Donboy517
@Donboy517 3 жыл бұрын
Need to come see the New Jersey, I've seen the Missouri in pearl harbor and it was amazing, almost got lost wandering around below decks.
@ScoutPL
@ScoutPL 3 жыл бұрын
I can imagine. I walked my legs off on the Queen Mary one time.
@johnfrank6112
@johnfrank6112 3 жыл бұрын
These are great how to video's from a bygone era. Ryan deserves a lot of credit for finding new ways to make lemonade during this pandemic challenged time plus Baraseal is right; How small can he go?
@ronsmith7739
@ronsmith7739 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your time and effort!!!
@nicbrownable
@nicbrownable 3 жыл бұрын
There is a sponsorship opportunity here for a laundry detergent manufacturer.
@matthewhall9530
@matthewhall9530 3 жыл бұрын
The turret retainers are one of those things where you’d definitely have bigger problems than the turrets falling out of the ship if they were able to.
@Bananaskin101
@Bananaskin101 3 жыл бұрын
Ryan, you need to be issued with overalls but keep up the great work and vids. It's really interesting to look at the nooks and crannies of a battleship 👍
@jpotter2086
@jpotter2086 2 жыл бұрын
Holy crap, that first shot .... nope, nope, nope, never going in that space LOL Hats off, sir!
@jamieknight326
@jamieknight326 3 жыл бұрын
This was great. Really informative. I’d love to see more of the machinery for how the turrets are rotated
@AdamSteidl
@AdamSteidl 3 жыл бұрын
Would love to see the mechanisms that do the rotating of the turret.
@johneyton5452
@johneyton5452 3 жыл бұрын
Now I'm wondering if the power for traverse and elevation comes from the steam plant or electric.
@AdamSteidl
@AdamSteidl 3 жыл бұрын
@@johneyton5452 Wondering the same thing.
@machintelligence
@machintelligence 3 жыл бұрын
@@johneyton5452 Possibly electric or hydraulic (or both, since you might want to have a backup system).
@haywoodyoudome
@haywoodyoudome 3 жыл бұрын
@@johneyton5452 All electric
@johneyton5452
@johneyton5452 3 жыл бұрын
@@haywoodyoudome makes sense. Does it have its own diesel generator or is it ultimately powered by the steam plant? I'd think they'd want to be able to keep firing even if the steam plant is hit.
@Semper_Iratus
@Semper_Iratus 3 жыл бұрын
thank you for all you do. I truly apricate all of your hard work and dedication.
@misha9423
@misha9423 2 жыл бұрын
I know for a fact at least three of Massachusetts' main guns were still capable of being elevated as of 45 some odd years ago. When I visited the ship with my dad in my pre-teens they had installed wooden steps on deck you could walk up and look down the bore, the barrel was back lit from the breech so you could see the rifling. I seem to recall it was turret #1, the barrels of that turret were horizontal at the time and all main guns are elevated now. I remember my dad bemoaning the possibility of rainwater getting inside and running down into the bilge and potential for subsequent corrosion.
@kevinv.m.94
@kevinv.m.94 2 жыл бұрын
I like this short but compact format of video.
@pscwplb
@pscwplb 3 жыл бұрын
Greasing those roller bearings looks like a job for the lowest ranked gunnery mate.
@finscreenname
@finscreenname 3 жыл бұрын
That was the guy that had to clean the head with his toothbrush...
@pscwplb
@pscwplb 3 жыл бұрын
@@finscreenname Nah, that's a punishment. Greasing the bearings is just a shit job that has to be done.
@CRAZYHORSE19682003
@CRAZYHORSE19682003 3 жыл бұрын
Probably not, PMS, Preventative Maintenance Schedule dictates when each piece of equipment is serviced. It is rarely done by someone under Petty Officer 3rd Class.
@bumblebeebob
@bumblebeebob 3 жыл бұрын
What was the frequency rate of greasing those bearings? 2 or 3 times a week? Once a week?
@CRAZYHORSE19682003
@CRAZYHORSE19682003 3 жыл бұрын
@@bumblebeebob It has been 31 years since I was a gunners mate on the USS Iowa so I honestly can't remember.
@rinislaboratories1315
@rinislaboratories1315 3 жыл бұрын
As this channel has gotten more popular he's getting quite good at presenting
@eve__________
@eve__________ 3 жыл бұрын
i love watching these videos and just going outside and seeing bb-62 in front of my eyes
@johnslowikowski8847
@johnslowikowski8847 3 жыл бұрын
Every time I go up and down 95 or cross the river on 676 I always look to see if the turrets have moved since last time I passed by the ship
@howitzer8946
@howitzer8946 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the info. Love the videos you provide! Yes I like this type videos.
@scottmyers6441
@scottmyers6441 3 жыл бұрын
The Zerk fittings all have caps on them, I don't even have those on a new warship.
@alwaysbearded1
@alwaysbearded1 3 жыл бұрын
They are not Zerk fittings. They look like the hp type used on RR connecting rods and other similar places like crawler tractors. Can't think of the name of the grease or the fitting at the moment. The grease used for RR use is solid at room temps.
@josephpadula2283
@josephpadula2283 3 жыл бұрын
Button head grease fittings.
@alwaysbearded1
@alwaysbearded1 3 жыл бұрын
@@josephpadula2283 Thank you. Thought it was something more sophisticated not descriptive but that's just what they look like.
@scottmyers6441
@scottmyers6441 3 жыл бұрын
Learned something new, thanks.
@SteamCrane
@SteamCrane 3 жыл бұрын
@@josephpadula2283 Correct. The grease gun locks around the button, so it can't pop off the way Zerks frequently do. Allows higher grease pressure.
@wmsollenberger8706
@wmsollenberger8706 2 жыл бұрын
AllI can say is, THANK YOU! History worth saving!
@deaks25
@deaks25 3 жыл бұрын
This sort of thing is why museum ships are so important. We can pour over plans all we like, but people can never climb around the gubbings once the ship is gone. I know USS New Jersey has been out of commission for a relatively short time, but the rollers look in great condition with plenty of grease. I imagine the reason the turrets don't turn is drive machinery related, ie the motors are either disconnected, out of service or removed. And I can imagine there would be a few worried faces if New Jersey just started swinging her turrets around. I'm sure being a museum ship isn't the most exciting thing for her given her career, but she is a mature girl now and so has to behave.
@davewhiting3296
@davewhiting3296 Жыл бұрын
Folks watching this video may want to checkout the video turret #3 of the USS Iowa rotating in June 2023.
@08impalaSS25
@08impalaSS25 3 жыл бұрын
Ryan you should look at the other turrets to see if they were welded. These kind of videos fascinate me great job
@williestyle35
@williestyle35 3 ай бұрын
For anyone interested, Ryan did eventually "solve" the riddle of why _U S S New Jersey_ can not rotate her turrets (hint : it is as simple as you might guess). To see a 16 inch turret rotating go to _U S S Iowa_ Museum and Memorial. 😊
@crapmalls
@crapmalls 11 ай бұрын
Just chillin with a blunt and notice the battleship guns swinging in your direction 😮
@youtert
@youtert 3 жыл бұрын
"And yet it moves" -Galileo, and Ryan Symanski
@Firehawkshadow
@Firehawkshadow 3 жыл бұрын
Is there a turret lock to stop the turret from moving like in high seas I know on the tank M1A1 there is a turret lock for when it's being transported
@DepakoteMeister
@DepakoteMeister 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, it's a pin inserted from inside the turret, shown on another video, but sorry, don't know which one!
@eniszita7353
@eniszita7353 2 жыл бұрын
not sure it needs one. the driving gear is a worm gear which effectively locks the position unless the worm gear is rotating.
@nunyabusiness6746
@nunyabusiness6746 2 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy watching your videos , one of my favorite uncles’ was a plank owner serving aboard “Battleship X”. He’s been gone many years now and I regret my lack of interest when I was younger as i’m sure he had many stories to tell. I remember as a child my father telling how the 5 inch turret his brother was in took a hit during one of the battles and the shell was a dud. Incidentally, my dad also served in the US Navy aboard a Minesweeper and took part in the Normandy invasion sweeping mines for the Battleships, USS Texas, and USS Arkansas, enabling them to take up fire support positions for the landings at Omaha beach.
@SWAMPTTHING
@SWAMPTTHING 2 жыл бұрын
😵 AHH, the claustrophobia is taking over just watching this. For over 40 years I have been crawling inside of aircraft structures to inspect or repair things. Several years ago I started developing an aversion to small places to wedge and lodge my large mammal body. Watching some of the places you have visited on the ship in order to film has been impressive. At least some of the structures I have crawled into, I could cut or chew my way out LOL. Thank you for this really great collection of archival work friends.These videos really reveal a lot about the people who had to defend our way of life by operating and maintaining these ships.
@charletonzimmerman4205
@charletonzimmerman4205 3 жыл бұрын
OK, Has the "ELECTRIC MOTOR" that drives the, gearing, been disabled/"WELDED"?
@loficampingguy9664
@loficampingguy9664 3 жыл бұрын
Ryan: Today we're going to be crawling around the turret mounts. Camera person: Oh hell, not this again... Seriously whoever does the camera work props to you for also getting in whatever dark corner of the ship you have to film.
@hanktorrance6855
@hanktorrance6855 2 жыл бұрын
Always fascinating to watch videos like this which get down in the operational weeds
@wazza33racer
@wazza33racer 3 жыл бұрын
Very cool! Thanks Ryan!
@andrewdeboer7435
@andrewdeboer7435 3 жыл бұрын
Call down to Engineering and tell them we need to go to “110% Likes”.
@kamikazers3562
@kamikazers3562 3 жыл бұрын
Do you occasionally move certain parts of the ship to keep them from seizing or rusting in place, or do you generally just leave things the way they are? I love the work you do! Thank you for keeping our great history alive! -Aaron
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
We mostly leave things be. We aren't worried about keeping things operational that we can't use. Like the turrets and engines.
@crankyoldguy2
@crankyoldguy2 3 жыл бұрын
@@davowsp This question has been raised elsewhere. Practically speaking, the contract between the Navy and the museum organization severs the Navy's involvement and interest in the ship, and so they cannot be reclaimed to be put back in naval service. Ryan and his counterparts at other museum ships become the 'chief mechanics' of a boat on display. I know that some time ago (early 2000's?), the Navy worked with the Iowa and Missouri to provide surplus items from its stores, and may continue to do this. On the Iowa, the Navy was able to provide a fire control computer.
@josephstevens9888
@josephstevens9888 3 жыл бұрын
I bet no one wanted to be the guy whose job it was to grease the roller bearings... that job looks like it would really suck! Enjoyed the video Ryan.
@lyman360able
@lyman360able 3 жыл бұрын
You’re doing a great job and getting better. Thank you for making these videos.
@dake4629
@dake4629 3 жыл бұрын
In another video, you state that the Navy prohibits you from raising steam, but does the Navy prohibit you from even attempting to turn a turret?
@ScoutPL
@ScoutPL 3 жыл бұрын
just guessing that no steam means no turret rotation.
@Jrhoney
@Jrhoney 3 жыл бұрын
Takes a lot of power to shift a Second World War's worth of destroyer weight in turret form. Shore power would weep at the grid draw to shift it.
@oriontaylor
@oriontaylor 3 жыл бұрын
There’s a change I’d make on the infinitesimal chance I ever get appointed SecNav: caretakers of warship museums can do whatever they wish with them, except for scrapping and anything that harms either historical or structural integrity. If groups wanted to raise the funds to take Wisconsin under steam on paid cruises around Chesapeake Bay or something, and the work is done properly, why not?
@WALTERBROADDUS
@WALTERBROADDUS 3 жыл бұрын
You need the engines to run the generator.
@SlipFitGarage
@SlipFitGarage 3 жыл бұрын
@@Jrhoney I guarantee there is enough electricity in the power grid to turn those turrets. The question is... does the museum have enough electrical "service" connected to the ship? My guess is yes. But thats just my guess. If the ship does NOT have enough shore power, and they REALLY wanted to power the turret(s), a simple phone call to Aggreko or a CAT Power rental house and the museum can rent any size diesel generator up to a 2 megawatt (2 million watts). Yes, it would be expensive, yes its unpractical, but it COULD be done.
@Chainshot91
@Chainshot91 3 жыл бұрын
Wouldnt be worth the effort to weld them, theyd have to clear up all the grease so they didnt accidentally start a fire, and I can tell you from experience of greasing an artillery gun, that stuff doesnt come off easily.
@TheUsmc0802
@TheUsmc0802 3 жыл бұрын
This just shows you what good preventative maintenance does. That turret looks amazing, ready to rock and roll.
@rtobak
@rtobak 2 жыл бұрын
I can't wait to come and do the museum tour.
@TheHelp14
@TheHelp14 3 жыл бұрын
So technically they could work right? Also as soon as you guys open again I'm going worth the 4+hr drive
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
Maybe!
@johngraham3649
@johngraham3649 3 жыл бұрын
@battleship New Jersey Bet that would be a great fund raiser. So much money equals a video showing the turret moving . Start out small (5 inch) and work up to the big boys. Also might want to add another one to show how to elevate the barrels.
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
We do occasionally move the 5in guns for maintenance!
@SealofPerfection
@SealofPerfection 3 жыл бұрын
@@BattleshipNewJersey For "maintenance"....suuurre. We'll go with that.
@BattleshipNewJersey
@BattleshipNewJersey 3 жыл бұрын
We fire them for fun, we rotate for maintenance. Pssst if you call ahead, we let guests fire the 5im guns. Can't remember what the donation for that is, I think $500
@kylecorcoran8028
@kylecorcoran8028 3 жыл бұрын
Soo basically with enough electrical power the turrents are likely fully functional still
@iatsd
@iatsd 3 жыл бұрын
Nope. The rollers and lower ring will have deformed out of true over time just sitting there. Turrets have to be turned on a very fixed schedule if you want them to stay operational. Cf. HMS Royal Sovereign
@jth877
@jth877 3 жыл бұрын
@@iatsd Uh, no. These ships sat without any turret rotation for over 30 years in some cases. They all worked fine when reactivated.
@ghost307
@ghost307 3 жыл бұрын
Given enough time, dedication and money virtually anything is possible. The better question would be 'is it worth it?'
@envitech02
@envitech02 3 жыл бұрын
Amazing video on the mechanisms of the gun turret. Keep up the great work Mr Szimanski! Best regards from Malaysia!!
@IslandJoe45
@IslandJoe45 3 жыл бұрын
I LOVE this!! Thank you!! I visited the New Jersey back in 2007. Thanks for taking such good care of her.
@Train115
@Train115 3 жыл бұрын
Thats a lot of grease.
@austinhughes6852
@austinhughes6852 3 жыл бұрын
So they technically still do rotate.It would just take a lot of work.To get them moving.
@robertf3479
@robertf3479 3 жыл бұрын
Especially since the turret training gear would have to be manually operated, something I don't think they were designed to do, at least not easily. After Iowa suffered her explosion, at some point they had to train that turret back to a centerline position. An old shipmate who had transferred to Iowa from my ship told me that the equipment to do that is built to take incredible punishment. He explained that during their preparations to train the turret the ship's electricians and the shipyard carefully examined the training motors and drivetrain as well as the rollers that Ryan just showed us and found nothing busted or fried beyond reasonable repair. They fixed what looked like it needed TLC, installed new circuit breakers or electrical fuses and found it able to turn. They never did fully repair the turret, choosing instead to retire the ship. If she had been reactivated again, for Desert Storm for example ... she'd have come back as a six gun ship rather than as a nine gun ship.
@smoothkirito
@smoothkirito 3 жыл бұрын
As far as the other museums go, Alabama fired her rear turret during the filming of Under Siege. Iowa can not raise or lower her main guns anymore due to several components involved in the process being removed when she was placed into reserve the last time and never being replaced.
@gspiatti249
@gspiatti249 Жыл бұрын
It would still be grand to see her in action again.
@rogerdeeringer6858
@rogerdeeringer6858 Жыл бұрын
Just saw this from IOWA. What is different about the Iowa and New Jersey contracts that allow this to happen ? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z9R9faaKkqmtnYk.html Happy to see this happen and I'll have to go visit IOWA again and ask this question to that crew.
@ronaldsinclair6837
@ronaldsinclair6837 2 жыл бұрын
These are the best videos Ryan, keep em coming.
@sydneystewart6059
@sydneystewart6059 2 жыл бұрын
Ryan, you do a wonderful job presenting the videos, keep them coming.
@rickblackwell6435
@rickblackwell6435 3 жыл бұрын
The best questions are those that are only answered by serious exploration!! Thank-you Ryan.
@SgtFluffytheoriginal
@SgtFluffytheoriginal 3 жыл бұрын
That was one of my favorite maintenances to do each year
@matthewcarocci9032
@matthewcarocci9032 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video Ryan. I worked on North Carolina for a few years as the welder and I always wondered about this. Word was that they relied on the weight to keep the turret seated but I recognize some of what you pointed out on the NJ from the NC. I did have to manually rotate a few of the 5 inch gun houses when they were installing the cofferdam. Man, that was a beast.
@remington351
@remington351 3 жыл бұрын
Nice video. Small edit for our younger, non mechanical viewers, at 2:10 brass or bronze don't create sparks due to being smooth, it's because they are non-ferrous metals. I would also think the designers wanted non rusting metals due to the limited maintenance cavity.
@richardmillhousenixon
@richardmillhousenixon 2 жыл бұрын
Small edit for that. Brass/bronze don't spark because they are soft metals that don't take much energy before some material shears off. It's not just ferrous metals that spark, otherwise you wouldn't get a fireworks display every time you take a chunk of titanium to the belt grinder
@skipmountain9283
@skipmountain9283 3 жыл бұрын
There is no such thing as disliking any of your videos.....just sayin! C'mon y'all, who else clicks a new video, immediately likes it, then settles into pure battleship bliss?! 👍
@peltel2222
@peltel2222 3 жыл бұрын
This video is like crack for my brain. There is no place else on the entire World Wide Web that has in depth videos with actual real video of the subject like this. This ship is a red blooded American males wet dream. I could only imagine having run of that ship. The engineer ring that it took to make that thing is mind boggling. Even today some 80 to 90 years after it’s design and build it’s still better quality than anything today’s computer age could put out without the cost being astronomically out of sight. Ryan your videos are spot on. You hesitate a little bit during some of the narration but that is understandable. I would rather hear your explanation than anybody else’s. You’re getting better for sure. The subject matter you have to deal with definitely takes forethought to lay out the explanations in a concise yet thorough manner. Most of the time I would watch a video like this and never think about donating. After watching your videos I actually put forth quite a bit of effort trying to donate. I feel like I owe you something after watching your videos. It would be like stealing to not give you something. You definitely put forth a lot of effort like I said. You deserve all the credit in the world. I only hope that battleship gets the proper treatment and is properly preserved and hopefully one day given the opportunity to steam under her own power for demonstration/exhibition cruises much like the confederate Air Force. They have a fully functional B-29 “Fifi” and several other Aircraft it cannot be found anywhere else in the world. It’s so important these marvels of human achievement are kept in near perfect shape for future generations. People need to understand why these vessels were built and what the repercussions were if they were not built. It would be a totally different world today if the strength that the USS New Jersey and all Iowa class battleships we’re not in existence. Bad intentioned heavily motivated Countries had to contemplate the wrath of Iowa’s if they tangled with the United States Navy. Can you imagine being on the receiving side of one of those 16 inch shells! Think about that. 25 miles inland you can have a high explosive shell the size of a Prius take out near anything with near pinpoint accuracy. That’s my two cents. Thank you again Ryan. My contribution has been made. Can’t wait for more content. You’re my new favorite channel on KZfaq.
@Cobratac1963
@Cobratac1963 3 жыл бұрын
great work your crew are doing
@damndirtyrandy7721
@damndirtyrandy7721 2 жыл бұрын
I remember some of the wrecks showed capsized battleships and cruisers having the turrets fall out of the superstructure.
@StyxRiverGynoid
@StyxRiverGynoid 3 жыл бұрын
For some reason I never even thought there was a gap between the turret itself and the barbette. So, I did learn something new, thank you :)
@mushroomcloud1
@mushroomcloud1 3 жыл бұрын
That sets off my claustrophobia alarms ringing off the hook!!
@patriotic80
@patriotic80 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for saving 3 of the greatest ships of naval history. I hope one day this influences the navy to recreate a modern version of these ships . I still feel that should have been kept them in service and upgraded them years ago but I’m glad they have people like you keeping them alive and their incredible history.
@Masada1911
@Masada1911 Жыл бұрын
4 actually
@pcs9518
@pcs9518 3 жыл бұрын
The report said the training mechanism was welded. According to a 1955 navy 16” gun & turret training video MN-9321C Iowa class BBS this is located in the electric deck under the pan plate.
@crankyoldguy2
@crankyoldguy2 3 жыл бұрын
I'm betting that the people doing the work took the shortcut, and if they did weld anything, it was the pin,
@davidhempsted9081
@davidhempsted9081 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all the videos of the old Girl. You’re doing a great job showing us around. I actually got to go on the Iowa and Jersey when I was active duty. They are impressive ships.
Time to Hit the Head
11:11
Battleship New Jersey
Рет қаралды 120 М.
The Worst Mistake in Designing the Iowa Class Battleships
11:47
Battleship New Jersey
Рет қаралды 430 М.
PEDRO PEDRO INSIDEOUT
00:10
MOOMOO STUDIO [무무 스튜디오]
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
白天使选错惹黑天使生气。#天使 #小丑女
00:31
天使夫妇
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Get 10 Mega Boxes OR 60 Starr Drops!!
01:39
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
Dome, Mast, and Freeboard: Battleship NJ Maintenance Update
8:05
Battleship New Jersey
Рет қаралды 2,4 М.
Where's the Self-Destruct button on the Battleship?
9:37
Battleship New Jersey
Рет қаралды 224 М.
Turret Locking Pins: Can the Turrets Rotate? UPDATE
9:20
Battleship New Jersey
Рет қаралды 58 М.
Inside one of the LARGEST WW2 gun turrets EVER. MUST SEE !
23:42
WW2HistoryHunter
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Through the Catacombs
14:37
Battleship USS IOWA Museum
Рет қаралды 26 М.
Catacombs
16:44
Battleship New Jersey
Рет қаралды 140 М.
Battleship Armour Engineering - Why is naval armour multi-layered?
22:22
Getting Through the Canal
16:16
Battleship New Jersey
Рет қаралды 138 М.
How To Train Your Turret
6:02
Battleship USS IOWA Museum
Рет қаралды 15 М.
PEDRO PEDRO INSIDEOUT
00:10
MOOMOO STUDIO [무무 스튜디오]
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН