C’est exigeant

Svp je lis beaucoup de contradictions sur youtube, quelle est la situation actuelle du pays ? Merci

Я думала они чистят зубы палочкой

The Europeans have shared the continent of Africa between themselves in 1885 in Berlin, Germany. Burundi becomes independent in 1959 after having been ruled mainly by Belgium. 1885 it is not before Christ Jesus and the Bible didn't appear after that year. They supposed to have heard the Good News. But in the near Congo, hands and feet including those of children are chopped for rubber, palaces and other things were built in Belgium. In the near Rwanda once linked to Burundi, Tutsi and Hutu are led to be opposed against each other and in 1994 the whole world has witnessed human atrocities, we called it genocide. Burundi will know years of civil war mainly because a political leader wanted a third term and the argument was for the first term the president was designated or selected by 'MP' (indirect universal suffrage), and the constitution has stated the president is elected by the people (direct universal suffrage), therefore, the first term can't be counted, thus deadly troubles have followed. But this trouble could have been avoided, if attentiveness has surrounds things. Because if generally speaking the law isn't retroactive, the MPs can make it expressly retroactive by so doing they make it clear that this law affects the past, in this case the first term is included. They haven't done. In almost every conner of Africa you have similar journey that ends with a sort of permanent poverty and misery. Burundi has been colonized by Belgium and in the capital city of Belgium lies the European Institutions. Belgium and Europe knew the history of Burundi and the reasons why there has been civil war, mainly the issue of a third term. Now to what extent does it make sense that in a framework of a cooperation between the European Union based in Brussels and countries of Africa, Caribbean and Pacific, it is a regime that has almost 60 years of power that must be the chief negotiator for countries of Africa. What is then the message to Burundi and a sense given to the civil war in that country? If on earth, places where those who supposed to be Christians have been for centuries end in such state after a painful journey, what else should we have had instead?