@rodneyjackson6181 Ай бұрын
I would also note that further you go back to the time of Christ the less manuscripts you will have because of age. The later in time you get, the more manuscripts you will have.
@hayfieldhermit9657 Ай бұрын
Dwayne, would you be in favor of an ESV or maybe CSB edition that has a Byzantine priority text for the N.T.? The CSB already had the Byzantine readings in the notes. All they would have to do is swap the notes and Critical readings.
@Dwayne_Green Ай бұрын
That would be good, sort of. lol... I think having a Critical text version and than a Byzantine version might be a bit confusing for those not up on the Text Critical discussion, so. I think IF a Byzantine text new testament were to be done, it should at the very least have it's own name. I do debate back and forth if it's worth having yet ANOTHER english New Testament on the market.
@rodneyjackson6181 Ай бұрын
All I am seeing in your videos no matter which side you come down on is speculation. Still the oldest manuscripts do not contain this verse. Even if you have witnesses within 100 years after Sinaiticus or Vaticanus that is still multiple years of copying. If manuscripts were found within 10 years of the time they were originally written, would we believe what they said or continue our tradition or biased to a certain text type? For me, I would go with the manuscript closest to the original. That makes more sense to me.
@Dwayne_Green Ай бұрын
But the ancient Versions are older then Aleph and B, by a century I should add!
@rodneyjackson6181 Ай бұрын
@@Dwayne_Greenwhat ancient versions? I have seen and read that Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are the oldest Greek manuscripts we have from the second and fourth centuries.
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 21 МЛН