Does Fluorocarbon Fishing Line Stretch LESS than Monofilament? | Mono vs Fluorocarbon vs Copolymer

  Рет қаралды 3,210

Clear Water Fishing

Clear Water Fishing

Күн бұрын

This is a Mono vs Fluorocarbon vs Copolymer test. The results are rather surprising. It doesn't matter if you use Sufix, Seaguar, P-Line, Googan Squad or Trilene, you will want to know the results of this test. This was a rather simple test. I tied one end of the fishing line to a large tube and the other to my fish scale. I measured the length before and after pulling to 8 lbs. I calculated the percentaged stretch and then share my results. Thank you for watching my video! Please SUBSCRIBE if you haven't already.
For business inquires contact: fishingfundamentals2019@gmail.com
A little about me:
I am James McBurnett. I live in the great state of Texas. Probably not where you would think, but I am located in the panhandle region. I moved here from Alabama and work as a Chemical Engineer in the area. After being here for a few years, I decided to get back to my roots as a fisherman. It is quite challenging in my area to find a body of water to fish. The closest lake to me is about 40 miles away.
After a couple more years, I realized how much I love fishing and wanted to share it with the world. Clearwater fishing was born. I wanted to teach people all about fishing. This includes rods, reels, fishing line, bait, lures, largemouth bass, crappie, walleye, catfish, bluegill, boats, boat trailers, outboards, and anything else related to fishing.
I also wanted to share my fishing experiences as well. To be entertaining, knowledgeable, comical, and FUN. This channel was created out of the love of the sport of fishing, and I plan to keep making content that represents that. Thank you for watching this video and reading a bit about me. Give me a shout out in the comments below and let me know you read this. Now get out there and go catch you some fish.
Equipment I use:
Truck 2018 Ram 2500 Laramie 6.7L Cummins
Boat 2011 Bass Tracker Pro Team 175 TXW with 60 hp Mercury 4 stroke EFI
Front Fish Finder Garmin Echomap Plus 93SV with Livescope
Trolling Motor Motorguide Xi3 70lb with Pinpoint GPS
Console Fish Finder Lowrance Elite 9ti
Camera 1 Canon EOS RP
Camera 2 GoPro Hero 8 Black
Camera 3 GoPro Hero 5 Black

Пікірлер: 29
@fantasticleese
@fantasticleese 6 ай бұрын
Appreciate your efforts in testing these lines
@jasonlopez4855
@jasonlopez4855 3 ай бұрын
I've used Zebco monofilament line for 20+ years now on most of my reels for 90% of all fishing. Is cheep enough to replace the line every fishing trip. Just me- A lot of good information thank you
@ThriftALife
@ThriftALife 3 жыл бұрын
Great video man, bravo.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 3 жыл бұрын
Much appreciated!
@kvonzwild8979
@kvonzwild8979 12 күн бұрын
Great test. Surprised me some. I feel I have the best of all with th copolymer in terms of stretch, strength, and visibility. I also find flouro easier to break with a quick jerk than either.
@sungkang8444
@sungkang8444 9 ай бұрын
I used to use the improved clinch all the time but I was losing fish. So I switched to the uni knot and it stopped happening. Now I only use that knot for everything.
@matthewotis3594
@matthewotis3594 3 ай бұрын
Me too. Lost too many lures and fish trying to flip them onto the bank. No problems with the uni or trilene.
@zachweber5623
@zachweber5623 2 жыл бұрын
Confirming what I’ve been thinking.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 2 жыл бұрын
It makes sense when you think about it. It got me at first.
@texasfishingguy4076
@texasfishingguy4076 3 жыл бұрын
These are surprising results.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 3 жыл бұрын
They surprised me too!
@azurf843
@azurf843 3 жыл бұрын
It would be good if you recorded the stretch at every pound of pressure. This would show you which line has a higher resistance to stretching through a range of pressure instead of a total stretch at a single poundage. Those could be plotted and more than likely, they would be quadratic curves. Also have heard people say flouro resists stretching when fast pressure is applied (like a hookset) instead of a slow pull done in your test. I have an idea for how that could be tested but it would take a long time to explain
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 3 жыл бұрын
That is an interesting thought. It probably isn't a linear relationship. If it is, it is because it is over a short distance. The hookset idea is also a good one. I would need some peak weight recording device to make it work.
@azurf843
@azurf843 3 жыл бұрын
My thought was a weight to both ends. One pound each for an example but that can be optimized. Have one weight on a table at a 0 inch mark. Drop the other weight from a designated height on slack line to replicate a slack like hookset. By dropping from a specific height will yield the same potential and kinetic energy for each drop. Less energy lost to stretch equals more energy transfered to the other weight and more linear movement of the second weight. I would include braid in the test as well to see the difference with a true zero stretch line. It isn't perfect but it is a starting point for a test method.
@caniaccharlie
@caniaccharlie Жыл бұрын
I wonder how a different knot would do on the breaking strength? I've always used the IC know. It's outside the scope of this test, I know lol.
@bxcloud104
@bxcloud104 3 жыл бұрын
Fluorocarbon is more dense, hence it sinks faster. I'm not sure if that makes it a bit more sensitive. For myself no, sensitivity is subjective anyways. But when I feel need more depth, that's the only time I'll use it. For the other check boxes like stretch, visibility, abrasion resistance it's either won by mono or a tied per tests other videos and forum post testing that I've seen. Of course maybe wet tests can different? But mono has been my main clear line, since my real world experience found fluorocarbon to be highly overated.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 3 жыл бұрын
After doing this test myself, I am defineitly on your side with this one. The only question I really have remaining, is fluorocarbon less visible in the water?
@Jon-nz3dm
@Jon-nz3dm Жыл бұрын
Fluorocarbon has some of the biggest lies around it in the industry. The amount of stretch isn't _technically_ untrue, simply due to the fact that mono/copolymer(most mono lines are actually copolymers) stretch significantly more after they are soaked while fluoro only stretches a very small amount more. This has been tested a bunch on various forums and mono ends up stretching quite a bit more. The worst lies in my opinion are big companies trying to say fluoro has more abrasion resistance and invisibility in water. Ironically AbrazX has been tested to be one of the worst when it comes to abrasion resistance.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing Жыл бұрын
I think what happens is there isn't a much of a standard (that I know of) to measure and compare lines in aspects other than strength.
@aldeureaux5184
@aldeureaux5184 3 жыл бұрын
The stretch difference appears to be negligible. I would be interested to see how less visible fluorocarbon is compared to mono in clear water.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 3 жыл бұрын
Me too. Kinda hard to measure that though.
@fishingwithaaron314
@fishingwithaaron314 Жыл бұрын
Do you think P line CXX Crystal Clear is a good line? Super low price. What do you think about it?
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing Жыл бұрын
It is mono line. I don't find much difference in name brand mono lines. Just stay away from the off brand stuff.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 3 жыл бұрын
Did these results surprise you?
@eFishin
@eFishin 3 жыл бұрын
Nope. This is the second video that I have seen on this. The first one was several years ago and had similar results. They also did an abrasion test and fluorocarbon came out near the bottom on that one as well. I've also had too many negative experiences with fluorocarbon to not use it. Mainly broken line on hooksets and if it gets a kink in it, it breaks way too easily. I do like copolymer line.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 3 жыл бұрын
@@eFishin That's pretty interesting. Didn't know that it also had poor abrasion resistance. I will probably be sticking to my copolymer for now.
@eFishin
@eFishin 3 жыл бұрын
@@clearwaterfishing that's my experience with it. Everyone's mileage might vary. I don't know if there is a best anything (line, rod, reel, etc.). What works for you might not work for me. Everyone has to figure out what works for themselves. But KZfaq channels certainly help folks figure that out. Nice video.
@clearwaterfishing
@clearwaterfishing 3 жыл бұрын
@@eFishin Thank you!
How Can You Tie the Strongest Knot? | A new CHAMPION?
2:39
Clear Water Fishing
Рет қаралды 417
He sees meat everywhere 😄🥩
00:11
AngLova
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Пробую самое сладкое вещество во Вселенной
00:41
Tom & Jerry !! 😂😂
00:59
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 61 МЛН
Fluorocarbon vs. Monofilament Line Stress Test Experiment Results!
16:09
The Truth About Monofilament and Fluorocarbon Line Stretch
3:45
The Great Lakes Fisherman
Рет қаралды 424
This CHANGED The Way I Choose FISHING LINE!
12:34
Nathan Quince Fishing
Рет қаралды 63 М.
Which Fishing Line Is BEST?? (Monofilament vs. Fluorocarbon vs. Braid)
17:13
Pool Test: Is fluorocarbon really less visible?
8:44
Marsh Man Masson
Рет қаралды 41 М.
4 Best Knots for Mono
14:42
Roland Martin Outdoors
Рет қаралды 23 М.
I believed this LIE about FLUOROCARBON For Years
9:01
Tyler Berger
Рет қаралды 106 М.
Уделала дерзкую чемпионку!
0:59
БЕЗУМНЫЙ СПОРТ
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
100% НЕЗАБЫВАЕМЫЕ МОМЕНТЫ В ФУТБОЛЕ
21:25
ЖИЗНЬ ФУТБОЛ
Рет қаралды 400 М.
Довёл до срыва западную звезду!
1:00
МИНУС БАЛЛ
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН